ZION: A Mountain? A Territory? Or a People? If People, What People?█
Habakkuk 2:18 What profiteth the graven image that the maker thereof hath graven it; the molten image, and a teacher of lies, that the maker of his work trusteth therein, to make dumb idols?
Isaiah 2:8-9 Their land also is full of idols, and they bow down before the work of their hands and before that which their fingers have made. And the man bows down, and the male humbles himself; therefore forgive them not.
Isaiah 57:13 When you cry out for help,
let your collection of idols save you!
The wind will carry all of them off;
a mere breath will blow them away.
Prophecy of Daniel concerning a great deception:
Daniel 8:25 He will cause deceit to prosper
through his cunning and by his influence,
and in his own mind he will exalt himself.
He will destroy many in a time of peace;
he will even stand against the Prince of princes.
Yet he will be broken—not by human hands.
Prophecy of Isaiah concerning a great deception:
Isaiah 28:14 Therefore hear the word of the Lord, you scoffers
who rule this people in Jerusalem.
(Rome ruled over Jerusalem beginning in 63 BCE, and Roman rule continued until the division of the Roman Empire into the Western and Eastern Roman Empires.)
Isaiah 28:15 You boast, “We have entered into a covenant with death,
with the realm of the dead we have made an agreement.
When an overwhelming scourge sweeps by,
it cannot touch us,
for we have made a lie our refuge
and falsehood our hiding place.”
Do not mistake me for a Bible preacher just because I have used these Bible verses to describe the message behind this video.
Just take a look and use your own logic:
John 12:31 “Now is the judgment of this world; now shall the prince of this world be cast out.”
Really? I do not see justice reigning in the world.
What I see is the reign of thieves and deception:
Revelation 13:7 “It was given power to wage war against God’s holy people and to conquer them. And it was given authority over every tribe, people, language and nation.”
If Satan is ruling the world, is it logical to think that a text full of justice and truth would be officially recognized by the kingdoms under his control?
Don’t you think Satan could have infiltrated his own deception into the very biblical texts to use them to deceive people?
Isn’t it logical to think that Satan will continue deceiving the world until he is defeated in his war against the righteous, and that his deception will be eradicated only when his defeat brings that war to an end?
Revelation 12:9 “And the great dragon was cast out—that serpent of old called the Devil and Satan, who deceiveth the whole world. He was cast out onto the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.”
How Isaiah 28, Psalm 2, Psalm 118, and Daniel 12 Connect in the Prophecy Concerning the Great Deception
Isaiah’s prophecy concerning the refuge of lies cannot be considered completely fulfilled while deception remains and the promised foundation in Zion has not been established in its ultimate sense. Isaiah 28:15 exposes the refuge of lies, while Isaiah 28:16 declares that Jehovah lays a precious cornerstone in Zion, a firm foundation.
Psalm 2:6 declares:
“Yet have I set my king upon my holy hill of Zion.”
Zion represents Jehovah’s chosen people under the rule of His appointed King. In this prophetic interpretation, the establishment of the King upon Zion is connected with the ultimate vindication of the righteous.
Psalm 118 reinforces this connection. The psalm begins by declaring the goodness of Jehovah and calling upon Israel to proclaim it:
Psalm 118:1-2: “O give thanks unto Jehovah; for he is good: because his mercy endureth for ever. Let Israel now say, that his mercy endureth for ever.”
The psalm then speaks of the gates of righteousness through which the righteous enter:
Psalm 118:19-20: “Open to me the gates of righteousness: I will go into them, and I will praise Jehovah: This gate of Jehovah, into which the righteous shall enter.”
The same psalm identifies the stone rejected by the builders as having become the headstone of the corner:
Psalm 118:22: “The stone which the builders refused is become the head stone of the corner.”
These passages establish a meaningful connection between the stone, the gates of righteousness, and the people who enter through them. The psalm begins by calling upon Israel to proclaim the goodness of Jehovah and then identifies the righteous as those who enter Jehovah’s gate. In this prophetic interpretation, the true Israel of God is constituted by the righteous, rather than being defined merely by ancestry or political identity.
The stone rejected by the builders in Psalm 118:22 connects with the precious cornerstone established in Zion in Isaiah 28:16 and with the King established upon Zion in Psalm 2:6. Together, these passages point to the establishment of Jehovah’s rule and the vindication of the righteous.
Daniel 12:1 completes this prophetic connection by describing Michael rising up at the time of the end to defend God’s people during a time of unprecedented distress. The people whom Michael defends are the righteous, who constitute the true Israel of God. Their ultimate vindication is connected with the establishment of Jehovah’s rule and the fulfillment of the prophecies concerning Zion.
Daniel 12:3 further reinforces this identification of God’s people with the righteous. It declares:
“Those who are wise shall shine like the brightness of the firmament, and those who teach the multitude the path of righteousness shall shine like the stars forever and ever.”
This verse speaks of those who lead many to righteousness and who will shine forever. Those who teach and promote righteousness stand in contrast with those who promote deception and injustice. The true Israel of God is therefore identified, in this interpretation, with the righteous, whose vindication is connected with Michael rising up at the time of the end.
The sequence is clear within this prophetic interpretation: Isaiah exposes the refuge of lies and announces the foundation in Zion; Psalm 2 declares the establishment of Jehovah’s King upon Zion; Psalm 118 identifies the righteous as those who enter Jehovah’s gate and connects the rejected stone with the cornerstone; and Daniel 12 describes Michael rising to defend the righteous at the time of the end.
The ultimate fulfillment of these prophecies is associated with the establishment of Jehovah’s rule, the vindication of the righteous, and the final eradication of deception. The refuge of lies will not stand forever, the rejected stone will occupy its appointed place, and the righteous will be defended when Michael rises at the time of the end.
This is why Isaiah’s prophecy cannot simply be dismissed as something that was completely fulfilled in his own time. The persistence of deception and injustice, together with the promised establishment of the foundation in Zion, points, in this interpretation, toward an ultimate fulfillment at the time of the end.
