Logic dismantles it in seconds. The false prophet hides contradictions and, unable to explain them coherently, calls them ‘apparent’; the true prophet denounces them, even if for centuries they have been considered ‘sacred truths’. For the false prophet, speaking against injustice is less serious than speaking against his dogmas.
Same god Zeus, same forbidden food—pork—and devil doctrines passed off as Jesus and his religion. //58
Why do the teachings of Cleobulus appear as gospels in the Bible? What kind of scam is this? //29
Jesus did not say ‘I am the truth’, nor did he baptize with water… Water does not make you free; it is not the truth that sets free, because it is not information that brings you out of deception. //56
Do you prefer tradition or do you prefer truth? Have you ever in your life read this? Habakkuk 2:18: ‘What is the use of the carved image that its maker has carved? The molten image that teaches lies, so that the maker trusts in his own work by making mute images?’ The lie is not taught by the image, but by the one who uses it to repeat to you the lies of the empire that turned religious images into a business. Their lies are: ‘Love your enemies.’ Are extortionists your friends? Does it sound logical to you that the messenger of justice said: ‘Love the extortionists’? Every day we see how they kill unjustly. Is it not the Devil who asks that we tolerate them? Is it not the Devil who defends them from ‘an eye for an eye’ with lies? Exactly: it was not Jesus who rejected ‘an eye for an eye’; it was the Roman Empire that did so, but it told us that he did it. The empire killed him, but lied by saying that they were forgiven by him. The same empire that renamed the images of its gods: Minerva as Mary, Zeus as Jesus, Mars as Michael. The question is simple: are you going to keep repeating… or are you going to start questioning? Word of Satan: ‘God was mistaken when He said life for life against the murderer. He sent me to say: Do not condemn them to death, that is now a sin.’ Word of Satan: ‘If you do not bless those who curse you, you curse my teachings and you curse me; then I will also curse you on the day of judgment, saying: Depart from me, you cursed; go into the eternal fire prepared for the Devil and his angels…’ (When Satan mixes what he teaches with what he attacked in anger, his sermon becomes incoherent and is exposed as absurd.) //92
MANDATORY MILITARY SERVICE. Reverence for statues from childhood paves the way to mandatory military service and to dying without meaning for lifeless symbols. Every venerated statue is a lie someone profits from. The true coward is the one who lets himself be killed without question. Forced recruitment: Should those two young men really kill each other? Or should they shake hands and ask who ordered them to be there? He who clouds their minds with an image is the perfect soldier to die without anyone giving him reasons. From religion to war, from the state to the barracks: all blessed by the false prophet, to train obedient people who will die for others. Everything that enslaves the mind—twisted religion, weapons, rented soccer, or flag—is blessed by the false prophet to instill deadly obedience. A government that forces you to die offers no convincing arguments to earn your willingness and does not deserve to be obeyed. WHO ARE THE ENEMIES OF CIVILIANS? Two opposing armies on each side of the image, each pointing aggressively with weapons or shouting at groups of frightened civilians trapped in the middle. Both armies are trying to forcibly recruit civilians to fight against the other side. Although the armies wear different uniforms and flags, both are hostile to the civilians they want to drag by force to be the other side’s ‘zombies’ in the war business, in which they are nothing more than expendable pawns in the eyes of ‘kings’ who play chess with them. //50
Ayudando al pensamiento crítico a sacudirse de dogmas impuestos desde la niñez. Soy creador del blog: https://ntiend.me (https://gabriels.work).
Este blog no solo está en español y tiene como propósito respetar la inteligencia frente al dogma.
Este blog no fue creado para defender la Biblia ni para buscarle una interpretación alternativa, porque eso sería darle crédito como un bloque coherente de mensajes. Los textos allí atribuidos a los santos contienen contradicciones demasiado numerosas para etiquetarlas como simples accidentes o diferencias de interpretación. Mientras se atribuye a los santos mensajes tanto de amor como de odio hacia sus enemigos, aquí hay gato encerrado. La cuestión no es cómo interpretar la Biblia o sus enigmas, sino saber hasta dónde llegan las raíces del engaño: si los mensajes están adulterados, no tiene sentido perder el tiempo intentando descifrar enigmas bíblicos posiblemente adulterados por la mano que mató a los santos y se apoderó de sus escritos para arrogarse la autoridad moral de determinar qué escritura, original o escrita por esa mano asesina, debía considerarse “la verdad” y cuál no.
//
Helping critical thinking shake off the dogmas imposed since childhood. I am the creator of the blog: https://ntiend.me (https://gabriels.work).
This blog is not only in Spanish and is intended to respect intelligence in the face of dogma.
This blog was not created to defend the Bible or to seek an alternative interpretation of it, because that would give it credit as a coherent body of messages. The texts attributed there to the saints contain far too many contradictions to dismiss them as mere accidents or differences in interpretation. While the saints are attributed with messages expressing both love and hatred toward their enemies, there is something fishy going on here. The question is not how to interpret the Bible or its enigmas, but rather how deep the roots of the deception go: if the messages have been adulterated, there is no point wasting time trying to decipher biblical enigmas possibly adulterated by the hand that killed the saints and seized their writings in order to arrogate to itself the moral authority to determine which writing, original or written by that murderous hand, was to be considered “the truth” and which was not.
Ver todas las entradas de José Carlos Galindo Hinostroza