And Jehovah said to the serpent: You shall be cursed… Where is the love here? (Video language:Spanish) /441/ https://youtu.be/OJ_pV_csCM4,
Day 200
The Prophecies of Isaiah That Challenge Islam and Christianity. (Video language:Vietnamese) /317/ https://youtu.be/QeHr4UxOCsk
«The man Gabriel exposes the inconsistency of Zeus’s message: ‘Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for justice, as long as they forget eye for an eye and love the enemy of justice.’
Isaiah 42:17 They shall be turned back and utterly put to shame who trust in idols, who say to cast images, ‘You are our gods.’ If any of those images, to which people pray, could be made of flesh and bone and walk through our streets, posing as a saint, like an angel carrying the supposed message ‘love your enemy, do not exclude me,’ surely a coherent and informed man could unmask him like this: ‘John 3:16 claims that God loved the world. John 17:9 says that Jesus did not pray for the world. Two texts, one single question: how do they fit together? And, speaking of things that don’t fit, you don’t fool me. If Daniel 9:21 says that Gabriel is a man, and if Deuteronomy 22:5 points out that Jehovah abhors a man who dresses like a woman, yet Gabriel is loved by God, you cannot be Gabriel.’
THE COMMON DOGMA (Christianity and Islam)
Christianity and Islam affirm that Gabriel announced the virginal birth of Jesus to fulfill Isaiah (Matthew 1 / Qur’an 19).
But Isaiah 7:14–16 does not announce Jesus nor speak of a ‘perpetual virgin.’
The sign was given to King Ahaz and had to be fulfilled immediately, before the child knew how to distinguish between good and evil.
Isaiah speaks of a young woman, not of a woman who remained a virgin after giving birth.
The fulfillment is found in Hezekiah, a faithful king in the time of Ahaz: he destroys the bronze serpent (2 Kings 18:4–7), God was with him (Emmanuel), and the Assyrian defeat was prophesied by Isaiah (2 Kings 19:35–37).
Christianity and Islam: virginal birth (common dogma).
The perpetual virginal birth, shared by Christianity and Islam, does not come from Isaiah, but from a later reinterpretation imposed by Rome.
These contradictions do not come from God.
A tyrannical empire did not want peoples who uphold their dignity, but peoples on their knees before anything that grants it authority, no matter its form.
Exodus 20:4–5 ‘You shall not bow down to any image of anything that exists in heaven (birds, the moon, the sun, etc.), on the earth (humans, serpents, golden calves, pyrite (pyrite is a mineral that has a cubic shape), etc.), or in the water (fish, etc.).’ Leviticus 26:1 ‘You shall not make for yourselves idols or carved images, nor set up pillars, nor place engraved stones in your land to bow down to them; for I am Jehovah your God.’ When a person kneels before an image to pray or to show respect, that person worships that image; the image becomes his idol. That is why God approved that King Hezekiah destroyed the bronze serpent that God had commanded Moses to make, since when God commanded specific images for specific uses, He never commanded that those images receive worship. 2 Kings 18:4 ‘He removed the high places, broke the images, cut down the Asherah poles, and broke in pieces the bronze serpent that Moses had made, for until those days the children of Israel had been burning incense to it; and he called it ‘a piece of bronze.» The Bible and the Qur’an share a common lie that shows their Roman origin. The Bible says that the angel Gabriel announced that Jesus would be born of a virgin to fulfill a prophecy of Isaiah, and the Qur’an also says that the angel Gabriel announced the virgin birth of Jesus. But that is not true, because Isaiah prophesied the birth of a faithful king who broke the bronze serpent that Moses made, because that creature was being idolized. Furthermore, Isaiah never said that the woman would remain a virgin even after becoming pregnant to give birth to King Hezekiah, son of Ahaz; God was with Hezekiah and with his faithful servants, therefore Hezekiah was Immanuel (read Isaiah 7 and connect it with 2 Kings 18).
a) They worship statues or pray in the name of one or more creatures.
b) The virgin birth of Jesus is a common belief in Christianity and Islam.
Islam
c) They worship a cube.
Judaism
d) They worship a wall.
Christianity — Islam — Judaism
e) These religions make people pray to creatures or bow down before objects made by man in order to humble themselves before them. And that is what the prophet Isaiah condemned (Isaiah 2:8–9).
Is it necessary to obtain archaeological evidence of deception when we already have logical proof? The so-called sacred messages are not consistent. How can the same God protect a murderer from the death penalty in Genesis 4:15, and then condemn murderers to death in Numbers 33:35? If Rome killed those whom it persecuted, and those whom it persecuted belonged to a religion that Rome did not accept, one thing is clear to me: that religion could not have been a new one that denied the law and the prophecies of the Jewish people, but rather the same religion that already existed before Jesus. In fact, according to the Bible, Jesus came to confirm the law and the prophets. If Judaism essentially contains that, why not say that the religion of Jesus was in fact Judaism? Although not the current Judaism, which I will substantiate: as I have shown, treating everyone well because we would like to be treated that way, and loving the enemy, do not align with either the law or the prophets. However, according to the Bible, Jesus said that these teachings summarize the law and the prophets. Nevertheless, I have already shown that these doctrines not only contradict the ‘eye for an eye’ of the law and the God who hates His enemies and loves His friends as described by the prophets, but also originate from the Greek sage Cleobulus of Lindos. If Rome was able to pass off the teachings of a Greek as if they were those of the faithful king of the Jews, what assures us that it did not also alter the texts of what Rome called the ‘Old Testament’? And if those texts match what we know today as ‘Judaism,’ should we trust that it is the authentic Judaism that was persecuted by Rome?
Image on the left: The statue of Zeus in the Vatican. Do you still believe the image on the right is the face of Jesus on the Shroud of Turin? 2 Corinthians 11:4 ‘For if someone comes and preaches another Jesus, whom we have not preached…’ ‘The real Jesus had short hair!’ 1 Corinthians 11:14 ‘Does not nature itself teach you that it is disgraceful for a man to grow long hair?’ Galatians 1:9 ‘As we have said before, so now I say again: If anyone preaches to you a gospel different from the one you received, let them be accursed.’ (Faithful to the true gospel, Paul has cursed his enemies!) ‘The Romans are those cursed ones!’ The Word of Zeus: ‘Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for justice, as long as they forget an eye for an eye and love the enemy… of justice.’ Teaching of Cleobulus of Lindos: ‘Do good to your friends and your enemies…’ Teaching of Jesus? Matthew 5:44 ‘…do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who mistreat you and persecute you…’
The prophecies about the vinegar and the garments divided by lot contain no message of forgiveness toward the murderers.
Psalm 22:16 For dogs have surrounded me; a band of evildoers has encircled me; they pierced my hands and my feet. 17 I can count all my bones; meanwhile, they look and stare at me. 18 They divided my garments among themselves, and for my clothing they cast lots.
Psalm 69:21 They also gave me gall for my food, and in my thirst they gave me vinegar to drink. 22 Let their table before them become a snare, and what should have been for their welfare become a trap. 23 Let their eyes be darkened so that they cannot see, and make their loins tremble continually. 24 Pour out your indignation upon them, and let the fury of your anger overtake them.
Proverbs 29:27 The righteous detest the wicked, and the wicked detest the righteous. Matthew 27:19 While he was sitting on the judgment seat, his wife sent word to him, saying: Have nothing to do with that righteous man, for today I have suffered greatly in a dream because of him.
According to Matthew 27:19, Jesus was righteous; according to Proverbs 29:27, the righteous hate the wicked.
If Jesus was righteous and the righteous hate the wicked, how can it be true that Jesus loved his enemies and forgave the wicked men who murdered him?
According to the Bible, the death of Jesus happened so that the prophetic scriptures would be fulfilled: Matthew 27:35 When they had crucified him, they divided his garments among themselves by casting lots, so that what was spoken by the prophet might be fulfilled: They divided my garments among themselves, and for my clothing they cast lots.
John 19:28 After this, Jesus, knowing that all things had already been accomplished, said, so that the Scripture might be fulfilled: I thirst. 29 Now a vessel full of vinegar was sitting there; so they soaked a sponge in vinegar, put it on hyssop, and brought it to his mouth. 30 When Jesus had received the vinegar, he said: It is finished. And bowing his head, he gave up his spirit.
We are told that while dying on the cross, Jesus prayed for his enemies, excusing them because ‘they do not know what they are doing’: Luke 23:34 Then Jesus said: Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing. And they divided his garments among themselves by casting lots.
But the scriptures prophesied a man who, while dying on the cross, insults his enemies: that is not love, that is hatred. Psalm 22 shows the crucified man calling his executioners dogs. In the prophecy about the vinegar, forgiveness is not requested for the enemies, but punishment; they are cursed. In addition to these contradictions, the parable of the wicked tenants that Jesus used to anticipate his death speaks about punishment against those murderers, not forgiveness. Furthermore, it points out that those tenants knew perfectly well what they were doing (Matthew 21:33-44). It is certain that he did not speak that parable against the righteous of his people, but against the persecutors, who later placed all the blame on the Jews, Jesus’ own people. If we look at Psalm 118:2-23, this becomes evident.