«Did Rome expect me, too, to blindly believe that a man whose appearance was identical to that of the Roman god Jupiter walked upon a liquid sea without sinking? Did you also expect me to believe that he stopped the winds with his hands? Now I understand why Rome blessed, in those texts they sold us as sacred, those who believe without having seen… the light of evidence. They made their god the truth, when truth is not a finite being, but information that can be verified in reality, and that information cannot be confined to a single being, because it is infinite.»
Only keen observers notice. Word of Lucifer (Satan): ‘Happy are those who do not seek joy in the kisses of a faithful wife but in being worthy to behold the light of my face.’ He who promotes idolatry does not seek truth, he seeks clients. , ACB 37 55[385] 96 , 0015
│ English │ #IUK
A Secret Message from Jesus in the Parable of the Unjust Steward? (Video language:German) /149/ https://youtu.be/CK838SsnHZw,
Day 227
Trees Without the Sun? The Contradiction in Genesis 1 (Video language:Portuguese) /354/ https://youtu.be/MSInJ6nLFLg
«The black cat that devours the dove of the undeserved peace that Caesar promotes for men of black souls
Do not confuse me with the defenders of Hellenism; I do not preach the teachings of Cleobulus of Lindos https://youtube.com/shorts/DfYvX3Uzfao Quoting passages from the Bible, the Book of Enoch, the Gospel of Philip, or the Gospel of Thomas does not mean that I believe everything that the Bible or those books say. I do not believe in loving one’s enemies, I do not believe in offering the other cheek to the aggressor, I do not believe in walking the double distance or carrying the double burden. Nor do I believe in the faithfulness of the Roman Empire, an Empire that decided which texts would enter the Bible and which would be considered canonical or supposed apocrypha, and that continued to exist under another name, while essentially preserving the same structure of power, ultimately influencing which texts would be accepted, which would be rejected, and which of those supposed apocrypha would later come to light. An Empire that imposed statues instead of justice and dogmas instead of reason. And I do not believe that a statue, which cannot even hold itself upright in the face of an earthquake, is capable of serving to obtain favors from the Supreme God, who needs no intermediaries, as if someone could say a word that He would not hear; that Supreme God who says that there is no other Supreme God, but only Him.
The successors of the leaders of the same Empire that canonized the injustice of its own lies now tell us that God loves the assailants:
‘Give to everyone who asks you, and if anyone takes away what is yours, do not ask for it back.’ Luke 6:30
Do you really believe that Luke 6:30 is a message that Rome persecuted and not one intended to protect what it stole from future claims?
Isaiah 57:19 I will create the fruit of the lips: Peace, peace to him who is far away and to him who is near, says Jehovah; and I will heal him. 20 But the wicked are like the troubled sea, which cannot rest, and its waters cast up mire and mud. 21 There is no peace, says my God, for the wicked.
Psalms 5:4 For You are not a God who takes pleasure in wickedness; the evil man will not dwell with You. 5 The foolish shall not stand in Your sight; You hate all who practice iniquity. 6 You shall destroy those who speak lies; the LORD abhors the bloody and deceitful man.
Psalms 50:16 But to the wicked God said: What right have you to speak of My laws, and to take My covenant in your mouth? 17 For you hate correction, and cast My words behind you. 18 When you saw a thief, you ran with him, and you were a companion of adulterers.
Here you are going to see that Pope Leo has stated a lie: that God loves everyone. It is the same thing Pope Francis said when he was alive. Observe for yourselves. Now, this is as false as the false message that Rome has promoted. You only need to concentrate on the meaning of the words and what those words imply. It happens that the Roman Empire did not accept the true message it persecuted, because gospel means good news, glad tidings. Therefore, the message that Rome persecuted was a selective message; it was good news, not for everyone, but for the righteous. Why? Because God has a message of justice, and justice is never good news for the unjust. The triumph of the victim over the thief who robbed him is not a triumph for the thief; it is a triumph for the victim because the victim recovers what was stolen from him. But the message adulterated by the Roman Empire says the opposite. It says, for example, that one should not demand from anyone what belongs to oneself. Did you notice? That message of not demanding what belongs to oneself is in accordance with the thief. Caesar’s dove says: ‘Peace for everyone because God loves everyone.’
Gabriel’s black cat replies: ‘The prophet Isaiah has said, ‘There is no peace for the wicked.’ There is no peace without justice and there is no justice without truth.’
If you consider yourself coherent, do not act in such a simplistic manner; do not allow yourself to be dragged along by the masses of people who repeat false religious dogmas without wanting or being able to effectively analyze the truthfulness of those religious dogmas: This is not as easy and simple as saying: ‘They contradict the Bible’, because there are many lies from ‘Babylon’ in the Bible itself; the Roman Empire has told its own version of events, and as was to be expected, its version of events is false. This is so because they spoke horrible things against God, and I will tell you what this means: The Romans did not convert to Christianity because, in fact, they created Christianity after destroying a religion that resembles none of those known to the world. Nevertheless, they took some elements from that persecuted religion, such as the passage cited (Daniel 11:36-37), as a kind of challenge to that prophecy, and the result is an endless number of contradictions in the Bible that condemn the incoherent and false prophets who defend that Roman legacy to perpetual confusion.
Daniel 11:36-37 And the king shall do according to his will, and he shall exalt himself and magnify himself above every god; and he shall speak astonishing things against the God of gods, and shall prosper until the wrath is completed; for what has been determined shall be fulfilled.
Then the God of gods said to Gabriel: ‘Announce to the sun-worshiping empire that they will have no peace, they do not deserve it; take the black cat and put an end to their undeserved peace.’
In a vast territory where peace once reigned, a ruthless emperor rose to power through blood and treachery. He had invaded and plundered countless peaceful peoples, massacring those who opposed his rule and usurping the throne that rightfully belonged to another.
