The Message and the Empire: Why I Am Neither Jewish, Muslim, nor Christian. (Video language:Korean) /296/ https://youtu.be/oADsszHXnUk,
Day 200
Between the Intrigues of a Cruel Woman and Dogma. (Video language:Hindi) /119/ https://youtu.be/5GWVgVO_3tg
«If the law condemns the one who causes the blind to go astray, how can it be true that Jehovah loved Jacob?
Jacob Deceived a Blind Man… And God Loved Him?
Did you know that the Bible says:
‘Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated'(Romans 9:13)
But… let’s look at the facts.
Jacob took advantage of his brother’s weakness to obtain the birthright:(Genesis 25:29–34)
And then he deceived his own father, who was blind, to steal the blessing:(Genesis 27)
Is that justice?
The same Scripture condemns that kind of act:
‘Cursed is anyone who leads the blind astray on the road.'(Deuteronomy 27:18)
It also says:
‘You hate all who do iniquity.'(Psalms 5:5)
So the question arises:
How can God love a usurper who deceives a blind man?
Can truth contradict itself?
Or…
Could it be that the Roman Empire presented a distorted message?
A usurping message… like Jacob himself?
If the system teaches you to honor a usurper… who really wrote the story?
In Genesis 25:29–34, the text does not say that Jacob deceived Esau, but that Esau sold him his birthright.
The explicit deception does appear later, when Jacob deceives his blind father(Genesis 27).
However, Esau himself interprets both events as the same act of usurpation in Genesis 27:36, when he says:
‘Is he not rightly named Jacob? For he has supplanted me these two times: he took away my birthright, and now he has taken away my blessing.'(Jacob means: ‘He who grasps the heel.’)
Is it a coincidence that the serpent in Genesis 3:15 is marked by striking the heel, and that Jacob is born grasping the heel and is called ‘Supplanter’?
Word of the serpent:’Did God really tell you not to eat that fruit (Genesis 3:1), nor the flesh of the pig (Deuteronomy 14:8)?… Roman scribe, make it pass as the word of God:… Nothing that God created is bad, if it is received with thanksgiving (1 Timothy 4:1–6).’
Word of Satan:’Servant of my empire, write also: ‘The whole world lies under the evil one (1 John 5:19), and so that they submit to me, add:
‘Let every person be subject to the governing authorities; for there is no authority except from God (Romans 13:1)… for God has placed me so that I may never be overthrown (Revelation 13:5).»
Word of Satan:’Roman, now write that Jesus rose again and that his return will be from the clouds, so that people wait for an impossible justice while I perpetuate myself with your empire in power, and love for one’s enemy is preached so that they do not demand back their gold when we steal it.’
EMPERORS AND COUNCILS THAT DEFINED THE BIBLE
CONSTANTINE I — Council of Nicaea (325 A.D.)THEODOSIUS I — Synod of Rome (382 A.D.)THEODOSIUS II — Council of Ephesus (431 A.D.)MARCIAN — Council of Chalcedon (451 A.D.)
OBJECTIVE:To eliminate any text that would contradictthe interests of the Empire.
‘Let every man be subject to the authorities…»do not claim what is yours…’
Rome plundered and did not wantresistance against its abuses.
Word of the serpent:’So God told you: do not eat that fruit (Genesis 3:1), nor pork (Deuteronomy 14:8)?… Roman scribe, pass off as the word of God:… Nothing God created is evil, if you receive it with thanksgiving (1 Timothy 4:1–6).’
Word of Satan:’Servant of my empire, write this as well: ‘The whole world is under the evil one (1 John 5:19), and so that they submit to me, add:
‘Let every person submit to the higher authorities; for there is no authority except from God (Romans 13:1)… for God appointed me so that I may never be overthrown (Revelation 13:5).»
Word of Satan:’Roman, now write that Jesus was resurrected and that his return will be from the clouds, so that people will await an impossible justice while I perpetuate myself in power through your empire, and love of the enemy is preached so that they do not demand their gold back when we steal it from them.’
EMPERORS AND COUNCILSTHAT DEFINED THE BIBLE
CONSTANTINE I — Council of Nicaea (325 AD)THEODOSIUS I — Synod of Rome (382 AD)THEODOSIUS II — Council of Ephesus (431 AD)MARCIAN — Council of Chalcedon (451 AD)
OBJECTIVE:Eliminate any text that contradictedthe interests of the Empire.
‘Let every man submit to the authorities…»do not demand what is yours…’
Rome plundered and did not wantresistance to its abuses.
«
«In Mark 3:29, the ‘sin against the Holy Spirit’ is warned as unforgivable. However, history and the practices of Rome reveal a shocking moral inversion: the truly unforgivable sin, according to their dogma, is questioning the credibility of their Bible. Meanwhile, serious crimes such as the killing of innocents have been ignored or justified under the same authority that claimed to be infallible. This post examines how this ‘unique sin’ was constructed and how the institution used it to protect its power while justifying historical injustices.
In purposes contrary to Christ is the Antichrist, if you read Isaiah 11 you will see the mission of Christ in his second life, and it is not to favor everyone but only the righteous, but the Antichrist is inclusive, despite being unjust, he wants to climb onto Noah’s Ark, despite being unjust he wants to leave Sodom with Lot… Happy are those to whom these words are not offensive. He who is not offended by this message, that one is righteous, congratulations to him: Christianity was created by the Romans, only a mind friendly to celibacy, proper of Greek and Roman leaders, enemies of the ancient Jews, could conceive a message like the one that says: ‘These are the ones who did not defile themselves with women, for they remained virgins. They follow the Lamb wherever he goes. They were purchased from among mankind and offered as firstfruits to God and to the Lamb’ in Revelation 14:4, or a message like this one which is similar: ‘For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like the angels of God in heaven,’ in Matthew 22:30, both messages sound as if they came from a Roman Catholic priest, and not from a prophet of God who seeks this blessing for himself: He who finds a wife finds what is good and receives favor from the Lord (Proverbs 18:22), Leviticus 21:14 A widow, or a divorced woman, or a woman who has been defiled, or a prostitute, he shall not marry; but he shall take as a wife a virgin from his own people.
