@JoseGalindoMMXXVI
hace 12 segundos Demanding his followers to compare him to others and declaring himself as the supreme center of existence (‘I am the all… split a piece of wood, I am there; lift up the stone, and you will find me there’) hardly reflects the humility of a righteous man who seeks to bring truth to the humble so that they worship the Creator alone—especially when paired with a visual image modeled after the Greek god Zeus. It is deeply ironic that those who refused to eat pork were tortured and killed by a Greek king who worshipped Zeus, yet centuries later, Rome hands us a figure in that exact same likeness, speaking with grandiosity and declaring that ‘one may eat anything.’ Both the New Testament and the Gospel of Thomas endorse the consumption of all foods. This exposes Thomas not as a threat to Rome, but as a ‘false prohibition’—a controlled text designed to reinforce the same imperial permissiveness regarding pork (Thomas 14) while insulting the memory of the Maccabean martyrs. To be clear: I am not defending the Old Testament over the New, nor do I claim that truth lies in the Mosaic law—both testaments passed through Roman filters and are a mixture of truth and imperial manipulation.
Commented on video:
Jesus Said | Secret Sayings of Jesus | Gospel of Thomas Saying : 13 #deadseascrolls
«Zeus, I compare you with the Devil, I compare you with yourself; you do not deceive me. I will not worship you, nor your image, nor praise your teaching. Go and fool the foolish, not the righteous.»
The Gospel of Thomas and the Hidden Deception About Pork █
Pointing out contradictions in the New Testament regarding the Law and the Prophets does not make me a defender of the Old Testament. I defend neither testament, nor do I defend either book of the Bible in its entirety against the other. Therefore, I have serious moral objections to many things attributed to the Law of Moses, such as circumcision, as well as to teachings attributed to Jesus, such as the command to love one’s enemies. I cannot trust the integrity of texts transmitted by an empire that persecuted and killed people for defending messages that the Roman Empire found intolerable. If Rome showed so little respect for their lives, why should I assume it respected the integrity of their message—including the ancient scriptures, the very roots of the tree, that they upheld?
The Gospel of Thomas and the Hidden Deception About Pork
Since we find this same permissiveness toward eating pork even in the Gospel of Thomas, can we be sure that it was genuinely one of the texts Rome banned because it made them uncomfortable? Or was it rather a false-flag gospel designed to distract us and reinforce the lie?
Many things here don’t add up.
Matthew 5:17: «Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.»
Luke 10:8
Whatever city you enter and they receive you, eat what is set before you.
Gospel of Thomas (14)
When you go into any land and walk about in the districts, if they receive you, eat that they will set before you,…
For what goes into your mouth will not defile you, but that which issues from your mouth — it is that which will defile you.
Matthew 15:11
What goes into someone’s mouth does not defile them, but what comes out of their mouth, that is what defiles them.
The Law: Deuteronomy 14:8
«And the pig, although it has a split hoof, does not chew the cud; it is unclean for you. You shall not eat its flesh or touch its carcass.»
The Prophets: Isaiah 66:17
«Those who sanctify and purify themselves to go into the gardens, following one in the midst, eating pig’s flesh and the abomination and the mouse, shall come to an end together, declares the LORD.»
If Baked Pork Could Speak to the Deceivers: «Didn’t Yahweh Forbid His People to Eat Me? Why Do You Deceive Them?»
Around 167 BC,
a king who worshiped Zeus sought to force the Jews
to eat pork.
Antiochus IV Epiphanes threatened with death
those who obeyed the law of Yahweh:
‘You shall not eat anything abominable.’
Seven men preferred to die under torture
rather than violate that law.
(2 Maccabees 7)
They died believing
that God would give them eternal life
for not betraying His commandments.
Centuries later, Rome tells us
that Jesus appeared teaching:
‘What goes into the mouth
does not defile a man.’
(Matthew 15:11)
And then we are told:
‘Nothing is unclean
if it is received with thanksgiving.’
(1 Timothy 4:1–5)
Did those righteous men die for nothing?
Is it just to invalidate the law
for which they gave their lives?
There is more.
The law of the God of Moses forbade the worship of images and detached God from any visual representation (Deuteronomy 4:15–19).
However, Rome introduced a human image for worship,
taken from the Hellenistic world,
identical to that of Zeus.
Then Hebrews 1:6 appears,
commanding worship toward a man.
But the original text, in Psalm 97,
directs that worship only to Yahweh.
Compare:
1 Corinthians 10:27
and Luke 10:8
teach that one may eat
whatever is set before him,
without asking questions.
But Deuteronomy 14:3–8 is explicit:
the pig is unclean;
you shall not eat it.
Jesus is presented as saying:
‘I have not come
to abolish the Law or the Prophets,
but to fulfill them.’
Then the question arises:
how does one ‘fulfill’ a law
by declaring clean
what that same law calls unclean?
The prophecies of Isaiah about the final judgment
(Isaiah 65 and Isaiah 66:17)
maintain the condemnation
of the consumption of pork.
How can one claim to respect the prophets
while contradicting their messages?
If the texts of the Bible
passed through the Roman filter,
and that empire persecuted the righteous,
why believe
that everything in it
is truth and justice?
Who is the other Jesus, and what is that other gospel we were warned about?
Image on the right: The face of the statue of Zeus in the Vatican. Do you still believe that the image on the left, on the Shroud of Turin, truly reflects the face of Jesus?
2 Corinthians 11:4 For if someone comes and preaches another Jesus, whom we have not preached… “The true Jesus had short hair”!!
1 Corinthians 11:14 Does not even nature itself teach you that it is dishonorable for a man to grow his hair long?
Galatians 1:9 As we have said before, so now I say again: If anyone preaches to you a “different gospel” from what you have received, “let him be accursed” (Faithful to the true gospel, Paul has cursed his enemies).
Where is “bless those who curse you” applied here?
Zeus says: “Rome stopped worshiping my image and following my ways; now it follows the one who denied me. Why does his image look so much like mine, and why does his path demand that they love me… even though I am the enemy?”
Teaching of Cleobulus of Lindos:
“Do good to your friends and your enemies…”
Teaching of Jesus?
Matthew 5:44 … do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who mistreat you and persecute you…
The war in heaven explained as it is not possible to explain it if everything in the Bible is accepted as truth.
Revelation 12:7 And war broke out in heaven: Michael and his angels fought with the dragon; and the dragon and his angels fought.
Heaven:
Hosea 6:2 After two days He will revive us; on the third day He will raise us up, that we may live in His sight.
Daniel 12:2 And many of those who sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life…
Psalms 118:6 Jehovah is on my side; I will not fear. What can man do to me?
7 Jehovah is for me among those who help me; therefore I shall see my desire on those who hate me.
Without love for the enemy, did you notice the detail in Psalms 118:7?
It is prophecy, it is the feeling of the righteous:
Psalms 118:20 This is the gate of Jehovah, through which the righteous shall enter.
So, where does the doctrine of loving one’s enemies come from?
That doctrine does not come from Jesus; it comes from the dragon, from the enemy who attributed that teaching, loaded with injustice, to Jesus.
The dragon deceives the world with this and other lies; the dragon defends all religions that demand bowing down before someone or something, but that someone or something is not God, because God is eternal, invisible, and untouchable.
The beast, which is the false prophet, by rendering service to the dragon, demands worship of the «image of the beast,» and when people worship its image, they also worship it and the dragon.
The beast says that man killed God because God came as a man.
But God does not need to come as a man to understand what righteous men feel…
God does not need to come as a creature to understand how the wicked think…:
Isaiah 29:16 Surely your turning of things upside down shall be esteemed as the potter’s clay; for shall the work say of him who made it, «He did not make me»? Or shall the thing formed say of him who formed it, «He did not understand»?
