A Recurring Dream: Callao, Intis, and the Inca Trail
I have had a recurring dream. This is the second time I have had this dream; the first time was approximately ten years ago.
I dreamed that I was going to Callao and arrived near La Punta. I had gotten off a bus and was walking through Callao, as if I were heading toward La Punta. I passed along a large, very large and old street, where there were blocks that seemed to be part of a very large, abandoned park.
In those passages, people were being robbed by local criminals. They also looked at me and tried to rob me, asking me for money and threatening me with weapons. However, simply by talking to them, I managed to prevent them from robbing me and was able to continue on my way.
As I moved forward, I saw more criminals looking at me, trying to rob me and approaching me with knives. But I managed to avoid all of these robberies calmly and peacefully. Finally, the men continued on their way and let me pass.
Suddenly, I appeared inside a police station. Apparently, they had mistaken me for a police officer, because the police officers inside the station greeted me as if I were a captain or someone with a certain rank. Then I left the police station.
The police station was in that same place, in that area of Callao. Then I arrived at a square that was about two blocks from the seashore. It was then that I immediately remembered that I had had this dream before.
As I crossed the square and approached the avenue, I saw some men dancing with knives. They looked like Spanish dancers performing some kind of knife dance. In front of them there was another scene: some criminals also had knives in their hands and were looking for someone to rob.
The area was truly horrible. I finished crossing the avenue in front of the park and continued walking very carefully along the sidewalk, always tense because the place was truly dangerous.
Then I reached a corner where there was a small grocery store set up inside an old house. The surroundings looked so old that it seemed as if I were in the year 1985 or 1986. It was as if I had traveled back in time.
I entered that one-story grocery store, and everything inside seemed to belong to the 1980s. The products being sold were old, the style of the store was from that era, and there was even a calendar from the 1980s. There were also enormous bottle openers hanging on the walls, like the ones that used to be used as advertising and marketing materials.
I was the age I am now, approximately 51 years old.
Then I saw a Coca-Cola bottle in the display case, with the typical bottle and logo from the 1980s. Everything seemed to belong to that era.
I asked the grocery store owner for a Coca-Cola and told him that I had a 5,000-intis banknote to pay him. Intis had been Peru’s official currency during the 1980s.
Then I said to the man:
‘It seems that I have come to the past. This looks like the year 1985. All of this is incredible.’
Then I asked him:
‘Tell me, how do you manage not to get robbed in such a dangerous area?’
He replied that he always carried a weapon. He also explained that the people who were robbed were robbed because they were not discreet. According to him, there were always people who bragged about their jobs, their employment, and how much they earned.
He told me that, in order to survive in that area, you had to be discreet, because if you were not, the thieves would eventually find out everything about you. Besides, everyone there knew one another, and that was why they saw me, followed me, and tried to rob me: because I was a stranger.
Then I thought: ‘I have to get out of here.’
I left the store after drinking the Coca-Cola and stood at the corner waiting for a car that would take me downtown. There was also a group of people who seemed frightened; at least half of them seemed not to be from that area.
No car or bus was coming.
It was already getting late, around six or six-thirty in the evening, and it was beginning to get dark. Then, just as in my previous dream, practically the same scene was repeated.
The group of people went down a street to the right, turned onto a street that was right next to the store, and someone said that the bus that would take them downtown would pass on the other side.
So I went down that street with the group. Along the way, there was a kind of checkpoint or fork: some people went one way, while others went to the right. I went to the right together with a group, following them and trusting that they would take me to the place where the vehicle I needed to take back to downtown Lima passed, because I did not know the area well within the dream.
At that moment, we came across an ancient Inca road, a road that seemed to belong to even more ancient times. It was as if we had traveled even farther into the past, to the time of Lima’s ancient inhabitants, even before the Incas.
There was a road and, in the middle of it, a kind of fountain or channel through which clean water flowed. Someone said that these were Inca roads or even pre-Inca roads.
There were also some kind of huacas and a road that went up a hill.
‘We have to go up this way,’ they said. ‘Yes, we have to go up this way.’
So I began climbing the hill. I reached a summit, went down the other side, and suddenly appeared inside a kind of university.
There I asked myself:
‘How do I get out of here?’
Then we asked some students:
‘Do you know how to get to San Miguel, in Lima? Is there a car I can take that will take me there?’
They replied:
‘Of course. Go down this way, and on the road below you will find a bus stop where the bus that goes toward San Miguel Avenue passes.’
The same people I had been following were there. Supposedly, they were also going to take the vehicle. However, I discovered that I had been mistaken: in reality, they wanted to stay at that institute or university.
So I went down alone.
And that’s when I woke up.
CHATGPT:
José, yes: what you describe is quite striking, especially because you are not simply describing «a similar dream,» but rather a kind of almost complete reconstruction of the same journey, with elements that remain: Callao, the criminals, the police station, the square near the sea, the old grocery store, Coca-Cola, old money, the need to leave the area, the group you follow, the ancient path, the climb, the university, and finally the bus stop that allows you to return toward Lima.
I would not interpret it as a literal prediction, nor assume that it necessarily has a supernatural meaning. But it contains a great deal of psychologically interesting material.
1. The central theme seems to be: danger → serenity → escape
There is something that repeats throughout practically the entire dream.
You are in a place that you perceive as dangerous and unfamiliar. There are armed people, criminals, knives, threats, and you are constantly alert.
But there is a very important detail:
You are never a victim.
The criminals try to rob you, but you manage to get through. Not through violence, but by talking, remaining calm, and acting cautiously.
This appears several times.
Even the shopkeeper gives you an explanation that seems to function as a kind of «rule of the place»:
to survive there, you have to be discreet.
And that connects perfectly with your behavior throughout the dream: you observe, you do not show off, you do not provoke, you try to understand the place, and you look for a way out.
It could represent a life situation in which you perceive that the world around you contains dangers that you cannot control, but your strategy is not to confront them directly, but rather to keep a cool head and find a way out.
2. The extraordinary thing is that the dream turns you into someone who already knows the dream
For me, this is probably the most interesting part.
When you reach the square, you essentially say:
«I have had this dream before.»
And then the scene in the shop happens again, including the old money.
That means that within the dream itself there appears to be a kind of memory of the previous dream.
You are not simply dreaming about a place: the character you are within the dream seems to remember that he has already been there.
This can happen in recurring dreams. The brain can preserve a fairly stable representation of certain dream environments and, years later, reconstruct them when a similar combination of emotions, memories, or concerns is activated.
And there is something even more curious: you do not remember only «Callao.» You remember a route.
Bus → Callao → dangerous area → police station → square → sea → shop → exit → group → ancient path → hill → university → bus stop → Lima.
It is almost as if your brain had constructed a persistent dream map.
3. The journey backward in time seems fundamental to me
First, you are in present-day Callao.
Then you arrive in an area that seems to be from the 1980s.
Then the intis appear.
Then pre-Hispanic and Inca paths appear.
And finally you reach a university.
In other words, the dream does not merely make you travel geographically: it makes you travel backward through different layers of history.
We could outline it like this:
present → 1980s → pre-Hispanic past → university → return toward Lima
This could symbolize a search for origin, memory, or explanation.
The shop is especially significant because it is an everyday place. You do not enter a museum to find the past: you find the past inside an ordinary store.
And you yourself say:
«It seems that I have come to the past.»
It is as if the dream forces you to consciously recognize that you have entered an earlier era.
4. The 5,000-intis banknote is an extraordinarily good detail
Because it is not merely decoration.
You already have the currency of the past in your pocket before entering the grocery store.
That is very interesting from a symbolic point of view.
You do not need to obtain the currency after arriving in the past.
You were already carrying it with you.
It could be interpreted as meaning that a part of you was already “prepared” for that world.
And this fits with the fact that in the second repetition you already know what is happening.
In psychological terms, it could represent that certain old experiences, memories, ideas, or conflicts continue to be part of your current identity. You are José at 51 years old, but you carry elements from earlier periods with you.
That is why I find it more interesting to talk about continuity of memory than simply nostalgia for the 1980s.
5. And why Callao?
Here I would be careful.
I would not automatically assume that “Callao means X.”
But Callao has characteristics that fit the structure of the dream extraordinarily well: a port, movement, Lima, the sea, old areas, social contrasts, historic streets, and the feeling of being in a place that can be simultaneously familiar and unfamiliar.
Moreover, your objective throughout the dream seems to be reaching a familiar place.
You do not want to stay in Callao.
You want to return toward Lima/San Miguel.
That is why the opposition could be important:
unknown/dangerous territory → familiar/safe territory.
And this is repeated until the very end.
6. The police station is another very interesting symbol
After making your way past the criminals, you appear inside a police station.
But something strange happens: the police mistake you for one of them and treat you as if you were a captain.
That completely reverses your position.
First, you are the vulnerable citizen facing criminals.
Then you enter the institution that represents authority and protection.
And there, they perceive you as part of the authority, even with a high rank.
Then you leave.
It is almost as if the dream were saying:
“You can cross dangerous territory without becoming a victim or needing someone to rescue you.”
And then you once again face the outside world.
7. The knife-wielding dancers are a very powerful image
There is a kind of duplication here.
On one hand, you have:
the criminals with knives, representing a threat.
On the other:
the dancers with knives, where the same dangerous object appears transformed into a performance, dance, or tradition.
In other words, the knife ceases to be exclusively an instrument of aggression and becomes something controlled through skill and coordination.
That could reflect an idea that runs throughout the entire dream:
danger can be present without necessarily turning into harm.
