The Rescue of the Chosen: A Critique of the Religious and Political System. (Video language:Japanese) /230/ https://youtu.be/5xzIfNXrD7k,
Day 223
«Show your true power» — Zeus challenges Gabriel. (Video language:Polish) /176/ https://youtu.be/CshBDp3EUew
«An ancient god of the Roman Empire hidden in labels
History demonstrates that the victors of a war impose their religion.
You will understand this at the end.
1 Corinthians 11:1–16.
Paul says: ‘Imitate me, as I imitate Jesus.’
In that same passage, Paul states that it is dishonorable for a man to have long hair.
Therefore, Paul would not imitate something that he himself disapproves of.
From this, it follows that Jesus did not have long hair.
The image disseminated and attributed to Jesus does not depict the Jesus whom Paul imitated.
Now let us think.
What gods did Rome worship in the time of Jesus?
Rome worshipped Zeus, also called Jupiter.
Then the question arises:
why does the image attributed to Jesus look so much like Jupiter?
The God of Jesus is the God of Moses.
And according to Deuteronomy 4, God did not show Himself in any form, precisely to prevent idolatry.
So why is God preached as having become man
and why is it demanded that he be worshipped?
Hebrews 1:6 commands the worship of a man.
This is very suspicious.
Furthermore, it contradicts the exclusive worship of Yahweh expressed in Psalm 97:7.
Rome persecuted Jesus and persecuted the saints.
Did it really respect the message it persecuted?
Did Rome abandon its god…
or did it merely change his name
on the plaque of its sculptures?
When Rome persecuted Jesus and his followers,
Rome considered itself victorious.
And victors do not learn from the defeated: they redefine them.
Revelation 13:7 says that it was allowed to wage war against the saints and conquer them,
and that it was given authority over every tribe, people, language, and nation.
If injustice did not reign in the world
and if there were no global interconnectedness that allows dominant religions to be imposed,
that time would not have arrived yet.
Simulated dialogue:
Zeus asks to be imitated, to be accepted as the truth and the life.
Paul responds:
‘I do not imitate that man. Long hair is a disgrace for a man. The truth is not a man or some pagan god; the truth is coherent information, and life is not limited to a single creature.’
Zeus replies: ‘Paul… you denied me three times.’
Jesus says:
‘Paul, you defended my honor.
Rome slandered you.
You never said ‘let every man be subject to all authority.’
If you had said that, they would not have beheaded you.
Did you notice that Rome never quoted me denouncing idols when it spoke about me?
It silenced me for doing so, for not worshipping the beast or its image,
just as happened to you.
With this I am not saying that the guidance is what was called the ‘Old Testament’
or that the manipulation is found only in what was called the ‘New Testament.’
He who hates the tree hates its root.
If 1 John 2:1 says that Jesus is righteous,
and Proverbs 29:27 says that the righteous hate the wicked,
then the teaching attributed to Jesus in Matthew 5:44
could not have been Jesus’ teaching.
When a message is incoherent or contradictory, there is no pure truth: there is manipulation.
This does not depend on dates attributed to the writings,
but on who had the texts
and the power to decide what was ‘canonical.’
It was not prophets who decided that,
but Roman emperors
capable of erasing or rewriting even older texts
to impose an imperial narrative.
If we apply this saying to the Roman Empire and its gods…
Luke 11:21 When a strong man, fully armed, guards his palace, his possessions are in peace. 22 But when someone stronger than he comes and overcomes him, he takes away all the weapons in which he trusted, and divides the spoils.
What do I see here? The god Mars taking a saint’s name that does not belong to him: Michael.
This through the priests who worship his image.
And here I see the god Zeus taking an attribution belonging to a saint that does not belong to him: Christ.
This through the priests who worship his image.
Intellect is a force…
And now the final question:
If Jesus had short hair,
who do you see on that cross?
I consider these words to be prophecies:
Proverbs 11:8 The righteous are delivered from trouble, but the wicked enter in their place.
Daniel 12:1 = At that time Michael (the righteous) will arise…, and there will be a time of distress such as never occurred from the beginning of nations until then; but at that time all those who are found written in the book (the righteous) will be delivered.
«
«In Mark 3:29, the ‘sin against the Holy Spirit’ is warned as unforgivable. However, history and the practices of Rome reveal a shocking moral inversion: the truly unforgivable sin, according to their dogma, is questioning the credibility of their Bible. Meanwhile, serious crimes such as the killing of innocents have been ignored or justified under the same authority that claimed to be infallible. This post examines how this ‘unique sin’ was constructed and how the institution used it to protect its power while justifying historical injustices.
In purposes contrary to Christ is the Antichrist, if you read Isaiah 11 you will see the mission of Christ in his second life, and it is not to favor everyone but only the righteous, but the Antichrist is inclusive, despite being unjust, he wants to climb onto Noah’s Ark, despite being unjust he wants to leave Sodom with Lot… Happy are those to whom these words are not offensive. He who is not offended by this message, that one is righteous, congratulations to him: Christianity was created by the Romans, only a mind friendly to celibacy, proper of Greek and Roman leaders, enemies of the ancient Jews, could conceive a message like the one that says: ‘These are the ones who did not defile themselves with women, for they remained virgins. They follow the Lamb wherever he goes. They were purchased from among mankind and offered as firstfruits to God and to the Lamb’ in Revelation 14:4, or a message like this one which is similar: ‘For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like the angels of God in heaven,’ in Matthew 22:30, both messages sound as if they came from a Roman Catholic priest, and not from a prophet of God who seeks this blessing for himself: He who finds a wife finds what is good and receives favor from the Lord (Proverbs 18:22), Leviticus 21:14 A widow, or a divorced woman, or a woman who has been defiled, or a prostitute, he shall not marry; but he shall take as a wife a virgin from his own people.
