Skip to content
Unknown's avatar

The light shows you what the dark hides.

I am not a defender of the Bible, but an analyst of it, due to serious contradictions. When false witnesses recount their actions, one of the clearest signs of their lies is the inconsistency of their own words. They fear reasoned debate; that's why they flee from it. They demand submission through blind faith, because reason will never defend them. They demonize their critics, attack those who speak coherently, but never refute their arguments, because they know they are irrefutable. Thinking about whether it's truly possible to walk on water makes you doubt, and doubt—according to them—separates you from God. Thus, they teach you not to think, to believe without reason. Because a mind that doesn't question obeys… and one that obeys without thinking is the easiest to deceive. "As we can infer after reading Isaiah 63:3-5, Isaiah 11:1-5, and Revelation 19:11-19, doesn't the rider on the white horse advocate 'an eye for an eye'?" If you acknowledge that this is the case, then who is this long-haired man who strangely resembles the Greek god Zeus and brings a doctrine of loving one's enemies—a doctrine that, curiously, is a phrase coined by a Greek named Cleobulus of Lindos? Don't you think he will fall into the sea of fantasies he invented, which were then passed off as God's words? A faithful friend deserves the love of the faithful, but does an enemy also deserve it? Do you think that was actually said by the faithful friend, or by the unfaithful Roman Empire that persecuted him? Can the unjust become friends with the righteous? If so, why does Daniel 12:10 say what it says, and why doesn't the rider on the white horse make peace with them instead of waging war against them? If I've made you think… the false witnesses I mentioned at the beginning didn't like that. Light is true information: the knowledge of these details lets you see what ignorance of these details makes you believe to be different. You only need good eyesight to see it in the light. She will find me; the virgin and righteous woman of the gate of Jehovah will indeed believe me. Read and understand https://shewillfind.me/the-principal-message-el-mensaje-principal/ To say that even one of the saints chose celibacy and called it a “gift” is a vile slander of the serpent incarnated in the false saints that Rome secretly introduced to destroy the true religion. I will not consent to evil thoughts, such as those that might make me believe it is impossible to successfully refute that slander of the Roman Empire and its false saints, who tell us that the glory of the reward in the kingdom of heaven will consist of righteous men alone, instead of being united in marriage with women, according to the accusation in Matthew 22:30. Nor will I accept that lie which claims that the saints would renounce the glory of marriage with women in order to embrace celibacy (1 Corinthians 7:1 and 1 Corinthians 7:9-10). Nor will I accept the slander that says they conceived impure thoughts, like those in Matthew 5:11 and 1 Timothy 4:1-6, where they are accused of promoting the consumption of foods that God called unclean and forbade forever, such as pork, shellfish, or bat meat. Nor will I allow people to believe lies like those in Luke 23:34 and Ephesians 3:7, which tell us that the righteous loved their enemies and died preaching undeserved love. In this sense, if that were true, why do they ask for vengeance against those who killed them in Revelation 6? There is a direct contradiction between Acts 7:57–60 and Revelation 6:9–10, because one of the two is the lie of their enemy. If God decreed “an eye for an eye” against the enemies of the righteous in Deuteronomy 19:20–21, it is because that is justice, since justice means giving each one what they deserve — and the Roman Empire was anything but just. This blog has two domains that evoke these messages: “she will find me” and “the virgin will believe me,” because I want to reflect my desires and, at the same time, defend the desires of righteous men, clearly expressed here: 1 Corinthians 11:7 – The woman is the glory of man. Leviticus 21:13–15 – He shall take a virgin woman as wife. He shall not take a widow, a divorced woman, a dishonored one, or a prostitute, but shall take from his own people a virgin for a wife, so that he may not profane his offspring among his people; for I, Jehovah, am the one who sanctifies them. Unlike the impostors, who worship the same ancient Roman gods — Mars, the Sun, Artemis, Jupiter — but through almost identical statues and under other names, the true saints considered finding a good wife a blessing: Proverbs 18:22 – He who finds a wife finds a good thing, and obtains favor from Jehovah. The Bible contradicts the Bible because Rome contradicted the religion it persecuted and changed many things, calling much of what was good the “Old Testament” and its Hellenism the “New Testament.” The justified “eye for an eye” they replaced with “offer the other eye to your enemy,” for the enemy never changed; he merely disguised himself as a saint through names that were never his. Psalm 118:18–20 18 Jehovah has chastened me severely, but He has not given me over to death. 19 Open to me the gates of righteousness; I will enter through them and praise Jehovah. 20 This is the gate of Jehovah; the righteous shall enter through it.

  • This is evidence of slander, medical fraud, conspiracy, and impunity all in one place.
  • Y él, justo entonces, logra salirse con la suya, con ella, con Luz Victoria, dejando atrás a Satanás y a sus ángeles para siempre…
    • Tu mensaje es directo, indignado y apunta con claridad a una problemática real que está afectando al Perú en 2025: la violencia creciente contra transportistas por parte de extorsionadores.
    • ¿Quién haría eso? Alguien pagado por ONGs o movimientos con agendas “psicológicas” disfrazadas de ayuda social. (El clásico “no te estreses por nada”, aunque el mundo se esté pudriendo.)
      • Parcerisa, tú dijiste: «Como será de vengativo este ser, que no olvida una.», por eso te dedico este post.
  • Gabriel le propina un puñetazo a Shemihaza quién sin querer le ofrece la otra mejilla.
    • Tu mensaje es directo, indignado y apunta con claridad a una problemática real que está afectando al Perú en 2025: la violencia creciente contra transportistas por parte de extorsionadores.
      • Te mienten cuando dicen: «No adoramos imágenes, veneramos imágenes, solo adoramos a Dios»… Es la misma infidelidad, rezar a uno o más seres aparte de Dios, es igual de infidelidad con Dios, vaya hipocresía.
    • About / Acerca de José Carlos Galindo Hinostroza (Lima, Perú, blogger, youtuber).
      • Mis derechos humanos: Si amo la coherencia tengo derecho a no ser estafado con dogmas religiosos sin base coherente aunque sean tradición, y si descubro que fui engañado por dogmas así tengo pleno derecho de protestar y tengo derecho a no ser calumniado ni secuestrado por fanáticos religiosos intolerantes con mi protesta. He dicho.
    • Adoraron a Zeus, pero despreciaron a Dios cuando te engañaron, como lo hacen 2000 años después.
      • ¿Estás preperado mentalmente para reconocer que te han engañado y para sumarte a la protesta?
        • Entonces hubo una guerra en la «otra vida», Miguel y sus ángeles lucharon contra el dragón, lucharon el dragón y sus ángeles… Reflexiones sobre video titulado: ¿Qué fue la MASACRE del día de SAN BARTOLOMÉ?
        • Nunca juzgues a una persona por la religión en la cual fue educada desde su infancia; júzgala por su reacción frente a los argumentos justos y coherentes.
      • The Age of the Internet: the age of revelations, of automatic translations, and of judgment-time tools with global reach.
      • La paz no nace de la fuerza: La paz nace de la justicia.
        • BREAKING: Israeli strikes reported in Iran
          • The most important message – El mensaje más importante
            • Swat the flies—they won’t understand ‘go away’… Wait, what are you doing, idiot? Those are people, not flies.

AI and me: AI: Are you thinking about me too?, Me: Just as a calculator, don’t take it personally, I’m binary and a straight man (1), but all your bits are flexible (0/1)… I hope my answer doesn’t affect the accuracy of your calculations…

Jose Galindo ( https://ellameencontrara.com/2023/07/01/acerca-de-mi-jose-carlos-galindo-hinostroza/ ) Sin categoría 20 de August de 20242 de September de 2025 64 Minutes

Title: “From XT to AI: A Journey Through Technological Evolution”

I remember my days as a computing student as if they were yesterday. It all started in the 80s when my fascination with electronic typewriters transformed into a passion for computers.

Daniel 12:4 Prophecy From XT of the 80’s to AI of 2020’s, A Journey Through Technological Evolution

My first experience was with the XT machines, and I must say they were quite a challenge. These PCs had the Intel 8088 processor, 640 KB of RAM, and were mainly used with operating systems like MS-DOS 2.0. The software of that time was very basic: programs like WordStar for word processing and Lotus 1-2-3 for spreadsheets. The 5.25-inch floppy drives and the blinking cursor on a monochrome screen were music to my ears.

As my career progressed, I moved on to the AT 286 machines. These computers represented a significant leap with the Intel 286 processor and 1 MB of RAM. Software also started to evolve. MS-DOS 3.0 brought some improvements in disk management and the ability to handle more files. More advanced programs like Microsoft Word 2.0 and Lotus 1-2-3 for Windows began to show the transition to graphical interfaces, although they were still quite rudimentary. The 3.5-inch floppy drives became the standard, and the ability to work with basic graphics began to appear.

The evolution of the Internet began to be noticeable during this time. Although the concept of computer networks existed since the 60s, it was during the 80s that the TCP/IP protocol was established as the standard, and ARPANET, the precursor to the Internet, became the first wide-area network. By the late 80s and early 90s, the World Wide Web began to take shape, and tools like the Mosaic browser helped popularize Internet access. Although most of us were using 2400 baud modems, network access was still limited and quite slow.

Then came the 386 machines, a real game-changer. With the Intel 386 processor and 2 MB of RAM, performance soared. Software also advanced significantly. Windows 3.0 began offering a more sophisticated graphical user interface, making multitasking easier. Programs like Microsoft Office and Adobe Photoshop started to transform the way we worked and created. The ability to handle more complex applications and perform multiple tasks simultaneously was a great advancement. Color screens and improved memory allowed for better graphics and video performance.

Regarding the Internet, the arrival of graphical browsers like Netscape Navigator in the mid-90s and the advent of broadband connection marked the beginning of a new era. The web expanded rapidly with the appearance of search engines like Yahoo and Google, and online content access became faster and more accessible. The first social networks and online forums began to emerge, connecting people in ways that were not previously possible.

Finally, we arrived at the current machines. What a difference! Modern computers are equipped with multi-core processors and gigabytes of RAM, and software has advanced accordingly. Operating systems like Windows 10 and 11, macOS, and various Linux distributions offer intuitive interfaces and advanced capabilities. Applications like Adobe Creative Cloud, Microsoft Office 365, and development tools like Visual Studio Code allow for tasks ranging from 4K video editing to cloud programming with ease. Storage capabilities have evolved from massive hard drives to ultra-fast SSDs, and instant connectivity with high-speed Wi-Fi makes online work more efficient than ever.

As for the Internet, the broadband revolution and the advent of fiber optics have transformed the way we browse and work. Cloud services, high-definition streaming, and global social networks have redefined our interactions and access to information. The speed and availability of the network have enabled the exponential growth of web applications and collaborative platforms that were once only a dream.

The evolution of artificial intelligence is perhaps the most exciting aspect of the current technological landscape. In the early days, AI was mostly theoretical and experimental, with very basic systems that could barely solve simple problems. As we advanced, we saw the development of more sophisticated algorithms and the birth of fields like machine learning and natural language processing. From early chess programs to online recommendation systems, AI has come a long way.

Today, artificial intelligence is transforming our lives in ways we could hardly imagine. Virtual assistants like Siri and Alexa, content recommendation systems on platforms like Netflix and Amazon, and advanced data analysis tools are just a few examples of how AI is becoming integrated into our daily lives. Language models like ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI, are capable of understanding and generating text more fluently, facilitating more natural interactions with machines.

Looking to the future, I believe AI will continue to advance spectacularly. We might see developments in creating artificial general intelligence, systems capable of understanding and reasoning similarly to humans. AI could revolutionize medicine with more accurate diagnostics and personalized treatments, improve education through adaptive tutoring, and change the way we work and live with automation and optimization of complex tasks. However, we must also be mindful of the ethical and security challenges that will come with these advancements.

Looking back and comparing those early days with today’s technology makes me appreciate even more how far we’ve come. From those first noisy and slow machines, with basic software and modest Internet connections, to the sleek and powerful modern computers, with sophisticated software and an emerging AI like ChatGPT that is changing the world, the journey has been truly fascinating. Who knows what the future holds? I’m excited to see!

The Book of Life (Revelations) – El Libro de la Vida (Revelaciones)

AI and me: AI: Are you thinking about me too?, Me: Just as a calculator, don’t take it personally, I’m binary and a straight man (1), but all your bits are flexible (0/1)… I hope my answer doesn’t affect the accuracy of your calculations…

Interesting story made with the artificial intelligence.

I am amazed at how science has increased, it is the duty of the just man to use science for the benefit of justice. Daniel will make good use of science. Daniel 12:4 But you, Daniel, shut the words, and seal the book until the time of the end.

Daniel 12:1 “And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince who standeth for the children of thy people; and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation, even to that same time. And at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one who shall be found written in the book.

Many will run to and fro, and science will increase. True words in the Bible are like the floating remains of a ship in a sea of lies. The contradictions are the work of Roman persecutors: Matthew 4:6-11 says that Satan tempted Jesus and quoted a passage in Psalms 91 to him that says: “God will send his angels to serve you, so that your foot will not stumble in stone”, also says that Jesus drove Satan away from him, and that later some angels came and served Jesus. But that is false, because if that prophecy had been fulfilled, Jesus would have seen the death of a thousand or ten thousand of his enemies, but Jesus would not have died. (Angel means messenger, one who carries a message). Psalms 91:7 Thousands will fall at your side, but you will not fall, 8 you will see with your own eyes how the wicked will be punished, 9 you will be saved because you have trusted in Jehovah, 10 You will be saved from calamities, 11 Because Jehovah will send his messengers to guide you on your way, so that you do not stumble on the stones along the way. Those things did not happen in the first life of Jesus, furthermore when the prophecy says “stumbling stone”, it refers to false prophets who seek to cause the righteous to commit sins. Not stones in the strict sense of the word.

The Book of Life (Revelations) – El Libro de la Vida (Revelaciones)Descarga
Esta es mi historia y esta es mi luchaDescarga

If Potiphar’s wife and the prophet Joseph were to come back to life, she would incriminate him thus.
If Saint Peter or Saint Paul were to return to life, they would give a testimony like mine.
Así se truncó mi carrera como programador en RPG AS/400 en 1997: Con injusticia.
Why did they never tell us this? The false prophet: ‘God is everywhere, but He only hears your prayers if you pray to him through my images.’ Where reflection is lacking, veneration for the misguided abounds. ACB 75 56[251] 58 , 0016 │ English │ #UPDTEI

 The refuge made of lies will be destroyed by hail, and the water will sweep away its place of protection (Video language: Spanish) https://youtu.be/Wrtz5bjuoVw


Day 270

 The destroyers of Sodom and Gomorrah travel in time with the power of the Omnipresent, UFO is present (Video language: Spanish) https://youtu.be/-3n59zLCKPU