Once he had consolidated his rule with iron and fire, the emperor summoned his soldiers to the great square of his capital. With an arrogant gesture, he raised his arms and proclaimed:—With the riches we have plundered and the weapons we have acquired, our peace will be guaranteed.To give weight to his declaration, he released a white dove into the air with an olive branch in its beak. His legions cheered enthusiastically, celebrating their victory with applause and cries of glory.
But then, a thunderous roar shook the sky. Thunder resounded furiously, and in an instant, a dense cloud formed over the square. A descending lightning bolt struck the ground in front of the emperor, releasing a blinding light and a white smoke that quickly dissipated. When the light faded, a figure was revealed before everyone’s astonished eyes. He was a man with short hair, dressed in an impeccable blue uniform. He wielded a shining sword in his right hand, whose brilliant light seemed to cut through reality itself. With his other hand, he held a black cat that kept its gaze fixed on the emperor.
The stranger spoke in a firm and authoritative voice:
—There will be no peace for you. You have shed too much innocent blood, and that will only bring misery upon your empire. A curse weighs upon your kingdom because of your crimes and thefts. The soldiers, witnesses to that portent, were paralyzed with fear. The emperor turned pale as he felt that his fate had been sealed.
While the dove was flying, it saw Gabriel holding the cat with his left arm and said: ‘Beware of that diabolical black cat.’
The cat replied: ‘Diabolical is wishing peace upon the wicked.’
The man then released the black cat. With a dazzling leap, the cat caught the white dove in mid-flight and devoured it without hesitation.
After its action, the feline returned to the man, who received it calmly.
A second lightning bolt struck, illuminating the scene with its spectral brilliance. In an instant, both the man and the cat disappeared, as if they had never been there. At that precise moment, the sound of trumpets resounded from all directions. A much more powerful empire had surrounded the city. Justice had arrived.
«
«In Mark 3:29, the ‘sin against the Holy Spirit’ is warned as unforgivable. However, history and the practices of Rome reveal a shocking moral inversion: the truly unforgivable sin, according to their dogma, is questioning the credibility of their Bible. Meanwhile, serious crimes such as the killing of innocents have been ignored or justified under the same authority that claimed to be infallible. This post examines how this ‘unique sin’ was constructed and how the institution used it to protect its power while justifying historical injustices.
In purposes contrary to Christ is the Antichrist, if you read Isaiah 11 you will see the mission of Christ in his second life, and it is not to favor everyone but only the righteous, but the Antichrist is inclusive, despite being unjust, he wants to climb onto Noah’s Ark, despite being unjust he wants to leave Sodom with Lot… Happy are those to whom these words are not offensive. He who is not offended by this message, that one is righteous, congratulations to him: Christianity was created by the Romans, only a mind friendly to celibacy, proper of Greek and Roman leaders, enemies of the ancient Jews, could conceive a message like the one that says: ‘These are the ones who did not defile themselves with women, for they remained virgins. They follow the Lamb wherever he goes. They were purchased from among mankind and offered as firstfruits to God and to the Lamb’ in Revelation 14:4, or a message like this one which is similar: ‘For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like the angels of God in heaven,’ in Matthew 22:30, both messages sound as if they came from a Roman Catholic priest, and not from a prophet of God who seeks this blessing for himself: He who finds a wife finds what is good and receives favor from the Lord (Proverbs 18:22), Leviticus 21:14 A widow, or a divorced woman, or a woman who has been defiled, or a prostitute, he shall not marry; but he shall take as a wife a virgin from his own people.
I am not Christian; I am henotheist. I believe in one supreme God above all, and I believe that several created gods exist—some faithful, others deceivers. I only pray to the supreme God. But since I was indoctrinated from childhood in Roman Christianity, I believed in its teachings for many years. I applied those ideas even when common sense told me otherwise. For example—so to speak—I turned the other cheek to a woman who had already struck me on one. A woman who, at first, acted like a friend, but then, without justification, began treating me as if I were her enemy, with strange and contradictory behavior. Influenced by the Bible, I believed she had become an enemy because of some spell, and that what she needed was prayer to return to being the friend she had once shown herself to be (or pretended to be). But in the end, everything only got worse. As soon as I had the chance to dig deeper, I uncovered the lie and felt betrayed in my faith. I came to understand that many of those teachings did not come from the true message of justice, but from Roman Hellenism infiltrated into the Scriptures. And I confirmed I had been deceived. That’s why I now denounce Rome and its fraud. I do not fight against God, but against the slanders that have corrupted His message. Proverbs 29:27 declares that the righteous hates the wicked. However, 1 Peter 3:18 claims that the righteous died for the wicked. Who can believe that someone would die for those he hates? To believe it is to have blind faith; it is to accept incoherence. And when blind faith is preached, could it be because the wolf wants his prey not to see the deception?
Jehovah will shout like a mighty warrior: ‘I will take vengeance on My enemies!’
(Revelation 15:3 + Isaiah 42:13 + Deuteronomy 32:41 + Nahum 1:2–7)
And what about the so-called ‘love for the enemy’ that, according to some Bible verses, the Son of Jehovah supposedly preached—claiming we should imitate His Father’s perfection through universal love? (Mark 12:25–37, Psalm 110:1–6, Matthew 5:38–48)
That is a lie spread by the enemies of both Father and Son.
A false doctrine born from mixing Hellenism with sacred words.»