I am not Christian; I am henotheist. I believe in one supreme God above all, and I believe that several created gods exist—some faithful, others deceivers. I only pray to the supreme God. But since I was indoctrinated from childhood in Roman Christianity, I believed in its teachings for many years. I applied those ideas even when common sense told me otherwise. For example—so to speak—I turned the other cheek to a woman who had already struck me on one. A woman who, at first, acted like a friend, but then, without justification, began treating me as if I were her enemy, with strange and contradictory behavior. Influenced by the Bible, I believed she had become an enemy because of some spell, and that what she needed was prayer to return to being the friend she had once shown herself to be (or pretended to be). But in the end, everything only got worse. As soon as I had the chance to dig deeper, I uncovered the lie and felt betrayed in my faith. I came to understand that many of those teachings did not come from the true message of justice, but from Roman Hellenism infiltrated into the Scriptures. And I confirmed I had been deceived. That’s why I now denounce Rome and its fraud. I do not fight against God, but against the slanders that have corrupted His message. Proverbs 29:27 declares that the righteous hates the wicked. However, 1 Peter 3:18 claims that the righteous died for the wicked. Who can believe that someone would die for those he hates? To believe it is to have blind faith; it is to accept incoherence. And when blind faith is preached, could it be because the wolf wants his prey not to see the deception?
Jehovah will shout like a mighty warrior: ‘I will take vengeance on My enemies!’
(Revelation 15:3 + Isaiah 42:13 + Deuteronomy 32:41 + Nahum 1:2–7)
And what about the so-called ‘love for the enemy’ that, according to some Bible verses, the Son of Jehovah supposedly preached—claiming we should imitate His Father’s perfection through universal love? (Mark 12:25–37, Psalm 110:1–6, Matthew 5:38–48)
That is a lie spread by the enemies of both Father and Son.
A false doctrine born from mixing Hellenism with sacred words.»
«
Exodus 20:4–5 ‘You shall not bow down before the image of anything that exists in heaven (birds, the moon, the sun, etc.), on earth (men, serpents, golden calves, pyrite (pyrite is a mineral that has the shape of a cube), etc.), or in the water (fish, etc.).’ Leviticus 26:1 ‘You shall not make idols or carved images, nor erect statues, nor place painted stones in the land to worship them; for I am the LORD your God.’ When a person kneels before an image to pray or show respect to it, then that person worships that image; the image becomes their idol. That is why God approved of King Hezekiah destroying the bronze serpent that God commanded Moses to make, since when God commanded specific images to be made for specific purposes, God never commanded that those images receive worship. 2 Kings 18:4 ‘He removed the high places, smashed the images, cut down the Asherah poles, and destroyed the bronze serpent that Moses had made, because up to that time the Israelites had been burning incense to it; and it was called a bronze thing.’ The Bible and the Quran share a common lie that reveals their Roman origin. The Bible says that the angel Gabriel announced that Jesus would be born of a virgin woman to fulfill a prophecy of Isaiah, and the Quran also says that the angel Gabriel announced the virgin birth of Jesus. But that is not true, because Isaiah prophesied the birth of a faithful king who broke the bronze serpent that Moses had made, because that creature was being worshiped. Furthermore, Isaiah never said that the woman would remain a virgin even after becoming pregnant in order to give birth to King Hezekiah, son of Ahaz; God was with Hezekiah, and together with his faithful servants, therefore Hezekiah was Immanuel (read Isaiah 7 and connect it with 2 Kings 18). a) They worship statues or pray to the names of one or more creatures. b) The virgin birth of Jesus is a common belief in Christianity and Islam. Islam c) They worship a cube. Judaism d) They worship a wall. Christianity — Islam — Judaism e) These religions cause people to pray to creatures or bow down before objects made by humans in order to humiliate themselves before them, and that is what the prophet Isaiah condemned (Isaiah 2:8–9). Is it necessary to obtain archaeological evidence of the deception when we already have logical proof? The so-called sacred messages are not coherent. How can the same God protect a murderer from the death penalty in Genesis 4:15 and then condemn murderers to death in Numbers 33:35? If Rome killed those whom it persecuted, and those whom it persecuted belonged to a religion that Rome did not accept, one thing is clear to me: that religion could not have been a new one that denied the law and the prophecies of the Jewish people, but rather the same religion that already existed before Jesus. In fact, according to the Bible, Jesus came to confirm the law and the prophets. If Judaism essentially contains that, why not assert that Jesus’ religion was actually Judaism? Although not modern Judaism, which I will substantiate: as I have shown, treating everyone well because we would like to be treated that way and loving one’s enemy do not align with either the law or the prophets. However, according to the Bible, Jesus said that these teachings summarize the law and the prophets. Nevertheless, I have already shown that these doctrines not only contradict the eye-for-an-eye principle of the law and the God who hates his enemies and loves his friends as described by the prophets, but also originate from the Greek sage Cleobulus of Lindos. If Rome was capable of passing off the teachings of a Greek as those of the faithful king of the Jews, what assures us that it did not also alter the texts of what Rome called the Old Testament? And if those texts coincide with what we know today as Judaism, should we trust that it is the authentic Judaism that was persecuted by Rome? //756