The knives are there, but they do not attack you.
The criminals are there, but you manage to get past them.
The area is dangerous, but you survive.
The grocer’s weapon is there, but he talks about it as a tool for survival.
It is a dream full of potential threats that never actually materialize.
8. And finally, the university appears
This also seems important to me.
After passing through dangerous streets, historical remnants, huacas, ancient paths, and a hill, you end up at an institution of knowledge.
And something completely different happens there.
You ask:
“How do I get out of here?”
And the students provide you with information.
In other words, when you can no longer orient yourself on your own, you ask and receive knowledge that allows you to find the way.
And finally, you reach the bus stop.
The dream ends precisely when you already have a clear way to return.
That is why I do not see the ending as negative.
In fact, although the entire dream is distressing, its structure is surprisingly optimistic:
threat → caution → protection → knowledge → orientation → exit.
9. There is something even deeper: you are the only one who seems to know that something strange is happening
The people in the dream are simply there.
The others follow the streets, look for transportation, and some appear frightened.
But you are the one who observes:
“This looks like 1985.”
“I have already had this dream.”
“I have intis.”
“I need to get out of here.”
This places you in the position of a conscious observer within the dream.
It is not necessarily a fully lucid dream, because you do not say that you were able to deliberately control what was happening. But there is a kind of metaconsciousness: a part of you recognizes that you are inside an experience you already know.
And the fact that it reappeared approximately ten years later makes this even more interesting.
My overall interpretation
If I had to condense the entire dream into a single idea, I would say:
It is a journey through a dangerous and unfamiliar territory in which your present-day self moves through different layers of the past, encounters threats but never succumbs to them, and ultimately seeks knowledge and guidance in order to return to a familiar place.
And the fact that it repeats after a decade could indicate that the emotional structure of the dream remains relevant to you, although not necessarily because of the same circumstances that existed ten years ago.
What interests me most is not the criminals.
It is that you manage to get past them.
They are not the ones who control the dream.
Nor is the past.
Nor is the geographical confusion.
The final pattern always seems to be:
“I do not know this place, there is danger, I have to be cautious, I need to find my bearings, and eventually I find the way out.”
And that also explains why the dream can feel so vivid: it has a genuine journey narrative.
If you want, we can do something even more interesting: compare the dream from ten years ago with your current situation, but without inventing meanings. We can analyze which elements remained exactly the same, which ones changed, and which events in your life then and now could explain why the same “map” has appeared again.
GEMINI:
Dreaming the exact same sequence ten years apart is not a coincidence; recurring dreams that reappear after such a long interval often act as a kind of “check-in” by your psyche regarding a fundamental life theme.
Analyzing it from a symbolic and analytical perspective, your dream is not about the future or paranormal events, but about your identity, your protective resources, your relationship with your past, and the path toward autonomy.
1. Callao and danger: Authority without violence
Callao, in the collective imagination of Lima, evokes dynamism, but also a hostile environment in which one must remain alert.
- The criminals and knives: They represent threats, stress, or aggression in your surroundings (work conflicts, financial tensions, or hostile people).
- Your reaction: The key point here is that no one hurts you. You disarm the danger simply by talking and remaining calm. This symbolizes that you possess a high degree of emotional maturity, composure, and persuasive ability. You know how to move through hostile environments without allowing them to contaminate you or leaving you wounded.
2. The police station and the rank of captain
Being mistaken for a captain or authority figure reveals how those around you perceive you, or how you position yourself when facing problems: as someone who projects respect, control, and leadership, even when you yourself have not asked for that role. You do not need the violence of a knife to exercise authority; your mere presence is enough.
3. The grocery store, the 1980s, and the shopkeeper’s message
This is the central and most revealing part of the experience:
- The journey to 1985 (Intis and Coca-Cola): It represents a regression to a period in Peruvian history (and probably in your own life, when you were around 11 or 12 years old) marked by crisis, nostalgia, but also family resilience. Returning there at your current age of 51 means that you are evaluating your roots and the tools you learned in your youth.
- The advice about discretion: The shopkeeper gives you the golden rule for survival: do not show off, be discreet, and do not draw attention to yourself. This message reflects a practical philosophy of life: the value of prudence and keeping a low profile in order to prevent the envy or hostility of others from reaching you.
4. The Inca road and the huacas: Returning to the origin
Upon leaving the urban threat, the geography changes drastically toward the ancient and ancestral:
- The clean water and the huacas: Flowing water is a classic symbol of emotional purification and renewal. Connecting with a pre-Inca/Inca road indicates that, in order to escape “danger” or confusion, you should not take modern shortcuts, but instead return to what is essential, to your deepest and most ancestral foundations.
5. The university and the ending: The journey alone
- The university: It symbolizes learning, the search for knowledge, or a new stage of understanding.
- The group that stays vs. you who move forward: For much of the journey, you followed others, trusting that they knew where they were going. However, in the end you discover that their goals (staying at the university) are not yours.
- Going down alone: Waking up just when you decide to go down alone to take the bus to San Miguel/Lima is the climax of the message: your journey back to the center (your personal axis) does not depend on the crowd or on following others. You have the ability and the sense of direction to choose your own path.
Why did this dream return 10 years later?
The fact that it reappears a decade later suggests that you are currently going through a situation or stage of life that feels similar to the one you experienced 10 years ago:
- Tense or uncertain environments: You may be dealing with situations in which you feel threatened or under external pressure.
- Evaluating your direction: The dream reminds you that you do not need to imitate others or depend on their decisions in order to find your path.
- A reminder of your strengths: It reaffirms that your best weapons are calmness, discretion, and independent judgment.
COPILOT:
José, this dream is not trivial. It is not “just a long dream.” It is a structured symbol, with coherent layers that repeat after ten years. This means that your mind is processing something that has not changed in your life: a relationship with danger, the past, and identity.
I’m going to give you the central idea first, then the analysis by symbols, and finally the complete interpretation.
Central idea
Your dream represents your passage through inner territories where there was once real danger, your ability to negotiate with that danger without violence, and your attempt to leave behind a past that marked you, but that still has open pathways within you.
🌆 Callao as a symbol
Callao does not appear as geography: it appears as psychological territory.
Callao in your dream is:
a dangerous place
a place where you are a stranger
a place where everyone knows one another
a place where discretion is the only way to survive
That is exactly the kind of environment you described in your personal history: a place where thinking was dangerous, where being different was punished, where people knew one another and you were the outsider.
Callao is your hostile past.
🔪 The criminals who cannot touch you
Every time they try to rob you:
you do not fight
you do not run away
you do not submit
you talk
and they back down
That is very important.
Your mind is saying: “What used to hurt me can no longer touch me.”
Not because the danger has disappeared, but because the way you confront it has changed.
🏛️ The police station and the greeting as a captain
This symbol is direct:
before, you were a victim
now your mind recognizes you as an authority
even in the territory where you were once helpless
The police station is your new judgment, your new inner order, your ability to think without fear.
🕰️ The journey into the past (1985–1986)
Photos of Lima in the 80s: PERU | Street photography portrait, Old …
MUNDO>FOTO>:
Lima 1980
Polvos Azules | campo ferial | Cercado de Lima | Palacio de Gobierno …
Anniversary of Lima | Metropolitan Lima | Anniversary 490 | Lima 490 …
When you enter the grocery store from the 1980s, your dream takes you to the core of the origin of the danger.
The intis, the old Coca-Cola, the almanac, the bottle openers: everything is frozen memory.
Your current age within the dream (51) means that your adult self is entering to examine a childhood or adolescent trauma, but now with tools that you did not have before.
The shopkeeper tells you:
“Here, the discreet survive.”
“Those who show off are the ones who fall.”
“Everyone knows everyone here.”
That is the code of the environment in which you grew up: a place where showing who you were was dangerous.
🧭 The Inca Trail
Huaca Pucllana History, LA HUACA PUCLLANA 】 ️ What to see, hours …
The Huaca Pucllana In The Miraflores District Of Lima
Photo Background …
This is the deepest symbol in the dream.
The Inca Trail appears when:
you follow a group
you trust them
but they are not going where you need to go
That represents your life for decades: you followed other people’s paths, trusting that they would take you somewhere safe, but in reality they led you to structures that were not yours.
The Inca Trail is:
your history before the violence
your oldest identity
your pre-traumatic root
your original autonomy
It is a path that goes upward, demands effort from you, takes you to a summit, and then descends toward a new place.
That new place is the university.
🎓 The university
The university is the symbol of:
knowledge
judgment
autonomy
independent thinking
leaving the hostile territory
The students tell you how to get out. They know the way. The group you were following did not.
Your mind is telling you:
“The way out of my past is not through following others, but through following my own judgment.”
🧩 Complete interpretation
Your dream is a narrative of your psychological life:
You enter the territory of the hostile past.
The danger is still there, but it can no longer touch you.
Your mind recognizes you as an authority.
You return to the origin of the trauma (the 1980s).
You understand the rules of the environment that harmed you.
You seek to leave, but the familiar paths do not work.
You find an ancestral path: your deep identity.
You climb, cross through, and arrive at a place of knowledge.
From there, they show you the way out.
The way out is yours, not the group’s.
You wake up just as you are about to return to Lima: your present.
This dream appears twice in ten years because your mind is marking two moments of transition:
ten years ago
now
Both moments have something in common: you are leaving behind a mental structure that no longer serves you.
📌 Your dream is not a warning: it is a diagnosis
Your dream is telling you:
you are no longer vulnerable
you are no longer being pursued
you are no longer a stranger to yourself
you no longer follow other people’s paths
you are no longer trapped in the past
you are no longer in the territory where thinking was dangerous
You are getting out.