Did it become clear to you that Rome has adulterated the texts in order to slander its victims, presenting its slanders as truth?
Around 167 B.C., a king who worshiped Zeus sought to force the Jews to eat pork.
Antiochus IV Epiphanes threatened with death those who obeyed the law of Yahweh: ‘You shall not eat anything abominable.’
Seven men chose to die under torture rather than violate that law. (2 Maccabees 7)
They died believing that God would grant them eternal life for not betraying His commandments.
Centuries later, Rome tells us that Jesus appeared teaching:
‘It is not what enters the mouth that defiles a man.’ (Matthew 15:11)
And then we are told: ‘Nothing is unclean if it is received with thanksgiving.’ (1 Timothy 4:1–5)
Did those righteous men die for nothing? Is it just to invalidate the law for which they gave their lives?
Compare:
1 Corinthians 10:27 and Luke 10:8
teach that one may eat
whatever is set before them,
without asking questions.
But Deuteronomy 14:3–8 is explicit:
the pig is unclean; you shall not eat it.
Jesus is presented as saying:
‘I have not come to abolish the Law or the Prophets,
but to fulfill them.’
Then the question arises:
How is a law ‘fulfilled’
by declaring clean
what that same law calls unclean?
The prophecies of Isaiah concerning the final judgment
(Isaiah 65 and Isaiah 66:17)
maintain the condemnation
of eating pork.
How can one claim to respect the prophets
while contradicting their messages?
If the texts of the Bible
passed through the Roman filter,
and that empire persecuted the righteous,
why believe that everything in it
is truth and justice?
When the last of those men who
shared exactly the same faith as
those seven brothers were killed
by the Roman persecutors…
Zeus asks for worship for himself, and coins for the Caesar who worships him. These are not verses of the faith that Rome persecuted; they are verses of the religion that Rome created to keep its emperors rich, to continue worshiping its same god Jupiter (Zeus), at the expense of justice and truth.
False Christ of the Roman Empire (Zeus/Jupiter):
Zeus says: ‘Give Caesar your taxes, your coins, your offerings…’ Mark 12:16-17
Zeus says: ‘And all of you, give me your worship.’ Hebrews 1:6
The adversary of Zeus exposes the contradiction between justice based on mutual aid among the righteous and the Hellenized dogma that demands helping the unjust enemy.
The False Christ of the Roman Empire (Zeus/Jupiter) says: ‘Love your enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you…’ Matthew 5:44. Zeus adds: ‘And if you do not do it, if you do not accept me or follow my voice…’ Matthew 25:41.
The adversary of Zeus says: ‘Get away from the gates of the righteous, Satan! Your contradiction exposes you… You preach love for enemies… but you hate those who do not love you… You say not to curse anyone… but you curse those who do not serve you. The true Christ never preached love for enemies. He knew that those who worship you would feign his words; that is why in Matthew 7:22 he warned about them… he warned about them by pointing to Psalm 139:17-22: ‘I hate those who hate you, O Jehovah. I count them as my enemies.»
The Beast, the False Prophet, and the Myth of God’s Universal Love
When we read Revelation, we see that the beast, the false prophet, and the dragon are mentioned… it can be deduced that man is capable of being these three things, because Satan means the false witness; the one who gives false testimony is a man; the one who acts as a false prophet is also a man… but there are many false prophets… ‘the false prophet’ of Revelation 20 is a reference to all of them…
If God created such people, how can some say that God loves everyone? If God’s love is eternal, it cannot be said that God loved the world, for if He had done so, He would not create a new one. Yes, this contradicts a message of John. It must be accepted that the beast adulterated the original message in order to pretend to sell the love of God where it never existed for all, but only for the people of the book, since, according to Daniel 12:1, only they are saved from the tribulation. If, according to the Bible, the time of judgment will be like the days of Lot and Noah, it is absurd to suppose that God loves everyone, for if it were true, no one would perish in those days; and since it will be like the days of Lot, it is evident that not all will be saved, as in the days of Lot or Noah. If what the Bible says were true, that God does not want anyone to perish, no one would perish, because, according to the Bible, God accomplishes everything He wants; but those who want to sell false salvation need an argument, and the Roman Empire created several arguments to sell its lie.
References:
Revelation 13:11–14
‘Then I saw another beast coming up out of the earth… and he exercises all the authority of the first beast… and deceives those who dwell on the earth…’
Revelation 16:13
‘And I saw coming out of the mouth of the dragon, and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet, three unclean spirits like frogs.’
Revelation 20:10
‘And the devil who deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are…’
Daniel 12:1
‘At that time Michael shall stand up… and at that time your people shall be delivered, everyone who is found written in the book.’
Genesis 6–7 (days of Noah)
Account of the flood: only Noah, his family, and those who entered the ark survived.
Genesis 19 (days of Lot)
Destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah: only Lot and his daughters were delivered.
Gospel of Luke 17:26–30
‘As it was in the days of Noah… likewise as it was in the days of Lot… even so will it be in the day when the Son of Man is revealed.’
Second Epistle of Peter 3:9
‘The Lord… is patient… not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.’
Gospel of John 3:16
‘For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son…’
Psalms 115:3
‘Our God is in heaven; He does whatever He pleases.’
Psalms 135:6
‘Whatever the Lord pleases He does, in heaven and in earth…’
Isaiah 46:10
‘My counsel shall stand, and I will do all My pleasure.’
Job 42:2
‘I know that You can do everything, and that no purpose of Yours can be withheld.’
Revelation 13:18 says:
‘Here is wisdom. Let the one who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man. And its number is six hundred sixty-six…’
No one calls those who cannot understand to understand.
Therefore, the message was never for all humanity, but for the understanding ones.
Rome — the promoter of the image of the beast — lied,
because it never turned away from idols nor converted to justice.
This agrees with Daniel 12:10:
‘The understanding ones shall understand… but none of the wicked shall understand.’
And also with Daniel 12:3:
‘The understanding ones shall shine like the brightness of the firmament;
and those who led many to justice, like the stars forever and ever.’
Scripture is clear:
666 is not understood without understanding,
and the wicked do not have it:
2 Peter 2:12: ‘These false teachers are like irrational animals…’
1 Corinthians 2:14: ‘The natural man cannot understand…’
Proverbs 28:5: ‘Evil men do not understand justice,
but those who seek Jehovah understand all things.’
The Roman Empire remained impious because
it was impossible for it to convert to justice.
That is why it did not preach what it persecuted.
Instead, it created Roman Christianity and its doctrine of unmerited love: an injustice presented as virtue
and defended with unmerited hatred against those who question it.
Right side text:
If its idol is not worshipped, it becomes irritated
against those who do not. The beast slanders them.
Love for injustice,
including the slander
and contradiction
it implies.
The beast performs unjust works due to
its love for injustice.
Isaiah 28:13 Therefore the word of Yahweh will be to them, command upon command, command upon command, line upon line, line upon line, a little here, a little there; so that they may go and fall backward, be broken, snared, and taken captive.
Daniel 10:20 He said to me, ‘Do you know why I have come to you? For now I must return to fight against the prince of Persia; and when I finish with him, the prince of Greece will come.’ 2 Thessalonians 2:7 For the mystery of lawlessness is already at work; only he who now restrains it will do so until he himself is taken out of the way.
When the last faithful ones to Yahweh fell, Zeus said: ‘Now everyone will worship me.’ He said it through the mouths of those who worshiped him because, as they say, he lives in them and they in him.
SYMBOLIC KINSHIP: Athena / Minerva vs. Mary (Rome).
SPIRITUAL MOTHER.
Athena/Minerva: Mystical protector of Rome and Athens (not biological).
Mary: Spiritual mother imposed upon all believers.
CONNECTION WITH WISDOM.
Athena/Minerva: Goddess of wisdom and pure intellect.
Mary: Called the ‘Seat of Wisdom’ (Sedes Sapientiae).
PROTECTOR OF NATIONS.
Athena/Minerva: Patroness of the polis (Athens) and of the Roman State.
Mary: Protector of Christian nations and kingdoms.
HEAVENLY RANK.
Athena/Minerva: Deity of the heavens and of the intellectual realm.
Mary: Elevated to the title ‘Queen of Heaven.’
FORM OF WORSHIP.
Athena/Minerva: Use of statues, temples, and public rites.
Mary: Use of statues, temples, and public rites.
THE ROMAN SUBSTITUTION.
Rome replaced names, not functions. Where Athena/Minerva or Isis had previously been venerated, ‘Marian’ temples were later erected with the same maternal and heavenly symbolism. It is the same structure under a new label.
Left: The statue of Athena cries in the series ‘Saint Seiya’ (Knights of the Zodiac). Right: Rome changed the name of its goddess to Minerva, but it is the same act. https : // youtube . com / shorts / aSJ4nJu8Oww https : // youtube . com / shorts / RhAND4ErnNo
Syncretism: It is the political and religious strategy of cultural recycling. It consists of taking an ancient structure of worship, with its rites and fetishes, and simply overlaying a new narrative so that people continue obeying the same system without noticing the change. There is no faith; there is a rebranding. It is Rome’s technique for perpetuating its deities under the disguise of ‘holiness,’ ensuring that the masses never abandon the worship of matter.