Word of the serpent: ‘Did God really say, ‘Do not eat that fruit’ (Genesis 3:1), nor the flesh of the pig (Deuteronomy 14:8)?… Roman scribe, pass off as the word of God:… nothing that God made is bad, if it is received with thanksgiving (1 Timothy 4:1–6).’ Word of Satan: ‘Servant of my empire, write also: ‘The whole world lies under the power of the evil one’ (1 John 5:19), and so that they submit to me, add: ‘Let every person be subject to the governing authorities; for there is no authority except from God’ (Romans 13:1)… for God has placed me so that I may never be overthrown (Revelation 13:5).’ Word of Satan: ‘Roman, now write that Jesus rose from the dead and that His return will be from the clouds, so that people wait for an impossible justice while I perpetuate myself with your empire in power, and love for their enemy is preached so that they do not demand back their gold when we steal it from them.’ //60
«
1 La parabola inedita: La parabola del messaggero infiltrato https://144k.xyz/2026/10/04/la-parabola-inedita-la-parabola-del-messaggero-infiltrato/ 2 Что означает этот повторяющийся сон? Тот же сон спустя 10 лет. ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot и Perplexity анализируют этот сон. https://bestiadn.com/2026/08/23/sue9/ 3 Me Yunana ya shaƙa a cikin kifin whale? Babban kifi ko babban yaudara? https://penademuerteya.com/2026/06/10/idi59jb/ 4 ChatGPT y Gemini opinan sobre MATH21.PAS un programa elaborado en Turbo Pascal 7 por José Carlos Galindo Hinostroza, un programador amateur, un ex programador en RPG/AS400 https://144k.xyz/2026/06/03/math21/ 5 Heeft Jezus, terwijl hij aan het kruis hing, zijn vijanden vervloekt en hen honden genoemd? https://purifying-the-message.blogspot.com/2026/10/heeft-jezus-terwijl-hij-aan-het-kruis.html
«In football, would you pass the ball to the opposing team? There is clear infiltration in the texts.
This is like football: the opponent pretends to be a teammate and tells you: ‘Here, pass me the ball’. That is an infiltrated text: it asks you to support the interests of the opposing team.
In this video, I expose an example of that infiltration.
Before, I knew nothing about these subjects, but due to circumstances in life, I began to investigate. When I looked into the meaning of the word ‘angel’, I discovered that it means ‘messenger’.
So, when I read that some angels of good fight against some angels of evil, knowing this, I interpret it as a war between messages, a war between messengers: the messengers of good defending justice and the messengers of evil defending impunity.
That is what I see.
Now, in Revelation 12:7, a war between messengers is described: Michael and his angels fighting against the dragon and his angels.
At the end, something key is mentioned: that the dragon, or Satan, the demon, or the devil, whatever you want to call the evil one, he and his angels lose.
But something else is stated emphatically. It says that they deceive the whole world.
The text says something like this: ‘And the great dragon was thrown down, the one who deceives the whole world’.
That makes me think: throughout the world there are dominant books belonging to the main religions, such as Christianity, Islam, and Judaism.
Therefore, if the devil or Satan deceives the whole world, it is logical to suppose that his deception has infiltrated what humanity considers sacred texts.
It is logical. Otherwise, he would not be deceiving the whole world.
Now there is a detail about this question of the opposing sides that I want to clarify.
It does not seem possible to me that, if Jesus belongs to the side of the good, he would have taught the good to love the side of the evil.
It makes no sense.
It would be as if Jesus said to the angel Michael: ‘Fight the dragon while loving him. Love his army. Do good to him. Turn the other cheek’.
That does not fit.
For that reason, I consider that loving the enemy is not part of the true teaching, but rather something that the enemy of the true message preached.
I think that the enemy of the authentic message sought the submission of his victims and, in accordance with that purpose, adulterated the message.
Sometimes some people try to justify this idea by saying that turning the other cheek or loving the aggressor serves to break the cycle of violence.
But that does not hold up in reality.
Evil does not stop because the victim turns the other cheek. The wicked person continues attacking the just person, regardless of whether the latter is peaceful or does not resist.
The only way in which lasting justice and peace can be achieved is through the victory of the just, and this cannot be achieved if one loves those who are the source of injustice.
The war between good and evil is a war of messages. Words have consequences, and the wicked do not want to suffer the consequences of their actions: just punishment. They prefer the rhetoric of a just person suffering unjustly for the wrongdoing of the wicked. Read Proverbs 29:27 and contrast it with 1 Peter 3:18. If the first passage says that the just person hates the wicked person—which seems obvious to me—does it make sense to you that a just person would give his life out of love for the wicked? You will see that there is a great inconsistency. I hope this makes you notice and recognize that there is clear infiltration in the texts.
«
«The Pope and the Enemy of the Devil: The Strong Man.