I am not Christian; I am henotheist. I believe in one supreme God above all, and I believe that several created gods exist—some faithful, others deceivers. I only pray to the supreme God. But since I was indoctrinated from childhood in Roman Christianity, I believed in its teachings for many years. I applied those ideas even when common sense told me otherwise. For example—so to speak—I turned the other cheek to a woman who had already struck me on one. A woman who, at first, acted like a friend, but then, without justification, began treating me as if I were her enemy, with strange and contradictory behavior. Influenced by the Bible, I believed she had become an enemy because of some spell, and that what she needed was prayer to return to being the friend she had once shown herself to be (or pretended to be). But in the end, everything only got worse. As soon as I had the chance to dig deeper, I uncovered the lie and felt betrayed in my faith. I came to understand that many of those teachings did not come from the true message of justice, but from Roman Hellenism infiltrated into the Scriptures. And I confirmed I had been deceived. That’s why I now denounce Rome and its fraud. I do not fight against God, but against the slanders that have corrupted His message. Proverbs 29:27 declares that the righteous hates the wicked. However, 1 Peter 3:18 claims that the righteous died for the wicked. Who can believe that someone would die for those he hates? To believe it is to have blind faith; it is to accept incoherence. And when blind faith is preached, could it be because the wolf wants his prey not to see the deception?
Jehovah will shout like a mighty warrior: ‘I will take vengeance on My enemies!’
(Revelation 15:3 + Isaiah 42:13 + Deuteronomy 32:41 + Nahum 1:2–7)
And what about the so-called ‘love for the enemy’ that, according to some Bible verses, the Son of Jehovah supposedly preached—claiming we should imitate His Father’s perfection through universal love? (Mark 12:25–37, Psalm 110:1–6, Matthew 5:38–48)
That is a lie spread by the enemies of both Father and Son.
A false doctrine born from mixing Hellenism with sacred words.»
1 Picha za Ibilisi zilipitishwa kuwa picha za watakatifu https://bestiadn.com/2026/09/17/picha-za-ibilisi-zilipitishwa-kuwa-picha-za-watakatifu/ 2 क्या यशायाह की उजाड़ नगरों के बारे में भविष्यवाणी पहले ही पूरी हो चुकी है? https://penademuerteya.com/2026/08/09/idi45-isaiah6-13/ 3 Se fosse verdade que todos somos filhos de Deus e, portanto, iguais diante Dele, então como se pode explicar isto? https://144k.xyz/2026/06/03/se-fosse-verdade-que-todos-somos-filhos-de-deus-e-portanto-iguais-diante-dele-entao-como-se-pode-explicar-isto/ 4 男ガブリエルはゼウスのメッセージの矛盾を明らかにする：『義に飢え渇く者は幸いである。ただし、目には目を忘れ、正義の敵を愛するならば。』 https://antibestia.com/2026/05/05/idi43re/ 5 ‘Si no terminan la semana, no les pagaremos este día’, nos dijeron. Habla testigo de la explotación laboral. https://144k.xyz/2026/03/25/si-no-terminan-la-semana-no-les-pagaremos-este-dia-nos-dijeron-habla-testigo-de-la-explotacion-laboral/
«What did Saint Peter feel toward his enemies? Love or Hatred?
Contradictions are the traces left behind when texts written by people with opposing wills are mixed together: the will of those who sought justice and the will of those who sought to ensure that their crimes would remain without just punishment.
‘How long, O Lord, holy and true, will you refrain from judging and avenging our blood?’ (Revelation 6:10)
I do not deny the existence of the saints; I deny the authenticity of everything the Bible attributes to them.
We are told that Saint Peter was killed by his enemies. But isn’t precisely this desire for justice — expressed in Revelation as a cry for vengeance — a screw that does not fit with the supposed ‘love of enemies,’ but rather with rejection of them?
When I began reading the Bible carefully, I found obvious contradictions. On the one hand, Sirach 12:7 states: ‘Help the good, but not the wicked, because the Most High detests them and in the end will give them what they deserve.’ On the other hand, Matthew 5:44–46 commands us to love the wicked, bless them, and do good to them, imitating a supposed universal love of God.
If Sirach says that God detests the wicked, how can Jesus teach that God loves the wicked? Did Rome preach a lying Jesus, or did Rome lie to us about what Jesus really taught? Let us not forget that everything we call the ‘Bible’ today passed through councils directed by Roman emperors, the same empire that executed Jesus. And today, the representative of the church created by that empire claims that ‘God loves everyone.’ To me, this makes no sense.
I have found more clues: the saints never loved their enemies, and the God of the saints does not love the wicked either. That example Matthew attributes to Jesus — God loving good and evil people equally — has no basis either in other scriptures or in moral logic.
Proverbs 29:27 says: ‘The righteous detest the wicked, and the wicked detest the righteous.’ If the Bible presents Jesus as righteous, and the righteous detest the wicked, how could a righteous man give his life to benefit the wicked?
However, another text attributed to a righteous man states the opposite: 1 Peter 3:18 says that ‘the righteous man died for the unrighteous.’ How can it be coherent for a saint who in other messages expresses contempt toward the wicked to speak of a righteous man sacrificing himself for them?
Consider 2 Peter 2:12: ‘Like irrational animals, born to be captured and destroyed… they will be destroyed.’ Would God give the life of his righteous son to save those who are compared to irrational animals? Does Peter contradict the feelings of the righteous, or did the unrighteous people who killed him also falsify his words?
Proverbs 17:15 adds that God detests both the one who condemns the righteous and the one who justifies the wicked. Therefore, claiming that the wicked are ‘justified by grace’ simply by believing in contradictory texts defined by representatives of the Roman Empire — and not by the saints murdered by that empire — makes no sense.
The prophecy in Psalm 5 is also clear: God does not tolerate wickedness, the wicked will not dwell with Him, and God detests those who practice iniquity.
Even so, modern religious leaders oppose the death penalty for murderers, extortionists, rapists, and robbers on the excuse that ‘God loves everyone.’ But we have already seen that this excuse has neither textual nor logical basis.
