Where is the resurrected Lazarus if, according to the Bible, all men die only once? (Video language:Arabic) /367/ https://youtu.be/gCJMiUABmUY,
Day 197
Jacob Deceived a Blind Man… And God Loved Him? (Video language:Swahili) /345/ https://youtu.be/lFqyiZ6SVUA
«What Did Jonah Breathe Inside the Whale? Great Fish or Great Deception?
Jonah and the Great Fish: Historical Truth or a Great Myth? Do you really believe the whale story?
The story of Nineveh repenting en masse is an absurdity that does not fit with the story of the destruction of Sodom. But the problem is not only biological, it is theological and political. This narrative fits perfectly with the message of Ezekiel 33:11 (which says that the wicked can indeed change), but it directly contradicts Daniel 12:10, which states that the nature of the wicked is immutable and that they will never become righteous.
If the wicked are wicked by nature, then are there wicked people with an expiration date and others without one? I do not believe the story of the ‘good thief,’ nor that of criminals suddenly becoming saints overnight.
Why do such blatant contradictions exist in the Bible? To me, there is a clear explanation: the Roman Empire manufactured Christianity. By adulterating the texts and mixing its lies with the messages of the peoples it persecuted, it sowed the chaos and incoherence that we see today.
Think about it: if the wicked could become righteous, why did the original law decree Eye for Eye? The answer is political. The Roman Empire found it convenient to erase just retribution and replace it with the false hope of conversion. In this way, they kept peoples subdued, making them believe that the justice of ‘eye for eye’ was obsolete.
Fantastic fables such as the instant conversion of Nineveh or the transformation of Saul into Paul fit perfectly into the Roman agenda of submission and impunity. In the end, absurd stories such as surviving for three days inside the stomach of a great fish only expose the fiction.
The context of the narrative: The plot of this myth places Jonah fleeing from a divine command to warn Nineveh (the capital of the Assyrian Empire and a historic enemy) of its destruction because of its extreme wickedness. During his escape by ship, a fierce storm breaks out, and to save the crew, Jonah asks to be thrown into the water; at that very moment, the sea magically calms down (Jonah 1:15). Instead of drowning, he is swallowed by a great fish where he spends three days and three nights praying (Jonah 1:17). After being spit out onto dry land, he travels to Nineveh and, in a completely implausible twist, the entire population and its king suddenly ‘convert’ through fasting (Jonah 3:5-8), causing the punishment to be canceled (Jonah 3:10). A manufactured moral intended to legitimize impunity.
The signature of manipulation: Why logic destroys the myths that certain groups try to ‘bless’ using AI
Scene: An ancient man speaks as if giving his testimony.
Ancient man:
‘I survived drowning in the sea… without drowning inside the whale… nor being dissolved by the acids… for three days.’
[Thousands of years later. A modern man finishes reading the story.]
Modern man:
‘I do not believe you at all.’
‘A whale’s stomach does not contain breathable air, but suffocating digestive gases such as methane and carbon dioxide.’
‘A human being would die from asphyxiation within a few minutes.’
‘Were you perhaps wearing a special suit with oxygen tanks included at the moment when you were supposedly swallowed by the cetacean?’
‘Because in your time… oxygen tanks did not exist.’
The Deception of the ‘Technological Oracle’
On May 31, 2026, I found a video on YouTube that is a textbook example of how people’s minds are numbed through technological astonishment. The content, sensationalistically titled around how ‘Grok AI analyzes all the prayers of the Bible and discovers something surprising,’ attempts to use Artificial Intelligence and quantum physics as a magic trick to validate religious dogmas and sell a false narrative of absolute perfection.
The video claims that the AI ‘discovered’ a universal four-step mathematical algorithm in every answered prayer and that the number seven is stamped throughout the text in a way that ‘defies chance.’
What is the real objective? To make the viewer assume that, because a supposedly neutral machine says it, the book must be infallible. But incoherence is exposed, not blessed. Respecting God means respecting truth, and when we pass this narrative through the filter of formal logic and history, the ‘divine design’ is revealed for what it really is: human editorial engineering.
That same day, I left this comment under the video:
CRITICAL ANALYSIS: AI did not discover a divine design; it discovered the hidden signature of imperial editors.
What a fascinating video in its effort to use Artificial Intelligence (AI) as a tool to validate dogmas. However, when true critical thinking and logic are applied, this entire narrative of ‘mathematical perfection’ is completely stripped bare and exposes its own inconsistencies. A message that comes from God must be true, coherent, and never contradict itself; incoherence is exposed, not blessed by calling it a ‘mystery.’ Let us dismantle this deception point by point:
1_ The Myth of the ‘4-Stage Algorithm’ (Confirmation Bias): The video astonishingly claims that the AI discovered a ‘universal secret protocol’ (Anchoring, Alignment, Surrender, and Persistence). This does not prove that the book comes from God; it is merely an analysis of editorial engineering. Artificial Intelligences do not discover mystical truths; they process data according to the instructions of whoever writes the prompt. If you program a machine to search for a specific pattern within a text that was previously edited, trimmed, and unified by a political power, the AI will construct the exact argument you asked for. What the video celebrates is actually the detection of the writing template and structural imitation deliberately used by textual engineers so that scattered writings would forcibly fit together into one coordinated product.
2_ The Clash of Imperial Signatures (The 7 and the 19): Toward the end, the video attempts to use the numerology of the number 7 as proof that the text comes from God. However, the destructive logic of the empires themselves tears down that fantasy: if the Roman Empire persecuted with blood and fire the true religion of Jesus (which defended not worshiping images and maintaining the laws of justice), and later took absolute control of all the writings, then it was expected that it would leave its hidden signature within the structure. The pattern of 7 in the Bible and the pattern of 19 in the Quran do not prove that the books came from God; they are the watermarks of the same Roman machinery of control. The proof is that these signatures contradict each other at the very core of the message: the 7 of the Bible seeks to validate that God has a son, while the 19 of the Quran seeks to validate that God has no sons. If the message were divine, whom would you believe? God does not contradict Himself. This mathematical friction demonstrates that both codes are the fingerprint of the same political designer who fabricated false religions in order to divert the original message.
3_ The Biological Absurdity and the Science that Refutes the Manipulation: If the defenders of these texts intend to use science to validate miracles, they are obligated to demonstrate that those stories are coherent with the reality of creation. But the human manipulation is immediately exposed. Take the example of Jonah: from the standpoint of biology and medical physics, it is absolutely impossible for a human being to survive three days inside the stomach of a cetacean. He would die of asphyxiation within minutes due to gastric gases such as methane, and his body would have been disintegrated by hydrochloric acid and digestive enzymes. Modifying narratives to include biologically unsustainable myths demonstrates that the text was altered by human hands seeking to impress the masses through astonishment rather than truth.
4_ The Paradox of Lazarus and the Textual Inconsistencies: The imperial dogma self-destructs when the texts are compared. Hebrews 9:27 categorically states a law: ‘it is appointed unto men once to die.’ However, John 11 claims that Lazarus was resurrected. Faced with this contradiction, logic leaves us with only three options: either Lazarus is still alive after more than 2,000 years (an absurdity), or Lazarus died twice (which would make Hebrews false), or the story was a theological invention later added by imperial editors in an attempt to force a ‘coherence’ with the resurrections they themselves had planted in earlier narratives (such as those of Elijah and Elisha). The same absurdity applies to Matthew 27:52 and its ‘dead walking through Jerusalem,’ an event about which the historical records of the time remain completely silent. An incoherent message cannot come from God.
