The lamb and the wolf disguised as a lamb react differently when offered meat. The false prophet: ‘No miracle after bowing before the statue? If you have faith as a mustard seed, you’d get the miracle… Try again—with double faith but triple donation’. Too many coincidences.
Would Christ ask for the same thing as the Devil? In Matthew 4:9, Satan said to Jesus: ‘All this I will give you if you fall down and worship me.’ In verse 10, Jesus replied: ‘Away with you, Satan! For it is written: You shall worship Jehovah your God, and Him only you shall serve.’ Did Jesus ever say: ‘It is I whom you must worship’? Deuteronomy 6:13 says: ‘You shall fear Jehovah your God, and Him only you shall serve, and by His name you shall swear.’ The Roman Empire falsified both the images of Jesus and the purpose attributed to Him. Its inconsistencies are not only in its images—where they do not show Jesus, but their own god (Jupiter/Zeus)—but also in its altered message. For example, in the account of the miracle of the lepers: of the ten who were healed, only one returned and fell at Jesus’ feet, giving glory to God. Then Jesus said: ‘Were there not ten cleansed? Where are the nine? Was no one found to return and give glory to God except this foreigner?’ (Luke 17:11–19). Would Christ allow men to fall at His feet as an act of worship, asking for the same thing as the Devil? Consider also this contradiction: Hebrews 1:6 says: ‘Let all the angels of God worship Him,’ while Psalm 97:7 says: ‘Worship Jehovah, all you gods.’ According to Deuteronomy 4:15–19, Jehovah was not shown in any form, to prevent idolatry. These images and contradictory messages are presented as evidence of a religious falsification within the Bible itself. //59
Do you prefer tradition or do you prefer truth? Have you ever in your life read this? Habakkuk 2:18: ‘What is the use of the carved image that its maker has carved? The molten image that teaches lies, so that the maker trusts in his own work by making mute images?’ The lie is not taught by the image, but by the one who uses it to repeat to you the lies of the empire that turned religious images into a business. Their lies are: ‘Love your enemies.’ Are extortionists your friends? Does it sound logical to you that the messenger of justice said: ‘Love the extortionists’? Every day we see how they kill unjustly. Is it not the Devil who asks that we tolerate them? Is it not the Devil who defends them from ‘an eye for an eye’ with lies? Exactly: it was not Jesus who rejected ‘an eye for an eye’; it was the Roman Empire that did so, but it told us that he did it. The empire killed him, but lied by saying that they were forgiven by him. The same empire that renamed the images of its gods: Minerva as Mary, Zeus as Jesus, Mars as Michael. The question is simple: are you going to keep repeating… or are you going to start questioning? Word of Satan: ‘God was mistaken when He said life for life against the murderer. He sent me to say: Do not condemn them to death, that is now a sin.’ Word of Satan: ‘If you do not bless those who curse you, you curse my teachings and you curse me; then I will also curse you on the day of judgment, saying: Depart from me, you cursed; go into the eternal fire prepared for the Devil and his angels…’ (When Satan mixes what he teaches with what he attacked in anger, his sermon becomes incoherent and is exposed as absurd.) //92
Ayudando al pensamiento crítico a sacudirse de dogmas impuestos desde la niñez. Soy creador del blog: https://ntiend.me (https://gabriels.work).
Este blog no solo está en español y tiene como propósito respetar la inteligencia frente al dogma.
Este blog no fue creado para defender la Biblia ni para buscarle una interpretación alternativa, porque eso sería darle crédito como un bloque coherente de mensajes. Los textos allí atribuidos a los santos contienen contradicciones demasiado numerosas para etiquetarlas como simples accidentes o diferencias de interpretación. Mientras se atribuye a los santos mensajes tanto de amor como de odio hacia sus enemigos, aquí hay gato encerrado. La cuestión no es cómo interpretar la Biblia o sus enigmas, sino saber hasta dónde llegan las raíces del engaño: si los mensajes están adulterados, no tiene sentido perder el tiempo intentando descifrar enigmas bíblicos posiblemente adulterados por la mano que mató a los santos y se apoderó de sus escritos para arrogarse la autoridad moral de determinar qué escritura, original o escrita por esa mano asesina, debía considerarse “la verdad” y cuál no.
//
Helping critical thinking shake off the dogmas imposed since childhood. I am the creator of the blog: https://ntiend.me (https://gabriels.work).
This blog is not only in Spanish and is intended to respect intelligence in the face of dogma.
This blog was not created to defend the Bible or to seek an alternative interpretation of it, because that would give it credit as a coherent body of messages. The texts attributed there to the saints contain far too many contradictions to dismiss them as mere accidents or differences in interpretation. While the saints are attributed with messages expressing both love and hatred toward their enemies, there is something fishy going on here. The question is not how to interpret the Bible or its enigmas, but rather how deep the roots of the deception go: if the messages have been adulterated, there is no point wasting time trying to decipher biblical enigmas possibly adulterated by the hand that killed the saints and seized their writings in order to arrogate to itself the moral authority to determine which writing, original or written by that murderous hand, was to be considered “the truth” and which was not.
Ver todas las entradas de José Carlos Galindo Hinostroza