Daniel 12:7 Then I heard the man clothed in linen, who was above the waters of the river, when he held up his right hand and his left hand to heaven, and swore by Him who lives forever,
God never came as a man, nor can He ever die…
The beast looks for excuses to claim that the tangible creature should be honored by the bent knees of the people.
The beast slanders its critics; the beast truly believes that God does not exist, because if it believed He existed, it would fear His punishment and would not utter insolences against the truth.
There is no one righteous among those who speak contradictions, because the righteous love the truth and denounce incoherence, even though the deceived peoples call them «sacred»…
Psalms 14:1 The fool has said in his heart, «There is no God.» They are corrupt, they have done abominable works; there is none who does good.
Those who are capable of not bowing down before anything or anyone to worship that invisible and untouchable God are the ones who will emerge victorious over «the beast and its image.»
Will they be able to defeat the beast if they love the beast?
If the beast is their enemy, will they defeat the beast by loving the beast?
Justice never does good to everyone; the thief is punished and the booty is taken away from him while the owner recovers what is theirs; some weep under justice, while others laugh under justice.
Revelation 19:11 Now I saw heaven opened, and behold, a white horse. And He who sat on him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness He judges and makes war.
Revelation 19:19 And I saw the beast, the kings of the earth, and their armies gathered together to make war against Him who sat on the horse and against His army.
Revelation 15:2 And I saw something like a sea of glass mingled with fire, and those who have the victory over the beast, over its image and over the number of his name, standing on the sea of glass, having harps of God.
Isaiah 65:13 Therefore thus says Jehovah the Lord: «Behold, My servants shall eat, but you shall be hungry; behold, My servants shall drink, but you shall be thirsty; behold, My servants shall rejoice, but you shall be ashamed;
14 Behold, My servants shall sing for joy of heart, but you shall cry for sorrow of heart, and wail for grief of spirit.
Isaiah 65:17 «For behold, I create new heavens and a new earth; and the former shall not be remembered or come to mind.
Word of Satan: ‘Blessed are the poor… for in their misery they will find comfort in the empty promises of my priests, promises they will never see fulfilled.’ When statues are honored, the business of those who profit from the lie is honored. Once you see it, you can’t unsee it. , CBA 71[416] 90 78 , 0017
│ English │ #OBHU
The Mystery of 1998 and My Testimony | REVELATION: THE BOOKS ARE OPENED. (Video language:Spanish) /272/ https://youtu.be/14sUOuTSv0k,
Day 228
The Way Out of the Labyrinth of Dogma and the Righteous Who Leave So They Are Not Trapped Forever. (Video language:Indonesian) /330/ https://youtu.be/YbyfqSAx3pU
«The Prophecies of Isaiah That Challenge the Religions Created Through Deception by the Roman Empire
Christianity, Islam, and the Uncomfortable Prophecy for RomeTHE COMMON DOGMA(Christianity and Islam)
Christianity and Islam claim that Gabriel announced the virgin birth of Jesus to fulfill Isaiah’s prophecy (Matthew 1 / Quran 19).
But Isaiah 7:14–16 does not announce Jesus, nor does it speak of a ‘perpetual virgin.’
The sign was given to King Ahaz and was to be fulfilled immediately, before the child knew how to distinguish between good and evil.
Isaiah speaks of a young woman, not of a woman who remained a virgin after childbirth.
The fulfillment occurs with Hezekiah, a faithful king during the time of Ahaz:
He destroys the bronze serpent (2 Kings 18:4–7)
God was with him (Immanuel)
Assyrian defeat prophesied by Isaiah (2 Kings 19:35–37)
The perpetual virgin birth, shared by Christianity and Islam, does not come from Isaiah, but from a later rereading imposed by Rome.
These contradictions do not come from God. A tyrannical empire did not want peoples who demanded respect for their dignity, but peoples on their knees.
Here is the detail of how, according to the biblical texts, Isaiah’s prophecy about the virgin was fulfilled with King Hezekiah.
Around 1440 BC, Jehovah commanded Moses to make a bronze serpent and set it on a pole so that anyone who looked at it would be healed; He never commanded that it be honored, prayed to, or used as an object of prayer or worship.
Context — Numbers 21:4–9The Israelites complained against God and Moses in the wilderness, and Jehovah sent fiery serpents that bit and killed many. God instructed Moses to make a bronze serpent and put it on a pole. Anyone who was bitten, if they looked at the bronze serpent, would live.
About seven centuries later, around 715 BC, King Hezekiah destroyed the bronze serpent because the people of Israel had begun to worship it, burning incense to it. This was a clear transgression of God’s law and its original purpose as a symbol of healing (Numbers 21:4–9), which is why Hezekiah removed it during his religious reforms, as related in 2 Kings 18:4.
The Assyrian army slept confidently.
The Rabshakeh had challenged Hezekiah, saying:
‘In what do you trust? No god has delivered any people from my hand’ (2 Kings 18:19–35).
Hezekiah went up to the temple and prayed to Jehovah, asking that His name be defended before the nations (2 Kings 19:14–19).
That night, Jehovah sent a single angel, who killed 185,000 Assyrian soldiers (2 Kings 19:35; Isaiah 37:36).
Sennacherib fled to Nineveh, humiliated and without an army (2 Kings 19:36).
This deliverance was not accidental. Isaiah had given an immediate sign to Ahaz: a young woman of his time would conceive, and before the child grew up, Judah would be delivered from its enemies (Isaiah 7:10–16).
Hezekiah, the son of Ahaz, sees that fulfillment (2 Kings 18–19).
«
«In Mark 3:29, the ‘sin against the Holy Spirit’ is warned as unforgivable. However, history and the practices of Rome reveal a shocking moral inversion: the truly unforgivable sin, according to their dogma, is questioning the credibility of their Bible. Meanwhile, serious crimes such as the killing of innocents have been ignored or justified under the same authority that claimed to be infallible. This post examines how this ‘unique sin’ was constructed and how the institution used it to protect its power while justifying historical injustices.
In purposes contrary to Christ is the Antichrist, if you read Isaiah 11 you will see the mission of Christ in his second life, and it is not to favor everyone but only the righteous, but the Antichrist is inclusive, despite being unjust, he wants to climb onto Noah’s Ark, despite being unjust he wants to leave Sodom with Lot… Happy are those to whom these words are not offensive. He who is not offended by this message, that one is righteous, congratulations to him: Christianity was created by the Romans, only a mind friendly to celibacy, proper of Greek and Roman leaders, enemies of the ancient Jews, could conceive a message like the one that says: ‘These are the ones who did not defile themselves with women, for they remained virgins. They follow the Lamb wherever he goes. They were purchased from among mankind and offered as firstfruits to God and to the Lamb’ in Revelation 14:4, or a message like this one which is similar: ‘For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like the angels of God in heaven,’ in Matthew 22:30, both messages sound as if they came from a Roman Catholic priest, and not from a prophet of God who seeks this blessing for himself: He who finds a wife finds what is good and receives favor from the Lord (Proverbs 18:22), Leviticus 21:14 A widow, or a divorced woman, or a woman who has been defiled, or a prostitute, he shall not marry; but he shall take as a wife a virgin from his own people.