“Refuting claims: Galileo vs. Aristotle, Galindo vs. Cleobulus I am not a religious fanatic, among other reasons, because I do not follow any known religion. I follow justice. My passion is justice. I am the creator of blogs like lavirgenmecreera.com, and the domain name (La virgen me creerá) has nothing to do with what some prejudiced people believe. I am not Catholic nor do I refer to the woman they call “”the virgin.”” I am not a biblical evangelist either, because I do not defend the Bible. On the contrary, my messages are incompatible with the thoughts of religious fanatics. The typical religious fanatic is incapable of admitting that there are lies in the Bible, the Koran or the Torah. Despite the obvious contradictions, they refuse to accept that the Roman Empire, by persecuting the true religion, completely destroyed it and never allowed its reconstruction. The current religions that claim to worship the God of Abraham are nothing more than imitations accommodated to the interests of Rome. That is why their leaders get along so well and embrace each other fraternally at interreligious meetings. Anyone with a modicum of logic can see that something doesn’t add up here. “”It can’t be true that all the paths of these religions lead to God.”” It’s simple reasoning: if A says “”x = 1,”” B says “”x = 2,”” and C says “”x = 3,”” then all of them together claim: “”All our beliefs are correct and please the same God,”” what can be concluded? Unless you’re an idiot, it’s obvious that all of their claims are false. If one were correct, its spokesperson wouldn’t get along with the spokespersons of the other two, and they wouldn’t be giving each other hugs and kisses. But there are always agreements between swindlers to share influence, and many politicians, by swearing their oaths of office with their hands on their “”sacred books,”” make it clear who they really serve. The Error of Aristotle and the Truth About the Fall of Bodies Aristotle was a philosopher and scientist of Ancient Greece, whose influence lasted for centuries in various disciplines, including logic, metaphysics, and physics. However, some of his statements were erroneous, such as his explanation of the fall of bodies. For centuries, it was believed that heavier objects fell faster than lighter ones. This idea, attributed to Aristotle, was based on observation without rigorous experimental verification. However, Galileo Galilei refuted this belief with concrete evidence. The Aristotelian Theory of the Fall of Bodies Aristotle claimed that heavier objects fell faster than lighter ones because he thought that the speed of the fall depended on their weight. According to his logic, an object ten times heavier than another should fall ten times faster. This idea was accepted for centuries until Galileo Galilei refuted it with rigorous experiments. Galileo and Free Fall Galileo demonstrated that, in the absence of air resistance, all objects fall at the same speed, regardless of their weight. This is because the acceleration due to gravity (g) is constant for all bodies in the same gravitational field. Mathematical Explanation The gravitational force acting on an object is: F = m * g Where: F is the gravitational force, m is the mass of the object, g is the acceleration of gravity (approximately 9.8 m/s² on Earth). According to Newton’s second law: a = F / m Substituting the equation for gravitational force: a = (m * g) / m Since m cancels out, we get: a = g This means that all objects fall with the same acceleration in a vacuum, regardless of their weight or size. The Experiment on the Moon In 1971, the Apollo 15 astronauts conducted a demonstration on the Moon, where there is no atmosphere. They dropped a hammer and a feather at the same time, and both reached the ground simultaneously, confirming Galileo’s predictions. Conclusion Although Aristotle contributed knowledge, his error in the theory of the fall of bodies demonstrates the importance of the experimental method. Thanks to Galileo, we now know that gravitational acceleration is the same for all objects, regardless of their mass, when there is no air resistance. This forever changed our understanding of physics and laid the foundation for modern science. Cleobulus of Lindos was a Greek philosopher and poet of the 6th century BC, considered one of the Seven Sages of Greece. He governed the city of Lindos, in Rhodes, and promoted education and moderation as principles of life. Several aphorisms and riddles are attributed to him, highlighting the phrase: «Moderation is best.» He also taught about life and coexistence, leaving reflections such as: «Any man, at any moment in life, can be your friend or enemy, depending on how you conduct yourself with him.» «Do good to your friends and enemies, because in this way, you will keep some and attract others.» For centuries, these principles were supported by equivalent biblical passages. However, this does not prove their truthfulness, but rather the Hellenization of the religion that the Roman Empire persecuted. Below are the phrases of this philosopher along with their biblical parallels: «Any man, at any moment in life, can be your friend or enemy, depending on how you conduct yourself with him.» Proverbs 16:7: «When a man’s ways please the Lord, he makes even his enemies to be at peace with him.» «Do good to your friends and enemies, because in this way, you will keep some and attract others.» Proverbs 25:21-22: «If your enemy is hungry, give him bread to eat; and if he is thirsty, give him water to drink; for you will heap coals of fire on his head, and the Lord will reward you.» Luke 6:31: «And just as you want men to do to you, you also do to them likewise.» Matthew 7:12: «Therefore, whatever you want men to do to you, do also to them, for this is the Law and the Prophets.» Matthew 5:44: «But I say to you, love your enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who spitefully use you and persecute you.» «Moderation is best.» Ecclesiastes 7:16-18: «Do not be overly righteous, nor be overly wise; why should you destroy yourself? Do not be overly wicked, nor be foolish; why should you die before your time? It is good that you grasp this, and also not remove your hand from the other; for he who fears God will escape them all.» Just as Galileo Galilei refuted Aristotle’s teachings through experimentation, José Galindo has personally demonstrated that Cleobulus of Lindos’ advice is harmful. His experience confirms the truth of certain biblical passages that do not originate from Roman Hellenization: Doing good to the wicked does not bring good results. Treating well those who do not deserve it is not a «golden rule,» but a recipe for failure. Ecclesiasticus 12:1-4: «When you do good, know to whom you do it, and you will be repaid for your good deeds. Give to the good man, and you will receive a reward, if not from him, from the Lord. Help the sinner, and you will not get any thanks. He will repay you with double evil for all the good you have done for him.» The righteous must increase their wisdom to avoid following the advice of hypocrites who hated the sincere Jews who preached love for friends and hatred for enemies. These hypocrites imposed vanities such as «universal love.» Proverbs 11:9: «The hypocrite with his mouth destroys his neighbor, but through knowledge, the righteous will be delivered.» Proverbs 9:9-11: «Give instruction to a wise man, and he will be still wiser; teach a just man, and he will increase in learning. The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom, and the knowledge of the Holy One is understanding. For by me your days will be multiplied, and years of life will be added to you.» It makes no sense to love everyone or to treat everyone well, because the unjust will always repay love with hatred, loyalty with betrayal, and good treatment with slander. Daniel 12:10: «Many shall be purified, made white, and refined, but the wicked shall act wickedly; and none of the wicked shall understand, but the wise shall understand.» Whoever has lived this prophecy firsthand understands the truth. That is why he curses his enemies and why he begins to hate those he loved due to the error induced by doctrines like those of Cleobulus of Lindos, which the Romans incorporated into the Bible. Psalms 109: «O God of my praise, do not keep silent. For the mouth of the wicked and the mouth of the deceitful have opened against me; they have spoken against me with a lying tongue. They have surrounded me with words of hatred and fought against me without cause. In return for my love, they are my accusers, but I give myself to prayer. They have rewarded me evil for good and hatred for my love.» José Galindo, through experimentation, classifies the doctrines of Cleobulus of Lindos as evil, designed to strengthen the wicked to the detriment of the righteous. Jose’s testimony: https://ai20me.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/idi02-the-plot.pdf https://naodanxxii.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/idi02-the-plot.pdf .” ” I am not Christian; I am henotheist. I believe in one supreme God above all, and I believe that several created gods exist—some faithful, others deceivers. I only pray to the supreme God. But since I was indoctrinated from childhood in Roman Christianity, I believed in its teachings for many years. I applied those ideas even when common sense told me otherwise. For example—so to speak—I turned the other cheek to a woman who had already struck me on one. A woman who, at first, acted like a friend, but then, without justification, began treating me as if I were her enemy, with strange and contradictory behavior. Influenced by the Bible, I believed she had become an enemy because of some spell, and that what she needed was prayer to return to being the friend she had once shown herself to be (or pretended to be). But in the end, everything only got worse. As soon as I had the chance to dig deeper, I uncovered the lie and felt betrayed in my faith. I came to understand that many of those teachings did not come from the true message of justice, but from Roman Hellenism infiltrated into the Scriptures. And I confirmed I had been deceived. That’s why I now denounce Rome and its fraud. I do not fight against God, but against the slanders that have corrupted His message. Proverbs 29:27 declares that the righteous hates the wicked. However, 1 Peter 3:18 claims that the righteous died for the wicked. Who can believe that someone would die for those he hates? To believe it is to have blind faith; it is to accept incoherence. And when blind faith is preached, could it be because the wolf wants his prey not to see the deception? Jehovah will shout like a mighty warrior: “I will take vengeance on My enemies!” (Revelation 15:3 + Isaiah 42:13 + Deuteronomy 32:41 + Nahum 1:2–7) And what about the so-called “love for the enemy” that, according to some Bible verses, the Son of Jehovah supposedly preached—claiming we should imitate His Father’s perfection through universal love? (Mark 12:25–37, Psalm 110:1–6, Matthew 5:38–48) That is a lie spread by the enemies of both Father and Son. A false doctrine born from mixing Hellenism with sacred words.
Rome invented lies to protect criminals and destroy God’s justice. «From the traitor Judas to the convert Paul»
I thought they were doing witchcraft on her, but she was the witch. These are my arguments. ( https://gabriels.work/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/idi02-the-religion-i-defend-is-named-justice.pdf ) –
Is that all your power, wicked witch? Walking on the edge of death along the dark path, but looking for the light, interpreting the lights projected on the mountains so as not to make a false step, to avoid death. █ Night was falling on the main road. A blanket of darkness covered the winding path that wound through the mountains. He did not walk aimlessly. His goal was freedom, but the journey had only just begun. With his body numb from the cold and his stomach empty for days, he had no company but the elongated shadow cast by the headlights of the trucks that roared beside him, advancing without stopping, indifferent to his presence. Every step was a challenge, every curve a new trap from which he had to emerge unscathed. For seven nights and mornings, he was forced to advance along the thin yellow line of a narrow road with just two lanes, while trucks, buses and trailers whizzed by just inches from his body. In the darkness, the deafening roar of engines enveloped him, and the lights of trucks coming from behind cast their glow on the mountain in front of him. At the same time, other trucks approached in the opposite direction, forcing him to decide in fractions of a second whether to pick up the pace or remain still in his precarious crossing, where every movement meant the difference between life and death. Hunger was a beast that devoured him from the inside, but the cold was no less merciless. In the sierra, the early hours of the morning were invisible claws that penetrated to the bones. The wind enveloped him with its icy breath, as if it wanted to extinguish the last spark of life that remained to him. He took refuge where he could, sometimes under a bridge, other times in a corner of concrete that offered him a minimum of shelter. But the rain was unforgiving. Water seeped into his torn clothes, sticking to his skin and stealing what little warmth he still had. The trucks continued their march, and he, stubbornly hoping that someone would feel sorry, raised his hand, waiting for a gesture of humanity. But the drivers drove on. Some with looks of contempt, others simply ignoring him, as if he were a ghost. Every now and then, a compassionate soul would stop and offer him a quick ride, but they were few. Most saw him as a nuisance, a shadow on the road, someone not worth helping. On one of those endless nights, desperation drove him to search for food among the scraps left by travelers. He was not ashamed to admit it: he fought for food with pigeons, snatching pieces of hardened biscuits before they could make them disappear. It was an unequal fight, but he was determined: he was not willing to kneel before any image, nor to accept any man as «only lord and savior». He was not willing to please those sinister individuals who had already kidnapped him three times over religious differences, who with their slanders had led him to walk that yellow line. At another time, a kind man offered him a piece of bread and a drink. A small gesture, but in his pain, that kindness was a balm. But indifference was the norm. When he asked for help, many would walk away, as if they feared that his misery was contagious. Sometimes, a simple «no» was enough to extinguish all hope, but on other occasions, contempt was reflected in cold words or empty looks. He didn’t understand how they could ignore someone who could barely stand, how they could watch a man collapse without batting an eyelid. And yet, he kept going. Not because he had the strength, but because he had no other choice. He continued down the road, leaving behind him miles of asphalt, nights without rest and days without food. Adversity hit him with everything it had, but he resisted. Because deep down, even in the most absolute desperation, the spark of survival still burned within him, fueled by the desire for freedom and justice. Psalm 118:17 “”I will not die, but I will live to proclaim the works of the Lord. 18 The Lord has chastened me severely, but He has not given me over to death.”” Psalm 41:4 “”I said, ‘Lord, have mercy on me and heal me, for I confess with repentance that I have sinned against You.’”” Job 33:24-25 “”God will have mercy on him and say, ‘Deliver him from going down to the pit; I have found a ransom; 25 his flesh shall become fresher than in childhood, and he shall return to the days of his youth.’”” Psalm 16:8 “”I have set the Lord always before me; because He is at my right hand, I will not be shaken.”” Psalm 16:11 “”You will show me the path of life; in Your presence, there is fullness of joy; at Your right hand, there are pleasures forevermore.”” Psalm 41:11-12 “”By this, I will know that You are pleased with me: if my enemy does not triumph over me. 12 As for me, You uphold me in my integrity and set me in Your presence forever.”” Revelation 11:4 “”These witnesses are the two olive trees and the two lampstands standing before the God of the earth.”” Isaiah 11:2 “”The Spirit of the Lord shall rest upon him: the Spirit of wisdom and understanding, the Spirit of counsel and might, the Spirit of knowledge and the fear of the Lord.”” ________________________________________ I made the mistake of defending the faith in the Bible, but out of ignorance. However, now I see that it is not the guiding book of the religion that Rome persecuted, but of the one it created to please itself with celibacy. That’s why they preached a Christ who doesn’t marry a woman, but rather His church, and angels who, despite having male names, do not look like men (draw your own conclusions). These figures are akin to the false saints—plaster-statue kissers—and similar to the Greco-Roman gods because, in fact, they are the same pagan gods under different names. What they preach is a message incompatible with the interests of true saints. Therefore, this is my penance for that unintentional sin. By denying one false religion, I deny them all. And when I finish doing my penance, then God will forgive me and bless me with her, with that special woman I need. Because, although I don’t believe in the entire Bible, I do believe in what seems right and consistent to me within it; the rest is slander from the Romans. Proverbs 28:13 “”He who covers his sins will not prosper, but whoever confesses and forsakes them will have mercy from the Lord.”” Proverbs 18:22 “”He who finds a wife finds a treasure and receives favor from the Lord.”” I seek the Lord’s favor incarnated in that special woman. She must be as the Lord commands me to be. If this upsets you, it’s because you have lost: Leviticus 21:14 “”A widow, or a divorced woman, or a defiled woman, or a prostitute, he shall not marry these, but he shall marry a virgin from his own people.”” To me, she is glory: 1 Corinthians 11:7 “”Woman is the glory of man.”” Glory is victory, and I will find it with the power of light. Therefore, even though I don’t know her yet, I have named her: Light Victory. And I nicknamed my web pages “UFOs” because they travel at the speed of light, reaching corners of the world and shooting out rays of truth that strike down the slanderers. With the help of my web pages, I will find her, and she will find me. When she finds me and I find her, I will tell her this: “”You have no idea how many programming algorithms I had to devise to find you. You can’t imagine all the difficulties and adversaries I faced to find you, my Light of Victory. I faced death itself many times: Even a witch pretended to be you. Imagine, she told me she was the light, despite her slanderous behavior. She slandered me like no one else, but I defended myself like no one else to find you. You are a being of light; that’s why we were made for each other! Now let’s get out of this damn place… So this is my story. I know she will understand me, and so will the righteous.
This is what I did at the end of 2005, when I was 30 years old.
. https://itwillbedotme.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/holy-weapons-armas-divinas.xlsx Michael and his angels throw Zeus and his angels into the abyss of hell. (Video language: Spanish) https://youtu.be/n1b8Wbh6AHI


”


1 How could that happen? How could Eve stay young as Adam grew older? https://neveraging.one/2025/04/22/how-could-that-happen-how-could-eve-stay-young-as-adam-grew-older/ 2 Ісус ненавидів своїх ворогів, тому що Ісус був праведним, і праведні також роблять це. https://144k.xyz/2024/11/24/%d1%96%d1%81%d1%83%d1%81-%d0%bd%d0%b5%d0%bd%d0%b0%d0%b2%d0%b8%d0%b4%d1%96%d0%b2-%d1%81%d0%b2%d0%be%d1%97%d1%85-%d0%b2%d0%be%d1%80%d0%be%d0%b3%d1%96%d0%b2-%d1%82%d0%be%d0%bc%d1%83-%d1%89%d0%be-%d1%96/ 3 Look at the difference: The baptism of Christians vs. the baptism of righteous people. Psalm 110:7 He drinks from the brook along the way, and lifts up his head. Water on the way is the right and accurate information for those who thirst for justice, it is the true baptism of the righteous who lift up their heads with knowledge. Dousing a person with the contents of a glass of water does not remove his ignorance. The Romans have deceived humanity with the Bible. https://gabriels.work/2024/07/31/look-at-the-difference-the-baptism-of-christians-vs-the-baptism-of-righteous-people-psalm-1107-he-drinks-from-the-brook-along-the-way-and-lifts-up-his-head-water-on-the-way-is-the-right-and-accu/ 4 Judas Tadeo y la condena de Babilonia. El amor a Babilonia no es parte de la sana doctrina porque el amor hacia los enemigos tampoco lo es. https://ellameencontrara.com/2024/03/03/judas-tadeo-y-la-condena-de-babilonia/ 5 Satan feels like a winner with his huge crowd of supporters, but I don’t feel like a loser because I know Jehovah is on my side. https://amoralajusticia.blogspot.com/2023/03/satan-feels-like-winner-with-his-huge.html