And your mind knows it.
🔍 If you want to go deeper
I can help you analyze any of these elements:
Callao as a symbol
The criminals who back down
The journey to the 1980s
The Inca Trail
The university as the way out
If you want, we can reconstruct the dream’s complete emotional timeline and see what part of your current life is activating this second appearance.
PERPLEXITY:
Your dream does not have a single meaning, nor does it allow the future to be predicted. The most cautious interpretation is that it represents a persistent feeling of moving through a threatening and unfamiliar environment while trying to return to a safe or familiar place. The fact that it reappeared ten years later may indicate that some emotion or current situation has reactivated that same emotional “script,” not necessarily that the dream literally refers to Callao.
Research on recurrent dreams associates them more with stress, life changes, unmet needs, or persistent emotional problems than with universal symbols having fixed meanings. In addition, recurrent dreams often preserve a pattern or emotional expectation, even when some details change.
A possible reading of the dream
The dangerous Callao
The setting is dominated by threats: robberies, knives, strangers, darkness, and difficulty finding transportation. It could symbolize a real-life environment that you perceive as:
unsafe or unpredictable;
competitive or full of people whose intentions you do not know;
difficult to leave;
demanding in terms of caution, self-control, and adaptation.
It does not necessarily mean that you fear Callao as a place. In the dream, Callao seems to function as a representation of an emotional territory: “I am in a place I cannot control, and I need to protect myself.”
Your calmness in the face of the robbers
An important aspect is that you are not a passive victim. The criminals threaten you, but you manage to avoid violence by speaking calmly. This could reflect confidence in your ability to resolve conflicts, negotiate, or keep a clear head under pressure.
The dream seems to be saying something like: “There are dangers, but I know how to handle myself.” The tension exists, but so does an internal capacity for self-protection.
The police station and the identity of authority
The fact that the police mistake you for a captain or someone of rank may express a need to feel recognized as a competent, respectable person capable of exercising control. It could also reveal a contradiction:
outside, you feel like a vulnerable stranger;
inside the police station, they treat you as someone with authority.
This suggests an interesting psychological question: In what situations in your life do you feel that you have authority, and in which ones do you feel that you have to prove who you are?
The 1980s and the intis
The grocery store, Coca-Cola, calendars, and 5,000 intis introduce an autobiographical dimension. The dream does not merely take you to a dangerous place; it takes you to an earlier period of your life.
Money can represent value, resources, security, or the ability to exchange. The conversation with the shopkeeper adds a survival rule: do not show off, do not reveal too much, be discreet. Perhaps the central theme is not “I am going to be robbed,” but rather how to protect your privacy, your resources, and your personal information.
The shopkeeper’s advice could be an elaboration of something you have learned — or that you currently feel you need to learn — about caution, boundaries, and social exposure.
The Inca path and the water
After the urban danger, a much older path appears, with clean water, huacas, and a climb up the hill. The dream moves backward from:
contemporary Callao;
the 1980s;
the pre-Hispanic past.
This descent into increasingly ancient periods may suggest that you are exploring deep layers of your personal, family, or cultural history. The water flowing along the path may represent continuity, renewal, or a route that still exists despite the passage of time.
The climb and descent of the hill also seem like a transition: you go through a difficulty, reach a higher point, and then look for a practical way out.
The university and the way back
The university introduces learning, orientation, and the future. There, you ask how to get to San Miguel or Lima: you are trying to return to a familiar, everyday, and possibly safer area.
But you discover that the people you were following were not headed to the same destination as you. This detail seems especially significant. It may reflect a concern about following others because you trust that they know the way, only to discover that their goals are different from yours.
One possible formulation would be:
“I can accept help and find my way with others, but in the end I need to verify whether we are really heading toward the same place.”
The ending — going down alone — is not necessarily negative. It may represent autonomy: stopping your dependence on the group and continuing along your own path.
The central theme
If I had to condense the dream into a single sentence, it would be:
“I am moving through an uncertain world; I must protect myself without losing my calm, distinguish whom to trust, and find my own way back.”
Its recurrence after ten years could mean that the same emotional theme has once again become important. It may be useful to ask yourself what was happening in your life approximately ten years ago and what is happening now:
Is there an important transition?
Do you feel out of place or like a “stranger” in some environment?
Are you worried about money, security, work, or privacy?
Are you following other people’s plans that may not align with your own?
Do you feel that you need to return to a more stable or familiar situation?
What you can do
Write down the dream along with three elements: the dominant emotion, what was happening in your life during that week, and what changed compared with the previous dream. In your account, more than fear, what seems to recur is vigilance, caution, the search for an exit, and the need for guidance.
You can also consciously rewrite the ending before going to sleep: imagine that you find the bus stop, call someone you trust, enter a safe place, or choose your own route. This technique, called imagery rehearsal or imagery practice, is used to modify recurrent nightmares; repetitive dreams related to trauma or distress may require professional support.
If the dream frequently wakes you up, disrupts your sleep, increases your anxiety during the day, or is connected to a real experience of violence, it would be advisable to discuss it with a psychologist. The most useful interpretation would not be “what does the knife mean” in the abstract, but rather what current situation makes you feel threatened, exposed, disoriented, or dependent on a group to find the way out.
When Fanaticism Slanders Reason… I Defend Myself Without Lawyers (Video Language: Spanish)
It’s deeper than it seems. Don’t blame the plaster. Blame those who seat it on thrones. Word of Satan: ‘Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for justice, as long as they forget eye for an eye and love the enemy… of justice.’ , ABC 12 88 68[392] , 0004
│ English │ #OSNR
Revelation and the Chosen – The Rescue UFOs. Daniel’s Prophecy – THE UFOs OF THE FINAL JUDGMENT (Video language:Spanish) /53/ https://youtu.be/N843VaxB_NA,
Day 168
«Show your true power» — Zeus challenges Gabriel. (Video language:Indonesian) /186/ https://youtu.be/BtUpN55nahM
«The Ships Arrived Before the Fire | A Science Fiction Story Inspired by Ancient Texts.
‘The following is a science fiction story and philosophical reflection set in a distant world… very similar to our own. Any resemblance to past, present, or future realities of Earth is part of the imagination.’
On a world similar to Earth, in a distant galaxy, the human society there was very much like the one on Earth; just as one mandarin resembles another, so that world resembled ours.
And so, they had a book very similar to the Bible that said:
‘Revelation 19:19: I saw the beast and the kings of the earth gathered together to confront the righteous who ride white horses…’
Their book also said:
‘2 Peter 3:7: But the heavens and the earth which now exist are reserved by the same word, kept for fire on the day of judgment and destruction of ungodly men.’
The scattered righteous read the book, read messages like that, and reasoned and asked themselves:
‘If the unjust are condemned to perish, are they not condemned by their inability to live in peace with one another?’
‘If they wage wars, is it just that they force others to fight them?’
‘If they launch atomic bombs, is it just that peaceful people must suffer the radiation?’
‘That is like being a non-smoker on a bus full of smokers, suffering because of others.’
‘How could it be possible that a righteous man would have asked people to love their enemies, if it is the enemies of the righteous who destroy the earth?’
‘That seems like an adulterated message.’
‘Doesn’t it say here that God does not love them?’
‘How would His faithful messenger say otherwise?’
Indeed, that book said:
‘Revelation 11:18: The nations were angry, and Your wrath has come, and the time to judge the dead, and to reward Your servants the prophets, the saints, and those who fear Your name, both small and great, and to destroy those who destroy the earth.’
Then they understood that, if their world was doomed, God would send ships to rescue them.
And so it happened.
But it was not in their Bible.
That was not written in their Bible.
But they were discerning; they had the intelligence to understand that the same ones who adulterated the original message also concealed something like that.
But they did not conceal everything, because God did not allow it.
God allowed clues so that the discerning would understand that, if there are chosen ones, God’s love was never universal:
‘Matthew 24:22: And unless those days were shortened, no one would be saved; but for the sake of the elect, those days will be shortened.’
«
«In Mark 3:29, the ‘sin against the Holy Spirit’ is warned as unforgivable. However, history and the practices of Rome reveal a shocking moral inversion: the truly unforgivable sin, according to their dogma, is questioning the credibility of their Bible. Meanwhile, serious crimes such as the killing of innocents have been ignored or justified under the same authority that claimed to be infallible. This post examines how this ‘unique sin’ was constructed and how the institution used it to protect its power while justifying historical injustices.
In purposes contrary to Christ is the Antichrist, if you read Isaiah 11 you will see the mission of Christ in his second life, and it is not to favor everyone but only the righteous, but the Antichrist is inclusive, despite being unjust, he wants to climb onto Noah’s Ark, despite being unjust he wants to leave Sodom with Lot… Happy are those to whom these words are not offensive. He who is not offended by this message, that one is righteous, congratulations to him: Christianity was created by the Romans, only a mind friendly to celibacy, proper of Greek and Roman leaders, enemies of the ancient Jews, could conceive a message like the one that says: ‘These are the ones who did not defile themselves with women, for they remained virgins. They follow the Lamb wherever he goes. They were purchased from among mankind and offered as firstfruits to God and to the Lamb’ in Revelation 14:4, or a message like this one which is similar: ‘For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like the angels of God in heaven,’ in Matthew 22:30, both messages sound as if they came from a Roman Catholic priest, and not from a prophet of God who seeks this blessing for himself: He who finds a wife finds what is good and receives favor from the Lord (Proverbs 18:22), Leviticus 21:14 A widow, or a divorced woman, or a woman who has been defiled, or a prostitute, he shall not marry; but he shall take as a wife a virgin from his own people.