Matthew 24:1 As Jesus went out and departed from the temple, His disciples came to Him to show Him the buildings of the temple. 2 And Jesus said to them, ‘Do you see all these things? Truly I say to you, not one stone shall be left here upon another that shall not be thrown down.’ 3 And as He sat on the Mount of Olives, the disciples came to Him privately, saying, ‘Tell us, when shall these things be? And what shall be the sign of Your coming, and of the end of the age?’ … 7 ‘For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom; and there shall be pestilences, and famines, and earthquakes in various places. 8 All these are the beginning of sorrows.’ … 21 ‘For then there shall be great tribulation, such as has not been since the beginning of the world until now, nor ever shall be.’
Daniel 12:1 At that time Michael shall stand up, the great prince who stands watch over the children of your people; and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that time. But at that time your people shall be delivered, everyone who is found written in the book.
If they bore false witness against you and did not trust your loyalty, isn’t it absurd to offer the other cheek by giving new opportunities? I have the right to choose not to offer the other cheek, and no one has the right to slander me for that.Love and the Right to Choose Not to Offer the Other Cheek.
Teachings of Cleobulus of Lindos, a Greek thinker of the 6th century BC: ‘Do good to your friends and enemies, because in this way you will preserve the former and may be able to win over the latter.’, ‘Any man, at any moment in life, can be your friend or your enemy, depending on how you behave toward him.’
Teachings of Jesus?
Matthew 5:44: ‘…do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who insult you and persecute you…’
Matthew 7:12: ‘Therefore, whatever you want men to do to you, do also to them, for this is the Law and the Prophets.’
The Law and the Prophets command that each person be treated according to what he deserves; according to the Law, the wicked do not deserve good treatment:
Deuteronomy 19:18: ‘And the judges shall make diligent inquiry; and if the witness is a false witness, and has testified falsely against his brother, then you shall do to him as he thought to have done to his brother; so you shall remove the evil from among you.’
And if we speak of prophets, according to the prophet Nahum:
Nahum 1:2: ‘The Lord is a jealous and avenging God; the Lord is full of vengeance and wrath. He takes vengeance on His adversaries and reserves wrath for His enemies.’
Did Jesus really present God as an example for abandoning the principle of ‘an eye for an eye’?
Matthew 5:45: ‘…that you may be sons of your Father in heaven, who makes His sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust.’
According to Genesis 19:23–24: ‘The sun had risen upon Sodom,’ upon the wicked (Genesis 13:13); shortly afterward, God rained fire and brimstone upon the wicked…
Do not ask whether Jesus spoke of a different God; ask why Rome made it so.
Pope Francis called ‘friends of the devil’ those who spend their lives accusing the Church.
https : // www . france24 . com / es / 20190220-acusando-iglesia-amigos-diablo-papa-francisco
Isn’t it being a friend of the Devil to speak against God in order to protect the wicked? Isn’t it being a friend of the Devil to present the idolatry of church images as ‘mere veneration’ of images? Pope Francis: ‘God loves every person, even the worst one.’ December 24, 2019. Pope Francis celebrated the traditional Christmas Eve Mass this Tuesday in St. Peter’s Basilica, and in his homily he spoke about God’s love…
Psalm 11:6 Upon the wicked He will rain calamities; fire and brimstone and a scorching wind shall be the portion of their cup. 7 For Jehovah is righteous, and He loves righteousness; the upright shall behold the face of Jehovah.
Psalm 5:4 For You are not a God who takes pleasure in wickedness; nor shall evil dwell with You. 5 The boastful shall not stand in Your sight; You hate all workers of iniquity. 6 You shall destroy those who speak falsehood; Jehovah abhors the bloodthirsty and deceitful man.
Luke 11:21 When a strong man, fully armed, guards his own palace, his possessions are safe.
22 But when one stronger than he comes against him and overcomes him, he takes away all the armor in which he trusted, and divides the spoils.
Proverbs 11:8 The righteous is delivered from tribulation, but the wicked takes his place.
Proverbs 11:10 When it goes well with the righteous, the city rejoices; but when the wicked perish, there is jubilation.
Exodus 20:13 You shall not murder.
Exodus 21:14 But if a man acts presumptuously against his neighbor and kills him deliberately, you shall take him from My altar, that he may die.
«
«The religion I defend is named justice. █
I will find her when she finds me, and she will believe what I say.
The Roman Empire has betrayed humanity by inventing religions to subjugate it. All institutionalized religions are false. All the sacred books of those religions contain frauds. However, there are messages that make sense. And there are others, missing, that can be deduced from the legitimate messages of justice. Daniel 12:1-13 — ‘The prince who fights for justice will rise to receive God’s blessing.’ Proverbs 18:22 — ‘A wife is the blessing God gives to a man.’ Leviticus 21:14 — ‘He must marry a virgin of his own faith, for she is from his own people, who will be set free when the righteous rise.’
📚 What is an institutionalized religion? An institutionalized religion is when a spiritual belief is transformed into a formal power structure, designed to control people. It ceases to be an individual search for truth or justice and becomes a system dominated by human hierarchies, serving political, economic, or social power. What is just, true, or real no longer matters. The only thing that matters is obedience. An institutionalized religion includes: Churches, synagogues, mosques, temples. Powerful religious leaders (priests, pastors, rabbis, imams, popes, etc.). Manipulated and fraudulent ‘official’ sacred texts. Dogmas that cannot be questioned. Rules imposed on people’s personal lives. Mandatory rites and rituals in order to ‘belong.’ This is how the Roman Empire, and later other empires, used faith to subjugate people. They turned the sacred into a business. And truth into heresy. If you still believe that obeying a religion is the same as having faith, you were lied to. If you still trust their books, you trust the same people who crucified justice. It’s not God speaking in his temples. It’s Rome. And Rome never stopped speaking. Wake up. He who seeks justice needs no permission. Nor an institution.