I am not Christian; I am henotheist. I believe in one supreme God above all, and I believe that several created gods exist—some faithful, others deceivers. I only pray to the supreme God. But since I was indoctrinated from childhood in Roman Christianity, I believed in its teachings for many years. I applied those ideas even when common sense told me otherwise. For example—so to speak—I turned the other cheek to a woman who had already struck me on one. A woman who, at first, acted like a friend, but then, without justification, began treating me as if I were her enemy, with strange and contradictory behavior. Influenced by the Bible, I believed she had become an enemy because of some spell, and that what she needed was prayer to return to being the friend she had once shown herself to be (or pretended to be). But in the end, everything only got worse. As soon as I had the chance to dig deeper, I uncovered the lie and felt betrayed in my faith. I came to understand that many of those teachings did not come from the true message of justice, but from Roman Hellenism infiltrated into the Scriptures. And I confirmed I had been deceived. That’s why I now denounce Rome and its fraud. I do not fight against God, but against the slanders that have corrupted His message. Proverbs 29:27 declares that the righteous hates the wicked. However, 1 Peter 3:18 claims that the righteous died for the wicked. Who can believe that someone would die for those he hates? To believe it is to have blind faith; it is to accept incoherence. And when blind faith is preached, could it be because the wolf wants his prey not to see the deception?
Jehovah will shout like a mighty warrior: ‘I will take vengeance on My enemies!’
(Revelation 15:3 + Isaiah 42:13 + Deuteronomy 32:41 + Nahum 1:2–7)
And what about the so-called ‘love for the enemy’ that, according to some Bible verses, the Son of Jehovah supposedly preached—claiming we should imitate His Father’s perfection through universal love? (Mark 12:25–37, Psalm 110:1–6, Matthew 5:38–48)
That is a lie spread by the enemies of both Father and Son.
A false doctrine born from mixing Hellenism with sacred words.»
«
Where is the universal love of God in the final judgment? Rome, by inserting its lies to sell salvation, left contradictions in the message it canonized, because it mixed its false messages with the true ones; the result: a sea of contradictions. Look at this GIF: Matthew 25:41 ‘Then he will say to those on his left, Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels.’ HELL: THE ETERNAL FIRE PREPARED FOR THE DRAGON (THE DEVIL) AND HIS ANGELS (REVELATION 12:7–12) (FOR HAVING COMBINED TRUTHS WITH HERESIES IN THE BIBLE, THE QURAN, THE TORAH, AND THE APOCRYPHA IN REBELLION AGAINST JUSTICE). Book of Enoch 95:6 ‘Woe to you false witnesses and to those who weigh the price of injustice, for you will perish suddenly.’ Book of Enoch 95:7 ‘Woe to you unjust people who persecute the righteous, for you yourselves will be handed over and persecuted because of that injustice, and the weight of its burden will fall on you!’ Proverbs 11:8 ‘The righteous will be delivered from tribulation, and the unrighteous will enter in his place.’ Proverbs 16:4 ‘Jehovah has made all things for Himself, even the wicked for the day of evil.’ Book of Enoch 94:10 ‘I tell you, you unrighteous people, He who created you will overthrow you. God will have no mercy on your destruction, but will rejoice at your destruction.’ HELL ISAIAH 66:24 MARK 9:44 (Satan and his angels in Hell: the second death: they deserve it!) They deserve it for lying against Christ and his faithful disciples by accusing them of being the authors of Rome’s blasphemies in the Bible, such as loving the Devil (the enemy). The prophecy of hell in the book of Isaiah, the Psalms, Proverbs, and the book of Enoch contains messages that make it clear that God does not love His enemies. Who put false messages in the mouth of Christ if not His enemies? Mark 9:44 ‘Where their worm does not die, and the fire is not quenched.’ Revelation 20:14 ‘And Death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire. This is the second death, the lake of fire.’ Revelation 20:15 ‘And anyone not found written in the book of life was thrown into the lake of fire.’ (‘Whoever was not blessed by my words was sent to hell.’) Isaiah 66:24 ‘And they will come out and see the carcasses of the men who have rebelled against me; for their worm will not die, nor will their fire be quenched, and they will be an abomination to all mankind.’ In the didactic narrative in the image, one of the messengers protected by Jehovah says to one of those satanic angels: ‘Daniel 9:21 Gabriel is a man. Deuteronomy 22:5 God hates a man who dresses as a woman. 1 Corinthians 11:7 A man with hair like a woman is a disgrace. Therefore you are not an angel allied with Gabriel. You are an angel of Satan.’ The Hellenized image of Christ and the saints — inspired by Zeus and Cupid — reflects a biblical message distorted by Hellenistic influence, promoted by false Roman converts. This is the source of the pro-Hellenistic lies in the Bible. //83
Luke 19:12 said, then: ‘A nobleman went to a distant country to receive a kingdom and return… But his citizens hated him and sent a delegation after him, saying: We do not want this man to reign over us. And it came to pass that, when he returned, after receiving the kingdom (he rewards with justice those who did what is right, but…), and also those enemies of mine who did not want me to reign over them, bring them here and execute them before me.’ Where does the noble king love his enemies? Just as in the parable of the wicked tenants: there is no love for the enemies of the king (Psalm 2:4). //100
Same god Zeus, same forbidden food—pork—and devil doctrines passed off as Jesus and his religion. //57
The Devil’s Word: «Do not demonize my puppies, they are not dangerous, they only appear to be.» //403
What did Saint Peter feel toward his enemies? Love or Hatred? //1365
Successor of Saint Peter… or successor of the Caesars? //340
«
#N/D
«Do False Beggars and False Prophets Profit from False Teachings?
[LEGO-style satirical animation: false beggar on a bus]
‘Please, spare some plastic studs for a poor traveler!
I haven’t eaten a single brick all day!
I haven’t eaten a single brick all day!
Oh, my phone!’
‘Do good without looking at whom?
That must be the false beggar’s favorite phrase.
Give to anyone who asks you?
That is not good advice.
Did the Good Shepherd really say that…
or was it the message of the false converts of the empire that persecuted him?’
‘To anyone who asks you,
give…
the false beggar
will thank you.’
‘Deuteronomy 14:8
‘And the pig, because it has a split hoof but does not chew the cud, you shall detest it; its meat you shall not eat, and its carcass you shall not touch.»
‘Mark 7:19
‘For it doesn’t go into their heart but into their stomach, and then out of the body.’
Thus he declared all foods clean.’
‘Luke 6:30
‘To anyone who asks you for something, give it to him, and if anyone takes away what is yours, do not demand it back.»
‘Sirach 12:7
‘You should give to the good, but not to the wicked; give relief to the afflicted, but give nothing to the proud.»
‘How do these messages harmonize?
Do false prophets and false beggars profit from the belief in a false testimony?’
«
«The Awakening of Chile: The Fall of Ecclesiastical Dogmas and the Emancipation of Consciousness
Date of analysis: September 8, 2026
Gemini:
In Latin America, the distribution of Catholics and Christians in general has changed notably in recent decades due to the advance of Protestantism (especially Evangelical Christianity) and the increase in people with no religious affiliation.
Countries in Latin America with the highest % of Catholics
Paraguay:
~88%–89% (it remains the most markedly Catholic country in the region)
Mexico:
~77%–78%
Ecuador:
~75%–79%
Peru:
~70%–76%
Colombia:
~70%–75%
Bolivia:
~70%–73%
Venezuela:
~65%–70%
Argentina:
~63%–66%
Countries in Latin America with the highest % of Christians (Catholics + Protestants)
If all Christian denominations are added together (with the Evangelical/Pentecostal sector representing a high proportion), the countries with the highest overall percentages are:
Paraguay:
~95%
Guatemala:
~92% (with approximately 42% Catholics and 45%–50% Evangelicals)
Honduras:
~90% (around 45% Catholics and 42% Evangelicals)
Nicaragua:
~88%–90%
Ecuador:
~88%–90%
Peru:
~88%–90%
Brazil:
~86%–88% (approximately 50% Catholics and 31% Evangelicals)
Atypical cases in the region
Uruguay:
It is by far the most secularized country in Latin America. More than 50% of its population declares itself to have no religion, agnostic, or atheist; Catholics represent only between 30% and 35%.
