The just reason and express their thoughts. And that is enough to shake empires based on inconsistencies. This is too shocking to ignore. Satan confessed: ‘I have not come to call the righteous to help them, but to make them believe that the wicked can treat them well if they treat them well first’.
Imperial representations of Michael adopt Roman military symbolism and operate as images aligned with Roman power. In that symbolic function, they resemble the ‘angel of Rome’ described in later Jewish traditions more than a figure of resistance to evil. Samael (Hebrew: Sammā’ēl, ‘Poison of God,’ understood as ‘Poison of God’ or ‘Blindness of God,’ rarely ‘Smil,’ ‘Samil,’ or ‘Samiel’) is an archangel in Talmudic and post-Talmudic tradition, described as the accuser (Ha-Satan), seducer, and destroyer (Mashhit). As guardian angel and prince of Rome, he is the archenemy of Israel (and therefore, of Michael). At the beginning of Jewish culture in Europe, Samael established himself as a representative of Christianity—the religion created by the Roman Empire to impose its evil doctrine: ‘Do not resist evil; offer (me) the other cheek’—due to his identification with Rome (precisely for that reason). //52
Pope Francis stated in 2019 that God loves all men, ‘even the worst.’ But if you read Psalm 5:5 and Psalm 11:5, you will see that those texts clearly say that God hates the wicked. Why does 1 Peter 3:18 claim that the righteous died for the wicked, if Proverbs 29:27 says that the righteous hate the wicked? Because the unjust persecutors of the Roman Empire deceived, passing off their own words as if they were those of the saints they persecuted. When I see the Pope cynically denying the few truths that remained in the Bible, it becomes inevitable to imagine corrupt councils where they decided the content of the Bible and where the Romans destroyed and hid words that they had previously persecuted precisely because they had that purpose. They did not convert to the message of justice; they turned that message into a message of injustice and, once transformed, they spread it. They did not convert to Christianity; they created that religion based on their altered texts, and they did not only create that religion. //95
Ayudando al pensamiento crítico a sacudirse de dogmas impuestos desde la niñez. Soy creador del blog: https://ntiend.me (https://gabriels.work).
Este blog no solo está en español y tiene como propósito respetar la inteligencia frente al dogma.
Este blog no fue creado para defender la Biblia ni para buscarle una interpretación alternativa, porque eso sería darle crédito como un bloque coherente de mensajes. Los textos allí atribuidos a los santos contienen contradicciones demasiado numerosas para etiquetarlas como simples accidentes o diferencias de interpretación. Mientras se atribuye a los santos mensajes tanto de amor como de odio hacia sus enemigos, aquí hay gato encerrado. La cuestión no es cómo interpretar la Biblia o sus enigmas, sino saber hasta dónde llegan las raíces del engaño: si los mensajes están adulterados, no tiene sentido perder el tiempo intentando descifrar enigmas bíblicos posiblemente adulterados por la mano que mató a los santos y se apoderó de sus escritos para arrogarse la autoridad moral de determinar qué escritura, original o escrita por esa mano asesina, debía considerarse “la verdad” y cuál no.
//
Helping critical thinking shake off the dogmas imposed since childhood. I am the creator of the blog: https://ntiend.me (https://gabriels.work).
This blog is not only in Spanish and is intended to respect intelligence in the face of dogma.
This blog was not created to defend the Bible or to seek an alternative interpretation of it, because that would give it credit as a coherent body of messages. The texts attributed there to the saints contain far too many contradictions to dismiss them as mere accidents or differences in interpretation. While the saints are attributed with messages expressing both love and hatred toward their enemies, there is something fishy going on here. The question is not how to interpret the Bible or its enigmas, but rather how deep the roots of the deception go: if the messages have been adulterated, there is no point wasting time trying to decipher biblical enigmas possibly adulterated by the hand that killed the saints and seized their writings in order to arrogate to itself the moral authority to determine which writing, original or written by that murderous hand, was to be considered “the truth” and which was not.
Ver todas las entradas de José Carlos Galindo Hinostroza
GABRIELS.WORK 