The saints did NOT forgive those who murdered them: The Empire lied to us. (Video language:Italian) /663/ https://youtu.be/uZYELNZtuDE,
Day 240
God’s Selective Love: The Parable of the Net Cast into the Sea. (Video language:English) /610/ https://youtu.be/q5XJk5Ec3yo
«The just punishment for owners of dangerous animals that cause the death of innocent people should be legal in Peru.
I constantly see news reports in which the owners of dangerous dogs —dogs that cause the death of other people who had the misfortune of encountering them, not because they were trying to break into their owners’ homes, but because they were unfortunate enough that their owners did not put muzzles on them or lock them up— are not sentenced to death because the law does not establish it that way.
That is not justice. What is just is not necessarily legal, and what is legal is not always just. And justice, in this case, is the death penalty for such negligence. I do not agree with everything the Bible says, but this does seem just to me and should be emulated and legalized:
Exodus 21:28: ‘If an ox gore a man or a woman, and they die, the ox shall be stoned, and its flesh shall not be eaten; but the owner of the ox shall be acquitted. 29 But if the ox was known to have been a goring ox from time past, and its owner had been warned, and he did not keep it confined, and it killed a man or a woman, the ox shall be stoned, and its owner shall also die.
Psalms 119:17: ‘Deal bountifully with thy servant, that I may live,
And keep thy word.
18 Open thou mine eyes, that I may behold
Wondrous things out of thy law.
19 I am a stranger in the earth:
Hide not thy commandments from me.
20 My soul breaketh for the longing
That it hath unto thy judgments at all times.
21 Thou hast rebuked the proud that are cursed,
Which do err from thy commandments’.
Who strayed from the just commandments if not the Empire that never stopped worshiping images?
Who denied Jesus his life and then refused to receive the punishment of life for life, if not Rome, which lied by saying that, while on the cross, Jesus forgave his enemies? Who told us that story if not the Empire that used dogs to eat alive those who followed the religion of Jesus?
Do you see any blessing here from the victim toward his murderers? Do you see love for the enemy here? I see curses against the enemies; I only see justified hatred, not love:
Psalms 69:20 The reproach hath broken my heart; and I am full of heaviness.
And I looked for some to take pity, but there was none;
And for comforters, but I found none.
21 They gave me also gall for my meat;
And in my thirst they gave me vinegar to drink.
Matthew 27:34 And they gave him vinegar to drink mingled with gall: and when he had tasted thereof, he would not drink.
Psalms 69:22 Let their table become a snare before them,
And that which should have been for their welfare, let it become a trap.
23 Let their eyes be darkened, that they see not;
And make their loins continually to shake.
24 Pour out thine indignation upon them,
And let thy wrathful anger take hold of them.
25 Let their habitation be desolate;
And let none dwell in their tents.
Who lied to us with this claim that the murderers of Jesus were forgiven by Jesus?
Luke 23:34 And Jesus said, Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do. And they parted his raiment, and cast lots.
Would Jesus ask forgiveness for those whom he had just disparagingly called ‘dogs’?
Psalms 22:16 For dogs have compassed me:
The assembly of the wicked have inclosed me:
They pierced my hands and my feet.
17 I may tell all my bones:
They look and stare upon me.
18 They part my garments among them,
And cast lots upon my vesture.
Who lied to us about Jesus and his religion? Were they not the depraved Roman emperors?
Why does the Roman Empire tell us about saints forgiving those who killed them if the righteous hate the wicked according to other biblical scriptures that seem to have survived the censorship of the Roman Empire, which ultimately decided their content?
Acts 7:59-60 And they stoned Stephen, calling upon God, and saying: … Lord, lay not this sin to their charge. And when he had said this, he fell asleep.
Proverbs 29:27 The just hate the unjust, the unjust hate the just.
How can Acts 7 be a faithful testimony about Stephen’s death and his feelings toward his murderers if Revelation 6 tells us that the murdered saints desire that their deaths be avenged?
Revelation 6:9 And when he had opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of them that were slain for the word of God, and for the testimony which they held. 10 And they cried with a loud voice, saying, How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?
What would God say about these contradictory prayers?
‘So? Did you not ask me to forgive those murderers because ‘they know not what they do’, and did you not tell me not to take their sin into account for having murdered them? Where do we stand? Are you contradicting yourselves, or is this the false testimony given by their murderers?’
It is evident that there are conflicting messages in the Bible: the messages of the saints versus the messages of the usurpers; the usurpers sought impunity for their crimes against the saints:
Those who lead the dissemination of the Imperial legacy of the worship of images of the sun have no logical arguments; they cannot explain these things coherently, so they remain silent:
Isaiah 41:28 I looked, and there was no man; and I asked of these things, and no counsellor, that, when I asked of them, could answer a word. 29 Behold, they are all vanity, and their works are nothing: their molten images are wind and confusion.
Isaiah 47:10 You felt secure in your wickedness and said, ‘No one sees me.’ Your wisdom and your knowledge have deceived you, and you said in your heart, ‘I, and no one else.’ https://gabriels.work/2026/07/17/el-negocio-de-la-fe-como-la-iglesia-y-la-brujeria-usan-el-mismo-manual/
Tacitus recounts the persecution of followers of the message of Christ that Nero carried out after the great fire of Rome in the year 64 AD. According to his account, Nero blamed the followers of the message of Christ in order to divert suspicion that he himself had caused the fire. Tacitus then describes different methods of execution. Among them, he says that some followers of the message of Christ were covered with animal skins and torn apart by dogs; others were crucified and others burned.
Tacitus’s passage about thedogs is quite explicit:
‘Covered with the skins of wild beasts, they were torn apart by dogs and perished…’
h t t p s : / / e s . w i k i p e d i a . o r g / w i k i / N e r % C 3% B 3 n
Word of the Devil: ‘Do not demonize my puppies, they are not dangerous, they only appear to be.’
Let this not go without justpunishment:
Peru – 2023
Arequipa: Pitbull dog violently attacked a60-year-old elderly man until causing his death
Peru – December 2025
Baby dies from an attack by two pitbull dogs in SJL: PNP detains two people – h t t p s : / / w w w . i n f o b a e . c o m / p e r u / 2 0 2 5 / 1 2 / 0 9 /b e b e – m u e r e – p o r – a t a q u e – d e – d o s – p e r r o s – p i t bu l l – e n – s j l – p n p – d e t i e n e – a – d o s – p e r s o n a s /
Peru – August 2026
Two Rottweiler dogs kill a 66-year-old elderly woman while she was going to the market.