«
He deceived a blind man… and did God love him? Altered message? Jacob deceived a blind man… and did God love him? Did you know that the Bible says: ‘Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated’ (Romans 9:13)? But… let us look at the facts. Jacob took advantage of his brother’s weakness to obtain the birthright (Genesis 25:29–34). Then he deceived his own father, who was blind, in order to steal the blessing (Genesis 27). Is that justice? Scripture itself condemns that kind of act: ‘Cursed is he who makes the blind wander out of the way’ (Deuteronomy 27:18). And it also says: ‘You hate all workers of iniquity’ (Psalm 5:5). So the question arises: how can God love a usurper who deceives a blind man? Can truth contradict itself? Or… could it be that the Roman Empire presented an altered message? A usurping message… like Jacob himself? If the system teaches you to respect a usurper… who really wrote this story? In Genesis 25:29–34 it is not said that Jacob deceived Esau, but that Esau sold his birthright to him. The obvious deception appears afterward, when Jacob deceives his blind father (Genesis 27). However, Esau himself interprets both events as the same usurpation in Genesis 27:36, saying: ‘Is he not rightly named Jacob? For he has supplanted me these two times: he took away my birthright, and now he has taken away my blessing.’ (Jacob means ‘heel-grabber’). Is it a coincidence that in Genesis 3:15 the serpent is described as the one who strikes the heel, and that Jacob was born grasping the heel and was called a ‘usurper’? //96
The idols. ‘Why do they ask it for protection if it cannot protect itself from me?’ Is that which others bow before somehow an exception simply because it has a different form or a different name? No one who asks people to bow before something as a sign of respect to the Supreme God, or as a means of obtaining His favor, can be called a faithful prophet of that God. //445
The Hand of God Against the Idols //243
The Emperor is arrested; his useless statue can’t save him. //599
The Hand of God and the Idols //744
What you’re doing is restoring the logic of justice to the text, contrasting it with the logic of submission. It’s understandable why this makes the system uncomfortable //365
«
1 개들과 십자가 https://ellameencontrara.com/2026/10/06/idi30crossdogs/ 2 偽りの物乞いと偽預言者は、偽りの教えによって利益を得ているのか？ https://gabriels.work/2026/07/23/idi43fpfb/ 3 যোনাহ তিমির ভেতরে কী শ্বাস নিয়েছিল? বিশাল মাছ নাকি বিশাল প্রতারণা? https://ellameencontrara.com/2026/06/09/idi26jw/ 4 Analizziamo l’infografica che analizza e critica il messaggio visivo e calunnioso contro i santi https://bestiadn.com/2026/05/27/analizziamo-linfografica-che-analizza-e-critica-il-messaggio-visivo-e-calunnioso-contro-i-santi/ 5 La bestia que yo vi… y la belleza que veré. https://144k.xyz/la-bestia-que-yo-vi-y-la-belleza-que-vere/
«The Dogs and the Cross
If I am told that the spirit of justice inspired the entire collection of texts, and I find messages that are incompatible with one another, then the explanation that ‘they are different authors’ does not solve the problem. On the contrary, it makes it worse. A text should not be considered true before it is read; it must earn that credibility through its coherence.
If you read Psalm 22 carefully, it is inevitable to think of the crucifixion. It describes a man surrounded by onlookers who mock him, telling him to let God save him, and a victim who cries out: ‘They pierced my hands and my feet.’
In fact, John 19 explicitly mentions that they divided his garments and cast lots for his clothing so that the Scripture might be fulfilled. And the Scripture being cited is precisely Psalm 22.
But there is a crucial detail that completely breaks the story we were told.
The victim in that Psalm does not show love toward his aggressors; on the contrary, he contemptuously calls them: ‘Dogs have surrounded me, a band of evildoers.’
‘But wait. If this man is Jesus—as we were told—then we cannot take only the parts of the Psalm that match the crucifixion and discard the rest. The same man who says ‘they pierced my hands and my feet’ is the one who calls his aggressors ‘dogs.’ It is the same first person. The suffering is his, the hands are his, and the words are also his.’
This does not fit the traditional image of Jesus saying on the cross: ‘Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing.’
And the pattern repeats itself. John 19 also says that they gave him vinegar to drink so that the Scripture might be fulfilled. But if you read the prophecy alluded to in Psalm 69 within its own context, you will see that the man who receives the vinegar does not ask forgiveness for those who were torturing him; on the contrary, he openly curses his enemies and asks that their table become a trap.
Then the question is inevitable: Why does the official version sell us a martyr who loves those who kill him, when the texts on which it is based show a man filled with indignation, contempt, and a cry for justice against his aggressors?
Did they pass on the real testimony to us, or a narrative modified by Rome to teach us submission?
Think about these details. Draw your own conclusions.
«
«In football, would you pass the ball to the opposing team? There is clear infiltration in the texts.
This is like football: the opponent pretends to be a teammate and tells you: ‘Here, pass me the ball’. That is an infiltrated text: it asks you to support the interests of the opposing team.
In this video, I expose an example of that infiltration.
Before, I knew nothing about these subjects, but due to circumstances in life, I began to investigate. When I looked into the meaning of the word ‘angel’, I discovered that it means ‘messenger’.
So, when I read that some angels of good fight against some angels of evil, knowing this, I interpret it as a war between messages, a war between messengers: the messengers of good defending justice and the messengers of evil defending impunity.
That is what I see.
Now, in Revelation 12:7, a war between messengers is described: Michael and his angels fighting against the dragon and his angels.
At the end, something key is mentioned: that the dragon, or Satan, the demon, or the devil, whatever you want to call the evil one, he and his angels lose.
But something else is stated emphatically. It says that they deceive the whole world.
The text says something like this: ‘And the great dragon was thrown down, the one who deceives the whole world’.
That makes me think: throughout the world there are dominant books belonging to the main religions, such as Christianity, Islam, and Judaism.
Therefore, if the devil or Satan deceives the whole world, it is logical to suppose that his deception has infiltrated what humanity considers sacred texts.
It is logical. Otherwise, he would not be deceiving the whole world.
Now there is a detail about this question of the opposing sides that I want to clarify.
It does not seem possible to me that, if Jesus belongs to the side of the good, he would have taught the good to love the side of the evil.
It makes no sense.
It would be as if Jesus said to the angel Michael: ‘Fight the dragon while loving him. Love his army. Do good to him. Turn the other cheek’.
That does not fit.
For that reason, I consider that loving the enemy is not part of the true teaching, but rather something that the enemy of the true message preached.
I think that the enemy of the authentic message sought the submission of his victims and, in accordance with that purpose, adulterated the message.
Sometimes some people try to justify this idea by saying that turning the other cheek or loving the aggressor serves to break the cycle of violence.
But that does not hold up in reality.