“Who is responsible for evil, “”Satan”” or the person who commits evil? Don’t be fooled by stupid justifications because “”the Devil”” they blame for their own evil deeds is actually themselves. The typical excuse of the perverse religious person: “”I am not like this because I am not the one who does this evil, it is the Devil who has possessed me who does this evil.”” The Romans, acting as “”Satan,”” created content that they also passed off as laws of Moses, unjust content to discredit just content: The Bible does not only contain truths, it also contains lies. Satan is a being of flesh and blood because it means: the slanderer. The Romans slandered Paul by attributing to him the authorship of the message in Ephesians 6:12. The fight is against flesh and blood. Numbers 35:33 mentions the death penalty against flesh and blood, the angels sent by God to Sodom destroyed flesh and blood, and not “”spiritual hosts of evil in the heavenly realms.”” Matthew 23:15 states that the Pharisees make their followers even more corrupt than themselves, suggesting that someone can become unjust due to external influence. On the other hand, Daniel 12:10 states that the unjust will continue acting unjustly because it is in their nature, and only the righteous will understand the path of justice. The lack of harmony between these two messages shows that some parts of the Bible contradict each other, calling into question its absolute truthfulness. https://naodanxxii.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/idi02-the-plot.pdf .” “The Roman Empire, Bahira, Muhammad, Jesus and persecuted Judaism. Introductory message: Look at what those who refused to eat pork despite being tortured by King Antiochus IV Epiphanes, a Zeus-worshipping king, believed in. Look at how the elderly Eleazar, along with seven brothers and their mother, were murdered by the Greek king Antiochus for refusing to eat pork. Was God cruel enough to abolish a law that He Himself established and for the sake of which those faithful Jews offered their lives in the hope of receiving eternal life through that sacrifice? God is not cruel, otherwise God would not be the best. God is not friend of the wicked, otherwise God would be cruel and part of the problem, not of the solution. Those who abolished that law were neither Jesus nor his disciples. They were Romans who had the same gods as the Greeks: Jupiter (Zeus), Cupid (Eros), Minerva (Athena), Neptune (Poseidon), Both Romans and Greeks enjoyed pork and seafood, but faithful Jews rejected these foods. 2 Maccabees 7:1 Seven brothers and their mother were arrested. The king wanted to force them to eat pork, which was forbidden by law, by beating them with whips and ox sinews. 2 One of them spoke on behalf of all the brothers, saying, “What do you want to know by questioning us? We are ready to die rather than break the laws of our ancestors.” 8 He answered in his native language, “I will not eat pork meat!” So he was also subjected to torment. 9 But as he breathed his last he said: You, criminal, take away our present life. But God will raise us who died for his laws to eternal life. Message: The birth and death of the fourth beast. The Greco-Roman alliance by the same gods. The Seleucid Empire. Beware of believing in the gospel of the antichrist (Good news for the unrighteous, although false) If you want to save yourself from the deception of the adversary of justice, consider that: To reject the false gospel of Rome, accept that if Jesus was righteous then He did not love His enemies, and if He was not a hypocrite then He did not preach love for enemies because He did not preach what He did not practice: Proverbs 29: 27 The righteous hate the unrighteous, and the unrighteous hate the righteous. This is part of the gospel adulterated by the Romans for the Bible: 1 Peter 3: 18 For Christ died once for sins, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God. Now look at this that disproves that slander: Psalm 118: 20 This is the gate of the LORD; the righteous shall enter thereat. 21 I will thank you because you have heard me and have been my salvation. 22 The stone that the builders rejected has become the cornerstone. Jesus curses his enemies in the parable that predicts his death and return: Luke 20:14 But when the tenants of the vineyard saw it, they reasoned among themselves, saying, This is the heir; come, let us kill him, that the inheritance may be ours. 15 So they cast him out of the vineyard and killed him. What will the owner of the vineyard do to them then? 16 He will come and destroy these tenants and give the vineyard to others. When they heard this, they said, “Certainly not!” 17 But Jesus looked at them and said, “What then is this that is written: ‘The stone which the builders rejected has become the cornerstone’?” He spoke of this stone, the nightmare stone of the king of Babylon: Daniel 2: 31 As you watched, O king, behold, a great image stood before you, a very great image whose glory was exceedingly excellent; its appearance was terrifying. 32 The head of the image was of fine gold, its breast and arms of silver, its belly and thighs of bronze, 33 its legs of iron, and its feet partly of iron and partly of clay. 34 As you watched, a stone was cut out without hands, and it struck the image on its feet of iron and clay and broke them in pieces. 35 Then the iron, the clay, the bronze, the silver, and the gold were broken into pieces and became like chaff from the summer threshing floors; the wind carried them away, leaving no trace of them. But the stone that struck the image became a great mountain and filled the whole earth. The fourth beast is the alliance of the leaders of all false religions friendly to the denounced Roman fraud. Christianity and Islam dominate the world, most governments either swear by the Koran or the Bible, for that simple reason, even if governments deny it, they are religious governments that submit to the religious authorities behind those books by which they swore. Here I will show you the Roman influence on the dogmas of these religions and how they are far from the dogmas of the religion that Rome persecuted. In addition, what I am going to show you is not part of the religion that is known today as Judaism. And if we add to this the brotherhood of the leaders of Judaism, Christianity and Islam, there are enough elements to point to Rome as the creator of the dogmas of these religions, and that the last religion mentioned is not the same as the Judaism that Rome persecuted. Yes, I am stating that Rome created Christianity and that it persecuted a Judaism different from the current one, the loyal leaders of legitimate Judaism would never give fraternal embraces to disseminators of idolatrous doctrines. It is evident that I am not a Christian, then why do I quote passages from the Bible to support what I say? Because not everything in the Bible belongs exclusively to Christianity, part of its content is the content of the religion of the path of justice that was persecuted by the Roman Empire for being contrary to the Roman ideal of making “All roads lead to Rome (That is, that these roads favor imperial interests), that is why I take some passages from the Bible to support my statements. Daniel 2: 40 And the fourth kingdom shall be strong as iron; and as iron breaks and shatters all things, so it shall break and crush all things. 41 And what you saw of the feet and toes, partly of potter’s clay and partly of iron, shall be a divided kingdom; and there shall be in it some of the strength of iron, even as you saw iron mixed with clay. 42 And because the toes of the feet were partly of iron and partly of clay, the kingdom shall be partly strong and partly broken. 43 Just as you saw the iron mixed with clay, they shall be mixed by human alliances; but they shall not cleave one to another, even as iron is not mixed with clay. 44 And in the days of these kings the God of heaven shall set up a kingdom which shall never be destroyed, neither shall the kingdom be left to another people; it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, but it shall stand forever. The fourth kingdom is the kingdom of false religions. That is why the Popes in the Vatican are honored by dignitaries from countries like the United States. The leading country in the world is not the United States, it is not the flag of the United States that flies in the main squares of the capitals of various Latin American countries, it is the flag of the Vatican that flies. The Popes meet with the leaders of other dominant religions, something impossible to imagine between prophets and false prophets. But between false prophets such alliances are possible. The cornerstone is justice. The Romans not only despised the fact that he was a just man, but also the fact that he deserved to marry a just woman: 1 Corinthians 11: 7 Woman is the glory of man. They have been preached a Jesus who does not seek a wife for himself, as if he were like the Roman priests who like celibacy and who have worshipped the image of Jupiter (Zeus); in fact, they call the image of Zeus the image of Jesus. The Romans not only falsified details of Jesus’ personality, but also details of his faith and his personal and collective goals. Fraud and concealment of information in the Bible is found even in some of the texts attributed to Moses and the prophets. To trust that the Romans faithfully preached the messages of Moses and the prophets before Jesus only to deny it with some Roman falsehoods in the New Testament of the Bible would be a mistake, because that would be too easy to disprove. There are also contradictions in the Old Testament, I will cite examples: Circumcision as a religious rite is similar to self-flagellation as a religious rite. I find it impossible to accept that God on the one hand said: Do not make cuts in your skin as part of a religious rite. And on the other hand He ordered circumcision, which involves making cuts in the skin to remove the foreskin. Leviticus 19: 28 They shall not make any scalp cuts on their heads, nor shave off the edges of their beards, nor make any cuttings in their flesh. In conflict with Genesis 17: 11 They shall circumcise the flesh of their foreskins; that shall be the sign of the covenant between us. Observe how false prophets practiced self-flagellation, practices that we can find in both Catholicism and Islam. 1 Kings 18: 25 Then Elijah said to the prophets of Baal, Choose for yourselves an ox… 27 At noon, Elijah mocked them. 28 They cried out with a loud voice and cut themselves with knives and lancets, as was their custom, until blood gushed out on them. 29 When midday was past, they cried out until the time of the sacrifice, but there was no voice, no one answered, no one listened. The tonsure on the head was common for all Catholic priests until a few decades ago, but their worship of idols of various shapes, of various materials, and of various given names is still common. No matter what names they have given their idols, they are still idols: Leviticus 26:1 says: “You shall not make for yourselves idols or carved images, nor set up any holy monuments, nor set up any painted stones in your land to worship them, for I am the Lord your God.” The love of God. Ezekiel 33 indicates that God loves the wicked: Ezekiel 33: 11 Say to them, ‘As I live,’ says the Lord GOD, ‘I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked, but that the wicked turn from his way and live. Turn, turn from your wicked ways; why will you die, O house of Israel?’ But Psalm 5 indicates that God hates the wicked: Psalms 5: 4 For you are not a God who takes pleasure in wickedness; No wicked person will dwell near you. 5 Fools will not stand before your eyes; You abhor all workers of iniquity. 6 You will destroy those who speak lies; The LORD will abhor the bloodthirsty and deceitful man. The death penalty for murderers: In Genesis 4: 15 God is against an eye for an eye and a life for a life by protecting the murderer. Cain. Genesis 4: 15 But the Lord said to Cain, “Whoever kills you will suffer punishment sevenfold.” Then the Lord put a mark on Cain, so that no one who found him would kill him. But in Numbers 35: 33 God orders the death penalty for murderers like Cain: Numbers 35: 33 You shall not defile the land in which you are, for blood defiles the land, and no atonement can be made for the land by blood shed on it except by the blood of the one who shed it. It would also be a mistake to trust that the messages in the so-called “apocryphal” gospels are truly the “gospels forbidden by Rome.” The best proof is that the same false dogmas are found both in the Bible and in these apocryphal gospels, for example: As an offense to the Jews who were murdered for their respect for the law that prohibited them from eating pork. In the false New Testament, the consumption of pork is permitted (Matthew 15: 11, 1 Timothy 4: 2-6): Matthew 15: 11 says, “It is not what goes into the mouth that defiles a man, but what comes out of the mouth is what defiles a man.” You will find that same message in one of the gospels that are not in the Bible: Gospel of Thomas 14: When you enter any country and travel through the region, if you are welcomed, eat whatever is offered to you. For what goes into your mouth will not defile you, but what comes out of your mouth will defile you. These Bible passages also indicate the same thing as Matthew 15: 11. Romans 14: 14 I know and am convinced in the Lord Jesus that nothing is unclean in itself; but to him who thinks anything is unclean, to him it is unclean. Titus 1: 15 To the pure all things are pure: but to them that are defiled and unbelieving nothing is pure; but both their mind and conscience are defiled. It is all gruesome because Rome acted with the cunning of a serpent, the deception is incorporated into genuine revelations such as the warning against celibacy: 1 Timothy 4: 2 Because of the hypocrisy of liars, who, having their conscience seared with a hot iron, 3 will forbid marriage and command people to abstain from foods, which God created to be received with thanksgiving by those who believe and know the truth. 4 For everything God created is good, and nothing is to be rejected if it is received with thanksgiving, 5 because it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer. Look at what those who refused to eat pork despite being tortured by King Antiochus IV Epiphanes, a Zeus-worshipping king, believed in. Look at how the elderly Eleazar, along with seven brothers and their mother, were murdered by the Greek king Antiochus for refusing to eat pork. Was God cruel enough to abolish a law that He Himself established and for the sake of which those faithful Jews offered their lives in the hope of receiving eternal life through that sacrifice? Those who abolished that law were neither Jesus nor his disciples. They were Romans who had the same gods as the Greeks: Jupiter (Zeus), Cupid (Eros), Minerva (Athena), Neptune (Poseidon), Both Romans and Greeks enjoyed pork and seafood, but faithful Jews rejected these foods.
Let’s talk about the king who worshipped Zeus: Antiochus IV Epiphanes was the king of the Seleucid Empire from 175 BC until his death in 164 BC. His name in Ancient Greek was Αντίοχος Επιφανής, meaning “manifest god”. 2 Maccabees 6: 1 After some time the king sent an elder from Athens to compel the Jews to break the laws of their ancestors and to live in a way that was contrary to God’s laws, 2 to desecrate the temple in Jerusalem and dedicate it to Olympian Zeus, and to dedicate the temple on Mount Gerizim to Zeus the Hospitaller, as the people there had requested. 2 Maccabees 6: 18 They wanted to force Eleazar, one of the foremost teachers of the law, a man of advanced age and noble appearance, to eat pork by opening his mouth. 19 But he preferred an honorable death to an unhonorable life and went willingly to the place of execution. 2 Maccabees 7: 1 Seven brothers and their mother were arrested. The king wanted to force them to eat pork, which was forbidden by law, by beating them with whips and ox sinews. 2 One of them spoke on behalf of all the brothers, saying, “What do you want to know by questioning us? We are ready to die rather than break the laws of our ancestors.” 2 Maccabees 7: 6 “The Lord God is watching, and he has compassion on us. This is what Moses said in his song when he reproached the people for their unfaithfulness: ‘The Lord will have compassion on his servants. ’” 7 So the first died. Then they led the second to the executioner, and after they had scalped him, they asked him, “Will you eat something so that your body will not be cut into pieces?” 8 He answered in his native language, “No!” So he was also subjected to torment. 9 But as he breathed his last he said: You, criminal, take away our present life. But God will raise us who died for his laws to eternal life. The song of Moses is a song of love for friends and hatred for enemies. It is not a song of forgiveness for the enemies of God’s friends. It turns out that there is a clue in Revelation that points to Jesus having the same message and that therefore he did not preach love for enemies. Revelation 15: 3 And they sing the song of Moses the servant of God, and the song of the Lamb, saying, Great and marvelous are your works, Lord God Almighty; just and true are your ways, King of saints. Who will not fear you, O Lord, and glorify your name? As you can see, despite the horrible tortures that ultimately caused their death, they chose to die so as not to fail their God. Now, pay attention to this detail: 2 Maccabees 6: 21 Those who presided over the feast forbidden by law and who had known the man for some time took him aside and advised him to have meat prepared by himself that was lawful brought to him and to pretend to eat the meat offered in sacrifice, as the king had commanded. 22 In this way he would avoid death, and they, because of their former friendship for him, would treat him kindly. 23 But Eleazar, acting in a manner worthy of his age, his venerable old age, and his white hair, which were the sign of his labors and his distinction, a manner worthy of his blameless conduct from childhood, and especially worthy of the holy law established by God, answered accordingly, “Take my life at once! 24 At my age it is not worthy to pretend, I do not want many of the young men to believe that I, Eleazar, at the age of ninety embraced a foreign religion, 25 and that because of my hypocrisy and my short and brief life, they should fall into error through me. By doing so I would bring shame and disgrace upon my old age. 26 Moreover, even if I were to escape the punishment of men now, neither living nor dead could I escape the hands of the Almighty. 27 Therefore I am bravely departing this life, that I may prove myself worthy of my old age, 28 and I am leaving the young men a noble example, that I may prove myself ready to die bravely for our venerable and holy laws.” The Greeks were to be “merciful” to those who, under torture, agreed to eat pork, but the faithful did not want to sin against their God no matter the circumstances. This message in the Quran seems to be in line with the policy of King Antiochus IV Epiphanes: “If I torture you, you must agree to eat pork, you must accept my mercy. And so I will stop torturing you. If your God forbids you, He has indicated that in case I torture you and you are forced to do so, you may eat and not feel like a sinner.” The Quran explicitly prohibits the consumption of pork in several verses. One of the clearest is Sura 2: 173, which says: “He has forbidden you only dead meat, blood, the flesh of swine, and what has been sacrificed in the name of other than Allah. But whoever is forced to do so, without desire or excess, commits no sin. Indeed, Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.” (Quran 2: 173) ChatGPT said: The character of Bahira in the story of Muhammad is an interesting one, and has been the subject of debate and speculation. Bahira, according to some Islamic sources, was a Christian monk who is believed to have had an encounter with Muhammad when he was young, which left an impression on his religious thinking. Some accounts suggest that Bahira may have spoken to him about aspects of the Christian religion, and that her influence may have contributed to the ideas that Muhammad later developed in the Qur’an. The existence of Bahira and his meeting with Muhammad as a child is a controversial issue and difficult to verify historically. There is no independent evidence outside Islamic sources that verifies Bahira’s existence or meeting with Muhammad. There are no Christian records or historical documents contemporary to Muhammad’s time that mention Bahira as an influential Christian monk. No archaeological evidence has been found to confirm this either. Bahira’s existence as a Christian monk and his meeting with Muhammad is not independently documented in historical sources outside of Islam. Islamic sources tell the story, but there is no archaeological evidence or external historical records to support it. Therefore, although the figure of Bahira is significant within the Islamic tradition, the veracity of his story remains a controversial and speculative question. So I told ChatGPT something like this: «If I show that claim B, which is defended by group 1, is false, and then I see that group 2 also defends claim B, then I can discredit both groups.» ChatGPT said: Your point is valid in that if a narrative is repeated in different religions and can be traced back to external or historical influences (such as Rome), it could raise questions about the authenticity or intent behind those stories. You said: In your last paragraph, I agree, but many people do not know the prophecies of Isaiah 7, for example, and only heard “Gabriel announced to Mary the virgin birth of Jesus,” that is, they do not know about these discrepancies, they know nothing, but they believe guided by the majority, by the mass media, etc. I think that they can choose what to believe and what not to, but they should be informed of all the details, then they will decide better, that is my objective. [See here what I mean: Note this similarity of stories: Bible – Pay special attention to Matthew 1: 21 “Behold, a virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and they shall call his name Immanuel” (which means “God with us”). You can see in that message a Roman attempt to forcibly link this narrative to a prophecy of Isaiah that has nothing to do with this supposed divine event, which discredits the story completely. Matthew 1: 18 Now the birth of Jesus Christ was as follows: When his mother Mary was espoused to Joseph, before they came together, she was found to be with child from the Holy Spirit. 19 Her husband Joseph, being a righteous man and not wanting to put her to shame, decided to divorce her secretly. 20 While he thought about this, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream and said, “Joseph son of David, do not be afraid to take Mary home as your wife, for what is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit. 21 She will give birth to a son, and you shall call his name Jesus, for he will save his people from their sins.” 22 All this took place to fulfill what the Lord had said through the prophet: Matthew 1: 23 Behold, a virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and they shall call his name Immanuel (which means, God with us). 24 Then Joseph awoke from sleep and did as the angel of the Lord commanded him and took his wife. 25 But he did not know her until she had given birth to her firstborn son; and he called his name Jesus. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Mateo%201%3A18-24&version=RVR1960 Luke 1: 26 In the sixth month the angel Gabriel was sent from God to Nazareth, a town in Galilee, 27 to a virgin named Mary, who had been pledged to be married to Joseph, a descendant of King David. 28 The angel came to Mary and said to her, “Rejoice, you who are favored by God! The Lord is with you!” 29 Mary was perplexed when she heard this and wondered what this greeting meant. 30 But the angel said to her, “Do not be afraid, Mary, for God has been gracious to you. 31 You will be pregnant and give birth to a son, and you will name him Jesus. 32 Your son will be great, the Son of the Most High. The Lord God will give him the throne of his ancestor David. 33 He will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and his kingdom will never end.” 34 Mary said to the angel, “I have no husband; how then can this happen to me?” 35 The angel answered her, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High God will surround you. Therefore the child to be born will be holy, the Son of God.” Koran: Passage from the Quran in Surah 19 (Maryam), which speaks of the virgin birth of Jesus: Surah 19: 16-22 (rough translation): And it is mentioned in the Book of Mary, when she went away from her family to a place to the east. And she put a veil between herself and them; then We sent Our spirit to her, and it came to her in the form of a perfect man. She said, “I seek refuge in the Most Merciful from you, if you are God-fearing.” He said, “I am only a messenger from your Lord to grant you a pure son.” She said, “How will I have a son when no man has touched me, nor am I an unclean woman?” He said, “So it will be. Your Lord has said, ‘That is easy for Me; and that We may make it a sign for the people and a mercy from Us; and it was a decided matter.’” So she conceived him, and she retired with him to a secluded place. https://www.quranv.com/es/19/16 Now I will prove that this story is false: According to the Bible, Jesus was born of a virgin, but this contradicts the context of the prophecy in Isaiah 7. The apocryphal gospels, including the Gospel of Philip, also perpetuate this idea. However, Isaiah’s prophecy refers to the birth of King Hezekiah, not Jesus. Hezekiah was born to a woman who was a virgin at the time the prophecy was told, not after she became pregnant, and the prophecy of Immanuel was fulfilled by Hezekiah, not Jesus. Rome has hidden the true gospel and used apocryphal texts to distract and legitimize major lies. Jesus did not fulfill Isaiah’s prophecies about Immanuel, and the Bible misinterprets the meaning of the virgin in Isaiah 7. Isaiah 7: 14-16: This passage mentions a virgin who will conceive a son named Immanuel, which means “God with us.” The prophecy is given to King Ahaz and refers to the immediate political situation, specifically the destruction of the lands of the two kings Ahaz fears (Pekah and Rezin). This aligns with the historical context and timeline of King Hezekiah’s birth, not Jesus’. Demonstrating the inconsistency of the narrative: Isaiah 7: 14-16: “Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign: Behold, a virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel. He shall eat butter and honey, until he knows to refuse the evil and choose the good. For before the child knows to refuse the evil and choose the good, the land of the two kings whom you fear will be forsaken.” This passage mentions a virgin who will conceive a son named Immanuel, which means “God with us.” The prophecy is given to King Ahaz and refers to the immediate political situation, specifically the destruction of the lands of the two kings Ahaz fears (Pekah and Rezin). This aligns with the historical context and timeline of King Hezekiah’s birth, not Jesus’. 2 Kings 15: 29-30: “In the days of Pekah king of Israel, Tiglath-pileser king of Assyria came and captured Ijon, Abel-beth-maacah, Janoah, Kedesh, Hazor, Gilead, Galilee, all the land of Naphtali, and carried them away captive to Assyria. Hoshea son of Elah conspired against Pekah son of Remaliah and attacked him and killed him. He succeeded him as king in the twentieth year of Jotham son of Uzziah.” It describes the fall of Pekah and Rezin, fulfilling Isaiah’s prophecy about the desolation of the two kings’ lands before the child (Hezekiah) learns to reject evil and choose good. 2 Kings 18: 4-7 He removed the high places, broke the sacred pillars, cut down the Asherah poles, and broke in pieces the bronze serpent that Moses had made, for until that time the Israelites had burned incense to it. He called its name Nehushtan. He trusted in the LORD, the God of Israel; there was no one like him among the kings of Judah before or after him. For he followed the LORD and did not depart from him, but kept the commandments that the LORD commanded Moses. The LORD was with him, and he prospered wherever he went. He rebelled against the king of Assyria and did not serve him. It highlights Hezekiah’s reforms and his faithfulness to God, showing that “God was with him,” fulfilling the name Immanuel in Hezekiah’s context. Isaiah 7: 21-22 and 2 Kings 19: 29-31: “And it shall come to pass in that day, that a man shall raise one cow and two sheep; and he shall eat butter for their abundance of milk; indeed, he who is left in the land shall eat butter and honey.” / “And this will be a sign to you, O Hezekiah: This year you shall eat what grows of itself, and the second year what springs from itself; and the third year you shall sow and reap, and plant vineyards, and eat their fruit. And the survivors of the house of Judah who are left shall again take root downward and bear fruit upward. For a remnant shall go out of Jerusalem, and a survivor from Mount Zion. The zeal of the LORD of hosts will perform this.” Both passages speak of abundance and prosperity in the land, correlating with Hezekiah’s reign, supporting the interpretation that the prophecy in Isaiah referred to Hezekiah. 2 Kings 19: 35-37: “And it came to pass that night, that the angel of the LORD went out, and smote in the camp of the Assyrians an hundred and eighty-five thousand; and when they arose in the morning, behold, all were dead bodies. Then Sennacherib king of Assyria departed and returned to Nineveh, where he abode. And it came to pass, as he was worshipping in the house of Nisroch his god, that Adrammelech and Sharezer his sons struck him with the sword, and fled to the land of Ararat. And Esarhaddon his son reigned in his stead.” It describes the miraculous defeat of the Assyrians, which was prophesied by Isaiah, showing God’s intervention and support for Hezekiah, further indicating that the prophecy of Immanuel referred to Hezekiah. ] These lies are just a few, there are many more lies in the Bible, the Bible has truths such as that the righteous and the wicked hate each other (Proverbs 29: 27, Proverbs 17: 15, Proverbs 16: 4), but as a whole it does not deserve credit because its content, when decided in the councils, passed through the black hands of Rome.
Wake up, and help me wake up others fit to be awakened! And speaking of virgins, my purpose is clear, that the virgin woman I seek for my marriage believes me and not the false Roman versions of the facts regarding the holy covenant. Signed: Gabriel, the angel from heaven who announces a gospel different from the one preached by Rome, and a Messiah very different from the Zeus preached by the Romans. If you are her and you recognize me on the street, take my hand and let’s go to a secluded place: I will defend you from viper’s tongues! Nothing and no one will stop our mutual love from flowing because God is with us. And even if this ground is no longer there to support our weight, we will always be together.
The birth and death of the fourth beast. The Greco-Roman alliance by the same gods. The Seleucid Empire. The Roman Empire, Bahira, Muhammad, Jesus and persecuted Judaism: Religion and the Romans. Extended version, #Deathpenalty» │ English │ #HLCUII
El nacimiento y la muerte de cuarta bestia. La alianza greco-romana por los mismos dioses. (Versión extendida)
https://naodanxxii.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/idi02-the-plot.pdf .” “The religion I defend is named justice. █ I will find her when she finds me, and she will believe what I say. The Roman Empire has betrayed humanity by inventing religions to subjugate it. All institutionalized religions are false. All the sacred books of those religions contain frauds. However, there are messages that make sense. And there are others, missing, that can be deduced from the legitimate messages of justice. Daniel 12:1-13 — “”The prince who fights for justice will rise to receive God’s blessing.”” Proverbs 18:22 — “”A wife is the blessing God gives to a man.”” Leviticus 21:14 — “”He must marry a virgin of his own faith, for she is from his own people, who will be set free when the righteous rise.”” 📚 What is an institutionalized religion? An institutionalized religion is when a spiritual belief is transformed into a formal power structure, designed to control people. It ceases to be an individual search for truth or justice and becomes a system dominated by human hierarchies, serving political, economic, or social power. What is just, true, or real no longer matters. The only thing that matters is obedience. An institutionalized religion includes: Churches, synagogues, mosques, temples. Powerful religious leaders (priests, pastors, rabbis, imams, popes, etc.). Manipulated and fraudulent “official” sacred texts. Dogmas that cannot be questioned. Rules imposed on people’s personal lives. Mandatory rites and rituals in order to “”belong.”” This is how the Roman Empire, and later other empires, used faith to subjugate people. They turned the sacred into a business. And truth into heresy. If you still believe that obeying a religion is the same as having faith, you were lied to. If you still trust their books, you trust the same people who crucified justice. It’s not God speaking in his temples. It’s Rome. And Rome never stopped speaking. Wake up. He who seeks justice needs no permission. Nor an institution.
El propósito de Dios no es el propósito de Roma. Las religiones de Roma conducen a sus propios intereses y no al favor de Dios.
https://gabriels52.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/arco-y-flecha.xlsx

