An ancient god of the Roman Empire hidden in labels █
History demonstrates that the victors of a war impose their religion. You will understand this at the end.
1 Corinthians 11:1–16. Paul says: ‘Imitate me, as I imitate Jesus.’
In that same passage, Paul states that it is dishonorable for a man to have long hair. Therefore, Paul would not imitate something that he himself disapproves of.
From this, it follows that Jesus did not have long hair. The image disseminated and attributed to Jesus does not depict the Jesus whom Paul imitated.
Now let us think. What gods did Rome worship in the time of Jesus?
Rome worshipped Zeus, also called Jupiter. Then the question arises: why does the image attributed to Jesus look so much like Jupiter?
The God of Jesus is the God of Moses. And according to Deuteronomy 4, God did not show Himself in any form, precisely to prevent idolatry.
So why is God preached as having become man and why is it demanded that he be worshipped?
Hebrews 1:6 commands the worship of a man. This is very suspicious.
Furthermore, it contradicts the exclusive worship of Yahweh expressed in Psalm 97:7.
Rome persecuted Jesus and persecuted the saints. Did it really respect the message it persecuted?
Did Rome abandon its god… or did it merely change his name on the plaque of its sculptures?
When Rome persecuted Jesus and his followers, Rome considered itself victorious. And victors do not learn from the defeated: they redefine them.
Revelation 13:7 says that it was allowed to wage war against the saints and conquer them, and that it was given authority over every tribe, people, language, and nation.
If injustice did not reign in the world and if there were no global interconnectedness that allows dominant religions to be imposed, that time would not have arrived yet.
Simulated dialogue:
Zeus asks to be imitated, to be accepted as the truth and the life.
Paul responds:
‘I do not imitate that man. Long hair is a disgrace for a man. The truth is not a man or some pagan god; the truth is coherent information, and life is not limited to a single creature.’
Zeus replies: ‘Paul… you denied me three times.’
Jesus says: ‘Paul, you defended my honor. Rome slandered you. You never said “let every man be subject to all authority.” If you had said that, they would not have beheaded you.
Did you notice that Rome never quoted me denouncing idols when it spoke about me? It silenced me for doing so, for not worshipping the beast or its image, just as happened to you.
With this I am not saying that the guidance is what was called the “Old Testament” or that the manipulation is found only in what was called the “New Testament.” He who hates the tree hates its root.
If 1 John 2:1 says that Jesus is righteous, and Proverbs 29:27 says that the righteous hate the wicked, then the teaching attributed to Jesus in Matthew 5:44 could not have been Jesus’ teaching.
When a message is incoherent or contradictory, there is no pure truth: there is manipulation. This does not depend on dates attributed to the writings, but on who had the texts and the power to decide what was “canonical.”
It was not prophets who decided that, but Roman emperors capable of erasing or rewriting even older texts to impose an imperial narrative.
If we apply this saying to the Roman Empire and its gods…
Luke 11:21 When a strong man, fully armed, guards his palace, his possessions are in peace. 22 But when someone stronger than he comes and overcomes him, he takes away all the weapons in which he trusted, and divides the spoils.
What do I see here? The god Mars taking a saint’s name that does not belong to him: Michael.
This through the priests who worship his image.
And here I see the god Zeus taking an attribution belonging to a saint that does not belong to him: Christ.
This through the priests who worship his image.
Intellect is a force…
And now the final question:
If Jesus had short hair, who do you see on that cross?
I consider these words to be prophecies:
Proverbs 11:8 The righteous are delivered from trouble, but the wicked enter in their place.
Daniel 12:1 = At that time Michael (the righteous) will arise…, and there will be a time of distress such as never occurred from the beginning of nations until then; but at that time all those who are found written in the book (the righteous) will be delivered.
Ayudando al pensamiento crítico a sacudirse de dogmas impuestos desde la niñez. Soy creador del blog: https://ntiend.me (https://gabriels.work).
Este blog no solo está en español y tiene como propósito respetar la inteligencia frente al dogma.
Este blog no fue creado para defender la Biblia ni para buscarle una interpretación alternativa, porque eso sería darle crédito como un bloque coherente de mensajes. Los textos allí atribuidos a los santos contienen contradicciones demasiado numerosas para etiquetarlas como simples accidentes o diferencias de interpretación. Mientras se atribuye a los santos mensajes tanto de amor como de odio hacia sus enemigos, aquí hay gato encerrado. La cuestión no es cómo interpretar la Biblia o sus enigmas, sino saber hasta dónde llegan las raíces del engaño: si los mensajes están adulterados, no tiene sentido perder el tiempo intentando descifrar enigmas bíblicos posiblemente adulterados por la mano que mató a los santos y se apoderó de sus escritos para arrogarse la autoridad moral de determinar qué escritura, original o escrita por esa mano asesina, debía considerarse “la verdad” y cuál no.
//
Helping critical thinking shake off the dogmas imposed since childhood. I am the creator of the blog: https://ntiend.me (https://gabriels.work).
This blog is not only in Spanish and is intended to respect intelligence in the face of dogma.
This blog was not created to defend the Bible or to seek an alternative interpretation of it, because that would give it credit as a coherent body of messages. The texts attributed there to the saints contain far too many contradictions to dismiss them as mere accidents or differences in interpretation. While the saints are attributed with messages expressing both love and hatred toward their enemies, there is something fishy going on here. The question is not how to interpret the Bible or its enigmas, but rather how deep the roots of the deception go: if the messages have been adulterated, there is no point wasting time trying to decipher biblical enigmas possibly adulterated by the hand that killed the saints and seized their writings in order to arrogate to itself the moral authority to determine which writing, original or written by that murderous hand, was to be considered “the truth” and which was not.
Ver todas las entradas de José Carlos Galindo Hinostroza