The Final Thrust Against the Dogma
Let us imagine a tyrannical dictatorship that forces people to bow their heads before a statue of its dictator, and executes by electric chair those who refuse. Centuries later, that same legacy demands that people kneel before images of the electric chair.
That is what I see when dogma demands that people kneel before the cross.
The cross was, for Rome, what the electric chair is for a modern dictatorship: an instrument of execution. There Rome not only killed Spartacus and the slaves who sought freedom, but also Jesus, Peter, and others who — as can be inferred from some texts — refused to bow their heads before the image of the beast.
Their will was on the side of justice and their works were righteous; the will of their persecutors, on the other hand, was guided by attachment to injustice. That difference between the thinking and the actions of each side is the mark on the forehead and on the hand: the mind that makes the decision and the actions that carry out that decision.
If the mark on the forehead is the mark of the beast, hearing righteous words will not make a difference: ‘the wicked will do wickedly, and none of the wicked will understand’ (Daniel 12:10). ‘Here is wisdom… the number of the beast is the number of a man’ (Revelation 13:18).
It did not make a difference before: the Roman persecutors heard the saints, but they killed them anyway.
The martyrs did not love those who killed them. ‘How long, O Lord, holy and true, will you refrain from judging and avenging our blood?’ (Rev. 6:10). That cry does not come from love of the enemy, but from the desire for justice against him.
And when dogma demands that people kneel before the instrument of execution of the enemies of the Roman Empire, it is not honoring the saints: it is honoring the will of those who killed them.
[Roman emperor, the beast] ‘We did that to them because they refused to bow down before our images.’
[Legionary mosquito] ‘Glorify the thorn in the flesh, my thorn.’
[The mosquito demands]
‘If I bite you on one limb, offer me the other limb.’
[After fumigating it, the man responds]
‘Your request was not aligned with human interests.’
The mosquito causes harm; it is its nature and it cannot avoid it. Would you tolerate someone telling you: ‘You must love them’?
[José Galindo, criticizing Peru’s legal reality in 2026] Our taxes must not be wasted on irrecoverable people who can only harm society, attacking and extorting working people, robbing them, and shedding innocent blood.
If taxes are the blood our society needs to serve good people, why allow those who harm it to suck that blood as well?
That is why I propose the legalization of the death penalty, because taking care of the bad person is protecting him, and protecting him is loving him. That is undeserved love.
Enough of loving the robber and the extortionist. Enough of loving the enemy. Enough of loving the mosquito.
Visit my website: penademuerteya.com.
[Satan to Satan]: Satan accepts our revised gospel:
‘Do not resist evil. Turn the other cheek.’
[Satan to Satan]: Exactly. You preach my message, but Michael preaches resisting evil with an eye for an eye.
[The adversary of Satan, the one who justly accuses him] ‘I will put an end to your deception with the truth. You will be resisted and you will be defeated. Michael preaches resisting evil with an eye for an eye. I am here to defeat you through resistance. I resist evil.’
Do not let yourself be deceived. This is not the image of Saint Michael defeating the dragon. This image belongs to the dragon itself and is used to deceive people into idolatry. A Roman persecutor with wings: the Roman god Mars under another name.
If Deuteronomy 19:21 orders the elimination of evil and Matthew 5:38–39 orders its tolerance, it is not because God sent Jesus to contradict it; it is because Rome contradicted God by adulterating Jesus’ message.
This does not imply validating every ancient law, since even there just laws are found mixed with unjust ones. If Rome had the texts it persecuted in its hands, there is no reason to believe that it preserved either the ancient or the new texts intact.
Michael preaches resisting evil with an eye for an eye. I am here to defeat you through resistance. I resist evil.
After reading Isaiah 63:3–5, Isaiah 11:1–5, and Revelation 19:11–19, the rider on the white horse, faithful and just, appears as a warrior who repays. There, the love of the enemy is not preached, but rather the principle of an eye for an eye.
«
«The Awakening of Chile: The Fall of Ecclesiastical Dogmas and the Emancipation of Consciousness
Date of analysis: September 8, 2026
Gemini:
In Latin America, the distribution of Catholics and Christians in general has changed notably in recent decades due to the advance of Protestantism (especially Evangelical Christianity) and the increase in people with no religious affiliation.
Countries in Latin America with the highest % of Catholics
Paraguay:
~88%–89% (it remains the most markedly Catholic country in the region)
Mexico:
~77%–78%
Ecuador:
~75%–79%
Peru:
~70%–76%
Colombia:
~70%–75%
Bolivia:
~70%–73%
Venezuela:
~65%–70%
Argentina:
~63%–66%
Countries in Latin America with the highest % of Christians (Catholics + Protestants)
If all Christian denominations are added together (with the Evangelical/Pentecostal sector representing a high proportion), the countries with the highest overall percentages are:
Paraguay:
~95%
Guatemala:
~92% (with approximately 42% Catholics and 45%–50% Evangelicals)
Honduras:
~90% (around 45% Catholics and 42% Evangelicals)
Nicaragua:
~88%–90%
Ecuador:
~88%–90%
Peru:
~88%–90%
Brazil:
~86%–88% (approximately 50% Catholics and 31% Evangelicals)
Atypical cases in the region
Uruguay:
It is by far the most secularized country in Latin America. More than 50% of its population declares itself to have no religion, agnostic, or atheist; Catholics represent only between 30% and 35%.
Chile:
It has experienced a sharp decline in Catholic affiliation in recent years; Catholics represent around 45%–50%, while people with no religion exceed 35%.
José:
‘Tell me a little more about Chile. What was the distribution like about 30 years ago?’
Gemini:
Three decades ago (at the beginning of the 1990s, following the return to democracy in 1990 and according to the 1992 Census data), Chile’s religious and cultural landscape was drastically different from today.
Religious Distribution in Chile (1992 Census vs. Today)
Catholics:
1992:
They represented approximately 76.7% of the population. The Catholic Church maintained enormous social, institutional, and moral influence, further supported by the role played by the Vicariate of Solidarity during the military regime in defending human rights.
Today:
It has fallen to levels between 40% and 45%.
