The meat reveals what the disguise hides. The wolf disguises itself as a lamb, but cannot hide its hunger for meat. Too many coincidences. When the statue sheds false blood tears, it is because the false prophet desires more offerings. So he can keep telling those who spill real blood unjustly: ‘God loves you all, every sin is forgiven, except speaking against what we teach or saying that our sacred book contains falsehoods’.

That connection you make between Psalm 82 and Isaiah 66 is key to understanding the logic of a henotheistic system or a divine council, and it exposes a brutal tension that traditional monotheistic frameworks often try to soften or allegorize.

If we break down the texts from that perspective, the narrative is very coherent:

1. The Judgment in the Divine Council (Psalm 82)

This psalm is one of the firmest grounds for biblical henotheism. It does not speak of metaphors or human judges (as it is sometimes interpreted to avoid the implicit polytheism); it speaks of a heavenly court:

The assembly of the gods: Yahweh takes His place in an assembly of real spiritual entities (the Elohim).

The accusation of rebellion: The Supreme God does not reproach them for «not existing,» but for ruling unjustly. Verse 2 is forceful: «How long will you judge unjustly and show partiality to the wicked?»

The alliance of silence: The rebellious gods do not reject the wicked of the Earth; on the contrary, they ally themselves with them. While the Supreme God demands that the weak, the fatherless, and the needy be defended (verses 3 and 4), the lesser gods allow oppression in order to maintain their own share of power and worship.

By corrupting justice, these gods bring about cosmic chaos: «They know not, neither do they understand; they walk on in darkness; all the foundations of the earth are shaken» (verse 5). The rebellion above destabilizes what is below.

2. The Fate of Armed Rebellion (Isaiah 66:24)

When you connect this with Isaiah 66, the outcome of that complicity between the rebellious gods and the wicked men who chose to follow them becomes visible.

The passage describes a post-judgment scenario, a total victory of the Supreme God over those who remained in active rebellion. The «corpses of the men who rebelled» are the physical testimony of having chosen the wrong side: that of the unjust gods. In the end, sharing the fate of entities that preferred darkness and oppression makes them something «abhorrent to all mankind.»

The Logic of Rebellion

The rebellious gods do not reject the wicked because they need them. A lesser god seeking to usurp the place of the Supreme requires a base of subjects to validate his status, regardless of the injustices they commit. That is why the central conflict in these ancient texts is not a philosophical debate about whether the other gods are real or merely made of wood; it is a war over sovereignty, justice, and cosmic rebellion.

The Anti-Satanic Force: Reason Destroys Satanism and Its Occultism. //14

Between life and death: Seven nights on the road’s yellow line #SurvivalTestimony #RealLife //56

The Beast, the False Prophet, and the Myth of God’s Universal Love //113

The Beast, the False Prophet, and the Myth of God’s Universal Love

The disguised worship of Greco-Roman gods today //45

The disguised worship of Greco-Roman gods today

Acts 10:25 ‘Stand up; I am only a man.’ – Saint Peter. ‘That’s right, bow before me.’ Is he the successor of Saint Peter? A man bowed down before Peter… but Peter stopped him: ‘Stand up; I too am a man.’ (Acts 10:25). Peter rejected people bowing before him. He did not accept worship for himself. Today, those who claim to be the successors of Saint Peter extend their hand to have it kissed… and allow others to bow before them. That is not continuation. That is contradiction. So tell me: is that the successor of Saint Peter… or the opposite of Peter, like the emperor Nero? The Roman emperors were called the Caesars. The Caesars exalted themselves, minting coins with their own images. Today, those who claim to be Peter’s successors seem more like the successors of the Caesars, since they also put their image on coins and receive reverence. If this is the opposite… then I have reasons to doubt. And if that Rome influenced the texts of the Bible, what guarantees are there that it did not alter the truth? If Rome stripped peoples of their goods, does that explain why the Bible says: ‘To anyone who takes what is yours, do not demand it back’? //58

Pope Francis stated in 2019 that God loves all men, ‘even the worst.’ But if you read Psalm 5:5 and Psalm 11:5, you will see that those texts clearly say that God hates the wicked. Why does 1 Peter 3:18 claim that the righteous died for the wicked, if Proverbs 29:27 says that the righteous hate the wicked? Because the unjust persecutors of the Roman Empire deceived, passing off their own words as if they were those of the saints they persecuted. When I see the Pope cynically denying the few truths that remained in the Bible, it becomes inevitable to imagine corrupt councils where they decided the content of the Bible and where the Romans destroyed and hid words that they had previously persecuted precisely because they had that purpose. They did not convert to the message of justice; they turned that message into a message of injustice and, once transformed, they spread it. They did not convert to Christianity; they created that religion based on their altered texts, and they did not only create that religion. //95

«