5_ The Nonsense of ‘Quantum Mysticism’: Ending the video by pretending that faith works like the ‘observer effect’ in quantum mechanics, where human belief ‘collapses the wave function’ in order to create a physical miracle, is an insult to particle physics. Quantum mechanics operates strictly at the subatomic scale; it has absolutely nothing to do with human psychology or theology. Mixing physics with miracles is the desperate tactic of modern charlatanism to dress manipulated dogma in high-tech clothing.
Conclusión: What this video celebrates as a ‘mathematical proof discovered by AI’ is actually the success of Roman control engineering 1600 years later. AI did not find a message coming from God; it found the fingerprint of the empire that forced humanity to bow before stones, cubes, and statues, contradicting the original commandment not to worship objects made by human hands. Do not be deceived by elegant words: this is not science, it is a political construction of spiritual control conveniently monetized with a cryptocurrency advertisement in the middle of the video.
Closing of the comment:
Do not be deceived by technological jargon or textbook quantum mysticism: AI is only reading the code that imperial editors deliberately planted to control thought. Rome did not only alter the recent texts (the New Testament); in order to impose its new political religion, it needed to adulterate original Judaism (the religion of Jesus that it actually persecuted) and carry out a retrospective reengineering of the ancient texts so that the entire collection would appear to be a unified and perfect design.
But the manipulation left loose ends and evident frictions if we look at the explicit message. In Revelation 15:3, the text states that the saints sing at the same time ‘the song of Moses and the song of the Lamb.’ Who can logically explain how the vengeful song of Moses in Deuteronomy 32 (where God sharpens His glittering sword, makes His arrows drunk with blood, and executes relentless eye-for-an-eye retribution) can be sung together with a supposed song that preaches submission, meekness, and offering the other cheek to the enemy without taking vengeance against him? It is an aberrant theological and literary contradiction.
Could this instead be a clue that survived in the text to tell us that the true message of Jesus fit perfectly with that of Moses, and therefore never denied the strict justice of eye for eye against the wicked? Everything points to Rome inserting its editorial hand to change the original ‘Song of the Lion’ into the ‘Song of the Lamb,’ domesticating the religion of Jesus in order to manufacture submissive subjects before the oppressor. Respecting the truth means exposing the incoherence of this imperial design.
See more about that video and the original comment here in this Portuguese publication: https://gabriels.work/2026/05/31/1-registro-das-batalhas-no-ciberespaco-apocalipse-127-e-houve-guerra-no-ceu-miguel-e-os-seus-anjos-lutaram-contra-o-dragao-e-lutaram-o-dragao-e-os-seus-anjos/
«
«In Mark 3:29, the ‘sin against the Holy Spirit’ is warned as unforgivable. However, history and the practices of Rome reveal a shocking moral inversion: the truly unforgivable sin, according to their dogma, is questioning the credibility of their Bible. Meanwhile, serious crimes such as the killing of innocents have been ignored or justified under the same authority that claimed to be infallible. This post examines how this ‘unique sin’ was constructed and how the institution used it to protect its power while justifying historical injustices.
In purposes contrary to Christ is the Antichrist, if you read Isaiah 11 you will see the mission of Christ in his second life, and it is not to favor everyone but only the righteous, but the Antichrist is inclusive, despite being unjust, he wants to climb onto Noah’s Ark, despite being unjust he wants to leave Sodom with Lot… Happy are those to whom these words are not offensive. He who is not offended by this message, that one is righteous, congratulations to him: Christianity was created by the Romans, only a mind friendly to celibacy, proper of Greek and Roman leaders, enemies of the ancient Jews, could conceive a message like the one that says: ‘These are the ones who did not defile themselves with women, for they remained virgins. They follow the Lamb wherever he goes. They were purchased from among mankind and offered as firstfruits to God and to the Lamb’ in Revelation 14:4, or a message like this one which is similar: ‘For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like the angels of God in heaven,’ in Matthew 22:30, both messages sound as if they came from a Roman Catholic priest, and not from a prophet of God who seeks this blessing for himself: He who finds a wife finds what is good and receives favor from the Lord (Proverbs 18:22), Leviticus 21:14 A widow, or a divorced woman, or a woman who has been defiled, or a prostitute, he shall not marry; but he shall take as a wife a virgin from his own people.
I am not Christian; I am henotheist. I believe in one supreme God above all, and I believe that several created gods exist—some faithful, others deceivers. I only pray to the supreme God. But since I was indoctrinated from childhood in Roman Christianity, I believed in its teachings for many years. I applied those ideas even when common sense told me otherwise. For example—so to speak—I turned the other cheek to a woman who had already struck me on one. A woman who, at first, acted like a friend, but then, without justification, began treating me as if I were her enemy, with strange and contradictory behavior. Influenced by the Bible, I believed she had become an enemy because of some spell, and that what she needed was prayer to return to being the friend she had once shown herself to be (or pretended to be). But in the end, everything only got worse. As soon as I had the chance to dig deeper, I uncovered the lie and felt betrayed in my faith. I came to understand that many of those teachings did not come from the true message of justice, but from Roman Hellenism infiltrated into the Scriptures. And I confirmed I had been deceived. That’s why I now denounce Rome and its fraud. I do not fight against God, but against the slanders that have corrupted His message. Proverbs 29:27 declares that the righteous hates the wicked. However, 1 Peter 3:18 claims that the righteous died for the wicked. Who can believe that someone would die for those he hates? To believe it is to have blind faith; it is to accept incoherence. And when blind faith is preached, could it be because the wolf wants his prey not to see the deception?
Jehovah will shout like a mighty warrior: ‘I will take vengeance on My enemies!’
(Revelation 15:3 + Isaiah 42:13 + Deuteronomy 32:41 + Nahum 1:2–7)
And what about the so-called ‘love for the enemy’ that, according to some Bible verses, the Son of Jehovah supposedly preached—claiming we should imitate His Father’s perfection through universal love? (Mark 12:25–37, Psalm 110:1–6, Matthew 5:38–48)
That is a lie spread by the enemies of both Father and Son.
A false doctrine born from mixing Hellenism with sacred words.»
1 The images of the Devil were passed off as images of the saints https://144k.xyz/2026/09/15/the-images-of-the-devil-were-passed-off-as-images-of-the-saints/ 2 Berjalan di Tepi Kematian Sepanjang Jalur Gelap, Namun Tetap Mencari Cahaya. Menafsirkan cahaya yang menyinari pegunungan untuk menghindari langkah yang salah, untuk melarikan diri dari maut. https://144k.xyz/2026/07/05/berjalan-di-tepi-kematian-sepanjang-jalur-gelap-namun-tetap-mencari-cahaya-menafsirkan-cahaya-yang-menyinari-pegunungan-untuk-menghindari-langkah-yang-salah-untuk-melarikan-diri-dari-maut/ 3 और यदि वे दिन घटाए न जाते, तो कोई भी प्राणी बचाया न जाता; परन्तु चुने हुओं के कारण वे दिन घटाए जाएँगे। https://144k.xyz/2026/06/04/idi45ur/ 4 Sandra began harassing him in 1995 with anonymous phone calls, in which she made noises with the keyboard and hung up. https://ntiend.me/2026/03/21/the-religion-i-defend-is-named-justice/ 5 As profecias de Isaías que desafiam as religiões criadas com enganos pelo Império Romano https://depuracion-del-mensaje.blogspot.com/2026/05/as-profecias-de-isaias-que-desafiam-as.html
«The man Gabriel exposes the inconsistency of Zeus’s message: ‘Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for justice, as long as they forget eye for an eye and love the enemy of justice.’
