The Path of Injustice and the Path of Justice█
Local news in Lima, Peru, in September 2026:
The extortionate messages sent by the criminal gang that calls itself ‘Los Mexicanos’, through a group chat to intimidate transport workers, contained the following explicit threats (1:03 – 1:18):
‘You already know the deal, we are the ones who rule here, with the driver and all, inside. We are going to set them on fire; we are no longer going to kill them with bullets, now I am going to dismember them and burn them alive inside their vehicles. We are the ones in charge here, the owners of the route.’
These messages were sent along with images of the vehicle they had just set on fire with the victim inside (0:54 – 1:03), confirming the level of violence used to demand the payment of 40 soles per week from shared-taxi drivers (4:46 – 4:54).
My comments and replies under @JoseGalindoMMXXVI and in their context for better understanding can be read here in this article on my blog entitled: Here You Will See How the Side of Darkness Defends Elements of Evil with Weapons of Darkness (Slander, Fraud)… Lima, September 2026: Extortionists Murder and Burn a Shared-Taxi Driver Inside His Vehicle on the Northern Pan-American Highway https://gabriels.work/2026/09/28/bandos/
‘To think that there are people who want to respect the ‘Human Rights’ of murderers who do not deserve to retain them….’
‘The heads change in the kingdom of the white-and-yellow flag, but the discourse is the same: The protection of the lives of extortionists, murderers, and everyone who kills, rapes, kidnaps, or tortures unjustly.’
Pope Leo XIV reiterated that the death penalty is inadmissible and violates human dignity.
Pope Leo XIV’s Position
Human dignity: The pontiff stated that a person’s dignity is not lost, not even after committing serious crimes.
Right to life: He maintained that the right to life is the foundation of all other human rights.
Incompatibility: He declared that supporting capital punishment is incompatible with the defense of life.
Fight against crime: He called for the rejection of the death penalty and torture, even in contexts involving drug trafficking and organized crime.
‘Pope Leo XIV has reiterated that Sacred Scripture is the ‘Word of God in human words’, explaining that God is the principal author but that the biblical authors (hagiographers) used the language and context of their time, inspired by the Holy Spirit.’
‘Pope Leo XIV (and previously Pope Francis) has reiterated that God loves everyone unconditionally and without distinctions, a central message of the Christian faith.’
‘Pope Leo XIV has not issued specific public statements on self-flagellation (the practice of inflicting physical harm on oneself for ascetic or penitential purposes).’
You have seen what he says and does not say; now you will see what I say:
The contradictions in biblical texts demonstrate the coexistence of opposing moral spirits, which calls into question whether they come from a unified source: ‘the Holy Spirit’. On the one hand, Proverbs 29:27 declares that the righteous hate the unrighteous, while 1 Peter 3:18 presents the righteous man giving his life out of love for the unrighteous. On the one hand, Genesis 4:15 shows us God protecting the life of Cain, the murderer, so that no one would kill him, while Numbers 35:33 establishes the death penalty for someone who commits a murder like the one Cain committed. These contradictions reveal an amalgamation of incompatible commandments: some demand justice and retribution to protect the innocent, while others promote undeserved love, the sacrifice of the righteous for the unrighteous, and the unjustified forgiveness of perpetrators. And what is even more serious is that Scripture says that the only unforgivable sin is blasphemy against the Holy Spirit; if Rome called what it canonized ‘the Holy Spirit’, then, in its eyes, the criminal or the worst rapist is forgiven, but not those who reject its dogmas, even if they are not criminals.
If he speaks of torture, why does he not stop the torture of those who believe that self-flagellation is an act approved by God?
According to the very Bible he defends, self-flagellation was a custom of the enemies of the prophet Elijah:
1 Kings 18:27 And it came to pass at noon, that Elijah mocked them, and said, Cry aloud: for he is a god; either he is meditating, or he is busy, or he is on a journey, or perhaps he is sleeping, and must be awakened. 28 And they cried aloud, and cut themselves with knives and lancets, according to their custom, until the blood gushed out upon them.