h t t p s : / / d i a r i o c o r r e o . p e / e d i c i o n / a r e q u i p a/ f a t a l – a t a q u e – e n – a r e q u i p a – p e r r o s – m a t a n – a-a n c i a n a – c u a n d o – i b a – a l – m e r c a d o – n o t i c i a /
Peru – December 2025
East Lima: Prosecutor’s Office investigates the death of an 11-month-old baby after beingattacked by a pitbull dog – h t t p s : / / w w w . g o b . p e / i n s t i t u c i o n / m p f n / n o t ic i a s / 1 3 0 8 7 1 4 – l i m a – e s t e – f i s c a l i a – i n v e s t i ga – f a l l e c i m i e n t o – d e – b e b e – d e – 1 1 – m e s e s – t r a s-ser- at a c a d o – p o r – u n – p e r r o – p i t b u l l
Peru – September 2024
La Libertad: Three pitbulls attack and kill a father who leaves eightchildren orphaned – h t t p s : / / n o t i c i a s t r u j i l l o . p e / l a – l i b e r t a d -t r e s – p i t b u l l s – a t a c a n – y – m a t a n – a – p a d r e – d e -f a m i l i a – q u e – d e j a – o c h o – h i j o s – h u e r f a n o s /
Peru – March 2024
Arequipa: pitbull dogs attack and kill a 6-year-old boy in his own home – h t t p s : / / e l c o m e r c i o . p e / v i d e o s / p a i s / a r e q u ip a – p e r r o s – p i t b u l l – a t a c a n – y – m a t a n – a – n i n o -d e – 6 – a n o s – e n – s u – p r o p i a – c a s a – n n a v – a m t v – v id e o – p a i s – n o t i c i a /
«
«In Mark 3:29, the ‘sin against the Holy Spirit’ is warned as unforgivable. However, history and the practices of Rome reveal a shocking moral inversion: the truly unforgivable sin, according to their dogma, is questioning the credibility of their Bible. Meanwhile, serious crimes such as the killing of innocents have been ignored or justified under the same authority that claimed to be infallible. This post examines how this ‘unique sin’ was constructed and how the institution used it to protect its power while justifying historical injustices.
In purposes contrary to Christ is the Antichrist, if you read Isaiah 11 you will see the mission of Christ in his second life, and it is not to favor everyone but only the righteous, but the Antichrist is inclusive, despite being unjust, he wants to climb onto Noah’s Ark, despite being unjust he wants to leave Sodom with Lot… Happy are those to whom these words are not offensive. He who is not offended by this message, that one is righteous, congratulations to him: Christianity was created by the Romans, only a mind friendly to celibacy, proper of Greek and Roman leaders, enemies of the ancient Jews, could conceive a message like the one that says: ‘These are the ones who did not defile themselves with women, for they remained virgins. They follow the Lamb wherever he goes. They were purchased from among mankind and offered as firstfruits to God and to the Lamb’ in Revelation 14:4, or a message like this one which is similar: ‘For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like the angels of God in heaven,’ in Matthew 22:30, both messages sound as if they came from a Roman Catholic priest, and not from a prophet of God who seeks this blessing for himself: He who finds a wife finds what is good and receives favor from the Lord (Proverbs 18:22), Leviticus 21:14 A widow, or a divorced woman, or a woman who has been defiled, or a prostitute, he shall not marry; but he shall take as a wife a virgin from his own people.
I am not Christian; I am henotheist. I believe in one supreme God above all, and I believe that several created gods exist—some faithful, others deceivers. I only pray to the supreme God. But since I was indoctrinated from childhood in Roman Christianity, I believed in its teachings for many years. I applied those ideas even when common sense told me otherwise. For example—so to speak—I turned the other cheek to a woman who had already struck me on one. A woman who, at first, acted like a friend, but then, without justification, began treating me as if I were her enemy, with strange and contradictory behavior. Influenced by the Bible, I believed she had become an enemy because of some spell, and that what she needed was prayer to return to being the friend she had once shown herself to be (or pretended to be). But in the end, everything only got worse. As soon as I had the chance to dig deeper, I uncovered the lie and felt betrayed in my faith. I came to understand that many of those teachings did not come from the true message of justice, but from Roman Hellenism infiltrated into the Scriptures. And I confirmed I had been deceived. That’s why I now denounce Rome and its fraud. I do not fight against God, but against the slanders that have corrupted His message. Proverbs 29:27 declares that the righteous hates the wicked. However, 1 Peter 3:18 claims that the righteous died for the wicked. Who can believe that someone would die for those he hates? To believe it is to have blind faith; it is to accept incoherence. And when blind faith is preached, could it be because the wolf wants his prey not to see the deception?
Jehovah will shout like a mighty warrior: ‘I will take vengeance on My enemies!’
(Revelation 15:3 + Isaiah 42:13 + Deuteronomy 32:41 + Nahum 1:2–7)
And what about the so-called ‘love for the enemy’ that, according to some Bible verses, the Son of Jehovah supposedly preached—claiming we should imitate His Father’s perfection through universal love? (Mark 12:25–37, Psalm 110:1–6, Matthew 5:38–48)
That is a lie spread by the enemies of both Father and Son.
A false doctrine born from mixing Hellenism with sacred words.»
«
These are the things I said in 1998 to the kidnapper with the title of psychiatrist, who, like a bought judge, unjustly ruled that I should be confined and drugged at the Pinel clinic in 1998, and then again in 2001: ‘What kind of psychiatrist are you, who locks up mentally healthy people? How much were you paid to falsely accuse me and have me kidnapped? Why do you ask me ‘how are you?’ Do you not see that I am in a straitjacket? What did you expect me to answer: ‘I am very well and quite comfortable’?’ When I was 22 years old and read Exodus 20:5 for the first time, I understood that I had been deceived by the Catholic Church. However, I had not yet read enough of the Bible to understand something crucial: that defending the Bible as a whole in order to protest against idolatry was also a mistake, because it implied defending other falsehoods with which Rome had surrounded that truth. One year later, religious fanatics in my family environment did not tolerate that I called idolatry the Catholic practices they carried out, against which I protested indignantly, since I had also been indoctrinated to practice them from childhood and felt betrayed; that intolerance turned into religious persecution against me, the result of which was the captivity I suffered in a mental institution for weeks as if I were insane. //104
Proverbs 29:27: ‘The righteous detest the wicked, and the wicked detest those who walk in uprightness.’ Proverbs 17:15: ‘He who justifies the wicked and he who condemns the righteous, both are an abomination to Jehovah.’ When Pope Francis says that no one deserves the death penalty because human dignity always prevails, and when he says that God loves everyone, Francis is saying: ‘This murderer has dignity, deserves life, and Jehovah loves him.’ [ROME — Pope Francis has declared that the death penalty is unacceptable… …in all cases ‘because it constitutes an attack on the inviolability and dignity of the person,’ the Vatican announced on August 2, thus reversing Roman Catholic teachings on this issue. August 2, 2018 – nytimes . com] 2 Thessalonians 2:8: ‘The lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord Jesus will kill with the breath of his mouth.’ Pope Francis declared that the death penalty is unacceptable in all cases, saying: ‘There is a growing awareness that the dignity of the person is not lost even after the commission of very serious crimes.’ Proverbs 28:4: ‘Those who forsake the law praise the wicked, but those who keep the law contend with them.’ Isaiah 11:4: ‘He will strike the wicked with the breath of his lips.’ If the religion of Jesus were linked to the law and the prophets, and Rome did not respect his message, it is logical to conclude that it did not respect either the law or the prophets. Therefore, the contradictions in the texts that Rome ended up calling the ‘Old Testament’ are not surprising. I will show you some examples: Genesis 4:15: murderer protected from the death penalty. Numbers 35:33: murderer condemned to death. Ezekiel 33:18-20: the righteous can become wicked, and the wicked can become righteous, versus Daniel 12:10: the righteous cannot become wicked, and the wicked cannot become righteous. Now, if the wicked could truly become righteous, the original message of Jesus would not have been persecuted by anyone, but accepted by all. //88
Between Dogma and the Manipulation of a Cruel Woman. //313
The Pope: successor of the Caesars or of Saint Peter? //50
The Roman Empire, Bahira, Muhammad, Jesus and persecuted Judaism. //930
The Judas Betrayal and the Long-Haired Jesus: Two Lies Exposed //323
«
1 Бог Римской империи, скрытый в надписях https://penademuerteya.com/2026/09/27/cidi09/ 2 Donde la gente cree que el amor al enemigo es una virtud, los enemigos proliferan. ¿Entre quiénes sí funciona «el amor por los enemigos» y entre quiénes no funciona jamás? ¿Crees que podemos frenar las extorsiones con el amor por los extorsionadores? https://144k.xyz/2026/09/13/donde-la-gente-cree-que-el-amor-al-enemigo-es-una-virtud-los-enemigos-proliferan-entre-quienes-si-funciona-el-amor-por-los-enemigos-y-entre-quienes-no-funciona-jamas-crees-q/ 3 Iskay Killankunawan Mikhusqa Planeta https://144k.xyz/2026/07/01/iskay-killankunawan-mikhusqa-planeta/ 4 Suriin natin ang infographic na nagsusuri at bumabatikos sa biswal at mapanirang mensahe laban sa mga banal. https://antibestia.com/2026/05/28/suriin-natin-ang-infographic-na-nagsusuri-at-bumabatikos-sa-biswal-at-mapanirang-mensahe-laban-sa-mga-banal/ 5 Estando na cruz, Jesus amaldiçoou seus inimigos e os chamou de cães? https://depuracion-del-mensaje.blogspot.com/2026/10/estando-na-cruz-jesus-amaldicoou-seus.html
«Are All Sinners Equal in the Eyes of God?
