The Path of Injustice and the Path of Justice█
Local news in Lima, Peru, in September 2026:
The extortionate messages sent by the criminal gang that calls itself ‘Los Mexicanos’, through a group chat to intimidate transport workers, contained the following explicit threats (1:03 – 1:18):
‘You already know the deal, we are the ones who rule here, with the driver and all, inside. We are going to set them on fire; we are no longer going to kill them with bullets, now I am going to dismember them and burn them alive inside their vehicles. We are the ones in charge here, the owners of the route.’
These messages were sent along with images of the vehicle they had just set on fire with the victim inside (0:54 – 1:03), confirming the level of violence used to demand the payment of 40 soles per week from shared-taxi drivers (4:46 – 4:54).
My comments and replies under @JoseGalindoMMXXVI and in their context for better understanding can be read here in this article on my blog entitled: Here You Will See How the Side of Darkness Defends Elements of Evil with Weapons of Darkness (Slander, Fraud)… Lima, September 2026: Extortionists Murder and Burn a Shared-Taxi Driver Inside His Vehicle on the Northern Pan-American Highway https://gabriels.work/2026/09/28/bandos/
‘To think that there are people who want to respect the ‘Human Rights’ of murderers who do not deserve to retain them….’
‘The heads change in the kingdom of the white-and-yellow flag, but the discourse is the same: The protection of the lives of extortionists, murderers, and everyone who kills, rapes, kidnaps, or tortures unjustly.’
Pope Leo XIV reiterated that the death penalty is inadmissible and violates human dignity.
Pope Leo XIV’s Position
Human dignity: The pontiff stated that a person’s dignity is not lost, not even after committing serious crimes.
Right to life: He maintained that the right to life is the foundation of all other human rights.
Incompatibility: He declared that supporting capital punishment is incompatible with the defense of life.
Fight against crime: He called for the rejection of the death penalty and torture, even in contexts involving drug trafficking and organized crime.
‘Pope Leo XIV has reiterated that Sacred Scripture is the ‘Word of God in human words’, explaining that God is the principal author but that the biblical authors (hagiographers) used the language and context of their time, inspired by the Holy Spirit.’
‘Pope Leo XIV (and previously Pope Francis) has reiterated that God loves everyone unconditionally and without distinctions, a central message of the Christian faith.’
‘Pope Leo XIV has not issued specific public statements on self-flagellation (the practice of inflicting physical harm on oneself for ascetic or penitential purposes).’
You have seen what he says and does not say; now you will see what I say:
The contradictions in biblical texts demonstrate the coexistence of opposing moral spirits, which calls into question whether they come from a unified source: ‘the Holy Spirit’. On the one hand, Proverbs 29:27 declares that the righteous hate the unrighteous, while 1 Peter 3:18 presents the righteous man giving his life out of love for the unrighteous. On the one hand, Genesis 4:15 shows us God protecting the life of Cain, the murderer, so that no one would kill him, while Numbers 35:33 establishes the death penalty for someone who commits a murder like the one Cain committed. These contradictions reveal an amalgamation of incompatible commandments: some demand justice and retribution to protect the innocent, while others promote undeserved love, the sacrifice of the righteous for the unrighteous, and the unjustified forgiveness of perpetrators. And what is even more serious is that Scripture says that the only unforgivable sin is blasphemy against the Holy Spirit; if Rome called what it canonized ‘the Holy Spirit’, then, in its eyes, the criminal or the worst rapist is forgiven, but not those who reject its dogmas, even if they are not criminals.
If he speaks of torture, why does he not stop the torture of those who believe that self-flagellation is an act approved by God?
According to the very Bible he defends, self-flagellation was a custom of the enemies of the prophet Elijah:
1 Kings 18:27 And it came to pass at noon, that Elijah mocked them, and said, Cry aloud: for he is a god; either he is meditating, or he is busy, or he is on a journey, or perhaps he is sleeping, and must be awakened. 28 And they cried aloud, and cut themselves with knives and lancets, according to their custom, until the blood gushed out upon them.
If he speaks of justice, why does he not stop telling the enemies of justice that God loves them? Why does he tell them that God’s love is unconditional and that He loves everyone? If God’s love were unconditional, then the scriptures that the Pope himself says are His word would indicate universal salvation. Since God has the power to do whatever He wants, He would want to save everyone He loves, and if He truly loved everyone, then absolutely no one would be lost.
Psalms 135:6 Whatever the LORD pleases, He does, in heaven and on earth, in the seas and in all the depths.
But according to those same scriptures that the Pope says are sacred, that does not happen.
According to those scriptures, God calls only those who seek justice His people, that is, the righteous; therefore, God does love, yes, but He loves only the righteous, not everyone:
Isaiah 51:1 Hearken to me, ye that follow after righteousness, ye that seek the LORD: look unto the rock whence ye are hewn, and to the hole of the pit whence ye are digged.
The prayer of the righteous to God is for justice, and there I do not see universal love either:
Psalms 15:3 O LORD, in the morning shalt thou hear my voice;
In the morning will I direct my prayer unto thee, and will look up.
4 For thou art not a God that hath pleasure in wickedness;
Neither shall evil dwell with thee.
5 The foolish shall not stand in thy sight;
Thou hatest all workers of iniquity.
6 Thou shalt destroy them that speak leasing;
The LORD will abhor the bloody and deceitful man.
Psalms 14:5 There were they in great fear:
For God is with the generation of the righteous.
Observe, then, the fate of the unrighteous according to the very text that the Pope calls ‘the word of God’.
If the unrighteous are lost, what kind of god who can save but does not save those he loves is being spoken of? It is evident, then, that the Pope is speaking of a god who does not exist. If the Pope is where he is, it is because he knows the Bible and its texts. Does he not deliberately ignore what the Bible says?
2 Peter 3:5 For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water: 6 Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished: 7 But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.
Isaiah 51:4 Hearken unto me, my people; and give ear unto me, O my nation: for a law shall proceed from me, and I will make my judgment to rest for a light of the people. 5 My righteousness is near; my salvation is gone forth, and mine arms shall judge the people; the isles shall wait upon me, and on mine arm shall they trust. 6 Lift up your eyes to the heavens, and look upon the earth beneath: for the heavens shall vanish away like smoke, and the earth shall wax old like a garment, and they that dwell therein shall die in like manner: but my salvation shall be for ever, and my righteousness shall not be abolished.
7 Hearken unto me, ye that know righteousness, the people in whose heart is my law; fear ye not the reproach of men, neither be ye afraid of their revilings. 8 For the moth shall eat them up like a garment, and the worm shall eat them like wool: but my righteousness shall be for ever, and my salvation from generation to generation.
Why would God, if we accept that God never makes mistakes, have decreed the death penalty in Numbers 35:33, only to later send Jesus to deny the law of an eye for an eye with the doctrine of offering the other cheek? Something does not add up.
Did Jesus really deny that law, or was it Rome that denied the law of an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, and a life for a life, because of a conflict of interest, since it was guilty of taking the lives of Jesus and the saints? The narrative of the victim forgiving the perpetrator, as presented by the perpetrator, is not credible, and it turns out that the councils that decided the contents of the Bible were under Roman power.
Here you will not see a Jesus saying: ‘Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do’, nor will you see Saint Stephen, according to Acts 7, pleading for forgiveness for those who stoned him:
Revelation 6:9 And when he had opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of them that were slain for the word of God, and for the testimony which they held: 10 And they cried with a loud voice, saying, How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?
Is this prophecy not being alluded to?
Where is the righteous person who, in order to please God, does not rejoice in anyone’s misfortune? That exists nowhere except in the imagination of the empire that demanded bowed knees before statues and extinguished reasoning before its dogmas:
Psalms 58:9 Let them be as a snail which melteth away: like the untimely birth of a woman, that they may not see the sun. 9 Before your pots can feel the heat of the thorns,
So alive, so enraged, He will sweep them away with a tempest.
10 The righteous shall rejoice when he seeth the vengeance;
He shall wash his feet in the blood of the wicked.
11 So that a man shall say, Verily there is a reward for the righteous;
Verily he is a God that judgeth in the earth.