If he speaks of justice, why does he not stop telling the enemies of justice that God loves them? Why does he tell them that God’s love is unconditional and that He loves everyone? If God’s love were unconditional, then the scriptures that the Pope himself says are His word would indicate universal salvation. Since God has the power to do whatever He wants, He would want to save everyone He loves, and if He truly loved everyone, then absolutely no one would be lost.
Psalms 135:6 Whatever the LORD pleases, He does, in heaven and on earth, in the seas and in all the depths.
But according to those same scriptures that the Pope says are sacred, that does not happen.
According to those scriptures, God calls only those who seek justice His people, that is, the righteous; therefore, God does love, yes, but He loves only the righteous, not everyone:
Isaiah 51:1 Hearken to me, ye that follow after righteousness, ye that seek the LORD: look unto the rock whence ye are hewn, and to the hole of the pit whence ye are digged.
The prayer of the righteous to God is for justice, and there I do not see universal love either:
Psalms 15:3 O LORD, in the morning shalt thou hear my voice;
In the morning will I direct my prayer unto thee, and will look up.
4 For thou art not a God that hath pleasure in wickedness;
Neither shall evil dwell with thee.
5 The foolish shall not stand in thy sight;
Thou hatest all workers of iniquity.
6 Thou shalt destroy them that speak leasing;
The LORD will abhor the bloody and deceitful man.
Psalms 14:5 There were they in great fear:
For God is with the generation of the righteous.
Observe, then, the fate of the unrighteous according to the very text that the Pope calls ‘the word of God’.
If the unrighteous are lost, what kind of god who can save but does not save those he loves is being spoken of? It is evident, then, that the Pope is speaking of a god who does not exist. If the Pope is where he is, it is because he knows the Bible and its texts. Does he not deliberately ignore what the Bible says?
2 Peter 3:5 For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water: 6 Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished: 7 But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.
Isaiah 51:4 Hearken unto me, my people; and give ear unto me, O my nation: for a law shall proceed from me, and I will make my judgment to rest for a light of the people. 5 My righteousness is near; my salvation is gone forth, and mine arms shall judge the people; the isles shall wait upon me, and on mine arm shall they trust. 6 Lift up your eyes to the heavens, and look upon the earth beneath: for the heavens shall vanish away like smoke, and the earth shall wax old like a garment, and they that dwell therein shall die in like manner: but my salvation shall be for ever, and my righteousness shall not be abolished.
7 Hearken unto me, ye that know righteousness, the people in whose heart is my law; fear ye not the reproach of men, neither be ye afraid of their revilings. 8 For the moth shall eat them up like a garment, and the worm shall eat them like wool: but my righteousness shall be for ever, and my salvation from generation to generation.
Why would God, if we accept that God never makes mistakes, have decreed the death penalty in Numbers 35:33, only to later send Jesus to deny the law of an eye for an eye with the doctrine of offering the other cheek? Something does not add up.
Did Jesus really deny that law, or was it Rome that denied the law of an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, and a life for a life, because of a conflict of interest, since it was guilty of taking the lives of Jesus and the saints? The narrative of the victim forgiving the perpetrator, as presented by the perpetrator, is not credible, and it turns out that the councils that decided the contents of the Bible were under Roman power.
Here you will not see a Jesus saying: ‘Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do’, nor will you see Saint Stephen, according to Acts 7, pleading for forgiveness for those who stoned him:
Revelation 6:9 And when he had opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of them that were slain for the word of God, and for the testimony which they held: 10 And they cried with a loud voice, saying, How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?
Is this prophecy not being alluded to?
Where is the righteous person who, in order to please God, does not rejoice in anyone’s misfortune? That exists nowhere except in the imagination of the empire that demanded bowed knees before statues and extinguished reasoning before its dogmas:
Psalms 58:9 Let them be as a snail which melteth away: like the untimely birth of a woman, that they may not see the sun. 9 Before your pots can feel the heat of the thorns,
So alive, so enraged, He will sweep them away with a tempest.
10 The righteous shall rejoice when he seeth the vengeance;
He shall wash his feet in the blood of the wicked.
11 So that a man shall say, Verily there is a reward for the righteous;
Verily he is a God that judgeth in the earth.
