Why does nobody talk about this? The serpent cannot endure righteousness; that’s why it wants you to bend and kiss the feet of its false gods. Idolatry taught from childhood paves the way to mandatory military service and meaningless death.

Between life and death: Seven nights on the road’s yellow line #SurvivalTestimony #RealLife //56

Spacecraft Arrived Before the Fire | Sci-Fi Inspired by Ancient Texts //197

The Judas Betrayal and the Long-Haired Jesus: Two Lies Exposed //47

The Judas Betrayal and the Long-Haired Jesus: Two Lies Exposed

Warning: Reading this could destroy your blind faith in the dogmas that Rome imposed as unquestionable truth through bloodshed, plunder, and violence. //233

Warning: Reading this could destroy your blind faith in the dogmas that Rome imposed as unquestionable truth through bloodshed, plunder, and violence.

Did the serpent falsely accuse Jesus of having taught love for enemies? Genesis 3:14–15: ‘And Jehovah God said to the serpent: Because you have done this, you are cursed above all beasts… and I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your seed and her seed…’ Proverbs 29:27: ‘The righteous detest the wicked, and the wicked detest the righteous.’ //98

Acts 10:25 ‘Stand up; I am only a man.’ – Saint Peter. ‘That’s right, bow before me.’ Is he the successor of Saint Peter? A man bowed down before Peter… but Peter stopped him: ‘Stand up; I too am a man.’ (Acts 10:25). Peter rejected people bowing before him. He did not accept worship for himself. Today, those who claim to be the successors of Saint Peter extend their hand to have it kissed… and allow others to bow before them. That is not continuation. That is contradiction. So tell me: is that the successor of Saint Peter… or the opposite of Peter, like the emperor Nero? The Roman emperors were called the Caesars. The Caesars exalted themselves, minting coins with their own images. Today, those who claim to be Peter’s successors seem more like the successors of the Caesars, since they also put their image on coins and receive reverence. If this is the opposite… then I have reasons to doubt. And if that Rome influenced the texts of the Bible, what guarantees are there that it did not alter the truth? If Rome stripped peoples of their goods, does that explain why the Bible says: ‘To anyone who takes what is yours, do not demand it back’? //58

«