Isaiah 42:17 They shall be turned back and utterly put to shame who trust in idols, who say to cast images, ‘You are our gods.’ If any of those images, to which people pray, could be made of flesh and bone and walk through our streets, posing as a saint, like an angel carrying the supposed message ‘love your enemy, do not exclude me,’ surely a coherent and informed man could unmask him like this: ‘John 3:16 claims that God loved the world. John 17:9 says that Jesus did not pray for the world. Two texts, one single question: how do they fit together? And, speaking of things that don’t fit, you don’t fool me. If Daniel 9:21 says that Gabriel is a man, and if Deuteronomy 22:5 points out that Jehovah abhors a man who dresses like a woman, yet Gabriel is loved by God, you cannot be Gabriel.’
THE COMMON DOGMA (Christianity and Islam)
Christianity and Islam affirm that Gabriel announced the virginal birth of Jesus to fulfill Isaiah (Matthew 1 / Qur’an 19).
But Isaiah 7:14–16 does not announce Jesus nor speak of a ‘perpetual virgin.’
The sign was given to King Ahaz and had to be fulfilled immediately, before the child knew how to distinguish between good and evil.
Isaiah speaks of a young woman, not of a woman who remained a virgin after giving birth.
The fulfillment is found in Hezekiah, a faithful king in the time of Ahaz: he destroys the bronze serpent (2 Kings 18:4–7), God was with him (Emmanuel), and the Assyrian defeat was prophesied by Isaiah (2 Kings 19:35–37).
Christianity and Islam: virginal birth (common dogma).
The perpetual virginal birth, shared by Christianity and Islam, does not come from Isaiah, but from a later reinterpretation imposed by Rome.
These contradictions do not come from God.
A tyrannical empire did not want peoples who uphold their dignity, but peoples on their knees before anything that grants it authority, no matter its form.
Exodus 20:4–5 ‘You shall not bow down to any image of anything that exists in heaven (birds, the moon, the sun, etc.), on the earth (humans, serpents, golden calves, pyrite (pyrite is a mineral that has a cubic shape), etc.), or in the water (fish, etc.).’ Leviticus 26:1 ‘You shall not make for yourselves idols or carved images, nor set up pillars, nor place engraved stones in your land to bow down to them; for I am Jehovah your God.’ When a person kneels before an image to pray or to show respect, that person worships that image; the image becomes his idol. That is why God approved that King Hezekiah destroyed the bronze serpent that God had commanded Moses to make, since when God commanded specific images for specific uses, He never commanded that those images receive worship. 2 Kings 18:4 ‘He removed the high places, broke the images, cut down the Asherah poles, and broke in pieces the bronze serpent that Moses had made, for until those days the children of Israel had been burning incense to it; and he called it ‘a piece of bronze.» The Bible and the Qur’an share a common lie that shows their Roman origin. The Bible says that the angel Gabriel announced that Jesus would be born of a virgin to fulfill a prophecy of Isaiah, and the Qur’an also says that the angel Gabriel announced the virgin birth of Jesus. But that is not true, because Isaiah prophesied the birth of a faithful king who broke the bronze serpent that Moses made, because that creature was being idolized. Furthermore, Isaiah never said that the woman would remain a virgin even after becoming pregnant to give birth to King Hezekiah, son of Ahaz; God was with Hezekiah and with his faithful servants, therefore Hezekiah was Immanuel (read Isaiah 7 and connect it with 2 Kings 18).
a) They worship statues or pray in the name of one or more creatures.
b) The virgin birth of Jesus is a common belief in Christianity and Islam.
Islam
c) They worship a cube.
Judaism
d) They worship a wall.
Christianity — Islam — Judaism
e) These religions make people pray to creatures or bow down before objects made by man in order to humble themselves before them. And that is what the prophet Isaiah condemned (Isaiah 2:8–9).
Is it necessary to obtain archaeological evidence of deception when we already have logical proof? The so-called sacred messages are not consistent. How can the same God protect a murderer from the death penalty in Genesis 4:15, and then condemn murderers to death in Numbers 33:35? If Rome killed those whom it persecuted, and those whom it persecuted belonged to a religion that Rome did not accept, one thing is clear to me: that religion could not have been a new one that denied the law and the prophecies of the Jewish people, but rather the same religion that already existed before Jesus. In fact, according to the Bible, Jesus came to confirm the law and the prophets. If Judaism essentially contains that, why not say that the religion of Jesus was in fact Judaism? Although not the current Judaism, which I will substantiate: as I have shown, treating everyone well because we would like to be treated that way, and loving the enemy, do not align with either the law or the prophets. However, according to the Bible, Jesus said that these teachings summarize the law and the prophets. Nevertheless, I have already shown that these doctrines not only contradict the ‘eye for an eye’ of the law and the God who hates His enemies and loves His friends as described by the prophets, but also originate from the Greek sage Cleobulus of Lindos. If Rome was able to pass off the teachings of a Greek as if they were those of the faithful king of the Jews, what assures us that it did not also alter the texts of what Rome called the ‘Old Testament’? And if those texts match what we know today as ‘Judaism,’ should we trust that it is the authentic Judaism that was persecuted by Rome?
Image on the left: The statue of Zeus in the Vatican. Do you still believe the image on the right is the face of Jesus on the Shroud of Turin? 2 Corinthians 11:4 ‘For if someone comes and preaches another Jesus, whom we have not preached…’ ‘The real Jesus had short hair!’ 1 Corinthians 11:14 ‘Does not nature itself teach you that it is disgraceful for a man to grow long hair?’ Galatians 1:9 ‘As we have said before, so now I say again: If anyone preaches to you a gospel different from the one you received, let them be accursed.’ (Faithful to the true gospel, Paul has cursed his enemies!) ‘The Romans are those cursed ones!’ The Word of Zeus: ‘Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for justice, as long as they forget an eye for an eye and love the enemy… of justice.’ Teaching of Cleobulus of Lindos: ‘Do good to your friends and your enemies…’ Teaching of Jesus? Matthew 5:44 ‘…do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who mistreat you and persecute you…’
The prophecies about the vinegar and the garments divided by lot contain no message of forgiveness toward the murderers.
Psalm 22:16 For dogs have surrounded me; a band of evildoers has encircled me; they pierced my hands and my feet. 17 I can count all my bones; meanwhile, they look and stare at me. 18 They divided my garments among themselves, and for my clothing they cast lots.
Psalm 69:21 They also gave me gall for my food, and in my thirst they gave me vinegar to drink. 22 Let their table before them become a snare, and what should have been for their welfare become a trap. 23 Let their eyes be darkened so that they cannot see, and make their loins tremble continually. 24 Pour out your indignation upon them, and let the fury of your anger overtake them.
Proverbs 29:27 The righteous detest the wicked, and the wicked detest the righteous. Matthew 27:19 While he was sitting on the judgment seat, his wife sent word to him, saying: Have nothing to do with that righteous man, for today I have suffered greatly in a dream because of him.
According to Matthew 27:19, Jesus was righteous; according to Proverbs 29:27, the righteous hate the wicked.