Chile:
It has experienced a sharp decline in Catholic affiliation in recent years; Catholics represent around 45%–50%, while people with no religion exceed 35%.
José:
‘Tell me a little more about Chile. What was the distribution like about 30 years ago?’
Gemini:
Three decades ago (at the beginning of the 1990s, following the return to democracy in 1990 and according to the 1992 Census data), Chile’s religious and cultural landscape was drastically different from today.
Religious Distribution in Chile (1992 Census vs. Today)
Catholics:
1992:
They represented approximately 76.7% of the population. The Catholic Church maintained enormous social, institutional, and moral influence, further supported by the role played by the Vicariate of Solidarity during the military regime in defending human rights.
Today:
It has fallen to levels between 40% and 45%.
1992:
They represented approximately 76.7% of the population. The Catholic Church maintained enormous social, institutional, and moral influence, further supported by the role played by the Vicariate of Solidarity during the military regime in defending human rights.
Today:
It has fallen to levels between 40% and 45%.
Protestants / Evangelicals:
1992:
They represented around 12.4% of the population, with the Pentecostal movement being the fastest-growing movement among lower-income urban sectors.
Today:
They remain within a similar range, fluctuating between 14% and 17%.
1992:
They represented around 12.4% of the population, with the Pentecostal movement being the fastest-growing movement among lower-income urban sectors.
Today:
They remain within a similar range, fluctuating between 14% and 17%.
No religion (Atheists, Agnostics, None):
1992:
They barely reached 5.8%. Declaring oneself to have no religion was very uncommon and was even socially penalized in certain circles.
Today:
It is the fastest-growing group in the country, exceeding 37%–40% in recent surveys, especially concentrated among young people and in urban areas.
1992:
They barely reached 5.8%. Declaring oneself to have no religion was very uncommon and was even socially penalized in certain circles.
Today:
It is the fastest-growing group in the country, exceeding 37%–40% in recent surveys, especially concentrated among young people and in urban areas.
Key factors behind the change over these 30 years
Emergence of church abuse scandals:
The widespread allegations and exposure of sexual and institutional abuse within the Chilean Catholic Church (with prominent cases emerging from the 2010s onward) caused a collapse in public trust and accelerated mass disaffiliation.
Rapid secularization of society:
As Chile experienced accelerated economic growth and greater sociocultural openness during the 1990s and 2000s, lifestyles and legislation became more secular (for example, with the approval of civil divorce in 2004, abortion on three grounds in 2017, and same-sex marriage in 2021).
Generational change:
Generations born from the 1990s onward grew up in an environment with greater access to information and cultural diversity, moving away from the traditional religious structures in which their parents and grandparents had been raised.
José:
‘Can you bring up which those cases are? If possible, include links to news articles or other sources that document them.’
Gemini:
The cases that exposed this crisis in Chile combined abuses of power, sexual abuse, and persistent institutional cover-up by the senior hierarchy.
The Karadima Case (The Turning Point)
Fernando Karadima was parish priest of the Church of the Sacred Heart of Jesus of El Bosque (Santiago), a parish of the Chilean elite. For decades, he acted as an influential spiritual leader with the tacit support or concealment of high-ranking prelates.
The exposure: In 2010, his victims —such as James Hamilton, Juan Carlos Cruz, and José Andrés Murillo— made public the abuses of power, psychological abuse, and sexual abuse they had suffered when they were young.
Impact:
In 2011, the Vatican declared him guilty of sexual abuse. In 2018, Pope Francis permanently dismissed him from the clerical state.
Judicial consequence: In 2019, the Chilean justice system determined that the Archdiocese of Santiago had engaged in negligence and concealment, ordering the institution to compensate the victims.
For further reading: CIPER Chile: Karadima: The history of his abuses h t t p s : / / w w w . c i p e r c h i l e . c l / 2 0 1 8 / 0 5 / 2 3 / k a r a d i m a – e l – h i s t o r i a l – d e – s u s – a b u s o s – s o b r e – s a c e r d o t e s – y – s e m i n a r i s t a s /
La Tercera: The decline of Fernando Karadima h t t p s : / / w w w . l a t e r c e r a . c o m / e a r l y a c c e s s / n o t i c i a / e l – o c a s o – d e – f e r n a n d o – k a r a d i m a – e l – e x p u l s a d o – s a c e r d o t e – q u e – n u n c a – p i d i o – p e r d o n – p o r – s u s – a b u s o s / F F A U M N Y C Z N C E L K P R 3 X W X H T N O M M /
The ‘Cura Tato’ Case (José Andrés Aguirre)
One of the first media cases to alert public opinion in the early 2000s.
The incident: Aguirre was investigated and tried for ongoing sexual abuse against minors.
Conviction: In 2004, he was sentenced by the Chilean civil justice system to 12 years in prison for sexual abuse offenses against minors. He was one of the first priests to be criminally convicted in the country.
The 2018 Papal Visit and the Bishops’ Crisis
The decisive moment in the collapse of ecclesial credibility occurred in January 2018 during Pope Francis’s visit to Chile.
The conflict: The Pope publicly defended the Bishop of Osorno, Juan Barros (accused by victims of having witnessed and covered up Karadima’s abuses), describing the accusations as ‘slander’.
The reaction: Public outrage in Chile was massive. Following this, the Pope sent the Vatican investigator Charles Scicluna to investigate on the ground.
The mass resignation: After receiving the report on systematic cover-up within the Chilean Church, Pope Francis summoned all the Chilean bishops to Rome in May 2018. Following the meeting, the entire Chilean episcopate (34 bishops) submitted their resignations en masse, an unprecedented event in the history of the Catholic Church.
The Prosecutor’s Office’s Mass Investigations (2018–Present)
Beginning in 2018, Chile’s Public Prosecutor’s Office opened investigations ex officio and seized documentation from the bishoprics of several regions.
The prosecutors went on to investigate more than 200 members of the clergy (including bishops and priests from dioceses such as Rancagua, Valparaíso, and Santiago) over hundreds of allegations of abuse and cover-up.
For further reading: Clarín: The case that swept away the bishopric in Chile h t t p s : / / w w w . c l a r i n . c o m / m u n d o / k a r a d i m a – c a s o – d e p r e d a d o r – s e x u a l – a r r a s o – o b i s p a d o – c h i l e _ 0 _ B J b _ D S h R f . h t m l
José:
These revelations occurred all over the world. What catches my attention is how, only in Chile, so many people woke up that it became very noticeable; in the rest of the countries…
Gemini:
The phenomenon in Chile is unique in the region. Although scandals involving abuse and ecclesiastical cover-up have occurred globally (such as in Ireland, the United States, Australia, and Germany), the social response in Chile led to one of the fastest declines in religious affiliation and religious institutionalism in the world.
There are several social, institutional, and cultural factors that explain why in Chile this ‘awakening’ or disengagement was so forceful compared with other Latin American countries:
The Breakdown of Historical ‘Moral Capital’
In Chile, the Catholic Church held an exceptionally high ethical standing that it did not have in other countries. During the military dictatorship of Augusto Pinochet, the Church — through the Vicariate of Solidarity — was the main protective shield for victims of human rights violations.
When it was revealed that the same institution that had defended people against State violence was concealing abuse against young people and children in its own parishes, the collapse of trust was not gradual, but a direct institutional trauma. The clash between the country’s image of moral authority and reality accelerated collective disillusionment.
