If the law condemns the one who leads the blind astray, how can it be true that Jehovah loved Jacob?

If the law condemns the one who causes the blind to go astray, how can it be true that Jehovah loved Jacob? █

Jacob Deceived a Blind Man… And God Loved Him?

Did you know that the Bible says:

“Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated”
(Romans 9:13)

But… let’s look at the facts.

Jacob took advantage of his brother’s weakness to obtain the birthright:
(Genesis 25:29–34)

And then he deceived his own father, who was blind, to steal the blessing:
(Genesis 27)

Is that justice?

The same Scripture condemns that kind of act:

“Cursed is anyone who leads the blind astray on the road.”
(Deuteronomy 27:18)

It also says:

“You hate all who do iniquity.”
(Psalms 5:5)

So the question arises:

How can God love a usurper who deceives a blind man?

Can truth contradict itself?

Or…

Could it be that the Roman Empire presented a distorted message?

A usurping message… like Jacob himself?

If the system teaches you to honor a usurper… who really wrote the story?

In Genesis 25:29–34, the text does not say that Jacob deceived Esau, but that Esau sold him his birthright.

The explicit deception does appear later, when Jacob deceives his blind father
(Genesis 27).

However, Esau himself interprets both events as the same act of usurpation in Genesis 27:36, when he says:

“Is he not rightly named Jacob? For he has supplanted me these two times: he took away my birthright, and now he has taken away my blessing.”
(Jacob means: “He who grasps the heel.”)

Is it a coincidence that the serpent in Genesis 3:15 is marked by striking the heel, and that Jacob is born grasping the heel and is called “Supplanter”?

Word of the serpent:
“Did God really tell you not to eat that fruit (Genesis 3:1), nor the flesh of the pig (Deuteronomy 14:8)?… Roman scribe, make it pass as the word of God:… Nothing that God created is bad, if it is received with thanksgiving (1 Timothy 4:1–6).”

---

Word of Satan:
“Servant of my empire, write also: ‘The whole world lies under the evil one (1 John 5:19), and so that they submit to me, add:

‘Let every person be subject to the governing authorities; for there is no authority except from God (Romans 13:1)… for God has placed me so that I may never be overthrown (Revelation 13:5).’”

---

Word of Satan:
“Roman, now write that Jesus rose again and that his return will be from the clouds, so that people wait for an impossible justice while I perpetuate myself with your empire in power, and love for one’s enemy is preached so that they do not demand back their gold when we steal it.”

EMPERORS AND COUNCILS THAT DEFINED THE BIBLE

CONSTANTINE I — Council of Nicaea (325 A.D.)
THEODOSIUS I — Synod of Rome (382 A.D.)
THEODOSIUS II — Council of Ephesus (431 A.D.)
MARCIAN — Council of Chalcedon (451 A.D.)

OBJECTIVE:
To eliminate any text that would contradict
the interests of the Empire.

“Let every man be subject to the authorities…”
“do not claim what is yours…”

Rome plundered and did not want
resistance against its abuses.

Word of the serpent:
“So God told you: do not eat that fruit (Genesis 3:1), nor pork (Deuteronomy 14:8)?… Roman scribe, pass off as the word of God:… Nothing God created is evil, if you receive it with thanksgiving (1 Timothy 4:1–6).”

Word of Satan:
“Servant of my empire, write this as well: ‘The whole world is under the evil one (1 John 5:19), and so that they submit to me, add:

‘Let every person submit to the higher authorities; for there is no authority except from God (Romans 13:1)… for God appointed me so that I may never be overthrown (Revelation 13:5).’”

Word of Satan:
“Roman, now write that Jesus was resurrected and that his return will be from the clouds, so that people will await an impossible justice while I perpetuate myself in power through your empire, and love of the enemy is preached so that they do not demand their gold back when we steal it from them.”

EMPERORS AND COUNCILS
THAT DEFINED THE BIBLE

CONSTANTINE I — Council of Nicaea (325 AD)
THEODOSIUS I — Synod of Rome (382 AD)
THEODOSIUS II — Council of Ephesus (431 AD)
MARCIAN — Council of Chalcedon (451 AD)

OBJECTIVE:
Eliminate any text that contradicted
the interests of the Empire.

“Let every man submit to the authorities…”
“do not demand what is yours…”

Rome plundered and did not want
resistance to its abuses.