Both prophecy itself and reality demonstrate that love toward a wicked enemy does not work to stop him. Why would the historical Jesus contradict the most basic logic of survival? The answer is that he did not; it was his enemies who attributed that teaching to him in order to mentally disarm the oppressed. The true origin of sayings such as «Do good to your friends and your enemies, for in this way you will preserve the former and win over the latter» does not come from a divine revelation, but from the Greek philosopher Cleobulus of Lindos, centuries before Christ. The «Babylonian» system took these pagan philosophies of submission and inserted them into the text so that the persecuted would love and forgive their own murderers.
This pacifying insertion clashes head-on with the true spirit of the ancient scriptures. For example, in Psalm 109, the psalmist does not ask to «love» the one who repays him evil for good. On the contrary, in the face of the mouth of the liar and the deceiver, the plea is radical: «Appoint a wicked man over him, and let Satan stand at his right hand. When he is judged, let him be condemned; and let his prayer become sin. Let his days be few, and let another take his office.» That is the natural cry for justice against the oppressor, not the artificial submission that the empire wanted to sell us.
When Revelation 18:4 says, «Come out of her, my people, lest you share in her sins», perhaps the call is not merely to leave a physical church, but to leave the deception of its edited book. Questioning the manipulation of the text is the first step toward not becoming accomplices of an idolatrous system that wants us submissive, silenced, and on our knees before our persecutors.
The Babylonian system did not kill out of political whim; it killed because of idolatry. In historical Babylon, whoever refused to bow before the statue of Marduk or the king was eliminated, because the State and religion were one and the same. The Roman system inherited this exactly: the worship of images, structures, and deified men. The saints were not murdered for being «bad citizens», but because their absolute refusal to participate in the system’s idolatry exposed the falsehood of the imperial religion. By refusing to bow before the new pantheon of statues disguised as piety, they signed their own death sentence.
The Roman/Babylonian Empire assimilated the writings, filtered them, edited them to insert texts of submission (such as the ethical plagiarism of Cleobulus of Lindos), and burned the originals. But they made a miscalculation, or the weight of the text proved greater: they left the code «Babylon» intact. They thought that, since Babylon was a city that had already lain in ruins and oblivion for centuries, no one would understand that the accusing finger of Revelation was pointing directly at them, the new idolaters clothed in purple and scarlet.
«The saints knew that their lives were numbered before the idolatrous monster, but they also knew that the system would try to absorb their words. Therefore, they planted a code indecipherable to the tyrants of their own age, yet crystal clear to posterity. By calling their persecutor «Babylon», knowing that historical Babylon had been dead for centuries, they left a time capsule. In their arrogance, the empire edited the book to demand submission, yet preserved the code without realizing that they were distributing the evidence of their own crime. They left it there so that today, those with understanding may know with mathematical precision whom the saints were accusing before being murdered for rejecting their idolatry.»
«And the supreme proof that this system is idolatrous lies in the very reason for the execution of the saints. The text is specific: they were not killed over a mere difference of opinion; they were killed «for not worshiping the beast and its image». Babylon’s DNA has always been the same: to force the nations to bow before statues of stone and wood. The saints knew they were going to die, but by recording that the central conflict was the worship of an image, they planted a landmine within the empire’s own book. They left it there so that posterity would understand that the very system which today demands that you bow before images is the same system that shed the blood of those who refused to do so.»
- The Central Contradiction as Evidence of Editorial Manipulation
The image exposes an ethically and historically unsustainable conflict:
- The side of true resistance: During the time of the Maccabees (under the Seleucid Empire of Antiochus IV Epiphanes), forcing the Jews to eat pork went hand in hand with profaning the Temple, erecting altars to Zeus, and compelling them to worship idols. Dying rather than eating pork was the supreme symbol of radical resistance against imperial idolatry.
- The side of the edited system: Centuries later, the New Testament canonized by Rome (Mark 7:19, Matthew 15:11, 1 Timothy 4:1–5) suddenly introduces the doctrine that «you may eat everything» and that «what enters the mouth does not defile».
For a free-thinking analyst, the question is inevitable: How is it possible that what had once been the very core of faithfulness, and the reason why the saints surrendered their bodies to martyrdom, is suddenly abolished with a declaration that «everything is clean»? This is not spiritual evolution; it is the editorial line of the Roman Empire (a Gentile empire and a consumer of pork), which needed to eradicate the Jewish laws of resistance in order to assimilate new believers into pagan Roman customs.
- The Link with the Babylonian-Roman Cult
Why did the Roman system edit the text to permit eating everything? Because the purpose of «Babylon» is cultural assimilation through syncretism. Historical Babylon absorbed the gods and customs of conquered peoples and unified them into its material cult. The Roman Empire did exactly the same: in order to create a universal religion (Catholicism) that would serve as the political glue of the empire, it removed the dietary and purity barriers that separated the true believers from the idolatrous Gentiles. By legalizing the consumption of previously forbidden foods, they made it easier for paganism to enter en masse without having to abandon its customs.
The Filter of the Righteous – The True People
«This is where the deception of the system completely falls apart. Roman theology has sold us a universalist God who supposedly wants to save everyone equally. But the text contradicts them. When the voice from heaven cries out, «Come out of her, my people», it is not speaking to all humanity, nor is it speaking to the members of the official Christian religion. It is speaking to a select group who already belonged to Him, but who are trapped and ignorant within the Babylonian system.