Word of Satan: ‘Absolute obedience is the most profitable virtue… for the oppressor. That is why oppressors honor my Caesar.’ Don’t blame the plaster. Blame those who seat it on thrones. It is illogical, yet they still defend it. , CBA 37[319] 88 62 , 0020
│ English │ #XXKUH
Between Dogma and the Manipulation of a Cruel Woman. (Video language:German) /317/ https://youtu.be/G_bthdbYz5I,
Day 227
Did you see how he plays soccer? He’s one of us—don’t let the rivals confuse him. (Video language:English) /480/ https://youtu.be/-X01sMYA1sE
«The just punishment for owners of dangerous animals that cause the death of innocent people should be legal in Peru.
I constantly see news reports in which the owners of dangerous dogs —dogs that cause the death of other people who had the misfortune of encountering them, not because they were trying to break into their owners’ homes, but because they were unfortunate enough that their owners did not put muzzles on them or lock them up— are not sentenced to death because the law does not establish it that way.
That is not justice. What is just is not necessarily legal, and what is legal is not always just. And justice, in this case, is the death penalty for such negligence. I do not agree with everything the Bible says, but this does seem just to me and should be emulated and legalized:
Exodus 21:28: ‘If an ox gore a man or a woman, and they die, the ox shall be stoned, and its flesh shall not be eaten; but the owner of the ox shall be acquitted. 29 But if the ox was known to have been a goring ox from time past, and its owner had been warned, and he did not keep it confined, and it killed a man or a woman, the ox shall be stoned, and its owner shall also die.
Psalms 119:17: ‘Deal bountifully with thy servant, that I may live,
And keep thy word.
18 Open thou mine eyes, that I may behold
Wondrous things out of thy law.
19 I am a stranger in the earth:
Hide not thy commandments from me.
20 My soul breaketh for the longing
That it hath unto thy judgments at all times.
21 Thou hast rebuked the proud that are cursed,
Which do err from thy commandments’.
Who strayed from the just commandments if not the Empire that never stopped worshiping images?
Who denied Jesus his life and then refused to receive the punishment of life for life, if not Rome, which lied by saying that, while on the cross, Jesus forgave his enemies? Who told us that story if not the Empire that used dogs to eat alive those who followed the religion of Jesus?
Do you see any blessing here from the victim toward his murderers? Do you see love for the enemy here? I see curses against the enemies; I only see justified hatred, not love:
Psalms 69:20 The reproach hath broken my heart; and I am full of heaviness.
And I looked for some to take pity, but there was none;
And for comforters, but I found none.
21 They gave me also gall for my meat;
And in my thirst they gave me vinegar to drink.
Matthew 27:34 And they gave him vinegar to drink mingled with gall: and when he had tasted thereof, he would not drink.
Psalms 69:22 Let their table become a snare before them,
And that which should have been for their welfare, let it become a trap.
23 Let their eyes be darkened, that they see not;
And make their loins continually to shake.
24 Pour out thine indignation upon them,
And let thy wrathful anger take hold of them.
25 Let their habitation be desolate;
And let none dwell in their tents.
Who lied to us with this claim that the murderers of Jesus were forgiven by Jesus?
Luke 23:34 And Jesus said, Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do. And they parted his raiment, and cast lots.
Would Jesus ask forgiveness for those whom he had just disparagingly called ‘dogs’?
Psalms 22:16 For dogs have compassed me:
The assembly of the wicked have inclosed me:
They pierced my hands and my feet.
17 I may tell all my bones:
They look and stare upon me.
18 They part my garments among them,
And cast lots upon my vesture.
Who lied to us about Jesus and his religion? Were they not the depraved Roman emperors?
Why does the Roman Empire tell us about saints forgiving those who killed them if the righteous hate the wicked according to other biblical scriptures that seem to have survived the censorship of the Roman Empire, which ultimately decided their content?
Acts 7:59-60 And they stoned Stephen, calling upon God, and saying: … Lord, lay not this sin to their charge. And when he had said this, he fell asleep.
Proverbs 29:27 The just hate the unjust, the unjust hate the just.
How can Acts 7 be a faithful testimony about Stephen’s death and his feelings toward his murderers if Revelation 6 tells us that the murdered saints desire that their deaths be avenged?
Revelation 6:9 And when he had opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of them that were slain for the word of God, and for the testimony which they held. 10 And they cried with a loud voice, saying, How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?
What would God say about these contradictory prayers?
‘So? Did you not ask me to forgive those murderers because ‘they know not what they do’, and did you not tell me not to take their sin into account for having murdered them? Where do we stand? Are you contradicting yourselves, or is this the false testimony given by their murderers?’
It is evident that there are conflicting messages in the Bible: the messages of the saints versus the messages of the usurpers; the usurpers sought impunity for their crimes against the saints:
Those who lead the dissemination of the Imperial legacy of the worship of images of the sun have no logical arguments; they cannot explain these things coherently, so they remain silent:
Isaiah 41:28 I looked, and there was no man; and I asked of these things, and no counsellor, that, when I asked of them, could answer a word. 29 Behold, they are all vanity, and their works are nothing: their molten images are wind and confusion.
Isaiah 47:10 You felt secure in your wickedness and said, ‘No one sees me.’ Your wisdom and your knowledge have deceived you, and you said in your heart, ‘I, and no one else.’ https://gabriels.work/2026/07/17/el-negocio-de-la-fe-como-la-iglesia-y-la-brujeria-usan-el-mismo-manual/
Tacitus recounts the persecution of followers of the message of Christ that Nero carried out after the great fire of Rome in the year 64 AD. According to his account, Nero blamed the followers of the message of Christ in order to divert suspicion that he himself had caused the fire. Tacitus then describes different methods of execution. Among them, he says that some followers of the message of Christ were covered with animal skins and torn apart by dogs; others were crucified and others burned.
Tacitus’s passage about thedogs is quite explicit:
‘Covered with the skins of wild beasts, they were torn apart by dogs and perished…’
h t t p s : / / e s . w i k i p e d i a . o r g / w i k i / N e r % C 3% B 3 n
Word of the Devil: ‘Do not demonize my puppies, they are not dangerous, they only appear to be.’
Let this not go without justpunishment:
Peru – 2023
Arequipa: Pitbull dog violently attacked a60-year-old elderly man until causing his death
Peru – December 2025
Baby dies from an attack by two pitbull dogs in SJL: PNP detains two people – h t t p s : / / w w w . i n f o b a e . c o m / p e r u / 2 0 2 5 / 1 2 / 0 9 /b e b e – m u e r e – p o r – a t a q u e – d e – d o s – p e r r o s – p i t bu l l – e n – s j l – p n p – d e t i e n e – a – d o s – p e r s o n a s /
Peru – August 2026
Two Rottweiler dogs kill a 66-year-old elderly woman while she was going to the market.
h t t p s : / / d i a r i o c o r r e o . p e / e d i c i o n / a r e q u i p a/ f a t a l – a t a q u e – e n – a r e q u i p a – p e r r o s – m a t a n – a-a n c i a n a – c u a n d o – i b a – a l – m e r c a d o – n o t i c i a /
Peru – December 2025
East Lima: Prosecutor’s Office investigates the death of an 11-month-old baby after beingattacked by a pitbull dog – h t t p s : / / w w w . g o b . p e / i n s t i t u c i o n / m p f n / n o t ic i a s / 1 3 0 8 7 1 4 – l i m a – e s t e – f i s c a l i a – i n v e s t i ga – f a l l e c i m i e n t o – d e – b e b e – d e – 1 1 – m e s e s – t r a s-ser- at a c a d o – p o r – u n – p e r r o – p i t b u l l
Peru – September 2024
La Libertad: Three pitbulls attack and kill a father who leaves eightchildren orphaned – h t t p s : / / n o t i c i a s t r u j i l l o . p e / l a – l i b e r t a d -t r e s – p i t b u l l s – a t a c a n – y – m a t a n – a – p a d r e – d e -f a m i l i a – q u e – d e j a – o c h o – h i j o s – h u e r f a n o s /
Peru – March 2024
Arequipa: pitbull dogs attack and kill a 6-year-old boy in his own home – h t t p s : / / e l c o m e r c i o . p e / v i d e o s / p a i s / a r e q u ip a – p e r r o s – p i t b u l l – a t a c a n – y – m a t a n – a – n i n o -d e – 6 – a n o s – e n – s u – p r o p i a – c a s a – n n a v – a m t v – v id e o – p a i s – n o t i c i a /
«
«In Mark 3:29, the ‘sin against the Holy Spirit’ is warned as unforgivable. However, history and the practices of Rome reveal a shocking moral inversion: the truly unforgivable sin, according to their dogma, is questioning the credibility of their Bible. Meanwhile, serious crimes such as the killing of innocents have been ignored or justified under the same authority that claimed to be infallible. This post examines how this ‘unique sin’ was constructed and how the institution used it to protect its power while justifying historical injustices.