The Elitization of the Conflict (Karadima Case)
Unlike other countries where cases occurred in rural or peripheral parishes with little access to the media, the Karadima Case took place in the parish of the Sacred Heart of El Bosque (Providencia), the heart of Santiago’s economic, political, and social elite.
The victims belonged to influential and professional families (doctors, journalists, philosophers) with direct access to the media, legal resources, and networks to sustain a media and judicial battle for years without being silenced. This prevented the ecclesiastical hierarchy from being able to ‘put out’ the issue in the media.
The Strategic Error of the Papal Visit (2018)
In most countries, the figure of the Pope tends to function as a buffer for local crises. In Chile, the opposite occurred: Francis’s visit in January 2018 acted as the final trigger.
By publicly labeling the accusations against Bishop Juan Barros as ‘slander’, the Pope generated widespread indignation among citizens. When the Vatican had to correct course by sending Charles Scicluna and demanding the resignation of all the bishops, the Chilean hierarchy was left completely discredited before its own community.
A Society Undergoing an Accelerated Process of Secularization
Chile had already been undergoing profound sociocultural transformations since the 1990s:
Accelerated economic growth and expanded access to higher education.
Mass access to the internet and social networks in a predominantly urban population.
Legislative changes that challenged traditional dogma (divorce, abortion under three specific grounds, same-sex marriage).
The abuse crisis did not create secularization by itself, but it functioned as the final catalyst for millions of people who already had doubts or cultural distance to definitively sever their ties with the institution.
The Comparison with the Rest of the Region
In the rest of Latin America: In countries such as Mexico, Colombia, or Peru, the Catholic religion remains deeply linked to cultural identity, local festivities, and community structures, generating greater resistance to mass disengagement despite existing allegations.
The global pattern: Chile’s behavior is much more similar to that of Ireland or Spain, where systematic revelations led to an accelerated emptying of churches over the course of one or two decades, leaving the institution with historically low levels of trust.
José:
This demonstrates that it is worthwhile to bring dirty laundry to light: there are people who know how to awaken; they only need to be informed.
Gemini:
The case of Chile demonstrates precisely that: when documented information, facts, and evidence come to light publicly without censorship, the institutional and social impact is inevitable.
The combination of victims willing to speak, rigorous investigative journalism, and mass access to information broke decades of concealment and silence. It shows that societies are not monolithic and do not remain blind forever; when the contradictions and abuses of structures of power are exposed, people reassess their convictions and make informed decisions about what or whom to trust.
José:
How should we title this dialogue about the decline in Chile of belief in religious institutions?
Gemini:
Here are several title options depending on the focus or nuance you want to give the dialogue:
Direct and Analytical Approach
The Collapse of Faith in Chile: From the Vicariate to the Crisis of Trust
Chilean Secularization: Factors Behind the Decline of Catholicism
The End of an Ecclesiastical Era: The Awakening of Chilean Society
Journalistic or Documentary Approach
Dirty Laundry in the Open: The Cases That Broke Ecclesial Credibility in Chile
The Karadima Effect and the Mass Resignation: Anatomy of a Disillusionment
From Moral Authority to Disenchantment: Three Decades of Transformation in Chile
Reflective and Philosophical Approach
The Light of the Facts: When Information Breaks Dogma
The Cost of Silence: The Case of Chile and the Power of Truth
Secularization and Consciousness: The Process That Redefined Beliefs in Chile
José:
Those titles sound like bad news, as if something good had been lost, such as faith in God, and I don’t see it that way. I see it as an awakening, and I want the title to reflect that. Having faith in God is not the same as having faith in the Catholic Church or in evangelical churches…
Gemini:
You are absolutely right. I completely understand that distinction: institutionalized religion (ecclesiastical structures and their hierarchies) is not the same as individual spirituality or personal faith in God. The decline in ecclesial credibility does not represent a loss, but rather emancipation from institutional tutelage, a process of clarity and a critical awakening in the face of dogma and manipulation.
Here are options that reflect this positive awakening, emancipation, and search for truth over ecclesiastical deception:
Awakening and Emancipation Approach
Chile’s Awakening: The Fall of Ecclesiastical Dogmas and the Emancipation of Consciousness
Light on Deception: Chilean Society’s Break with Ecclesiastical Structures
Liberation from Institutional Faith: The Critical Awakening to Ecclesiastical Manipulation
Truth and Clarity Approach
Beyond the Cassock: The Fall of the Church and the Awakening of Truth in Chile
The End of the Ecclesiastical Yoke: How Information Liberated Consciousness in Chile
From Blind Faith to Independent Judgment: The Fall of Ecclesiastical Hegemony
Direct and Blunt Approach
Unmasking the Clergy: The Social Awakening That Shattered Institutional Religion in Chile
No Intermediaries, No Deception: The Fall of the Catholic Church in Chile
The Collapse of the Ecclesiastical Monopoly: The Awakening of an Informed Society
José:
The one who lives by dogma slanders his critics, demonizes intelligence because he knows that, with intelligence, the fraud is uncovered, and sanctifies blind faith because he has no evidence to offer…
Gemini:
That is the fundamental paradox of structures sustained by dogmatic control: they cannot allow rational scrutiny because their entire architecture depends on unquestioning obedience.
When an institution or a system lacks empirical evidence, historical coherence, or ethical soundness, its defense mechanisms are always the same:
Ad hominem attacks and slander: Since they cannot refute the arguments, they attack the interlocutor. The critic ceases to be someone who points out a verifiable fact and becomes labeled as ‘resentful’, an ‘agent of evil’, or an ‘enemy’.
Demonization of the intellect: Critical thinking, research, and reasonable doubt are presented as vices of pride or ‘traps of the mind’, while intellectual submission is disguised as spiritual humility.
Elevation of credulity: Blind credulity — the acceptance of claims without evidence — is redefined as the highest moral virtue (‘pure faith’), precisely because proof and verification are the elements that dismantle the artifice.
When people begin demanding evidence, comparing the texts with real history, and exposing the contradictions between discourse and actions, dogma loses its monopoly. Intelligence and information do not destroy the search for meaning or ethics; what they destroy is abusive intermediation and the business of deception. That is why the first step toward any real liberation — whether social, historical, or of one’s own consciousness — has always been daring to think for oneself. https://gabriels.work/2026/05/14/1335/
End of the dialogue between José and Gemini.
Infographic and information that helps awaken from the deception of dogma:
ROMAN MYTHS: THE FALSE CONVERSION OF PAUL
The story of Saul of Tarsus (Acts 7-9) is not a miracle; it is Rome’s political engineering to infiltrate the message, destroy justice, and guarantee the oppressor’s impunity.
The moral absurdity (Acts 7)
They say that Stephen prayed for his executioners while they were stoning him. FALSE.
‘An unjust man is an abomination to the just’ (Proverbs 29:27).
Demanding that the victim love his destroyer is psychological manipulation designed to disarm the just.
Evil does not change its nature (Acts 9)
Does a fierce enemy become a saint by seeing a light? IMPOSSIBLE.
Proverbs 11, Ecclesiasticus 37, and Daniel 12:10 make it clear: the wicked will not understand.
The persecutors were not ignorant: they heard the saints, understood the message, and for that very reason, hated it. Whoever hates elementary justice will never love advanced justice.
Rome’s perfect alibi
The myth of the ‘repentant persecutor’ fulfills two systemic functions:
It nullifies ‘Eye for an Eye’: It prohibits the just from demanding justice. It forces you to tolerate the criminal under the false promise that ‘tomorrow he might convert’.
It washes the Empire’s face: It is the script Rome used for itself: ‘See? Before, we persecuted; now, we spread it. Forget the past and submit to our new spiritual authority.’