Evil does not stop because the victim turns the other cheek. The wicked person continues attacking the just person, regardless of whether the latter is peaceful or does not resist.
The only way in which lasting justice and peace can be achieved is through the victory of the just, and this cannot be achieved if one loves those who are the source of injustice.
The war between good and evil is a war of messages. Words have consequences, and the wicked do not want to suffer the consequences of their actions: just punishment. They prefer the rhetoric of a just person suffering unjustly for the wrongdoing of the wicked. Read Proverbs 29:27 and contrast it with 1 Peter 3:18. If the first passage says that the just person hates the wicked person—which seems obvious to me—does it make sense to you that a just person would give his life out of love for the wicked? You will see that there is a great inconsistency. I hope this makes you notice and recognize that there is clear infiltration in the texts.
«
«The religion I defend is named justice. █
I will find her when she finds me, and she will believe what I say.
The Roman Empire has betrayed humanity by inventing religions to subjugate it. All institutionalized religions are false. All the sacred books of those religions contain frauds. However, there are messages that make sense. And there are others, missing, that can be deduced from the legitimate messages of justice. Daniel 12:1-13 — ‘The prince who fights for justice will rise to receive God’s blessing.’ Proverbs 18:22 — ‘A wife is the blessing God gives to a man.’ Leviticus 21:14 — ‘He must marry a virgin of his own faith, for she is from his own people, who will be set free when the righteous rise.’
📚 What is an institutionalized religion? An institutionalized religion is when a spiritual belief is transformed into a formal power structure, designed to control people. It ceases to be an individual search for truth or justice and becomes a system dominated by human hierarchies, serving political, economic, or social power. What is just, true, or real no longer matters. The only thing that matters is obedience. An institutionalized religion includes: Churches, synagogues, mosques, temples. Powerful religious leaders (priests, pastors, rabbis, imams, popes, etc.). Manipulated and fraudulent ‘official’ sacred texts. Dogmas that cannot be questioned. Rules imposed on people’s personal lives. Mandatory rites and rituals in order to ‘belong.’ This is how the Roman Empire, and later other empires, used faith to subjugate people. They turned the sacred into a business. And truth into heresy. If you still believe that obeying a religion is the same as having faith, you were lied to. If you still trust their books, you trust the same people who crucified justice. It’s not God speaking in his temples. It’s Rome. And Rome never stopped speaking. Wake up. He who seeks justice needs no permission. Nor an institution.
She will find me, the virgin woman will believe me.
( – – )
This is the wheat in the Bible that destroys the Roman tares in the Bible:
Revelation 19:11
Then I saw heaven opened, and there was a white horse; and the one sitting on it was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness, he judges and makes war.
Revelation 19:19
Then I saw the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies gathered together to make war against the one sitting on the horse and against his army.
Psalm 2:2-4
‘The kings of the earth set themselves up, and the rulers took counsel together against the Lord and against his anointed, saying:
‘Let us break their bonds apart and cast away their cords from us.’
He who sits in the heavens laughs; the Lord mocks them.’
Now, some basic logic: if the horseman fights for justice, but the beast and the kings of the earth fight against this horseman, then the beast and the kings of the earth are against justice. Therefore, they represent the deception of the false religions that rule with them.
The whore of Babylon, which is the false church made by Rome, has considered herself to be ‘the wife of the Lord’s anointed,’ but the false prophets of this idol-selling and flattering word-peddling organization do not share the personal goals of the Lord’s anointed and the true saints, because the ungodly leaders have chosen for themselves the path of idolatry, celibacy, or sacramentalizing unholy marriages in exchange for money. Their religious headquarters are full of idols, including false holy books, before which they bow down:
Isaiah 2:8-11
8 Their land is full of idols; they bow down to the work of their hands, to what their fingers have made.
9 So the man is humbled, and the man is brought low; do not forgive them.
10 Go into the rock, hide yourself in the dust from the terror of the LORD and from the splendor of his majesty.
11 The arrogance of human eyes will be brought low, and the pride of men will be humbled; the LORD alone will be exalted on that day.
Proverbs 19:14
House and wealth are an inheritance from fathers, but a prudent wife is from the LORD.
Leviticus 21:14
The priest of the LORD shall not marry a widow, nor a divorced woman, nor an unclean woman, nor a harlot; he shall take a virgin from his own people as a wife.
Revelation 1:6
And he has made us kings and priests to his God and Father; to him be glory and dominion forever.
1 Corinthians 11:7
The woman is the glory of man.
What does it mean in Revelation that the beast and the kings of the earth wage war on the rider of the white horse and his army?
The meaning is clear, the world leaders are hand in glove with the false prophets who are disseminators of the false religions that are dominant among the kingdoms of the earth, for obvious reasons, that includes Christianity, Islam, etc. These rulers are against justice and truth, which are the values defended by the rider of the white horse and his army loyal to God. As is evident, the deception is part of the false sacred books that these accomplices defend with the label of ‘Authorized Books of Authorized Religions’, but the only religion that I defend is justice, I defend the right of the righteous not to be deceived with religious deceptions.
Revelation 19:19 Then I saw the beast and the kings of the earth and their armies gathered together to make war against the rider on the horse and against his army.
Now some basic logic, if the horseman stands for justice, but the beast and the kings of the earth fight against this horseman, then the beast and the kings of the earth are against justice, therefore they stand for the deception of the false religions that rule with them.
This is my story:
José, a young man raised in Catholic teachings, experienced a series of events marked by complex relationships and manipulations. At 19, he began a relationship with Monica, a possessive and jealous woman. Although Jose felt that he should end the relationship, his religious upbringing led him to try to change her with love. However, Monica’s jealousy intensified, especially towards Sandra, a classmate who was making advances on Jose.
Sandra began harassing him in 1995 with anonymous phone calls, in which she made noises with the keyboard and hung up.