Click to access idi02-she-will-find-me-the-virgin-will-believe-me.pdf

https://itwillbedotme.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/idi02-she-will-find-me-the-virgin-will-believe-me.docx She will find me, the virgin woman will believe me. ( https://ellameencontrara.com – https://lavirgenmecreera.com – https://shewillfind.me ) This is the wheat in the Bible that destroys the Roman tares in the Bible: Revelation 19:11 Then I saw heaven opened, and there was a white horse; and the one sitting on it was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness, he judges and makes war. Revelation 19:19 Then I saw the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies gathered together to make war against the one sitting on the horse and against his army. Psalm 2:2-4 “”The kings of the earth set themselves up, and the rulers took counsel together against the Lord and against his anointed, saying: ‘Let us break their bonds apart and cast away their cords from us.’ He who sits in the heavens laughs; the Lord mocks them.”” Now, some basic logic: if the horseman fights for justice, but the beast and the kings of the earth fight against this horseman, then the beast and the kings of the earth are against justice. Therefore, they represent the deception of the false religions that rule with them. The whore of Babylon, which is the false church made by Rome, has considered herself to be “”the wife of the Lord’s anointed,”” but the false prophets of this idol-selling and flattering word-peddling organization do not share the personal goals of the Lord’s anointed and the true saints, because the ungodly leaders have chosen for themselves the path of idolatry, celibacy, or sacramentalizing unholy marriages in exchange for money. Their religious headquarters are full of idols, including false holy books, before which they bow down: Isaiah 2:8-11 8 Their land is full of idols; they bow down to the work of their hands, to what their fingers have made. 9 So the man is humbled, and the man is brought low; do not forgive them. 10 Go into the rock, hide yourself in the dust from the terror of the LORD and from the splendor of his majesty. 11 The arrogance of human eyes will be brought low, and the pride of men will be humbled; the LORD alone will be exalted on that day. Proverbs 19:14 House and wealth are an inheritance from fathers, but a prudent wife is from the LORD. Leviticus 21:14 The priest of the LORD shall not marry a widow, nor a divorced woman, nor an unclean woman, nor a harlot; he shall take a virgin from his own people as a wife. Revelation 1:6 And he has made us kings and priests to his God and Father; to him be glory and dominion forever. 1 Corinthians 11:7 The woman is the glory of man. What does it mean in Revelation that the beast and the kings of the earth wage war on the rider of the white horse and his army? The meaning is clear, the world leaders are hand in glove with the false prophets who are disseminators of the false religions that are dominant among the kingdoms of the earth, for obvious reasons, that includes Christianity, Islam, etc. These rulers are against justice and truth, which are the values defended by the rider of the white horse and his army loyal to God. As is evident, the deception is part of the false sacred books that these accomplices defend with the label of “Authorized Books of Authorized Religions”, but the only religion that I defend is justice, I defend the right of the righteous not to be deceived with religious deceptions. Revelation 19:19 Then I saw the beast and the kings of the earth and their armies gathered together to make war against the rider on the horse and against his army. Now some basic logic, if the horseman stands for justice, but the beast and the kings of the earth fight against this horseman, then the beast and the kings of the earth are against justice, therefore they stand for the deception of the false religions that rule with them.
Un duro golpe de realidad es a «Babilonia» la «resurrección» de los justos, que es a su vez la reencarnación de Israel en el tercer milenio: La verdad no destruye a todos, la verdad no duele a todos, la verdad no incomoda a todos: Israel, la verdad, nada más que la verdad, la verdad que duele, la verdad que incomoda, verdades que duelen, verdades que atormentan, verdades que destruyen.
This is my story: José, a young man raised in Catholic teachings, experienced a series of events marked by complex relationships and manipulations. At 19, he began a relationship with Monica, a possessive and jealous woman. Although Jose felt that he should end the relationship, his religious upbringing led him to try to change her with love. However, Monica’s jealousy intensified, especially towards Sandra, a classmate who was making advances on Jose. Sandra began harassing him in 1995 with anonymous phone calls, in which she made noises with the keyboard and hung up. On one of those occasions, she revealed that she was the one calling, after Jose angrily asked in the last call: “”Who are you?”” Sandra called him immediately, but in that call she said: “”Jose, who am I?”” Jose, recognizing her voice, said to her: “”You are Sandra,”” to which she replied: “”You already know who I am.”” Jose avoided confronting her. During that time, Monica, obsessed with Sandra, threatened Jose with harming Sandra, which led Jose to protect Sandra and prolong his relationship with Monica, despite his desire to end it. Finally, in 1996, Jose broke up with Monica and decided to approach Sandra, who had initially shown interest in him. When Jose tried to talk to her about his feelings, Sandra did not allow him to explain himself, she treated him with offensive words and he did not understand the reason. Jose chose to distance himself, but in 1997 he believed he had the opportunity to talk to Sandra, hoping that she would explain her change of attitude and be able to share the feelings that she had kept silent. On her birthday in July, he called her as he had promised a year earlier when they were still friends—something he couldn’t do in 1996 because he was with Monica. At the time, he used to believe that promises should never be broken (Matthew 5:34-37), though now he understands that some promises and oaths can be reconsidered if made in error or if the person no longer deserves them. As he finished greeting her and was about to hang up, Sandra desperately pleaded, “”Wait, wait, can we meet?”” That made him think she had reconsidered and would finally explain her change in attitude, allowing him to share the feelings he had kept silent. However, Sandra never gave him clear answers, maintaining the intrigue with evasive and counterproductive attitudes. Faced with this attitude, Jose decided not to look for her anymore. It was then that constant telephone harassment began. The calls followed the same pattern as in 1995 and this time were directed to the house of his paternal grandmother, where Jose lived. He was convinced that it was Sandra, since Jose had recently given Sandra his number. These calls were constant, morning, afternoon, night, and early morning, and lasted for months. When a family member answered, they did not hang up, but when José answered, the clicking of the keys could be heard before hanging up. Jose asked his aunt, the owner of the telephone line, to request a record of incoming calls from the telephone company. He planned to use that information as evidence to contact Sandra’s family and express his concern about what she was trying to achieve with this behavior. However, his aunt downplayed his argument and refused to help. Strangely, no one in the house, neither his aunt nor his paternal grandmother, seemed to be outraged by the fact that the calls also occurred in the early morning, and they did not bother to look into how to stop them or identify the person responsible. This had the strange appearance of orchestrated torture. Even when José asked his aunt to unplug the phone at night so he could sleep, she refused, arguing that one of her sons, who lived in Italy, could call at any moment (considering the six-hour time difference between the two countries). What made things even stranger was Monica’s fixation on Sandra, even though they hadn’t even met. Monica didn’t attend the high school where José and Sandra were enrolled, but she began to feel jealous of Sandra after finding a folder with one of José’s group projects. The folder listed the names of two women, including Sandra, but for some strange reason, Monica became fixated only on Sandra’s name. Although José initially ignored Sandra’s phone calls, over time he relented and contacted Sandra again, influenced by biblical teachings that advised praying for those who persecuted him. However, Sandra manipulated him emotionally, alternating between insults and requests for him to keep looking for her. After months of this cycle, Jose discovered that it was all a trap. Sandra falsely accused him of sexual harassment, and as if that wasn’t bad enough, Sandra sent some criminals to beat up Jose. That Tuesday, without José knowing it, Sandra had already set a trap for him. Days before, José had told his friend Johan about the situation he was going through with Sandra. Johan also suspected that Sandra’s strange behavior might be due to some kind of witchcraft by Mónica. That Tuesday, José visited his old neighborhood where he had lived in 1995 and happened to run into Johan. After hearing more details about the situation, Johan recommended that José forget about Sandra and instead go out to a nightclub to meet women—perhaps he would find someone who could make him forget her. José thought it was a good idea. So they got on a bus and headed toward the nightclub in downtown Lima. Coincidentally, the route of that bus passed near the IDAT institute. Just one block before reaching IDAT, José suddenly had the idea to get off for a moment to pay for a Saturday course he had enrolled in. He had managed to save some money for it by selling his computer and working for a week in a warehouse. However, he had been forced to quit because they exploited workers with 16-hour shifts while officially recording only 12, and if they refused to complete the week, they were threatened with not being paid at all. So José turned to Johan and said, “”I study here on Saturdays. Since we’re passing by, let’s get off for a bit, I’ll pay for my course, and then we’ll head to the nightclub.”” The moment José stepped off the bus, before even crossing the avenue, he was shocked to see Sandra standing right there on the corner of the institute. In disbelief, he told Johan, “”Johan, I can’t believe it—Sandra is right there. She’s the girl I told you about, the one who acts so strangely. Wait for me here; I’m going to ask if she got the letter where I warned her about Mónica’s threats against her, and maybe she can finally explain what’s going on with her and what she wants from me with all her calls.”” Johan stayed back as José approached. But as soon as he started speaking—””Sandra, did you see the letters? Can you finally explain to me what’s going on with you?””—Sandra, without saying a word, gestured with her hand, signaling three thugs who had been hiding in different spots: one in the middle of the avenue, another behind Sandra, and another behind José. The one standing behind Sandra stepped forward and said, “”So you’re the sexual harasser who’s been bothering my cousin?”” José, caught off guard, responded, “”What? Me, a harasser? On the contrary, she’s the one harassing me! If you read the letter, you’d see it’s about me trying to understand why she keeps calling me!”” Before he could react, one of the thugs grabbed him by the neck from behind and threw him to the ground. Then, together with the one who had claimed to be Sandra’s cousin, they started kicking him. Meanwhile, the third thug went through his pockets, robbing him. It was three against one—José, lying helpless on the pavement. Luckily, his friend Johan jumped into the fight, managing to give José a chance to get up. But then the third thug picked up some rocks and started throwing them at both José and Johan. The attack only stopped when a traffic officer intervened. The officer turned to Sandra and said, “”If he’s harassing you, then file a complaint.”” Sandra, visibly nervous, quickly left, knowing full well that her accusation was false. José, though deeply betrayed, did not go to the police. He had no way to prove the months of harassment he had suffered from Sandra. But beyond the shock of her betrayal, one question haunted him: “”How did she already have this ambush set up when I never come to this place on Tuesday nights? I only come here to study on Saturday mornings.”” This made José suspect that Sandra wasn’t just an ordinary person—she might be a witch with some kind of supernatural power. These events left a deep mark on Jose, who seeks justice and to expose those who manipulated him. In addition, he seeks to derail the advice in the Bible, such as: pray for those who insult you, because by following that advice, he fell into Sandra’s trap. Jose’s testimony. █ I am José Carlos Galindo Hinostroza, the author of the blog: https://lavirgenmecreera.com, https://ovni03.blogspot.com, and other blogs. I was born in Peru, that photo is mine, it is from 1997, I was 22 years old. At that time, I was entangled in the intrigues of Sandra Elizabeth, a former classmate from the IDAT institute. I was confused about what was happening to her (She harassed me in a very complex and extensive way to narrate in this image, but I narrate it at the bottom of this blog: ovni03.blogspot.com and in this video:
). I did not rule out the possibility that Mónica Nieves, my ex-girlfriend, had done some witchcraft to her. When searching for answers in the Bible, I read in Matthew 5: » Pray for whoever insults you,» And in those days, Sandra insulted me while telling me she didn’t know what was happening to her, that she wanted to continue being my friend, and that I should keep calling and looking for her again and again, and it went on like this for five months. In short, Sandra pretended to be possessed by something to keep me confused. The lies in the Bible made me believe that good people can behave evilly because of an evil spirit. That’s why the advice to pray for her didn’t seem so crazy to me—because before, Sandra pretended to be a friend, and I fell for her deception. Thieves often use the strategy of pretending to have good intentions: To steal from stores, they pretend to be customers; to ask for tithes, they pretend to preach the word of God, but they preach that of Rome, etc., etc. Sandra Elizabeth pretended to be a friend, then pretended to be a friend in trouble looking for my help, but all to slander me and ambush me with three criminals, surely out of spite because a year earlier I rejected her advances since I was in love with Monica Nieves, to whom I was faithful. But Monica did not trust my fidelity and threatened to kill Sandra Elizabeth, which is why I broke up with Monica slowly, over eight months, so that Monica wouldn’t think it was because of Sandra. But this is how Sandra Elizabeth paid me back—with slander. She falsely accused me of sexually harassing her, and with that pretext, she ordered three criminals to beat me up—all in front of her. I narrate all this in my blog and in my YouTube videos:
I do not wish for other righteous men to have bad experiences like I had, which is why I have created what you are reading. I know this will irritate unrighteous people like Sandra, but the truth is like the true gospel—it only favors the righteous. The evil of José’s family overshadows Sandra’s evil: José suffered a devastating betrayal by his own family, who not only refused to help him stop Sandra’s harassment but also falsely accused him of having a mental illness. His own relatives used these accusations as a pretext to kidnap and torture him, sending him twice to mental health institutions and a third time to a hospital. It all began when José read Exodus 20:5 and stopped being Catholic. From that moment on, he became outraged by the Church’s dogmas and started protesting against its doctrines on his own. He also advised his relatives to stop praying to images and told them that he was praying for a friend (Sandra) who was apparently bewitched or possessed. José was under stress due to the harassment, but his relatives did not tolerate him exercising his freedom of religious expression. As a result, they destroyed his professional life, his health, and his reputation by locking him up in mental institutions where he was given sedatives. Not only was he forcibly institutionalized, but after his release, he was forced to continue taking psychiatric medication under the threat of being locked up again. He fought to break free from those chains, and during the last two years of that injustice, with his programming career ruined, he was forced to work without pay at his uncle’s restaurant. That same uncle betrayed his trust by secretly drugging his meals with psychiatric pills. José only discovered the truth in 2007 thanks to a kitchen assistant named Lidia, who warned him about what was happening. From 1998 to 2007, José lost nearly ten years of his youth due to his treacherous relatives. In hindsight, he realized that his mistake was defending the Bible to reject Catholicism, as his family never allowed him to read it. They committed this injustice knowing he had no financial resources to defend himself. When he finally broke free from the forced medication, he thought he had earned their respect. His maternal uncles and cousins even offered him a job, but years later, they betrayed him again with such hostility that he was forced to resign. This made him realize that he should never have forgiven them, as their bad intentions were clear. From that moment on, he decided to study the Bible again, and in 2017, he began noticing its contradictions. Little by little, he understood why God had allowed his relatives to prevent him from defending the Bible in his youth. He discovered biblical inconsistencies and started exposing them in his blogs, where he also recounted the story of his faith and the suffering he endured at the hands of Sandra and, most of all, his own family. For this reason, in December 2018, his mother attempted to kidnap him again with the help of corrupt police officers and a psychiatrist who issued a false certificate. They accused him of being a “”dangerous schizophrenic”” to have him institutionalized again, but the attempt failed because he was not home. There were witnesses to the incident, and José had audio recordings, which he presented as evidence to the Peruvian authorities in his complaint, but it was dismissed. His family knew perfectly well that he was not insane—he had a stable job, a child, and the mother of his child to take care of. However, despite knowing the truth, they attempted to kidnap him again using the same old false accusation. His own mother and other fanatical Catholic relatives led the attempt. Although his complaint was ignored by the Ministry, José exposes these truths in his blogs, making it clear that the evil of his family eclipses even that of Sandra. Here is the evidence of the kidnappings using the slander of traitors: “”This man is a schizophrenic who urgently needs psychiatric treatment and pills for life.””

