The just reason and express their thoughts. And that is enough to shake empires based on inconsistencies. This is too shocking to ignore. Satan confessed: ‘I have not come to call the righteous to help them, but to make them believe that the wicked can treat them well if they treat them well first’.

The Anti-Satanic Force: Reason Destroys Satanism and Its Occultism. //14

White horse rider vs the Antichrist – The rider on the white horse brings an eye for an eye. //60

The account of Jesus’ resurrection does not align with the prophecies. //82

A child defends himself from a business that needs all people to be declared guilty since birth. //49

Imperial representations of Michael adopt Roman military symbolism and operate as images aligned with Roman power. In that symbolic function, they resemble the ‘angel of Rome’ described in later Jewish traditions more than a figure of resistance to evil. Samael (Hebrew: Sammā’ēl, ‘Poison of God,’ understood as ‘Poison of God’ or ‘Blindness of God,’ rarely ‘Smil,’ ‘Samil,’ or ‘Samiel’) is an archangel in Talmudic and post-Talmudic tradition, described as the accuser (Ha-Satan), seducer, and destroyer (Mashhit). As guardian angel and prince of Rome, he is the archenemy of Israel (and therefore, of Michael). At the beginning of Jewish culture in Europe, Samael established himself as a representative of Christianity—the religion created by the Roman Empire to impose its evil doctrine: ‘Do not resist evil; offer (me) the other cheek’—due to his identification with Rome (precisely for that reason). //52

Pope Francis stated in 2019 that God loves all men, ‘even the worst.’ But if you read Psalm 5:5 and Psalm 11:5, you will see that those texts clearly say that God hates the wicked. Why does 1 Peter 3:18 claim that the righteous died for the wicked, if Proverbs 29:27 says that the righteous hate the wicked? Because the unjust persecutors of the Roman Empire deceived, passing off their own words as if they were those of the saints they persecuted. When I see the Pope cynically denying the few truths that remained in the Bible, it becomes inevitable to imagine corrupt councils where they decided the content of the Bible and where the Romans destroyed and hid words that they had previously persecuted precisely because they had that purpose. They did not convert to the message of justice; they turned that message into a message of injustice and, once transformed, they spread it. They did not convert to Christianity; they created that religion based on their altered texts, and they did not only create that religion. //95

«