This challenges everything we’ve been taught. Word of Satan: ‘Hypocrites, bring me that papal coin, whose face is it? Give to Caesar what is Caesar’s… for my kingdom thrives on your tributes while my priests enrich themselves with what you call offerings’. Excuses of wolves, dismantled by reason: “Nobody is perfect,” but you don’t need perfection to not be a criminal.
The business of baptism does not need innocents who do not sin. The false prophet: ‘No one is a sheep, so there are no lost sheep; we are all wolves. Your little wolf needs to be baptized in my church to be cleansed of his sins. Just like you and me, he was born with original sin. Bowing before our images with us is not a sin; on the contrary, it is a sin not to do it with us every Sunday. This is only a first ritual; make him follow this set of rituals and let him continue bowing all his life before our images, to free his soul from condemnation (ours). Last but not least: give us your donations and pay for each one of these sacraments. Keeping these temples clean and the statues well dressed is never free.’ //56
Proverbs 29:27: ‘The righteous detest the wicked, and the wicked detest those who walk in uprightness.’ Proverbs 17:15: ‘He who justifies the wicked and he who condemns the righteous, both are an abomination to Jehovah.’ When Pope Francis says that no one deserves the death penalty because human dignity always prevails, and when he says that God loves everyone, Francis is saying: ‘This murderer has dignity, deserves life, and Jehovah loves him.’ [ROME — Pope Francis has declared that the death penalty is unacceptable… …in all cases ‘because it constitutes an attack on the inviolability and dignity of the person,’ the Vatican announced on August 2, thus reversing Roman Catholic teachings on this issue. August 2, 2018 – nytimes . com] 2 Thessalonians 2:8: ‘The lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord Jesus will kill with the breath of his mouth.’ Pope Francis declared that the death penalty is unacceptable in all cases, saying: ‘There is a growing awareness that the dignity of the person is not lost even after the commission of very serious crimes.’ Proverbs 28:4: ‘Those who forsake the law praise the wicked, but those who keep the law contend with them.’ Isaiah 11:4: ‘He will strike the wicked with the breath of his lips.’ If the religion of Jesus were linked to the law and the prophets, and Rome did not respect his message, it is logical to conclude that it did not respect either the law or the prophets. Therefore, the contradictions in the texts that Rome ended up calling the ‘Old Testament’ are not surprising. I will show you some examples: Genesis 4:15: murderer protected from the death penalty. Numbers 35:33: murderer condemned to death. Ezekiel 33:18-20: the righteous can become wicked, and the wicked can become righteous, versus Daniel 12:10: the righteous cannot become wicked, and the wicked cannot become righteous. Now, if the wicked could truly become righteous, the original message of Jesus would not have been persecuted by anyone, but accepted by all. //88
Ayudando al pensamiento crítico a sacudirse de dogmas impuestos desde la niñez. Soy creador del blog: https://ntiend.me (https://gabriels.work).
Este blog no solo está en español y tiene como propósito respetar la inteligencia frente al dogma.
Este blog no fue creado para defender la Biblia ni para buscarle una interpretación alternativa, porque eso sería darle crédito como un bloque coherente de mensajes. Los textos allí atribuidos a los santos contienen contradicciones demasiado numerosas para etiquetarlas como simples accidentes o diferencias de interpretación. Mientras se atribuye a los santos mensajes tanto de amor como de odio hacia sus enemigos, aquí hay gato encerrado. La cuestión no es cómo interpretar la Biblia o sus enigmas, sino saber hasta dónde llegan las raíces del engaño: si los mensajes están adulterados, no tiene sentido perder el tiempo intentando descifrar enigmas bíblicos posiblemente adulterados por la mano que mató a los santos y se apoderó de sus escritos para arrogarse la autoridad moral de determinar qué escritura, original o escrita por esa mano asesina, debía considerarse “la verdad” y cuál no.
//
Helping critical thinking shake off the dogmas imposed since childhood. I am the creator of the blog: https://ntiend.me (https://gabriels.work).
This blog is not only in Spanish and is intended to respect intelligence in the face of dogma.
This blog was not created to defend the Bible or to seek an alternative interpretation of it, because that would give it credit as a coherent body of messages. The texts attributed there to the saints contain far too many contradictions to dismiss them as mere accidents or differences in interpretation. While the saints are attributed with messages expressing both love and hatred toward their enemies, there is something fishy going on here. The question is not how to interpret the Bible or its enigmas, but rather how deep the roots of the deception go: if the messages have been adulterated, there is no point wasting time trying to decipher biblical enigmas possibly adulterated by the hand that killed the saints and seized their writings in order to arrogate to itself the moral authority to determine which writing, original or written by that murderous hand, was to be considered “the truth” and which was not.
Ver todas las entradas de José Carlos Galindo Hinostroza
GABRIELS.WORK 