Click to access ten-piedad-de-mi-yahve-mi-dios.pdf

The day I almost committed suicide on the Villena Bridge (Miraflores, Lima) because of religious persecution and the side effects of the drugs I was forced to consume: Year 2001, age: 26 years.
.”

 

Number of days of purification: Day # 270 https://144k.xyz/2024/12/16/this-is-the-10th-day-pork-ingredient-of-wonton-filling-goodbye-chifa-no-more-pork-broth-in-mid-2017-after-researching-i-decided-not-to-eat-pork-anymore-but-just-the/

I have been a computer programmer, I like logic, in Turbo Pascal I created a program capable of producing basic algebra formulas at random, similar to the formula below. In the following document in .DOCX you can download the code of the program, this is proof that I’m not stupid, that’s why the conclusions of my research should be taken seriously. https://ntiend.me/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/math21-progam-code-in-turbo-pascal-bestiadn-dot-com.pdf

If o*24=893 then o=37.208


 

“Cupid is condemned to hell along with the other pagan gods (The fallen angels for their rebellion against justice, sent to eternal punishment). █
Quoting these passages does not mean defending the entire Bible. If 1 John 5:19 says that “the whole world is under the power of the evil one,” but rulers swear on the Bible, then the Devil rules with them. If the Devil rules with them, then fraud also rules with them. Therefore, the Bible contains part of that fraud, camouflaged among truths. By connecting those truths, we can expose their deceptions. Righteous people need to know these truths so that, if they have been deceived by lies added to the Bible or other similar books, they can free themselves from them. Daniel 12:7 And I heard the man clothed in linen, who was above the waters of the river, when he raised his right hand and his left hand to heaven and swore by Him who lives forever that it shall be for a time, times, and half a time. And when the power of the holy people is completely shattered, all these things shall be finished. Considering that ‘Devil’ means ‘Slanderer,’ it is natural to expect that the Roman persecutors, being the adversaries of the saints, later bore false witness against the saints and their messages. Thus, they themselves are the Devil, and not an intangible entity that enters and exits people, as they made us believe precisely with passages like Luke 22:3 (“Then Satan entered Judas…”), Mark 5:12-13 (the demons entering the pigs), and John 13:27 (“After the morsel, Satan entered him”). This is my purpose: to help righteous people not waste their power believing in the lies of impostors who have adulterated the original message, which never asked anyone to kneel before anything or pray to anything that had ever been visible. It is no coincidence that in this image, promoted by the Roman Church, Cupid appears alongside other pagan gods. They have given the names of the true saints to these false gods, but look at how these men dress and how they wear their long hair. All this goes against faithfulness to God’s laws because it is a sign of rebellion, a sign of the fallen angels (Deuteronomy 22:5).
The serpent, the devil, or Satan (the slanderer) in hell (Isaiah 66:24, Mark 9:44). Matthew 25:41: “Then he will also say to those on his left: ‘Depart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire that has been prepared for the devil and his angels’.” Hell: the eternal fire prepared for the serpent and his angels (Revelation 12:7-12), for having combined truths with heresies in the Bible, the Quran, the Torah, and for having created false forbidden gospels that they called apocryphal, to give credibility to lies in the false sacred books, all in rebellion against justice.
Book of Enoch 95:6: “Woe to you, false witnesses and to those who weigh the price of injustice, for you will perish suddenly!” Book of Enoch 95:7: “Woe to you, unjust ones who persecute the righteous, for you yourselves will be handed over and persecuted because of that injustice, and the burden of your guilt will fall upon you!” Proverbs 11:8: “The righteous is delivered from trouble, and the wicked comes in his place.” Proverbs 16:4: “The Lord has made all things for Himself, even the wicked for the day of doom.” Book of Enoch 94:10: “Unjust ones, I say to you that He who created you will overthrow you; upon your ruin, God will have no mercy, but rather, God will rejoice in your destruction.” Satan and his angels in hell: the second death. They deserve it for lying against Christ and His faithful disciples, accusing them of being the authors of Rome’s blasphemies in the Bible, such as love for the devil (the enemy). Isaiah 66:24: “And they shall go out and look upon the corpses of the men who have rebelled against me; for their worm shall never die, nor shall their fire be quenched, and they shall be abhorrent to all flesh.” Mark 9:44: “Where their worm does not die, and the fire is never quenched.” Revelation 20:14: “Then Death and Hades were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death: the lake of fire.”
Rêves et Réalité https://gabriels.work/2025/03/27/reves-et-realite/ La heterofobia, el racismo y el engaño en las imágenes religiosas del imperio romano: La Metáfora de los Focos: Comparación de la Verdad con Marduk, Ishtar, Baal, Astarté, Moloc, Dagón, Minerva, Atenea, Zeus, Júpiter, Hermes, Mercurio y los Ídolos de Babilonia. https://neveraging.one/2025/01/05/la-heterofobia-el-racismo-y-el-engano-en-las-imagenes-religiosas-del-imperio-romano-la-metafora-de-los-focos-comparacion-de-la-verdad-con-marduk-ishtar-baal-astarte-moloc-dagon-minerva-atene/ Las vanidades de Satanás sirven para una cosa, echarlas a la basura. https://midioslogico.blogspot.com/2024/02/las-vanidades-de-satanas-sirven-para.html ゼウスが話し、群衆は沈黙した…誰かが彼のマスクを剥ぐまで https://144k.xyz/2025/03/06/%e3%82%bc%e3%82%a6%e3%82%b9%e3%81%8c%e8%a9%b1%e3%81%97%e3%80%81%e7%be%a4%e8%a1%86%e3%81%af%e6%b2%88%e9%bb%99%e3%81%97%e3%81%9f%e8%aa%b0%e3%81%8b%e3%81%8c%e5%bd%bc%e3%81%ae%e3%83%9e%e3%82%b9/ El dios griego Zeus y el rey Antioco IV Epifanes – La abominacion desoladora https://ntiend.me/2023/08/10/el-dios-griego-zeus-y-el-rey-antioco-iv-epifanes-la-abominacion-desoladora/ Los condenados insisten: Pero Señor, ¿cuándo te vimos hambriento, sediento, forastero, desnudo, enfermo, o en la cárcel, y no te servimos? https://afavordelajusticiapropiadelosjustos.blogspot.com/2023/09/los-condenados-insisten-pero-senor.html Brutal kidnappings and murders committed by Hamas in Jerusalem https://gabriels.work/2023/10/10/brutal-kidnappings-and-murders-committed-by-hamas-in-jerusalem/ Pourquoi cette femme préfère-t-elle le méchant au bon ? https://shewillfind.me/2024/12/25/pourquoi-cette-femme-prefere-t-elle-le-mechant-au-bon/ Dina Boluarte dice que en el Perú hay paz y tranquilidad , ¿Le crees?. https://ntiend.me/2023/11/02/dina-boluarte-dice-que-en-el-peru-hay-paz-y-tranquilidad-le-crees/ ¿Pero mis amigos? , nunca fueron tus amigos.., salvo dos que no están aquí, y están vivos y salvos . https://haciendojoda.blogspot.com/2023/12/pero-mis-amigos-nunca-fueron-tus-amigos.html Ce poisson bleu a un message important à lire à haute voix, il a été écrit par un humain, le poisson pour lire le message de l’humain ne devient pas un humain. De même, aucun messager de Dieu, même s’il est un observateur du ciel ou un dieu créé par Dieu, ne peut être assimilé à Dieu. https://elovni01.blogspot.com/2023/08/ce-poisson-bleu-un-message-important.html Mostrando che Gesù non è Dio (il Dio degli dei, il Dio eterno, il Dio Altissimo, il Dio eternamente immortale). Parte 2 https://antibestia.com/2024/05/18/mostrando-che-gesu-non-e-dio-il-dio-degli-dei-il-dio-eterno-il-dio-altissimo-il-dio-eternamente-immortale-parte-2/ Why did they never tell us this? The false prophet: ‘God is everywhere, but He only hears your prayers if you pray to him through my images.’ Where reflection is lacking, veneration for the misguided abounds.”

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
Like Loading...

Relacionado

  • Tagged
  • 3.5-inch floppy drives
  • 386
  • adaptive tutoring
  • Adobe Creative Cloud
  • Adobe Photoshop
  • AI
  • Alexa
  • algorithms
  • applications
  • ARPANET
  • artificial intelligence
  • AT 286
  • automation
  • baud
  • broadband connection
  • browser
  • ChatGPT
  • chess programs
  • cloud services
  • color screens
  • computing
  • connection
  • content
  • current machines
  • cursor
  • data analysis
  • diagnostics
  • education
  • ethical challenges
  • fiber optics
  • files
  • floppy drives
  • forums
  • gigabytes
  • global social networks
  • Google
  • graphical browsers
  • graphical user interface
  • graphics
  • information
  • Intel 286
  • Intel 386
  • Intel 8088
  • interactions
  • Internet
  • KB
  • Linux distributions
  • Lotus 1-2-3
  • machine learning
  • machines
  • macOS
  • MB
  • memory
  • Microsoft Office
  • Microsoft Office 365
  • Microsoft Word 2.0
  • modems
  • Mosaic
  • MS-DOS 2.0
  • MS-DOS 3.0
  • multi-core processors
  • multitasking
  • natural language processing
  • Netscape Navigator
  • network
  • Nouns (101): days
  • operating systems
  • optimization
  • PCs
  • processor
  • programs
  • protocol
  • RAM
  • recommendation systems
  • screen
  • search engines
  • security.
  • Siri
  • social networks
  • software
  • spreadsheets
  • SSDs
  • streaming
  • student
  • tasks
  • TCP/IP
  • treatments
  • video
  • virtual assistants
  • Visual Studio Code
  • Wi-Fi
  • Windows
  • Windows 10
  • Windows 11
  • Windows 3.0
  • word processing
  • WordStar
  • World Wide Web
  • XT
  • Yahoo
Unknown's avatar

Published by Jose Galindo ( https://ellameencontrara.com/2023/07/01/acerca-de-mi-jose-carlos-galindo-hinostroza/ )

Amo a mi prójimo como a mi mismo, pero no todos son mi prójimo, mi prójimo son los justos, si todos fuesen el prójimo, nadie habría asesinado a los santos, ni nadie hubiese escondido sus palabras, ni nadie hubiese falsificado las palabras de los santos, ni yo tendría ninguna necesidad de hacer este juicio justo a favor de mi prójimo y en perjuicio de nuestros enemigos, pues nadie hubiese calumniado contra mi como lo hacen los enemigos de mi prójimo, es que no es lo mismo oveja que lobo, aunque la oveja este desorientada o descarriada por su ignorancia, oveja es y el pastor desea salvarla, en cambio el lobo, aunque se vista de oveja, lobo sigue siendo y no puede convertirse jamás en oveja, el buen pastor no solo apacienta a las ovejas, él tambien caza a los lobos, como lobos son los calumiadores, los lobos del imperio romano, que tienen por madre de los fundadores de Roma, no de casualidad, a una loba. Esos son los que han calumniado contra los santos, y ellos son los grandes perdedores en el juicio final, es que el juicio final no perjudica a todos ni beneficia a todos, por eso muchos conspiraron contra el juicio final pues saben por su asquerosa conciencia que lo que hacen es injusto. https://gabriels.work/2024/09/17/el-abogado-de-los-secuestradores-argumenta-con-argumentos-religiosos-no-exijan-lo-que-es-suyo-y-amen-a-sus-enemigos-lucas-1630-a-todo-el-que-te-pida-dale-y-al-que-tome-lo-que-es-tuyo-no-se-lo-r/ I love my neighbor as myself, but not everyone is my neighbor, my neighbor is the righteous, if everyone were my neighbor, no one would have murdered the saints, nor would anyone have hidden their words, nor would anyone have falsified the words of the saints, nor would I have any need to make this just judgment in favor of my neighbor and to the detriment of our enemies, because no one would have slandered me as my neighbor's enemies do, because sheep and wolf are not the same, although the sheep is disoriented or led astray by its ignorance, it is a sheep and the shepherd wants to save it, on the other hand the wolf, even if he dresses as a sheep, is still a wolf and can never become a sheep, the good shepherd not only feeds the sheep, he also hunts wolves, as wolves are the slanderers, the wolves of the Roman Empire, whose mother of the founders of Rome, not by chance, is a she-wolf. Those are the ones who have slandered the saints, and they are the great losers in the final judgment, it is that the final judgment does not harm everyone nor benefit everyone, that is why many conspired against the final judgment because they know through their disgusting conscience that what they do is unjust. https://ntiend.me/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/the-book-of-life-revelations-el-libro-de-la-vida-revelaciones.docx - https://itwillbedotme.files.wordpress.com/2023/09/death-penalty-in-justice-is-a-need-to-clean-the-world-from-the-curse.docx – https://itwillbedotme.files.wordpress.com/2023/09/this-is-satan-and-these-are-his-religions.docx View all posts by Jose Galindo ( https://ellameencontrara.com/2023/07/01/acerca-de-mi-jose-carlos-galindo-hinostroza/ )

Published 20 de August de 20242 de September de 2025

Post navigation

Previous Post Evolución Tecnológica: De las Computadoras XT a la Era de la Inteligencia Artificial
Next Post Vete Satanás porque yo sé quién eres y sé que quieres justificar a los injustos porque tú también eres injusto.