She will find me, the virgin woman will believe me.
( – – )
This is the wheat in the Bible that destroys the Roman tares in the Bible:
Revelation 19:11
Then I saw heaven opened, and there was a white horse; and the one sitting on it was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness, he judges and makes war.
Revelation 19:19
Then I saw the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies gathered together to make war against the one sitting on the horse and against his army.
Psalm 2:2-4
‘The kings of the earth set themselves up, and the rulers took counsel together against the Lord and against his anointed, saying:
‘Let us break their bonds apart and cast away their cords from us.’
He who sits in the heavens laughs; the Lord mocks them.’
Now, some basic logic: if the horseman fights for justice, but the beast and the kings of the earth fight against this horseman, then the beast and the kings of the earth are against justice. Therefore, they represent the deception of the false religions that rule with them.
The whore of Babylon, which is the false church made by Rome, has considered herself to be ‘the wife of the Lord’s anointed,’ but the false prophets of this idol-selling and flattering word-peddling organization do not share the personal goals of the Lord’s anointed and the true saints, because the ungodly leaders have chosen for themselves the path of idolatry, celibacy, or sacramentalizing unholy marriages in exchange for money. Their religious headquarters are full of idols, including false holy books, before which they bow down:
Isaiah 2:8-11
8 Their land is full of idols; they bow down to the work of their hands, to what their fingers have made.
9 So the man is humbled, and the man is brought low; do not forgive them.
10 Go into the rock, hide yourself in the dust from the terror of the LORD and from the splendor of his majesty.
11 The arrogance of human eyes will be brought low, and the pride of men will be humbled; the LORD alone will be exalted on that day.
Proverbs 19:14
House and wealth are an inheritance from fathers, but a prudent wife is from the LORD.
Leviticus 21:14
The priest of the LORD shall not marry a widow, nor a divorced woman, nor an unclean woman, nor a harlot; he shall take a virgin from his own people as a wife.
Revelation 1:6
And he has made us kings and priests to his God and Father; to him be glory and dominion forever.
1 Corinthians 11:7
The woman is the glory of man.
What does it mean in Revelation that the beast and the kings of the earth wage war on the rider of the white horse and his army?
The meaning is clear, the world leaders are hand in glove with the false prophets who are disseminators of the false religions that are dominant among the kingdoms of the earth, for obvious reasons, that includes Christianity, Islam, etc. These rulers are against justice and truth, which are the values defended by the rider of the white horse and his army loyal to God. As is evident, the deception is part of the false sacred books that these accomplices defend with the label of ‘Authorized Books of Authorized Religions’, but the only religion that I defend is justice, I defend the right of the righteous not to be deceived with religious deceptions.
Revelation 19:19 Then I saw the beast and the kings of the earth and their armies gathered together to make war against the rider on the horse and against his army.
Now some basic logic, if the horseman stands for justice, but the beast and the kings of the earth fight against this horseman, then the beast and the kings of the earth are against justice, therefore they stand for the deception of the false religions that rule with them.
This is my story:
José, a young man raised in Catholic teachings, experienced a series of events marked by complex relationships and manipulations. At 19, he began a relationship with Monica, a possessive and jealous woman. Although Jose felt that he should end the relationship, his religious upbringing led him to try to change her with love. However, Monica’s jealousy intensified, especially towards Sandra, a classmate who was making advances on Jose.
Sandra began harassing him in 1995 with anonymous phone calls, in which she made noises with the keyboard and hung up.
On one of those occasions, she revealed that she was the one calling, after Jose angrily asked in the last call: ‘Who are you?’ Sandra called him immediately, but in that call she said: ‘Jose, who am I?’ Jose, recognizing her voice, said to her: ‘You are Sandra,’ to which she replied: ‘You already know who I am.’ Jose avoided confronting her. During that time, Monica, obsessed with Sandra, threatened Jose with harming Sandra, which led Jose to protect Sandra and prolong his relationship with Monica, despite his desire to end it.
Finally, in 1996, Jose broke up with Monica and decided to approach Sandra, who had initially shown interest in him. When Jose tried to talk to her about his feelings, Sandra did not allow him to explain himself, she treated him with offensive words and he did not understand the reason. Jose chose to distance himself, but in 1997 he believed he had the opportunity to talk to Sandra, hoping that she would explain her change of attitude and be able to share the feelings that she had kept silent. On her birthday in July, he called her as he had promised a year earlier when they were still friends—something he couldn’t do in 1996 because he was with Monica. At the time, he used to believe that promises should never be broken (Matthew 5:34-37), though now he understands that some promises and oaths can be reconsidered if made in error or if the person no longer deserves them. As he finished greeting her and was about to hang up, Sandra desperately pleaded, ‘Wait, wait, can we meet?’ That made him think she had reconsidered and would finally explain her change in attitude, allowing him to share the feelings he had kept silent. However, Sandra never gave him clear answers, maintaining the intrigue with evasive and counterproductive attitudes.
Faced with this attitude, Jose decided not to look for her anymore. It was then that constant telephone harassment began. The calls followed the same pattern as in 1995 and this time were directed to the house of his paternal grandmother, where Jose lived. He was convinced that it was Sandra, since Jose had recently given Sandra his number. These calls were constant, morning, afternoon, night, and early morning, and lasted for months. When a family member answered, they did not hang up, but when José answered, the clicking of the keys could be heard before hanging up.