Conclusion: They created a ‘Paul’, a Roman citizen who conveniently preaches submission to pagan power (Romans 13:1). It was not redemption; it was the empire’s strategy to put the criminal in charge of administering the doctrine of his victims. https://gabriels.work/2026/06/15/40-ideas-contra-los-extorsionadores-que-haran-que-el-cesar-maldiga-aun-mas-a-la-inteligencia-artificial/
«
«The religion I defend is named justice. █
I will find her when she finds me, and she will believe what I say.
The Roman Empire has betrayed humanity by inventing religions to subjugate it. All institutionalized religions are false. All the sacred books of those religions contain frauds. However, there are messages that make sense. And there are others, missing, that can be deduced from the legitimate messages of justice. Daniel 12:1-13 — ‘The prince who fights for justice will rise to receive God’s blessing.’ Proverbs 18:22 — ‘A wife is the blessing God gives to a man.’ Leviticus 21:14 — ‘He must marry a virgin of his own faith, for she is from his own people, who will be set free when the righteous rise.’
📚 What is an institutionalized religion? An institutionalized religion is when a spiritual belief is transformed into a formal power structure, designed to control people. It ceases to be an individual search for truth or justice and becomes a system dominated by human hierarchies, serving political, economic, or social power. What is just, true, or real no longer matters. The only thing that matters is obedience. An institutionalized religion includes: Churches, synagogues, mosques, temples. Powerful religious leaders (priests, pastors, rabbis, imams, popes, etc.). Manipulated and fraudulent ‘official’ sacred texts. Dogmas that cannot be questioned. Rules imposed on people’s personal lives. Mandatory rites and rituals in order to ‘belong.’ This is how the Roman Empire, and later other empires, used faith to subjugate people. They turned the sacred into a business. And truth into heresy. If you still believe that obeying a religion is the same as having faith, you were lied to. If you still trust their books, you trust the same people who crucified justice. It’s not God speaking in his temples. It’s Rome. And Rome never stopped speaking. Wake up. He who seeks justice needs no permission. Nor an institution.
She will find me, the virgin woman will believe me.
( – – )
This is the wheat in the Bible that destroys the Roman tares in the Bible:
Revelation 19:11
Then I saw heaven opened, and there was a white horse; and the one sitting on it was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness, he judges and makes war.
Revelation 19:19
Then I saw the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies gathered together to make war against the one sitting on the horse and against his army.
Psalm 2:2-4
‘The kings of the earth set themselves up, and the rulers took counsel together against the Lord and against his anointed, saying:
‘Let us break their bonds apart and cast away their cords from us.’
He who sits in the heavens laughs; the Lord mocks them.’
Now, some basic logic: if the horseman fights for justice, but the beast and the kings of the earth fight against this horseman, then the beast and the kings of the earth are against justice. Therefore, they represent the deception of the false religions that rule with them.
The whore of Babylon, which is the false church made by Rome, has considered herself to be ‘the wife of the Lord’s anointed,’ but the false prophets of this idol-selling and flattering word-peddling organization do not share the personal goals of the Lord’s anointed and the true saints, because the ungodly leaders have chosen for themselves the path of idolatry, celibacy, or sacramentalizing unholy marriages in exchange for money. Their religious headquarters are full of idols, including false holy books, before which they bow down:
Isaiah 2:8-11
8 Their land is full of idols; they bow down to the work of their hands, to what their fingers have made.
9 So the man is humbled, and the man is brought low; do not forgive them.
10 Go into the rock, hide yourself in the dust from the terror of the LORD and from the splendor of his majesty.
11 The arrogance of human eyes will be brought low, and the pride of men will be humbled; the LORD alone will be exalted on that day.
Proverbs 19:14
House and wealth are an inheritance from fathers, but a prudent wife is from the LORD.
Leviticus 21:14
The priest of the LORD shall not marry a widow, nor a divorced woman, nor an unclean woman, nor a harlot; he shall take a virgin from his own people as a wife.
Revelation 1:6
And he has made us kings and priests to his God and Father; to him be glory and dominion forever.
1 Corinthians 11:7
The woman is the glory of man.
What does it mean in Revelation that the beast and the kings of the earth wage war on the rider of the white horse and his army?
The meaning is clear, the world leaders are hand in glove with the false prophets who are disseminators of the false religions that are dominant among the kingdoms of the earth, for obvious reasons, that includes Christianity, Islam, etc. These rulers are against justice and truth, which are the values defended by the rider of the white horse and his army loyal to God. As is evident, the deception is part of the false sacred books that these accomplices defend with the label of ‘Authorized Books of Authorized Religions’, but the only religion that I defend is justice, I defend the right of the righteous not to be deceived with religious deceptions.
Revelation 19:19 Then I saw the beast and the kings of the earth and their armies gathered together to make war against the rider on the horse and against his army.
Now some basic logic, if the horseman stands for justice, but the beast and the kings of the earth fight against this horseman, then the beast and the kings of the earth are against justice, therefore they stand for the deception of the false religions that rule with them.
This is my story:
José, a young man raised in Catholic teachings, experienced a series of events marked by complex relationships and manipulations. At 19, he began a relationship with Monica, a possessive and jealous woman. Although Jose felt that he should end the relationship, his religious upbringing led him to try to change her with love. However, Monica’s jealousy intensified, especially towards Sandra, a classmate who was making advances on Jose.
Sandra began harassing him in 1995 with anonymous phone calls, in which she made noises with the keyboard and hung up.
On one of those occasions, she revealed that she was the one calling, after Jose angrily asked in the last call: ‘Who are you?’ Sandra called him immediately, but in that call she said: ‘Jose, who am I?’ Jose, recognizing her voice, said to her: ‘You are Sandra,’ to which she replied: ‘You already know who I am.’ Jose avoided confronting her. During that time, Monica, obsessed with Sandra, threatened Jose with harming Sandra, which led Jose to protect Sandra and prolong his relationship with Monica, despite his desire to end it.
Finally, in 1996, Jose broke up with Monica and decided to approach Sandra, who had initially shown interest in him. When Jose tried to talk to her about his feelings, Sandra did not allow him to explain himself, she treated him with offensive words and he did not understand the reason. Jose chose to distance himself, but in 1997 he believed he had the opportunity to talk to Sandra, hoping that she would explain her change of attitude and be able to share the feelings that she had kept silent. On her birthday in July, he called her as he had promised a year earlier when they were still friends—something he couldn’t do in 1996 because he was with Monica. At the time, he used to believe that promises should never be broken (Matthew 5:34-37), though now he understands that some promises and oaths can be reconsidered if made in error or if the person no longer deserves them. As he finished greeting her and was about to hang up, Sandra desperately pleaded, ‘Wait, wait, can we meet?’ That made him think she had reconsidered and would finally explain her change in attitude, allowing him to share the feelings he had kept silent. However, Sandra never gave him clear answers, maintaining the intrigue with evasive and counterproductive attitudes.
Faced with this attitude, Jose decided not to look for her anymore. It was then that constant telephone harassment began. The calls followed the same pattern as in 1995 and this time were directed to the house of his paternal grandmother, where Jose lived. He was convinced that it was Sandra, since Jose had recently given Sandra his number. These calls were constant, morning, afternoon, night, and early morning, and lasted for months. When a family member answered, they did not hang up, but when José answered, the clicking of the keys could be heard before hanging up.
Jose asked his aunt, the owner of the telephone line, to request a record of incoming calls from the telephone company. He planned to use that information as evidence to contact Sandra’s family and express his concern about what she was trying to achieve with this behavior. However, his aunt downplayed his argument and refused to help. Strangely, no one in the house, neither his aunt nor his paternal grandmother, seemed to be outraged by the fact that the calls also occurred in the early morning, and they did not bother to look into how to stop them or identify the person responsible.