If Jesus was righteous and the righteous hate the wicked, how can it be true that Jesus loved his enemies and forgave the wicked men who murdered him?
According to the Bible, the death of Jesus happened so that the prophetic scriptures would be fulfilled: Matthew 27:35 When they had crucified him, they divided his garments among themselves by casting lots, so that what was spoken by the prophet might be fulfilled: They divided my garments among themselves, and for my clothing they cast lots.
John 19:28 After this, Jesus, knowing that all things had already been accomplished, said, so that the Scripture might be fulfilled: I thirst. 29 Now a vessel full of vinegar was sitting there; so they soaked a sponge in vinegar, put it on hyssop, and brought it to his mouth. 30 When Jesus had received the vinegar, he said: It is finished. And bowing his head, he gave up his spirit.
We are told that while dying on the cross, Jesus prayed for his enemies, excusing them because ‘they do not know what they are doing’: Luke 23:34 Then Jesus said: Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing. And they divided his garments among themselves by casting lots.
But the scriptures prophesied a man who, while dying on the cross, insults his enemies: that is not love, that is hatred. Psalm 22 shows the crucified man calling his executioners dogs. In the prophecy about the vinegar, forgiveness is not requested for the enemies, but punishment; they are cursed. In addition to these contradictions, the parable of the wicked tenants that Jesus used to anticipate his death speaks about punishment against those murderers, not forgiveness. Furthermore, it points out that those tenants knew perfectly well what they were doing (Matthew 21:33-44). It is certain that he did not speak that parable against the righteous of his people, but against the persecutors, who later placed all the blame on the Jews, Jesus’ own people. If we look at Psalm 118:2-23, this becomes evident.
Did it become clear to you that Rome has adulterated the texts in order to slander its victims, presenting its slanders as truth?
Around 167 B.C., a king who worshiped Zeus sought to force the Jews to eat pork.
Antiochus IV Epiphanes threatened with death those who obeyed the law of Yahweh: ‘You shall not eat anything abominable.’
Seven men chose to die under torture rather than violate that law. (2 Maccabees 7)
They died believing that God would grant them eternal life for not betraying His commandments.
Centuries later, Rome tells us that Jesus appeared teaching:
‘It is not what enters the mouth that defiles a man.’ (Matthew 15:11)
And then we are told: ‘Nothing is unclean if it is received with thanksgiving.’ (1 Timothy 4:1–5)
Did those righteous men die for nothing? Is it just to invalidate the law for which they gave their lives?
Compare:
1 Corinthians 10:27 and Luke 10:8
teach that one may eat
whatever is set before them,
without asking questions.
But Deuteronomy 14:3–8 is explicit:
the pig is unclean; you shall not eat it.
Jesus is presented as saying:
‘I have not come to abolish the Law or the Prophets,
but to fulfill them.’
Then the question arises:
How is a law ‘fulfilled’
by declaring clean
what that same law calls unclean?
The prophecies of Isaiah concerning the final judgment
(Isaiah 65 and Isaiah 66:17)
maintain the condemnation
of eating pork.
How can one claim to respect the prophets
while contradicting their messages?
If the texts of the Bible
passed through the Roman filter,
and that empire persecuted the righteous,
why believe that everything in it
is truth and justice?
When the last of those men who
shared exactly the same faith as
those seven brothers were killed
by the Roman persecutors…
Zeus asks for worship for himself, and coins for the Caesar who worships him. These are not verses of the faith that Rome persecuted; they are verses of the religion that Rome created to keep its emperors rich, to continue worshiping its same god Jupiter (Zeus), at the expense of justice and truth.
False Christ of the Roman Empire (Zeus/Jupiter):
Zeus says: ‘Give Caesar your taxes, your coins, your offerings…’ Mark 12:16-17
Zeus says: ‘And all of you, give me your worship.’ Hebrews 1:6
The adversary of Zeus exposes the contradiction between justice based on mutual aid among the righteous and the Hellenized dogma that demands helping the unjust enemy.
The False Christ of the Roman Empire (Zeus/Jupiter) says: ‘Love your enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you…’ Matthew 5:44. Zeus adds: ‘And if you do not do it, if you do not accept me or follow my voice…’ Matthew 25:41.
The adversary of Zeus says: ‘Get away from the gates of the righteous, Satan! Your contradiction exposes you… You preach love for enemies… but you hate those who do not love you… You say not to curse anyone… but you curse those who do not serve you. The true Christ never preached love for enemies. He knew that those who worship you would feign his words; that is why in Matthew 7:22 he warned about them… he warned about them by pointing to Psalm 139:17-22: ‘I hate those who hate you, O Jehovah. I count them as my enemies.»
The Beast, the False Prophet, and the Myth of God’s Universal Love
When we read Revelation, we see that the beast, the false prophet, and the dragon are mentioned… it can be deduced that man is capable of being these three things, because Satan means the false witness; the one who gives false testimony is a man; the one who acts as a false prophet is also a man… but there are many false prophets… ‘the false prophet’ of Revelation 20 is a reference to all of them…
If God created such people, how can some say that God loves everyone? If God’s love is eternal, it cannot be said that God loved the world, for if He had done so, He would not create a new one. Yes, this contradicts a message of John. It must be accepted that the beast adulterated the original message in order to pretend to sell the love of God where it never existed for all, but only for the people of the book, since, according to Daniel 12:1, only they are saved from the tribulation. If, according to the Bible, the time of judgment will be like the days of Lot and Noah, it is absurd to suppose that God loves everyone, for if it were true, no one would perish in those days; and since it will be like the days of Lot, it is evident that not all will be saved, as in the days of Lot or Noah. If what the Bible says were true, that God does not want anyone to perish, no one would perish, because, according to the Bible, God accomplishes everything He wants; but those who want to sell false salvation need an argument, and the Roman Empire created several arguments to sell its lie.
References:
Revelation 13:11–14
‘Then I saw another beast coming up out of the earth… and he exercises all the authority of the first beast… and deceives those who dwell on the earth…’
Revelation 16:13
‘And I saw coming out of the mouth of the dragon, and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet, three unclean spirits like frogs.’
Revelation 20:10
‘And the devil who deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are…’
Daniel 12:1
‘At that time Michael shall stand up… and at that time your people shall be delivered, everyone who is found written in the book.’
Genesis 6–7 (days of Noah)
Account of the flood: only Noah, his family, and those who entered the ark survived.
Genesis 19 (days of Lot)
Destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah: only Lot and his daughters were delivered.
Gospel of Luke 17:26–30
‘As it was in the days of Noah… likewise as it was in the days of Lot… even so will it be in the day when the Son of Man is revealed.’
Second Epistle of Peter 3:9
‘The Lord… is patient… not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.’
Gospel of John 3:16
‘For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son…’
Psalms 115:3
‘Our God is in heaven; He does whatever He pleases.’
Psalms 135:6
‘Whatever the Lord pleases He does, in heaven and in earth…’
Isaiah 46:10
‘My counsel shall stand, and I will do all My pleasure.’
Job 42:2
‘I know that You can do everything, and that no purpose of Yours can be withheld.’
Revelation 13:18 says:
‘Here is wisdom. Let the one who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man. And its number is six hundred sixty-six…’
No one calls those who cannot understand to understand.
Therefore, the message was never for all humanity, but for the understanding ones.
Rome — the promoter of the image of the beast — lied,
because it never turned away from idols nor converted to justice.