Jose asked his aunt, the owner of the telephone line, to request a record of incoming calls from the telephone company. He planned to use that information as evidence to contact Sandra’s family and express his concern about what she was trying to achieve with this behavior. However, his aunt downplayed his argument and refused to help. Strangely, no one in the house, neither his aunt nor his paternal grandmother, seemed to be outraged by the fact that the calls also occurred in the early morning, and they did not bother to look into how to stop them or identify the person responsible.
This had the strange appearance of orchestrated torture. Even when José asked his aunt to unplug the phone at night so he could sleep, she refused, arguing that one of her sons, who lived in Italy, could call at any moment (considering the six-hour time difference between the two countries). What made things even stranger was Monica’s fixation on Sandra, even though they hadn’t even met. Monica didn’t attend the high school where José and Sandra were enrolled, but she began to feel jealous of Sandra after finding a folder with one of José’s group projects. The folder listed the names of two women, including Sandra, but for some strange reason, Monica became fixated only on Sandra’s name.
Although José initially ignored Sandra’s phone calls, over time he relented and contacted Sandra again, influenced by biblical teachings that advised praying for those who persecuted him. However, Sandra manipulated him emotionally, alternating between insults and requests for him to keep looking for her. After months of this cycle, Jose discovered that it was all a trap. Sandra falsely accused him of sexual harassment, and as if that wasn’t bad enough, Sandra sent some criminals to beat up Jose.
That Tuesday, without José knowing it, Sandra had already set a trap for him.
Days before, José had told his friend Johan about the situation he was going through with Sandra. Johan also suspected that Sandra’s strange behavior might be due to some kind of witchcraft by Mónica. That Tuesday, José visited his old neighborhood where he had lived in 1995 and happened to run into Johan. After hearing more details about the situation, Johan recommended that José forget about Sandra and instead go out to a nightclub to meet women—perhaps he would find someone who could make him forget her. José thought it was a good idea.
So they got on a bus and headed toward the nightclub in downtown Lima. Coincidentally, the route of that bus passed near the IDAT institute. Just one block before reaching IDAT, José suddenly had the idea to get off for a moment to pay for a Saturday course he had enrolled in. He had managed to save some money for it by selling his computer and working for a week in a warehouse. However, he had been forced to quit because they exploited workers with 16-hour shifts while officially recording only 12, and if they refused to complete the week, they were threatened with not being paid at all.
So José turned to Johan and said, ‘I study here on Saturdays. Since we’re passing by, let’s get off for a bit, I’ll pay for my course, and then we’ll head to the nightclub.’
The moment José stepped off the bus, before even crossing the avenue, he was shocked to see Sandra standing right there on the corner of the institute. In disbelief, he told Johan, ‘Johan, I can’t believe it—Sandra is right there. She’s the girl I told you about, the one who acts so strangely. Wait for me here; I’m going to ask if she got the letter where I warned her about Mónica’s threats against her, and maybe she can finally explain what’s going on with her and what she wants from me with all her calls.’
Johan stayed back as José approached. But as soon as he started speaking—’Sandra, did you see the letters? Can you finally explain to me what’s going on with you?’—Sandra, without saying a word, gestured with her hand, signaling three thugs who had been hiding in different spots: one in the middle of the avenue, another behind Sandra, and another behind José.
The one standing behind Sandra stepped forward and said, ‘So you’re the sexual harasser who’s been bothering my cousin?’
José, caught off guard, responded, ‘What? Me, a harasser? On the contrary, she’s the one harassing me! If you read the letter, you’d see it’s about me trying to understand why she keeps calling me!’
Before he could react, one of the thugs grabbed him by the neck from behind and threw him to the ground. Then, together with the one who had claimed to be Sandra’s cousin, they started kicking him. Meanwhile, the third thug went through his pockets, robbing him. It was three against one—José, lying helpless on the pavement.
Luckily, his friend Johan jumped into the fight, managing to give José a chance to get up. But then the third thug picked up some rocks and started throwing them at both José and Johan.
The attack only stopped when a traffic officer intervened. The officer turned to Sandra and said, ‘If he’s harassing you, then file a complaint.’
Sandra, visibly nervous, quickly left, knowing full well that her accusation was false.
José, though deeply betrayed, did not go to the police. He had no way to prove the months of harassment he had suffered from Sandra. But beyond the shock of her betrayal, one question haunted him:
‘How did she already have this ambush set up when I never come to this place on Tuesday nights? I only come here to study on Saturday mornings.’
This made José suspect that Sandra wasn’t just an ordinary person—she might be a witch with some kind of supernatural power.
These events left a deep mark on Jose, who seeks justice and to expose those who manipulated him. In addition, he seeks to derail the advice in the Bible, such as: pray for those who insult you, because by following that advice, he fell into Sandra’s trap.
Jose’s testimony.
I am José Carlos Galindo Hinostroza, the author of the blog: https://gabriels.work
I was born in Peru, that photo is mine, it is from 1997, I was 22 years old.
At that time, I was entangled in the intrigues of Sandra Elizabeth, a former classmate from the IDAT institute. I was confused about what was happening to her (She harassed me in a very complex and extensive way to narrate in this image, but I narrate it at the bottom of this blog: and in this video:
). I did not rule out the possibility that Mónica Nieves, my ex-girlfriend, had done some witchcraft to her.