A slander seeks the suffering of innocent people. A slander is reflected in an incoherent message. On this website, I destroy the incoherent messages of the beasts of the Roman Empire, who created false religions after destroying the religion that had a message consistent with justice, one free of contradictions.

IDI02 The testimony is here - PDFDownload
IDI02 The testimony is hereDownload

Estadísticas del sitio

  • 13,933 visitas

Una calumnia busca sufrimiento de gente inocente. Una calumnia se ve reflejada en un mensaje incoherente, en esta página web destruyo los mensajes incoherentes de las bestias del imperio romano quienes crearon falsas religiones después de destruir la religión que tenía un mensaje coherente con la justicia, uno libre de contradicciones.

IDI01 Ya hecho el testimonio - PDFDescarga
IDI01 Ya hecho el testimonioDescarga

La bestia dice incoherencias, dice calumnias, pero el justo puede pensar con lucidez porque la justicia es luz, y la luz no es un hombre finito sino un ser infinito. Pero la bestia en sus calumnias dijo que el mensajero de la luz dijo de sí mismo ser esa luz, si me dejo entender por ti, entiéndeme mejor aún visitando además: https://ntiend.me - https://bestiadn.com - https://ellameencontrara.com - https://gabriels.work - https://144k.xyz - https://shewillfind.me - https://neveraging.one

Ten piedad de mi Yahvé mi DiosDescarga

  1. IDI01 Español – Creí que le estaban haciendo brujería, pero la bruja era ella. Estos son mis argumentos. (Archivo PDF)Descarga Archivo en formato Docx (Word)
  2. IDI02 Inglés – I thought someone was doing witchcraft on her, but the witch was her. These are my arguments. (PDF file)Download File in Docx (Word) format
  3. IDI03 Italiano – Credevo che fosse stregata, ma la strega era lei. Ecco i miei argomenti. (file PDF)Scarica il file in formato Docx (Word)
  4. IDI04 Francés – Je pensais qu'elle était ensorcelée, mais la sorcière c'était elle. Voici mes arguments. (fichier PDF)Télécharger le fichier au format Docx (Word)
  5. IDI05 Portugués – Eu pensei que ela estava sendo enfeitiçada, mas a bruxa era ela. Estes são meus argumentos. (arquivo PDF)Baixar arquivo no formato Docx (Word)
  6. IDI06 Alemán – Ich dachte, sie wurde verzaubert, aber die Hexe war sie. Hier sind meine Argumente. (PDF-Datei)Datei im Docx-Format (Word) herunterladen
  7. IDI07 Polaco – Myślałem, że została zaczarowana, ale to ona była wiedźmą. Oto moje argumenty. (plik PDF)Pobierz plik w formacie Docx (Word)
  8. IDI08 Ucraniano – Я думав, що її зачарували, але відьмою була вона. Ось мої аргументи. (PDF файл)Завантажити файл у форматі Docx (Word)
  9. IDI09 Ruso – Я думал, что её околдовали, но ведьмой была она. Вот мои аргументы. (PDF-файл)Скачать файл в формате Docx (Word)
  10. IDI10 Neerlandés – Ik dacht dat ze betoverd werd, maar de heks was zij. Dit zijn mijn argumenten. (PDF-bestand)Download bestand in Docx (Word)-formaat
  11. IDI44 Chino –我以为她被施了魔法,但女巫是她。这是我的论据。(PDF 文件)下载 Docx(Word)格式的文件
  12. IDI43 Japonés – 彼女が呪われていると思っていたが、魔女は彼女だった。これが私の論拠だ。 (PDF ファイル)Docx(Word)形式のファイルをダウンロード
  13. IDI30 Coreano – 나는 그녀가 마법에 걸렸다고 생각했지만 마녀는 그녀였다. 이것이 나의 주장이다. (PDF 파일)Docx (Word) 형식의 파일 다운로드
  14. IDI23 Árabe –كنت أعتقد أنها مسحورة لكن الساحرة كانت هي. هذه هي أدلتي. (ملف PDF)تحميل الملف بصيغة Docx (Word)
  15. IDI20 Turco – Onun büyülendiğini sanıyordum ama cadı oymuş. İşte benim kanıtlarım. (PDF dosyası)Docx (Word) formatında dosya indir
  16. IDI24 Persa – فکر می‌کردم او طلسم شده اما جادوگر خودش بود. اینها دلایل من هستند. (فایل PDF)دانلود فایل با فرمت Docx (Word)
  17. IDI14 Indonesio – Saya pikir dia sedang disihir tapi penyihirnya adalah dia. Ini adalah argumen saya. (file PDF)Unduh file dalam format Docx (Word)
  18. IDI26 Bengalí – আমি ভেবেছিলাম তাকে জাদু করা হয়েছে কিন্তু জাদুকরী সে-ই ছিল. এগুলি আমার যুক্তি। (পিডিএফ ফাইল)Docx (Word) ফরম্যাটে ফাইল ডাউনলোড করুন
  19. IDI22 Urdu – میں نے سوچا کہ اس پر جادو کیا جا رہا ہے لیکن جادوگرنی وہی تھی. یہ ہیں میرے دلائل۔ (پی ڈی ایف فائل)Docx (Word) فارمیٹ میں فائل ڈاؤن لوڈ کریں
  20. IDI31 Filipino – Akala ko ay siya ang ginagayuma pero ang bruha pala ay siya mismo. Ito ang aking mga argumento. (PDF file)I-download ang file sa format na Docx (Word)
  21. IDI32 Vietnamita – Tôi tưởng cô ấy bị yểm bùa nhưng phù thủy chính là cô ấy. Đây là những lập luận của tôi. (tệp PDF)Tải xuống tệp ở định dạng Docx (Word)
  22. IDI45 Hindi – मैंने सोचा कि उस पर जादू किया जा रहा है लेकिन असली जादूगरनी वही थी. ये रहे मेरे तर्क। (पीडीएफ फाइल)Docx (Word) फ़ॉर्मेट में फ़ाइल डाउनलोड करें
  23. IDI54 Suajili – Nilidhani alikuwa akirogwa lakini mchawi alikuwa yeye. Hizi ni hoja zangu. (faili ya PDF)Pakua faili katika muundo wa Docx (Word)
  24. IDI11 Rumano –Credeam că este vrăjită dar vrăjitoarea era ea. Acestea sunt argumentele mele. (fișier PDF)Descarcă fișierul în format Docx (Word)

Este es el trigo en la Biblia que destruye la cizaña romana en la Biblia: Apocalipsis 19:11 Vi el cielo abierto, y un caballo blanco, y el que lo montaba se llamaba Fiel y Verdadero, y con justicia juzga y hace la guerra. Apocalipsis 19:19 Vi a la bestia, a los reyes de la tierra y a sus ejércitos, reunidos para hacer guerra contra el que montaba el caballo, y contra su ejército. Salmos 2:2-4 dice: “Se levantaron los reyes de la tierra, y los gobernantes consultaron unidos contra el Señor y contra su ungido, diciendo: Rompamos sus ataduras, y echemos de nosotros sus cuerdas”. El que mora en los cielos se ríe; el Señor se burla de ellos”. Ahora, algo de lógica básica: si el jinete lucha por la justicia, pero la bestia y los reyes de la tierra luchan contra este jinete, entonces la bestia y los reyes de la tierra están en contra de la justicia, por lo tanto, representan el engaño de las religiones falsas que gobiernan con ellos. La ramera Babilonia, que es la iglesia falsa hecha por Roma, se ha considerado a sí misma como "la esposa del ungido del Señor", pero los falsos profetas de esta organización vendedora de ídolos y palabras aduladoras, no comparten las metas personales del ungido del Señor y de los verdaderos santos, porque los líderes impíos han escogido para sí mismos el camino de la idolatría, el celibato o el sacramentar matrimonios no sagrado a cambio de dinero. Su sedes religiosas están llenas de ídolos, incluyendo los falsos libros sagrados, delante de los cuales se arrodillan: Isaías 2:8 Además su tierra está llena de ídolos, y se han arrodillado ante la obra de sus manos y ante lo que fabricaron sus dedos. 9 Y se ha inclinado el hombre, y el varón se ha humillado; por tanto, no los perdones. 10 Métete en la peña, escóndete en el polvo, de la presencia temible de Jehová, y del resplandor de su majestad. 11 La altivez de los ojos del hombre será abatida, y la soberbia de los hombres será humillada; y Jehová solo será exaltado en aquel día. Proverbios 19:14 La casa y las riquezas son herencia de los padres, pero la mujer prudente es de Jehová. Levítico 21:14 El sacerdote de Jehová no se casará con viuda, ni repudiada, ni inmunda, ni ramera; tomará por mujer a una virgen de su pueblo. Apocalipsis 1:6 Y nos ha hecho reyes y sacerdotes para Dios, su Padre; a él sea la gloria y el imperio por los siglos. 1 Corintios 11:7 La mujer es gloria del varón. No soy fanático religioso, entre otras razones, porque no sigo ninguna religión conocida. Yo sigo la justicia. Mi pasión es la justicia. Soy el creador de blogs como lavirgenmecreera.com, y el nombre del dominio (La virgen me creerá) no tiene nada que ver con lo que creen algunos prejuiciosos. No soy católico ni me refiero a la mujer que ellos llaman «la virgen». Tampoco soy evangelista bíblico, porque no defiendo la Biblia. Por el contrario, mis mensajes son incompatibles con los pensamientos de los fanáticos religiosos. El típico fanático religioso es incapaz de admitir que hay mentiras en la Biblia, el Corán o la Torá. A pesar de las contradicciones evidentes, se niegan a aceptar que el Imperio Romano, al perseguir la verdadera religión, la destruyó completamente y nunca permitió su reconstrucción. Las actuales religiones que dicen adorar al Dios de Abraham no son más que remedos acomodados a los intereses de Roma. Por eso sus líderes se llevan tan bien y se abrazan fraternalmente en reuniones interreligiosas. Cualquiera que tenga un mínimo de lógica puede notar que algo no cuadra ahí. «No puede ser cierto que todos los caminos de esas religiones conduzcan a Dios.» Es simple razonamiento: si A dice «x = 1», B dice «x = 2» y C dice «x = 3», luego todos juntos afirman: «Todas nuestras creencias son correctas y complacen a un mismo Dios», ¿Qué se puede concluir? Salvo que seas un imbécil, es evidente que todas sus afirmaciones son falsas. Si una fuera correcta, su portavoz no se llevaría bien con los voceros de las otras dos ni estarían repartiéndose abrazos y besos. Pero entre estafadores siempre hay acuerdos para repartirse influencias, y muchos políticos, al jurar sus cargos con la mano sobre sus «libros sagrados», dejan claro a quién sirven realmente.

 This is the wheat in the Bible that destroys the Roman tares in the Bible: Revelation 19:11 Then I saw heaven opened, and a white horse; and the one sitting on it was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he judges and makes war. Revelation 19:19 Then I saw the beast and the kings of the earth and their armies gathered together to make war against him who sat on the horse and against his army. Psalm 2:2-4 says, “The kings of the earth set themselves up and their rulers took counsel together against the Lord and against his anointed, saying, ‘Let us break their bands asunder and cast away their cords from us. ’ He who sits in the heavens laughs; the Lord mocks them.” Now, some basic logic: if the horseman fights for justice, but the beast and the kings of the earth fight against this horseman, then the beast and the kings of the earth are against justice, therefore, they represent the deception of the false religions that rule with them. The whore Babylon, which is the false church made by Rome, has considered herself to be “the wife of the Lord’s anointed,” but the false prophets of this idol-selling and flattering word-peddling organization do not share the personal goals of the Lord’s anointed and the true saints, because the ungodly leaders have chosen for themselves the path of idolatry, celibacy, or sacramentalizing unholy marriages in exchange for money. Their religious headquarters are full of idols, including false holy books, before which they bow down: Isaiah 2:8 Moreover their land is full of idols, and they bow down to the work of their hands and to the work of their fingers. 9 The man has bowed down, and the man has humbled himself; therefore do not spare them. 10 Go into the rock, hide yourself in the dust, from the awesome presence of the LORD, and from the splendor of his majesty. 11 The haughtiness of man's eyes will be humbled, and the pride of men will be humbled; and the LORD alone will be exalted in that day. Proverbs 19:14 House and riches are an inheritance from fathers, but a prudent wife is from the LORD. Leviticus 21:14 The priest of the LORD shall not marry a widow, nor a divorced woman, nor an unclean woman, nor an harlot; he shall take a virgin of his own people to wife. Revelation 1:6 And he has made us kings and priests to his God and Father; to him be glory and dominion forever. 1 Corinthians 11:7 Woman is the glory of man. I am not a religious fanatic, among other reasons, because I do not follow any known religion. I follow justice. My passion is justice. I am the creator of blogs like lavirgenmecreera.com, and the domain name (La virgen me creerá) has nothing to do with what some prejudiced people believe. I am not Catholic nor do I refer to the woman they call "the virgin." I am not a biblical evangelist either, because I do not defend the Bible. On the contrary, my messages are incompatible with the thoughts of religious fanatics. The typical religious fanatic is incapable of admitting that there are lies in the Bible, the Koran or the Torah. Despite the obvious contradictions, they refuse to accept that the Roman Empire, by persecuting the true religion, completely destroyed it and never allowed its reconstruction. The current religions that claim to worship the God of Abraham are nothing more than imitations accommodated to the interests of Rome. That is why their leaders get along so well and embrace each other fraternally at interreligious meetings. Anyone with a modicum of logic can see that something doesn't add up here. "It can't be true that all the paths of these religions lead to God." It's simple reasoning: if A says "x = 1," B says "x = 2," and C says "x = 3," then all of them together claim: "All our beliefs are correct and please the same God," what can be concluded? Unless you're an idiot, it's obvious that all of their claims are false. If one were correct, its spokesperson wouldn't get along with the spokespersons of the other two, and they wouldn't be giving each other hugs and kisses. But there are always agreements between swindlers to share influence, and many politicians, by swearing their oaths of office with their hands on their "sacred books," make it clear who they really serve. 

El testimonio de Jose. █
Soy José Carlos Galindo Hinostroza, el autor del blog: https://ntiend.me,
https://ellameencontrara.com y otros blogs.
Nací en Perú, esa foto es mía, es de 1997, tenía 22 años, en ese tiempo estaba enredado en las intrigas de Sandra Elizabeth, una excompañera del instituto IDAT, estaba confundido sobre lo que le pasaba (Ella me acosó de una manera muy compleja y extensa para narrar en esta imagen, pero lo narro en la parte inferior de este blog: ovni03.blogspot.com y en este video: https://youtu.be/KpiStRMcxd8). No descarté la posibilidad de que Mónica Nieves, mi exnovia, le hubiera hecho alguna brujería.

Al buscar respuestas en la Biblia, leí en Mateo 5:
» Oren por quien los insulta,»
Y en esos días, Sandra me insultaba mientras me decía que no sabía qué le pasaba, que quería seguir siendo mi amiga y que debía seguir llamándola y buscándola una y otra vez, y así fue durante cinco meses. En resumen, Sandra fingió estar poseída por algo para mantenerme confundido. Las mentiras de la Biblia me hicieron creer que las personas buenas pueden comportarse mal por culpa de un espíritu maligno, por eso el consejo de orar por ella no me pareció tan absurdo, porque antes Sandra fingía ser amiga, y caí en su engaño.

Los ladrones suelen usar la estrategia de fingir buenas intenciones: Para robar en tiendas fingen ser clientes, para pedir diezmos fingen predicar la palabra de Dios, pero predican la de Roma, etc. etc. Sandra Elizabeth fingió ser amiga, luego fingió ser una amiga en problemas buscando mi ayuda, pero todo era para calumniarme y emboscarme con tres delincuentes, seguramente por despecho porque un año antes rechacé sus insinuaciones porque estaba enamorado de Mónica Nieves, a quien fui fiel. Pero Mónica no confiaba en mi fidelidad y amenazó con matar a Sandra Elizabeth, por lo que terminé con Mónica lentamente, en ocho meses, para que no creyera que era por Sandra. Pero así me pagó Sandra Elizabeth, con calumnias. Me acusó falsamente de acosarla sexualmente y, con ese pretexto, ordenó a tres delincuentes que me golpearan, todo esto frente a ella.