In purposes contrary to Christ is the Antichrist, if you read Isaiah 11 you will see the mission of Christ in his second life, and it is not to favor everyone but only the righteous, but the Antichrist is inclusive, despite being unjust, he wants to climb onto Noah’s Ark, despite being unjust he wants to leave Sodom with Lot… Happy are those to whom these words are not offensive. He who is not offended by this message, that one is righteous, congratulations to him: Christianity was created by the Romans, only a mind friendly to celibacy, proper of Greek and Roman leaders, enemies of the ancient Jews, could conceive a message like the one that says: ‘These are the ones who did not defile themselves with women, for they remained virgins. They follow the Lamb wherever he goes. They were purchased from among mankind and offered as firstfruits to God and to the Lamb’ in Revelation 14:4, or a message like this one which is similar: ‘For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like the angels of God in heaven,’ in Matthew 22:30, both messages sound as if they came from a Roman Catholic priest, and not from a prophet of God who seeks this blessing for himself: He who finds a wife finds what is good and receives favor from the Lord (Proverbs 18:22), Leviticus 21:14 A widow, or a divorced woman, or a woman who has been defiled, or a prostitute, he shall not marry; but he shall take as a wife a virgin from his own people.
I am not Christian; I am henotheist. I believe in one supreme God above all, and I believe that several created gods exist—some faithful, others deceivers. I only pray to the supreme God. But since I was indoctrinated from childhood in Roman Christianity, I believed in its teachings for many years. I applied those ideas even when common sense told me otherwise. For example—so to speak—I turned the other cheek to a woman who had already struck me on one. A woman who, at first, acted like a friend, but then, without justification, began treating me as if I were her enemy, with strange and contradictory behavior. Influenced by the Bible, I believed she had become an enemy because of some spell, and that what she needed was prayer to return to being the friend she had once shown herself to be (or pretended to be). But in the end, everything only got worse. As soon as I had the chance to dig deeper, I uncovered the lie and felt betrayed in my faith. I came to understand that many of those teachings did not come from the true message of justice, but from Roman Hellenism infiltrated into the Scriptures. And I confirmed I had been deceived. That’s why I now denounce Rome and its fraud. I do not fight against God, but against the slanders that have corrupted His message. Proverbs 29:27 declares that the righteous hates the wicked. However, 1 Peter 3:18 claims that the righteous died for the wicked. Who can believe that someone would die for those he hates? To believe it is to have blind faith; it is to accept incoherence. And when blind faith is preached, could it be because the wolf wants his prey not to see the deception?
Jehovah will shout like a mighty warrior: ‘I will take vengeance on My enemies!’
(Revelation 15:3 + Isaiah 42:13 + Deuteronomy 32:41 + Nahum 1:2–7)
And what about the so-called ‘love for the enemy’ that, according to some Bible verses, the Son of Jehovah supposedly preached—claiming we should imitate His Father’s perfection through universal love? (Mark 12:25–37, Psalm 110:1–6, Matthew 5:38–48)
That is a lie spread by the enemies of both Father and Son.
A false doctrine born from mixing Hellenism with sacred words.»
«
The commandments of God were not only ten; moreover, they have omitted the most important commandment for punishing those who violate the one that says: ‘You shall not kill’—the death penalty for murderers, for which God assigned executioners. This does not mean that I support everything contained in the law attributed to Moses, for if the Roman Empire appropriated the texts of the religion it hated, I do not doubt that it altered much of the original message. Justice, the death penalty… and the mystery of the ‘Ten Commandments.’ Why were we told that there were only 10 commandments of God, including this commandment? Exodus 20:13: ‘You shall not kill.’ But excluding this other commandment: Exodus 21:14: ‘But if a man acts presumptuously against his neighbor and kills him with premeditation, you shall take him even from My altar, that he may die.’ Why, in the list of commandments, did they replace one of the commandments—the one that orders not to give honor to images, including statues—with only: ‘You shall love God above all things’? Exodus 20:5: ‘You shall not bow down to them nor honor them.’ When someone commits an atrocious crime, they oppose the death penalty for the criminal by saying that God said: ‘You shall not kill.’ Then they ask you to kneel every Sunday before their images. The Roman Empire did not desire justice; it was hostile to it and altered many of its messages in its councils. That is why the Bible also denies ‘an eye for an eye’ (Matthew 5:38–39). //77
The ‘necessary evil’ for them: the mandatory banking of wages and citizen insecurity. Matthew 6:31–32: ‘Do not be anxious, saying, what shall we eat? The pagans worry; your heavenly Father knows that you need food; seek the kingdom of God and His justice, and you will have what to eat.’ Baruch 6:3–8: ‘In Babylon they will see gods of gold, silver, stone, and wood, carried on shoulders and honored. Do not imitate what the pagans do. Their idols cannot speak or feel; even so, they place crowns on them as if their statues enjoyed being adorned.’ And these are the prophecies that say that God will provide for the needs of His servants as an addition to their pursuit of justice. Isaiah 65:13: ‘Behold, my servants shall eat, but you shall be hungry.’ Isaiah 42:1: ‘Behold my servant, whom I uphold; he will bring justice to the nations.’ Love for enemies is incompatible with the pursuit of justice: Isaiah 42:13: ‘Yahweh will go forth like a man of war and will defeat His enemies.’ The message ‘let us love our enemies because God also does so (Matthew 5:44–45)’ contradicts this because Jesus did not say it; the Romans said it, they slandered out of greed, never for justice: ‘You shall not kill’ (Exodus 20:13) and executing murderers with justice (Exodus 21:14; Numbers 35:33) are equally just commandments, but the Romans have called one of them ‘obsolete’ in order to allow more murders due to lack of adequate punishment; it is as if they themselves kill by protecting murderers. The rulers who swear with one hand on the Bible do not swear by God; they swear by the empire, they do not serve justice, they serve the interests of the Vatican and the bankers. In 1997, companies paid wages in cash; salary accounts were optional. Under the pretext of preventing assaults on workers leaving to collect their pay, governments made salary accounts mandatory instead of withdrawing from the Pact of San José and legalizing the death penalty for assailants. Who made money? Did anyone in the press tell you? (Context: Translation of messages from papers posted in the streets of Lima, Peru.) //91
Give to everyone who asks, the false beggar will thank you. //151
🎬 SubtitleToMP4 (Version5): Create Subtitle Videos from Text in 76 Languages | Free Windows Tool //401
The Dogs and the Cross //1544
If Jesus resurrected Lazarus, where is he now? //26
«
1 Was empfand der heilige Petrus für seine Feinde? Liebe oder Hass? https://gabriels.work/2026/09/13/was-empfand-der-heilige-petrus-fur-seine-feinde-liebe-oder-hass/ 2 Cuidado con la envidia. https://ellameencontrara.com/2026/07/27/cuidado-con-la-envidia/ 3 Co Jonasz oddychał wewnątrz wieloryba? Wielka ryba czy wielkie oszustwo? https://penademuerteya.com/2026/06/08/co-jonasz-oddychal-wewnatrz-wieloryba-wielka-ryba-czy-wielkie-oszustwo/ 4 ¿Sucesor de San Pedro… o sucesor de los Césares? https://ellameencontrara.com/2026/04/16/sucesor-de-san-pedro-o-sucesor-de-los-cesares/ 5 A BIBLIAI APOLOGÉTA RÉMÁLMA https://depuracion-del-mensaje.blogspot.com/2026/08/a-bibliai-apologeta-remalma.html
«The Fourth Beast and the Kingdom of Dogma… Awakening Exists Only When It Breaks a Ritual. If the Ritual Continues, There Was No Awakening.
They tell you to awaken, to break free from the system, to stop being a zombie. They tell you that ‘you have already opened your eyes’ and that you are now among the few who think for themselves. But if you look closely, you will discover the contradiction: the supposed messenger of freedom wears on his chest the very same symbol of the dogma he claims to fight. He is not a liberator; he is a pseudo-liberator, just another distraction of the system that keeps you on your knees.