God is a God of justice, and His design is selective. If He wanted to save everyone, He would do so, because He accomplishes whatever He purposes. But the call is a filter. As Daniel 12 prophesied, in the time of the end there arises the urgent need to guide the righteous who, for lack of knowledge, are sinning against justice by remaining submissive within Babylon. Michael’s deliverance is only for those who are written in the Book of Blessing, for the righteous spoken of in Psalm 118. Coming out of Babylon is not a call for the masses; it is a signal of awakening reserved exclusively for those with understanding.»
Official dogma casually claims that salvation comes simply «by hearing». But basic logic tells us that the «good news» is not universal. What is excellent news of justice for the oppressed sheep is terrible news for the unjust and the oppressor. Hearing does not change the nature of things.
Historically, when confronted with the original message, we see two clear groups: those who spread it and those who persecuted it in order to destroy it. It is obvious that the Roman Empire and its religious apparatus belonged to the second group. They were wolves, not sheep. A shepherd guides and seeks the lost sheep; but a wolf is not guided—a wolf is hunted.
So we must reason coldly: if the cunning wolf—the Roman persecutor—managed to confiscate and take absolute control of the message that had been designed to guide and protect the sheep, what do you think he did with it? The wolf was not going to preserve intact a guide that exposed him or strengthened his prey. The logical, predictable outcome is that the text was adulterated by his canine hands.
They modified the editorial line for their own benefit. They inserted the theology of submission and the deception that the wolf is merely a «stray sheep» who must be forgiven and loved. Why? So that the wolf could camouflage himself, infiltrate the flock, and approach his prey without raising any alarm, using the adulterated text itself as the perfect tool for hunting sheep legally.
This argument exposes the naivety of believing that the persecutor became a faithful guardian of the persecuted people’s truth. It lays bare the system’s strategy of control and assimilation.
Appendices: MESSAGES IN THE IMAGES – Image 1 – Image 2
Prophecy shows that love for a wicked enemy does not work: Why would Jesus contradict these teachings?
He did not. His enemies did, but they blamed Him for it.
Find below the true origin of these teachings:
Source: azquotes.com/author/37905-Cleobulus
«We should render a service to a friend to bind him closer to us, and to an enemy in order to make a friend of him.»
— Cleobulus
Source: mundifrases.com/frases-de/cleobulo-de-lindos/
«Any man, at any moment in life, can be your friend or your enemy, depending on how you conduct yourself toward him.»
— Cleobulus of Lindos
«Do good to your friends and your enemies, for in this way you will keep the former and may be able to win over the latter.»
— Cleobulus of Lindos
Psalm 109:1–8
1 Do not remain silent, O God of my praise;
2 For the mouth of the wicked and the mouth of the deceitful have opened against me; they have spoken against me with a lying tongue.
3 They have surrounded me also with words of hatred, and fought against me without a cause.
4 In return for my love they are my adversaries, but I give myself to prayer.
5 They have repaid me evil for good, and hatred for my love.
6 Set a wicked man over him, and let Satan stand at his right hand.
7 When he is judged, let him be condemned, and let his prayer become sin.
8 Let his days be few, and let another take his office.
Sirach also warns against doing good to the wicked enemy:
Sirach 12:1–6
1 When you do good, consider carefully to whom you are doing it, and you will be able to expect something from your good deed.
2 Do a favor to the good person, and you will receive a reward, if not from him, then from the Lord.
3 Helping the wicked brings no good; it is not even a good deed.
4 In time of need, he will do you double harm for all the good you have done to him.
5 Do not give him weapons of war, lest he attack you with them.
6 God also abhors the wicked and will give them their punishment.
THE BIBLE AND ITS CONTRADICTIONS REGARDING FOOD
1. THE LAW AND THE COMMANDMENTS FIRST PROHIBIT CERTAIN FOODS
DEUTERONOMY 14:8
«And the pig, because it has a split hoof but does not chew the cud, shall be unclean to you; you shall not eat of their flesh…»
2 MACCABEES 6: (2,18,30)
«And the king defiled the Temple of Jerusalem and built there an altar to Olympian Zeus; and in the holy places he worshiped the gods of the Gentiles, and forced the Jews to eat pork, causing them to abandon the laws of their ancestors.»
2 MACCABEES 7:30
«Like my brothers, I surrender my body and my life for the laws of our fathers.»
(The seven brothers and their mother chose to die rather than eat pork, out of faithfulness to the Law of God.)
SUMMARY OF THIS SECTION
For faithful Jews, eating pork was a sin and an abomination. Many chose to die rather than break God’s Law.
HISTORICAL CONTEXT
King Antiochus IV Epiphanes (Seleucid Empire) desecrates the Temple of Jerusalem and forbids Jewish religious practices.
167 B.C.
Antiochus IV forbids Jewish practices and commands the worship of idols; he also forbids foods permitted by the Law.
↓
167–166 B.C.
Mattathias begins the revolt.
↓
167–160 B.C.
Judas Maccabeus leads the struggle against the Seleucids.
↓
164 B.C.
The people recover and purify the Temple of Jerusalem.