1992:
They represented approximately 76.7% of the population. The Catholic Church maintained enormous social, institutional, and moral influence, further supported by the role played by the Vicariate of Solidarity during the military regime in defending human rights.
Today:
It has fallen to levels between 40% and 45%.
Protestants / Evangelicals:
1992:
They represented around 12.4% of the population, with the Pentecostal movement being the fastest-growing movement among lower-income urban sectors.
Today:
They remain within a similar range, fluctuating between 14% and 17%.
1992:
They represented around 12.4% of the population, with the Pentecostal movement being the fastest-growing movement among lower-income urban sectors.
Today:
They remain within a similar range, fluctuating between 14% and 17%.
No religion (Atheists, Agnostics, None):
1992:
They barely reached 5.8%. Declaring oneself to have no religion was very uncommon and was even socially penalized in certain circles.
Today:
It is the fastest-growing group in the country, exceeding 37%–40% in recent surveys, especially concentrated among young people and in urban areas.
1992:
They barely reached 5.8%. Declaring oneself to have no religion was very uncommon and was even socially penalized in certain circles.
Today:
It is the fastest-growing group in the country, exceeding 37%–40% in recent surveys, especially concentrated among young people and in urban areas.
Key factors behind the change over these 30 years
Emergence of church abuse scandals:
The widespread allegations and exposure of sexual and institutional abuse within the Chilean Catholic Church (with prominent cases emerging from the 2010s onward) caused a collapse in public trust and accelerated mass disaffiliation.
Rapid secularization of society:
As Chile experienced accelerated economic growth and greater sociocultural openness during the 1990s and 2000s, lifestyles and legislation became more secular (for example, with the approval of civil divorce in 2004, abortion on three grounds in 2017, and same-sex marriage in 2021).
Generational change:
Generations born from the 1990s onward grew up in an environment with greater access to information and cultural diversity, moving away from the traditional religious structures in which their parents and grandparents had been raised.
José:
‘Can you bring up which those cases are? If possible, include links to news articles or other sources that document them.’
Gemini:
The cases that exposed this crisis in Chile combined abuses of power, sexual abuse, and persistent institutional cover-up by the senior hierarchy.
The Karadima Case (The Turning Point)
Fernando Karadima was parish priest of the Church of the Sacred Heart of Jesus of El Bosque (Santiago), a parish of the Chilean elite. For decades, he acted as an influential spiritual leader with the tacit support or concealment of high-ranking prelates.
The exposure: In 2010, his victims —such as James Hamilton, Juan Carlos Cruz, and José Andrés Murillo— made public the abuses of power, psychological abuse, and sexual abuse they had suffered when they were young.
Impact:
In 2011, the Vatican declared him guilty of sexual abuse. In 2018, Pope Francis permanently dismissed him from the clerical state.
Judicial consequence: In 2019, the Chilean justice system determined that the Archdiocese of Santiago had engaged in negligence and concealment, ordering the institution to compensate the victims.
For further reading: CIPER Chile: Karadima: The history of his abuses h t t p s : / / w w w . c i p e r c h i l e . c l / 2 0 1 8 / 0 5 / 2 3 / k a r a d i m a – e l – h i s t o r i a l – d e – s u s – a b u s o s – s o b r e – s a c e r d o t e s – y – s e m i n a r i s t a s /
La Tercera: The decline of Fernando Karadima h t t p s : / / w w w . l a t e r c e r a . c o m / e a r l y a c c e s s / n o t i c i a / e l – o c a s o – d e – f e r n a n d o – k a r a d i m a – e l – e x p u l s a d o – s a c e r d o t e – q u e – n u n c a – p i d i o – p e r d o n – p o r – s u s – a b u s o s / F F A U M N Y C Z N C E L K P R 3 X W X H T N O M M /
The ‘Cura Tato’ Case (José Andrés Aguirre)
One of the first media cases to alert public opinion in the early 2000s.
The incident: Aguirre was investigated and tried for ongoing sexual abuse against minors.
Conviction: In 2004, he was sentenced by the Chilean civil justice system to 12 years in prison for sexual abuse offenses against minors. He was one of the first priests to be criminally convicted in the country.
The 2018 Papal Visit and the Bishops’ Crisis
The decisive moment in the collapse of ecclesial credibility occurred in January 2018 during Pope Francis’s visit to Chile.
The conflict: The Pope publicly defended the Bishop of Osorno, Juan Barros (accused by victims of having witnessed and covered up Karadima’s abuses), describing the accusations as ‘slander’.
The reaction: Public outrage in Chile was massive. Following this, the Pope sent the Vatican investigator Charles Scicluna to investigate on the ground.
The mass resignation: After receiving the report on systematic cover-up within the Chilean Church, Pope Francis summoned all the Chilean bishops to Rome in May 2018. Following the meeting, the entire Chilean episcopate (34 bishops) submitted their resignations en masse, an unprecedented event in the history of the Catholic Church.
The Prosecutor’s Office’s Mass Investigations (2018–Present)
Beginning in 2018, Chile’s Public Prosecutor’s Office opened investigations ex officio and seized documentation from the bishoprics of several regions.
The prosecutors went on to investigate more than 200 members of the clergy (including bishops and priests from dioceses such as Rancagua, Valparaíso, and Santiago) over hundreds of allegations of abuse and cover-up.
For further reading: Clarín: The case that swept away the bishopric in Chile h t t p s : / / w w w . c l a r i n . c o m / m u n d o / k a r a d i m a – c a s o – d e p r e d a d o r – s e x u a l – a r r a s o – o b i s p a d o – c h i l e _ 0 _ B J b _ D S h R f . h t m l
José:
These revelations occurred all over the world. What catches my attention is how, only in Chile, so many people woke up that it became very noticeable; in the rest of the countries…
Gemini:
The phenomenon in Chile is unique in the region. Although scandals involving abuse and ecclesiastical cover-up have occurred globally (such as in Ireland, the United States, Australia, and Germany), the social response in Chile led to one of the fastest declines in religious affiliation and religious institutionalism in the world.
