How is it possible that no one has noticed? The false prophet defends the ‘prosperity gospel’: ‘Sow in my pocket and God will make you reap in yours — curiously, only mine never runs empty’. Without sheep to deceive, the wolves reveal their true hunger. When the sheep are safe, the wolves are left without prey and turn on each other.
These are the things I said in 1998 to the kidnapper with the title of psychiatrist, who, like a bought judge, unjustly ruled that I should be confined and drugged at the Pinel clinic in 1998, and then again in 2001: ‘What kind of psychiatrist are you, who locks up mentally healthy people? How much were you paid to falsely accuse me and have me kidnapped? Why do you ask me ‘how are you?’ Do you not see that I am in a straitjacket? What did you expect me to answer: ‘I am very well and quite comfortable’?’ When I was 22 years old and read Exodus 20:5 for the first time, I understood that I had been deceived by the Catholic Church. However, I had not yet read enough of the Bible to understand something crucial: that defending the Bible as a whole in order to protest against idolatry was also a mistake, because it implied defending other falsehoods with which Rome had surrounded that truth. One year later, religious fanatics in my family environment did not tolerate that I called idolatry the Catholic practices they carried out, against which I protested indignantly, since I had also been indoctrinated to practice them from childhood and felt betrayed; that intolerance turned into religious persecution against me, the result of which was the captivity I suffered in a mental institution for weeks as if I were insane. //104
THE WORSHIP OF THE STATUE OF THE ROMAN LEGIONARY – THE OLD ROMAN IDOLATRY RECYCLED. Since before Christ, ancient Rome worshiped statues of various gods, among them Mars, whose sculpture you see here. Do we not see today very similar statues receiving honors? The leaders who promote the cult of their statue today do not say that it is the god Mars, or that it is a Roman legionary… but they represent it as either one: Roman armor, Roman weapons… they only add wings… and call him Michael. In any case, Rome did not leave behind the custom of praying to the image of a Roman soldier, represented precisely as a legionary with his military armor. It is the same Rome that, after killing the righteous, arrogated to itself the right to decide which texts would be part of the Bible. Do you not think that this text, in Romans 13:1–2, was created by Rome to subject the peoples under its tyranny: ‘Let every person be subject to the governing authorities; for there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been established by God… whoever resists authority resists what God has appointed, and those who resist will incur condemnation upon themselves’? And if that authority wants to impose the worship of images, does it not deserve rebellion from those who only wish to worship God? Do we not see, in many of those images, a Roman legionary condemning unarmed civilians for not worshiping his image? Is that not serving Rome and not the God who said about images: ‘You shall not bow down to them nor honor them’ (Exodus 20:5)? //51
Ayudando al pensamiento crítico a sacudirse de dogmas impuestos desde la niñez. Soy creador del blog: https://ntiend.me (https://gabriels.work).
Este blog no solo está en español y tiene como propósito respetar la inteligencia frente al dogma.
Este blog no fue creado para defender la Biblia ni para buscarle una interpretación alternativa, porque eso sería darle crédito como un bloque coherente de mensajes. Los textos allí atribuidos a los santos contienen contradicciones demasiado numerosas para etiquetarlas como simples accidentes o diferencias de interpretación. Mientras se atribuye a los santos mensajes tanto de amor como de odio hacia sus enemigos, aquí hay gato encerrado. La cuestión no es cómo interpretar la Biblia o sus enigmas, sino saber hasta dónde llegan las raíces del engaño: si los mensajes están adulterados, no tiene sentido perder el tiempo intentando descifrar enigmas bíblicos posiblemente adulterados por la mano que mató a los santos y se apoderó de sus escritos para arrogarse la autoridad moral de determinar qué escritura, original o escrita por esa mano asesina, debía considerarse “la verdad” y cuál no.
//
Helping critical thinking shake off the dogmas imposed since childhood. I am the creator of the blog: https://ntiend.me (https://gabriels.work).
This blog is not only in Spanish and is intended to respect intelligence in the face of dogma.
This blog was not created to defend the Bible or to seek an alternative interpretation of it, because that would give it credit as a coherent body of messages. The texts attributed there to the saints contain far too many contradictions to dismiss them as mere accidents or differences in interpretation. While the saints are attributed with messages expressing both love and hatred toward their enemies, there is something fishy going on here. The question is not how to interpret the Bible or its enigmas, but rather how deep the roots of the deception go: if the messages have been adulterated, there is no point wasting time trying to decipher biblical enigmas possibly adulterated by the hand that killed the saints and seized their writings in order to arrogate to itself the moral authority to determine which writing, original or written by that murderous hand, was to be considered “the truth” and which was not.
Ver todas las entradas de José Carlos Galindo Hinostroza