[Satan] ‘The devil, like a lion, seeks to confuse you. We do not worship images; we venerate them’.
[The man] ‘The devil charges them for the lie that they will be saved even if they do not stop worshipping creatures’.
If you do the same thing that is described and condemned, even if you use a different verb, you are still doing what is condemned.
Changing the form or giving sacred names to images does not change the act. Calling an image or statue by another name does not change the fact that it is an image or a statue. If you kneel to pay homage to it, lower your gaze before it, or burn incense to it, you do not please God: you please the idolatrous priest. If ancient Rome, which murdered the saints, continued doing this, there are no grounds to believe that it respected the message or that all the books of the Bible that emerged from its councils are free from its adulterations. I will point out one clue: you will never find a passage in the Gospels in which Jesus is shown describing what idols are and what idolatry is. Yet, according to the Bible’s own texts, idolatry was clearly described by Isaiah and Habakkuk.
Isaiah described how an image is carved from a tree, before which a man bows down to plead with it (Isaiah 44). Today, we are told that, by doing exactly that, they are not committing idolatry because, in reality, they are praying to God. Is God deaf if a piece of wood is not used to speak to Him?… Cynicism is the main characteristic of every false prophet. Habakkuk also describes how mute images are useless and curses those who pray to them (Habakkuk 2:18–19).
The same Bible tells us that, because of his words, Jesus was mistaken for the ancient prophets (Matthew 16:13–14). If he was mistaken for the prophets, it is logical that his messages would align with theirs. But isn’t it strange that there is not a single parable or message attributed to him that describes and condemns, so clearly, the worship of statues or images? I believe he did speak clearly about this, but Rome decided to remove that text because it made it uncomfortable.
It is also very strange that in Acts and other books of the New Testament, we do not see a clear description of what it means to worship images as idols. The only direct reference in the New Testament is in Revelation 9:20:
‘And the rest of the men who were not killed by these plagues still did not repent of the works of their hands, nor did they stop worshipping demons and images of gold, silver, bronze, stone, and wood, which can neither see, nor hear, nor walk’.
Despite this, the hypocritical guide says that they know their images are not God and that they know they cannot hear, speak, feel, or walk, but that even if people kneel before them, they do not worship them: they merely ‘venerate’ them.
As I told you, I do not place all my trust in a book that has been filtered by the empire of hypocrites. Basically, the Church of Rome has managed to get people to respect and worship its own monuments under different names: the supposed image of Jesus, a copy of the image of Zeus (Jupiter); the supposed image of Saint Michael, a copy of the Roman soldier whom they worshipped as the ‘god Mars’, wearing a military uniform and armor.
Given that canonization comes from that empire, it is foolish to trust blindly in its absolute faithfulness.
Where Are Jesus’ Messages About Idolatry?
When the practice of kneeling before statues, burning incense to them, or lowering one’s gaze before them is challenged, the cleric’s response is always the same semantic evasion: ‘We do not worship them; we only venerate them’. They change the verb, dress up the name, and pretend that the act is no longer idolatry.
However, if we examine the texts under a magnifying glass, a major historical anomaly emerges: the prophets of the Old Testament did not beat around the bush. Isaiah and Habakkuk described the harsh reality of idols in great detail: the cut log, the carved wood, the mute object that cannot see, hear, or walk, and the absolute condemnation of those who bow down before it. If Jesus was mistaken by the crowds for one of the ancient prophets, as Matthew 16 recounts, his discourse should have followed that same direct and unambiguous line.
So why do the Gospels and the epistles of Peter, Paul, and John maintain such a strange silence about the physical description of idolatry? The only direct allusion in the entire New Testament appears in isolation in Revelation 9:20, but it is insufficient given the scale of the problem. Is it logical that the apostles would have omitted such a fundamental warning?
This is where we must stop swallowing the official story whole. Through strategic filtering, the Roman Empire removed all messages that were uncomfortable or too explicit and that affected its interests. It is no coincidence that the Church of Rome recycled the monuments of imperial paganism under new names (the image of Zeus turned into that of Jesus, or the soldier Mars transformed into Saint Michael) to keep the masses kneeling.
Inevitable conclusion: Jesus never founded this religion. It was the Roman Empire that built Christianity upon incomplete texts that had been tampered with and adapted to suit its own purposes.
Proverbs 28:13 He who conceals his sins will not prosper, but whoever confesses and forsakes them will find mercy.
Do you confess that you have sinned through idolatry? I do confess it: I have sinned through idolatry. I knelt before Catholic images and treated them as idols are treated, just as thousands of people do before priests who tell them: ‘You do not worship these images; you only worship God under our guidance. We venerate these images affectionately, just as we treat a family photograph with affection’.
But look at the difference: you can tear up a family photograph when you decide you no longer need it, and nothing happens. Nobody condemns you; nobody calls you a ‘heretic’ for doing so. But an idolized image is never broken by the person who worships it, and there are people who will call you a ‘heretic’ if you do.
Do you know when I stopped committing the sin of worshipping images? When I informed myself and read Exodus 20:5, it became clear to me what the sin was, and I stopped doing it. But today, those who know that message look for five legs on a cat to keep demanding that people bend their knees before their images.