(Hanukkah is celebrated.)
↓
160 B.C.
Judas Maccabeus dies in battle.
The MARTYRDOMS (including the seven brothers of 2 Maccabees) took place approximately between 167 and 164 B.C.
CENTRAL CONTRADICTION
How can it be that, during that same period, it is taught that what enters the mouth no longer defiles, if previously dying rather than eating pork was considered the supreme act of faithfulness to God?
2. THE MESSAGE OF THE NEW TESTAMENT AND OTHER TEXTS: EVERYTHING MAY BE EATEN
MARK 7:19
«Because it does not enter his heart, but his stomach, and then goes out into the latrine.» Thus He declared all foods clean.
MATTHEW 15:11
«It is not what enters the mouth that defiles a man, but what comes out of the mouth; this is what defiles a man.»
1 TIMOTHY 4:1–5
«They will forbid marriage and command people to abstain from foods that God created to be received with thanksgiving by those who believe and know the truth. For everything God created is good, and nothing is to be rejected if it is received with thanksgiving, because it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer.»
COLOSSIANS 2:16
«Therefore let no one judge you in regard to food or drink, or with respect to a festival, a New Moon, or Sabbaths.»
ROMANS 14:14
«I know and am persuaded in the Lord Jesus that nothing is unclean in itself…»
TITUS 1:15
«To the pure, all things are pure; but to the corrupt and unbelieving, nothing is pure…»
GOSPEL OF THOMAS 14
«And whenever you go into any land… if they receive you, eat what they set before you. For what enters your mouth will not defile you; rather, what comes out of your mouth is what will defile you.»
CONCLUSION
The texts of the Old Testament and the accounts in Maccabees teach that eating pork is a sin and that dying rather than doing so is an act of faithfulness to God. However, the writings of the New Testament and other later texts teach the opposite: that no food defiles a person and that everything may be eaten.
A change in the Law, or a contradiction?
Satan’s word: ‘God made a mistake when He said ‘life for life against the murderer’. He sent me to say: ‘Do not sentence them to death, that is now a sin’. Deception builds empires, but truth silently brings them down. When you connect the dots, the picture changes. , CBA 8[473] 16 94 , 0002
│ English │ #IILHJE
PART 3 – It was not love: Sandra set a mysterious ambush for me outside IDAT (Lima, 1998) (Video language:Spanish) /20/ https://youtu.be/YgDApfn96JE,
Day 127
Slave warehouse and notebooks: they gave us wheat with weevils for lunch while we spent 16 hours a day carrying boxes. (Video language:Spanish) /27/ https://youtu.be/nphMeWzET9s
«Who is responsible for evil, ‘Satan’ or the person who commits evil?
Do not be deceived by foolish excuses, because the ‘Devil’ whom people blame for their own evil actions is, in reality, themselves.
The typical excuse of the wicked religious person: ‘I am not like this because it is not I who commits this evil, but the Devil who has possessed me and commits this evil.’
The Romans, acting as ‘Satan,’ created content that they also passed off as the laws of Moses, unjust content designed to discredit the just content. The Bible not only contains truths; it also contains falsehoods.
Satan is a flesh-and-blood being because the word means: the slanderer. The Romans slandered Paul by attributing to him the authorship of the message in Ephesians 6:12. The struggle is against flesh and blood. Numbers 35:33 mentions the death penalty against flesh and blood, the angels sent by God to Sodom destroyed flesh and blood, and not ‘spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places.’ Matthew 23:15 says that the Pharisees turn their followers into people even more corrupt than themselves, suggesting that someone can become unjust through external influence. By contrast, Daniel 12:10 says that the wicked will continue acting wickedly because it is their nature, and only the righteous will understand the way of justice. The lack of harmony between these two messages shows that some parts of the Bible contradict one another, casting doubt on its absolute truthfulness.
Isaiah 47:10 For you trusted in your wickedness, saying, No one sees me. Your wisdom and your knowledge have deceived you, and you said in your heart, I am, and there is no one besides me.
Is the Devil really an intangible being responsible for the evil actions of men, or is he merely the perfect excuse for those who refuse to take responsibility for their own actions?
Here we dismantle the oldest and most dangerous alibi in history: the invention of an abstract ‘Satan.’ It is the mechanism by which the wicked hide their own nature behind a supposed possession. Films such as The Rite perpetuate this deception; when the priest strikes the girl, the implicit message is a cry of cowardice: ‘This is not who I am; it is the Devil who possesses me.’ Make no mistake: it is not a spiritual possession, but the perversity of the wicked using fiction to evade their own responsibility.
In the case of the film The Rite, when I asked YouTube’s Gemini at what minute of the video ( https : // www . youtube . com / watch ? v = fEn9y36Oqac ) the scene appeared in which a priest strikes a girl, it replied that it could not find it. I had to locate the moment myself, and once I pointed out the exact minute where that scene occurs, Gemini gave a response that aligns with the message promoted by the film: shifting responsibility away from the aggressor onto a supposed demonic influence, portraying him as the victim of a supernatural force rather than as the person responsible for his own actions:
‘You are right, thank you for pointing out the exact minute. In the scene around 1:22:16, Father Lucas (played by Anthony Hopkins) is indeed outdoors (in the garden or courtyard outside his residence) interacting with a young girl, whom he calls Karina. At this point in the film, the atmosphere is extremely confusing and disturbing, as Father Lucas’s mental and spiritual state is under intense assault. What is seen is part of the manifestation of evil or the hallucination that Michael is witnessing; Father Lucas is acting erratically and violently, departing from his usual behavior as a disciplined exorcist. This sequence is crucial in showing how the demon is beginning to gain ground over Father Lucas, using his own confusion and despair to lead him into committing acts that contradict his faith and his mission, leaving him vulnerable to the final possession.’