There are several social, institutional, and cultural factors that explain why in Chile this ‘awakening’ or disengagement was so forceful compared with other Latin American countries:
The Breakdown of Historical ‘Moral Capital’
In Chile, the Catholic Church held an exceptionally high ethical standing that it did not have in other countries. During the military dictatorship of Augusto Pinochet, the Church — through the Vicariate of Solidarity — was the main protective shield for victims of human rights violations.
When it was revealed that the same institution that had defended people against State violence was concealing abuse against young people and children in its own parishes, the collapse of trust was not gradual, but a direct institutional trauma. The clash between the country’s image of moral authority and reality accelerated collective disillusionment.
The Elitization of the Conflict (Karadima Case)
Unlike other countries where cases occurred in rural or peripheral parishes with little access to the media, the Karadima Case took place in the parish of the Sacred Heart of El Bosque (Providencia), the heart of Santiago’s economic, political, and social elite.
The victims belonged to influential and professional families (doctors, journalists, philosophers) with direct access to the media, legal resources, and networks to sustain a media and judicial battle for years without being silenced. This prevented the ecclesiastical hierarchy from being able to ‘put out’ the issue in the media.
The Strategic Error of the Papal Visit (2018)
In most countries, the figure of the Pope tends to function as a buffer for local crises. In Chile, the opposite occurred: Francis’s visit in January 2018 acted as the final trigger.
By publicly labeling the accusations against Bishop Juan Barros as ‘slander’, the Pope generated widespread indignation among citizens. When the Vatican had to correct course by sending Charles Scicluna and demanding the resignation of all the bishops, the Chilean hierarchy was left completely discredited before its own community.
A Society Undergoing an Accelerated Process of Secularization
Chile had already been undergoing profound sociocultural transformations since the 1990s:
Accelerated economic growth and expanded access to higher education.
Mass access to the internet and social networks in a predominantly urban population.
Legislative changes that challenged traditional dogma (divorce, abortion under three specific grounds, same-sex marriage).
The abuse crisis did not create secularization by itself, but it functioned as the final catalyst for millions of people who already had doubts or cultural distance to definitively sever their ties with the institution.
The Comparison with the Rest of the Region
In the rest of Latin America: In countries such as Mexico, Colombia, or Peru, the Catholic religion remains deeply linked to cultural identity, local festivities, and community structures, generating greater resistance to mass disengagement despite existing allegations.
The global pattern: Chile’s behavior is much more similar to that of Ireland or Spain, where systematic revelations led to an accelerated emptying of churches over the course of one or two decades, leaving the institution with historically low levels of trust.
José:
This demonstrates that it is worthwhile to bring dirty laundry to light: there are people who know how to awaken; they only need to be informed.
Gemini:
The case of Chile demonstrates precisely that: when documented information, facts, and evidence come to light publicly without censorship, the institutional and social impact is inevitable.
The combination of victims willing to speak, rigorous investigative journalism, and mass access to information broke decades of concealment and silence. It shows that societies are not monolithic and do not remain blind forever; when the contradictions and abuses of structures of power are exposed, people reassess their convictions and make informed decisions about what or whom to trust.
José:
How should we title this dialogue about the decline in Chile of belief in religious institutions?
Gemini:
Here are several title options depending on the focus or nuance you want to give the dialogue:
Direct and Analytical Approach
The Collapse of Faith in Chile: From the Vicariate to the Crisis of Trust
Chilean Secularization: Factors Behind the Decline of Catholicism
The End of an Ecclesiastical Era: The Awakening of Chilean Society
Journalistic or Documentary Approach
Dirty Laundry in the Open: The Cases That Broke Ecclesial Credibility in Chile
The Karadima Effect and the Mass Resignation: Anatomy of a Disillusionment
From Moral Authority to Disenchantment: Three Decades of Transformation in Chile
Reflective and Philosophical Approach
The Light of the Facts: When Information Breaks Dogma
The Cost of Silence: The Case of Chile and the Power of Truth
Secularization and Consciousness: The Process That Redefined Beliefs in Chile
José:
Those titles sound like bad news, as if something good had been lost, such as faith in God, and I don’t see it that way. I see it as an awakening, and I want the title to reflect that. Having faith in God is not the same as having faith in the Catholic Church or in evangelical churches…
Gemini:
You are absolutely right. I completely understand that distinction: institutionalized religion (ecclesiastical structures and their hierarchies) is not the same as individual spirituality or personal faith in God. The decline in ecclesial credibility does not represent a loss, but rather emancipation from institutional tutelage, a process of clarity and a critical awakening in the face of dogma and manipulation.
Here are options that reflect this positive awakening, emancipation, and search for truth over ecclesiastical deception:
Awakening and Emancipation Approach
Chile’s Awakening: The Fall of Ecclesiastical Dogmas and the Emancipation of Consciousness
Light on Deception: Chilean Society’s Break with Ecclesiastical Structures
Liberation from Institutional Faith: The Critical Awakening to Ecclesiastical Manipulation
Truth and Clarity Approach
Beyond the Cassock: The Fall of the Church and the Awakening of Truth in Chile
The End of the Ecclesiastical Yoke: How Information Liberated Consciousness in Chile
From Blind Faith to Independent Judgment: The Fall of Ecclesiastical Hegemony
Direct and Blunt Approach
Unmasking the Clergy: The Social Awakening That Shattered Institutional Religion in Chile
No Intermediaries, No Deception: The Fall of the Catholic Church in Chile
The Collapse of the Ecclesiastical Monopoly: The Awakening of an Informed Society
José:
The one who lives by dogma slanders his critics, demonizes intelligence because he knows that, with intelligence, the fraud is uncovered, and sanctifies blind faith because he has no evidence to offer…
Gemini:
That is the fundamental paradox of structures sustained by dogmatic control: they cannot allow rational scrutiny because their entire architecture depends on unquestioning obedience.
When an institution or a system lacks empirical evidence, historical coherence, or ethical soundness, its defense mechanisms are always the same:
Ad hominem attacks and slander: Since they cannot refute the arguments, they attack the interlocutor. The critic ceases to be someone who points out a verifiable fact and becomes labeled as ‘resentful’, an ‘agent of evil’, or an ‘enemy’.