God loves those who have dignity and are capable of learning not to bend the knee to anything or anyone.
Look at how, just as in Exodus 20, God is not portrayed as loving everyone or condemning everyone. Isaiah 43:4 says: ‘Since you are precious in my eyes, worthy of honor, and I love you, I will give other men in your place, and other peoples in exchange for your life’.
Then we have the message in Daniel 12:10, where some sinners are described as being cleansed of their sins, while other sinners are not cleansed of their sins:
Daniel 12:10 Many shall be purified, made white, and refined; the wicked shall act wickedly, and none of the wicked shall understand, but the wise shall understand.
The wicked guides, on the contrary, make you sin in word and deed. Not only do they tell you that you do not idolize their images when, in reality, you do idolize them, but they also condemn you with your own words by declaring you guilty of your sin, by saying that you have ‘great guilt’ and that you ‘will continue sinning’, not only now, but even at ‘the hour of your death’.
Furthermore, they teach you to sin while you say it, because they teach you to direct that prayer not to God, but to an ‘intermediary’, as if God needed spokespeople to inform Him of people’s prayers, as if God were incapable of hearing them directly. In other words, they teach you to have other gods, because polytheists worshipped their various gods by praying to them. Then they tell you that they worship only God.
Did the supposed intermediary create the universe? Yet they demand that you direct your prayers not to one, but to several intermediaries, whom they call ‘saints’ to disguise what they are. Not only that, but the empire that justified the worship of its gods, renamed after saints, invented and/or distorted messages that the empire itself canonized to justify praying to created beings.
Then the question arises, along with its answer: Are all sinners equal in the eyes of God? No.
@JoseGalindoMMXXVI
2 hours ago (edited) Luis Toro, I listen to you in your video and see how you try to relativize the unacceptable. You attempt to construct an institutional defense using theological sleight of hand, but your arguments collapse under their own weight. Here I respond point by point to the exact moments in your intervention:
At minute 03:57, you come out saying that the problem of pederasty is not exclusive to the Church, mentioning that it also occurs among pastors, lawyers, or doctors, and explaining it on the premise that ‘the priest is still a human being, a sinful man’. My response: With that argument that ‘we are all sinners’, you seek to hide child rapists within the common lot of humanity, as if all human beings felt tempted to commit such wickedness. That is an intolerable slander against the just people who do exist in humanity. Not all human beings are predators. If we examine the Scriptures carefully, not all sinners are equal. A predator (a wolf: a child rapist) is not the same as a lost sheep (a righteous person who, for example, worships images out of ignorance, someone who sins through ignorance). You teach the righteous person Exodus 20:5, and he immediately abandons the sin —he is one of those spoken of in Daniel 12:10 as being cleansed of their sins. But if you teach a wolf Exodus 20:5, he will insist on worshipping images, saying that he does not ‘worship’ them, but merely venerates them, always looking for excuses to repeat the act that is described and condemned: bowing down before the image and paying it homage.
If you read Psalm 118, you will see that the righteous person is punished; if it were impossible for the righteous to sin, there would be no need for punishment. Notice that he later passes through the gates through which only the righteous pass, but ‘the nations’ (as the unrighteous are called) are destroyed; the destruction is the result of their recurring and deliberate sins. If God did not spare the men of Sodom who wanted to sexually assault Lot and the angels, why do you think God will spare those who rape children? It is impossible for God to forgive wickedness; God forgives the righteous person’s error arising from ignorance, but He never forgives the wickedness of the unrighteous. That is why Proverbs 16:4 says: ‘The Lord has made everything for Himself, even the wicked for the day of evil’.
At minute 06:15, you dare to say that, just as there was one Judas among every twelve apostles, there will be a ‘Judas’ among every twelve priests. My response: It must not be that way! You are trying to ask people to accept corruption by decree. If a Church calls itself holy, there must be nothing corrupt within it, no idol, no false teaching, and no depraved person hiding in religious habits. We are told that Judas betrayed Jesus, but I maintain that this story is false because it was told by the Empire that murdered the righteous man and because among the righteous there are never any traitors, nor could the unrighteous infiltrate their ranks without their rejection of messages of justice giving them away.
And, oh, what a coincidence! They denied the justice of an eye for an eye, but attributed that denial to their victim, portraying Jesus as a preacher of turning the other cheek to the enemy instead of defending the principle of an eye for an eye. If God never makes mistakes, then He did not make a mistake with the principle of an eye for an eye; Rome was wrong to reject it, and errors have consequences. Its deliberate sin against justice will never be forgiven. Do not misunderstand me: I am not defending the ‘Old Testament’ over the ‘New Testament’; the Empire respected neither the integrity of the branches nor that of the root.
At minute 10:09, you claim that if a pederast priest repents, God forgives him even if the laws of the world do not, addressing the issue of forgiveness for the transgressor. My response: God does not forgive the wicked because He knows that the wicked never repent and that He did not create them to become righteous. Scripture confirms this in Revelation 9:20: ‘And the rest of mankind, who were not killed by these plagues, did not even then repent of the works of their hands, nor did they stop worshipping the images of gold, silver, bronze, stone, and wood, which cannot see, hear, or walk’. That is why Daniel 12:10 is clear, and that is why Psalm 5:5–6 says: ‘The foolish shall not stand in Your sight; You hate all workers of iniquity. You shall destroy those who speak falsehood; the Lord abhors the bloodthirsty and deceitful man’.
They distract us with secondary contradictions that do not disprove the fundamental contradiction. Let us consider an example. In Matthew 26:48–49 and Mark 14:44–45, Judas had agreed to identify Jesus with a kiss: ‘The one I kiss, that is he’. By contrast, John 18:4–8 recounts that Jesus stepped forward, asked whom they were seeking, and, when they answered ‘Jesus of Nazareth’, replied: ‘I am he’. Both accounts present significant differences. If Judas had to identify Jesus with a kiss, why did Jesus step forward and identify himself? Conversely, if Jesus identified himself to those who had come to arrest him, why was there any need for Judas to identify him with a kiss?
However, these are not the most important contradictions. The fundamental problem is that we are asked to accept that the betrayal took place so that a prophecy would be fulfilled. I believe Rome invented the story of a traitor among the saints in order to usurp their place and establish a precedent for the members of its Church. Thus, whenever some atrocity was discovered, they could resort to the story and say: ‘If even Jesus had a traitor among his own, what can be expected of us?’
One of the reasons I claim that no such betrayal took place is this: Psalm 41 speaks of a man who acknowledges his sin and of a close companion who shares his bread and betrays him. How does that figure fit Jesus, whom they portray as a man who never sinned? The Bible itself states that Jesus committed no sin, yet they seek to identify him with the man described in that psalm.
Furthermore, Proverbs 29:27 establishes an opposition between the righteous and the wicked, while Psalm 58:10 portrays the righteous rejoicing at the sight of vengeance. If Jesus was righteous, how does the image of someone who renounces vengeance fit with these texts? Deuteronomy 32 presents a God who reserves vengeance for His enemies. And Revelation 15:3 mentions both the song of Moses and the song of the Lamb. If Jesus is the Lamb and his song is connected to that of Moses, how does that connection fit with the image of Jesus preaching universal love?