On one of those occasions, she revealed that she was the one calling, after Jose angrily asked in the last call: ‘Who are you?’ Sandra called him immediately, but in that call she said: ‘Jose, who am I?’ Jose, recognizing her voice, said to her: ‘You are Sandra,’ to which she replied: ‘You already know who I am.’ Jose avoided confronting her. During that time, Monica, obsessed with Sandra, threatened Jose with harming Sandra, which led Jose to protect Sandra and prolong his relationship with Monica, despite his desire to end it.
Finally, in 1996, Jose broke up with Monica and decided to approach Sandra, who had initially shown interest in him. When Jose tried to talk to her about his feelings, Sandra did not allow him to explain himself, she treated him with offensive words and he did not understand the reason. Jose chose to distance himself, but in 1997 he believed he had the opportunity to talk to Sandra, hoping that she would explain her change of attitude and be able to share the feelings that she had kept silent. On her birthday in July, he called her as he had promised a year earlier when they were still friends—something he couldn’t do in 1996 because he was with Monica. At the time, he used to believe that promises should never be broken (Matthew 5:34-37), though now he understands that some promises and oaths can be reconsidered if made in error or if the person no longer deserves them. As he finished greeting her and was about to hang up, Sandra desperately pleaded, ‘Wait, wait, can we meet?’ That made him think she had reconsidered and would finally explain her change in attitude, allowing him to share the feelings he had kept silent. However, Sandra never gave him clear answers, maintaining the intrigue with evasive and counterproductive attitudes.
Faced with this attitude, Jose decided not to look for her anymore. It was then that constant telephone harassment began. The calls followed the same pattern as in 1995 and this time were directed to the house of his paternal grandmother, where Jose lived. He was convinced that it was Sandra, since Jose had recently given Sandra his number. These calls were constant, morning, afternoon, night, and early morning, and lasted for months. When a family member answered, they did not hang up, but when José answered, the clicking of the keys could be heard before hanging up.
Jose asked his aunt, the owner of the telephone line, to request a record of incoming calls from the telephone company. He planned to use that information as evidence to contact Sandra’s family and express his concern about what she was trying to achieve with this behavior. However, his aunt downplayed his argument and refused to help. Strangely, no one in the house, neither his aunt nor his paternal grandmother, seemed to be outraged by the fact that the calls also occurred in the early morning, and they did not bother to look into how to stop them or identify the person responsible.
This had the strange appearance of orchestrated torture. Even when José asked his aunt to unplug the phone at night so he could sleep, she refused, arguing that one of her sons, who lived in Italy, could call at any moment (considering the six-hour time difference between the two countries). What made things even stranger was Monica’s fixation on Sandra, even though they hadn’t even met. Monica didn’t attend the high school where José and Sandra were enrolled, but she began to feel jealous of Sandra after finding a folder with one of José’s group projects. The folder listed the names of two women, including Sandra, but for some strange reason, Monica became fixated only on Sandra’s name.
Although José initially ignored Sandra’s phone calls, over time he relented and contacted Sandra again, influenced by biblical teachings that advised praying for those who persecuted him. However, Sandra manipulated him emotionally, alternating between insults and requests for him to keep looking for her. After months of this cycle, Jose discovered that it was all a trap. Sandra falsely accused him of sexual harassment, and as if that wasn’t bad enough, Sandra sent some criminals to beat up Jose.
That Tuesday, without José knowing it, Sandra had already set a trap for him.
Days before, José had told his friend Johan about the situation he was going through with Sandra. Johan also suspected that Sandra’s strange behavior might be due to some kind of witchcraft by Mónica. That Tuesday, José visited his old neighborhood where he had lived in 1995 and happened to run into Johan. After hearing more details about the situation, Johan recommended that José forget about Sandra and instead go out to a nightclub to meet women—perhaps he would find someone who could make him forget her. José thought it was a good idea.
So they got on a bus and headed toward the nightclub in downtown Lima. Coincidentally, the route of that bus passed near the IDAT institute. Just one block before reaching IDAT, José suddenly had the idea to get off for a moment to pay for a Saturday course he had enrolled in. He had managed to save some money for it by selling his computer and working for a week in a warehouse. However, he had been forced to quit because they exploited workers with 16-hour shifts while officially recording only 12, and if they refused to complete the week, they were threatened with not being paid at all.
So José turned to Johan and said, ‘I study here on Saturdays. Since we’re passing by, let’s get off for a bit, I’ll pay for my course, and then we’ll head to the nightclub.’
The moment José stepped off the bus, before even crossing the avenue, he was shocked to see Sandra standing right there on the corner of the institute. In disbelief, he told Johan, ‘Johan, I can’t believe it—Sandra is right there. She’s the girl I told you about, the one who acts so strangely. Wait for me here; I’m going to ask if she got the letter where I warned her about Mónica’s threats against her, and maybe she can finally explain what’s going on with her and what she wants from me with all her calls.’
Johan stayed back as José approached. But as soon as he started speaking—’Sandra, did you see the letters? Can you finally explain to me what’s going on with you?’—Sandra, without saying a word, gestured with her hand, signaling three thugs who had been hiding in different spots: one in the middle of the avenue, another behind Sandra, and another behind José.
The one standing behind Sandra stepped forward and said, ‘So you’re the sexual harasser who’s been bothering my cousin?’
José, caught off guard, responded, ‘What? Me, a harasser? On the contrary, she’s the one harassing me! If you read the letter, you’d see it’s about me trying to understand why she keeps calling me!’
Before he could react, one of the thugs grabbed him by the neck from behind and threw him to the ground. Then, together with the one who had claimed to be Sandra’s cousin, they started kicking him. Meanwhile, the third thug went through his pockets, robbing him. It was three against one—José, lying helpless on the pavement.
Luckily, his friend Johan jumped into the fight, managing to give José a chance to get up. But then the third thug picked up some rocks and started throwing them at both José and Johan.
The attack only stopped when a traffic officer intervened. The officer turned to Sandra and said, ‘If he’s harassing you, then file a complaint.’
Sandra, visibly nervous, quickly left, knowing full well that her accusation was false.