This agrees with Daniel 12:10:
‘The understanding ones shall understand… but none of the wicked shall understand.’
And also with Daniel 12:3:
‘The understanding ones shall shine like the brightness of the firmament;
and those who led many to justice, like the stars forever and ever.’
Scripture is clear:
666 is not understood without understanding,
and the wicked do not have it:
2 Peter 2:12: ‘These false teachers are like irrational animals…’
1 Corinthians 2:14: ‘The natural man cannot understand…’
Proverbs 28:5: ‘Evil men do not understand justice,
but those who seek Jehovah understand all things.’
The Roman Empire remained impious because
it was impossible for it to convert to justice.
That is why it did not preach what it persecuted.
Instead, it created Roman Christianity and its doctrine of unmerited love: an injustice presented as virtue
and defended with unmerited hatred against those who question it.
Right side text:
If its idol is not worshipped, it becomes irritated
against those who do not. The beast slanders them.
Love for injustice,
including the slander
and contradiction
it implies.
The beast performs unjust works due to
its love for injustice.
Isaiah 28:13 Therefore the word of Yahweh will be to them, command upon command, command upon command, line upon line, line upon line, a little here, a little there; so that they may go and fall backward, be broken, snared, and taken captive.
Daniel 10:20 He said to me, ‘Do you know why I have come to you? For now I must return to fight against the prince of Persia; and when I finish with him, the prince of Greece will come.’ 2 Thessalonians 2:7 For the mystery of lawlessness is already at work; only he who now restrains it will do so until he himself is taken out of the way.
When the last faithful ones to Yahweh fell, Zeus said: ‘Now everyone will worship me.’ He said it through the mouths of those who worshiped him because, as they say, he lives in them and they in him.
SYMBOLIC KINSHIP: Athena / Minerva vs. Mary (Rome).
SPIRITUAL MOTHER.
Athena/Minerva: Mystical protector of Rome and Athens (not biological).
Mary: Spiritual mother imposed upon all believers.
CONNECTION WITH WISDOM.
Athena/Minerva: Goddess of wisdom and pure intellect.
Mary: Called the ‘Seat of Wisdom’ (Sedes Sapientiae).
PROTECTOR OF NATIONS.
Athena/Minerva: Patroness of the polis (Athens) and of the Roman State.
Mary: Protector of Christian nations and kingdoms.
HEAVENLY RANK.
Athena/Minerva: Deity of the heavens and of the intellectual realm.
Mary: Elevated to the title ‘Queen of Heaven.’
FORM OF WORSHIP.
Athena/Minerva: Use of statues, temples, and public rites.
Mary: Use of statues, temples, and public rites.
THE ROMAN SUBSTITUTION.
Rome replaced names, not functions. Where Athena/Minerva or Isis had previously been venerated, ‘Marian’ temples were later erected with the same maternal and heavenly symbolism. It is the same structure under a new label.
Left: The statue of Athena cries in the series ‘Saint Seiya’ (Knights of the Zodiac). Right: Rome changed the name of its goddess to Minerva, but it is the same act. https : // youtube . com / shorts / aSJ4nJu8Oww https : // youtube . com / shorts / RhAND4ErnNo
Syncretism: It is the political and religious strategy of cultural recycling. It consists of taking an ancient structure of worship, with its rites and fetishes, and simply overlaying a new narrative so that people continue obeying the same system without noticing the change. There is no faith; there is a rebranding. It is Rome’s technique for perpetuating its deities under the disguise of ‘holiness,’ ensuring that the masses never abandon the worship of matter.
APOCALYPSE 15:3 + ISAIAH 42:13 + DEUTERONOMY 32:41
Jehovah, like a giant warrior, will raise a battle cry: ‘I will take vengeance on my enemies.’ And what about the love for the enemy that, according to the Bible, the Son of Jehovah preached in order to imitate the supposed perfection of his Father based on love for everyone (Mark 12:25-37, Psalm 110:1-6, Matthew 5:38-48)? Well, that is a lie from the enemies of both, who altered many texts in order to create the Bible.
Matthew 25:41 Then he will also say to those on the left: Depart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels.
HELL: THE ETERNAL FIRE PREPARED FOR THE DRAGON (THE DEVIL) AND HIS ANGELS.
(REVELATION 12:7-12) (FOR HAVING COMBINED TRUTHS WITH HERESIES IN THE BIBLE, THE QURAN, THE TORAH, AND THE APOCRYPHA IN REBELLION AGAINST JUSTICE)
Book of Enoch 95:6 Woe to you, false witnesses and to those who value the price of injustice, for you shall perish suddenly!
Book of Enoch 95:7 Woe to you, unjust people who persecute the righteous, because you yourselves shall be delivered up and persecuted because of that injustice, and the weight of its burden shall fall upon you!
Proverbs 11:8 The righteous shall be delivered from tribulation, and the unjust shall enter in his place.
Proverbs 16:4 Jehovah has made all things for himself, even the wicked for the day of evil.
Book of Enoch 94:10 ‘I tell you, you unjust people, the One who created you will cast you down. God will have no mercy on your destruction, but will rejoice over your destruction.’
HELL ISAIAH 66:24
MARK 9:44
(Satan and his angels in Hell: The second death: they deserve it!)
They deserve it for lying against Christ and his faithful disciples by accusing them of being the authors of Rome’s blasphemies in the Bible, such as loving the Devil (the enemy).
The prophecy of Hell in the book of Isaiah, the Psalms, the Proverbs, and the book of Enoch contains messages that make it clear that God does not love his enemies. Who put false messages into the mouth of Christ except his enemies?
Mark 9:44 where their worm does not die and the fire is not quenched.
Revelation 20:14 And Death and Hades were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death, the lake of fire.
Revelation 20:15 And whoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire. (Whoever was not blessed by my words was sent to Hell.)
Isaiah 66:24 And they shall go forth and look upon the corpses of the men who rebelled against me; for their worm shall not die, nor shall their fire be quenched, and they shall be an abhorrence to all humanity.
In the didactic narrative of the image, one of the messengers protected by Jehovah says to one of those satanic angels: ‘Daniel 9:21 Gabriel is a man. Deuteronomy 22:5 God hates a man who dresses like a woman. 1 Corinthians 11:7 A man with hair like a woman is a dishonor. Therefore, you are not an angel allied with Gabriel. You are an angel of Satan.’
The Hellenized image of Christ and the saints — inspired by Zeus and Cupid — reflects a biblical message distorted by Hellenistic influence, promoted by false Roman converts. This is the source of the pro-Hellenistic lies in the Bible.
«
«What did Saint Peter feel toward his enemies? Love or Hatred?
Contradictions are the traces left behind when texts written by people with opposing wills are mixed together: the will of those who sought justice and the will of those who sought to ensure that their crimes would remain without just punishment.
‘How long, O Lord, holy and true, will you refrain from judging and avenging our blood?’ (Revelation 6:10)
I do not deny the existence of the saints; I deny the authenticity of everything the Bible attributes to them.
We are told that Saint Peter was killed by his enemies. But isn’t precisely this desire for justice — expressed in Revelation as a cry for vengeance — a screw that does not fit with the supposed ‘love of enemies,’ but rather with rejection of them?
When I began reading the Bible carefully, I found obvious contradictions. On the one hand, Sirach 12:7 states: ‘Help the good, but not the wicked, because the Most High detests them and in the end will give them what they deserve.’ On the other hand, Matthew 5:44–46 commands us to love the wicked, bless them, and do good to them, imitating a supposed universal love of God.