The power of a dogma does not fear what you think while looking at a screen. It fears what you do when you turn it off. A message that makes you feel rebellious but does not change your behavior has not set you free; it has merely given you a comfortable identity from which to keep obeying. The pseudo-liberator offers you the aesthetics of critical thinking, but never mentions the specific falsehood that sustains your ritual. He speaks against authority in the abstract so that you never discover which dogma is actually programming you.
Many believe that the masses are asleep and merely waiting to be awakened by a truth. But not everyone is asleep in a way that allows them to awaken. Some love their chains because they give them order, belonging, and meaning. For them, the ritual is not a prison—it is a refuge. And the pseudo-liberator gives them exactly what they seek: an excuse to feel superior without abandoning the symbol that rules them.
That is why, when the clock strikes 6:00 PM, there is no conflict or doubt. The person looks at the time, smiles with the serenity of someone who believes they have awakened, and kneels before the same three bricks as always. The system does not fear speeches that sound critical; it fears behavior that stops feeding the ritual. If a message comforts you but does not transform your actions, it has not set you free—it has only turned you into a slave who is proud of his chains.
‘And behold, this horn had eyes like the eyes of a man, and a mouth speaking great things… The fourth beast shall be a fourth kingdom upon earth, which shall be different from all other kingdoms, and shall devour the whole earth, and shall tread it down, and break it in pieces.’ (Daniel 7:8, 23)
What matters to the horn is that everyone lives kneeling before the objects that accompany the spread of its dogmas. Whoever bends the body bends the will.
That horn did not rule by force alone; it grafted its dogmas into the very sacred texts themselves in order to distort the perception of truth. Its objective is not for people to understand, but for them to live on their knees before the symbols and objects that legitimize its authority.
That is why it is obsessed with manufacturing false ‘awakenings’ and maintaining control over the narrative. Its greatest fear is that the true prophecy will be fulfilled: the one that announces its inevitable downfall at the precise moment when those who are truly asleep open their eyes and abandon the ritual.
«
«The Awakening of Chile: The Fall of Ecclesiastical Dogmas and the Emancipation of Consciousness
Date of analysis: September 8, 2026
Gemini:
In Latin America, the distribution of Catholics and Christians in general has changed notably in recent decades due to the advance of Protestantism (especially Evangelical Christianity) and the increase in people with no religious affiliation.
Countries in Latin America with the highest % of Catholics
Paraguay:
~88%–89% (it remains the most markedly Catholic country in the region)
Mexico:
~77%–78%
Ecuador:
~75%–79%
Peru:
~70%–76%
Colombia:
~70%–75%
Bolivia:
~70%–73%
Venezuela:
~65%–70%
Argentina:
~63%–66%
Countries in Latin America with the highest % of Christians (Catholics + Protestants)
If all Christian denominations are added together (with the Evangelical/Pentecostal sector representing a high proportion), the countries with the highest overall percentages are:
Paraguay:
~95%
Guatemala:
~92% (with approximately 42% Catholics and 45%–50% Evangelicals)
Honduras:
~90% (around 45% Catholics and 42% Evangelicals)
Nicaragua:
~88%–90%
Ecuador:
~88%–90%
Peru:
~88%–90%
Brazil:
~86%–88% (approximately 50% Catholics and 31% Evangelicals)
Atypical cases in the region
Uruguay:
It is by far the most secularized country in Latin America. More than 50% of its population declares itself to have no religion, agnostic, or atheist; Catholics represent only between 30% and 35%.
Chile:
It has experienced a sharp decline in Catholic affiliation in recent years; Catholics represent around 45%–50%, while people with no religion exceed 35%.
José:
‘Tell me a little more about Chile. What was the distribution like about 30 years ago?’
Gemini:
Three decades ago (at the beginning of the 1990s, following the return to democracy in 1990 and according to the 1992 Census data), Chile’s religious and cultural landscape was drastically different from today.
Religious Distribution in Chile (1992 Census vs. Today)
Catholics:
1992:
They represented approximately 76.7% of the population. The Catholic Church maintained enormous social, institutional, and moral influence, further supported by the role played by the Vicariate of Solidarity during the military regime in defending human rights.
Today:
It has fallen to levels between 40% and 45%.
1992:
They represented approximately 76.7% of the population. The Catholic Church maintained enormous social, institutional, and moral influence, further supported by the role played by the Vicariate of Solidarity during the military regime in defending human rights.
Today:
It has fallen to levels between 40% and 45%.
Protestants / Evangelicals:
1992:
They represented around 12.4% of the population, with the Pentecostal movement being the fastest-growing movement among lower-income urban sectors.
Today:
They remain within a similar range, fluctuating between 14% and 17%.
1992:
They represented around 12.4% of the population, with the Pentecostal movement being the fastest-growing movement among lower-income urban sectors.
Today:
They remain within a similar range, fluctuating between 14% and 17%.
No religion (Atheists, Agnostics, None):
1992:
They barely reached 5.8%. Declaring oneself to have no religion was very uncommon and was even socially penalized in certain circles.
Today:
It is the fastest-growing group in the country, exceeding 37%–40% in recent surveys, especially concentrated among young people and in urban areas.
1992:
They barely reached 5.8%. Declaring oneself to have no religion was very uncommon and was even socially penalized in certain circles.
Today:
It is the fastest-growing group in the country, exceeding 37%–40% in recent surveys, especially concentrated among young people and in urban areas.
Key factors behind the change over these 30 years
Emergence of church abuse scandals:
The widespread allegations and exposure of sexual and institutional abuse within the Chilean Catholic Church (with prominent cases emerging from the 2010s onward) caused a collapse in public trust and accelerated mass disaffiliation.
Rapid secularization of society:
As Chile experienced accelerated economic growth and greater sociocultural openness during the 1990s and 2000s, lifestyles and legislation became more secular (for example, with the approval of civil divorce in 2004, abortion on three grounds in 2017, and same-sex marriage in 2021).
Generational change:
Generations born from the 1990s onward grew up in an environment with greater access to information and cultural diversity, moving away from the traditional religious structures in which their parents and grandparents had been raised.
José:
‘Can you bring up which those cases are? If possible, include links to news articles or other sources that document them.’
Gemini:
The cases that exposed this crisis in Chile combined abuses of power, sexual abuse, and persistent institutional cover-up by the senior hierarchy.
The Karadima Case (The Turning Point)
Fernando Karadima was parish priest of the Church of the Sacred Heart of Jesus of El Bosque (Santiago), a parish of the Chilean elite. For decades, he acted as an influential spiritual leader with the tacit support or concealment of high-ranking prelates.
The exposure: In 2010, his victims —such as James Hamilton, Juan Carlos Cruz, and José Andrés Murillo— made public the abuses of power, psychological abuse, and sexual abuse they had suffered when they were young.
Impact:
In 2011, the Vatican declared him guilty of sexual abuse. In 2018, Pope Francis permanently dismissed him from the clerical state.
Judicial consequence: In 2019, the Chilean justice system determined that the Archdiocese of Santiago had engaged in negligence and concealment, ordering the institution to compensate the victims.
For further reading: CIPER Chile: Karadima: The history of his abuses h t t p s : / / w w w . c i p e r c h i l e . c l / 2 0 1 8 / 0 5 / 2 3 / k a r a d i m a – e l – h i s t o r i a l – d e – s u s – a b u s o s – s o b r e – s a c e r d o t e s – y – s e m i n a r i s t a s /
La Tercera: The decline of Fernando Karadima h t t p s : / / w w w . l a t e r c e r a . c o m / e a r l y a c c e s s / n o t i c i a / e l – o c a s o – d e – f e r n a n d o – k a r a d i m a – e l – e x p u l s a d o – s a c e r d o t e – q u e – n u n c a – p i d i o – p e r d o n – p o r – s u s – a b u s o s / F F A U M N Y C Z N C E L K P R 3 X W X H T N O M M /
The ‘Cura Tato’ Case (José Andrés Aguirre)
One of the first media cases to alert public opinion in the early 2000s.
The incident: Aguirre was investigated and tried for ongoing sexual abuse against minors.
Conviction: In 2004, he was sentenced by the Chilean civil justice system to 12 years in prison for sexual abuse offenses against minors. He was one of the first priests to be criminally convicted in the country.