José, though deeply betrayed, did not go to the police. He had no way to prove the months of harassment he had suffered from Sandra. But beyond the shock of her betrayal, one question haunted him:
‘How did she already have this ambush set up when I never come to this place on Tuesday nights? I only come here to study on Saturday mornings.’
This made José suspect that Sandra wasn’t just an ordinary person—she might be a witch with some kind of supernatural power.
These events left a deep mark on Jose, who seeks justice and to expose those who manipulated him. In addition, he seeks to derail the advice in the Bible, such as: pray for those who insult you, because by following that advice, he fell into Sandra’s trap.
Jose’s testimony.
I am José Carlos Galindo Hinostroza, the author of the blog: https://gabriels.work
I was born in Peru, that photo is mine, it is from 1997, I was 22 years old.
At that time, I was entangled in the intrigues of Sandra Elizabeth, a former classmate from the IDAT institute. I was confused about what was happening to her (She harassed me in a very complex and extensive way to narrate in this image, but I narrate it at the bottom of this blog: and in this video:
). I did not rule out the possibility that Mónica Nieves, my ex-girlfriend, had done some witchcraft to her.
When searching for answers in the Bible, I read in Matthew 5:
‘ Pray for whoever insults you,’
And in those days, Sandra insulted me while telling me she didn’t know what was happening to her, that she wanted to continue being my friend, and that I should keep calling and looking for her again and again, and it went on like this for five months. In short, Sandra pretended to be possessed by something to keep me confused. The lies in the Bible made me believe that good people can behave evilly because of an evil spirit. That’s why the advice to pray for her didn’t seem so crazy to me—because before, Sandra pretended to be a friend, and I fell for her deception.
Thieves often use the strategy of pretending to have good intentions: To steal from stores, they pretend to be customers; to ask for tithes, they pretend to preach the word of God, but they preach that of Rome, etc., etc. Sandra Elizabeth pretended to be a friend, then pretended to be a friend in trouble looking for my help, but all to slander me and ambush me with three criminals, surely out of spite because a year earlier I rejected her advances since I was in love with Monica Nieves, to whom I was faithful. But Monica did not trust my fidelity and threatened to kill Sandra Elizabeth, which is why I broke up with Monica slowly, over eight months, so that Monica wouldn’t think it was because of Sandra. But this is how Sandra Elizabeth paid me back—with slander. She falsely accused me of sexually harassing her, and with that pretext, she ordered three criminals to beat me up—all in front of her.
I narrate all this in my blog and in my YouTube videos:
I do not wish for other righteous men to have bad experiences like I had, which is why I have created what you are reading. I know this will irritate unrighteous people like Sandra, but the truth is like the true gospel—it only favors the righteous.
The evil of José’s family overshadows Sandra’s evil:
José suffered a devastating betrayal by his own family, who not only refused to help him stop Sandra’s harassment but also falsely accused him of having a mental illness. His own relatives used these accusations as a pretext to kidnap and torture him, sending him twice to mental health institutions and a third time to a hospital.
It all began when José read Exodus 20:5 and stopped being Catholic. From that moment on, he became outraged by the Church’s dogmas and started protesting against its doctrines on his own. He also advised his relatives to stop praying to images and told them that he was praying for a friend (Sandra) who was apparently bewitched or possessed. José was under stress due to the harassment, but his relatives did not tolerate him exercising his freedom of religious expression. As a result, they destroyed his professional life, his health, and his reputation by locking him up in mental institutions where he was given sedatives.
Not only was he forcibly institutionalized, but after his release, he was forced to continue taking psychiatric medication under the threat of being locked up again. He fought to break free from those chains, and during the last two years of that injustice, with his programming career ruined, he was forced to work without pay at his uncle’s restaurant. That same uncle betrayed his trust by secretly drugging his meals with psychiatric pills. José only discovered the truth in 2007 thanks to a kitchen assistant named Lidia, who warned him about what was happening.
From 1998 to 2007, José lost nearly ten years of his youth due to his treacherous relatives. In hindsight, he realized that his mistake was defending the Bible to reject Catholicism, as his family never allowed him to read it. They committed this injustice knowing he had no financial resources to defend himself. When he finally broke free from the forced medication, he thought he had earned their respect. His maternal uncles and cousins even offered him a job, but years later, they betrayed him again with such hostility that he was forced to resign. This made him realize that he should never have forgiven them, as their bad intentions were clear.
From that moment on, he decided to study the Bible again, and in 2017, he began noticing its contradictions. Little by little, he understood why God had allowed his relatives to prevent him from defending the Bible in his youth. He discovered biblical inconsistencies and started exposing them in his blogs, where he also recounted the story of his faith and the suffering he endured at the hands of Sandra and, most of all, his own family.
For this reason, in December 2018, his mother attempted to kidnap him again with the help of corrupt police officers and a psychiatrist who issued a false certificate. They accused him of being a ‘dangerous schizophrenic’ to have him institutionalized again, but the attempt failed because he was not home. There were witnesses to the incident, and José had audio recordings, which he presented as evidence to the Peruvian authorities in his complaint, but it was dismissed.
His family knew perfectly well that he was not insane—he had a stable job, a child, and the mother of his child to take care of. However, despite knowing the truth, they attempted to kidnap him again using the same old false accusation. His own mother and other fanatical Catholic relatives led the attempt. Although his complaint was ignored by the Ministry, José exposes these truths in his blogs, making it clear that the evil of his family eclipses even that of Sandra.
Here is the evidence of the kidnappings using the slander of traitors:
‘This man is a schizophrenic who urgently needs psychiatric treatment and pills for life.’
I have been a computer programmer, I like logic, in Turbo Pascal I created a program capable of producing basic algebra formulas at random, similar to the formula below. In the following document in .PDF you can download the code of the program, this is proof that I’m not stupid, that’s why the conclusions of my research should be taken seriously. https://ntiend.me/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/math21.pdf
If v-00=72 then v=72 «Cupid is condemned to hell along with the other pagan gods (The fallen angels for their rebellion against justice, sent to eternal punishment). █
Quoting these passages does not mean defending the entire Bible. If 1 John 5:19 says that “the whole world is under the power of the evil one,” but rulers swear on the Bible, then the Devil rules with them. If the Devil rules with them, then fraud also rules with them. Therefore, the Bible contains part of that fraud, camouflaged among truths. By connecting those truths, we can expose their deceptions. Righteous people need to know these truths so that, if they have been deceived by lies added to the Bible or other similar books, they can free themselves from them.