We analyze how this myth, along with others, is used not only to justify atrocities, but also as a tool of social manipulation. Evil has no horns and does not come from the underworld; it has a name, a face, and above all, it makes its own decisions.
It is time to stop looking for culprits in the spiritual world and start looking at the flesh-and-blood individuals who are truly responsible.
Revelation 18:7 To the degree that she glorified herself and lived in luxury, to the same degree give her torment and sorrow; for she says in her heart, I sit as a queen, and am no widow, and shall see no sorrow.
«
«In Mark 3:29, the ‘sin against the Holy Spirit’ is warned as unforgivable. However, history and the practices of Rome reveal a shocking moral inversion: the truly unforgivable sin, according to their dogma, is questioning the credibility of their Bible. Meanwhile, serious crimes such as the killing of innocents have been ignored or justified under the same authority that claimed to be infallible. This post examines how this ‘unique sin’ was constructed and how the institution used it to protect its power while justifying historical injustices.
In purposes contrary to Christ is the Antichrist, if you read Isaiah 11 you will see the mission of Christ in his second life, and it is not to favor everyone but only the righteous, but the Antichrist is inclusive, despite being unjust, he wants to climb onto Noah’s Ark, despite being unjust he wants to leave Sodom with Lot… Happy are those to whom these words are not offensive. He who is not offended by this message, that one is righteous, congratulations to him: Christianity was created by the Romans, only a mind friendly to celibacy, proper of Greek and Roman leaders, enemies of the ancient Jews, could conceive a message like the one that says: ‘These are the ones who did not defile themselves with women, for they remained virgins. They follow the Lamb wherever he goes. They were purchased from among mankind and offered as firstfruits to God and to the Lamb’ in Revelation 14:4, or a message like this one which is similar: ‘For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like the angels of God in heaven,’ in Matthew 22:30, both messages sound as if they came from a Roman Catholic priest, and not from a prophet of God who seeks this blessing for himself: He who finds a wife finds what is good and receives favor from the Lord (Proverbs 18:22), Leviticus 21:14 A widow, or a divorced woman, or a woman who has been defiled, or a prostitute, he shall not marry; but he shall take as a wife a virgin from his own people.
I am not Christian; I am henotheist. I believe in one supreme God above all, and I believe that several created gods exist—some faithful, others deceivers. I only pray to the supreme God. But since I was indoctrinated from childhood in Roman Christianity, I believed in its teachings for many years. I applied those ideas even when common sense told me otherwise. For example—so to speak—I turned the other cheek to a woman who had already struck me on one. A woman who, at first, acted like a friend, but then, without justification, began treating me as if I were her enemy, with strange and contradictory behavior. Influenced by the Bible, I believed she had become an enemy because of some spell, and that what she needed was prayer to return to being the friend she had once shown herself to be (or pretended to be). But in the end, everything only got worse. As soon as I had the chance to dig deeper, I uncovered the lie and felt betrayed in my faith. I came to understand that many of those teachings did not come from the true message of justice, but from Roman Hellenism infiltrated into the Scriptures. And I confirmed I had been deceived. That’s why I now denounce Rome and its fraud. I do not fight against God, but against the slanders that have corrupted His message. Proverbs 29:27 declares that the righteous hates the wicked. However, 1 Peter 3:18 claims that the righteous died for the wicked. Who can believe that someone would die for those he hates? To believe it is to have blind faith; it is to accept incoherence. And when blind faith is preached, could it be because the wolf wants his prey not to see the deception?
Jehovah will shout like a mighty warrior: ‘I will take vengeance on My enemies!’
(Revelation 15:3 + Isaiah 42:13 + Deuteronomy 32:41 + Nahum 1:2–7)
And what about the so-called ‘love for the enemy’ that, according to some Bible verses, the Son of Jehovah supposedly preached—claiming we should imitate His Father’s perfection through universal love? (Mark 12:25–37, Psalm 110:1–6, Matthew 5:38–48)
That is a lie spread by the enemies of both Father and Son.
A false doctrine born from mixing Hellenism with sacred words.»