Comment posted on the video by priest Luis Toro: ‘WHY ARE THERE PEDERAST PRIESTS? LIVE QUESTIONS FROM ARGENTINA WITH FATHER LUIS TORO’ https://www.youtube.com/live/y2G5NnriaG8?si=Q3IKiKEnNHo4aH1E
«
«The Unpublished Parable: The Parable of the Infiltrated Messenger
Daniel 12:1 ‘At that time Michael shall stand up, the great prince who stands watch over the children of your people; and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that time; but at that time your people shall be delivered, everyone who is found written in the book.’
Do you believe that Michael stands up in an abstract and invisible world? Do you believe that from there he and his messengers wage war on behalf of the righteous? Do you not think it is more logical that they themselves are the righteous, using words as weapons because they are messengers?
To believe that the struggle takes place on a plane invisible to our senses is like believing that it does not exist and that we can do nothing for the side of justice; that is precisely what the Devil’s hosts want us to believe, just as they want us to believe that everything in the Bible is worthy of belief.
Because as the text itself says, the Devil deceives the world, and if he deceives the world, he does so with the texts that dominate the world, among them the Bible itself: Revelation 12:7-9 ‘And war broke out in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon and his angels fought back, but they could not prevail, and there was no longer any place for them in heaven. So the great dragon was cast out, that ancient serpent called the Devil and Satan, who deceives the whole world. He was cast down to the earth, and his angels were cast down with him.’
Next, through a fictional story, I am going to demonstrate logically why the Bible contains sacred texts infiltrated with texts from the enemy.
The Devil declared war on us and began striking us in the face. We had to defend ourselves, but someone came up with an idea.
It happened in a border kingdom.
The Devil’s men crossed the mountain passes under the fog. They entered the villages, burned the granaries, and slaughtered those who tried to resist.
The king urgently summoned his council.
—What shall we do? —he asked.
A captain of the garrison replied:
—Reinforce the walls.
A steward proposed:
—Arm the peasants.
An old veteran said:
—Hunt down the invaders before they attack again.
Then, from the shadows of the room, a man with a pale face and a gently persuasive voice stepped forward.
—I have a better idea —he said.
Everyone fell silent.
The stranger continued:
—When the enemy strikes you, do not respond with iron. Turn the other cheek.
A murmur spread through the hall.
The king, bewildered, asked:
—And when they burn the next village?
—Turn the other cheek.
—And when they kill the workers?
—Turn the other cheek.
—And if they reach the gates of the fortress?
The man smiled with serene piety.
—Then it will mean that there are still cheeks left to offer.
The counselors began to nod, fascinated by the apparent moral elevation of the speech.
But Gabriel, one of the chief princes, was not taken in.
Gabriel approached the unknown counselor and, looking him straight in the eyes, said:
—Tell me something: why would an attacked people accept the doctrine of disarming themselves?
The plunderer then remembered his own words while plundering peoples who had never before plundered his own: ‘Do not resist, let us plunder you in peace, if you do not want things to become worse for you.’ And then he replied:
—To attain holiness and peace.
Gabriel replied to him: —I did not ask you what word you use to sell it. I asked you whom that peace serves.
With one swift motion, Gabriel tore open his pilgrim’s robe.
Beneath it, dark steel gleamed, engraved with the coat of arms of the invaders.
The hall fell into absolute silence.
Gabriel said: ‘Notice the parallel, look at that face, look at the origin of his doctrine…’
2 Maccabees 6:1 Shortly afterward, the king sent an old man from the city of Athens to force the Jews to violate the laws of their ancestors and to organize their lives contrary to the laws of God, 2 to defile the temple in Jerusalem and dedicate it to the god Zeus Olympian, and to dedicate the temple on Mount Gerizim to Zeus the Hospitable, as the inhabitants of that place had requested.
‘His kingdom is the one that will come, and in his name they will sanctify the lie, his priests will worship his image and proclaim the words of his Greek sages; everything will be Hellenized to usurp our God, but I will confront him and his messengers; Michael will help me…’
Daniel 10:20 He said to me: Do you know why I have come to you? Now I must return to fight against the prince of Persia; and when I have finished with him, the prince of Greece will come. 21 But I will tell you what is written in the book of truth; and there is no one who helps me against them except Michael your prince.
)
The messenger had not invented the doctrine of non-resistance to save the kingdom.
He had introduced it to ensure that the kingdom would allow itself to be massacred without putting up a fight.
(Daniel 7:21 And I saw that this horn was waging war against the saints and prevailing against them… Revelation 13:7 And it was allowed to wage war against the saints and to overcome them. And it was given authority over every tribe, people, language, and nation.)
Some disguise these contradictions by calling them ‘mysteries’ or ‘differences in context.’ I do not; I show them without makeup: if one passage presents the righteous rejoicing at vengeance against the unrighteous —such as Psalm 58:10— and another presents it as exemplary for a righteous person to suffer for the unrighteous —such as 1 Peter 3:18—, we are not dealing with the same inspiring spirit. Thus you will find that the spirit of justice inspired some texts, while the spirit of injustice inspired other texts, those that were adulterated.
In one case, justice requires that the guilty person answer for his evil. In the other, it is accepted that the innocent person bear the guilt of another. They are opposing moral principles: one protects the righteous through the punishment of the guilty; the other glorifies the suffering of the righteous instead of the guilty.
Isaiah 33:1 Woe to you, plunderer, who have never been plundered, who act treacherously when no one has acted treacherously against you! When you finish plundering, you will be plundered; and when you finish acting treacherously, treachery will be committed against you.
Proverbs 11:8 The righteous person is delivered from trouble, but the wicked enters in his place.
Revelation 15:2 I also saw what appeared to be a sea of glass mixed with fire, and those who had conquered the beast, its image, and the number of its name, standing on the sea of glass, holding harps of God. Revelation 14:3 And they sang a new song before the throne and before the four living creatures and the elders; and no one could learn the song except the one hundred and forty-four thousand who had been redeemed from the earth. Daniel 12:10 Many will be purified, cleansed, and refined, but the wicked will continue to act wickedly; none of the wicked will understand, but those who have insight will understand.
«
«The religion I defend is named justice. █
I will find her when she finds me, and she will believe what I say.
The Roman Empire has betrayed humanity by inventing religions to subjugate it. All institutionalized religions are false. All the sacred books of those religions contain frauds. However, there are messages that make sense. And there are others, missing, that can be deduced from the legitimate messages of justice. Daniel 12:1-13 — ‘The prince who fights for justice will rise to receive God’s blessing.’ Proverbs 18:22 — ‘A wife is the blessing God gives to a man.’ Leviticus 21:14 — ‘He must marry a virgin of his own faith, for she is from his own people, who will be set free when the righteous rise.’