I am not Christian; I am henotheist. I believe in one supreme God above all, and I believe that several created gods exist—some faithful, others deceivers. I only pray to the supreme God. But since I was indoctrinated from childhood in Roman Christianity, I believed in its teachings for many years. I applied those ideas even when common sense told me otherwise. For example—so to speak—I turned the other cheek to a woman who had already struck me on one. A woman who, at first, acted like a friend, but then, without justification, began treating me as if I were her enemy, with strange and contradictory behavior. Influenced by the Bible, I believed she had become an enemy because of some spell, and that what she needed was prayer to return to being the friend she had once shown herself to be (or pretended to be). But in the end, everything only got worse. As soon as I had the chance to dig deeper, I uncovered the lie and felt betrayed in my faith. I came to understand that many of those teachings did not come from the true message of justice, but from Roman Hellenism infiltrated into the Scriptures. And I confirmed I had been deceived. That’s why I now denounce Rome and its fraud. I do not fight against God, but against the slanders that have corrupted His message. Proverbs 29:27 declares that the righteous hates the wicked. However, 1 Peter 3:18 claims that the righteous died for the wicked. Who can believe that someone would die for those he hates? To believe it is to have blind faith; it is to accept incoherence. And when blind faith is preached, could it be because the wolf wants his prey not to see the deception?
Jehovah will shout like a mighty warrior: ‘I will take vengeance on My enemies!’
(Revelation 15:3 + Isaiah 42:13 + Deuteronomy 32:41 + Nahum 1:2–7)
And what about the so-called ‘love for the enemy’ that, according to some Bible verses, the Son of Jehovah supposedly preached—claiming we should imitate His Father’s perfection through universal love? (Mark 12:25–37, Psalm 110:1–6, Matthew 5:38–48)
That is a lie spread by the enemies of both Father and Son.
A false doctrine born from mixing Hellenism with sacred words.»
1 ¿Por qué las enseñanzas de Cleóbulo aparecen como evangelios en la Biblia? ¿Qué tipo de engaño es este? https://depuracion-del-mensaje.blogspot.com/2026/03/el-sabio-griego-frente-al-varon.html 2 누가 악에 대한 책임을 져야 하는가? ‘사탄’인가, 아니면 악을 행하는 사람인가? https://penademuerteya.com/2026/07/11/%eb%88%84%ea%b0%80-%ec%95%85%ec%97%90-%eb%8c%80%ed%95%9c-%ec%b1%85%ec%9e%84%ec%9d%84-%ec%a0%b8%ec%95%bc-%ed%95%98%eb%8a%94%ea%b0%80-%ec%82%ac%ed%83%84%ec%9d%b8%ea%b0%80-%ec%95%84%eb%8b%88/ 3 Planeten som ble slukt av sine to måner https://144k.xyz/2026/06/30/planeten-som-ble-slukt-av-sine-to-maner/ 4 Analizziamo l’infografica che analizza e critica il messaggio visivo e calunnioso contro i santi https://144k.xyz/2026/05/27/analizziamo-linfografica-che-analizza-e-critica-il-messaggio-visivo-e-calunnioso-contro-i-santi/ 5 Palabra de Satanás: ‘Felices los que creen cualquier cosa, porque son fáciles de guiar… al matadero.’ Con su sagacidad hará prosperar el engaño en su mano; y en su corazón se engrandecerá, y sin aviso destruirá a muchos… https://144k.xyz/2026/05/02/palabra-de-satanas-felices-los-que-creen-cualquier-cosa-porque-son-faciles-de-guiar-al-matadero-con-su-sagacidad-hara-prosperar-el-engano-en-su-mano-y-en-su-corazon-se/
«Truth versus Dogma: The Trap of Dogma.
The word dogma comes from the Greek δόγμα (dógma), which means approximately: ‘that which has been decided,’ ‘decree,’ ‘established opinion,’ or ‘that which must be accepted.’It does not mean truth.
What is a dogma, really, and why can it become a trap for critical thinking?In this video, we reflect on the impact of dogmas on personal and social life through a story of introspection, maturity, and the search for truth beyond imposed beliefs.
When I was just over twenty years old, I found myself trapped between the manipulation of a woman… and a religious message that I believed was genuine.She would say to me: ‘I don’t know what’s wrong with me… I don’t know why I treat you so badly… Don’t stop looking for me, even if I insult you. Save me!’Meanwhile, the dogma kept telling me: ‘Pray for her. Follow our instructions. Only then can she be delivered from evil.’
Years passed before I realized that message was not the truth, but part of a dogma.And a dogma does not cease to be a dogma just because millions believe it.
Then I understood something even more important: no dogma protects the righteous.Dogmas protect the unrighteous because they convince the righteous to endure what was never their duty or their salvation… and what was never just or necessary to endure.
Today I am over fifty years old.And if I speak about my past, it is to seek justice, so that other righteous people will not be deceived by dogma as I was.
Matthew 12: The Attempt to Use Isaiah 42 as Propaganda:
Dogma tells us that Jesus performed miracles and instructed people to remain silent ‘that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by Isaiah the prophet’ (Matthew 12), that is, so that Isaiah 42 would be fulfilled in him.But Isaiah 42 does not speak only of discretion; it speaks of justice being established on the earth.
‘By means of the truth he will bring forth justice.’
‘He will not grow faint nor be discouraged until he has established justice in the earth.’
Then the question becomes inevitable:
Does justice reign on the earth?
No.
Reality refutes the dogma.Matthew 12 uses Isaiah 42 as a religious seal, but the justice that Isaiah proclaims has not been fulfilled.The text is used as propaganda, not as verified truth.
Truth versus Deception: Daniel 8:25 vs. Isaiah 42:
Daniel 8:25 describes with surgical precision how dogma operates:
‘Through his cunning he shall cause deceit to prosper in his hand; he shall magnify himself in his heart, and without warning he shall destroy many…’
Cunning, deception, silent destruction, manipulation that confuses even the righteous.That is the mechanism of dogma: it prospers through deception, not through truth.
In contrast, Isaiah 42 describes how truth operates:
‘By means of the truth he will bring forth justice.’
Truth brings justice, establishes it, upholds it, and defends it.Truth sets the righteous free from the deception denounced in Daniel 8:25.
Isaiah 42 has not been fulfilled; Daniel 8:25 has.Reality is on the side of the warning, not of the dogma.
Selective Justice:
Daniel 12:1: ‘At that time Michael, the great prince, shall stand up… There shall be a time of distress such as never has been… but at that time your people shall be delivered, everyone who is found written in the book.’
John 8:32: ‘And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.’
Proverbs 11:8: ‘The righteous is delivered out of trouble, and the wicked comes in his place.’
Psalm 118:20: ‘This is the gate of Jehovah; the righteous shall enter through it.’
These four passages form a selective message addressed only to the righteous, yet the Roman framework contradicts it by teaching that ‘Christ died for sinners’ (Romans 5:8), that ‘all have sinned and all are justified’ (Romans 3:23–24), that ‘God desires all people to be saved’ (1 Timothy 2:4), that the unrighteous should be forgiven (Luke 23:34), and that even the enemies of the righteous should be loved (Matthew 5:44; Proverbs 29:27; Genesis 3:15). Thus, the universalism and Hellenism introduced by Rome erase the distinction between the righteous person who may sin through deception and the unrighteous person who sins by nature, destroying the righteous message in which only the righteous are delivered, purified, protected, and admitted through the gate.
It would be unwise to assume that this infiltration affects only the books attributed to Jesus or to the saints persecuted by the Roman Empire, and not the older writings.
«
«Has Isaiah’s Prophecy About the Desolate Cities Already Been Fulfilled?
According to the Bible, Isaiah says that some people will not see:
Isaiah 6:10:
‘Make the heart of this people dull, and make their ears heavy, and blind their eyes, lest they see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and understand with their heart, and be converted, and be healed.’
Isaiah 6:11-12:
Then I said, ‘How long, Lord?’ And He answered, ‘Until the cities lie waste without inhabitant, and the houses are without people, and the land becomes utterly desolate; until the LORD has removed men far away, and the abandoned places are multiplied in the midst of the land.’
And regarding other people, Isaiah says that they must see:
Isaiah 42:6-7:
‘I, the LORD, have called you in righteousness, and will hold your hand; I will keep you and give you as a covenant to the people, as a light to the nations, to open the eyes of the blind, to bring the prisoners out of the prison, and those who dwell in darkness out of the prison house.’
The Bible also says that Jesus came to bring judgment:
John 9:39:
‘And Jesus said, ‘For judgment I have come into this world, so that those who do not see may see, and those who see may become blind.»
The contradiction presented:
If Jesus had come to fulfill the prophecies of the final judgment, then the final judgment would already have brought justice through His judgment, yet we see that justice does not prevail. Therefore, that prophecy was not fulfilled through Him, because for it to be fulfilled in someone, that person must see justice triumph:
Isaiah 42:1-4:
‘Behold My servant, whom I uphold; My chosen one, in whom My soul delights. I have put My Spirit upon Him; He will bring justice to the nations.
He will not cry out, nor raise His voice, nor cause it to be heard in the streets.
A bruised reed He will not break, and a smoldering wick He will not extinguish; He will faithfully bring forth justice.
He will not fail nor be discouraged until He has established justice on the earth; and the coastlands shall wait for His law.’