Daniel 12:7 And I heard the man clothed in linen, who was above the waters of the river, when he raised his right hand and his left hand to heaven and swore by Him who lives forever that it shall be for a time, times, and half a time. And when the power of the holy people is completely shattered, all these things shall be finished.
Considering that ‘Devil’ means ‘Slanderer,’ it is natural to expect that the Roman persecutors, being the adversaries of the saints, later bore false witness against the saints and their messages. Thus, they themselves are the Devil, and not an intangible entity that enters and exits people, as they made us believe precisely with passages like Luke 22:3 (“Then Satan entered Judas…”), Mark 5:12-13 (the demons entering the pigs), and John 13:27 (“After the morsel, Satan entered him”).
This is my purpose: to help righteous people not waste their power believing in the lies of impostors who have adulterated the original message, which never asked anyone to kneel before anything or pray to anything that had ever been visible.
It is no coincidence that in this image, promoted by the Roman Church, Cupid appears alongside other pagan gods. They have given the names of the true saints to these false gods, but look at how these men dress and how they wear their long hair. All this goes against faithfulness to God’s laws because it is a sign of rebellion, a sign of the fallen angels (Deuteronomy 22:5).
The serpent, the devil, or Satan (the slanderer) in hell (Isaiah 66:24, Mark 9:44). Matthew 25:41: “Then he will also say to those on his left: ‘Depart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire that has been prepared for the devil and his angels’.” Hell: the eternal fire prepared for the serpent and his angels (Revelation 12:7-12), for having combined truths with heresies in the Bible, the Quran, the Torah, and for having created false forbidden gospels that they called apocryphal, to give credibility to lies in the false sacred books, all in rebellion against justice.
Book of Enoch 95:6: “Woe to you, false witnesses and to those who weigh the price of injustice, for you will perish suddenly!” Book of Enoch 95:7: “Woe to you, unjust ones who persecute the righteous, for you yourselves will be handed over and persecuted because of that injustice, and the burden of your guilt will fall upon you!” Proverbs 11:8: “The righteous is delivered from trouble, and the wicked comes in his place.” Proverbs 16:4: “The Lord has made all things for Himself, even the wicked for the day of doom.”
Book of Enoch 94:10: “Unjust ones, I say to you that He who created you will overthrow you; upon your ruin, God will have no mercy, but rather, God will rejoice in your destruction.” Satan and his angels in hell: the second death. They deserve it for lying against Christ and His faithful disciples, accusing them of being the authors of Rome’s blasphemies in the Bible, such as love for the devil (the enemy).
Isaiah 66:24: “And they shall go out and look upon the corpses of the men who have rebelled against me; for their worm shall never die, nor shall their fire be quenched, and they shall be abhorrent to all flesh.” Mark 9:44: “Where their worm does not die, and the fire is never quenched.” Revelation 20:14: “Then Death and Hades were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death: the lake of fire.”
The impostor dressed as a lamb speaks meekly, but his appetite betrays him when he sees meat. The true lamb withdraws when he sees meat and blood on the table; the wolf in sheep’s clothing draws near with desire, because his nature is to devour, not to graze.
Without the invention of sins and the need to cleanse them, nor the fabricated need for intermediaries, pilgrimages, images, statues, and temples, false prophets make no business; they need lies to be believed, because with truth they cannot profit.
Word of Satan: ‘Hypocrites, bring me that papal coin, whose face is it? Give to Caesar what is Caesar’s… for my kingdom thrives on your tributes while my priests enrich themselves with what you call offerings.’
Word of Satan: «When the text favors the righteous, demand that no one interpret it literally (Psalms 58:10, Psalms 41:10-12); when it favors the wicked, quote it in full (1 Peter 3:18, Luke 23:34). What matters is that no one discovers that I infiltrated the texts (Daniel 8:25, Revelation 12:9).»
Do you really think translating the Bible into all languages preserves the truth? Rome invented scriptures to replace those it hid, aiming for the oppressed to forgive the thief and forget the robbery, because Rome also stole. Look for yourself: Matthew 5:39-41 — how Rome taught the oppressed not to claim what is theirs.
Word of Satan: «It does not matter who wins the debate; what matters is that my texts continue to be revered afterward. As long as no one can examine them without reverence, truth will always have to ask permission to speak.»
Word of Jupiter/Zeus (Satan: adversary of Gabriel, and Greco-Roman god worshipped by the adversaries of the saints): «I allowed the controversies among sects because each side, in trying to defend its version of my lie, ends up reinforcing the worship of tyranny. The fraudster at the altar smiles while the crowd argues over passages, because as long as attention remains on the adulterated book, no one looks toward the money box or toward the crown that kisses my image in front of everyone.»
The false prophet: ‘Miracles are guaranteed—unless they don’t happen, then it’s your fault for not buying enough candles.’
The false prophet: ‘God loves sheep, but He does not protect them from wolves because God also loves wolves and wants them to feed on them; God loves everyone.’
Word of Satan: ‘The whole world is under the evil one… that is why my church makes deals with its leaders, that is why my word spreads as sacred among the peoples.’
Cine este responsabil pentru rău, ‘Satana’ sau persoana care comite răul? https://antibestia.com/2026/07/11/cine-este-responsabil-pentru-rau-satana-sau-persoana-care-comite-raul/
Хоёр Сарандаа Залгиулсан Гараг https://ellameencontrara.com/2026/07/01/idi64moons/
Only keen observers notice. Word of Lucifer (Satan): ‘Happy are those who do not seek joy in the kisses of a faithful wife but in being worthy to behold the light of my face.’ He who promotes idolatry does not seek truth, he seeks clients.»