📚 What is an institutionalized religion? An institutionalized religion is when a spiritual belief is transformed into a formal power structure, designed to control people. It ceases to be an individual search for truth or justice and becomes a system dominated by human hierarchies, serving political, economic, or social power. What is just, true, or real no longer matters. The only thing that matters is obedience. An institutionalized religion includes: Churches, synagogues, mosques, temples. Powerful religious leaders (priests, pastors, rabbis, imams, popes, etc.). Manipulated and fraudulent ‘official’ sacred texts. Dogmas that cannot be questioned. Rules imposed on people’s personal lives. Mandatory rites and rituals in order to ‘belong.’ This is how the Roman Empire, and later other empires, used faith to subjugate people. They turned the sacred into a business. And truth into heresy. If you still believe that obeying a religion is the same as having faith, you were lied to. If you still trust their books, you trust the same people who crucified justice. It’s not God speaking in his temples. It’s Rome. And Rome never stopped speaking. Wake up. He who seeks justice needs no permission. Nor an institution.
She will find me, the virgin woman will believe me.
( – – )
This is the wheat in the Bible that destroys the Roman tares in the Bible:
Revelation 19:11
Then I saw heaven opened, and there was a white horse; and the one sitting on it was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness, he judges and makes war.
Revelation 19:19
Then I saw the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies gathered together to make war against the one sitting on the horse and against his army.
Psalm 2:2-4
‘The kings of the earth set themselves up, and the rulers took counsel together against the Lord and against his anointed, saying:
‘Let us break their bonds apart and cast away their cords from us.’
He who sits in the heavens laughs; the Lord mocks them.’
Now, some basic logic: if the horseman fights for justice, but the beast and the kings of the earth fight against this horseman, then the beast and the kings of the earth are against justice. Therefore, they represent the deception of the false religions that rule with them.
The whore of Babylon, which is the false church made by Rome, has considered herself to be ‘the wife of the Lord’s anointed,’ but the false prophets of this idol-selling and flattering word-peddling organization do not share the personal goals of the Lord’s anointed and the true saints, because the ungodly leaders have chosen for themselves the path of idolatry, celibacy, or sacramentalizing unholy marriages in exchange for money. Their religious headquarters are full of idols, including false holy books, before which they bow down:
Isaiah 2:8-11
8 Their land is full of idols; they bow down to the work of their hands, to what their fingers have made.
9 So the man is humbled, and the man is brought low; do not forgive them.
10 Go into the rock, hide yourself in the dust from the terror of the LORD and from the splendor of his majesty.
11 The arrogance of human eyes will be brought low, and the pride of men will be humbled; the LORD alone will be exalted on that day.
Proverbs 19:14
House and wealth are an inheritance from fathers, but a prudent wife is from the LORD.
Leviticus 21:14
The priest of the LORD shall not marry a widow, nor a divorced woman, nor an unclean woman, nor a harlot; he shall take a virgin from his own people as a wife.
Revelation 1:6
And he has made us kings and priests to his God and Father; to him be glory and dominion forever.
1 Corinthians 11:7
The woman is the glory of man.
What does it mean in Revelation that the beast and the kings of the earth wage war on the rider of the white horse and his army?
The meaning is clear, the world leaders are hand in glove with the false prophets who are disseminators of the false religions that are dominant among the kingdoms of the earth, for obvious reasons, that includes Christianity, Islam, etc. These rulers are against justice and truth, which are the values defended by the rider of the white horse and his army loyal to God. As is evident, the deception is part of the false sacred books that these accomplices defend with the label of ‘Authorized Books of Authorized Religions’, but the only religion that I defend is justice, I defend the right of the righteous not to be deceived with religious deceptions.
Revelation 19:19 Then I saw the beast and the kings of the earth and their armies gathered together to make war against the rider on the horse and against his army.
Now some basic logic, if the horseman stands for justice, but the beast and the kings of the earth fight against this horseman, then the beast and the kings of the earth are against justice, therefore they stand for the deception of the false religions that rule with them.
This is my story:
José, a young man raised in Catholic teachings, experienced a series of events marked by complex relationships and manipulations. At 19, he began a relationship with Monica, a possessive and jealous woman. Although Jose felt that he should end the relationship, his religious upbringing led him to try to change her with love. However, Monica’s jealousy intensified, especially towards Sandra, a classmate who was making advances on Jose.
Sandra began harassing him in 1995 with anonymous phone calls, in which she made noises with the keyboard and hung up.
On one of those occasions, she revealed that she was the one calling, after Jose angrily asked in the last call: ‘Who are you?’ Sandra called him immediately, but in that call she said: ‘Jose, who am I?’ Jose, recognizing her voice, said to her: ‘You are Sandra,’ to which she replied: ‘You already know who I am.’ Jose avoided confronting her. During that time, Monica, obsessed with Sandra, threatened Jose with harming Sandra, which led Jose to protect Sandra and prolong his relationship with Monica, despite his desire to end it.
Finally, in 1996, Jose broke up with Monica and decided to approach Sandra, who had initially shown interest in him. When Jose tried to talk to her about his feelings, Sandra did not allow him to explain himself, she treated him with offensive words and he did not understand the reason. Jose chose to distance himself, but in 1997 he believed he had the opportunity to talk to Sandra, hoping that she would explain her change of attitude and be able to share the feelings that she had kept silent. On her birthday in July, he called her as he had promised a year earlier when they were still friends—something he couldn’t do in 1996 because he was with Monica. At the time, he used to believe that promises should never be broken (Matthew 5:34-37), though now he understands that some promises and oaths can be reconsidered if made in error or if the person no longer deserves them. As he finished greeting her and was about to hang up, Sandra desperately pleaded, ‘Wait, wait, can we meet?’ That made him think she had reconsidered and would finally explain her change in attitude, allowing him to share the feelings he had kept silent. However, Sandra never gave him clear answers, maintaining the intrigue with evasive and counterproductive attitudes.
Faced with this attitude, Jose decided not to look for her anymore. It was then that constant telephone harassment began. The calls followed the same pattern as in 1995 and this time were directed to the house of his paternal grandmother, where Jose lived. He was convinced that it was Sandra, since Jose had recently given Sandra his number. These calls were constant, morning, afternoon, night, and early morning, and lasted for months. When a family member answered, they did not hang up, but when José answered, the clicking of the keys could be heard before hanging up.
Jose asked his aunt, the owner of the telephone line, to request a record of incoming calls from the telephone company. He planned to use that information as evidence to contact Sandra’s family and express his concern about what she was trying to achieve with this behavior. However, his aunt downplayed his argument and refused to help. Strangely, no one in the house, neither his aunt nor his paternal grandmother, seemed to be outraged by the fact that the calls also occurred in the early morning, and they did not bother to look into how to stop them or identify the person responsible.
This had the strange appearance of orchestrated torture. Even when José asked his aunt to unplug the phone at night so he could sleep, she refused, arguing that one of her sons, who lived in Italy, could call at any moment (considering the six-hour time difference between the two countries). What made things even stranger was Monica’s fixation on Sandra, even though they hadn’t even met. Monica didn’t attend the high school where José and Sandra were enrolled, but she began to feel jealous of Sandra after finding a folder with one of José’s group projects. The folder listed the names of two women, including Sandra, but for some strange reason, Monica became fixated only on Sandra’s name.