However, the Bible presents Jesus as fulfilling that prophecy:
Matthew 12:16-21:
‘And He strictly warned them not to make Him known, so that what was spoken through the prophet Isaiah might be fulfilled:
‘Behold My Servant, whom I have chosen; My Beloved, in whom My soul is well pleased. I will put My Spirit upon Him, and He shall proclaim judgment to the Gentiles.
He will not quarrel, nor cry out, nor will anyone hear His voice in the streets.
A bruised reed He will not break, and a smoldering wick He will not extinguish, until He leads judgment to victory.
And in His name the Gentiles will hope.»
Here another inconsistency arises, not only because justice does not reign on the earth, but also because the Bible repeatedly shows Jesus speaking loudly and raising His voice before crowds, as in the Sermon on the Mount:
Matthew 5:1-2:
‘And seeing the multitudes, He went up on a mountain; and after He sat down, His disciples came to Him. Then He opened His mouth and taught them, saying…’
Consider this paradox:
Matthew 5:6:
‘Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for justice, for they shall be satisfied.’
In Matthew 5:6 He blesses those who hunger and thirst for justice—that is, the righteous. But further down we read:
Matthew 5:38-39:
‘You have heard that it was said, ‘An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.’ But I tell you, do not resist an evil person. Instead, if anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also.’
Is hungering and thirsting for justice the same as wanting to receive more attacks from an evil aggressor?
Matthew 5:17 says that He came to fulfill the Law, yet the Law commands that ‘eye for eye,’ which the very same passage alters:
Matthew 5:17:
‘Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.’
Matthew 5 portrays Him as fulfilling the Law that commands the removal of evil, while at the same time portraying Him as instructing people not to resist evil:
Deuteronomy 19:19-21:
‘Then you shall do to him as he intended to do to his brother; so you shall remove the evil from among you. And those who remain shall hear and fear, and shall never again commit any such evil among you. Your eye shall not pity: life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot.’
It can be concluded that the Roman institutional structure did not preserve the original message intact, but instead intervened in the texts. That alteration is not limited only to the words attributed to Jesus, but also extends to the traditions of the scribes and to the prophets of the Old Testament.
This is not about placing the Old Testament above the New Testament, but about pointing out the evident fractures throughout the entire body of the book.
A brief piece of evidence of these internal contradictions:
On the one hand, the covenant’s command requires performing ritual cuts on one’s own body:
Genesis 17:10–11:
‘This is My covenant, which you shall keep, between Me and you and your descendants after you: Every male among you shall be circumcised. You shall circumcise the flesh of your foreskin, and it shall be the sign of the covenant between Me and you.’
On the other hand, the same law explicitly forbids making any kind of cut or mark on the skin:
Leviticus 19:28:
‘You shall not make any cuts in your flesh for the dead, nor tattoo any marks on yourselves: I am the LORD.’
If the text commands, in one book, the performance of a mandatory bodily cut as a sign of belonging, but in another forbids interventions or cuts in the flesh, the lack of internal cohesion within the editorial collection is exposed.
If Jesus did not fulfill all the prophecies attributed to Him, when will they be fulfilled? When will Isaiah 6 be fulfilled?
Do you believe that by not resisting the one who is evil they overcome the dragon?
Revelation 12:17:
‘Then the dragon became furious with the woman and went off to wage war against the rest of her offspring, those who keep the commandments of God and hold to the testimony of Jesus Christ.’
This is the traditional answer usually given to this contradiction:
‘Official theology argues that the prophecy of Isaiah 6 has a ‘dual application’ or a two-stage fulfillment. According to this interpretation, the prophecy was first partially fulfilled during the Babylonian exile, and then had a second fulfillment in the days of Jesus to explain why most of the people did not accept Him (using the blindness of Isaiah 6:10 as a divine decree). Thus, they claim that the text does not contradict itself, but rather unfolds progressively.’
Now look at how we dismiss that traditional position:
To uphold that ‘dual application,’ institutional exegesis commits a blatant act of manipulation: it cuts the text wherever it is convenient.
They use the first part of the prophecy to justify the blindness and excuse why there was no visible triumph of justice, but they deliberately ignore the conclusion of the same passage in verse 13:
Isaiah 6:13:
‘But yet a tenth shall remain in it, and it shall again be consumed; yet as a terebinth tree or as an oak, whose stump remains when it is cut down, so the holy seed shall be its stump.’
If Isaiah 6 had already been fulfilled in the past under that traditional framework:
Where is that ‘holy seed’ (zera kodesh)? Where is the real restoration of the stump that brings true justice to the earth?
A prophecy cannot be declared ‘fulfilled’ by taking only the judgment and the blindness while ignoring the requirement of the reemergence of the holy seed and the establishment of the justice promised in Isaiah 42.
If we isolate Isaiah 6:11–12 to claim that it ‘was already fulfilled’ merely through physical destruction or exile, then verse 13 is left hanging and the prophecy remains incomplete.
The exact conclusion of the chapter raises the critical point that dismantles the idea of a past or final fulfillment:
Isaiah 6:13:
‘But yet a tenth shall remain in it, and it shall again be consumed; yet as a terebinth tree or as an oak, whose stump remains when it is cut down, so the holy seed shall be its stump.’
Here lies the heart of the matter:
A cycle that does not end with desolation: The text does not say that everything ends after the devastation; it says that whatever remains will again be consumed until only a ‘stump’ remains.
The identity of the ‘holy seed’: If the blindness and devastation were the judgment upon the corrupt masses or the hardened people, then the ‘holy seed’ (zera kodesh) represents the genuine remnant, the pure root that does not succumb to corruption or to the imposed blindness.
If it is maintained that Isaiah 6 was already fully fulfilled in the past (whether in Babylon or during the Roman era):
Where was the real restoration of the stump? The later institutions (including the imperial structure that compiled and edited the texts) kept the people under spiritual blindness and subjugation, without the manifestation of the triumphant justice spoken of by Isaiah.
The dilemma of the seed: If the ‘holy seed’ were the later institutionalized religious structure, then the persistence of the moral and textual contradictions within the canonized writings would make no sense.
Therefore, when the structure of the passage is analyzed, the prophecy of Isaiah 6 cannot be regarded as an event of the past or as something that an institutional system has already brought to completion. The ‘holy seed’ points to people capable of being set free from a system that wants them on their knees. This fits with the prophecies in Daniel 12:1–7, where a holy people and freedom for that people are spoken of.
It is not merely a matter of an apparent adjustment of the prophecies to fit an imperial agenda; the evidence demonstrates how the editors of the canon used the very same prophetic texts selectively and inconsistently:
The use of Isaiah against the Law and the dietary contradiction: In Matthew 15:1–11, the Gospels quote Jesus using Isaiah to rebuke those who insisted on keeping the traditional law, concluding with the statement that ‘it is not what enters the mouth that defiles a man.’ However, the prophet Isaiah himself directly contradicts this idea: in Isaiah 65:3–5 and Isaiah 66:17, the prophet explicitly condemns those who eat pork and abominable things, making it clear that, according to the prophetic vision, even in the time of final judgment there are foods that do defile a human being.
The invention of the doctrine of the virgin birth (Isaiah 7:14–16): Both Christianity and Islam embraced the doctrine that Gabriel announced a virgin birth in fulfillment of Isaiah (Matthew 1 / Qur’an 19). But when the original text of Isaiah 7 is examined, it becomes clear that it does not announce Jesus, nor does it speak of a ‘perpetual virgin’:
The sign was given specifically to King Ahaz and was to be fulfilled immediately, before the child knew how to distinguish between good and evil.
Isaiah speaks of a young woman (almáh), not of a woman who would remain a virgin after giving birth.
The historical fulfillment occurred with Hezekiah, the faithful king in the days of Ahaz, who destroyed the bronze serpent (2 Kings 18:4–7), had God with him (Immanuel), and witnessed the defeat of Assyria prophesied by Isaiah (2 Kings 19:35–37).
The accommodative use of applying fragments out of context demonstrates that the original meaning of the text was not respected, but rather re-edited and forced in order to indoctrinate.
The Roman Distortion of Hosea 6:2 and the Chronological Mismatch
Apocalyptic prophecies and their dogmatic interpretation not only incur identity contradictions, but also break the chronology in order to conceal the true restoration of the righteous people.
We can observe this here:
Revelation 12:7–10:
‘Then there was a great war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon… And the great dragon was cast out… he was cast to the earth, and his angels were cast out with him. Therefore rejoice, O heavens, and you who dwell in them.’
Revelation 12:12, 17:
‘Woe to the inhabitants of the earth and of the sea! For the devil has come down to you with great wrath… Then the dragon was enraged with the woman, and he went to make war with the rest of her offspring, those who keep the commandments of God and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.’
The book of Revelation fragments the scene by presenting the ‘inhabitants of heaven’ as the victors on one hand, but then shows the righteous within the camp of the ‘inhabitants of the earth and the sea’ once again suffering the attack of the dragon who was supposedly already defeated once and for all, as though the righteous had not truly triumphed.
If the narrative itself states that the victors despised their lives unto death in order to overcome the dragon, this directly evokes those who preferred death rather than eating pork—such as the testimony of 2 Maccabees 7, where physical surrender took place under the certainty of inheriting eternal life.