The 2018 Papal Visit and the Bishops’ Crisis
The decisive moment in the collapse of ecclesial credibility occurred in January 2018 during Pope Francis’s visit to Chile.
The conflict: The Pope publicly defended the Bishop of Osorno, Juan Barros (accused by victims of having witnessed and covered up Karadima’s abuses), describing the accusations as ‘slander’.
The reaction: Public outrage in Chile was massive. Following this, the Pope sent the Vatican investigator Charles Scicluna to investigate on the ground.
The mass resignation: After receiving the report on systematic cover-up within the Chilean Church, Pope Francis summoned all the Chilean bishops to Rome in May 2018. Following the meeting, the entire Chilean episcopate (34 bishops) submitted their resignations en masse, an unprecedented event in the history of the Catholic Church.
The Prosecutor’s Office’s Mass Investigations (2018–Present)
Beginning in 2018, Chile’s Public Prosecutor’s Office opened investigations ex officio and seized documentation from the bishoprics of several regions.
The prosecutors went on to investigate more than 200 members of the clergy (including bishops and priests from dioceses such as Rancagua, Valparaíso, and Santiago) over hundreds of allegations of abuse and cover-up.
For further reading: Clarín: The case that swept away the bishopric in Chile h t t p s : / / w w w . c l a r i n . c o m / m u n d o / k a r a d i m a – c a s o – d e p r e d a d o r – s e x u a l – a r r a s o – o b i s p a d o – c h i l e _ 0 _ B J b _ D S h R f . h t m l
José:
These revelations occurred all over the world. What catches my attention is how, only in Chile, so many people woke up that it became very noticeable; in the rest of the countries…
Gemini:
The phenomenon in Chile is unique in the region. Although scandals involving abuse and ecclesiastical cover-up have occurred globally (such as in Ireland, the United States, Australia, and Germany), the social response in Chile led to one of the fastest declines in religious affiliation and religious institutionalism in the world.
There are several social, institutional, and cultural factors that explain why in Chile this ‘awakening’ or disengagement was so forceful compared with other Latin American countries:
The Breakdown of Historical ‘Moral Capital’
In Chile, the Catholic Church held an exceptionally high ethical standing that it did not have in other countries. During the military dictatorship of Augusto Pinochet, the Church — through the Vicariate of Solidarity — was the main protective shield for victims of human rights violations.
When it was revealed that the same institution that had defended people against State violence was concealing abuse against young people and children in its own parishes, the collapse of trust was not gradual, but a direct institutional trauma. The clash between the country’s image of moral authority and reality accelerated collective disillusionment.
The Elitization of the Conflict (Karadima Case)
Unlike other countries where cases occurred in rural or peripheral parishes with little access to the media, the Karadima Case took place in the parish of the Sacred Heart of El Bosque (Providencia), the heart of Santiago’s economic, political, and social elite.
The victims belonged to influential and professional families (doctors, journalists, philosophers) with direct access to the media, legal resources, and networks to sustain a media and judicial battle for years without being silenced. This prevented the ecclesiastical hierarchy from being able to ‘put out’ the issue in the media.
The Strategic Error of the Papal Visit (2018)
In most countries, the figure of the Pope tends to function as a buffer for local crises. In Chile, the opposite occurred: Francis’s visit in January 2018 acted as the final trigger.
By publicly labeling the accusations against Bishop Juan Barros as ‘slander’, the Pope generated widespread indignation among citizens. When the Vatican had to correct course by sending Charles Scicluna and demanding the resignation of all the bishops, the Chilean hierarchy was left completely discredited before its own community.
A Society Undergoing an Accelerated Process of Secularization
Chile had already been undergoing profound sociocultural transformations since the 1990s:
Accelerated economic growth and expanded access to higher education.
Mass access to the internet and social networks in a predominantly urban population.
Legislative changes that challenged traditional dogma (divorce, abortion under three specific grounds, same-sex marriage).
The abuse crisis did not create secularization by itself, but it functioned as the final catalyst for millions of people who already had doubts or cultural distance to definitively sever their ties with the institution.
The Comparison with the Rest of the Region
In the rest of Latin America: In countries such as Mexico, Colombia, or Peru, the Catholic religion remains deeply linked to cultural identity, local festivities, and community structures, generating greater resistance to mass disengagement despite existing allegations.
The global pattern: Chile’s behavior is much more similar to that of Ireland or Spain, where systematic revelations led to an accelerated emptying of churches over the course of one or two decades, leaving the institution with historically low levels of trust.
José:
This demonstrates that it is worthwhile to bring dirty laundry to light: there are people who know how to awaken; they only need to be informed.
Gemini:
The case of Chile demonstrates precisely that: when documented information, facts, and evidence come to light publicly without censorship, the institutional and social impact is inevitable.
The combination of victims willing to speak, rigorous investigative journalism, and mass access to information broke decades of concealment and silence. It shows that societies are not monolithic and do not remain blind forever; when the contradictions and abuses of structures of power are exposed, people reassess their convictions and make informed decisions about what or whom to trust.
José:
How should we title this dialogue about the decline in Chile of belief in religious institutions?
Gemini:
Here are several title options depending on the focus or nuance you want to give the dialogue:
Direct and Analytical Approach
The Collapse of Faith in Chile: From the Vicariate to the Crisis of Trust
Chilean Secularization: Factors Behind the Decline of Catholicism
The End of an Ecclesiastical Era: The Awakening of Chilean Society
Journalistic or Documentary Approach
Dirty Laundry in the Open: The Cases That Broke Ecclesial Credibility in Chile
The Karadima Effect and the Mass Resignation: Anatomy of a Disillusionment
From Moral Authority to Disenchantment: Three Decades of Transformation in Chile
Reflective and Philosophical Approach
The Light of the Facts: When Information Breaks Dogma
The Cost of Silence: The Case of Chile and the Power of Truth
Secularization and Consciousness: The Process That Redefined Beliefs in Chile
José:
Those titles sound like bad news, as if something good had been lost, such as faith in God, and I don’t see it that way. I see it as an awakening, and I want the title to reflect that. Having faith in God is not the same as having faith in the Catholic Church or in evangelical churches…
Gemini:
You are absolutely right. I completely understand that distinction: institutionalized religion (ecclesiastical structures and their hierarchies) is not the same as individual spirituality or personal faith in God. The decline in ecclesial credibility does not represent a loss, but rather emancipation from institutional tutelage, a process of clarity and a critical awakening in the face of dogma and manipulation.
Here are options that reflect this positive awakening, emancipation, and search for truth over ecclesiastical deception:
Awakening and Emancipation Approach
Chile’s Awakening: The Fall of Ecclesiastical Dogmas and the Emancipation of Consciousness
Light on Deception: Chilean Society’s Break with Ecclesiastical Structures
Liberation from Institutional Faith: The Critical Awakening to Ecclesiastical Manipulation
Truth and Clarity Approach
Beyond the Cassock: The Fall of the Church and the Awakening of Truth in Chile
The End of the Ecclesiastical Yoke: How Information Liberated Consciousness in Chile
From Blind Faith to Independent Judgment: The Fall of Ecclesiastical Hegemony
Direct and Blunt Approach
Unmasking the Clergy: The Social Awakening That Shattered Institutional Religion in Chile
No Intermediaries, No Deception: The Fall of the Catholic Church in Chile
The Collapse of the Ecclesiastical Monopoly: The Awakening of an Informed Society
José:
The one who lives by dogma slanders his critics, demonizes intelligence because he knows that, with intelligence, the fraud is uncovered, and sanctifies blind faith because he has no evidence to offer…
Gemini:
That is the fundamental paradox of structures sustained by dogmatic control: they cannot allow rational scrutiny because their entire architecture depends on unquestioning obedience.
When an institution or a system lacks empirical evidence, historical coherence, or ethical soundness, its defense mechanisms are always the same:
Ad hominem attacks and slander: Since they cannot refute the arguments, they attack the interlocutor. The critic ceases to be someone who points out a verifiable fact and becomes labeled as ‘resentful’, an ‘agent of evil’, or an ‘enemy’.
Demonization of the intellect: Critical thinking, research, and reasonable doubt are presented as vices of pride or ‘traps of the mind’, while intellectual submission is disguised as spiritual humility.