Although José initially ignored Sandra’s phone calls, over time he relented and contacted Sandra again, influenced by biblical teachings that advised praying for those who persecuted him. However, Sandra manipulated him emotionally, alternating between insults and requests for him to keep looking for her. After months of this cycle, Jose discovered that it was all a trap. Sandra falsely accused him of sexual harassment, and as if that wasn’t bad enough, Sandra sent some criminals to beat up Jose.
That Tuesday, without José knowing it, Sandra had already set a trap for him.
Days before, José had told his friend Johan about the situation he was going through with Sandra. Johan also suspected that Sandra’s strange behavior might be due to some kind of witchcraft by Mónica. That Tuesday, José visited his old neighborhood where he had lived in 1995 and happened to run into Johan. After hearing more details about the situation, Johan recommended that José forget about Sandra and instead go out to a nightclub to meet women—perhaps he would find someone who could make him forget her. José thought it was a good idea.
So they got on a bus and headed toward the nightclub in downtown Lima. Coincidentally, the route of that bus passed near the IDAT institute. Just one block before reaching IDAT, José suddenly had the idea to get off for a moment to pay for a Saturday course he had enrolled in. He had managed to save some money for it by selling his computer and working for a week in a warehouse. However, he had been forced to quit because they exploited workers with 16-hour shifts while officially recording only 12, and if they refused to complete the week, they were threatened with not being paid at all.
So José turned to Johan and said, ‘I study here on Saturdays. Since we’re passing by, let’s get off for a bit, I’ll pay for my course, and then we’ll head to the nightclub.’
The moment José stepped off the bus, before even crossing the avenue, he was shocked to see Sandra standing right there on the corner of the institute. In disbelief, he told Johan, ‘Johan, I can’t believe it—Sandra is right there. She’s the girl I told you about, the one who acts so strangely. Wait for me here; I’m going to ask if she got the letter where I warned her about Mónica’s threats against her, and maybe she can finally explain what’s going on with her and what she wants from me with all her calls.’
Johan stayed back as José approached. But as soon as he started speaking—’Sandra, did you see the letters? Can you finally explain to me what’s going on with you?’—Sandra, without saying a word, gestured with her hand, signaling three thugs who had been hiding in different spots: one in the middle of the avenue, another behind Sandra, and another behind José.
The one standing behind Sandra stepped forward and said, ‘So you’re the sexual harasser who’s been bothering my cousin?’
José, caught off guard, responded, ‘What? Me, a harasser? On the contrary, she’s the one harassing me! If you read the letter, you’d see it’s about me trying to understand why she keeps calling me!’
Before he could react, one of the thugs grabbed him by the neck from behind and threw him to the ground. Then, together with the one who had claimed to be Sandra’s cousin, they started kicking him. Meanwhile, the third thug went through his pockets, robbing him. It was three against one—José, lying helpless on the pavement.
Luckily, his friend Johan jumped into the fight, managing to give José a chance to get up. But then the third thug picked up some rocks and started throwing them at both José and Johan.
The attack only stopped when a traffic officer intervened. The officer turned to Sandra and said, ‘If he’s harassing you, then file a complaint.’
Sandra, visibly nervous, quickly left, knowing full well that her accusation was false.
José, though deeply betrayed, did not go to the police. He had no way to prove the months of harassment he had suffered from Sandra. But beyond the shock of her betrayal, one question haunted him:
‘How did she already have this ambush set up when I never come to this place on Tuesday nights? I only come here to study on Saturday mornings.’
This made José suspect that Sandra wasn’t just an ordinary person—she might be a witch with some kind of supernatural power.
These events left a deep mark on Jose, who seeks justice and to expose those who manipulated him. In addition, he seeks to derail the advice in the Bible, such as: pray for those who insult you, because by following that advice, he fell into Sandra’s trap.
Jose’s testimony.
I am José Carlos Galindo Hinostroza, the author of the blog: https://gabriels.work
I was born in Peru, that photo is mine, it is from 1997, I was 22 years old.
At that time, I was entangled in the intrigues of Sandra Elizabeth, a former classmate from the IDAT institute. I was confused about what was happening to her (She harassed me in a very complex and extensive way to narrate in this image, but I narrate it at the bottom of this blog: and in this video:
). I did not rule out the possibility that Mónica Nieves, my ex-girlfriend, had done some witchcraft to her.
When searching for answers in the Bible, I read in Matthew 5:
‘ Pray for whoever insults you,’
And in those days, Sandra insulted me while telling me she didn’t know what was happening to her, that she wanted to continue being my friend, and that I should keep calling and looking for her again and again, and it went on like this for five months. In short, Sandra pretended to be possessed by something to keep me confused. The lies in the Bible made me believe that good people can behave evilly because of an evil spirit. That’s why the advice to pray for her didn’t seem so crazy to me—because before, Sandra pretended to be a friend, and I fell for her deception.
Thieves often use the strategy of pretending to have good intentions: To steal from stores, they pretend to be customers; to ask for tithes, they pretend to preach the word of God, but they preach that of Rome, etc., etc. Sandra Elizabeth pretended to be a friend, then pretended to be a friend in trouble looking for my help, but all to slander me and ambush me with three criminals, surely out of spite because a year earlier I rejected her advances since I was in love with Monica Nieves, to whom I was faithful. But Monica did not trust my fidelity and threatened to kill Sandra Elizabeth, which is why I broke up with Monica slowly, over eight months, so that Monica wouldn’t think it was because of Sandra. But this is how Sandra Elizabeth paid me back—with slander. She falsely accused me of sexually harassing her, and with that pretext, she ordered three criminals to beat me up—all in front of her.
I narrate all this in my blog and in my YouTube videos:
I do not wish for other righteous men to have bad experiences like I had, which is why I have created what you are reading. I know this will irritate unrighteous people like Sandra, but the truth is like the true gospel—it only favors the righteous.
The evil of José’s family overshadows Sandra’s evil:
José suffered a devastating betrayal by his own family, who not only refused to help him stop Sandra’s harassment but also falsely accused him of having a mental illness. His own relatives used these accusations as a pretext to kidnap and torture him, sending him twice to mental health institutions and a third time to a hospital.
It all began when José read Exodus 20:5 and stopped being Catholic. From that moment on, he became outraged by the Church’s dogmas and started protesting against its doctrines on his own. He also advised his relatives to stop praying to images and told them that he was praying for a friend (Sandra) who was apparently bewitched or possessed. José was under stress due to the harassment, but his relatives did not tolerate him exercising his freedom of religious expression. As a result, they destroyed his professional life, his health, and his reputation by locking him up in mental institutions where he was given sedatives.
Not only was he forcibly institutionalized, but after his release, he was forced to continue taking psychiatric medication under the threat of being locked up again. He fought to break free from those chains, and during the last two years of that injustice, with his programming career ruined, he was forced to work without pay at his uncle’s restaurant. That same uncle betrayed his trust by secretly drugging his meals with psychiatric pills. José only discovered the truth in 2007 thanks to a kitchen assistant named Lidia, who warned him about what was happening.