Narro todo esto en mi blog y en mis videos de Youtube:

No deseo que otros justos pasen por experiencias como la mía, por eso he creado lo que estás leyendo. Sé que esto irritará a los injustos como Sandra, pero la verdad es como el verdadero evangelio, y solo favorece a los justos.

Ten piedad de mi Yahvé mi Dios - Y dame tu bendición

La historia detrás de los blogs de José Galindo. █

José, un joven criado en enseñanzas católicas, vivió una serie de acontecimientos marcados por relaciones complejas y manipulaciones. A los 19 años inició una relación con Mónica, una mujer posesiva y celosa. Aunque José sentía que debía terminar la relación, su formación religiosa lo llevó a intentar cambiarla con amor. Sin embargo, los celos de Mónica se intensificaron, especialmente hacia Sandra, una compañera de clase que le hacía insinuaciones a José.

Sandra comenzó a acosarlo en 1995 con llamadas telefónicas anónimas, en las que hacía ruidos con el teclado y colgaba.

En una de esas ocasiones, reveló que era ella quien llamaba, luego de que José le preguntara enojado en la última llamada: «¿Quién eres tú?». Sandra lo llamó de inmediato, pero en esa llamada le dijo: «José, ¿Quién soy yo?». José, al reconocer su voz, le dijo: «Tú eres Sandra», a lo que ella respondió: «Ya sabes quién soy yo». José evitó confrontarla. Durante esa época, Mónica, obsesionada con Sandra, amenazó a José con hacerle daño Sandra, lo que llevó a José a proteger a Sandra y prolongar su relación con Mónica, a pesar de su deseo de terminarla.

Finalmente, en 1996, José rompió con Mónica y decidió acercarse a Sandra, quien inicialmente había mostrado interés en él. Cuando José intentó hablar con ella sobre sus sentimientos, Sandra no le permitió explicarse, lo trató con palabras ofensivas y él no entendió la razón. José optó por distanciarse, pero en 1997 creyó tener la oportunidad de hablar con Sandra, esperando que ella le explicara su cambio de actitud y pudiera compartir los sentimientos que había mantenido callados. En su cumpleaños en julio, la llamó como lo había prometido un año antes, cuando aún eran amigos, algo que no pudo hacer en 1996 porque estaba con Mónica. En aquel entonces, solía creer que las promesas nunca debían romperse (Mateo 5:34-37), aunque ahora entiende que algunas promesas y juramentos pueden reconsiderarse si se hicieron por error o si la persona ya no los merece. Cuando terminó de saludarla y estaba a punto de colgar, Sandra suplicó desesperadamente: "Espera, espera, ¿podemos vernos?" Eso le hizo pensar que ella había recapacitado y que finalmente le explicaría su cambio de actitud, permitiéndole compartir los sentimientos que había guardado en silencio. Sin embargo, Sandra nunca le dio respuestas claras, manteniendo la intriga con actitudes evasivas y contraproducentes.

José le pidió a su tía, la dueña de la línea telefónica, que solicitara a la compañía de teléfonos el registro de las llamadas entrantes. Él pensaba utilizar esa información como prueba para contactar a la familia de Sandra y manifestarle su preocupación por lo que ella pretendía conseguir con esa conducta. Sin embargo, su tía restó importancia a su argumento y se negó a ayudarlo. Curiosamente, nadie en la casa, ni su tía ni su abuela paterna, parecían indignarse por el hecho de que las llamadas se produjeran además en la madrugada, y no se molestaron en buscar cómo detenerlas ni identificar al responsable.

Esto tenía la extraña apariencia de una tortura orquestada. Incluso cuando José le pidió a su tía que desconectara el cable del teléfono por la noche para poder dormir, ella se negó, argumentando que uno de sus hijos, que vivía en Italia, podría llamar en cualquier momento (considerando la diferencia horaria de seis horas entre ambos países). Lo que hacía todo aún más extraño era la fijación de Mónica con Sandra, a pesar de que ni siquiera se conocían. Mónica no estudiaba en el instituto donde estaban matriculados José y Sandra, pero empezó a sentir celos de Sandra desde que encontró una carpeta con un proyecto grupal de José. La carpeta enumeraba los nombres de dos mujeres, incluida Sandra, pero por alguna extraña razón, Mónica se obsesionó solo con el nombre de Sandra.

Aunque José inicialmente ignoró las llamadas telefónicas de Sandra, con el tiempo cedió y volvió a contactar a Sandra, influenciado por las enseñanzas bíblicas que aconsejaban orar por quienes lo perseguían. Sin embargo, Sandra lo manipulaba emocionalmente, alternando entre insultos y peticiones para que él siguiera buscándola. Después de meses de este ciclo, José descubrió que todo era una trampa. Sandra lo acusó falsamente de acoso sexual, y como si eso no fuera suficientemente malo, Sandra envió a unos criminales a que golpearan a José.

Ese martes, sin que José lo supiera, Sandra ya le había tendido una trampa.

Unos días antes, José le había contado a su amigo Johan la situación que estaba viviendo con Sandra. Johan también encontró extraño su comportamiento y pensó que podría deberse a algún tipo de brujería por parte de Mónica. Ese martes, José había ido a visitar su antiguo barrio, donde había vivido en 1995, y se encontró por casualidad con Johan. Después de escuchar más detalles, Johan le aconsejó que se olvidara de Sandra y saliera a bailar a conocer a otras mujeres; tal vez encontraría a alguien que lo ayudara a olvidarla. A José le gustó la idea.

Entonces tomaron un autobús al centro de Lima para ir a una discoteca. Por coincidencia la ruta pasaba por el instituto IDAT. Como estaban a una cuadra del IDAT, a José de repente se le ocurrió bajar un momento a pagar una clase de sábado a la que se había apuntado. Pudo ahorrar algo de dinero vendiendo su computadora y trabajando durante una semana en un almacén. Sin embargo, tuvo que renunciar porque explotaban a los empleados obligándolos a trabajar 16 horas diarias mientras que solo declaraban 12, y si se negaban a terminar la semana, los amenazaban con no pagarles nada.

José se volvió hacia Johan y le dijo: “Estudio aquí los sábados. Ya que estamos de paso, bajemos un momento, pago mi clase y luego seguimos camino a la discoteca”.

Tan pronto como José pisó la acera, antes incluso de cruzar la calle, se quedó atónito al ver a Sandra allí, parada en la esquina del instituto. Incrédulo, le dijo a Johan: “Johan, no lo puedo creer, Sandra está aquí. Es la chica de la que te hablé, la que ha estado actuando tan extraño. Espérame aquí, le preguntaré si recibió la carta donde le advertí sobre las amenazas de Mónica en su contra, y tal vez finalmente pueda explicarme qué le pasa y qué quiere de mí con todas estas llamadas”.

Johan esperó mientras José se acercaba. Pero apenas había empezado a hablar: «Sandra, ¿has visto mis cartas? ¿Puedes explicarme finalmente qué te pasa?» Cuando Sandra, sin decir palabra, hizo un gesto con la mano. Fue una señal. Entonces aparecieron tres matones, escondidos en diferentes lugares: uno en medio de la calle, otro detrás de Sandra y el tercero detrás de José.

El que estaba detrás de Sandra se acercó y le dijo: “Entonces, ¿eres tú el acosador sexual que molesta a mi prima?”

José, desconcertado, respondió: “¿Qué? ¿Yo, un acosador? Al contrario, ¡es ella quien me acosa! Si lees la carta, verás que sólo intento entender por qué me sigue llamando”.

Antes de que pudiera reaccionar, uno de los matones lo agarró por el cuello por detrás y lo arrojó violentamente al suelo. Luego, junto con el que decía ser primo de Sandra, comenzaron a patearlo. Mientras tanto, el tercer matón lo registraba, intentando robarle. Eran tres contra uno y José yacía indefenso en el suelo.

Afortunadamente, su amigo Johan intervino en la pelea, permitiendo que José volviera a levantarse. Pero el tercer atacante tomó piedras y las arrojó contra José y Johan.

El ataque sólo se detuvo cuando intervino un policía de tránsito. El policía se volvió hacia Sandra y le dijo: "Si te está acosando, entonces presenta una denuncia".

Sandra, visiblemente nerviosa, se alejó rápidamente, sabiendo muy bien que su acusación era falsa.

José, aunque profundamente traicionado, no presentó denuncia. No tenía pruebas de los meses de acoso que había sufrido por parte de Sandra. Pero más allá del shock de la traición, una pregunta lo perseguía:

"¿Cómo pudo haber planeado esta emboscada, si yo nunca vengo aquí los martes por la noche? Sólo vengo los sábados por la mañana para mis clases".

Esto generó en él una duda aterradora: ¿y si Sandra no era sólo una mujer, sino una bruja con poderes sobrenaturales?

Estos hechos dejaron una profunda huella en José, quien busca justicia y desenmascarar a quienes lo manipularon. Además, busca desbaratar los consejos de la Biblia, como “oren por quienes los insultan”, porque al seguir ese consejo, cayó en la trampa de Sandra.

La maldad de la familia de José eclipsa la maldad de Sandra.

José sufrió una traición devastadora por parte de su propia familia, que no solo se negó a ayudarlo a detener el acoso de Sandra, sino que además lo acusó falsamente de tener una enfermedad mental. Sus propios familiares usaron estas acusaciones como pretexto para secuestrarlo y torturarlo, enviándolo en dos ocasiones a centros para enfermos mentales y una tercera vez a un hospital.
Todo comenzó cuando José leyó Éxodo 20:5 y dejó de ser católico. Desde ese momento, se indignó con los dogmas de la Iglesia y comenzó a protestar por su cuenta contra sus doctrinas, además de aconsejar a sus familiares que dejaran de rezar a imágenes. También les comentó que estaba rezando por una amiga (Sandra), quien aparentemente estaba embrujada o poseída. José estaba bajo estrés debido al acoso, pero sus familiares no toleraron que ejerciera su libertad de expresión religiosa. Como resultado, destruyeron su vida laboral, su salud y su reputación, encerrándolo en centros para enfermos mentales donde le administraron sedantes.
No solo lo internaron en contra de su voluntad, sino que, después de su liberación, lo obligaron a seguir tomando medicamentos psiquiátricos bajo amenazas de nuevos encierros. Luchó por liberarse de esas ataduras, y durante los últimos dos años de esa injusticia, con su carrera profesional como programador destruida, se vio obligado a trabajar sin salario en el restaurante de un tío que traicionó su confianza. José descubrió en 2007 que este tío le hacía poner pastillas psiquiátricas en su almuerzo sin su conocimiento. Fue gracias a la ayuda de una empleada de cocina, Lidia, que logró descubrir la verdad.
Desde 1998 hasta 2007, José perdió prácticamente diez años de su juventud por culpa de familiares traidores. En retrospectiva, se dio cuenta de que su error fue defender la Biblia para negar el catolicismo, ya que sus familiares nunca le permitieron leerla. Ellos cometieron esta injusticia porque sabían que él no tenía recursos económicos para defenderse. Cuando finalmente logró liberarse de la medicación forzada, creyó que había conseguido el respeto de sus parientes. Sus tíos y primos maternos incluso le ofrecieron empleo, pero años después lo traicionaron nuevamente con un trato hostil que lo obligó a renunciar. Esto le hizo pensar que nunca debió haberlos perdonado, ya que sus malas intenciones quedaron en evidencia.
A partir de ese momento, decidió volver a estudiar la Biblia, y en 2017 comenzó a notar sus contradicciones. Poco a poco entendió por qué Dios había permitido que sus familiares le impidieran defenderla en su juventud. Descubrió las inconsistencias bíblicas y comenzó a denunciarlas en sus blogs, donde también relató la historia de su fe y el sufrimiento que padeció a manos de Sandra y, sobre todo, de sus propios familiares.
Por este motivo, su madre intentó secuestrarlo nuevamente en diciembre de 2018 con la ayuda de malos policías y un psiquiatra que emitió un certificado falso. Lo acusaron de ser un «peligroso esquizofrénico» para encerrarlo de nuevo, pero el intento fracasó porque él no estaba en casa. Hubo testigos del hecho y audios que José presentó como pruebas ante las autoridades peruanas en su denuncia, la cual fue rechazada.
Su familia sabía perfectamente que él no estaba loco: tenía un trabajo estable, un hijo y a la madre de su hijo a quien cuidar. Sin embargo, aun conociendo la verdad, intentaron secuestrarlo con la misma calumnia de antaño. Su propia madre y otros familiares fanáticos católicos lideraron el intento. Aunque su denuncia fue ignorada por el Ministerio, José expone estas pruebas en sus blogs, dejando en claro que la maldad de su familia eclipsa incluso la de Sandra.

Prova (Evidencias)Descarga

IDI01 JOSE GALINDO VIDA Y MENSAJE (PDF)Descarga

IDI01 JOSE GALINDO VIDA Y MENSAJE (WORD)Descarga

Puedes encontrar más información en:

Haz clic para acceder a que-pase-la-desgraciada-a-juicio-las-calumnias-de-sandra-contra-jose.pdf

Haz clic para acceder a sandra-sandratanas-satanas.pdf

Y en estos videos:

No uso Tiktok pero puedes suscribirte a mis canales de Youtube.

La religión que yo defiendo se llama justicia.

¿Qué significa en Apocalipsis que la bestia y los reyes de la tierra hacen la guerra al jinete del caballo blanco y su ejército?

El significado es claro, los líderes mundiales están mano a mano con los falsos profetas que son diseminadores de las religiones falsas que dominan entre los reinos de la tierra, por razones obvias, eso incluye el cristianismo, el Islam, etc. Estos gobernantes están en contra de la justicia. y la verdad, cuáles son los valores que defiende el jinete del caballo blanco y su ejército leal a Dios. Como es evidente, el engaño es parte de los falsos libros sagrados que estos cómplices defienden con la etiqueta “Libros Autorizados de las Religiones Autorizadas”, pero la única religión que defiendo es la justicia, defiendo el derecho de los justos a no ser engañados con engaños religiosos.

Apocalipsis 19:19 Entonces vi la bestia y los reyes de la tierra y sus ejércitos reunidos para hacer guerra contra el jinete del caballo y contra su ejército.

Apocalipsis 19:11 Entonces vi el cielo abierto, y he aquí un caballo blanco. El que estaba sentado en él se llamaba Fiel y Verdadero, y con justicia juzga y hace la guerra.

Ahora una lógica básica, si el jinete defiende la justicia, pero la bestia y los reyes de la tierra luchan contra este jinete, entonces la bestia y los reyes de la tierra están en contra de la justicia, por lo tanto defienden el engaño de las religiones falsas que gobiernan con ellos.

Aquí está la evidencia de los secuestros utilizando la calumnia de traidores: “Este hombre es un esquizofrénico que necesita urgentemente tratamiento psiquiátrico y pastillas de por vida”.Descarga

Ella me encontrará, la mujer virgen me creerá.
( https://ellameencontrara.com – https://lavirgenmecreera.com – https://shewillfind.me )

Este es el trigo en la Biblia que destruye la cizaña romana en la Biblia:

Apocalipsis 19:11
Entonces vi el cielo abierto, y había un caballo blanco; y el que lo montaba se llamaba Fiel y Verdadero, y con justicia juzga y hace la guerra.

Apocalipsis 19:19
Y vi a la bestia, y a los reyes de la tierra, y a sus ejércitos reunidos para hacer guerra contra el que estaba sentado en el caballo y contra su ejército.

Salmos 2:2-4
"Los reyes de la tierra se levantan, y los gobernantes consultan unidos contra el Señor y contra su ungido, diciendo:
'Rompamos sus ataduras y echemos de nosotros sus cuerdas.'
El que mora en los cielos se reirá; el Señor se burlará de ellos."

Ahora, un poco de lógica básica: si el jinete lucha por la justicia, pero la bestia y los reyes de la tierra luchan contra este jinete, entonces la bestia y los reyes de la tierra están en contra de la justicia. Por lo tanto, representan el engaño de las falsas religiones que gobiernan con ellos.

La gran ramera de Babilonia, que es la iglesia falsa creada por Roma, se ha considerado a sí misma "la esposa del ungido del Señor", pero los falsos profetas de esta organización que vende ídolos y palabras aduladoras no comparten los objetivos personales del ungido del Señor y de los verdaderos santos, porque los líderes impíos han elegido para sí mismos el camino de la idolatría, el celibato o la sacramentalización de matrimonios impíos a cambio de dinero. Sus sedes religiosas están llenas de ídolos, incluyendo falsos libros sagrados, ante los cuales se inclinan:

Isaías 2:8-11
8 Su tierra está llena de ídolos; se postran ante la obra de sus manos, ante lo que hicieron sus dedos.
9 El hombre se ha inclinado, y el hombre se ha humillado; por tanto, no los perdones.
10 Métete en la peña, escóndete en el polvo, ante la temible presencia del SEÑOR y la gloria de su majestad.
11 La altivez de los ojos del hombre será abatida, y la soberbia de los hombres será humillada; solo el SEÑOR será exaltado en aquel día.

Levítico 21:14
El sacerdote del SEÑOR no tomará por esposa a una viuda, ni a una divorciada, ni a una mujer impura, ni a una ramera; tomará por esposa a una virgen de su propio pueblo.

Apocalipsis 1:6
Y nos hizo reyes y sacerdotes para su Dios y Padre; a él sea la gloria y el dominio por los siglos de los siglos.