Elevation of credulity: Blind credulity — the acceptance of claims without evidence — is redefined as the highest moral virtue (‘pure faith’), precisely because proof and verification are the elements that dismantle the artifice.
When people begin demanding evidence, comparing the texts with real history, and exposing the contradictions between discourse and actions, dogma loses its monopoly. Intelligence and information do not destroy the search for meaning or ethics; what they destroy is abusive intermediation and the business of deception. That is why the first step toward any real liberation — whether social, historical, or of one’s own consciousness — has always been daring to think for oneself. https://gabriels.work/2026/05/14/1335/
End of the dialogue between José and Gemini.
Infographic and information that helps awaken from the deception of dogma:
ROMAN MYTHS: THE FALSE CONVERSION OF PAUL
The story of Saul of Tarsus (Acts 7-9) is not a miracle; it is Rome’s political engineering to infiltrate the message, destroy justice, and guarantee the oppressor’s impunity.
The moral absurdity (Acts 7)
They say that Stephen prayed for his executioners while they were stoning him. FALSE.
‘An unjust man is an abomination to the just’ (Proverbs 29:27).
Demanding that the victim love his destroyer is psychological manipulation designed to disarm the just.
Evil does not change its nature (Acts 9)
Does a fierce enemy become a saint by seeing a light? IMPOSSIBLE.
Proverbs 11, Ecclesiasticus 37, and Daniel 12:10 make it clear: the wicked will not understand.
The persecutors were not ignorant: they heard the saints, understood the message, and for that very reason, hated it. Whoever hates elementary justice will never love advanced justice.
Rome’s perfect alibi
The myth of the ‘repentant persecutor’ fulfills two systemic functions:
It nullifies ‘Eye for an Eye’: It prohibits the just from demanding justice. It forces you to tolerate the criminal under the false promise that ‘tomorrow he might convert’.
It washes the Empire’s face: It is the script Rome used for itself: ‘See? Before, we persecuted; now, we spread it. Forget the past and submit to our new spiritual authority.’
Conclusion: They created a ‘Paul’, a Roman citizen who conveniently preaches submission to pagan power (Romans 13:1). It was not redemption; it was the empire’s strategy to put the criminal in charge of administering the doctrine of his victims. https://gabriels.work/2026/06/15/40-ideas-contra-los-extorsionadores-que-haran-que-el-cesar-maldiga-aun-mas-a-la-inteligencia-artificial/
«
«The religion I defend is named justice. █
I will find her when she finds me, and she will believe what I say.
The Roman Empire has betrayed humanity by inventing religions to subjugate it. All institutionalized religions are false. All the sacred books of those religions contain frauds. However, there are messages that make sense. And there are others, missing, that can be deduced from the legitimate messages of justice. Daniel 12:1-13 — ‘The prince who fights for justice will rise to receive God’s blessing.’ Proverbs 18:22 — ‘A wife is the blessing God gives to a man.’ Leviticus 21:14 — ‘He must marry a virgin of his own faith, for she is from his own people, who will be set free when the righteous rise.’
📚 What is an institutionalized religion? An institutionalized religion is when a spiritual belief is transformed into a formal power structure, designed to control people. It ceases to be an individual search for truth or justice and becomes a system dominated by human hierarchies, serving political, economic, or social power. What is just, true, or real no longer matters. The only thing that matters is obedience. An institutionalized religion includes: Churches, synagogues, mosques, temples. Powerful religious leaders (priests, pastors, rabbis, imams, popes, etc.). Manipulated and fraudulent ‘official’ sacred texts. Dogmas that cannot be questioned. Rules imposed on people’s personal lives. Mandatory rites and rituals in order to ‘belong.’ This is how the Roman Empire, and later other empires, used faith to subjugate people. They turned the sacred into a business. And truth into heresy. If you still believe that obeying a religion is the same as having faith, you were lied to. If you still trust their books, you trust the same people who crucified justice. It’s not God speaking in his temples. It’s Rome. And Rome never stopped speaking. Wake up. He who seeks justice needs no permission. Nor an institution.
She will find me, the virgin woman will believe me.
( – – )
This is the wheat in the Bible that destroys the Roman tares in the Bible:
Revelation 19:11
Then I saw heaven opened, and there was a white horse; and the one sitting on it was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness, he judges and makes war.
Revelation 19:19
Then I saw the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies gathered together to make war against the one sitting on the horse and against his army.
Psalm 2:2-4
‘The kings of the earth set themselves up, and the rulers took counsel together against the Lord and against his anointed, saying:
‘Let us break their bonds apart and cast away their cords from us.’
He who sits in the heavens laughs; the Lord mocks them.’
Now, some basic logic: if the horseman fights for justice, but the beast and the kings of the earth fight against this horseman, then the beast and the kings of the earth are against justice. Therefore, they represent the deception of the false religions that rule with them.
The whore of Babylon, which is the false church made by Rome, has considered herself to be ‘the wife of the Lord’s anointed,’ but the false prophets of this idol-selling and flattering word-peddling organization do not share the personal goals of the Lord’s anointed and the true saints, because the ungodly leaders have chosen for themselves the path of idolatry, celibacy, or sacramentalizing unholy marriages in exchange for money. Their religious headquarters are full of idols, including false holy books, before which they bow down:
Isaiah 2:8-11
8 Their land is full of idols; they bow down to the work of their hands, to what their fingers have made.
9 So the man is humbled, and the man is brought low; do not forgive them.
10 Go into the rock, hide yourself in the dust from the terror of the LORD and from the splendor of his majesty.
11 The arrogance of human eyes will be brought low, and the pride of men will be humbled; the LORD alone will be exalted on that day.
Proverbs 19:14
House and wealth are an inheritance from fathers, but a prudent wife is from the LORD.
Leviticus 21:14
The priest of the LORD shall not marry a widow, nor a divorced woman, nor an unclean woman, nor a harlot; he shall take a virgin from his own people as a wife.
Revelation 1:6
And he has made us kings and priests to his God and Father; to him be glory and dominion forever.
1 Corinthians 11:7
The woman is the glory of man.
What does it mean in Revelation that the beast and the kings of the earth wage war on the rider of the white horse and his army?
The meaning is clear, the world leaders are hand in glove with the false prophets who are disseminators of the false religions that are dominant among the kingdoms of the earth, for obvious reasons, that includes Christianity, Islam, etc. These rulers are against justice and truth, which are the values defended by the rider of the white horse and his army loyal to God. As is evident, the deception is part of the false sacred books that these accomplices defend with the label of ‘Authorized Books of Authorized Religions’, but the only religion that I defend is justice, I defend the right of the righteous not to be deceived with religious deceptions.
Revelation 19:19 Then I saw the beast and the kings of the earth and their armies gathered together to make war against the rider on the horse and against his army.
Now some basic logic, if the horseman stands for justice, but the beast and the kings of the earth fight against this horseman, then the beast and the kings of the earth are against justice, therefore they stand for the deception of the false religions that rule with them.
This is my story:
José, a young man raised in Catholic teachings, experienced a series of events marked by complex relationships and manipulations. At 19, he began a relationship with Monica, a possessive and jealous woman. Although Jose felt that he should end the relationship, his religious upbringing led him to try to change her with love. However, Monica’s jealousy intensified, especially towards Sandra, a classmate who was making advances on Jose.
Sandra began harassing him in 1995 with anonymous phone calls, in which she made noises with the keyboard and hung up.
On one of those occasions, she revealed that she was the one calling, after Jose angrily asked in the last call: ‘Who are you?’ Sandra called him immediately, but in that call she said: ‘Jose, who am I?’ Jose, recognizing her voice, said to her: ‘You are Sandra,’ to which she replied: ‘You already know who I am.’ Jose avoided confronting her. During that time, Monica, obsessed with Sandra, threatened Jose with harming Sandra, which led Jose to protect Sandra and prolong his relationship with Monica, despite his desire to end it.