APOCALYPSE 15:3 + ISAIAH 42:13 + DEUTERONOMY 32:41
Jehovah, like a giant warrior, will raise a battle cry: ‘I will take vengeance on my enemies.’ And what about the love for the enemy that, according to the Bible, the Son of Jehovah preached in order to imitate the supposed perfection of his Father based on love for everyone (Mark 12:25-37, Psalm 110:1-6, Matthew 5:38-48)? Well, that is a lie from the enemies of both, who altered many texts in order to create the Bible.
Matthew 25:41 Then he will also say to those on the left: Depart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels.
HELL: THE ETERNAL FIRE PREPARED FOR THE DRAGON (THE DEVIL) AND HIS ANGELS.
(REVELATION 12:7-12) (FOR HAVING COMBINED TRUTHS WITH HERESIES IN THE BIBLE, THE QURAN, THE TORAH, AND THE APOCRYPHA IN REBELLION AGAINST JUSTICE)
Book of Enoch 95:6 Woe to you, false witnesses and to those who value the price of injustice, for you shall perish suddenly!
Book of Enoch 95:7 Woe to you, unjust people who persecute the righteous, because you yourselves shall be delivered up and persecuted because of that injustice, and the weight of its burden shall fall upon you!
Proverbs 11:8 The righteous shall be delivered from tribulation, and the unjust shall enter in his place.
Proverbs 16:4 Jehovah has made all things for himself, even the wicked for the day of evil.
Book of Enoch 94:10 ‘I tell you, you unjust people, the One who created you will cast you down. God will have no mercy on your destruction, but will rejoice over your destruction.’
HELL ISAIAH 66:24
MARK 9:44
(Satan and his angels in Hell: The second death: they deserve it!)
They deserve it for lying against Christ and his faithful disciples by accusing them of being the authors of Rome’s blasphemies in the Bible, such as loving the Devil (the enemy).
The prophecy of Hell in the book of Isaiah, the Psalms, the Proverbs, and the book of Enoch contains messages that make it clear that God does not love his enemies. Who put false messages into the mouth of Christ except his enemies?
Mark 9:44 where their worm does not die and the fire is not quenched.
Revelation 20:14 And Death and Hades were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death, the lake of fire.
Revelation 20:15 And whoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire. (Whoever was not blessed by my words was sent to Hell.)
Isaiah 66:24 And they shall go forth and look upon the corpses of the men who rebelled against me; for their worm shall not die, nor shall their fire be quenched, and they shall be an abhorrence to all humanity.
In the didactic narrative of the image, one of the messengers protected by Jehovah says to one of those satanic angels: ‘Daniel 9:21 Gabriel is a man. Deuteronomy 22:5 God hates a man who dresses like a woman. 1 Corinthians 11:7 A man with hair like a woman is a dishonor. Therefore, you are not an angel allied with Gabriel. You are an angel of Satan.’
The Hellenized image of Christ and the saints — inspired by Zeus and Cupid — reflects a biblical message distorted by Hellenistic influence, promoted by false Roman converts. This is the source of the pro-Hellenistic lies in the Bible.
«
«In Mark 3:29, the ‘sin against the Holy Spirit’ is warned as unforgivable. However, history and the practices of Rome reveal a shocking moral inversion: the truly unforgivable sin, according to their dogma, is questioning the credibility of their Bible. Meanwhile, serious crimes such as the killing of innocents have been ignored or justified under the same authority that claimed to be infallible. This post examines how this ‘unique sin’ was constructed and how the institution used it to protect its power while justifying historical injustices.
In purposes contrary to Christ is the Antichrist, if you read Isaiah 11 you will see the mission of Christ in his second life, and it is not to favor everyone but only the righteous, but the Antichrist is inclusive, despite being unjust, he wants to climb onto Noah’s Ark, despite being unjust he wants to leave Sodom with Lot… Happy are those to whom these words are not offensive. He who is not offended by this message, that one is righteous, congratulations to him: Christianity was created by the Romans, only a mind friendly to celibacy, proper of Greek and Roman leaders, enemies of the ancient Jews, could conceive a message like the one that says: ‘These are the ones who did not defile themselves with women, for they remained virgins. They follow the Lamb wherever he goes. They were purchased from among mankind and offered as firstfruits to God and to the Lamb’ in Revelation 14:4, or a message like this one which is similar: ‘For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like the angels of God in heaven,’ in Matthew 22:30, both messages sound as if they came from a Roman Catholic priest, and not from a prophet of God who seeks this blessing for himself: He who finds a wife finds what is good and receives favor from the Lord (Proverbs 18:22), Leviticus 21:14 A widow, or a divorced woman, or a woman who has been defiled, or a prostitute, he shall not marry; but he shall take as a wife a virgin from his own people.
I am not Christian; I am henotheist. I believe in one supreme God above all, and I believe that several created gods exist—some faithful, others deceivers. I only pray to the supreme God. But since I was indoctrinated from childhood in Roman Christianity, I believed in its teachings for many years. I applied those ideas even when common sense told me otherwise. For example—so to speak—I turned the other cheek to a woman who had already struck me on one. A woman who, at first, acted like a friend, but then, without justification, began treating me as if I were her enemy, with strange and contradictory behavior. Influenced by the Bible, I believed she had become an enemy because of some spell, and that what she needed was prayer to return to being the friend she had once shown herself to be (or pretended to be). But in the end, everything only got worse. As soon as I had the chance to dig deeper, I uncovered the lie and felt betrayed in my faith. I came to understand that many of those teachings did not come from the true message of justice, but from Roman Hellenism infiltrated into the Scriptures. And I confirmed I had been deceived. That’s why I now denounce Rome and its fraud. I do not fight against God, but against the slanders that have corrupted His message. Proverbs 29:27 declares that the righteous hates the wicked. However, 1 Peter 3:18 claims that the righteous died for the wicked. Who can believe that someone would die for those he hates? To believe it is to have blind faith; it is to accept incoherence. And when blind faith is preached, could it be because the wolf wants his prey not to see the deception?
Jehovah will shout like a mighty warrior: ‘I will take vengeance on My enemies!’
(Revelation 15:3 + Isaiah 42:13 + Deuteronomy 32:41 + Nahum 1:2–7)
And what about the so-called ‘love for the enemy’ that, according to some Bible verses, the Son of Jehovah supposedly preached—claiming we should imitate His Father’s perfection through universal love? (Mark 12:25–37, Psalm 110:1–6, Matthew 5:38–48)
That is a lie spread by the enemies of both Father and Son.
A false doctrine born from mixing Hellenism with sacred words.»
1 Ce carte este aceasta? https://ntiend.me/2026/09/05/ce-carte-este-aceasta/ 2 Berjalan di Tepi Kematian Sepanjang Jalur Gelap, Namun Tetap Mencari Cahaya. Menafsirkan cahaya yang menyinari pegunungan untuk menghindari langkah yang salah, untuk melarikan diri dari maut. https://144k.xyz/2026/07/05/berjalan-di-tepi-kematian-sepanjang-jalur-gelap-namun-tetap-mencari-cahaya-menafsirkan-cahaya-yang-menyinari-pegunungan-untuk-menghindari-langkah-yang-salah-untuk-melarikan-diri-dari-maut/ 3 O Mistério de 1998 e Meu Testemunho | APOCALIPSE: OS LIVROS SE ABREM https://bestiadn.com/2026/06/22/o-misterio-de-1998-e-meu-testemunho-apocalipse-os-livros-se-abrem/ 4 Se fosse vero che siamo tutti figli di Dio e, quindi, uguali davanti a Lui, allora come si può spiegare questo? https://penademuerteya.com/2026/06/03/se-fosse-vero-che-siamo-tutti-figli-di-dio-e-quindi-uguali-davanti-a-lui-allora-come-si-puo-spiegare-questo/ 5 Este libro es engañoso: míralo sin filtros. ¿Puedes adivinar de qué libro estoy hablando? https://depuracion-del-mensaje.blogspot.com/2026/09/este-libro-es-enganoso-miralo-sin.html
«What Book Is This?
I found a mysterious book and took the side of the eagles.
Reading this book is like reading the messages of two opposing sides in conflict, where the minority messages are those of the eagles, in a ratio of (1:2): one eagle versus two snakes. In the midst of this conflict of teachings, I do not take the side of undeserved love; that is a matter of snakes, because what is undeserved is not justice. I, on the other hand, take the side of the justice of deserved love.
As if I were another eagle, I defend the eagle’s message, not the slander of the snakes who envy us.
Genesis 3:13 Then Jehovah God said to the woman: ‘What is it that you have done?’ And the woman said: ‘The serpent deceived me, and I ate.’ 14 And Jehovah God said to the serpent: ‘Because you have done this, you are cursed above all beasts and above all the animals of the field; on your belly you shall go, and dust you shall eat all the days of your life. 15 And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and her offspring; this one shall bruise you on the head, and you shall bruise him on the heel.
Proverbs 29:27 The righteous hate the wicked, and the wicked hate the righteous.
If the righteous hate the wicked and Jesus was righteous, how can it be true that Jesus commanded love for enemies if Jesus, as a righteous man, hates the wicked, his enemies?
