Who lives in justice should not confess sins they have not committed, but point out those who commit them and hide behind cassocks. Something few people notice. God abhors the wicked, even if he ignores the truth, because evil springs from his heart.
The cross and the holy covenant. Numbers 15:24 establishes that, if sin was committed by ignorance of the congregation, a sacrifice is offered. However, justice does not depend on the old covenant, but is constant: Numbers 35:33 remains justice yesterday, today, and forever. The old covenant consisted of animal sacrifices, but now it is faith; not to declare the unjust righteous, but for the forgiveness of the sins of the righteous (Habakkuk 2:4; Psalm 40:6; Isaiah 53:9-10; Psalm 22:15; Psalm 118:17-20). The prophecy of the new covenant in Psalm 40:6-7 shows that God does not desire sacrifices, but obedience. Daniel 7:25 warns of a power that would change times and the law, persecuting the saints. Those who killed the righteous one did not love justice nor the holy covenant: Luke 20:14 reveals the intention to kill the heir in order to seize the inheritance. Psalm 22:5 describes his suffering: hands and feet pierced, bones visible, and garments divided (related to Genesis 3:13-15; Proverbs 29:27). Isaiah 53:12 indicates that he bore the sin of many and interceded, in the context of the righteous who were deceived, not the unjust; Daniel 12:10 affirms that only the righteous will be purified. Contradictions are pointed out as evidence of alteration: Genesis 4:8-15 versus Numbers 35:33 and Exodus 21:12-14; Genesis 17:14 versus Leviticus 19:28; Matthew 15:11 versus Isaiah 66:17; 1 Timothy 4:1-6 versus Deuteronomy 14:8 and 2 Maccabees 7:7-11. Matthew 25:33, John 14:3, and Psalm 110:1 show the separation between the righteous and their enemies. Malachi 4:3 declares that the righteous will tread upon the wicked. Matthew 25:41 and Isaiah 66:24 describe the fate of the unjust. Luke 20:15-17 presents the death of the heir and the judgment against the laborers, together with the prophecy of the rejected stone. Isaiah 53:12 announces his future exaltation. Hosea 6:2 is related to the time of restoration. Isaiah 42 is also linked to his manifestation. Psalm 118:7, 10, 20-23 describes the victory of the righteous, the destruction of the unjust, and the entrance of the righteous through the gate of Jehovah. Psalm 110:1-2 reaffirms dominion over enemies. Psalm 58:10 declares that the righteous will rejoice when justice is executed. //54
The betrayal of Judas is a false story. The inconsistencies show that the betrayal of Judas is a Roman invention. However, today their church claims that if there are pedophile priests, it is because not even Jesus could avoid having a traitor like Judas within his church. John 13:18 says that the betrayal occurs so that the Scripture may be fulfilled: ‘He who eats my bread has lifted up his heel against me.’ John 6:64 says that Jesus knew from the beginning who would betray Him. 1 Peter 2:22 says that Jesus never sinned. However, this Scripture about the betrayal speaks of a man who sins, a man who trusted in the man who later betrayed him. But no one who knows in advance who a traitor is could trust in him. Psalm 41:4: ‘I said, Lord, be merciful to me; heal my soul, for I have sinned against You.’ Psalm 41:9: ‘Even my own familiar friend in whom I trusted, who ate my bread, has lifted up his heel against me.’ He does not love his enemies, but God sustains him because this sinner is righteous; therefore, love for the enemy was never the true message that Rome sought to destroy through persecution (Psalm 41:10–12; Proverbs 29:27; Daniel 12:10; Psalm 118:17–20). //63
Ayudando al pensamiento crítico a sacudirse de dogmas impuestos desde la niñez. Soy creador del blog: https://ntiend.me (https://gabriels.work).
Este blog no solo está en español y tiene como propósito respetar la inteligencia frente al dogma.
Este blog no fue creado para defender la Biblia ni para buscarle una interpretación alternativa, porque eso sería darle crédito como un bloque coherente de mensajes. Los textos allí atribuidos a los santos contienen contradicciones demasiado numerosas para etiquetarlas como simples accidentes o diferencias de interpretación. Mientras se atribuye a los santos mensajes tanto de amor como de odio hacia sus enemigos, aquí hay gato encerrado. La cuestión no es cómo interpretar la Biblia o sus enigmas, sino saber hasta dónde llegan las raíces del engaño: si los mensajes están adulterados, no tiene sentido perder el tiempo intentando descifrar enigmas bíblicos posiblemente adulterados por la mano que mató a los santos y se apoderó de sus escritos para arrogarse la autoridad moral de determinar qué escritura, original o escrita por esa mano asesina, debía considerarse “la verdad” y cuál no.
//
Helping critical thinking shake off the dogmas imposed since childhood. I am the creator of the blog: https://ntiend.me (https://gabriels.work).
This blog is not only in Spanish and is intended to respect intelligence in the face of dogma.
This blog was not created to defend the Bible or to seek an alternative interpretation of it, because that would give it credit as a coherent body of messages. The texts attributed there to the saints contain far too many contradictions to dismiss them as mere accidents or differences in interpretation. While the saints are attributed with messages expressing both love and hatred toward their enemies, there is something fishy going on here. The question is not how to interpret the Bible or its enigmas, but rather how deep the roots of the deception go: if the messages have been adulterated, there is no point wasting time trying to decipher biblical enigmas possibly adulterated by the hand that killed the saints and seized their writings in order to arrogate to itself the moral authority to determine which writing, original or written by that murderous hand, was to be considered “the truth” and which was not.
Ver todas las entradas de José Carlos Galindo Hinostroza
