The Prophecies of Isaiah That Challenge the Religions Created Through Deception by the Roman Empire █
Christianity, Islam, and the Uncomfortable Prophecy for Rome THE COMMON DOGMA (Christianity and Islam)
Christianity and Islam claim that Gabriel announced the virgin birth of Jesus to fulfill Isaiah’s prophecy (Matthew 1 / Quran 19).
But Isaiah 7:14–16 does not announce Jesus, nor does it speak of a “perpetual virgin.”
The sign was given to King Ahaz and was to be fulfilled immediately, before the child knew how to distinguish between good and evil.
Isaiah speaks of a young woman, not of a woman who remained a virgin after childbirth.
The fulfillment occurs with Hezekiah, a faithful king during the time of Ahaz:
He destroys the bronze serpent (2 Kings 18:4–7)
God was with him (Immanuel)
Assyrian defeat prophesied by Isaiah (2 Kings 19:35–37)
The perpetual virgin birth, shared by Christianity and Islam, does not come from Isaiah, but from a later rereading imposed by Rome.
These contradictions do not come from God. A tyrannical empire did not want peoples who demanded respect for their dignity, but peoples on their knees.
Here is the detail of how, according to the biblical texts, Isaiah’s prophecy about the virgin was fulfilled with King Hezekiah.
Around 1440 BC, Jehovah commanded Moses to make a bronze serpent and set it on a pole so that anyone who looked at it would be healed; He never commanded that it be honored, prayed to, or used as an object of prayer or worship.
Context — Numbers 21:4–9 The Israelites complained against God and Moses in the wilderness, and Jehovah sent fiery serpents that bit and killed many. God instructed Moses to make a bronze serpent and put it on a pole. Anyone who was bitten, if they looked at the bronze serpent, would live.
About seven centuries later, around 715 BC, King Hezekiah destroyed the bronze serpent because the people of Israel had begun to worship it, burning incense to it. This was a clear transgression of God’s law and its original purpose as a symbol of healing (Numbers 21:4–9), which is why Hezekiah removed it during his religious reforms, as related in 2 Kings 18:4.
The Assyrian army slept confidently.
The Rabshakeh had challenged Hezekiah, saying:
‘In what do you trust? No god has delivered any people from my hand’ (2 Kings 18:19–35).
Hezekiah went up to the temple and prayed to Jehovah, asking that His name be defended before the nations (2 Kings 19:14–19).
That night, Jehovah sent a single angel, who killed 185,000 Assyrian soldiers (2 Kings 19:35; Isaiah 37:36).
Sennacherib fled to Nineveh, humiliated and without an army (2 Kings 19:36).
This deliverance was not accidental. Isaiah had given an immediate sign to Ahaz: a young woman of his time would conceive, and before the child grew up, Judah would be delivered from its enemies (Isaiah 7:10–16).
Hezekiah, the son of Ahaz, sees that fulfillment (2 Kings 18–19).
Ayudando al pensamiento crítico a sacudirse de dogmas impuestos desde la niñez. Soy creador del blog: https://ntiend.me (https://gabriels.work).
Este blog no solo está en español y tiene como propósito respetar la inteligencia frente al dogma.
Este blog no fue creado para defender la Biblia ni para buscarle una interpretación alternativa, porque eso sería darle crédito como un bloque coherente de mensajes. Los textos allí atribuidos a los santos contienen contradicciones demasiado numerosas para etiquetarlas como simples accidentes o diferencias de interpretación. Mientras se atribuye a los santos mensajes tanto de amor como de odio hacia sus enemigos, aquí hay gato encerrado. La cuestión no es cómo interpretar la Biblia o sus enigmas, sino saber hasta dónde llegan las raíces del engaño: si los mensajes están adulterados, no tiene sentido perder el tiempo intentando descifrar enigmas bíblicos posiblemente adulterados por la mano que mató a los santos y se apoderó de sus escritos para arrogarse la autoridad moral de determinar qué escritura, original o escrita por esa mano asesina, debía considerarse “la verdad” y cuál no.
//
Helping critical thinking shake off the dogmas imposed since childhood. I am the creator of the blog: https://ntiend.me (https://gabriels.work).
This blog is not only in Spanish and is intended to respect intelligence in the face of dogma.
This blog was not created to defend the Bible or to seek an alternative interpretation of it, because that would give it credit as a coherent body of messages. The texts attributed there to the saints contain far too many contradictions to dismiss them as mere accidents or differences in interpretation. While the saints are attributed with messages expressing both love and hatred toward their enemies, there is something fishy going on here. The question is not how to interpret the Bible or its enigmas, but rather how deep the roots of the deception go: if the messages have been adulterated, there is no point wasting time trying to decipher biblical enigmas possibly adulterated by the hand that killed the saints and seized their writings in order to arrogate to itself the moral authority to determine which writing, original or written by that murderous hand, was to be considered “the truth” and which was not.
Ver todas las entradas de José Carlos Galindo Hinostroza
GABRIELS.WORK 