When searching for answers in the Bible, I read in Matthew 5:
‘ Pray for whoever insults you,’
And in those days, Sandra insulted me while telling me she didn’t know what was happening to her, that she wanted to continue being my friend, and that I should keep calling and looking for her again and again, and it went on like this for five months. In short, Sandra pretended to be possessed by something to keep me confused. The lies in the Bible made me believe that good people can behave evilly because of an evil spirit. That’s why the advice to pray for her didn’t seem so crazy to me—because before, Sandra pretended to be a friend, and I fell for her deception.
Thieves often use the strategy of pretending to have good intentions: To steal from stores, they pretend to be customers; to ask for tithes, they pretend to preach the word of God, but they preach that of Rome, etc., etc. Sandra Elizabeth pretended to be a friend, then pretended to be a friend in trouble looking for my help, but all to slander me and ambush me with three criminals, surely out of spite because a year earlier I rejected her advances since I was in love with Monica Nieves, to whom I was faithful. But Monica did not trust my fidelity and threatened to kill Sandra Elizabeth, which is why I broke up with Monica slowly, over eight months, so that Monica wouldn’t think it was because of Sandra. But this is how Sandra Elizabeth paid me back—with slander. She falsely accused me of sexually harassing her, and with that pretext, she ordered three criminals to beat me up—all in front of her.
I narrate all this in my blog and in my YouTube videos:
I do not wish for other righteous men to have bad experiences like I had, which is why I have created what you are reading. I know this will irritate unrighteous people like Sandra, but the truth is like the true gospel—it only favors the righteous.
The evil of José’s family overshadows Sandra’s evil:
José suffered a devastating betrayal by his own family, who not only refused to help him stop Sandra’s harassment but also falsely accused him of having a mental illness. His own relatives used these accusations as a pretext to kidnap and torture him, sending him twice to mental health institutions and a third time to a hospital.
It all began when José read Exodus 20:5 and stopped being Catholic. From that moment on, he became outraged by the Church’s dogmas and started protesting against its doctrines on his own. He also advised his relatives to stop praying to images and told them that he was praying for a friend (Sandra) who was apparently bewitched or possessed. José was under stress due to the harassment, but his relatives did not tolerate him exercising his freedom of religious expression. As a result, they destroyed his professional life, his health, and his reputation by locking him up in mental institutions where he was given sedatives.
Not only was he forcibly institutionalized, but after his release, he was forced to continue taking psychiatric medication under the threat of being locked up again. He fought to break free from those chains, and during the last two years of that injustice, with his programming career ruined, he was forced to work without pay at his uncle’s restaurant. That same uncle betrayed his trust by secretly drugging his meals with psychiatric pills. José only discovered the truth in 2007 thanks to a kitchen assistant named Lidia, who warned him about what was happening.
From 1998 to 2007, José lost nearly ten years of his youth due to his treacherous relatives. In hindsight, he realized that his mistake was defending the Bible to reject Catholicism, as his family never allowed him to read it. They committed this injustice knowing he had no financial resources to defend himself. When he finally broke free from the forced medication, he thought he had earned their respect. His maternal uncles and cousins even offered him a job, but years later, they betrayed him again with such hostility that he was forced to resign. This made him realize that he should never have forgiven them, as their bad intentions were clear.
From that moment on, he decided to study the Bible again, and in 2017, he began noticing its contradictions. Little by little, he understood why God had allowed his relatives to prevent him from defending the Bible in his youth. He discovered biblical inconsistencies and started exposing them in his blogs, where he also recounted the story of his faith and the suffering he endured at the hands of Sandra and, most of all, his own family.
For this reason, in December 2018, his mother attempted to kidnap him again with the help of corrupt police officers and a psychiatrist who issued a false certificate. They accused him of being a ‘dangerous schizophrenic’ to have him institutionalized again, but the attempt failed because he was not home. There were witnesses to the incident, and José had audio recordings, which he presented as evidence to the Peruvian authorities in his complaint, but it was dismissed.
His family knew perfectly well that he was not insane—he had a stable job, a child, and the mother of his child to take care of. However, despite knowing the truth, they attempted to kidnap him again using the same old false accusation. His own mother and other fanatical Catholic relatives led the attempt. Although his complaint was ignored by the Ministry, José exposes these truths in his blogs, making it clear that the evil of his family eclipses even that of Sandra.
Here is the evidence of the kidnappings using the slander of traitors:
‘This man is a schizophrenic who urgently needs psychiatric treatment and pills for life.’
I have been a computer programmer, I like logic, in Turbo Pascal I created a program capable of producing basic algebra formulas at random, similar to the formula below. In the following document in .PDF you can download the code of the program, this is proof that I’m not stupid, that’s why the conclusions of my research should be taken seriously. https://ntiend.me/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/math21.pdf
If T/9=6.646 then T=59.814 «Cupid is condemned to hell along with the other pagan gods (The fallen angels for their rebellion against justice, sent to eternal punishment). █
Quoting these passages does not mean defending the entire Bible. If 1 John 5:19 says that “the whole world is under the power of the evil one,” but rulers swear on the Bible, then the Devil rules with them. If the Devil rules with them, then fraud also rules with them. Therefore, the Bible contains part of that fraud, camouflaged among truths. By connecting those truths, we can expose their deceptions. Righteous people need to know these truths so that, if they have been deceived by lies added to the Bible or other similar books, they can free themselves from them.