If Sirach says that God detests the wicked, how can Jesus teach that God loves the wicked? Did Rome preach a lying Jesus, or did Rome lie to us about what Jesus really taught? Let us not forget that everything we call the ‘Bible’ today passed through councils directed by Roman emperors, the same empire that executed Jesus. And today, the representative of the church created by that empire claims that ‘God loves everyone.’ To me, this makes no sense.
I have found more clues: the saints never loved their enemies, and the God of the saints does not love the wicked either. That example Matthew attributes to Jesus — God loving good and evil people equally — has no basis either in other scriptures or in moral logic.
Proverbs 29:27 says: ‘The righteous detest the wicked, and the wicked detest the righteous.’ If the Bible presents Jesus as righteous, and the righteous detest the wicked, how could a righteous man give his life to benefit the wicked?
However, another text attributed to a righteous man states the opposite: 1 Peter 3:18 says that ‘the righteous man died for the unrighteous.’ How can it be coherent for a saint who in other messages expresses contempt toward the wicked to speak of a righteous man sacrificing himself for them?
Consider 2 Peter 2:12: ‘Like irrational animals, born to be captured and destroyed… they will be destroyed.’ Would God give the life of his righteous son to save those who are compared to irrational animals? Does Peter contradict the feelings of the righteous, or did the unrighteous people who killed him also falsify his words?
Proverbs 17:15 adds that God detests both the one who condemns the righteous and the one who justifies the wicked. Therefore, claiming that the wicked are ‘justified by grace’ simply by believing in contradictory texts defined by representatives of the Roman Empire — and not by the saints murdered by that empire — makes no sense.
The prophecy in Psalm 5 is also clear: God does not tolerate wickedness, the wicked will not dwell with Him, and God detests those who practice iniquity.
Even so, modern religious leaders oppose the death penalty for murderers, extortionists, rapists, and robbers on the excuse that ‘God loves everyone.’ But we have already seen that this excuse has neither textual nor logical basis.
The Final Thrust Against the Dogma
Let us imagine a tyrannical dictatorship that forces people to bow their heads before a statue of its dictator, and executes by electric chair those who refuse. Centuries later, that same legacy demands that people kneel before images of the electric chair.
That is what I see when dogma demands that people kneel before the cross.
The cross was, for Rome, what the electric chair is for a modern dictatorship: an instrument of execution. There Rome not only killed Spartacus and the slaves who sought freedom, but also Jesus, Peter, and others who — as can be inferred from some texts — refused to bow their heads before the image of the beast.
Their will was on the side of justice and their works were righteous; the will of their persecutors, on the other hand, was guided by attachment to injustice. That difference between the thinking and the actions of each side is the mark on the forehead and on the hand: the mind that makes the decision and the actions that carry out that decision.
If the mark on the forehead is the mark of the beast, hearing righteous words will not make a difference: ‘the wicked will do wickedly, and none of the wicked will understand’ (Daniel 12:10). ‘Here is wisdom… the number of the beast is the number of a man’ (Revelation 13:18).
It did not make a difference before: the Roman persecutors heard the saints, but they killed them anyway.
The martyrs did not love those who killed them. ‘How long, O Lord, holy and true, will you refrain from judging and avenging our blood?’ (Rev. 6:10). That cry does not come from love of the enemy, but from the desire for justice against him.
And when dogma demands that people kneel before the instrument of execution of the enemies of the Roman Empire, it is not honoring the saints: it is honoring the will of those who killed them.
[Roman emperor, the beast] ‘We did that to them because they refused to bow down before our images.’
[Legionary mosquito] ‘Glorify the thorn in the flesh, my thorn.’
[The mosquito demands]
‘If I bite you on one limb, offer me the other limb.’
[After fumigating it, the man responds]
‘Your request was not aligned with human interests.’
The mosquito causes harm; it is its nature and it cannot avoid it. Would you tolerate someone telling you: ‘You must love them’?
[José Galindo, criticizing Peru’s legal reality in 2026] Our taxes must not be wasted on irrecoverable people who can only harm society, attacking and extorting working people, robbing them, and shedding innocent blood.
If taxes are the blood our society needs to serve good people, why allow those who harm it to suck that blood as well?
That is why I propose the legalization of the death penalty, because taking care of the bad person is protecting him, and protecting him is loving him. That is undeserved love.
Enough of loving the robber and the extortionist. Enough of loving the enemy. Enough of loving the mosquito.
Visit my website: penademuerteya.com.
[Satan to Satan]: Satan accepts our revised gospel:
‘Do not resist evil. Turn the other cheek.’
[Satan to Satan]: Exactly. You preach my message, but Michael preaches resisting evil with an eye for an eye.
[The adversary of Satan, the one who justly accuses him] ‘I will put an end to your deception with the truth. You will be resisted and you will be defeated. Michael preaches resisting evil with an eye for an eye. I am here to defeat you through resistance. I resist evil.’
Do not let yourself be deceived. This is not the image of Saint Michael defeating the dragon. This image belongs to the dragon itself and is used to deceive people into idolatry. A Roman persecutor with wings: the Roman god Mars under another name.
If Deuteronomy 19:21 orders the elimination of evil and Matthew 5:38–39 orders its tolerance, it is not because God sent Jesus to contradict it; it is because Rome contradicted God by adulterating Jesus’ message.
This does not imply validating every ancient law, since even there just laws are found mixed with unjust ones. If Rome had the texts it persecuted in its hands, there is no reason to believe that it preserved either the ancient or the new texts intact.
Michael preaches resisting evil with an eye for an eye. I am here to defeat you through resistance. I resist evil.
After reading Isaiah 63:3–5, Isaiah 11:1–5, and Revelation 19:11–19, the rider on the white horse, faithful and just, appears as a warrior who repays. There, the love of the enemy is not preached, but rather the principle of an eye for an eye.
«
«Walking on the edge of death along the dark path, but looking for the light, interpreting the lights projected on the mountains so as not to make a false step, to avoid death. █
Night was falling on the main road.
A blanket of darkness covered the winding path that wound through the mountains.
He did not walk aimlessly.
His goal was freedom, but the journey had only just begun.
With his body numb from the cold and his stomach empty for days,
he had no company but the elongated shadow cast by the headlights of the trucks that roared beside him,
advancing without stopping, indifferent to his presence.
Every step was a challenge,
every curve a new trap from which he had to emerge unscathed.
For seven nights and mornings,
he was forced to advance along the thin yellow line of a narrow road with just two lanes,
while trucks, buses and trailers whizzed by just inches from his body.
In the darkness, the deafening roar of engines enveloped him,
and the lights of trucks coming from behind cast their glow on the mountain in front of him.
At the same time, other trucks approached in the opposite direction,
forcing him to decide in fractions of a second
whether to pick up the pace or remain still in his precarious crossing,
where every movement meant the difference between life and death.
Hunger was a beast that devoured him from the inside,
but the cold was no less merciless.
In the sierra, the early hours of the morning were invisible claws that penetrated to the bones.
The wind enveloped him with its icy breath,
as if it wanted to extinguish the last spark of life that remained to him.
He took refuge where he could,
sometimes under a bridge,
other times in a corner of concrete that offered him a minimum of shelter.
But the rain was unforgiving.