From 1998 to 2007, José lost nearly ten years of his youth due to his treacherous relatives. In hindsight, he realized that his mistake was defending the Bible to reject Catholicism, as his family never allowed him to read it. They committed this injustice knowing he had no financial resources to defend himself. When he finally broke free from the forced medication, he thought he had earned their respect. His maternal uncles and cousins even offered him a job, but years later, they betrayed him again with such hostility that he was forced to resign. This made him realize that he should never have forgiven them, as their bad intentions were clear.
From that moment on, he decided to study the Bible again, and in 2017, he began noticing its contradictions. Little by little, he understood why God had allowed his relatives to prevent him from defending the Bible in his youth. He discovered biblical inconsistencies and started exposing them in his blogs, where he also recounted the story of his faith and the suffering he endured at the hands of Sandra and, most of all, his own family.
For this reason, in December 2018, his mother attempted to kidnap him again with the help of corrupt police officers and a psychiatrist who issued a false certificate. They accused him of being a ‘dangerous schizophrenic’ to have him institutionalized again, but the attempt failed because he was not home. There were witnesses to the incident, and José had audio recordings, which he presented as evidence to the Peruvian authorities in his complaint, but it was dismissed.
His family knew perfectly well that he was not insane—he had a stable job, a child, and the mother of his child to take care of. However, despite knowing the truth, they attempted to kidnap him again using the same old false accusation. His own mother and other fanatical Catholic relatives led the attempt. Although his complaint was ignored by the Ministry, José exposes these truths in his blogs, making it clear that the evil of his family eclipses even that of Sandra.
Here is the evidence of the kidnappings using the slander of traitors:
‘This man is a schizophrenic who urgently needs psychiatric treatment and pills for life.’
I have been a computer programmer, I like logic, in Turbo Pascal I created a program capable of producing basic algebra formulas at random, similar to the formula below. In the following document in .PDF you can download the code of the program, this is proof that I’m not stupid, that’s why the conclusions of my research should be taken seriously. https://ntiend.me/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/math21.pdf
If A*91=720 then A=7.912 «Cupid is condemned to hell along with the other pagan gods (The fallen angels for their rebellion against justice, sent to eternal punishment). █
Quoting these passages does not mean defending the entire Bible. If 1 John 5:19 says that “the whole world is under the power of the evil one,” but rulers swear on the Bible, then the Devil rules with them. If the Devil rules with them, then fraud also rules with them. Therefore, the Bible contains part of that fraud, camouflaged among truths. By connecting those truths, we can expose their deceptions. Righteous people need to know these truths so that, if they have been deceived by lies added to the Bible or other similar books, they can free themselves from them.
Daniel 12:7 And I heard the man clothed in linen, who was above the waters of the river, when he raised his right hand and his left hand to heaven and swore by Him who lives forever that it shall be for a time, times, and half a time. And when the power of the holy people is completely shattered, all these things shall be finished.
Considering that ‘Devil’ means ‘Slanderer,’ it is natural to expect that the Roman persecutors, being the adversaries of the saints, later bore false witness against the saints and their messages. Thus, they themselves are the Devil, and not an intangible entity that enters and exits people, as they made us believe precisely with passages like Luke 22:3 (“Then Satan entered Judas…”), Mark 5:12-13 (the demons entering the pigs), and John 13:27 (“After the morsel, Satan entered him”).
This is my purpose: to help righteous people not waste their power believing in the lies of impostors who have adulterated the original message, which never asked anyone to kneel before anything or pray to anything that had ever been visible.
It is no coincidence that in this image, promoted by the Roman Church, Cupid appears alongside other pagan gods. They have given the names of the true saints to these false gods, but look at how these men dress and how they wear their long hair. All this goes against faithfulness to God’s laws because it is a sign of rebellion, a sign of the fallen angels (Deuteronomy 22:5).
The serpent, the devil, or Satan (the slanderer) in hell (Isaiah 66:24, Mark 9:44). Matthew 25:41: “Then he will also say to those on his left: ‘Depart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire that has been prepared for the devil and his angels’.” Hell: the eternal fire prepared for the serpent and his angels (Revelation 12:7-12), for having combined truths with heresies in the Bible, the Quran, the Torah, and for having created false forbidden gospels that they called apocryphal, to give credibility to lies in the false sacred books, all in rebellion against justice.
Book of Enoch 95:6: “Woe to you, false witnesses and to those who weigh the price of injustice, for you will perish suddenly!” Book of Enoch 95:7: “Woe to you, unjust ones who persecute the righteous, for you yourselves will be handed over and persecuted because of that injustice, and the burden of your guilt will fall upon you!” Proverbs 11:8: “The righteous is delivered from trouble, and the wicked comes in his place.” Proverbs 16:4: “The Lord has made all things for Himself, even the wicked for the day of doom.”
Book of Enoch 94:10: “Unjust ones, I say to you that He who created you will overthrow you; upon your ruin, God will have no mercy, but rather, God will rejoice in your destruction.” Satan and his angels in hell: the second death. They deserve it for lying against Christ and His faithful disciples, accusing them of being the authors of Rome’s blasphemies in the Bible, such as love for the devil (the enemy).
Isaiah 66:24: “And they shall go out and look upon the corpses of the men who have rebelled against me; for their worm shall never die, nor shall their fire be quenched, and they shall be abhorrent to all flesh.” Mark 9:44: “Where their worm does not die, and the fire is never quenched.” Revelation 20:14: “Then Death and Hades were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death: the lake of fire.”
The false prophet wants fame; the true prophet wants justice.
Those who defend incoherence, mute idols, and contradictory doctrines claim the title of ‘sane’. While the one who demands coherence, justice, and non-idolatry is treated as ‘crazy’.
Excuses of wolves, dismantled by reason: “We are all sinners,” but not all of us are wolves in sheep’s clothing.
The first victims of war are the slaves who could not refuse forced conscription. The tyrant does not kill the enemy first, he kills his own.
Word of Satan: ‘Blessed are those who do not seek justice now… but wait to receive it at my fantastic return from the clouds…, thus the thieves who worship my image live without fearing eye for an eye, while their victims eternally await justice.’
For the war business to work, a convincing politician, an opportunistic arms dealer, and people convinced while alive—or forced—to believe they will die for a good cause are needed.
They bend the will with statues, so that they march submissively to the government’s wars.
Word of Satan: ‘It hurts but you like it. You are blessed for following my message of offering the other cheek to your enemy and loving him.’
The false prophet absolves you of every sin, except the sin of thinking for yourself.
Satan confessed: ‘I have not come to call the righteous to help them, but to make them believe that the wicked can treat them well if they treat them well first.’
하나님의 눈에는 모든 죄인이 똑같은가? https://gabriels.work/2026/10/29/idi30sinners/
Mi religión es la justicia. https://ellameencontrara.com/2026/03/22/la-religion-que-yo-defiendo-se-llama-la-justicia/
Cowards impose unjust rules; but the just ones break them with powerful reasons that, due to their superiority, prevail over those of the cowards. It’s bigger than we imagined. Excuses of wolves, dismantled by reason: “Don’t judge him, pray for him,” but praying for a wolf won’t turn it into a sheep.»