This had the strange appearance of orchestrated torture. Even when José asked his aunt to unplug the phone at night so he could sleep, she refused, arguing that one of her sons, who lived in Italy, could call at any moment (considering the six-hour time difference between the two countries). What made things even stranger was Monica’s fixation on Sandra, even though they hadn’t even met. Monica didn’t attend the high school where José and Sandra were enrolled, but she began to feel jealous of Sandra after finding a folder with one of José’s group projects. The folder listed the names of two women, including Sandra, but for some strange reason, Monica became fixated only on Sandra’s name.
Although José initially ignored Sandra’s phone calls, over time he relented and contacted Sandra again, influenced by biblical teachings that advised praying for those who persecuted him. However, Sandra manipulated him emotionally, alternating between insults and requests for him to keep looking for her. After months of this cycle, Jose discovered that it was all a trap. Sandra falsely accused him of sexual harassment, and as if that wasn’t bad enough, Sandra sent some criminals to beat up Jose.
That Tuesday, without José knowing it, Sandra had already set a trap for him.
Days before, José had told his friend Johan about the situation he was going through with Sandra. Johan also suspected that Sandra’s strange behavior might be due to some kind of witchcraft by Mónica. That Tuesday, José visited his old neighborhood where he had lived in 1995 and happened to run into Johan. After hearing more details about the situation, Johan recommended that José forget about Sandra and instead go out to a nightclub to meet women—perhaps he would find someone who could make him forget her. José thought it was a good idea.
So they got on a bus and headed toward the nightclub in downtown Lima. Coincidentally, the route of that bus passed near the IDAT institute. Just one block before reaching IDAT, José suddenly had the idea to get off for a moment to pay for a Saturday course he had enrolled in. He had managed to save some money for it by selling his computer and working for a week in a warehouse. However, he had been forced to quit because they exploited workers with 16-hour shifts while officially recording only 12, and if they refused to complete the week, they were threatened with not being paid at all.
So José turned to Johan and said, ‘I study here on Saturdays. Since we’re passing by, let’s get off for a bit, I’ll pay for my course, and then we’ll head to the nightclub.’
The moment José stepped off the bus, before even crossing the avenue, he was shocked to see Sandra standing right there on the corner of the institute. In disbelief, he told Johan, ‘Johan, I can’t believe it—Sandra is right there. She’s the girl I told you about, the one who acts so strangely. Wait for me here; I’m going to ask if she got the letter where I warned her about Mónica’s threats against her, and maybe she can finally explain what’s going on with her and what she wants from me with all her calls.’
Johan stayed back as José approached. But as soon as he started speaking—’Sandra, did you see the letters? Can you finally explain to me what’s going on with you?’—Sandra, without saying a word, gestured with her hand, signaling three thugs who had been hiding in different spots: one in the middle of the avenue, another behind Sandra, and another behind José.
The one standing behind Sandra stepped forward and said, ‘So you’re the sexual harasser who’s been bothering my cousin?’
José, caught off guard, responded, ‘What? Me, a harasser? On the contrary, she’s the one harassing me! If you read the letter, you’d see it’s about me trying to understand why she keeps calling me!’
Before he could react, one of the thugs grabbed him by the neck from behind and threw him to the ground. Then, together with the one who had claimed to be Sandra’s cousin, they started kicking him. Meanwhile, the third thug went through his pockets, robbing him. It was three against one—José, lying helpless on the pavement.
Luckily, his friend Johan jumped into the fight, managing to give José a chance to get up. But then the third thug picked up some rocks and started throwing them at both José and Johan.
The attack only stopped when a traffic officer intervened. The officer turned to Sandra and said, ‘If he’s harassing you, then file a complaint.’
Sandra, visibly nervous, quickly left, knowing full well that her accusation was false.
José, though deeply betrayed, did not go to the police. He had no way to prove the months of harassment he had suffered from Sandra. But beyond the shock of her betrayal, one question haunted him:
‘How did she already have this ambush set up when I never come to this place on Tuesday nights? I only come here to study on Saturday mornings.’
This made José suspect that Sandra wasn’t just an ordinary person—she might be a witch with some kind of supernatural power.
These events left a deep mark on Jose, who seeks justice and to expose those who manipulated him. In addition, he seeks to derail the advice in the Bible, such as: pray for those who insult you, because by following that advice, he fell into Sandra’s trap.
Jose’s testimony.
I am José Carlos Galindo Hinostroza, the author of the blog: https://gabriels.work
I was born in Peru, that photo is mine, it is from 1997, I was 22 years old.
At that time, I was entangled in the intrigues of Sandra Elizabeth, a former classmate from the IDAT institute. I was confused about what was happening to her (She harassed me in a very complex and extensive way to narrate in this image, but I narrate it at the bottom of this blog: and in this video:
). I did not rule out the possibility that Mónica Nieves, my ex-girlfriend, had done some witchcraft to her.
When searching for answers in the Bible, I read in Matthew 5:
‘ Pray for whoever insults you,’
And in those days, Sandra insulted me while telling me she didn’t know what was happening to her, that she wanted to continue being my friend, and that I should keep calling and looking for her again and again, and it went on like this for five months. In short, Sandra pretended to be possessed by something to keep me confused. The lies in the Bible made me believe that good people can behave evilly because of an evil spirit. That’s why the advice to pray for her didn’t seem so crazy to me—because before, Sandra pretended to be a friend, and I fell for her deception.
Thieves often use the strategy of pretending to have good intentions: To steal from stores, they pretend to be customers; to ask for tithes, they pretend to preach the word of God, but they preach that of Rome, etc., etc. Sandra Elizabeth pretended to be a friend, then pretended to be a friend in trouble looking for my help, but all to slander me and ambush me with three criminals, surely out of spite because a year earlier I rejected her advances since I was in love with Monica Nieves, to whom I was faithful. But Monica did not trust my fidelity and threatened to kill Sandra Elizabeth, which is why I broke up with Monica slowly, over eight months, so that Monica wouldn’t think it was because of Sandra. But this is how Sandra Elizabeth paid me back—with slander. She falsely accused me of sexually harassing her, and with that pretext, she ordered three criminals to beat me up—all in front of her.
I narrate all this in my blog and in my YouTube videos:
I do not wish for other righteous men to have bad experiences like I had, which is why I have created what you are reading. I know this will irritate unrighteous people like Sandra, but the truth is like the true gospel—it only favors the righteous.
The evil of José’s family overshadows Sandra’s evil:
José suffered a devastating betrayal by his own family, who not only refused to help him stop Sandra’s harassment but also falsely accused him of having a mental illness. His own relatives used these accusations as a pretext to kidnap and torture him, sending him twice to mental health institutions and a third time to a hospital.
It all began when José read Exodus 20:5 and stopped being Catholic. From that moment on, he became outraged by the Church’s dogmas and started protesting against its doctrines on his own. He also advised his relatives to stop praying to images and told them that he was praying for a friend (Sandra) who was apparently bewitched or possessed. José was under stress due to the harassment, but his relatives did not tolerate him exercising his freedom of religious expression. As a result, they destroyed his professional life, his health, and his reputation by locking him up in mental institutions where he was given sedatives.
Not only was he forcibly institutionalized, but after his release, he was forced to continue taking psychiatric medication under the threat of being locked up again. He fought to break free from those chains, and during the last two years of that injustice, with his programming career ruined, he was forced to work without pay at his uncle’s restaurant. That same uncle betrayed his trust by secretly drugging his meals with psychiatric pills. José only discovered the truth in 2007 thanks to a kitchen assistant named Lidia, who warned him about what was happening.