Water seeped into his torn clothes,
sticking to his skin and stealing what little warmth he still had.
The trucks continued their march,
and he, stubbornly hoping that someone would feel sorry,
raised his hand, waiting for a gesture of humanity.
But the drivers drove on.
Some with looks of contempt,
others simply ignoring him, as if he were a ghost.
Every now and then, a compassionate soul would stop and offer him a quick ride,
but they were few.
Most saw him as a nuisance,
a shadow on the road,
someone not worth helping.
On one of those endless nights,
desperation drove him to search for food among the scraps left by travelers.
He was not ashamed to admit it:
he fought for food with pigeons,
snatching pieces of hardened biscuits before they could make them disappear.
It was an unequal fight,
but he was determined:
he was not willing to kneel before any image,
nor to accept any man as ‘only lord and savior’.
He was not willing to please those sinister individuals
who had already kidnapped him three times over religious differences,
who with their slanders had led him to walk that yellow line.
At another time, a kind man offered him a piece of bread and a drink.
A small gesture,
but in his pain,
that kindness was a balm.
But indifference was the norm.
When he asked for help,
many would walk away,
as if they feared that his misery was contagious.
Sometimes, a simple ‘no’ was enough to extinguish all hope,
but on other occasions, contempt was reflected in cold words or empty looks.
He didn’t understand how they could ignore someone who could barely stand,
how they could watch a man collapse without batting an eyelid.
And yet, he kept going.
Not because he had the strength,
but because he had no other choice.
He continued down the road,
leaving behind him miles of asphalt,
nights without rest and days without food.
Adversity hit him with everything it had,
but he resisted.
Because deep down,
even in the most absolute desperation,
the spark of survival still burned within him,
fueled by the desire for freedom and justice.
Psalm 118:17
‘I will not die, but I will live to proclaim the works of Jehovah.
18 Jehovah has chastened me severely, but He has not given me over to death.’
Psalm 41:4
‘I said, ‘Jehovah, have mercy on me
and heal me, for I confess with repentance that I have sinned against You.»
Job 33:24-25
‘God will have mercy on him and say, ‘Deliver him from going down to the pit; I have found a ransom;
25 his flesh shall become fresher than in childhood, and he shall return to the days of his youth.»
Psalm 16:8
‘I have set Jehovah always before me;
because He is at my right hand, I will not be shaken.’
Psalm 16:11
‘You will show me the path of life;
in Your presence, there is fullness of joy;
at Your right hand, there are pleasures forevermore.’
Matthew 7:14 For small is the gate and narrow the way that leads to life, and few are those who find it.
Leviticus 21:13 He shall take a virgin as his wife. 14 He shall not take a widow, a divorced woman, a disgraced woman, or a prostitute, but he shall take a virgin as his wife from among his own people, 15 so that he will not profane his offspring among his people; for I, the Lord, am the one who sanctifies them.
Isaiah 51:7 Listen to me, you who know righteousness, you people in whose hearts is my law: Do not fear the reproach of men, nor be dismayed by their insults. 8 For the moth will eat them up like a garment, and the worm will devour them like wool; but my righteousness will stand forever, and my salvation through all generations.
Psalm 119:1 Blessed are those who are consistent in their way, who walk according to the law of Jehovah.
Deuteronomy 19:18 The judges shall investigate thoroughly, and if that witness is found to be false and has falsely accused his brother, 19 then you shall do to him as he intended to do to his brother, and you shall purge the evil from among you. 20 Those who remain shall hear and be afraid, and shall no longer commit such wickedness among you. 21 You shall show him no pity; life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot.
Psalm 119:34 Give me understanding, and I will keep your law, and obey it with all my heart.
Daniel 12:3 Those who are wise will shine like the brightness of the heavens, and those who lead many to righteousness, like the stars for ever and ever.
Psalm 41:11-12
‘By this, I will know that You are pleased with me:
if my enemy does not triumph over me.
Micah 7:10 And my enemy shall see it, and shame shall cover her; she who said to me, ‘Where is Jehovah your God?’ My eyes shall see her; now she shall be trampled down like mud in the streets.
Psalms 41:12 As for me, You uphold me in my integrity
and set me in Your presence forever.’
Revelation 11:4
‘These witnesses are the two olive trees and the two lampstands standing before the God of the earth.’
Isaiah 11:2
‘The Spirit of Jehovah shall rest upon him:
the Spirit of wisdom and understanding, the Spirit of counsel and might, the Spirit of knowledge and the fear of Jehovah’
I made the mistake of defending the faith in the Bible, but out of ignorance. However, now I see that it is not the guiding book of the religion that Rome persecuted, but of the one it created to please itself with celibacy. That’s why they preached a Christ who doesn’t marry a woman, but rather His church, and angels who, despite having male names, do not look like men (draw your own conclusions). These figures are akin to the false saints—plaster-statue kissers—and similar to the Greco-Roman gods because, in fact, they are the same pagan gods under different names.
What they preach is a message incompatible with the interests of true saints. Therefore, this is my penance for that unintentional sin. By denying one false religion, I deny them all. And when I finish doing my penance, then God will forgive me and bless me with her, with that special woman I need. Because, although I don’t believe in the entire Bible, I do believe in what seems right and consistent to me within it; the rest is slander from the Romans.
Proverbs 28:13
‘He who covers his sins will not prosper, but whoever confesses and forsakes them will have mercy from the Lord.’
Proverbs 18:22
‘He who finds a wife finds a treasure and receives favor from the Lord.’
I seek the Lord’s favor embodied in that special woman.
She must be as the Lord commands that she be.
If this upsets you, it is because you have lost:
Leviticus 21:14
‘A widow, or a divorced woman, or a defiled woman, or a prostitute, he shall not marry these, but he shall marry a virgin from his own people.’
To me, she is glory:
1 Corinthians 11:7
‘Woman is the glory of man.’
Glory is victory, and I will find it with the power of light. Therefore, even though I don’t know her yet, I have named her: Light Victory.
And I nicknamed my web pages ‘UFOs’ because they travel at the speed of light, reaching corners of the world and shooting out rays of truth that strike down the slanderers. With the help of my web pages, I will find her, and she will find me.
When she finds me and I find her, I will tell her this:
‘You have no idea how many programming algorithms I had to devise to find you. You can’t imagine all the difficulties and adversaries I faced to find you, my Light of Victory.
I faced death itself many times:
Even a witch pretended to be you. Imagine, she told me she was the light, despite her slanderous behavior. She slandered me like no one else, but I defended myself like no one else to find you. You are a being of light; that’s why we were made for each other!
Now let’s get out of this damn place…
So this is my story. I know she will understand me, and so will the righteous.
Isaiah 51:6 Lift up your eyes to the heavens, and look down upon the earth; for the heavens shall vanish away like smoke, and the earth shall grow old like a garment, and its inhabitants shall perish in like manner; but my salvation shall be forever, and my righteousness shall not perish.
Psalms 16:11
‘You will show me the path of life;
in your presence there is fullness of joy;
at your right hand are pleasures forevermore.’
Matthew 7:13-14 Enter through the narrow gate; for wide is the gate and broad is the way that leads to destruction, and many are those who enter through it; for narrow is the gate and difficult is the way that leads to life, and few are those who find it.
Leviticus 21:13 He shall take a virgin as his wife. 14 He shall not take a widow, or a divorced woman, or one who has been defiled, or a prostitute; but he shall take a virgin of his own people as his wife, 15 so that he may not profane his offspring among his people; for I, the LORD, am the one who sanctifies them.