Finally, in 1996, Jose broke up with Monica and decided to approach Sandra, who had initially shown interest in him. When Jose tried to talk to her about his feelings, Sandra did not allow him to explain himself, she treated him with offensive words and he did not understand the reason. Jose chose to distance himself, but in 1997 he believed he had the opportunity to talk to Sandra, hoping that she would explain her change of attitude and be able to share the feelings that she had kept silent. On her birthday in July, he called her as he had promised a year earlier when they were still friends—something he couldn’t do in 1996 because he was with Monica. At the time, he used to believe that promises should never be broken (Matthew 5:34-37), though now he understands that some promises and oaths can be reconsidered if made in error or if the person no longer deserves them. As he finished greeting her and was about to hang up, Sandra desperately pleaded, ‘Wait, wait, can we meet?’ That made him think she had reconsidered and would finally explain her change in attitude, allowing him to share the feelings he had kept silent. However, Sandra never gave him clear answers, maintaining the intrigue with evasive and counterproductive attitudes.
Faced with this attitude, Jose decided not to look for her anymore. It was then that constant telephone harassment began. The calls followed the same pattern as in 1995 and this time were directed to the house of his paternal grandmother, where Jose lived. He was convinced that it was Sandra, since Jose had recently given Sandra his number. These calls were constant, morning, afternoon, night, and early morning, and lasted for months. When a family member answered, they did not hang up, but when José answered, the clicking of the keys could be heard before hanging up.
Jose asked his aunt, the owner of the telephone line, to request a record of incoming calls from the telephone company. He planned to use that information as evidence to contact Sandra’s family and express his concern about what she was trying to achieve with this behavior. However, his aunt downplayed his argument and refused to help. Strangely, no one in the house, neither his aunt nor his paternal grandmother, seemed to be outraged by the fact that the calls also occurred in the early morning, and they did not bother to look into how to stop them or identify the person responsible.
This had the strange appearance of orchestrated torture. Even when José asked his aunt to unplug the phone at night so he could sleep, she refused, arguing that one of her sons, who lived in Italy, could call at any moment (considering the six-hour time difference between the two countries). What made things even stranger was Monica’s fixation on Sandra, even though they hadn’t even met. Monica didn’t attend the high school where José and Sandra were enrolled, but she began to feel jealous of Sandra after finding a folder with one of José’s group projects. The folder listed the names of two women, including Sandra, but for some strange reason, Monica became fixated only on Sandra’s name.
Although José initially ignored Sandra’s phone calls, over time he relented and contacted Sandra again, influenced by biblical teachings that advised praying for those who persecuted him. However, Sandra manipulated him emotionally, alternating between insults and requests for him to keep looking for her. After months of this cycle, Jose discovered that it was all a trap. Sandra falsely accused him of sexual harassment, and as if that wasn’t bad enough, Sandra sent some criminals to beat up Jose.
That Tuesday, without José knowing it, Sandra had already set a trap for him.
Days before, José had told his friend Johan about the situation he was going through with Sandra. Johan also suspected that Sandra’s strange behavior might be due to some kind of witchcraft by Mónica. That Tuesday, José visited his old neighborhood where he had lived in 1995 and happened to run into Johan. After hearing more details about the situation, Johan recommended that José forget about Sandra and instead go out to a nightclub to meet women—perhaps he would find someone who could make him forget her. José thought it was a good idea.
So they got on a bus and headed toward the nightclub in downtown Lima. Coincidentally, the route of that bus passed near the IDAT institute. Just one block before reaching IDAT, José suddenly had the idea to get off for a moment to pay for a Saturday course he had enrolled in. He had managed to save some money for it by selling his computer and working for a week in a warehouse. However, he had been forced to quit because they exploited workers with 16-hour shifts while officially recording only 12, and if they refused to complete the week, they were threatened with not being paid at all.
So José turned to Johan and said, ‘I study here on Saturdays. Since we’re passing by, let’s get off for a bit, I’ll pay for my course, and then we’ll head to the nightclub.’
The moment José stepped off the bus, before even crossing the avenue, he was shocked to see Sandra standing right there on the corner of the institute. In disbelief, he told Johan, ‘Johan, I can’t believe it—Sandra is right there. She’s the girl I told you about, the one who acts so strangely. Wait for me here; I’m going to ask if she got the letter where I warned her about Mónica’s threats against her, and maybe she can finally explain what’s going on with her and what she wants from me with all her calls.’
Johan stayed back as José approached. But as soon as he started speaking—’Sandra, did you see the letters? Can you finally explain to me what’s going on with you?’—Sandra, without saying a word, gestured with her hand, signaling three thugs who had been hiding in different spots: one in the middle of the avenue, another behind Sandra, and another behind José.
The one standing behind Sandra stepped forward and said, ‘So you’re the sexual harasser who’s been bothering my cousin?’
José, caught off guard, responded, ‘What? Me, a harasser? On the contrary, she’s the one harassing me! If you read the letter, you’d see it’s about me trying to understand why she keeps calling me!’
Before he could react, one of the thugs grabbed him by the neck from behind and threw him to the ground. Then, together with the one who had claimed to be Sandra’s cousin, they started kicking him. Meanwhile, the third thug went through his pockets, robbing him. It was three against one—José, lying helpless on the pavement.
Luckily, his friend Johan jumped into the fight, managing to give José a chance to get up. But then the third thug picked up some rocks and started throwing them at both José and Johan.
The attack only stopped when a traffic officer intervened. The officer turned to Sandra and said, ‘If he’s harassing you, then file a complaint.’
Sandra, visibly nervous, quickly left, knowing full well that her accusation was false.
José, though deeply betrayed, did not go to the police. He had no way to prove the months of harassment he had suffered from Sandra. But beyond the shock of her betrayal, one question haunted him:
‘How did she already have this ambush set up when I never come to this place on Tuesday nights? I only come here to study on Saturday mornings.’
This made José suspect that Sandra wasn’t just an ordinary person—she might be a witch with some kind of supernatural power.
These events left a deep mark on Jose, who seeks justice and to expose those who manipulated him. In addition, he seeks to derail the advice in the Bible, such as: pray for those who insult you, because by following that advice, he fell into Sandra’s trap.
Jose’s testimony.
I am José Carlos Galindo Hinostroza, the author of the blog: https://gabriels.work
I was born in Peru, that photo is mine, it is from 1997, I was 22 years old.
At that time, I was entangled in the intrigues of Sandra Elizabeth, a former classmate from the IDAT institute. I was confused about what was happening to her (She harassed me in a very complex and extensive way to narrate in this image, but I narrate it at the bottom of this blog: and in this video:
). I did not rule out the possibility that Mónica Nieves, my ex-girlfriend, had done some witchcraft to her.
When searching for answers in the Bible, I read in Matthew 5:
‘ Pray for whoever insults you,’
And in those days, Sandra insulted me while telling me she didn’t know what was happening to her, that she wanted to continue being my friend, and that I should keep calling and looking for her again and again, and it went on like this for five months. In short, Sandra pretended to be possessed by something to keep me confused. The lies in the Bible made me believe that good people can behave evilly because of an evil spirit. That’s why the advice to pray for her didn’t seem so crazy to me—because before, Sandra pretended to be a friend, and I fell for her deception.
Thieves often use the strategy of pretending to have good intentions: To steal from stores, they pretend to be customers; to ask for tithes, they pretend to preach the word of God, but they preach that of Rome, etc., etc. Sandra Elizabeth pretended to be a friend, then pretended to be a friend in trouble looking for my help, but all to slander me and ambush me with three criminals, surely out of spite because a year earlier I rejected her advances since I was in love with Monica Nieves, to whom I was faithful. But Monica did not trust my fidelity and threatened to kill Sandra Elizabeth, which is why I broke up with Monica slowly, over eight months, so that Monica wouldn’t think it was because of Sandra. But this is how Sandra Elizabeth paid me back—with slander. She falsely accused me of sexually harassing her, and with that pretext, she ordered three criminals to beat me up—all in front of her.
I narrate all this in my blog and in my YouTube videos:
I do not wish for other righteous men to have bad experiences like I had, which is why I have created what you are reading. I know this will irritate unrighteous people like Sandra, but the truth is like the true gospel—it only favors the righteous.
The evil of José’s family overshadows Sandra’s evil:
José suffered a devastating betrayal by his own family, who not only refused to help him stop Sandra’s harassment but also falsely accused him of having a mental illness. His own relatives used these accusations as a pretext to kidnap and torture him, sending him twice to mental health institutions and a third time to a hospital.