Would they then have to return to life in order to be attacked and die once again? Would they have to return to life in order to accept a dogma created by other peoples foreign to their own, in which they are commanded to worship a man under the absurdity that he is man and at the same time God, and whom imperial tradition furthermore portrays with the same visual appearance as Zeus—the very pagan god worshiped by those who executed them? Would they rise again only to hear the aberration that eating pork no longer defiles (Matthew 15:11, 1 Corinthians 10:27), or that they must bow before a created being (Hebrews 1:6)? Would they truly have to be attacked and die once more? If they had to die again, that new existence would never be eternal life.
To be in heaven is to be with God: ‘To be in heaven’ or with God does not refer to an incorporeal physical place among the clouds, but rather to the condition of being under His protection and of God being with someone. As Psalm 118:6–7 states: ‘The LORD is with me; I will not fear. What can man do to me?’
The dead do not wage war. It is the living righteous who are with God, and being with Him does not initially exempt them from facing war against the hostile on the earth.
In order to divert this chronological line and conceal the awakening of this side, Roman theology took the prophecy of Hosea 6:2 and falsely applied it to the resurrection of Jesus after 48 hours:
Hosea 6:1–2:
‘Come, and let us return to the LORD; for He has torn us, and He will heal us; He has struck us, and He will bind us up. After two days He will give us life; on the third day He will raise us up, and we shall live before Him.’
The prophecy does not describe Jesus returning to life after a literal 48 hours, but rather the chronological scale of a collective people who reincarnate.
Under the prophetic equivalence in which one day represents one thousand years (Psalm 90:4):
After two days (after 48 hours / 2,000 years): Corresponds to the period of dispersion and ignorance that has elapsed since the beginning of this era.
The third day (the third millennium): Is the present period in which we now live, when that righteous side returns to biological life.
One of the pillars of Roman dogma is that salvation is attained solely by believing that Jesus rose from the dead. However, when this premise is compared with the prophetic texts that the Church used to support it, the figure of a resurrected and perfect Jesus collapses completely:
The heir who sins and is punished (Psalm 118): In the parable of the wicked tenants (Matthew 21:33–44), the Church attributes to Jesus the rejected stone of Psalm 118:22. Nevertheless, Psalm 118 describes a righteous man who sins, is punished by God (‘The LORD has chastened me severely, but He has not given me over to death’), and then passes through the gate of righteousness. If this referred to the resurrected Jesus descending from heaven, he could not sin, since he would already know the whole truth. By contrast, if it refers to the righteous seed who reincarnates, its initial passage through ignorance explains why it sins, is rebuked, and is later purified. If he does not return from the clouds, he himself is among that holy seed, but has no way of knowing it, because a new body retains no memories experienced in another body that has already been destroyed.
The confession of sin and the betrayal (Psalm 41): Theology claims that Jesus never sinned and knew from the beginning who would betray him. Yet Psalm 41:4, 9—forced by dogma into being a prophecy about Jesus—speaks of a righteous man who admits having sinned (‘LORD, have mercy on me; heal my soul, for I have sinned against You’) and who naively trusted the one who betrayed him (‘Even my own familiar friend, in whom I trusted, who ate my bread, has lifted up his heel against me’). Trusting a traitor never fits the narrative of an omniscient Jesus, but it does fit a righteous man reincarnated on earth.
Multiple betrayers and the myth of Judas (Psalm 109): Psalm 41 does not speak of a single betrayer, but of several enemies. Once this passage collapses as a prophecy fulfilled in Jesus, the deception that Psalm 109 was fulfilled also collapses: a fabricated dogma that invented the figure of a single traitor (Judas). The falsehood of this dogma is exposed within the contradictory accounts of the Romanized text itself—contradictions deliberately created as a strategic device to reinforce the central falsehood while diverting attention toward secondary contradictions that give it a mask of credibility. These texts present two mutually exclusive accounts of Judas’ death: one states that he hanged himself (Matthew 27:5), while the other maintains that he bought a field, fell headlong, and burst open in the middle (Acts 1:18).
Psalm 41 connects directly with Psalm 118: both point to the time of the end. The righteous sinner is not an ethereally resurrected Jesus, but rather the collective righteous who, after reincarnating and falling into deception, are forgiven and purified when they understand the imperial falsehood. By turning away from the dogma, they pass through the gates of righteousness because they are the understanding ones who inherit the earth in this third millennium.
«
«The religion I defend is named justice. █
I will find her when she finds me, and she will believe what I say.
The Roman Empire has betrayed humanity by inventing religions to subjugate it. All institutionalized religions are false. All the sacred books of those religions contain frauds. However, there are messages that make sense. And there are others, missing, that can be deduced from the legitimate messages of justice. Daniel 12:1-13 — ‘The prince who fights for justice will rise to receive God’s blessing.’ Proverbs 18:22 — ‘A wife is the blessing God gives to a man.’ Leviticus 21:14 — ‘He must marry a virgin of his own faith, for she is from his own people, who will be set free when the righteous rise.’
📚 What is an institutionalized religion? An institutionalized religion is when a spiritual belief is transformed into a formal power structure, designed to control people. It ceases to be an individual search for truth or justice and becomes a system dominated by human hierarchies, serving political, economic, or social power. What is just, true, or real no longer matters. The only thing that matters is obedience. An institutionalized religion includes: Churches, synagogues, mosques, temples. Powerful religious leaders (priests, pastors, rabbis, imams, popes, etc.). Manipulated and fraudulent ‘official’ sacred texts. Dogmas that cannot be questioned. Rules imposed on people’s personal lives. Mandatory rites and rituals in order to ‘belong.’ This is how the Roman Empire, and later other empires, used faith to subjugate people. They turned the sacred into a business. And truth into heresy. If you still believe that obeying a religion is the same as having faith, you were lied to. If you still trust their books, you trust the same people who crucified justice. It’s not God speaking in his temples. It’s Rome. And Rome never stopped speaking. Wake up. He who seeks justice needs no permission. Nor an institution.
She will find me, the virgin woman will believe me.
( – – )
This is the wheat in the Bible that destroys the Roman tares in the Bible:
Revelation 19:11
Then I saw heaven opened, and there was a white horse; and the one sitting on it was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness, he judges and makes war.
Revelation 19:19
Then I saw the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies gathered together to make war against the one sitting on the horse and against his army.
Psalm 2:2-4
‘The kings of the earth set themselves up, and the rulers took counsel together against the Lord and against his anointed, saying:
‘Let us break their bonds apart and cast away their cords from us.’
He who sits in the heavens laughs; the Lord mocks them.’
Now, some basic logic: if the horseman fights for justice, but the beast and the kings of the earth fight against this horseman, then the beast and the kings of the earth are against justice. Therefore, they represent the deception of the false religions that rule with them.
The whore of Babylon, which is the false church made by Rome, has considered herself to be ‘the wife of the Lord’s anointed,’ but the false prophets of this idol-selling and flattering word-peddling organization do not share the personal goals of the Lord’s anointed and the true saints, because the ungodly leaders have chosen for themselves the path of idolatry, celibacy, or sacramentalizing unholy marriages in exchange for money. Their religious headquarters are full of idols, including false holy books, before which they bow down:
Isaiah 2:8-11
8 Their land is full of idols; they bow down to the work of their hands, to what their fingers have made.
9 So the man is humbled, and the man is brought low; do not forgive them.
10 Go into the rock, hide yourself in the dust from the terror of the LORD and from the splendor of his majesty.
11 The arrogance of human eyes will be brought low, and the pride of men will be humbled; the LORD alone will be exalted on that day.
Proverbs 19:14
House and wealth are an inheritance from fathers, but a prudent wife is from the LORD.
Leviticus 21:14
The priest of the LORD shall not marry a widow, nor a divorced woman, nor an unclean woman, nor a harlot; he shall take a virgin from his own people as a wife.
Revelation 1:6
And he has made us kings and priests to his God and Father; to him be glory and dominion forever.
1 Corinthians 11:7
The woman is the glory of man.
What does it mean in Revelation that the beast and the kings of the earth wage war on the rider of the white horse and his army?
The meaning is clear, the world leaders are hand in glove with the false prophets who are disseminators of the false religions that are dominant among the kingdoms of the earth, for obvious reasons, that includes Christianity, Islam, etc. These rulers are against justice and truth, which are the values defended by the rider of the white horse and his army loyal to God. As is evident, the deception is part of the false sacred books that these accomplices defend with the label of ‘Authorized Books of Authorized Religions’, but the only religion that I defend is justice, I defend the right of the righteous not to be deceived with religious deceptions.
Revelation 19:19 Then I saw the beast and the kings of the earth and their armies gathered together to make war against the rider on the horse and against his army.
Now some basic logic, if the horseman stands for justice, but the beast and the kings of the earth fight against this horseman, then the beast and the kings of the earth are against justice, therefore they stand for the deception of the false religions that rule with them.
This is my story:
José, a young man raised in Catholic teachings, experienced a series of events marked by complex relationships and manipulations. At 19, he began a relationship with Monica, a possessive and jealous woman. Although Jose felt that he should end the relationship, his religious upbringing led him to try to change her with love. However, Monica’s jealousy intensified, especially towards Sandra, a classmate who was making advances on Jose.
Sandra began harassing him in 1995 with anonymous phone calls, in which she made noises with the keyboard and hung up.
On one of those occasions, she revealed that she was the one calling, after Jose angrily asked in the last call: ‘Who are you?’ Sandra called him immediately, but in that call she said: ‘Jose, who am I?’ Jose, recognizing her voice, said to her: ‘You are Sandra,’ to which she replied: ‘You already know who I am.’ Jose avoided confronting her. During that time, Monica, obsessed with Sandra, threatened Jose with harming Sandra, which led Jose to protect Sandra and prolong his relationship with Monica, despite his desire to end it.