Psalms 118:20 This is the gate of the LORD; the righteous shall enter through it.
Proverbs 19:14 House and riches are an inheritance from fathers, but a prudent wife is from the LORD.
Daniel 12:13 But as for you, Daniel, go your way until the end; you shall rest, and then you shall rise to receive your inheritance at the end of the days.
Daniel 12:9 He replied, ‘Go your way, Daniel, for these words are closed up and sealed until the time of the end.’
Revelation 10:5-7 And the angel whom I saw standing on the sea and on the earth lifted up his hand to heaven, 6 and swore by him who lives forever and ever, who created heaven and the things in it, and the earth and the things in it, and the sea and the things in it, that there would be no more delay, 7 but in the days of the voice of the seventh angel, when he is about to sound the trumpet, the mystery of God will be fulfilled, as he declared to his servants the prophets.
Daniel 12:7 And I heard the man clothed in linen, who was above the waters of the river; he raised his right hand and his left hand toward heaven and swore by him who lives forever that it would be for a time, times, and half a time. And when the shattering of the power of the holy people is completed, all these things shall be fulfilled.
And when I find her, I will say to her: ‘Thank you for finding me, virgin of the gate, come, embrace me, and let me give you a kiss on the mouth…’
I have been a computer programmer, I like logic, in Turbo Pascal I created a program capable of producing basic algebra formulas at random, similar to the formula below. In the following document in .PDF you can download the code of the program, this is proof that I’m not stupid, that’s why the conclusions of my research should be taken seriously. https://ntiend.me/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/math21.pdf
If L+44=00 then L=-44
«Cupid is condemned to hell along with the other pagan gods (The fallen angels for their rebellion against justice, sent to eternal punishment). █
Quoting these passages does not mean defending the entire Bible. If 1 John 5:19 says that “the whole world is under the power of the evil one,” but rulers swear on the Bible, then the Devil rules with them. If the Devil rules with them, then fraud also rules with them. Therefore, the Bible contains part of that fraud, camouflaged among truths. By connecting those truths, we can expose their deceptions. Righteous people need to know these truths so that, if they have been deceived by lies added to the Bible or other similar books, they can free themselves from them.
Daniel 12:7 And I heard the man clothed in linen, who was above the waters of the river, when he raised his right hand and his left hand to heaven and swore by Him who lives forever that it shall be for a time, times, and half a time. And when the power of the holy people is completely shattered, all these things shall be finished.
Considering that ‘Devil’ means ‘Slanderer,’ it is natural to expect that the Roman persecutors, being the adversaries of the saints, later bore false witness against the saints and their messages. Thus, they themselves are the Devil, and not an intangible entity that enters and exits people, as they made us believe precisely with passages like Luke 22:3 (“Then Satan entered Judas…”), Mark 5:12-13 (the demons entering the pigs), and John 13:27 (“After the morsel, Satan entered him”).
This is my purpose: to help righteous people not waste their power believing in the lies of impostors who have adulterated the original message, which never asked anyone to kneel before anything or pray to anything that had ever been visible.
It is no coincidence that in this image, promoted by the Roman Church, Cupid appears alongside other pagan gods. They have given the names of the true saints to these false gods, but look at how these men dress and how they wear their long hair. All this goes against faithfulness to God’s laws because it is a sign of rebellion, a sign of the fallen angels (Deuteronomy 22:5).
The serpent, the devil, or Satan (the slanderer) in hell (Isaiah 66:24, Mark 9:44). Matthew 25:41: “Then he will also say to those on his left: ‘Depart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire that has been prepared for the devil and his angels’.” Hell: the eternal fire prepared for the serpent and his angels (Revelation 12:7-12), for having combined truths with heresies in the Bible, the Quran, the Torah, and for having created false forbidden gospels that they called apocryphal, to give credibility to lies in the false sacred books, all in rebellion against justice.
Book of Enoch 95:6: “Woe to you, false witnesses and to those who weigh the price of injustice, for you will perish suddenly!” Book of Enoch 95:7: “Woe to you, unjust ones who persecute the righteous, for you yourselves will be handed over and persecuted because of that injustice, and the burden of your guilt will fall upon you!” Proverbs 11:8: “The righteous is delivered from trouble, and the wicked comes in his place.” Proverbs 16:4: “The Lord has made all things for Himself, even the wicked for the day of doom.”
Book of Enoch 94:10: “Unjust ones, I say to you that He who created you will overthrow you; upon your ruin, God will have no mercy, but rather, God will rejoice in your destruction.” Satan and his angels in hell: the second death. They deserve it for lying against Christ and His faithful disciples, accusing them of being the authors of Rome’s blasphemies in the Bible, such as love for the devil (the enemy).
Isaiah 66:24: “And they shall go out and look upon the corpses of the men who have rebelled against me; for their worm shall never die, nor shall their fire be quenched, and they shall be abhorrent to all flesh.” Mark 9:44: “Where their worm does not die, and the fire is never quenched.” Revelation 20:14: “Then Death and Hades were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death: the lake of fire.”
Word of Satan: ‘Whoever turns wolves into sheep teaches that the strength of the just is superior to the cunning of the unjust.’
Word of Zeus (Satan): ‘I bless the crowd who believes I walked on the sea without ever having seen it; thanks to them, my image sails over that sea of heads that carry it without having any idea who I am. And my prophets, of course… they do not need evidence either: speaking is enough for them, and they are believed.’
The flattering politician and the false prophet rely on lies dressed as tradition; the righteous combats them, because his mission is not to please everyone, but to protect the righteous.
They say it is for the homeland, but it is for a government that never defended you. And the one who defends the people does not send them to die for foreign causes.
Idol worship and saint veneration are the antechamber to blind obedience that leads to the battlefield.
They declare war from desks, others pay with their lives.
Word of Satan: «Convince them that denouncing evil is judging, that only God should judge and that they should not do so; convince them that remaining silent in the face of the evil committed by the enemy is loving the enemy and that this is a divine commandment. Thus I will get them to love me as long as no one denounces me for having adulterated the divine commandment.»
The serpent cannot endure righteousness; that’s why it wants you to bend and kiss the feet of its false gods.
Word of Zeus: ‘I bless the crowd that believes I walked on the sea just because they were told so; their stupidity holds my image above an ocean of hollow heads unable even to know whom they carry. And my prophets… parasites fattened by ignorance: they vomit garbage, and the waters —the same ones where Babylon sits laughing at them— roar in applause while emptying their pockets. That is why my prophets lift their voices in gratitude: ‘Thank you for the economic miracle, Lord Zeus; without the gullibility of these fools we would never live so well. Even governments bow to us in your name’.’
The coward uses patriots as a shield, but the wise man does not allow himself to be used.
DE NACHTMERRIE VAN DE BIJBELSE APOLOGET https://purifying-the-message.blogspot.com/2026/08/de-nachtmerrie-van-de-bijbelse-apologet.html
Кто несёт ответственность за зло — ‘Сатана’ или человек, совершающий зло? https://gabriels.work/2026/07/10/idi09fc/
The statue promises nothing. Whoever uses it to promise is already lying. Word of Satan: «If they manage to free themselves from one dogma, give them another; what matters is not what they believe, but that they need someone to tell them what to believe.» It does not hold up in any way.»
GABRIELS.WORK 