Demonization of the intellect: Critical thinking, research, and reasonable doubt are presented as vices of pride or ‘traps of the mind’, while intellectual submission is disguised as spiritual humility.
Elevation of credulity: Blind credulity — the acceptance of claims without evidence — is redefined as the highest moral virtue (‘pure faith’), precisely because proof and verification are the elements that dismantle the artifice.
When people begin demanding evidence, comparing the texts with real history, and exposing the contradictions between discourse and actions, dogma loses its monopoly. Intelligence and information do not destroy the search for meaning or ethics; what they destroy is abusive intermediation and the business of deception. That is why the first step toward any real liberation — whether social, historical, or of one’s own consciousness — has always been daring to think for oneself. https://gabriels.work/2026/05/14/1335/
End of the dialogue between José and Gemini.
Infographic and information that helps awaken from the deception of dogma:
ROMAN MYTHS: THE FALSE CONVERSION OF PAUL
The story of Saul of Tarsus (Acts 7-9) is not a miracle; it is Rome’s political engineering to infiltrate the message, destroy justice, and guarantee the oppressor’s impunity.
The moral absurdity (Acts 7)
They say that Stephen prayed for his executioners while they were stoning him. FALSE.
‘An unjust man is an abomination to the just’ (Proverbs 29:27).
Demanding that the victim love his destroyer is psychological manipulation designed to disarm the just.
Evil does not change its nature (Acts 9)
Does a fierce enemy become a saint by seeing a light? IMPOSSIBLE.
Proverbs 11, Ecclesiasticus 37, and Daniel 12:10 make it clear: the wicked will not understand.
The persecutors were not ignorant: they heard the saints, understood the message, and for that very reason, hated it. Whoever hates elementary justice will never love advanced justice.
Rome’s perfect alibi
The myth of the ‘repentant persecutor’ fulfills two systemic functions:
It nullifies ‘Eye for an Eye’: It prohibits the just from demanding justice. It forces you to tolerate the criminal under the false promise that ‘tomorrow he might convert’.
It washes the Empire’s face: It is the script Rome used for itself: ‘See? Before, we persecuted; now, we spread it. Forget the past and submit to our new spiritual authority.’
Conclusion: They created a ‘Paul’, a Roman citizen who conveniently preaches submission to pagan power (Romans 13:1). It was not redemption; it was the empire’s strategy to put the criminal in charge of administering the doctrine of his victims. https://gabriels.work/2026/06/15/40-ideas-contra-los-extorsionadores-que-haran-que-el-cesar-maldiga-aun-mas-a-la-inteligencia-artificial/
«
«Walking on the edge of death along the dark path, but looking for the light, interpreting the lights projected on the mountains so as not to make a false step, to avoid death. █
Night was falling on the main road.
A blanket of darkness covered the winding path that wound through the mountains.
He did not walk aimlessly.
His goal was freedom, but the journey had only just begun.
With his body numb from the cold and his stomach empty for days,
he had no company but the elongated shadow cast by the headlights of the trucks that roared beside him,
advancing without stopping, indifferent to his presence.
Every step was a challenge,
every curve a new trap from which he had to emerge unscathed.
For seven nights and mornings,
he was forced to advance along the thin yellow line of a narrow road with just two lanes,
while trucks, buses and trailers whizzed by just inches from his body.
In the darkness, the deafening roar of engines enveloped him,
and the lights of trucks coming from behind cast their glow on the mountain in front of him.
At the same time, other trucks approached in the opposite direction,
forcing him to decide in fractions of a second
whether to pick up the pace or remain still in his precarious crossing,
where every movement meant the difference between life and death.
Hunger was a beast that devoured him from the inside,
but the cold was no less merciless.
In the sierra, the early hours of the morning were invisible claws that penetrated to the bones.
The wind enveloped him with its icy breath,
as if it wanted to extinguish the last spark of life that remained to him.
He took refuge where he could,
sometimes under a bridge,
other times in a corner of concrete that offered him a minimum of shelter.
But the rain was unforgiving.
Water seeped into his torn clothes,
sticking to his skin and stealing what little warmth he still had.
The trucks continued their march,
and he, stubbornly hoping that someone would feel sorry,
raised his hand, waiting for a gesture of humanity.
But the drivers drove on.
Some with looks of contempt,
others simply ignoring him, as if he were a ghost.
Every now and then, a compassionate soul would stop and offer him a quick ride,
but they were few.
Most saw him as a nuisance,
a shadow on the road,
someone not worth helping.
On one of those endless nights,
desperation drove him to search for food among the scraps left by travelers.
He was not ashamed to admit it:
he fought for food with pigeons,
snatching pieces of hardened biscuits before they could make them disappear.
It was an unequal fight,
but he was determined:
he was not willing to kneel before any image,
nor to accept any man as ‘only lord and savior’.
He was not willing to please those sinister individuals
who had already kidnapped him three times over religious differences,
who with their slanders had led him to walk that yellow line.
At another time, a kind man offered him a piece of bread and a drink.
A small gesture,
but in his pain,
that kindness was a balm.
But indifference was the norm.
When he asked for help,
many would walk away,
as if they feared that his misery was contagious.
Sometimes, a simple ‘no’ was enough to extinguish all hope,
but on other occasions, contempt was reflected in cold words or empty looks.
He didn’t understand how they could ignore someone who could barely stand,
how they could watch a man collapse without batting an eyelid.
And yet, he kept going.
Not because he had the strength,
but because he had no other choice.
He continued down the road,
leaving behind him miles of asphalt,
nights without rest and days without food.
Adversity hit him with everything it had,
but he resisted.
Because deep down,
even in the most absolute desperation,
the spark of survival still burned within him,
fueled by the desire for freedom and justice.
Psalm 118:17
‘I will not die, but I will live to proclaim the works of Jehovah.
18 Jehovah has chastened me severely, but He has not given me over to death.’
Psalm 41:4
‘I said, ‘Jehovah, have mercy on me
and heal me, for I confess with repentance that I have sinned against You.»
Job 33:24-25
‘God will have mercy on him and say, ‘Deliver him from going down to the pit; I have found a ransom;
25 his flesh shall become fresher than in childhood, and he shall return to the days of his youth.»