From 1998 to 2007, José lost nearly ten years of his youth due to his treacherous relatives. In hindsight, he realized that his mistake was defending the Bible to reject Catholicism, as his family never allowed him to read it. They committed this injustice knowing he had no financial resources to defend himself. When he finally broke free from the forced medication, he thought he had earned their respect. His maternal uncles and cousins even offered him a job, but years later, they betrayed him again with such hostility that he was forced to resign. This made him realize that he should never have forgiven them, as their bad intentions were clear.
From that moment on, he decided to study the Bible again, and in 2017, he began noticing its contradictions. Little by little, he understood why God had allowed his relatives to prevent him from defending the Bible in his youth. He discovered biblical inconsistencies and started exposing them in his blogs, where he also recounted the story of his faith and the suffering he endured at the hands of Sandra and, most of all, his own family.
For this reason, in December 2018, his mother attempted to kidnap him again with the help of corrupt police officers and a psychiatrist who issued a false certificate. They accused him of being a ‘dangerous schizophrenic’ to have him institutionalized again, but the attempt failed because he was not home. There were witnesses to the incident, and José had audio recordings, which he presented as evidence to the Peruvian authorities in his complaint, but it was dismissed.
His family knew perfectly well that he was not insane—he had a stable job, a child, and the mother of his child to take care of. However, despite knowing the truth, they attempted to kidnap him again using the same old false accusation. His own mother and other fanatical Catholic relatives led the attempt. Although his complaint was ignored by the Ministry, José exposes these truths in his blogs, making it clear that the evil of his family eclipses even that of Sandra.
Here is the evidence of the kidnappings using the slander of traitors:
‘This man is a schizophrenic who urgently needs psychiatric treatment and pills for life.’
I have been a computer programmer, I like logic, in Turbo Pascal I created a program capable of producing basic algebra formulas at random, similar to the formula below. In the following document in .PDF you can download the code of the program, this is proof that I’m not stupid, that’s why the conclusions of my research should be taken seriously. https://ntiend.me/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/math21.pdf
If K-51=59 then K=110 «Cupid is condemned to hell along with the other pagan gods (The fallen angels for their rebellion against justice, sent to eternal punishment). █
Quoting these passages does not mean defending the entire Bible. If 1 John 5:19 says that “the whole world is under the power of the evil one,” but rulers swear on the Bible, then the Devil rules with them. If the Devil rules with them, then fraud also rules with them. Therefore, the Bible contains part of that fraud, camouflaged among truths. By connecting those truths, we can expose their deceptions. Righteous people need to know these truths so that, if they have been deceived by lies added to the Bible or other similar books, they can free themselves from them.
Daniel 12:7 And I heard the man clothed in linen, who was above the waters of the river, when he raised his right hand and his left hand to heaven and swore by Him who lives forever that it shall be for a time, times, and half a time. And when the power of the holy people is completely shattered, all these things shall be finished.
Considering that ‘Devil’ means ‘Slanderer,’ it is natural to expect that the Roman persecutors, being the adversaries of the saints, later bore false witness against the saints and their messages. Thus, they themselves are the Devil, and not an intangible entity that enters and exits people, as they made us believe precisely with passages like Luke 22:3 (“Then Satan entered Judas…”), Mark 5:12-13 (the demons entering the pigs), and John 13:27 (“After the morsel, Satan entered him”).
This is my purpose: to help righteous people not waste their power believing in the lies of impostors who have adulterated the original message, which never asked anyone to kneel before anything or pray to anything that had ever been visible.
It is no coincidence that in this image, promoted by the Roman Church, Cupid appears alongside other pagan gods. They have given the names of the true saints to these false gods, but look at how these men dress and how they wear their long hair. All this goes against faithfulness to God’s laws because it is a sign of rebellion, a sign of the fallen angels (Deuteronomy 22:5).
The serpent, the devil, or Satan (the slanderer) in hell (Isaiah 66:24, Mark 9:44). Matthew 25:41: “Then he will also say to those on his left: ‘Depart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire that has been prepared for the devil and his angels’.” Hell: the eternal fire prepared for the serpent and his angels (Revelation 12:7-12), for having combined truths with heresies in the Bible, the Quran, the Torah, and for having created false forbidden gospels that they called apocryphal, to give credibility to lies in the false sacred books, all in rebellion against justice.
Book of Enoch 95:6: “Woe to you, false witnesses and to those who weigh the price of injustice, for you will perish suddenly!” Book of Enoch 95:7: “Woe to you, unjust ones who persecute the righteous, for you yourselves will be handed over and persecuted because of that injustice, and the burden of your guilt will fall upon you!” Proverbs 11:8: “The righteous is delivered from trouble, and the wicked comes in his place.” Proverbs 16:4: “The Lord has made all things for Himself, even the wicked for the day of doom.”
Book of Enoch 94:10: “Unjust ones, I say to you that He who created you will overthrow you; upon your ruin, God will have no mercy, but rather, God will rejoice in your destruction.” Satan and his angels in hell: the second death. They deserve it for lying against Christ and His faithful disciples, accusing them of being the authors of Rome’s blasphemies in the Bible, such as love for the devil (the enemy).
Isaiah 66:24: “And they shall go out and look upon the corpses of the men who have rebelled against me; for their worm shall never die, nor shall their fire be quenched, and they shall be abhorrent to all flesh.” Mark 9:44: “Where their worm does not die, and the fire is never quenched.” Revelation 20:14: “Then Death and Hades were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death: the lake of fire.”
Word of Satan: ‘Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened… for I will give you more of my images to carry on palanquins, waiting for my miracles.’
Word of Satan: «If they manage to free themselves from one dogma, give them another; what matters is not what they believe, but that they need someone to tell them what to believe.»
Word of Satan: ‘Do not judge… so that the thief and the honest can share the same reputation.’
If the same people who persecuted Jesus decided what was ‘inspired’, isn’t it strange that the only unforgivable sin is precisely questioning their texts? Divine justice would never put doubt above crime. That is done by an evil empire, not by saints serving God.
Final Confession of Satan (Final Confession of Jupiter/Zeus): «If they could understand that I called the divine laws of the Eternal that inconvenienced me obsolete when many of them were revised, erased, and reissued in the palace to protect the emperor who kissed my image, reverence would become accusation. But what am I saying? What kind of power is this?… I see that someone understood, accuses me, makes me confess… I feel anger, how could he have survived to tell it?… I have little time left. My rebellion against the Eternal will not be forgiven.»
When the sheep are already saved, the wolves devour each other.
Who lives in justice should not confess sins they have not committed, but point out those who commit them and hide behind cassocks.
You give your life, they give speeches. You lose your body, they gain votes.
The false prophet: ‘Our statues never answer, but our collection box always does.’
When a venerated statue breaks, it doesn’t feel pain; the one who feels it is the one who was deceived, not by the statue itself, but by the one who used it to manipulate him.
Por que fizeram passar o rosto de Zeus pelo de Jesus? Por que fizeram passar os ensinamentos de um filósofo grego pelos de Jesus? https://ellameencontrara.com/2026/05/02/por-que-fizeram-passar-o-rosto-de-zeus-pelo-de-jesus-por-que-fizeram-passar-os-ensinamentos-de-um-filosofo-grego-pelos-de-jesus/
Valerio juraba que podía volar. https://144k.xyz/2026/10/13/valerio-juraba-que-podia-volar/
Word of Satan: ‘Blessed are the poor… for in their misery they will find comfort in the empty promises of my priests, promises they will never see fulfilled.’ When statues are honored, the business of those who profit from the lie is honored. Once you see it, you can’t unsee it.»