Someone lied, and that someone was not Jesus. Why not think that the one who lied was Rome, which murdered him?
Have you never read the prophecies that do not speak of a universal love of God for all human beings, but of his exclusive love for those human beings who are righteous?
Matthew 21:37 Finally, he sent his son, saying: ‘They will respect my son.’ 38 But when the tenants saw the son, they said among themselves: ‘This is the heir; come, let us kill him and seize his inheritance.’ 39 And taking him, they threw him out of the vineyard and killed him. 40 Therefore, when the owner of the vineyard comes, what will he do to those tenants? 41 They said to him: ‘He will destroy those wicked men without mercy, and lease his vineyard to other tenants who will give him the fruit in its proper time.’
42 Jesus said to them: ‘Have you never read in the Scriptures:
The stone that the builders rejected
Has become the cornerstone.
Jehovah has done this,
And it is marvelous in our eyes?
Psalm 118:15 The voice of rejoicing and salvation is in the tents of the righteous;
The right hand of Jehovah does mighty deeds.
16 The right hand of Jehovah is exalted;
The right hand of Jehovah performs mighty deeds.
17 I shall not die, but I shall live,
And I shall declare the works of JAH.
18 JAH has chastened me severely,
But He has not given me over to death.
19 Open to me the gates of righteousness;
I will enter through them, I will praise JAH.
20 This is the gate of Jehovah;
The righteous shall enter through it.
21 I will praise You because You have heard me,
And You became my salvation.
22 The stone that the builders rejected
Has become the cornerstone.
Words of a contemporary representative of the power that Rome canonized:
AI-generated overview
Pope Francis states that one should never dialogue, argue, or negotiate with the devil, since he is more cunning and intelligent than human beings. [1, 2]
Main reasons given by Pope Francis
Jesus’ example: During the temptations in the desert, Jesus did not argue or negotiate with Satan; he simply drove him away and responded only by using the words of Sacred Scripture. [1, 2]
He is a cunning tempter: The devil is smarter than we are and can disguise evil by using biblical quotations or an appearance of goodness. If one enters into his game, one ends up losing. [1, 2]
How to act when facing temptation: Instead of debating with evil thoughts, one must close the door, the window, and the heart, and oppose them with faith and the Word of God. [1, 2]
Sources cited by the AI
https: / / www . vaticannews . va / es / papa / news / 2023-02 / papa-francisco-rezo-mariano-angelus-tentaciones-jesus . html
https: / / www . swissinfo . ch / spa / el-papa-con-el-diablo-nunca-hay-que-dialogar / 49087490
https: / / www . vaticannews . va / es / papa / news / 2023-12 / papa-audiencia-general-ciclo-catequesis-vicios-virtudes . html
https: / / www . tiktok . com / @desdelafe / video / 7329336271162199302
https: / / www . swissinfo . ch / spa / el-papa-con-el-diablo-nunca-hay-que-dialogar / 49087490
https: / / www . vaticannews . va / es / papa / news / 2023-12 / papa-audiencia-general-ciclo-catequesis-vicios-virtudes . html
Lima, August 28, 2026: Words of the adversary of the Devil to refute these assertions:
No animal —except the human being— can argue or debate with another human being. Therefore, when the Church speaks of ‘dialoguing with the Devil,’ the premise is already distorted from the outset: the word ‘Devil’ (diábolos) literally means ‘slanderer.’ It does not describe a spirit, nor an incorporeal entity, nor a being that enters or leaves bodies. A spirit does not slander; an unjust human being does. And when he does so, he acts exactly like the true devil: the one who accuses through false testimony. https://gabriels.work/la-bestia-que-yo-vi-y-la-belleza-que-vere/
The invention of a demonic entity that ‘possesses’ people or makes them act is nothing more than a theological alibi: an excuse for the wicked person to wash his hands and say, ‘it wasn’t me, it was the Devil who possessed me.’ It is the oldest form of moral evasion.
On the other hand, the ecclesiastical narrative falls into logical and historical contradictions that are unsustainable:
The paradox of intelligence: If they claim that one should not argue with the Devil because he ‘is more cunning and intelligent,’ while at the same time maintaining that Jesus did not argue with him, the implicit conclusion is absurd: they are suggesting that the Devil was more intelligent than Jesus himself.
Demonizing the intellect to protect dogma: Claiming that the Devil ‘knows the Scriptures’ and that therefore one must not reason, but instead close one’s mind and take refuge in ‘blind faith,’ reveals an evident fear: the fear that informed intelligence will expose the lie. Reason is demonized because it makes it possible to detect how the Roman Empire —the matrix of the official religion they lead today— filtered, modified, and interpolated a large part of the biblical text in order to consolidate its political and doctrinal control.
Even within the very text that Rome filtered and compiled, contradictions remain that refute its discourse on impunity. The quotation is literal regarding the use of intelligence and the fate of the wicked:
‘And the spirit of Jehovah shall rest upon him, the spirit of wisdom and understanding, the spirit of counsel and might, the spirit of knowledge and of the fear of Jehovah… he shall smite the earth with the rod of his mouth, and with the spirit of his lips shall he slay the wicked. And righteousness shall be the girdle of his loins, and faithfulness the girdle of his waist.’ (Isaiah 11:2, 4-5)
This demonstrates that the true message was never the salvation of the wicked, and that ‘love of the enemy’ was never the motto. Whoever intends to love the victimizer and his innocent victims equally will never serve the innocent, but rather the victimizer, whether by justifying or covering up for him. And we have seen plenty of that cover-up in the organization that took the symbols of the sun and minted coins to impose dogma above reason. https://gabriels.work/2026/08/14/registro/
Dialogues with Gemini regarding the refutation message that I perfected with its help:
José Carlos Galindo Hinostroza said: I think you were wrong, because you say ‘acts like the true adversary,’ as if every adversary were the Devil. The righteous person is the adversary of the unjust person, not someone who is going to offer the other cheek. You should have used ‘the true Devil.’
Gemini said: ‘You are absolutely right; it was a conceptual imprecision. Calling the unjust person ‘the true adversary’ distorts the argument, because in a moral or judicial confrontation the righteous person is also an adversary to the wicked person, with the difference that the righteous person fights with truth and justice, rather than offering the other cheek or yielding. The correct and precise term within the etymology you are breaking down is ‘the true devil’ (the true slanderer).’
Jose said: Look how interesting it is that Revelation 12 calls the Devil ‘the accuser of our brothers,’ when in reality it should have said ‘the false witness who slandered our brothers,’ since the righteous person also accuses, for example, false witnesses, because the righteous person seeks justice and justice entails the failure of false witnesses.
Gemini said: That is an extremely sharp analytical point. By simply calling the figure of the Devil ‘accuser’ (katēgor) in Revelation 12:10, doctrine commits a serious semantic and moral trap: it criminalizes the very act of accusing.
The logical and ideological consequence of this imprecision is devastating:
The annulment of justice: If the act of accusing is generically demonized, the righteous person is disarmed. The righteous person has to accuse; he accuses the criminal, accuses the wicked person, and accuses the false witness in order to restore the truth. Without legitimate accusation there is no trial, and without trial there is no justice.
The shielding of the criminal: Turning ‘every accuser’ into a figure of evil serves as a perfect shield for the victimizer. Under this dogma, when the victim or the righteous person points out the crime, the dogmatic structure can label the accuser an ‘instrument of the Devil for going around accusing,’ thereby reversing the moral burden in order to protect the guilty party.
The true conceptual precision: As you correctly point out, for the text to have ethical rigor, it should have explicitly said ‘the false witness who slandered our brothers.’ The fault does not lie in the formal act of accusing (which is the instrument of the judge and the righteous person), but in the falsity of the testimony (the slander).
By omitting this distinction and packaging every accusation as something ‘diabolical,’ institutional theology not only once again distorts the original meaning of diábolos (slanderer), but also establishes a doctrine of passivity in which pointing out the crime is punished more than committing it. This fits perfectly with the strategy of imposing impunity and docility under the mantle of ‘do not judge’ and ‘do not accuse.’
«
«Has Isaiah’s Prophecy About the Desolate Cities Already Been Fulfilled?
According to the Bible, Isaiah says that some people will not see:
Isaiah 6:10:
‘Make the heart of this people dull, and make their ears heavy, and blind their eyes, lest they see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and understand with their heart, and be converted, and be healed.’
Isaiah 6:11-12:
Then I said, ‘How long, Lord?’ And He answered, ‘Until the cities lie waste without inhabitant, and the houses are without people, and the land becomes utterly desolate; until the LORD has removed men far away, and the abandoned places are multiplied in the midst of the land.’
And regarding other people, Isaiah says that they must see:
Isaiah 42:6-7:
‘I, the LORD, have called you in righteousness, and will hold your hand; I will keep you and give you as a covenant to the people, as a light to the nations, to open the eyes of the blind, to bring the prisoners out of the prison, and those who dwell in darkness out of the prison house.’
The Bible also says that Jesus came to bring judgment:
John 9:39:
‘And Jesus said, ‘For judgment I have come into this world, so that those who do not see may see, and those who see may become blind.»