Psalm 16:8
‘I have set Jehovah always before me;
because He is at my right hand, I will not be shaken.’
Psalm 16:11
‘You will show me the path of life;
in Your presence, there is fullness of joy;
at Your right hand, there are pleasures forevermore.’
Matthew 7:14 For small is the gate and narrow the way that leads to life, and few are those who find it.
Leviticus 21:13 He shall take a virgin as his wife. 14 He shall not take a widow, a divorced woman, a disgraced woman, or a prostitute, but he shall take a virgin as his wife from among his own people, 15 so that he will not profane his offspring among his people; for I, the Lord, am the one who sanctifies them.
Isaiah 51:7 Listen to me, you who know righteousness, you people in whose hearts is my law: Do not fear the reproach of men, nor be dismayed by their insults. 8 For the moth will eat them up like a garment, and the worm will devour them like wool; but my righteousness will stand forever, and my salvation through all generations.
Psalm 119:1 Blessed are those who are consistent in their way, who walk according to the law of Jehovah.
Deuteronomy 19:18 The judges shall investigate thoroughly, and if that witness is found to be false and has falsely accused his brother, 19 then you shall do to him as he intended to do to his brother, and you shall purge the evil from among you. 20 Those who remain shall hear and be afraid, and shall no longer commit such wickedness among you. 21 You shall show him no pity; life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot.
Psalm 119:34 Give me understanding, and I will keep your law, and obey it with all my heart.
Daniel 12:3 Those who are wise will shine like the brightness of the heavens, and those who lead many to righteousness, like the stars for ever and ever.
Psalm 41:11-12
‘By this, I will know that You are pleased with me:
if my enemy does not triumph over me.
Micah 7:10 And my enemy shall see it, and shame shall cover her; she who said to me, ‘Where is Jehovah your God?’ My eyes shall see her; now she shall be trampled down like mud in the streets.
Psalms 41:12 As for me, You uphold me in my integrity
and set me in Your presence forever.’
Revelation 11:4
‘These witnesses are the two olive trees and the two lampstands standing before the God of the earth.’
Isaiah 11:2
‘The Spirit of Jehovah shall rest upon him:
the Spirit of wisdom and understanding, the Spirit of counsel and might, the Spirit of knowledge and the fear of Jehovah’
I made the mistake of defending the faith in the Bible, but out of ignorance. However, now I see that it is not the guiding book of the religion that Rome persecuted, but of the one it created to please itself with celibacy. That’s why they preached a Christ who doesn’t marry a woman, but rather His church, and angels who, despite having male names, do not look like men (draw your own conclusions). These figures are akin to the false saints—plaster-statue kissers—and similar to the Greco-Roman gods because, in fact, they are the same pagan gods under different names.
What they preach is a message incompatible with the interests of true saints. Therefore, this is my penance for that unintentional sin. By denying one false religion, I deny them all. And when I finish doing my penance, then God will forgive me and bless me with her, with that special woman I need. Because, although I don’t believe in the entire Bible, I do believe in what seems right and consistent to me within it; the rest is slander from the Romans.
Proverbs 28:13
‘He who covers his sins will not prosper, but whoever confesses and forsakes them will have mercy from the Lord.’
Proverbs 18:22
‘He who finds a wife finds a treasure and receives favor from the Lord.’
I seek the Lord’s favor embodied in that special woman.
She must be as the Lord commands that she be.
If this upsets you, it is because you have lost:
Leviticus 21:14
‘A widow, or a divorced woman, or a defiled woman, or a prostitute, he shall not marry these, but he shall marry a virgin from his own people.’
To me, she is glory:
1 Corinthians 11:7
‘Woman is the glory of man.’
Glory is victory, and I will find it with the power of light. Therefore, even though I don’t know her yet, I have named her: Light Victory.
And I nicknamed my web pages ‘UFOs’ because they travel at the speed of light, reaching corners of the world and shooting out rays of truth that strike down the slanderers. With the help of my web pages, I will find her, and she will find me.
When she finds me and I find her, I will tell her this:
‘You have no idea how many programming algorithms I had to devise to find you. You can’t imagine all the difficulties and adversaries I faced to find you, my Light of Victory.
I faced death itself many times:
Even a witch pretended to be you. Imagine, she told me she was the light, despite her slanderous behavior. She slandered me like no one else, but I defended myself like no one else to find you. You are a being of light; that’s why we were made for each other!
Now let’s get out of this damn place…
So this is my story. I know she will understand me, and so will the righteous.
Isaiah 51:6 Lift up your eyes to the heavens, and look down upon the earth; for the heavens shall vanish away like smoke, and the earth shall grow old like a garment, and its inhabitants shall perish in like manner; but my salvation shall be forever, and my righteousness shall not perish.
Psalms 16:11
‘You will show me the path of life;
in your presence there is fullness of joy;
at your right hand are pleasures forevermore.’
Matthew 7:13-14 Enter through the narrow gate; for wide is the gate and broad is the way that leads to destruction, and many are those who enter through it; for narrow is the gate and difficult is the way that leads to life, and few are those who find it.
Leviticus 21:13 He shall take a virgin as his wife. 14 He shall not take a widow, or a divorced woman, or one who has been defiled, or a prostitute; but he shall take a virgin of his own people as his wife, 15 so that he may not profane his offspring among his people; for I, the LORD, am the one who sanctifies them.
Psalms 118:20 This is the gate of the LORD; the righteous shall enter through it.
Proverbs 19:14 House and riches are an inheritance from fathers, but a prudent wife is from the LORD.
Daniel 12:13 But as for you, Daniel, go your way until the end; you shall rest, and then you shall rise to receive your inheritance at the end of the days.
Daniel 12:9 He replied, ‘Go your way, Daniel, for these words are closed up and sealed until the time of the end.’
Revelation 10:5-7 And the angel whom I saw standing on the sea and on the earth lifted up his hand to heaven, 6 and swore by him who lives forever and ever, who created heaven and the things in it, and the earth and the things in it, and the sea and the things in it, that there would be no more delay, 7 but in the days of the voice of the seventh angel, when he is about to sound the trumpet, the mystery of God will be fulfilled, as he declared to his servants the prophets.