1 L’Impero Romano, Bahrain, Maometto, Gesù e l’ebraismo perseguitato. https://gabriels.work/2026/07/07/limpero-romano-bahrain-maometto-gesu-e-lebraismo-perseguitato/ 2 Je suis hénothéiste : je crois en l’existence de plusieurs dieux, mais je ne vénère que le Dieu suprême. Les objets ou êtres intermédiaires destinés à faire entendre ma prière au Dieu suprême sont superflus. https://ellameencontrara.com/2026/06/19/je-suis-henotheiste-je-crois-en-lexistence-de-plusieurs-dieux-mais-je-ne-venere-que-le-dieu-supreme-les-objets-ou-etres-intermediaires-destines-a-faire-entendre-ma-priere-au-dieu-sup/ 3 ChatGPT y Gemini opinan sobre MATH21 PAS un programa elaborado en Turbo Pascal 7 por José Carlos Galindo Hinostroza, un programador amateur, un ex programador en RPG/AS400 https://ntiend.me/2026/06/03/math21/ 4 El Cambio de la Ley https://penademuerteya.com/2026/06/05/el-cambio-de-la-ley/ 5 রোমান সাম্রাজ্যের প্রতারণার মাধ্যমে সৃষ্টি হওয়া ধর্মগুলোর বিরুদ্ধে যিশাইয়ের ভবিষ্যদ্বাণী https://purifying-the-message.blogspot.com/2026/05/blog-post_16.html
«The Parable of the Unjust Steward as a Warning About the Unfaithful Who Would Corrupt the Message.
In the parable of the unjust steward, an administrator is caught mismanaging his master’s goods, and the master tells him: ‘You can no longer be steward.’ Then the man thinks about his future and decides to alter the debts of the debtors in order to gain their favor and secure a place to live (Luke 16:1–8).
But… what if the parable concealed a deeper message? Jesus constantly spoke against the unfaithful and the corrupt.
Then an unsettling question arises: did Jesus know that, afterward, unfaithful men would alter the original message, just as the steward altered his master’s accounts?
What if the Roman councils were the reflection of that parable? What if part of what was later presented as truth about Jesus was, in reality, a modified version of his original teaching?
Because something never completely fit together.
On one hand: ‘Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for justice’ (Matthew 5:6).
On the other hand: ‘An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth’ (Exodus 21:24, Leviticus 24:20, Deuteronomy 19:21).
And also: ‘Do not resist the evil person’ and ‘love your enemies’ (Matthew 5:39–44).
Furthermore: ‘Do not think that I have come to abolish the law… but to fulfill it’ (Matthew 5:17–18).
Can you imagine that a message saying this could be coherent?: ‘Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for justice… as long as they forget about an eye for an eye and love the enemy of justice.’
Did Jesus warn, through the parable of the unjust steward, that persecuting Rome would alter his message after finding itself condemned by it?
«
«Gabriel against Zeus and the strength of his multitude.
Zeus and Gabriel were testing their strength at an arm wrestling table.
Zeus’ muscles tensed like iron columns while he smiled arrogantly.
—Show your true power… —said Zeus, challenging him with his gaze.
Gabriel tightened his arm with all his strength, but Zeus’ hand ended up slamming his down onto the table.
Zeus let out a laugh of superiority.
—Your time has already passed…
Gabriel slowly raised his eyes, responding not with anger, but with serenity.
—My time of trying to defeat you with brute force is already over.Now begins the time to defeat you with intelligence, the same intelligence with which man manages to cage creatures stronger than himself.
Zeus, you will finally understand that you are only a creature and that you cannot contain the infinite power of the God of gods.But I, sincerely recognizing His superiority over all creation, implore the strength of His power; and thus, with a strength that does not come from me, I will defeat you.
That is intelligence.
You, on the other hand, never humbled yourself before the God of gods.You asked your priests to persuade the multitude to bow before your image, and you turned that multitude into your own strength.Yes, they are more numerous than I am.
But I turn to the One who is stronger than all.And that is not you, but the God who created gods, against whom you rebelled with your demands and your arrogance.
In the end, you will remain trapped like a caged beast, and I will watch you as a man watches a beast in a zoo.Your muscles will not be able to get you out of there.
«
«The religion I defend is named justice. █
I will find her when she finds me, and she will believe what I say.
The Roman Empire has betrayed humanity by inventing religions to subjugate it. All institutionalized religions are false. All the sacred books of those religions contain frauds. However, there are messages that make sense. And there are others, missing, that can be deduced from the legitimate messages of justice. Daniel 12:1-13 — ‘The prince who fights for justice will rise to receive God’s blessing.’ Proverbs 18:22 — ‘A wife is the blessing God gives to a man.’ Leviticus 21:14 — ‘He must marry a virgin of his own faith, for she is from his own people, who will be set free when the righteous rise.’
📚 What is an institutionalized religion? An institutionalized religion is when a spiritual belief is transformed into a formal power structure, designed to control people. It ceases to be an individual search for truth or justice and becomes a system dominated by human hierarchies, serving political, economic, or social power. What is just, true, or real no longer matters. The only thing that matters is obedience. An institutionalized religion includes: Churches, synagogues, mosques, temples. Powerful religious leaders (priests, pastors, rabbis, imams, popes, etc.). Manipulated and fraudulent ‘official’ sacred texts. Dogmas that cannot be questioned. Rules imposed on people’s personal lives. Mandatory rites and rituals in order to ‘belong.’ This is how the Roman Empire, and later other empires, used faith to subjugate people. They turned the sacred into a business. And truth into heresy. If you still believe that obeying a religion is the same as having faith, you were lied to. If you still trust their books, you trust the same people who crucified justice. It’s not God speaking in his temples. It’s Rome. And Rome never stopped speaking. Wake up. He who seeks justice needs no permission. Nor an institution.
She will find me, the virgin woman will believe me.