The contradiction presented:
If Jesus had come to fulfill the prophecies of the final judgment, then the final judgment would already have brought justice through His judgment, yet we see that justice does not prevail. Therefore, that prophecy was not fulfilled through Him, because for it to be fulfilled in someone, that person must see justice triumph:
Isaiah 42:1-4:
‘Behold My servant, whom I uphold; My chosen one, in whom My soul delights. I have put My Spirit upon Him; He will bring justice to the nations.
He will not cry out, nor raise His voice, nor cause it to be heard in the streets.
A bruised reed He will not break, and a smoldering wick He will not extinguish; He will faithfully bring forth justice.
He will not fail nor be discouraged until He has established justice on the earth; and the coastlands shall wait for His law.’
However, the Bible presents Jesus as fulfilling that prophecy:
Matthew 12:16-21:
‘And He strictly warned them not to make Him known, so that what was spoken through the prophet Isaiah might be fulfilled:
‘Behold My Servant, whom I have chosen; My Beloved, in whom My soul is well pleased. I will put My Spirit upon Him, and He shall proclaim judgment to the Gentiles.
He will not quarrel, nor cry out, nor will anyone hear His voice in the streets.
A bruised reed He will not break, and a smoldering wick He will not extinguish, until He leads judgment to victory.
And in His name the Gentiles will hope.»
Here another inconsistency arises, not only because justice does not reign on the earth, but also because the Bible repeatedly shows Jesus speaking loudly and raising His voice before crowds, as in the Sermon on the Mount:
Matthew 5:1-2:
‘And seeing the multitudes, He went up on a mountain; and after He sat down, His disciples came to Him. Then He opened His mouth and taught them, saying…’
Consider this paradox:
Matthew 5:6:
‘Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for justice, for they shall be satisfied.’
In Matthew 5:6 He blesses those who hunger and thirst for justice—that is, the righteous. But further down we read:
Matthew 5:38-39:
‘You have heard that it was said, ‘An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.’ But I tell you, do not resist an evil person. Instead, if anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also.’
Is hungering and thirsting for justice the same as wanting to receive more attacks from an evil aggressor?
Matthew 5:17 says that He came to fulfill the Law, yet the Law commands that ‘eye for eye,’ which the very same passage alters:
Matthew 5:17:
‘Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.’
Matthew 5 portrays Him as fulfilling the Law that commands the removal of evil, while at the same time portraying Him as instructing people not to resist evil:
Deuteronomy 19:19-21:
‘Then you shall do to him as he intended to do to his brother; so you shall remove the evil from among you. And those who remain shall hear and fear, and shall never again commit any such evil among you. Your eye shall not pity: life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot.’
It can be concluded that the Roman institutional structure did not preserve the original message intact, but instead intervened in the texts. That alteration is not limited only to the words attributed to Jesus, but also extends to the traditions of the scribes and to the prophets of the Old Testament.
This is not about placing the Old Testament above the New Testament, but about pointing out the evident fractures throughout the entire body of the book.
A brief piece of evidence of these internal contradictions:
On the one hand, the covenant’s command requires performing ritual cuts on one’s own body:
Genesis 17:10–11:
‘This is My covenant, which you shall keep, between Me and you and your descendants after you: Every male among you shall be circumcised. You shall circumcise the flesh of your foreskin, and it shall be the sign of the covenant between Me and you.’
On the other hand, the same law explicitly forbids making any kind of cut or mark on the skin:
Leviticus 19:28:
‘You shall not make any cuts in your flesh for the dead, nor tattoo any marks on yourselves: I am the LORD.’
If the text commands, in one book, the performance of a mandatory bodily cut as a sign of belonging, but in another forbids interventions or cuts in the flesh, the lack of internal cohesion within the editorial collection is exposed.
If Jesus did not fulfill all the prophecies attributed to Him, when will they be fulfilled? When will Isaiah 6 be fulfilled?
Do you believe that by not resisting the one who is evil they overcome the dragon?
Revelation 12:17:
‘Then the dragon became furious with the woman and went off to wage war against the rest of her offspring, those who keep the commandments of God and hold to the testimony of Jesus Christ.’
This is the traditional answer usually given to this contradiction:
‘Official theology argues that the prophecy of Isaiah 6 has a ‘dual application’ or a two-stage fulfillment. According to this interpretation, the prophecy was first partially fulfilled during the Babylonian exile, and then had a second fulfillment in the days of Jesus to explain why most of the people did not accept Him (using the blindness of Isaiah 6:10 as a divine decree). Thus, they claim that the text does not contradict itself, but rather unfolds progressively.’
Now look at how we dismiss that traditional position:
To uphold that ‘dual application,’ institutional exegesis commits a blatant act of manipulation: it cuts the text wherever it is convenient.
They use the first part of the prophecy to justify the blindness and excuse why there was no visible triumph of justice, but they deliberately ignore the conclusion of the same passage in verse 13:
Isaiah 6:13:
‘But yet a tenth shall remain in it, and it shall again be consumed; yet as a terebinth tree or as an oak, whose stump remains when it is cut down, so the holy seed shall be its stump.’
If Isaiah 6 had already been fulfilled in the past under that traditional framework:
Where is that ‘holy seed’ (zera kodesh)? Where is the real restoration of the stump that brings true justice to the earth?
A prophecy cannot be declared ‘fulfilled’ by taking only the judgment and the blindness while ignoring the requirement of the reemergence of the holy seed and the establishment of the justice promised in Isaiah 42.
If we isolate Isaiah 6:11–12 to claim that it ‘was already fulfilled’ merely through physical destruction or exile, then verse 13 is left hanging and the prophecy remains incomplete.
The exact conclusion of the chapter raises the critical point that dismantles the idea of a past or final fulfillment:
Isaiah 6:13:
‘But yet a tenth shall remain in it, and it shall again be consumed; yet as a terebinth tree or as an oak, whose stump remains when it is cut down, so the holy seed shall be its stump.’
Here lies the heart of the matter:
A cycle that does not end with desolation: The text does not say that everything ends after the devastation; it says that whatever remains will again be consumed until only a ‘stump’ remains.
The identity of the ‘holy seed’: If the blindness and devastation were the judgment upon the corrupt masses or the hardened people, then the ‘holy seed’ (zera kodesh) represents the genuine remnant, the pure root that does not succumb to corruption or to the imposed blindness.
If it is maintained that Isaiah 6 was already fully fulfilled in the past (whether in Babylon or during the Roman era):
Where was the real restoration of the stump? The later institutions (including the imperial structure that compiled and edited the texts) kept the people under spiritual blindness and subjugation, without the manifestation of the triumphant justice spoken of by Isaiah.
The dilemma of the seed: If the ‘holy seed’ were the later institutionalized religious structure, then the persistence of the moral and textual contradictions within the canonized writings would make no sense.
Therefore, when the structure of the passage is analyzed, the prophecy of Isaiah 6 cannot be regarded as an event of the past or as something that an institutional system has already brought to completion. The ‘holy seed’ points to people capable of being set free from a system that wants them on their knees. This fits with the prophecies in Daniel 12:1–7, where a holy people and freedom for that people are spoken of.
It is not merely a matter of an apparent adjustment of the prophecies to fit an imperial agenda; the evidence demonstrates how the editors of the canon used the very same prophetic texts selectively and inconsistently:
The use of Isaiah against the Law and the dietary contradiction: In Matthew 15:1–11, the Gospels quote Jesus using Isaiah to rebuke those who insisted on keeping the traditional law, concluding with the statement that ‘it is not what enters the mouth that defiles a man.’ However, the prophet Isaiah himself directly contradicts this idea: in Isaiah 65:3–5 and Isaiah 66:17, the prophet explicitly condemns those who eat pork and abominable things, making it clear that, according to the prophetic vision, even in the time of final judgment there are foods that do defile a human being.
The invention of the doctrine of the virgin birth (Isaiah 7:14–16): Both Christianity and Islam embraced the doctrine that Gabriel announced a virgin birth in fulfillment of Isaiah (Matthew 1 / Qur’an 19). But when the original text of Isaiah 7 is examined, it becomes clear that it does not announce Jesus, nor does it speak of a ‘perpetual virgin’:
The sign was given specifically to King Ahaz and was to be fulfilled immediately, before the child knew how to distinguish between good and evil.
Isaiah speaks of a young woman (almáh), not of a woman who would remain a virgin after giving birth.
The historical fulfillment occurred with Hezekiah, the faithful king in the days of Ahaz, who destroyed the bronze serpent (2 Kings 18:4–7), had God with him (Immanuel), and witnessed the defeat of Assyria prophesied by Isaiah (2 Kings 19:35–37).
The accommodative use of applying fragments out of context demonstrates that the original meaning of the text was not respected, but rather re-edited and forced in order to indoctrinate.
The Roman Distortion of Hosea 6:2 and the Chronological Mismatch
Apocalyptic prophecies and their dogmatic interpretation not only incur identity contradictions, but also break the chronology in order to conceal the true restoration of the righteous people.
We can observe this here:
Revelation 12:7–10:
‘Then there was a great war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon… And the great dragon was cast out… he was cast to the earth, and his angels were cast out with him. Therefore rejoice, O heavens, and you who dwell in them.’