It all began when José read Exodus 20:5 and stopped being Catholic. From that moment on, he became outraged by the Church’s dogmas and started protesting against its doctrines on his own. He also advised his relatives to stop praying to images and told them that he was praying for a friend (Sandra) who was apparently bewitched or possessed. José was under stress due to the harassment, but his relatives did not tolerate him exercising his freedom of religious expression. As a result, they destroyed his professional life, his health, and his reputation by locking him up in mental institutions where he was given sedatives.
Not only was he forcibly institutionalized, but after his release, he was forced to continue taking psychiatric medication under the threat of being locked up again. He fought to break free from those chains, and during the last two years of that injustice, with his programming career ruined, he was forced to work without pay at his uncle’s restaurant. That same uncle betrayed his trust by secretly drugging his meals with psychiatric pills. José only discovered the truth in 2007 thanks to a kitchen assistant named Lidia, who warned him about what was happening.
From 1998 to 2007, José lost nearly ten years of his youth due to his treacherous relatives. In hindsight, he realized that his mistake was defending the Bible to reject Catholicism, as his family never allowed him to read it. They committed this injustice knowing he had no financial resources to defend himself. When he finally broke free from the forced medication, he thought he had earned their respect. His maternal uncles and cousins even offered him a job, but years later, they betrayed him again with such hostility that he was forced to resign. This made him realize that he should never have forgiven them, as their bad intentions were clear.
From that moment on, he decided to study the Bible again, and in 2017, he began noticing its contradictions. Little by little, he understood why God had allowed his relatives to prevent him from defending the Bible in his youth. He discovered biblical inconsistencies and started exposing them in his blogs, where he also recounted the story of his faith and the suffering he endured at the hands of Sandra and, most of all, his own family.
For this reason, in December 2018, his mother attempted to kidnap him again with the help of corrupt police officers and a psychiatrist who issued a false certificate. They accused him of being a ‘dangerous schizophrenic’ to have him institutionalized again, but the attempt failed because he was not home. There were witnesses to the incident, and José had audio recordings, which he presented as evidence to the Peruvian authorities in his complaint, but it was dismissed.
His family knew perfectly well that he was not insane—he had a stable job, a child, and the mother of his child to take care of. However, despite knowing the truth, they attempted to kidnap him again using the same old false accusation. His own mother and other fanatical Catholic relatives led the attempt. Although his complaint was ignored by the Ministry, José exposes these truths in his blogs, making it clear that the evil of his family eclipses even that of Sandra.
Here is the evidence of the kidnappings using the slander of traitors:
‘This man is a schizophrenic who urgently needs psychiatric treatment and pills for life.’
I have been a computer programmer, I like logic, in Turbo Pascal I created a program capable of producing basic algebra formulas at random, similar to the formula below. In the following document in .PDF you can download the code of the program, this is proof that I’m not stupid, that’s why the conclusions of my research should be taken seriously. https://ntiend.me/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/math21.pdf
If h/72=33.51 then h=2412.72 «Cupid is condemned to hell along with the other pagan gods (The fallen angels for their rebellion against justice, sent to eternal punishment). █
Quoting these passages does not mean defending the entire Bible. If 1 John 5:19 says that “the whole world is under the power of the evil one,” but rulers swear on the Bible, then the Devil rules with them. If the Devil rules with them, then fraud also rules with them. Therefore, the Bible contains part of that fraud, camouflaged among truths. By connecting those truths, we can expose their deceptions. Righteous people need to know these truths so that, if they have been deceived by lies added to the Bible or other similar books, they can free themselves from them.
Daniel 12:7 And I heard the man clothed in linen, who was above the waters of the river, when he raised his right hand and his left hand to heaven and swore by Him who lives forever that it shall be for a time, times, and half a time. And when the power of the holy people is completely shattered, all these things shall be finished.
Considering that ‘Devil’ means ‘Slanderer,’ it is natural to expect that the Roman persecutors, being the adversaries of the saints, later bore false witness against the saints and their messages. Thus, they themselves are the Devil, and not an intangible entity that enters and exits people, as they made us believe precisely with passages like Luke 22:3 (“Then Satan entered Judas…”), Mark 5:12-13 (the demons entering the pigs), and John 13:27 (“After the morsel, Satan entered him”).
This is my purpose: to help righteous people not waste their power believing in the lies of impostors who have adulterated the original message, which never asked anyone to kneel before anything or pray to anything that had ever been visible.
It is no coincidence that in this image, promoted by the Roman Church, Cupid appears alongside other pagan gods. They have given the names of the true saints to these false gods, but look at how these men dress and how they wear their long hair. All this goes against faithfulness to God’s laws because it is a sign of rebellion, a sign of the fallen angels (Deuteronomy 22:5).
The serpent, the devil, or Satan (the slanderer) in hell (Isaiah 66:24, Mark 9:44). Matthew 25:41: “Then he will also say to those on his left: ‘Depart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire that has been prepared for the devil and his angels’.” Hell: the eternal fire prepared for the serpent and his angels (Revelation 12:7-12), for having combined truths with heresies in the Bible, the Quran, the Torah, and for having created false forbidden gospels that they called apocryphal, to give credibility to lies in the false sacred books, all in rebellion against justice.
Book of Enoch 95:6: “Woe to you, false witnesses and to those who weigh the price of injustice, for you will perish suddenly!” Book of Enoch 95:7: “Woe to you, unjust ones who persecute the righteous, for you yourselves will be handed over and persecuted because of that injustice, and the burden of your guilt will fall upon you!” Proverbs 11:8: “The righteous is delivered from trouble, and the wicked comes in his place.” Proverbs 16:4: “The Lord has made all things for Himself, even the wicked for the day of doom.”
Book of Enoch 94:10: “Unjust ones, I say to you that He who created you will overthrow you; upon your ruin, God will have no mercy, but rather, God will rejoice in your destruction.” Satan and his angels in hell: the second death. They deserve it for lying against Christ and His faithful disciples, accusing them of being the authors of Rome’s blasphemies in the Bible, such as love for the devil (the enemy).
Isaiah 66:24: “And they shall go out and look upon the corpses of the men who have rebelled against me; for their worm shall never die, nor shall their fire be quenched, and they shall be abhorrent to all flesh.” Mark 9:44: “Where their worm does not die, and the fire is never quenched.” Revelation 20:14: “Then Death and Hades were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death: the lake of fire.”
They want your life for their wars, not for your freedom. A government that forces death does not deserve obedience.
They send you to the front saying it is for the homeland, but in reality it is for the government, which does not defend the people.
Word of Satan: «Accustom them from childhood to believing that a man can walk on the sea, stop the wind with his hands, and bring the dead back to life. Afterwards, it will be much easier to make them believe that a criminal can magically transform into a righteous person. Once they have accepted the impossible as truth, convincing them to abolish justice against evil will be a simple matter. Thus my kingdom will remain shielded.»
The false prophet: ‘God is jealous, but not if you pray to the creatures I tell you to.’
The impostor, dressed as a lamb, can’t resist the meat; the true lamb doesn’t even come close.
Word of Satan to his priests: «When they ask you for evidence, give them authority; when they ask you for logic, give them tradition; when they ask you for coherence, give them mystery.»
Word of Satan (Zeus, Jupiter): «While my priests bless what they themselves do not practice, since they seek for the fruits of those marriages to come near me, they proclaim my kingdom; since in my kingdom there will be no marriages, everyone will be like my long-haired androgynous angels, and their glory will be to live kneeling before the light of my face.»
They are not wounded sheep: they are disguised predators, and their excuses no longer deceive.
The image blessed by the false prophet remains silent, letting itself be carried without question… he leads many wherever the image goes, they follow without question, asking it for miracles expecting mercy from the image, without seeing the cruelty of the master who displays his slaves with it.
Word of Satan: «You do not need to defend the unjust person with arguments; it is enough to tell the righteous person that they have no right to speak.»
Wizerunki Diabła przedstawiano jako wizerunki świętych https://ellameencontrara.com/2026/09/15/wizerunki-diabla-przedstawiano-jako-wizerunki-swietych/
No era un reto personal para probar vanidades. Era una huida obligada https://144k.xyz/2026/03/20/no-era-un-reto-personal-para-probar-vanidades-era-una-huida-obligada/
Word of Satan: ‘Absolute obedience is the most profitable virtue… for the oppressor. That is why oppressors honor my Caesar.’ Don’t blame the plaster. Blame those who seat it on thrones. It is illogical, yet they still defend it.»