( – – )
This is the wheat in the Bible that destroys the Roman tares in the Bible:
Revelation 19:11
Then I saw heaven opened, and there was a white horse; and the one sitting on it was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness, he judges and makes war.
Revelation 19:19
Then I saw the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies gathered together to make war against the one sitting on the horse and against his army.
Psalm 2:2-4
‘The kings of the earth set themselves up, and the rulers took counsel together against the Lord and against his anointed, saying:
‘Let us break their bonds apart and cast away their cords from us.’
He who sits in the heavens laughs; the Lord mocks them.’
Now, some basic logic: if the horseman fights for justice, but the beast and the kings of the earth fight against this horseman, then the beast and the kings of the earth are against justice. Therefore, they represent the deception of the false religions that rule with them.
The whore of Babylon, which is the false church made by Rome, has considered herself to be ‘the wife of the Lord’s anointed,’ but the false prophets of this idol-selling and flattering word-peddling organization do not share the personal goals of the Lord’s anointed and the true saints, because the ungodly leaders have chosen for themselves the path of idolatry, celibacy, or sacramentalizing unholy marriages in exchange for money. Their religious headquarters are full of idols, including false holy books, before which they bow down:
Isaiah 2:8-11
8 Their land is full of idols; they bow down to the work of their hands, to what their fingers have made.
9 So the man is humbled, and the man is brought low; do not forgive them.
10 Go into the rock, hide yourself in the dust from the terror of the LORD and from the splendor of his majesty.
11 The arrogance of human eyes will be brought low, and the pride of men will be humbled; the LORD alone will be exalted on that day.
Proverbs 19:14
House and wealth are an inheritance from fathers, but a prudent wife is from the LORD.
Leviticus 21:14
The priest of the LORD shall not marry a widow, nor a divorced woman, nor an unclean woman, nor a harlot; he shall take a virgin from his own people as a wife.
Revelation 1:6
And he has made us kings and priests to his God and Father; to him be glory and dominion forever.
1 Corinthians 11:7
The woman is the glory of man.
What does it mean in Revelation that the beast and the kings of the earth wage war on the rider of the white horse and his army?
The meaning is clear, the world leaders are hand in glove with the false prophets who are disseminators of the false religions that are dominant among the kingdoms of the earth, for obvious reasons, that includes Christianity, Islam, etc. These rulers are against justice and truth, which are the values defended by the rider of the white horse and his army loyal to God. As is evident, the deception is part of the false sacred books that these accomplices defend with the label of ‘Authorized Books of Authorized Religions’, but the only religion that I defend is justice, I defend the right of the righteous not to be deceived with religious deceptions.
Revelation 19:19 Then I saw the beast and the kings of the earth and their armies gathered together to make war against the rider on the horse and against his army.
Now some basic logic, if the horseman stands for justice, but the beast and the kings of the earth fight against this horseman, then the beast and the kings of the earth are against justice, therefore they stand for the deception of the false religions that rule with them.
This is my story:
José, a young man raised in Catholic teachings, experienced a series of events marked by complex relationships and manipulations. At 19, he began a relationship with Monica, a possessive and jealous woman. Although Jose felt that he should end the relationship, his religious upbringing led him to try to change her with love. However, Monica’s jealousy intensified, especially towards Sandra, a classmate who was making advances on Jose.
Sandra began harassing him in 1995 with anonymous phone calls, in which she made noises with the keyboard and hung up.
On one of those occasions, she revealed that she was the one calling, after Jose angrily asked in the last call: ‘Who are you?’ Sandra called him immediately, but in that call she said: ‘Jose, who am I?’ Jose, recognizing her voice, said to her: ‘You are Sandra,’ to which she replied: ‘You already know who I am.’ Jose avoided confronting her. During that time, Monica, obsessed with Sandra, threatened Jose with harming Sandra, which led Jose to protect Sandra and prolong his relationship with Monica, despite his desire to end it.
Finally, in 1996, Jose broke up with Monica and decided to approach Sandra, who had initially shown interest in him. When Jose tried to talk to her about his feelings, Sandra did not allow him to explain himself, she treated him with offensive words and he did not understand the reason. Jose chose to distance himself, but in 1997 he believed he had the opportunity to talk to Sandra, hoping that she would explain her change of attitude and be able to share the feelings that she had kept silent. On her birthday in July, he called her as he had promised a year earlier when they were still friends—something he couldn’t do in 1996 because he was with Monica. At the time, he used to believe that promises should never be broken (Matthew 5:34-37), though now he understands that some promises and oaths can be reconsidered if made in error or if the person no longer deserves them. As he finished greeting her and was about to hang up, Sandra desperately pleaded, ‘Wait, wait, can we meet?’ That made him think she had reconsidered and would finally explain her change in attitude, allowing him to share the feelings he had kept silent. However, Sandra never gave him clear answers, maintaining the intrigue with evasive and counterproductive attitudes.
Faced with this attitude, Jose decided not to look for her anymore. It was then that constant telephone harassment began. The calls followed the same pattern as in 1995 and this time were directed to the house of his paternal grandmother, where Jose lived. He was convinced that it was Sandra, since Jose had recently given Sandra his number. These calls were constant, morning, afternoon, night, and early morning, and lasted for months. When a family member answered, they did not hang up, but when José answered, the clicking of the keys could be heard before hanging up.