Daniel 12:7 And I heard the man clothed in linen, who was above the waters of the river, when he raised his right hand and his left hand to heaven and swore by Him who lives forever that it shall be for a time, times, and half a time. And when the power of the holy people is completely shattered, all these things shall be finished.
Considering that ‘Devil’ means ‘Slanderer,’ it is natural to expect that the Roman persecutors, being the adversaries of the saints, later bore false witness against the saints and their messages. Thus, they themselves are the Devil, and not an intangible entity that enters and exits people, as they made us believe precisely with passages like Luke 22:3 (“Then Satan entered Judas…”), Mark 5:12-13 (the demons entering the pigs), and John 13:27 (“After the morsel, Satan entered him”).
This is my purpose: to help righteous people not waste their power believing in the lies of impostors who have adulterated the original message, which never asked anyone to kneel before anything or pray to anything that had ever been visible.
It is no coincidence that in this image, promoted by the Roman Church, Cupid appears alongside other pagan gods. They have given the names of the true saints to these false gods, but look at how these men dress and how they wear their long hair. All this goes against faithfulness to God’s laws because it is a sign of rebellion, a sign of the fallen angels (Deuteronomy 22:5).
The serpent, the devil, or Satan (the slanderer) in hell (Isaiah 66:24, Mark 9:44). Matthew 25:41: “Then he will also say to those on his left: ‘Depart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire that has been prepared for the devil and his angels’.” Hell: the eternal fire prepared for the serpent and his angels (Revelation 12:7-12), for having combined truths with heresies in the Bible, the Quran, the Torah, and for having created false forbidden gospels that they called apocryphal, to give credibility to lies in the false sacred books, all in rebellion against justice.
Book of Enoch 95:6: “Woe to you, false witnesses and to those who weigh the price of injustice, for you will perish suddenly!” Book of Enoch 95:7: “Woe to you, unjust ones who persecute the righteous, for you yourselves will be handed over and persecuted because of that injustice, and the burden of your guilt will fall upon you!” Proverbs 11:8: “The righteous is delivered from trouble, and the wicked comes in his place.” Proverbs 16:4: “The Lord has made all things for Himself, even the wicked for the day of doom.”
Book of Enoch 94:10: “Unjust ones, I say to you that He who created you will overthrow you; upon your ruin, God will have no mercy, but rather, God will rejoice in your destruction.” Satan and his angels in hell: the second death. They deserve it for lying against Christ and His faithful disciples, accusing them of being the authors of Rome’s blasphemies in the Bible, such as love for the devil (the enemy).
Isaiah 66:24: “And they shall go out and look upon the corpses of the men who have rebelled against me; for their worm shall never die, nor shall their fire be quenched, and they shall be abhorrent to all flesh.” Mark 9:44: “Where their worm does not die, and the fire is never quenched.” Revelation 20:14: “Then Death and Hades were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death: the lake of fire.”
Without statues or images, the false prophet is unemployed. Without lies, he disappears.
Word of Satan to his prophets: «Demand that they wait for heavenly trumpets before demanding restitution for the stolen bread. Tell them to be patient: first the stars must fall, the heavens must tremble, and the trumpets must sound; afterwards, perhaps, they will be able to demand the bread that was taken from them today. A people that endures the scourge because it believes that the entire universe will have to collapse to save it is a people that will keep waiting on its knees while my empire feeds on its bread until the last of its days.»
The false prophet: ‘God condemns idolatry, but don’t you dare burn this sacred book that commands you to worship a creature as an exception to the rule.’
A pastor caught in a crime is not a fallen pastor, but a wolf unmasked.
The wicked cannot be corrected. He is not a sheep, he is a wolf. The sheep may stray, but returns to the right path if guided. The wolf pretends to be a sheep to inspire trust and betray later. The shepherd does not shepherd the wolf; he hunts it.
A modern empire no longer needs a coliseum: it only needs propaganda, tense borders, and obedient soldiers.
The ‘unforgivable sin’, created by the empire that persecuted the righteous, is a shield to protect dogma. They forgive crimes but condemn doubt in them. How can one not doubt the word of the empire that, after persecuting the righteous, arrogated to itself the right to define which texts the righteous preached? Their priority is not justice; it is blind obedience to them with blind faith.
Without manipulated minds, without armed hands, and without forced bodies… there is no war.
False prophets are miracle merchants: they sell silence from a statue and call it ‘faith’.
Word of Satan: «Convince them that denouncing evil is judging, that only God should judge and that they should not do so; convince them that remaining silent in the face of the evil committed by the enemy is loving the enemy and that this is a divine commandment. Thus I will get them to love me as long as no one denounces me for having adulterated the divine commandment.»
UFO와 드래곤 https://penademuerteya.com/2026/09/30/idi30ufod/
Imperium Rzymskie, Bahira, Mahomet, Jezus i prześladowany judaizm. https://bestiadn.com/2026/07/07/imperium-rzymskie-bahira-mahomet-jezus-i-przesladowany-judaizm/
If you research more, you’ll see the connection. Tyrants fear the word because they cannot imprison it. Word of Satan: «Do not always change the words; change the meaning they are supposed to have when they can no longer defend them.»»