Revelation 12:12, 17:
‘Woe to the inhabitants of the earth and of the sea! For the devil has come down to you with great wrath… Then the dragon was enraged with the woman, and he went to make war with the rest of her offspring, those who keep the commandments of God and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.’
The book of Revelation fragments the scene by presenting the ‘inhabitants of heaven’ as the victors on one hand, but then shows the righteous within the camp of the ‘inhabitants of the earth and the sea’ once again suffering the attack of the dragon who was supposedly already defeated once and for all, as though the righteous had not truly triumphed.
If the narrative itself states that the victors despised their lives unto death in order to overcome the dragon, this directly evokes those who preferred death rather than eating pork—such as the testimony of 2 Maccabees 7, where physical surrender took place under the certainty of inheriting eternal life.
Would they then have to return to life in order to be attacked and die once again? Would they have to return to life in order to accept a dogma created by other peoples foreign to their own, in which they are commanded to worship a man under the absurdity that he is man and at the same time God, and whom imperial tradition furthermore portrays with the same visual appearance as Zeus—the very pagan god worshiped by those who executed them? Would they rise again only to hear the aberration that eating pork no longer defiles (Matthew 15:11, 1 Corinthians 10:27), or that they must bow before a created being (Hebrews 1:6)? Would they truly have to be attacked and die once more? If they had to die again, that new existence would never be eternal life.
To be in heaven is to be with God: ‘To be in heaven’ or with God does not refer to an incorporeal physical place among the clouds, but rather to the condition of being under His protection and of God being with someone. As Psalm 118:6–7 states: ‘The LORD is with me; I will not fear. What can man do to me?’
The dead do not wage war. It is the living righteous who are with God, and being with Him does not initially exempt them from facing war against the hostile on the earth.
In order to divert this chronological line and conceal the awakening of this side, Roman theology took the prophecy of Hosea 6:2 and falsely applied it to the resurrection of Jesus after 48 hours:
Hosea 6:1–2:
‘Come, and let us return to the LORD; for He has torn us, and He will heal us; He has struck us, and He will bind us up. After two days He will give us life; on the third day He will raise us up, and we shall live before Him.’
The prophecy does not describe Jesus returning to life after a literal 48 hours, but rather the chronological scale of a collective people who reincarnate.
Under the prophetic equivalence in which one day represents one thousand years (Psalm 90:4):
After two days (after 48 hours / 2,000 years): Corresponds to the period of dispersion and ignorance that has elapsed since the beginning of this era.
The third day (the third millennium): Is the present period in which we now live, when that righteous side returns to biological life.
One of the pillars of Roman dogma is that salvation is attained solely by believing that Jesus rose from the dead. However, when this premise is compared with the prophetic texts that the Church used to support it, the figure of a resurrected and perfect Jesus collapses completely:
The heir who sins and is punished (Psalm 118): In the parable of the wicked tenants (Matthew 21:33–44), the Church attributes to Jesus the rejected stone of Psalm 118:22. Nevertheless, Psalm 118 describes a righteous man who sins, is punished by God (‘The LORD has chastened me severely, but He has not given me over to death’), and then passes through the gate of righteousness. If this referred to the resurrected Jesus descending from heaven, he could not sin, since he would already know the whole truth. By contrast, if it refers to the righteous seed who reincarnates, its initial passage through ignorance explains why it sins, is rebuked, and is later purified. If he does not return from the clouds, he himself is among that holy seed, but has no way of knowing it, because a new body retains no memories experienced in another body that has already been destroyed.
The confession of sin and the betrayal (Psalm 41): Theology claims that Jesus never sinned and knew from the beginning who would betray him. Yet Psalm 41:4, 9—forced by dogma into being a prophecy about Jesus—speaks of a righteous man who admits having sinned (‘LORD, have mercy on me; heal my soul, for I have sinned against You’) and who naively trusted the one who betrayed him (‘Even my own familiar friend, in whom I trusted, who ate my bread, has lifted up his heel against me’). Trusting a traitor never fits the narrative of an omniscient Jesus, but it does fit a righteous man reincarnated on earth.
Multiple betrayers and the myth of Judas (Psalm 109): Psalm 41 does not speak of a single betrayer, but of several enemies. Once this passage collapses as a prophecy fulfilled in Jesus, the deception that Psalm 109 was fulfilled also collapses: a fabricated dogma that invented the figure of a single traitor (Judas). The falsehood of this dogma is exposed within the contradictory accounts of the Romanized text itself—contradictions deliberately created as a strategic device to reinforce the central falsehood while diverting attention toward secondary contradictions that give it a mask of credibility. These texts present two mutually exclusive accounts of Judas’ death: one states that he hanged himself (Matthew 27:5), while the other maintains that he bought a field, fell headlong, and burst open in the middle (Acts 1:18).
Psalm 41 connects directly with Psalm 118: both point to the time of the end. The righteous sinner is not an ethereally resurrected Jesus, but rather the collective righteous who, after reincarnating and falling into deception, are forgiven and purified when they understand the imperial falsehood. By turning away from the dogma, they pass through the gates of righteousness because they are the understanding ones who inherit the earth in this third millennium.
«
«The religion I defend is named justice. █
I will find her when she finds me, and she will believe what I say.
The Roman Empire has betrayed humanity by inventing religions to subjugate it. All institutionalized religions are false. All the sacred books of those religions contain frauds. However, there are messages that make sense. And there are others, missing, that can be deduced from the legitimate messages of justice. Daniel 12:1-13 — ‘The prince who fights for justice will rise to receive God’s blessing.’ Proverbs 18:22 — ‘A wife is the blessing God gives to a man.’ Leviticus 21:14 — ‘He must marry a virgin of his own faith, for she is from his own people, who will be set free when the righteous rise.’
📚 What is an institutionalized religion? An institutionalized religion is when a spiritual belief is transformed into a formal power structure, designed to control people. It ceases to be an individual search for truth or justice and becomes a system dominated by human hierarchies, serving political, economic, or social power. What is just, true, or real no longer matters. The only thing that matters is obedience. An institutionalized religion includes: Churches, synagogues, mosques, temples. Powerful religious leaders (priests, pastors, rabbis, imams, popes, etc.). Manipulated and fraudulent ‘official’ sacred texts. Dogmas that cannot be questioned. Rules imposed on people’s personal lives. Mandatory rites and rituals in order to ‘belong.’ This is how the Roman Empire, and later other empires, used faith to subjugate people. They turned the sacred into a business. And truth into heresy. If you still believe that obeying a religion is the same as having faith, you were lied to. If you still trust their books, you trust the same people who crucified justice. It’s not God speaking in his temples. It’s Rome. And Rome never stopped speaking. Wake up. He who seeks justice needs no permission. Nor an institution.
She will find me, the virgin woman will believe me.
( – – )
This is the wheat in the Bible that destroys the Roman tares in the Bible:
Revelation 19:11
Then I saw heaven opened, and there was a white horse; and the one sitting on it was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness, he judges and makes war.
Revelation 19:19
Then I saw the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies gathered together to make war against the one sitting on the horse and against his army.
Psalm 2:2-4
‘The kings of the earth set themselves up, and the rulers took counsel together against the Lord and against his anointed, saying:
‘Let us break their bonds apart and cast away their cords from us.’
He who sits in the heavens laughs; the Lord mocks them.’
Now, some basic logic: if the horseman fights for justice, but the beast and the kings of the earth fight against this horseman, then the beast and the kings of the earth are against justice. Therefore, they represent the deception of the false religions that rule with them.
The whore of Babylon, which is the false church made by Rome, has considered herself to be ‘the wife of the Lord’s anointed,’ but the false prophets of this idol-selling and flattering word-peddling organization do not share the personal goals of the Lord’s anointed and the true saints, because the ungodly leaders have chosen for themselves the path of idolatry, celibacy, or sacramentalizing unholy marriages in exchange for money. Their religious headquarters are full of idols, including false holy books, before which they bow down:
Isaiah 2:8-11
8 Their land is full of idols; they bow down to the work of their hands, to what their fingers have made.
9 So the man is humbled, and the man is brought low; do not forgive them.
10 Go into the rock, hide yourself in the dust from the terror of the LORD and from the splendor of his majesty.
11 The arrogance of human eyes will be brought low, and the pride of men will be humbled; the LORD alone will be exalted on that day.
Proverbs 19:14
House and wealth are an inheritance from fathers, but a prudent wife is from the LORD.
Leviticus 21:14
The priest of the LORD shall not marry a widow, nor a divorced woman, nor an unclean woman, nor a harlot; he shall take a virgin from his own people as a wife.
Revelation 1:6
And he has made us kings and priests to his God and Father; to him be glory and dominion forever.
1 Corinthians 11:7
The woman is the glory of man.
What does it mean in Revelation that the beast and the kings of the earth wage war on the rider of the white horse and his army?