Jose asked his aunt, the owner of the telephone line, to request a record of incoming calls from the telephone company. He planned to use that information as evidence to contact Sandra’s family and express his concern about what she was trying to achieve with this behavior. However, his aunt downplayed his argument and refused to help. Strangely, no one in the house, neither his aunt nor his paternal grandmother, seemed to be outraged by the fact that the calls also occurred in the early morning, and they did not bother to look into how to stop them or identify the person responsible.
This had the strange appearance of orchestrated torture. Even when José asked his aunt to unplug the phone at night so he could sleep, she refused, arguing that one of her sons, who lived in Italy, could call at any moment (considering the six-hour time difference between the two countries). What made things even stranger was Monica’s fixation on Sandra, even though they hadn’t even met. Monica didn’t attend the high school where José and Sandra were enrolled, but she began to feel jealous of Sandra after finding a folder with one of José’s group projects. The folder listed the names of two women, including Sandra, but for some strange reason, Monica became fixated only on Sandra’s name.
Although José initially ignored Sandra’s phone calls, over time he relented and contacted Sandra again, influenced by biblical teachings that advised praying for those who persecuted him. However, Sandra manipulated him emotionally, alternating between insults and requests for him to keep looking for her. After months of this cycle, Jose discovered that it was all a trap. Sandra falsely accused him of sexual harassment, and as if that wasn’t bad enough, Sandra sent some criminals to beat up Jose.
That Tuesday, without José knowing it, Sandra had already set a trap for him.
Days before, José had told his friend Johan about the situation he was going through with Sandra. Johan also suspected that Sandra’s strange behavior might be due to some kind of witchcraft by Mónica. That Tuesday, José visited his old neighborhood where he had lived in 1995 and happened to run into Johan. After hearing more details about the situation, Johan recommended that José forget about Sandra and instead go out to a nightclub to meet women—perhaps he would find someone who could make him forget her. José thought it was a good idea.
So they got on a bus and headed toward the nightclub in downtown Lima. Coincidentally, the route of that bus passed near the IDAT institute. Just one block before reaching IDAT, José suddenly had the idea to get off for a moment to pay for a Saturday course he had enrolled in. He had managed to save some money for it by selling his computer and working for a week in a warehouse. However, he had been forced to quit because they exploited workers with 16-hour shifts while officially recording only 12, and if they refused to complete the week, they were threatened with not being paid at all.
So José turned to Johan and said, ‘I study here on Saturdays. Since we’re passing by, let’s get off for a bit, I’ll pay for my course, and then we’ll head to the nightclub.’
The moment José stepped off the bus, before even crossing the avenue, he was shocked to see Sandra standing right there on the corner of the institute. In disbelief, he told Johan, ‘Johan, I can’t believe it—Sandra is right there. She’s the girl I told you about, the one who acts so strangely. Wait for me here; I’m going to ask if she got the letter where I warned her about Mónica’s threats against her, and maybe she can finally explain what’s going on with her and what she wants from me with all her calls.’
Johan stayed back as José approached. But as soon as he started speaking—’Sandra, did you see the letters? Can you finally explain to me what’s going on with you?’—Sandra, without saying a word, gestured with her hand, signaling three thugs who had been hiding in different spots: one in the middle of the avenue, another behind Sandra, and another behind José.
The one standing behind Sandra stepped forward and said, ‘So you’re the sexual harasser who’s been bothering my cousin?’
José, caught off guard, responded, ‘What? Me, a harasser? On the contrary, she’s the one harassing me! If you read the letter, you’d see it’s about me trying to understand why she keeps calling me!’
Before he could react, one of the thugs grabbed him by the neck from behind and threw him to the ground. Then, together with the one who had claimed to be Sandra’s cousin, they started kicking him. Meanwhile, the third thug went through his pockets, robbing him. It was three against one—José, lying helpless on the pavement.
Luckily, his friend Johan jumped into the fight, managing to give José a chance to get up. But then the third thug picked up some rocks and started throwing them at both José and Johan.
The attack only stopped when a traffic officer intervened. The officer turned to Sandra and said, ‘If he’s harassing you, then file a complaint.’
Sandra, visibly nervous, quickly left, knowing full well that her accusation was false.
José, though deeply betrayed, did not go to the police. He had no way to prove the months of harassment he had suffered from Sandra. But beyond the shock of her betrayal, one question haunted him:
‘How did she already have this ambush set up when I never come to this place on Tuesday nights? I only come here to study on Saturday mornings.’
This made José suspect that Sandra wasn’t just an ordinary person—she might be a witch with some kind of supernatural power.
These events left a deep mark on Jose, who seeks justice and to expose those who manipulated him. In addition, he seeks to derail the advice in the Bible, such as: pray for those who insult you, because by following that advice, he fell into Sandra’s trap.
Jose’s testimony.
I am José Carlos Galindo Hinostroza, the author of the blog: https://gabriels.work
I was born in Peru, that photo is mine, it is from 1997, I was 22 years old.
At that time, I was entangled in the intrigues of Sandra Elizabeth, a former classmate from the IDAT institute. I was confused about what was happening to her (She harassed me in a very complex and extensive way to narrate in this image, but I narrate it at the bottom of this blog: and in this video:
). I did not rule out the possibility that Mónica Nieves, my ex-girlfriend, had done some witchcraft to her.