Daniel 12:7 And I heard the man clothed in linen, who was above the waters of the river; he raised his right hand and his left hand toward heaven and swore by him who lives forever that it would be for a time, times, and half a time. And when the shattering of the power of the holy people is completed, all these things shall be fulfilled.
And when I find her, I will say to her: ‘Thank you for finding me, virgin of the gate, come, embrace me, and let me give you a kiss on the mouth…’
I have been a computer programmer, I like logic, in Turbo Pascal I created a program capable of producing basic algebra formulas at random, similar to the formula below. In the following document in .PDF you can download the code of the program, this is proof that I’m not stupid, that’s why the conclusions of my research should be taken seriously. https://ntiend.me/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/math21.pdf
If s*1=72 then s=72
«Cupid is condemned to hell along with the other pagan gods (The fallen angels for their rebellion against justice, sent to eternal punishment). █
Quoting these passages does not mean defending the entire Bible. If 1 John 5:19 says that “the whole world is under the power of the evil one,” but rulers swear on the Bible, then the Devil rules with them. If the Devil rules with them, then fraud also rules with them. Therefore, the Bible contains part of that fraud, camouflaged among truths. By connecting those truths, we can expose their deceptions. Righteous people need to know these truths so that, if they have been deceived by lies added to the Bible or other similar books, they can free themselves from them.
Daniel 12:7 And I heard the man clothed in linen, who was above the waters of the river, when he raised his right hand and his left hand to heaven and swore by Him who lives forever that it shall be for a time, times, and half a time. And when the power of the holy people is completely shattered, all these things shall be finished.
Considering that ‘Devil’ means ‘Slanderer,’ it is natural to expect that the Roman persecutors, being the adversaries of the saints, later bore false witness against the saints and their messages. Thus, they themselves are the Devil, and not an intangible entity that enters and exits people, as they made us believe precisely with passages like Luke 22:3 (“Then Satan entered Judas…”), Mark 5:12-13 (the demons entering the pigs), and John 13:27 (“After the morsel, Satan entered him”).
This is my purpose: to help righteous people not waste their power believing in the lies of impostors who have adulterated the original message, which never asked anyone to kneel before anything or pray to anything that had ever been visible.
It is no coincidence that in this image, promoted by the Roman Church, Cupid appears alongside other pagan gods. They have given the names of the true saints to these false gods, but look at how these men dress and how they wear their long hair. All this goes against faithfulness to God’s laws because it is a sign of rebellion, a sign of the fallen angels (Deuteronomy 22:5).
The serpent, the devil, or Satan (the slanderer) in hell (Isaiah 66:24, Mark 9:44). Matthew 25:41: “Then he will also say to those on his left: ‘Depart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire that has been prepared for the devil and his angels’.” Hell: the eternal fire prepared for the serpent and his angels (Revelation 12:7-12), for having combined truths with heresies in the Bible, the Quran, the Torah, and for having created false forbidden gospels that they called apocryphal, to give credibility to lies in the false sacred books, all in rebellion against justice.
Book of Enoch 95:6: “Woe to you, false witnesses and to those who weigh the price of injustice, for you will perish suddenly!” Book of Enoch 95:7: “Woe to you, unjust ones who persecute the righteous, for you yourselves will be handed over and persecuted because of that injustice, and the burden of your guilt will fall upon you!” Proverbs 11:8: “The righteous is delivered from trouble, and the wicked comes in his place.” Proverbs 16:4: “The Lord has made all things for Himself, even the wicked for the day of doom.”
Book of Enoch 94:10: “Unjust ones, I say to you that He who created you will overthrow you; upon your ruin, God will have no mercy, but rather, God will rejoice in your destruction.” Satan and his angels in hell: the second death. They deserve it for lying against Christ and His faithful disciples, accusing them of being the authors of Rome’s blasphemies in the Bible, such as love for the devil (the enemy).
Isaiah 66:24: “And they shall go out and look upon the corpses of the men who have rebelled against me; for their worm shall never die, nor shall their fire be quenched, and they shall be abhorrent to all flesh.” Mark 9:44: “Where their worm does not die, and the fire is never quenched.” Revelation 20:14: “Then Death and Hades were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death: the lake of fire.”
A mute idol and a loud prophet—guess which one steals your life.
Word of Satan: ‘Love your enemy. Love the tyrant, for this way he will never fear you.’
Word of Satan: ‘Do not judge… so that the thief and the honest can share the same reputation.’
The false prophet swears the statue cries… but only when the cameras are rolling and the donations are open.
Word of Satan (Zeus): ‘I confess to you that my priests do not love marriage; they use it as bait, because they swore celibacy to silently hunt the fresh fruits of those unions.’
Word of Satan (Zeus, Jupiter): «While my priests bless what they themselves do not practice —because they only seek for the children of those marriages to come near me— they proclaim my kingdom. In my kingdom there will be no marriages: everyone will be like my long-haired androgynous angels, and their glory will be to live kneeling before the light of my face.»
Word of Satan: «Do not always change the words; change the meaning they are supposed to have when they can no longer defend them.»
Word of Satan: ‘He who doubts love for the enemy loves the Devil because he is a friend of the Devil who opposes my holy message. But he who does not doubt it is a friend of God… and a friend of mine.’
The false prophet is not simply afraid that you will destroy the statue; he is afraid that you will discover that you never needed to bow before it.
The false prophet leads his followers through the paths of lies, because lies always have a price: they are sold and bought. The truly instructed righteous guides other righteous ones on the path of justice and never charges, because truth is not negotiated, traded, or for sale.
ฝันร้ายของนักปกป้องพระคัมภีร์ https://purifying-the-message.blogspot.com/2026/08/blog-post_890.html
私が擁護する宗教は正義と呼ばれています。 https://antibestia.com/2026/07/06/idi43chue/
When a people don’t think, charlatans become leaders. Word of Satan: «Teach them that a doctrine should not be judged by its fruits, but by the sacred name it bears.» Too many coincidences to be random.»