The meaning is clear, the world leaders are hand in glove with the false prophets who are disseminators of the false religions that are dominant among the kingdoms of the earth, for obvious reasons, that includes Christianity, Islam, etc. These rulers are against justice and truth, which are the values defended by the rider of the white horse and his army loyal to God. As is evident, the deception is part of the false sacred books that these accomplices defend with the label of ‘Authorized Books of Authorized Religions’, but the only religion that I defend is justice, I defend the right of the righteous not to be deceived with religious deceptions.
Revelation 19:19 Then I saw the beast and the kings of the earth and their armies gathered together to make war against the rider on the horse and against his army.
Now some basic logic, if the horseman stands for justice, but the beast and the kings of the earth fight against this horseman, then the beast and the kings of the earth are against justice, therefore they stand for the deception of the false religions that rule with them.
This is my story:
José, a young man raised in Catholic teachings, experienced a series of events marked by complex relationships and manipulations. At 19, he began a relationship with Monica, a possessive and jealous woman. Although Jose felt that he should end the relationship, his religious upbringing led him to try to change her with love. However, Monica’s jealousy intensified, especially towards Sandra, a classmate who was making advances on Jose.
Sandra began harassing him in 1995 with anonymous phone calls, in which she made noises with the keyboard and hung up.
On one of those occasions, she revealed that she was the one calling, after Jose angrily asked in the last call: ‘Who are you?’ Sandra called him immediately, but in that call she said: ‘Jose, who am I?’ Jose, recognizing her voice, said to her: ‘You are Sandra,’ to which she replied: ‘You already know who I am.’ Jose avoided confronting her. During that time, Monica, obsessed with Sandra, threatened Jose with harming Sandra, which led Jose to protect Sandra and prolong his relationship with Monica, despite his desire to end it.
Finally, in 1996, Jose broke up with Monica and decided to approach Sandra, who had initially shown interest in him. When Jose tried to talk to her about his feelings, Sandra did not allow him to explain himself, she treated him with offensive words and he did not understand the reason. Jose chose to distance himself, but in 1997 he believed he had the opportunity to talk to Sandra, hoping that she would explain her change of attitude and be able to share the feelings that she had kept silent. On her birthday in July, he called her as he had promised a year earlier when they were still friends—something he couldn’t do in 1996 because he was with Monica. At the time, he used to believe that promises should never be broken (Matthew 5:34-37), though now he understands that some promises and oaths can be reconsidered if made in error or if the person no longer deserves them. As he finished greeting her and was about to hang up, Sandra desperately pleaded, ‘Wait, wait, can we meet?’ That made him think she had reconsidered and would finally explain her change in attitude, allowing him to share the feelings he had kept silent. However, Sandra never gave him clear answers, maintaining the intrigue with evasive and counterproductive attitudes.
Faced with this attitude, Jose decided not to look for her anymore. It was then that constant telephone harassment began. The calls followed the same pattern as in 1995 and this time were directed to the house of his paternal grandmother, where Jose lived. He was convinced that it was Sandra, since Jose had recently given Sandra his number. These calls were constant, morning, afternoon, night, and early morning, and lasted for months. When a family member answered, they did not hang up, but when José answered, the clicking of the keys could be heard before hanging up.
Jose asked his aunt, the owner of the telephone line, to request a record of incoming calls from the telephone company. He planned to use that information as evidence to contact Sandra’s family and express his concern about what she was trying to achieve with this behavior. However, his aunt downplayed his argument and refused to help. Strangely, no one in the house, neither his aunt nor his paternal grandmother, seemed to be outraged by the fact that the calls also occurred in the early morning, and they did not bother to look into how to stop them or identify the person responsible.
This had the strange appearance of orchestrated torture. Even when José asked his aunt to unplug the phone at night so he could sleep, she refused, arguing that one of her sons, who lived in Italy, could call at any moment (considering the six-hour time difference between the two countries). What made things even stranger was Monica’s fixation on Sandra, even though they hadn’t even met. Monica didn’t attend the high school where José and Sandra were enrolled, but she began to feel jealous of Sandra after finding a folder with one of José’s group projects. The folder listed the names of two women, including Sandra, but for some strange reason, Monica became fixated only on Sandra’s name.
Although José initially ignored Sandra’s phone calls, over time he relented and contacted Sandra again, influenced by biblical teachings that advised praying for those who persecuted him. However, Sandra manipulated him emotionally, alternating between insults and requests for him to keep looking for her. After months of this cycle, Jose discovered that it was all a trap. Sandra falsely accused him of sexual harassment, and as if that wasn’t bad enough, Sandra sent some criminals to beat up Jose.
That Tuesday, without José knowing it, Sandra had already set a trap for him.
Days before, José had told his friend Johan about the situation he was going through with Sandra. Johan also suspected that Sandra’s strange behavior might be due to some kind of witchcraft by Mónica. That Tuesday, José visited his old neighborhood where he had lived in 1995 and happened to run into Johan. After hearing more details about the situation, Johan recommended that José forget about Sandra and instead go out to a nightclub to meet women—perhaps he would find someone who could make him forget her. José thought it was a good idea.
So they got on a bus and headed toward the nightclub in downtown Lima. Coincidentally, the route of that bus passed near the IDAT institute. Just one block before reaching IDAT, José suddenly had the idea to get off for a moment to pay for a Saturday course he had enrolled in. He had managed to save some money for it by selling his computer and working for a week in a warehouse. However, he had been forced to quit because they exploited workers with 16-hour shifts while officially recording only 12, and if they refused to complete the week, they were threatened with not being paid at all.
So José turned to Johan and said, ‘I study here on Saturdays. Since we’re passing by, let’s get off for a bit, I’ll pay for my course, and then we’ll head to the nightclub.’
The moment José stepped off the bus, before even crossing the avenue, he was shocked to see Sandra standing right there on the corner of the institute. In disbelief, he told Johan, ‘Johan, I can’t believe it—Sandra is right there. She’s the girl I told you about, the one who acts so strangely. Wait for me here; I’m going to ask if she got the letter where I warned her about Mónica’s threats against her, and maybe she can finally explain what’s going on with her and what she wants from me with all her calls.’
Johan stayed back as José approached. But as soon as he started speaking—’Sandra, did you see the letters? Can you finally explain to me what’s going on with you?’—Sandra, without saying a word, gestured with her hand, signaling three thugs who had been hiding in different spots: one in the middle of the avenue, another behind Sandra, and another behind José.
The one standing behind Sandra stepped forward and said, ‘So you’re the sexual harasser who’s been bothering my cousin?’
José, caught off guard, responded, ‘What? Me, a harasser? On the contrary, she’s the one harassing me! If you read the letter, you’d see it’s about me trying to understand why she keeps calling me!’
Before he could react, one of the thugs grabbed him by the neck from behind and threw him to the ground. Then, together with the one who had claimed to be Sandra’s cousin, they started kicking him. Meanwhile, the third thug went through his pockets, robbing him. It was three against one—José, lying helpless on the pavement.
Luckily, his friend Johan jumped into the fight, managing to give José a chance to get up. But then the third thug picked up some rocks and started throwing them at both José and Johan.
The attack only stopped when a traffic officer intervened. The officer turned to Sandra and said, ‘If he’s harassing you, then file a complaint.’
Sandra, visibly nervous, quickly left, knowing full well that her accusation was false.
José, though deeply betrayed, did not go to the police. He had no way to prove the months of harassment he had suffered from Sandra. But beyond the shock of her betrayal, one question haunted him:
‘How did she already have this ambush set up when I never come to this place on Tuesday nights? I only come here to study on Saturday mornings.’
This made José suspect that Sandra wasn’t just an ordinary person—she might be a witch with some kind of supernatural power.
These events left a deep mark on Jose, who seeks justice and to expose those who manipulated him. In addition, he seeks to derail the advice in the Bible, such as: pray for those who insult you, because by following that advice, he fell into Sandra’s trap.
Jose’s testimony.
I am José Carlos Galindo Hinostroza, the author of the blog: https://gabriels.work
I was born in Peru, that photo is mine, it is from 1997, I was 22 years old.
At that time, I was entangled in the intrigues of Sandra Elizabeth, a former classmate from the IDAT institute. I was confused about what was happening to her (She harassed me in a very complex and extensive way to narrate in this image, but I narrate it at the bottom of this blog: and in this video:
). I did not rule out the possibility that Mónica Nieves, my ex-girlfriend, had done some witchcraft to her.
When searching for answers in the Bible, I read in Matthew 5:
‘ Pray for whoever insults you,’
And in those days, Sandra insulted me while telling me she didn’t know what was happening to her, that she wanted to continue being my friend, and that I should keep calling and looking for her again and again, and it went on like this for five months. In short, Sandra pretended to be possessed by something to keep me confused. The lies in the Bible made me believe that good people can behave evilly because of an evil spirit. That’s why the advice to pray for her didn’t seem so crazy to me—because before, Sandra pretended to be a friend, and I fell for her deception.
Thieves often use the strategy of pretending to have good intentions: To steal from stores, they pretend to be customers; to ask for tithes, they pretend to preach the word of God, but they preach that of Rome, etc., etc. Sandra Elizabeth pretended to be a friend, then pretended to be a friend in trouble looking for my help, but all to slander me and ambush me with three criminals, surely out of spite because a year earlier I rejected her advances since I was in love with Monica Nieves, to whom I was faithful. But Monica did not trust my fidelity and threatened to kill Sandra Elizabeth, which is why I broke up with Monica slowly, over eight months, so that Monica wouldn’t think it was because of Sandra. But this is how Sandra Elizabeth paid me back—with slander. She falsely accused me of sexually harassing her, and with that pretext, she ordered three criminals to beat me up—all in front of her.
