A pastor caught in a crime is not a fallen pastor, but a wolf unmasked. If you think about it, it makes sense. Word of Satan: ‘Why wives, if my males love me more than anyone? Bowed and obedient, that is the only glory I know’.
These are the things I said in 1998 to the kidnapper with the title of psychiatrist, who, like a bought judge, unjustly ruled that I should be confined and drugged at the Pinel clinic in 1998, and then again in 2001: ‘What kind of psychiatrist are you, who locks up mentally healthy people? How much were you paid to falsely accuse me and have me kidnapped? Why do you ask me ‘how are you?’ Do you not see that I am in a straitjacket? What did you expect me to answer: ‘I am very well and quite comfortable’?’ When I was 22 years old and read Exodus 20:5 for the first time, I understood that I had been deceived by the Catholic Church. However, I had not yet read enough of the Bible to understand something crucial: that defending the Bible as a whole in order to protest against idolatry was also a mistake, because it implied defending other falsehoods with which Rome had surrounded that truth. One year later, religious fanatics in my family environment did not tolerate that I called idolatry the Catholic practices they carried out, against which I protested indignantly, since I had also been indoctrinated to practice them from childhood and felt betrayed; that intolerance turned into religious persecution against me, the result of which was the captivity I suffered in a mental institution for weeks as if I were insane. //104
An idol of wood with the face of Zeus. It is claimed that Rome altered the original message. Does God need a telephone? That supposed telephone… is a carved wooden log. Why do you speak to it? Its eyes do not see you. Its mouth will never speak to you. It has no feelings, yet you tell it yours. It was part of a tree. Do you pray to something that needed to be watered by the rain? It has ears, but it does not hear you. If a dove soils it, it cannot clean itself. Why do you ask it to cleanse your sins? Is it not rather a sin to make an idol out of a log? Isaiah 44:16: ‘Part of the wood he burns in the fire; with part of it he eats meat, he roasts a roast… 17 and with the rest he makes a god, his idol; he bows down before it, worships it, and prays to it, saying: ‘Deliver me, for you are my god.’ 19 He does not reflect within himself, he has no sense or understanding to say: … ‘Shall I bow down before a block of wood?’ 20 … His deceived heart turns him aside, so that he cannot deliver his soul, nor say: ‘Is there not a lie in my right hand?» Psalm 135:15: ‘The idols of the nations… 16 They have mouths, but they do not speak.’ Habakkuk 2:18: ‘What profit is the carved image? the molded image that teaches lies, that the maker of its form should trust in it, to make mute idols? 19 Woe to him who says to the wood, ‘Awake!’ to the silent stone, ‘Arise! Shall it teach?» If one of those nations that spoke to deaf and mute statues determined which texts go into the Bible and which do not, can all the content of the Bible be trusted?’ //68
Ayudando al pensamiento crítico a sacudirse de dogmas impuestos desde la niñez. Soy creador del blog: https://ntiend.me (https://gabriels.work).
Este blog no solo está en español y tiene como propósito respetar la inteligencia frente al dogma.
Este blog no fue creado para defender la Biblia ni para buscarle una interpretación alternativa, porque eso sería darle crédito como un bloque coherente de mensajes. Los textos allí atribuidos a los santos contienen contradicciones demasiado numerosas para etiquetarlas como simples accidentes o diferencias de interpretación. Mientras se atribuye a los santos mensajes tanto de amor como de odio hacia sus enemigos, aquí hay gato encerrado. La cuestión no es cómo interpretar la Biblia o sus enigmas, sino saber hasta dónde llegan las raíces del engaño: si los mensajes están adulterados, no tiene sentido perder el tiempo intentando descifrar enigmas bíblicos posiblemente adulterados por la mano que mató a los santos y se apoderó de sus escritos para arrogarse la autoridad moral de determinar qué escritura, original o escrita por esa mano asesina, debía considerarse “la verdad” y cuál no.
//
Helping critical thinking shake off the dogmas imposed since childhood. I am the creator of the blog: https://ntiend.me (https://gabriels.work).
This blog is not only in Spanish and is intended to respect intelligence in the face of dogma.
This blog was not created to defend the Bible or to seek an alternative interpretation of it, because that would give it credit as a coherent body of messages. The texts attributed there to the saints contain far too many contradictions to dismiss them as mere accidents or differences in interpretation. While the saints are attributed with messages expressing both love and hatred toward their enemies, there is something fishy going on here. The question is not how to interpret the Bible or its enigmas, but rather how deep the roots of the deception go: if the messages have been adulterated, there is no point wasting time trying to decipher biblical enigmas possibly adulterated by the hand that killed the saints and seized their writings in order to arrogate to itself the moral authority to determine which writing, original or written by that murderous hand, was to be considered “the truth” and which was not.
Ver todas las entradas de José Carlos Galindo Hinostroza
GABRIELS.WORK 