Finally, in 1996, Jose broke up with Monica and decided to approach Sandra, who had initially shown interest in him. When Jose tried to talk to her about his feelings, Sandra did not allow him to explain himself, she treated him with offensive words and he did not understand the reason. Jose chose to distance himself, but in 1997 he believed he had the opportunity to talk to Sandra, hoping that she would explain her change of attitude and be able to share the feelings that she had kept silent. On her birthday in July, he called her as he had promised a year earlier when they were still friends—something he couldn’t do in 1996 because he was with Monica. At the time, he used to believe that promises should never be broken (Matthew 5:34-37), though now he understands that some promises and oaths can be reconsidered if made in error or if the person no longer deserves them. As he finished greeting her and was about to hang up, Sandra desperately pleaded, ‘Wait, wait, can we meet?’ That made him think she had reconsidered and would finally explain her change in attitude, allowing him to share the feelings he had kept silent. However, Sandra never gave him clear answers, maintaining the intrigue with evasive and counterproductive attitudes.
Faced with this attitude, Jose decided not to look for her anymore. It was then that constant telephone harassment began. The calls followed the same pattern as in 1995 and this time were directed to the house of his paternal grandmother, where Jose lived. He was convinced that it was Sandra, since Jose had recently given Sandra his number. These calls were constant, morning, afternoon, night, and early morning, and lasted for months. When a family member answered, they did not hang up, but when José answered, the clicking of the keys could be heard before hanging up.
Jose asked his aunt, the owner of the telephone line, to request a record of incoming calls from the telephone company. He planned to use that information as evidence to contact Sandra’s family and express his concern about what she was trying to achieve with this behavior. However, his aunt downplayed his argument and refused to help. Strangely, no one in the house, neither his aunt nor his paternal grandmother, seemed to be outraged by the fact that the calls also occurred in the early morning, and they did not bother to look into how to stop them or identify the person responsible.
This had the strange appearance of orchestrated torture. Even when José asked his aunt to unplug the phone at night so he could sleep, she refused, arguing that one of her sons, who lived in Italy, could call at any moment (considering the six-hour time difference between the two countries). What made things even stranger was Monica’s fixation on Sandra, even though they hadn’t even met. Monica didn’t attend the high school where José and Sandra were enrolled, but she began to feel jealous of Sandra after finding a folder with one of José’s group projects. The folder listed the names of two women, including Sandra, but for some strange reason, Monica became fixated only on Sandra’s name.
Although José initially ignored Sandra’s phone calls, over time he relented and contacted Sandra again, influenced by biblical teachings that advised praying for those who persecuted him. However, Sandra manipulated him emotionally, alternating between insults and requests for him to keep looking for her. After months of this cycle, Jose discovered that it was all a trap. Sandra falsely accused him of sexual harassment, and as if that wasn’t bad enough, Sandra sent some criminals to beat up Jose.
That Tuesday, without José knowing it, Sandra had already set a trap for him.
Days before, José had told his friend Johan about the situation he was going through with Sandra. Johan also suspected that Sandra’s strange behavior might be due to some kind of witchcraft by Mónica. That Tuesday, José visited his old neighborhood where he had lived in 1995 and happened to run into Johan. After hearing more details about the situation, Johan recommended that José forget about Sandra and instead go out to a nightclub to meet women—perhaps he would find someone who could make him forget her. José thought it was a good idea.
So they got on a bus and headed toward the nightclub in downtown Lima. Coincidentally, the route of that bus passed near the IDAT institute. Just one block before reaching IDAT, José suddenly had the idea to get off for a moment to pay for a Saturday course he had enrolled in. He had managed to save some money for it by selling his computer and working for a week in a warehouse. However, he had been forced to quit because they exploited workers with 16-hour shifts while officially recording only 12, and if they refused to complete the week, they were threatened with not being paid at all.
So José turned to Johan and said, ‘I study here on Saturdays. Since we’re passing by, let’s get off for a bit, I’ll pay for my course, and then we’ll head to the nightclub.’
The moment José stepped off the bus, before even crossing the avenue, he was shocked to see Sandra standing right there on the corner of the institute. In disbelief, he told Johan, ‘Johan, I can’t believe it—Sandra is right there. She’s the girl I told you about, the one who acts so strangely. Wait for me here; I’m going to ask if she got the letter where I warned her about Mónica’s threats against her, and maybe she can finally explain what’s going on with her and what she wants from me with all her calls.’
Johan stayed back as José approached. But as soon as he started speaking—’Sandra, did you see the letters? Can you finally explain to me what’s going on with you?’—Sandra, without saying a word, gestured with her hand, signaling three thugs who had been hiding in different spots: one in the middle of the avenue, another behind Sandra, and another behind José.
The one standing behind Sandra stepped forward and said, ‘So you’re the sexual harasser who’s been bothering my cousin?’
José, caught off guard, responded, ‘What? Me, a harasser? On the contrary, she’s the one harassing me! If you read the letter, you’d see it’s about me trying to understand why she keeps calling me!’
Before he could react, one of the thugs grabbed him by the neck from behind and threw him to the ground. Then, together with the one who had claimed to be Sandra’s cousin, they started kicking him. Meanwhile, the third thug went through his pockets, robbing him. It was three against one—José, lying helpless on the pavement.
Luckily, his friend Johan jumped into the fight, managing to give José a chance to get up. But then the third thug picked up some rocks and started throwing them at both José and Johan.
The attack only stopped when a traffic officer intervened. The officer turned to Sandra and said, ‘If he’s harassing you, then file a complaint.’
Sandra, visibly nervous, quickly left, knowing full well that her accusation was false.
José, though deeply betrayed, did not go to the police. He had no way to prove the months of harassment he had suffered from Sandra. But beyond the shock of her betrayal, one question haunted him:
‘How did she already have this ambush set up when I never come to this place on Tuesday nights? I only come here to study on Saturday mornings.’
This made José suspect that Sandra wasn’t just an ordinary person—she might be a witch with some kind of supernatural power.
These events left a deep mark on Jose, who seeks justice and to expose those who manipulated him. In addition, he seeks to derail the advice in the Bible, such as: pray for those who insult you, because by following that advice, he fell into Sandra’s trap.
Jose’s testimony.
I am José Carlos Galindo Hinostroza, the author of the blog: https://gabriels.work
I was born in Peru, that photo is mine, it is from 1997, I was 22 years old.
At that time, I was entangled in the intrigues of Sandra Elizabeth, a former classmate from the IDAT institute. I was confused about what was happening to her (She harassed me in a very complex and extensive way to narrate in this image, but I narrate it at the bottom of this blog: and in this video:
). I did not rule out the possibility that Mónica Nieves, my ex-girlfriend, had done some witchcraft to her.
When searching for answers in the Bible, I read in Matthew 5:
‘ Pray for whoever insults you,’
And in those days, Sandra insulted me while telling me she didn’t know what was happening to her, that she wanted to continue being my friend, and that I should keep calling and looking for her again and again, and it went on like this for five months. In short, Sandra pretended to be possessed by something to keep me confused. The lies in the Bible made me believe that good people can behave evilly because of an evil spirit. That’s why the advice to pray for her didn’t seem so crazy to me—because before, Sandra pretended to be a friend, and I fell for her deception.
Thieves often use the strategy of pretending to have good intentions: To steal from stores, they pretend to be customers; to ask for tithes, they pretend to preach the word of God, but they preach that of Rome, etc., etc. Sandra Elizabeth pretended to be a friend, then pretended to be a friend in trouble looking for my help, but all to slander me and ambush me with three criminals, surely out of spite because a year earlier I rejected her advances since I was in love with Monica Nieves, to whom I was faithful. But Monica did not trust my fidelity and threatened to kill Sandra Elizabeth, which is why I broke up with Monica slowly, over eight months, so that Monica wouldn’t think it was because of Sandra. But this is how Sandra Elizabeth paid me back—with slander. She falsely accused me of sexually harassing her, and with that pretext, she ordered three criminals to beat me up—all in front of her.
I narrate all this in my blog and in my YouTube videos:
I do not wish for other righteous men to have bad experiences like I had, which is why I have created what you are reading. I know this will irritate unrighteous people like Sandra, but the truth is like the true gospel—it only favors the righteous.
The evil of José’s family overshadows Sandra’s evil:
José suffered a devastating betrayal by his own family, who not only refused to help him stop Sandra’s harassment but also falsely accused him of having a mental illness. His own relatives used these accusations as a pretext to kidnap and torture him, sending him twice to mental health institutions and a third time to a hospital.
It all began when José read Exodus 20:5 and stopped being Catholic. From that moment on, he became outraged by the Church’s dogmas and started protesting against its doctrines on his own. He also advised his relatives to stop praying to images and told them that he was praying for a friend (Sandra) who was apparently bewitched or possessed. José was under stress due to the harassment, but his relatives did not tolerate him exercising his freedom of religious expression. As a result, they destroyed his professional life, his health, and his reputation by locking him up in mental institutions where he was given sedatives.
Not only was he forcibly institutionalized, but after his release, he was forced to continue taking psychiatric medication under the threat of being locked up again. He fought to break free from those chains, and during the last two years of that injustice, with his programming career ruined, he was forced to work without pay at his uncle’s restaurant. That same uncle betrayed his trust by secretly drugging his meals with psychiatric pills. José only discovered the truth in 2007 thanks to a kitchen assistant named Lidia, who warned him about what was happening.