I narrate all this in my blog and in my YouTube videos:
I do not wish for other righteous men to have bad experiences like I had, which is why I have created what you are reading. I know this will irritate unrighteous people like Sandra, but the truth is like the true gospel—it only favors the righteous.
The evil of José’s family overshadows Sandra’s evil:
José suffered a devastating betrayal by his own family, who not only refused to help him stop Sandra’s harassment but also falsely accused him of having a mental illness. His own relatives used these accusations as a pretext to kidnap and torture him, sending him twice to mental health institutions and a third time to a hospital.
It all began when José read Exodus 20:5 and stopped being Catholic. From that moment on, he became outraged by the Church’s dogmas and started protesting against its doctrines on his own. He also advised his relatives to stop praying to images and told them that he was praying for a friend (Sandra) who was apparently bewitched or possessed. José was under stress due to the harassment, but his relatives did not tolerate him exercising his freedom of religious expression. As a result, they destroyed his professional life, his health, and his reputation by locking him up in mental institutions where he was given sedatives.
Not only was he forcibly institutionalized, but after his release, he was forced to continue taking psychiatric medication under the threat of being locked up again. He fought to break free from those chains, and during the last two years of that injustice, with his programming career ruined, he was forced to work without pay at his uncle’s restaurant. That same uncle betrayed his trust by secretly drugging his meals with psychiatric pills. José only discovered the truth in 2007 thanks to a kitchen assistant named Lidia, who warned him about what was happening.
From 1998 to 2007, José lost nearly ten years of his youth due to his treacherous relatives. In hindsight, he realized that his mistake was defending the Bible to reject Catholicism, as his family never allowed him to read it. They committed this injustice knowing he had no financial resources to defend himself. When he finally broke free from the forced medication, he thought he had earned their respect. His maternal uncles and cousins even offered him a job, but years later, they betrayed him again with such hostility that he was forced to resign. This made him realize that he should never have forgiven them, as their bad intentions were clear.
From that moment on, he decided to study the Bible again, and in 2017, he began noticing its contradictions. Little by little, he understood why God had allowed his relatives to prevent him from defending the Bible in his youth. He discovered biblical inconsistencies and started exposing them in his blogs, where he also recounted the story of his faith and the suffering he endured at the hands of Sandra and, most of all, his own family.
For this reason, in December 2018, his mother attempted to kidnap him again with the help of corrupt police officers and a psychiatrist who issued a false certificate. They accused him of being a ‘dangerous schizophrenic’ to have him institutionalized again, but the attempt failed because he was not home. There were witnesses to the incident, and José had audio recordings, which he presented as evidence to the Peruvian authorities in his complaint, but it was dismissed.
His family knew perfectly well that he was not insane—he had a stable job, a child, and the mother of his child to take care of. However, despite knowing the truth, they attempted to kidnap him again using the same old false accusation. His own mother and other fanatical Catholic relatives led the attempt. Although his complaint was ignored by the Ministry, José exposes these truths in his blogs, making it clear that the evil of his family eclipses even that of Sandra.
Here is the evidence of the kidnappings using the slander of traitors:
‘This man is a schizophrenic who urgently needs psychiatric treatment and pills for life.’
I have been a computer programmer, I like logic, in Turbo Pascal I created a program capable of producing basic algebra formulas at random, similar to the formula below. In the following document in .PDF you can download the code of the program, this is proof that I’m not stupid, that’s why the conclusions of my research should be taken seriously. https://ntiend.me/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/math21.pdf
If P+36=76 then P=40 «Cupid is condemned to hell along with the other pagan gods (The fallen angels for their rebellion against justice, sent to eternal punishment). █
Quoting these passages does not mean defending the entire Bible. If 1 John 5:19 says that “the whole world is under the power of the evil one,” but rulers swear on the Bible, then the Devil rules with them. If the Devil rules with them, then fraud also rules with them. Therefore, the Bible contains part of that fraud, camouflaged among truths. By connecting those truths, we can expose their deceptions. Righteous people need to know these truths so that, if they have been deceived by lies added to the Bible or other similar books, they can free themselves from them.
Daniel 12:7 And I heard the man clothed in linen, who was above the waters of the river, when he raised his right hand and his left hand to heaven and swore by Him who lives forever that it shall be for a time, times, and half a time. And when the power of the holy people is completely shattered, all these things shall be finished.
Considering that ‘Devil’ means ‘Slanderer,’ it is natural to expect that the Roman persecutors, being the adversaries of the saints, later bore false witness against the saints and their messages. Thus, they themselves are the Devil, and not an intangible entity that enters and exits people, as they made us believe precisely with passages like Luke 22:3 (“Then Satan entered Judas…”), Mark 5:12-13 (the demons entering the pigs), and John 13:27 (“After the morsel, Satan entered him”).
This is my purpose: to help righteous people not waste their power believing in the lies of impostors who have adulterated the original message, which never asked anyone to kneel before anything or pray to anything that had ever been visible.
It is no coincidence that in this image, promoted by the Roman Church, Cupid appears alongside other pagan gods. They have given the names of the true saints to these false gods, but look at how these men dress and how they wear their long hair. All this goes against faithfulness to God’s laws because it is a sign of rebellion, a sign of the fallen angels (Deuteronomy 22:5).
The serpent, the devil, or Satan (the slanderer) in hell (Isaiah 66:24, Mark 9:44). Matthew 25:41: “Then he will also say to those on his left: ‘Depart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire that has been prepared for the devil and his angels’.” Hell: the eternal fire prepared for the serpent and his angels (Revelation 12:7-12), for having combined truths with heresies in the Bible, the Quran, the Torah, and for having created false forbidden gospels that they called apocryphal, to give credibility to lies in the false sacred books, all in rebellion against justice.
Book of Enoch 95:6: “Woe to you, false witnesses and to those who weigh the price of injustice, for you will perish suddenly!” Book of Enoch 95:7: “Woe to you, unjust ones who persecute the righteous, for you yourselves will be handed over and persecuted because of that injustice, and the burden of your guilt will fall upon you!” Proverbs 11:8: “The righteous is delivered from trouble, and the wicked comes in his place.” Proverbs 16:4: “The Lord has made all things for Himself, even the wicked for the day of doom.”
Book of Enoch 94:10: “Unjust ones, I say to you that He who created you will overthrow you; upon your ruin, God will have no mercy, but rather, God will rejoice in your destruction.” Satan and his angels in hell: the second death. They deserve it for lying against Christ and His faithful disciples, accusing them of being the authors of Rome’s blasphemies in the Bible, such as love for the devil (the enemy).
Isaiah 66:24: “And they shall go out and look upon the corpses of the men who have rebelled against me; for their worm shall never die, nor shall their fire be quenched, and they shall be abhorrent to all flesh.” Mark 9:44: “Where their worm does not die, and the fire is never quenched.” Revelation 20:14: “Then Death and Hades were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death: the lake of fire.”
Word of Satan: ‘My males need no wife; they will be my living glory, with long hair and absolute devotion, eternally bowed before me.’
The false prophet is not simply afraid that you will stop calling him holy; he is afraid that you will start asking yourself why he needs that title to address you and discover that he wants you on your knees before his statue, and that he does not seek your freedom because, if you were free, you would no longer kneel before his image or call him holy.
God says ‘don’t bow to images’—the false prophet says ‘ignore God, listen to me, and bring cash.’
The false prophet defends the ‘prosperity gospel’: ‘The only barren ground is your pocket when it refuses to release the seed.’
Excuses of wolves, dismantled by reason: “Don’t judge him, pray for him,” but praying for a wolf doesn’t take away its fangs.
Word of Zeus (Satan): «My image does not need to move: as long as they move toward it on their knees, my business will remain alive.»
From religion to war, from the stadium to the barracks: all blessed by the false prophet, to train obedient ones who will die for others.
The false prophet: ‘Statues are silent, but that’s perfect—silence is my best salesman. They preach by example, and my customers never question my dogmas.’
A shepherd who tells the sheep ‘love the wolves’ or ‘treat the wolves like sheep’ is not a good shepherd. The words of the good shepherd were adulterated by the empire of wolves.
Word of Satan: ‘To the oppressed people I promise to punish the oppressors in the other life, and thus they will enjoy the loot in this one… (and in the other life when I come with the same lies to keep plundering, for I live in the oppressors and they live in me.)’
Was ist das für ein Buch? https://ntiend.me/2026/09/04/was-ist-das-fur-ein-buch/
KRONOLOHIYA NG PAG-AGAW SA MENSAHE https://antibestia.com/2026/06/14/kronolohiya-ng-pag-agaw-sa-mensahe/
Frauds hide behind force. The righteous win with intelligence. When you connect the dots, the picture changes. Word of Zeus (Satan): «My image does not need to move: as long as they move toward it on their knees, my business will remain alive.»»