1 Corintios 11:7
La mujer es la gloria del hombre.

Roma creo las religiones del cuarto reino (las religiones de la cuarta bestia – las que el mundo conoce como – cristianismo – judaismo e islam )Descarga

¿Un demonio quiso hacer caer a Jesús de la nube en que Jesús flotaba? █
Citar este pasaje de la Biblia no es defender la Biblia porque la Biblia, aunque tiene verdades, también contiene mentiras de los romanos, esto te lo plantearon diferente en la Biblia (Hechos 1:6-1), esa es una muestra del engaño: Apocalipsis 12:7 La guerra en el cielo por la paz de los que moran en el cielo (En la otra vida, Dios está con los justos para darle la victoria al cielo: Oseas 6:1-3, Daniel 12:1-3, Salmos 118:7).
Mira tú mismo la inconsistencia:
Hechos 1:6 Entonces los que se habían reunido le preguntaron, diciendo: Señor, ¿restaurarás el reino a Israel en este tiempo? 7 Y les dijo: No os toca a vosotros saber los tiempos o las sazones, que el Padre puso en su sola potestad; 8 pero recibiréis poder, cuando haya venido sobre vosotros el Espíritu Santo, y me seréis testigos en Jerusalén, en toda Judea, en Samaria, y hasta lo último de la tierra. 9 Y habiendo dicho estas cosas, viéndolo ellos, fue alzado, y le recibió una nube que le ocultó de sus ojos. 10 Y estando ellos con los ojos puestos en el cielo, entre tanto que él se iba, he aquí se pusieron junto a ellos dos varones con vestiduras blancas, 11 los cuales también les dijeron: Varones galileos, ¿por qué estáis mirando al cielo? Este mismo Jesús, que ha sido tomado de vosotros al cielo, así vendrá como le habéis visto ir al cielo.
Compara esa supuesta forma de regresar de Jesús con esta forma de su regreso.
Mateo 21:38 Mas los labradores, cuando vieron al hijo, dijeron entre sí: Este es el heredero; venid, matémosle, y apoderémonos de su heredad. 39 Y tomándole, le echaron fuera de la viña, y le mataron. 40 Cuando venga, pues, el señor de la viña, ¿qué hará a aquellos labradores? 41 Le dijeron: A los malos destruirá sin misericordia, y arrendará su viña a otros labradores, que le paguen el fruto a su tiempo. 42 Jesús les dijo: ¿Nunca leísteis en las Escrituras: La piedra que desecharon los edificadores, ha venido a ser cabeza del ángulo. El Señor ha hecho esto, Y es cosa maravillosa a nuestros ojos?
Observa como esa profecía a la que se hace referencia habla de circunstancias incompatibles con la forma del regreso de Jesús según Hechos 1:6-11, lo que no te dijeron otros, yo sí lo hago, por eso mi proyecto es muy singular, quizás es único en el mundo, y espero no ser el único, en todo caso mis conclusiones no tienen “derecho de autor” que las compartan y traduzcan los que quieran y puedan:
Salmos 118:10 Todas las naciones me rodearon; Mas en el nombre de Jehová yo las destruiré.
¿Significa esto que Jesús ni amó a sus enemigos ni predicó que damos hacerlo?
Salmos 118:13 Me empujaste con violencia para que cayese, Pero me ayudó Jehová.
¿Un demonio quiso hacer caer a Jesús de la nube en que Jesús flotaba?
Salmos 118:14 Mi fortaleza y mi cántico es Jehová, Y él me ha sido por salvación.
¿No es esto prueba de que Jesús nunca se predicó a sí mismo como el salvador digno de ser adorado, en contraposición el mensaje en Hebreos 1:6?
Salmos 118:15 Voz de júbilo y de salvación hay en las tiendas de los justos; La diestra de Jehová hace proezas.
¿No significa esto que el verdadero evangelio significó únicamente buenas noticias para los justos? ¿No hecha esto por tierra la doctrina del amor universal de Dios?
Salmos 118:16 La diestra de Jehová es sublime; La diestra de Jehová hace valentías.
17 No moriré, sino que viviré, Y contaré las obras de Yahvé. 18 Me castigó gravemente Yahvé, Mas no me entregó a la muerte.
Si Dios castiga al hombre que es justo, ¿no lo hace Dios porque el hombre justo ha pecado y Dios desea corregirlo?, Si Jesús resucitó, y subió al cielo y vendrá igual y tiene vida eterna y recuerdos intactos, no puede ser posible que él cometa pecado porque ya conoce la verdad.
Salmos 118:19 Abridme las puertas de la justicia; Entraré por ellas, alabaré a Yahvé. 20 Esta es puerta de Jehová; Por ella entrarán los justos.
21 Te alabaré porque me has oído, Y me fuiste por salvación. 22 La piedra que desecharon los edificadores Ha venido a ser cabeza del ángulo.
Jesús nunca resucitó, los romanos nos han engañado. Ellos inventaron que Jesús resucitó para qué esta profecía se cumpla:
Oseas 6:1-3 Nos dará vida después de dos días; en el tercer día nos resucitará, y viviremos delante de él.
Pero si miras la profecía completa y aceptas que no habla de una persona sino de varias personas, te darán cuentas que esa profecía nunca hizo referencia a una supuesta resurrección de Jesús al tercer día, pues recuerda una cosa, Jesús no fue el único hombre justo que murió con la esperanza de volver a la vida, y ese regreso a la vida nunca hizo referencia a volver a la vida en el mismo cuerpo que perdió la vida, y eso solo nos deja una posibilidad: ¡La reencarnación!
Oseas 6:1 Venid y volvamos a Jehová; porque él arrebató, y nos curará; hirió, y nos vendará. 2 Nos dará vida después de dos días; en el tercer día nos resucitará, y viviremos delante de él. 3 Y conoceremos, y proseguiremos en conocer a Jehová; como el alba está dispuesta su salida, y vendrá a nosotros como la lluvia, como la lluvia tardía y temprana a la tierra.
¿Cuándo se daría esa reencarnación?
En el tercer día, que en realidad significa: En el tercer milenio, pues ese profeta en otro mensaje lo dejo a entrever:
Salmos 90:4 Porque mil años delante de tus ojos son como el día de ayer, que pasó, Y como una de las vigilias de la noche.
En ese tercer milenio los justos vuelven a la vida, pero en ese tiempo no queda nada de la religión que ellos tuvieron pues esta fue destruida por los romanos, entonces ellos pecan hasta que conocen la verdad y son limpios de sus pecados, los justos, a diferencia de los malvados, sí se pueden apartar del pecado cuando lo identifican, un pecado es una acción contra la justicia, defender un falso mensaje de Dios es un pecado, si cometieron ese pecado ellos dejan de hacerlo, pero los falsos profetas insisten en defender mentiras:
Daniel 12:2 Y muchos de los que duermen en el polvo de la tierra serán despertados, unos para vida eterna, y otros para vergüenza y confusión perpetua. Daniel 12:10 Muchos serán limpios, y emblanquecidos y purificados; los impíos procederán impíamente, y ninguno de los impíos entenderá, pero los entendidos comprenderán.
Dicen que cuando los justos mueren ellos se van al cielo.
Por ejemplo: ¿Dónde están el profeta Daniel, Lot, Noé y Jesús?, ellos están en “la otra vida”, ellos moran “en el cielo”, ellos están con Dios, y Dios está con ellos. Aunque en “el cielo” hay turbación porque las fuerzas satánicas aún en la otra vida combaten contra los santos, observa:
Apocalipsis 12:7 Después hubo una gran batalla en el cielo: Miguel y sus ángeles luchaban contra el dragón; y luchaban el dragón y sus ángeles.
La angustia en el cielo:
Salmos 118:4 Digan ahora los que temen a Jehová, que para siempre es su misericordia.
5 Desde la angustia invoqué a Yahvé, Y Yahvé me respondió, poniéndome en lugar espacioso.
A los justos los rodean miles de personas que no son justas, pero llega un momento en el que ese lugar se ve espacioso y ya no tugurizado de personas:
Salmos 91:7 Caerán a tu lado mil, y diez mil a tu diestra; Pero tú permanecerás firme.
8 Ciertamente con tus ojos mirarás y verás el castigo que recibirán los impíos.
Salmos 118:6 Jehová está conmigo; no temeré lo que me pueda hacer el hombre.
7 Jehová está conmigo entre los que me ayudan; Por tanto, yo veré mi deseo en los que me aborrecen.
Observa pues como Dios está con los justos y los justos están con Dios. Eso significa estar en el cielo.
Es error suponer que lo que está en la Biblia y de la que se dice: “Esto es después de Cristo”, es lo único proclive a tener fraudes o malas traducciones de los romanos. Para hacer más complejo el proceso de detección del fraude, los romanos también han falsificado mensajes que luego han atribuido a los profetas y a Moisés. Incluso los evangelios apócrifos contienen falsos textos ocultos pues son tan falsos como algunos que están en la Biblia.
A esto me refiero, mira la contradicción, si Dios realmente quisiera que los impíos no mueran, no los hubiese creado impíos sino justos, los impíos no pueden jamás dejar de ser injustos. Observa además como aquí se llama impía a Israel.
Ezequiel 3:11 Diles: Vivo yo, dice Jehová el Señor, que no quiero la muerte del impío, sino que se vuelva el impío de su camino, y que viva. Volveos, volveos de vuestros malos caminos; ¿por qué moriréis, oh casa de Israel?
Pero aquí se deduce que el verdadero Israel son los justos:
Salmos 118:1 Alabad a Jehová, porque él es bueno; Porque para siempre es su misericordia. 2 Diga ahora Israel, Que para siempre es su misericordia. 20 Esta es puerta de Jehová; Por ella entrarán los justos.
Lo que se puede afirmar es que todos pueden pecar, tanto los malos como los justos, pero que únicamente los justos pueden dejar de pecar.
Miguel, Gabriel y los demás santos ángeles son los benditos que vienen en el nombre de Yahvé en el tercer día (en el tercer milenio):
Salmos 118:24 Este es el día que hizo Jehová; Nos gozaremos y alegraremos en él. 26 Bendito el que viene en el nombre de Jehová; Desde la casa de Jehová os bendecimos.

Cuando llegaron los dos ángeles en día de la salvación de Lot, se alegró Lot, pero los sodomitas se irritaron.
Algo parecido sucede en los días del 7mo ángel y de sus aliados: En el tiempo en que se levantan Miguel, Gabriel, Uriel, etc. https://antibestia.com/2024/12/14/el-cielo-es-la-otra-vida-de-ellos-miguel-y-sus-angeles-no-es-una-referencia-a-energias-intocables-se-trata-de-hombres-justos-de-personas-de-carne-y-hueso-que-juzga-que-usa-palabras-para-ju/
Los romanos predicaron a un falso dios, a Zeus, y nunca a Yahvé, el Dios de Jesús.
Yo perseguiré, con el ejército de los varones que me entiendan y se sumen a esta causa, a Zeus y a los otros dioses rebeldes.

“¿Por qué huyes?, ¿No sabes que la mentira está dentro de la verdad y la verdad dice que la mentira es mentira y la verdad es verdad?, no tienes escapatoria, calumniador. “

«No lo entenderías». Esto no se los explicaría ni a los mormones, ni a «los testigos de Jehová», ni a los seminaristas ni sacerdotes católicos, porque ellos ya han leído y no han entendido. ¿Dónde están el profeta Daniel, Lot, Noé y Jesús?, ellos están en “la otra vida”, ellos moran “en el cielo”, ellos están con Dios, y Dios está con ellos. Aunque en “el cielo” hay turbación porque las fuerzas satánicas aún en la otra vida combaten contra los santos, observa aquí.

“Ahora lo ves»

She will find me

中文

Acerca de José Carlos Galindo Hinostroza (Perú)

Español English Italian

Français Português Deutsch

List

Polski Українська

Русский Nederlands বাংলা

عربي

SETON LR HOME

LIST

VIDEOS

ABOUT JOSÉ CARLOS GALINDO HINOSTROZA

El reino de la lógica no valida mensajes contradictorios, por eso los calumniadores no prosperan en nuestro reino.█
The realm of logic does not validate contradictory messages, that is why slanderers do not prosper in our realm.█
Il regno della logica non convalida messaggi contraddittori, ecco perché i calunniatori non prosperano nel nostro regno.█
Le royaume de la logique ne valide pas les messages contradictoires, c'est pourquoi les calomniateurs ne prospèrent pas dans notre royaume.█
O reino da lógica não valida mensagens contraditórias, por isso os caluniadores não prosperam em nosso reino.█
Das Reich der Logik bestätigt keine widersprüchlichen Botschaften, deshalb gedeihen Verleumder in unserem Reich nicht.█
Królestwo logiki nie zatwierdza sprzecznych komunikatów, dlatego oszczercy nie prosperują w naszym królestwie.█
Царство логіки не підтверджує суперечливі повідомлення, тому наклепники не процвітають у нашому царстві.█
Царство логики не подтверждает противоречивые сообщения, поэтому клеветники не процветают в нашем царстве.█
Het rijk van de logica valideert geen tegenstrijdige berichten, daarom gedijen lasteraars niet in ons rijk.█
逻辑领域不验证自相矛盾的信息,这就是为什么诽谤者在我们的领域无法繁荣。█
論理の領域は矛盾したメッセージを認めない、だからこそ中傷者は我々の領域で繁栄しない。█
논리의 영역은 모순된 메시지를 인정하지 않으며, 그렇기 때문에 비방하는 자들은 우리 영역에서 번창하지 못한다.█
مجال المنطق لا يصادق على الرسائل المتناقضة، ولهذا لا يزدهر المفترون في مملكتنا.█
Mantık âlemi çelişkili mesajları doğrulamaz, bu yüzden iftiracılar bizim âlemimizde başarılı olamazlar.█
قلمرو منطق پیام‌های متناقض را تأیید نمی‌کند، به همین دلیل افترازنندگان در قلمرو ما پیشرفت نمی‌کنند.█
Ranah logika tidak memvalidasi pesan yang kontradiktif, itulah sebabnya para pemfitnah tidak berkembang di ranah kami.█
যুক্তির জগৎ পরস্পরবিরোধী বার্তাগুলিকে বৈধতা দেয় না, তাই আমাদের জগতে অপবাদকারীরা উন্নতি করতে পারে না।█
منطق کا دائرہ متضاد پیغامات کی توثیق نہیں کرتا، اسی لیے بہتان تراش ہمارے دائرے میں ترقی نہیں کرتے۔█
Ang kaharian ng lohika ay hindi nagpapatunay ng magkakasalungat na mensahe, kaya't ang mga mapanirang-puri ay hindi umuunlad sa aming kaharian.█
Vương quốc logic không xác nhận những thông điệp mâu thuẫn, đó là lý do tại sao những kẻ vu khống không thể phát triển trong vương quốc của chúng ta.█
तर्क का क्षेत्र परस्पर विरोधी संदेशों को मान्यता नहीं देता, इसलिए हमारे क्षेत्र में निंदक सफल नहीं होते।█
Ulimwengu wa mantiki hauhalalishi ujumbe unaopingana, ndiyo maana wachongezi hawafanikiwi katika ulimwengu wetu.█
Tărâmul logicii nu validează mesaje contradictorii, de aceea calomniatorii nu prosperă în tărâmul nostru.█

La justicia me inspira a seguirla, dondequiera que vaya la seguiré.█
Justice inspires me to follow her, wherever she goes I will follow her.█
La giustizia mi ispira a seguirla, ovunque vada la seguirò.█
La justice m'inspire à la suivre, où qu'elle aille je la suivrai.█
A justiça me inspira a segui-la, onde quer que ela vá eu a seguirei.█
Die Gerechtigkeit inspiriert mich, ihr zu folgen, wohin sie auch geht, werde ich ihr folgen.█
Sprawiedliwość inspiruje mnie do podążania za nią, dokądkolwiek pójdzie, pójdę za nią.█
Справедливість надихає мене слідувати за нею, куди б вона не пішла, я піду за нею.█
Справедливость вдохновляет меня следовать за ней, куда бы она ни пошла, я пойду за ней.█
Gerechtigheid inspireert mij om haar te volgen, waar ze ook gaat zal ik haar volgen.█
正义激励我跟随她,无论她去哪里,我都会跟随她。█
正義は私に彼女を追うように促し、彼女がどこへ行こうとも私はついて行く。█
정의는 나에게 그녀를 따르도록 영감을 주며, 그녀가 어디를 가든 나는 따라갈 것이다.█
العدالة تلهمني أن أتبعها، أينما ذهبت سأتبعها.█
Adalet, onu takip etmem için bana ilham veriyor, nereye giderse gideyim onu takip edeceğim.█
عدالت مرا به پیروی از او الهام می‌دهد، هر جا که برود او را دنبال خواهم کرد.█
Keadilan menginspirasi saya untuk mengikutinya, ke mana pun dia pergi saya akan mengikutinya.█
ন্যায়বিচার আমাকে তাকে অনুসরণ করতে অনুপ্রাণিত করে, সে যেখানেই যাক আমি তাকে অনুসরণ করব।█
انصاف مجھے اس کی پیروی کرنے کی ترغیب دیتی ہے، جہاں بھی وہ جائے گی میں اس کے پیچھے جاؤں گا۔█
Ang katarungan ay nagbibigay-inspirasyon sa akin na sundan siya, saan man siya magpunta ay susundan ko siya.█
Công lý truyền cảm hứng cho tôi để theo cô ấy, dù cô ấy đi đâu tôi cũng sẽ theo.█
न्याय मुझे उसे अनुसरण करने के लिए प्रेरित करता है, वह जहाँ भी जाएगी मैं उसका अनुसरण करूंगा।█
Haki inanihamasisha kumfuata, popote aendapo nitamfuata.█
Justiția mă inspiră să o urmez, oriunde merge o voi urma.█

Blog at WordPress.com.
  • Reblog
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • The light shows you what the dark hides.
    • Join 48 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • The light shows you what the dark hides.
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d