From 1998 to 2007, José lost nearly ten years of his youth due to his treacherous relatives. In hindsight, he realized that his mistake was defending the Bible to reject Catholicism, as his family never allowed him to read it. They committed this injustice knowing he had no financial resources to defend himself. When he finally broke free from the forced medication, he thought he had earned their respect. His maternal uncles and cousins even offered him a job, but years later, they betrayed him again with such hostility that he was forced to resign. This made him realize that he should never have forgiven them, as their bad intentions were clear.
From that moment on, he decided to study the Bible again, and in 2017, he began noticing its contradictions. Little by little, he understood why God had allowed his relatives to prevent him from defending the Bible in his youth. He discovered biblical inconsistencies and started exposing them in his blogs, where he also recounted the story of his faith and the suffering he endured at the hands of Sandra and, most of all, his own family.
For this reason, in December 2018, his mother attempted to kidnap him again with the help of corrupt police officers and a psychiatrist who issued a false certificate. They accused him of being a ‘dangerous schizophrenic’ to have him institutionalized again, but the attempt failed because he was not home. There were witnesses to the incident, and José had audio recordings, which he presented as evidence to the Peruvian authorities in his complaint, but it was dismissed.
His family knew perfectly well that he was not insane—he had a stable job, a child, and the mother of his child to take care of. However, despite knowing the truth, they attempted to kidnap him again using the same old false accusation. His own mother and other fanatical Catholic relatives led the attempt. Although his complaint was ignored by the Ministry, José exposes these truths in his blogs, making it clear that the evil of his family eclipses even that of Sandra.
Here is the evidence of the kidnappings using the slander of traitors:
‘This man is a schizophrenic who urgently needs psychiatric treatment and pills for life.’
I have been a computer programmer, I like logic, in Turbo Pascal I created a program capable of producing basic algebra formulas at random, similar to the formula below. In the following document in .PDF you can download the code of the program, this is proof that I’m not stupid, that’s why the conclusions of my research should be taken seriously. https://ntiend.me/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/math21.pdf
If U+12=02 then U=-10 «Cupid is condemned to hell along with the other pagan gods (The fallen angels for their rebellion against justice, sent to eternal punishment). █
Quoting these passages does not mean defending the entire Bible. If 1 John 5:19 says that “the whole world is under the power of the evil one,” but rulers swear on the Bible, then the Devil rules with them. If the Devil rules with them, then fraud also rules with them. Therefore, the Bible contains part of that fraud, camouflaged among truths. By connecting those truths, we can expose their deceptions. Righteous people need to know these truths so that, if they have been deceived by lies added to the Bible or other similar books, they can free themselves from them.
Daniel 12:7 And I heard the man clothed in linen, who was above the waters of the river, when he raised his right hand and his left hand to heaven and swore by Him who lives forever that it shall be for a time, times, and half a time. And when the power of the holy people is completely shattered, all these things shall be finished.
Considering that ‘Devil’ means ‘Slanderer,’ it is natural to expect that the Roman persecutors, being the adversaries of the saints, later bore false witness against the saints and their messages. Thus, they themselves are the Devil, and not an intangible entity that enters and exits people, as they made us believe precisely with passages like Luke 22:3 (“Then Satan entered Judas…”), Mark 5:12-13 (the demons entering the pigs), and John 13:27 (“After the morsel, Satan entered him”).
This is my purpose: to help righteous people not waste their power believing in the lies of impostors who have adulterated the original message, which never asked anyone to kneel before anything or pray to anything that had ever been visible.
It is no coincidence that in this image, promoted by the Roman Church, Cupid appears alongside other pagan gods. They have given the names of the true saints to these false gods, but look at how these men dress and how they wear their long hair. All this goes against faithfulness to God’s laws because it is a sign of rebellion, a sign of the fallen angels (Deuteronomy 22:5).
The serpent, the devil, or Satan (the slanderer) in hell (Isaiah 66:24, Mark 9:44). Matthew 25:41: “Then he will also say to those on his left: ‘Depart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire that has been prepared for the devil and his angels’.” Hell: the eternal fire prepared for the serpent and his angels (Revelation 12:7-12), for having combined truths with heresies in the Bible, the Quran, the Torah, and for having created false forbidden gospels that they called apocryphal, to give credibility to lies in the false sacred books, all in rebellion against justice.
Book of Enoch 95:6: “Woe to you, false witnesses and to those who weigh the price of injustice, for you will perish suddenly!” Book of Enoch 95:7: “Woe to you, unjust ones who persecute the righteous, for you yourselves will be handed over and persecuted because of that injustice, and the burden of your guilt will fall upon you!” Proverbs 11:8: “The righteous is delivered from trouble, and the wicked comes in his place.” Proverbs 16:4: “The Lord has made all things for Himself, even the wicked for the day of doom.”
Book of Enoch 94:10: “Unjust ones, I say to you that He who created you will overthrow you; upon your ruin, God will have no mercy, but rather, God will rejoice in your destruction.” Satan and his angels in hell: the second death. They deserve it for lying against Christ and His faithful disciples, accusing them of being the authors of Rome’s blasphemies in the Bible, such as love for the devil (the enemy).
Isaiah 66:24: “And they shall go out and look upon the corpses of the men who have rebelled against me; for their worm shall never die, nor shall their fire be quenched, and they shall be abhorrent to all flesh.” Mark 9:44: “Where their worm does not die, and the fire is never quenched.” Revelation 20:14: “Then Death and Hades were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death: the lake of fire.”
The false prophet: ‘The statue eats nothing, but the false prophet feasts daily on your devotion.’
When the false prophet gets someone to bow before his idol —whether a statue, figure, or image— he takes control of that person and forces them to recognize his authority. In reality, that person is bowing to the false prophet projected onto the idol that was used to put them on their knees.
Word of Satan: ‘I am the way, the truth, and the life… but when I die, life will die with me, and then no one will remain alive.’
The just reason and express their thoughts. And that is enough to shake empires based on inconsistencies.
Word of Satan: ‘Forget revenge, for the wicked always win… And remember: every justice you demand in this life is a sin; and every evil you accept by offering your other cheek, a virtue for the next life… in which I will tell you the same.’
The Bible in all languages, is it salvation or a trap? Rome fabricated and imposed false texts so that the beaten people would not demand justice or what was stolen from them. Luke 6:29: the robber’s doctrine disguised as the word of God.
Word of Satan: ‘Blessed are the intelligent men who do not read my scriptures… because they will not see the contradictions.’
When the sheep are already saved, the wolves devour each other.
The false prophet claims that God forgives every injustice, except questioning his dogmas.
In modern war, as in the Coliseum, those who die did not choose to fight.
La planète dévorée par ses deux Lunes https://ntiend.me/2026/06/28/la-planete-devoree-par-ses-deux-lunes/
Gemini e ChatGPT debatem sobre a pena de morte. https://144k.xyz/2026/05/05/gemini-e-chatgpt-debatem-sobre-a-pena-de-morte/
It’s deeper than it seems. Don’t blame the plaster. Blame those who seat it on thrones. Word of Satan: ‘Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for justice, as long as they forget eye for an eye and love the enemy… of justice.'»
«The false prophet: ‘Without statues, I am nothing. Without lies, I don’t exist’. Something that deserves discussion. The false prophet makes concessions to avoid losing followers; the true prophet does not yield a single letter of justice.
1st: They Label You a Sinner | 2nd: They Sell You Baptism | 3rd: They Keep You Sinning and Paying //52
Trees Without the Sun? The Contradiction in Genesis 1 //351
My religion is justice. //76
Truth versus Dogma: The Trap of Dogma //779
Deuteronomy 4:15 ‘Take care, for your own sake, since you did not see any form on the day that Yahweh spoke to you at Horeb out of the midst of the fire, lest you corrupt yourselves by making a carved image for yourselves in the form of any figure, the likeness of male or female, the likeness of any animal that is on the earth, the likeness of any winged bird that flies in the air, the likeness of anything that creeps on the ground, the likeness of any fish that is in the water under the earth. And beware lest you raise your eyes to heaven, and when you see the sun, the moon, and the stars, all the host of heaven, you be drawn away and bow down to them and serve them, things that the LORD your God has allotted to all the peoples under the whole heaven.’ People used to pray to gods, but when they pray to a created thing, they treat a creature as a god. That is why the followers of false prophets pray to images, statues, and other created entities. The true God never wanted to be identified with a creature so that people would pray to that creature—a pretext for praying to God by praying to that creature. Those who do this are like saying to statues or images, ‘Save us, because you are our gods.’ Isaiah 42:17 ‘They will be turned back and utterly ashamed, those who trust in idols and say to metal-plated images: You are our gods.’ //110
Word of the serpent: ‘Did God really say, ‘Do not eat that fruit’ (Genesis 3:1), nor the flesh of the pig (Deuteronomy 14:8)?… Roman scribe, pass off as the word of God:… nothing that God made is bad, if it is received with thanksgiving (1 Timothy 4:1–6).’ Word of Satan: ‘Servant of my empire, write also: ‘The whole world lies under the power of the evil one’ (1 John 5:19), and so that they submit to me, add: ‘Let every person be subject to the governing authorities; for there is no authority except from God’ (Romans 13:1)… for God has placed me so that I may never be overthrown (Revelation 13:5).’ Word of Satan: ‘Roman, now write that Jesus rose from the dead and that His return will be from the clouds, so that people wait for an impossible justice while I perpetuate myself with your empire in power, and love for their enemy is preached so that they do not demand back their gold when we steal it from them.’ //60
«
GABRIELS.WORK 