He’s not a pastor who fell; he’s a wolf who was exposed. The wolf doesn’t fall from heaven—it climbs the pulpit. It goes beyond the obvious. The false prophet: ‘God loves sheep, but He does not protect them from wolves because God also loves wolves and wants them to feed on them; God loves everyone’.
Emperors and councils that defined the Bible: Constantine I — Council of Nicaea (325 AD); Theodosius I — Synod of Rome (382 AD); Theodosius II — Council of Ephesus (431 AD); Marcian — Council of Chalcedon (451 AD). Objective: to eliminate any text that contradicted the interests of the Empire. ‘Let every man be subject to the authorities…’ ‘Do not claim what is yours…’ Rome plundered and did not want resistance to its abuses. //97
Would Christ ask for the same thing as the Devil? In Matthew 4:9, Satan said to Jesus: ‘All this I will give you if you fall down and worship me.’ In verse 10, Jesus replied: ‘Away with you, Satan! For it is written: ‘You shall worship the Lord your God, and Him only you shall serve.» Did Jesus ever say: ‘It is I whom you must worship’? Deuteronomy 6:13 says: ‘You shall fear the Lord your God, and Him only you shall serve, and by His name you shall swear.’ The Roman Empire falsified both the images of Jesus and the purpose attributed to Him. Its inconsistencies are not only in its images—where they do not show Jesus, but their own god (Jupiter/Zeus)—but also in its altered message. For example, in the account of the miracle of the lepers: of the ten who were healed, only one returned and fell at Jesus’ feet, giving glory to God. Then Jesus said: ‘Were there not ten cleansed? Where are the nine? Was no one found to return and give glory to God except this foreigner?’ (Luke 17:11–19). Would Christ allow men to fall at His feet as an act of worship, asking for the same thing as the Devil? Consider also this contradiction: Hebrews 1:6 says: ‘Let all the angels of God worship Him,’ while Psalm 97:7 says: ‘Worship the Lord, all you gods.’ According to Deuteronomy 4:15–19, the Lord was not shown in any form, to prevent idolatry. These images and contradictory messages are presented as evidence of a religious falsification within the Bible itself. //59
Ayudando al pensamiento crítico a sacudirse de dogmas impuestos desde la niñez. Soy creador del blog: https://ntiend.me (https://gabriels.work).
Este blog no solo está en español y tiene como propósito respetar la inteligencia frente al dogma.
Este blog no fue creado para defender la Biblia ni para buscarle una interpretación alternativa, porque eso sería darle crédito como un bloque coherente de mensajes. Los textos allí atribuidos a los santos contienen contradicciones demasiado numerosas para etiquetarlas como simples accidentes o diferencias de interpretación. Mientras se atribuye a los santos mensajes tanto de amor como de odio hacia sus enemigos, aquí hay gato encerrado. La cuestión no es cómo interpretar la Biblia o sus enigmas, sino saber hasta dónde llegan las raíces del engaño: si los mensajes están adulterados, no tiene sentido perder el tiempo intentando descifrar enigmas bíblicos posiblemente adulterados por la mano que mató a los santos y se apoderó de sus escritos para arrogarse la autoridad moral de determinar qué escritura, original o escrita por esa mano asesina, debía considerarse “la verdad” y cuál no.
//
Helping critical thinking shake off the dogmas imposed since childhood. I am the creator of the blog: https://ntiend.me (https://gabriels.work).
This blog is not only in Spanish and is intended to respect intelligence in the face of dogma.
This blog was not created to defend the Bible or to seek an alternative interpretation of it, because that would give it credit as a coherent body of messages. The texts attributed there to the saints contain far too many contradictions to dismiss them as mere accidents or differences in interpretation. While the saints are attributed with messages expressing both love and hatred toward their enemies, there is something fishy going on here. The question is not how to interpret the Bible or its enigmas, but rather how deep the roots of the deception go: if the messages have been adulterated, there is no point wasting time trying to decipher biblical enigmas possibly adulterated by the hand that killed the saints and seized their writings in order to arrogate to itself the moral authority to determine which writing, original or written by that murderous hand, was to be considered “the truth” and which was not.
Ver todas las entradas de José Carlos Galindo Hinostroza