When searching for answers in the Bible, I read in Matthew 5:
‘ Pray for whoever insults you,’
And in those days, Sandra insulted me while telling me she didn’t know what was happening to her, that she wanted to continue being my friend, and that I should keep calling and looking for her again and again, and it went on like this for five months. In short, Sandra pretended to be possessed by something to keep me confused. The lies in the Bible made me believe that good people can behave evilly because of an evil spirit. That’s why the advice to pray for her didn’t seem so crazy to me—because before, Sandra pretended to be a friend, and I fell for her deception.
Thieves often use the strategy of pretending to have good intentions: To steal from stores, they pretend to be customers; to ask for tithes, they pretend to preach the word of God, but they preach that of Rome, etc., etc. Sandra Elizabeth pretended to be a friend, then pretended to be a friend in trouble looking for my help, but all to slander me and ambush me with three criminals, surely out of spite because a year earlier I rejected her advances since I was in love with Monica Nieves, to whom I was faithful. But Monica did not trust my fidelity and threatened to kill Sandra Elizabeth, which is why I broke up with Monica slowly, over eight months, so that Monica wouldn’t think it was because of Sandra. But this is how Sandra Elizabeth paid me back—with slander. She falsely accused me of sexually harassing her, and with that pretext, she ordered three criminals to beat me up—all in front of her.
I narrate all this in my blog and in my YouTube videos:
I do not wish for other righteous men to have bad experiences like I had, which is why I have created what you are reading. I know this will irritate unrighteous people like Sandra, but the truth is like the true gospel—it only favors the righteous.
The evil of José’s family overshadows Sandra’s evil:
José suffered a devastating betrayal by his own family, who not only refused to help him stop Sandra’s harassment but also falsely accused him of having a mental illness. His own relatives used these accusations as a pretext to kidnap and torture him, sending him twice to mental health institutions and a third time to a hospital.
It all began when José read Exodus 20:5 and stopped being Catholic. From that moment on, he became outraged by the Church’s dogmas and started protesting against its doctrines on his own. He also advised his relatives to stop praying to images and told them that he was praying for a friend (Sandra) who was apparently bewitched or possessed. José was under stress due to the harassment, but his relatives did not tolerate him exercising his freedom of religious expression. As a result, they destroyed his professional life, his health, and his reputation by locking him up in mental institutions where he was given sedatives.
Not only was he forcibly institutionalized, but after his release, he was forced to continue taking psychiatric medication under the threat of being locked up again. He fought to break free from those chains, and during the last two years of that injustice, with his programming career ruined, he was forced to work without pay at his uncle’s restaurant. That same uncle betrayed his trust by secretly drugging his meals with psychiatric pills. José only discovered the truth in 2007 thanks to a kitchen assistant named Lidia, who warned him about what was happening.
From 1998 to 2007, José lost nearly ten years of his youth due to his treacherous relatives. In hindsight, he realized that his mistake was defending the Bible to reject Catholicism, as his family never allowed him to read it. They committed this injustice knowing he had no financial resources to defend himself. When he finally broke free from the forced medication, he thought he had earned their respect. His maternal uncles and cousins even offered him a job, but years later, they betrayed him again with such hostility that he was forced to resign. This made him realize that he should never have forgiven them, as their bad intentions were clear.
From that moment on, he decided to study the Bible again, and in 2017, he began noticing its contradictions. Little by little, he understood why God had allowed his relatives to prevent him from defending the Bible in his youth. He discovered biblical inconsistencies and started exposing them in his blogs, where he also recounted the story of his faith and the suffering he endured at the hands of Sandra and, most of all, his own family.
For this reason, in December 2018, his mother attempted to kidnap him again with the help of corrupt police officers and a psychiatrist who issued a false certificate. They accused him of being a ‘dangerous schizophrenic’ to have him institutionalized again, but the attempt failed because he was not home. There were witnesses to the incident, and José had audio recordings, which he presented as evidence to the Peruvian authorities in his complaint, but it was dismissed.
His family knew perfectly well that he was not insane—he had a stable job, a child, and the mother of his child to take care of. However, despite knowing the truth, they attempted to kidnap him again using the same old false accusation. His own mother and other fanatical Catholic relatives led the attempt. Although his complaint was ignored by the Ministry, José exposes these truths in his blogs, making it clear that the evil of his family eclipses even that of Sandra.
Here is the evidence of the kidnappings using the slander of traitors:
‘This man is a schizophrenic who urgently needs psychiatric treatment and pills for life.’
I have been a computer programmer, I like logic, in Turbo Pascal I created a program capable of producing basic algebra formulas at random, similar to the formula below. In the following document in .PDF you can download the code of the program, this is proof that I’m not stupid, that’s why the conclusions of my research should be taken seriously. https://ntiend.me/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/math21.pdf
If I-16=30 then I=46 «Cupid is condemned to hell along with the other pagan gods (The fallen angels for their rebellion against justice, sent to eternal punishment). █
Quoting these passages does not mean defending the entire Bible. If 1 John 5:19 says that “the whole world is under the power of the evil one,” but rulers swear on the Bible, then the Devil rules with them. If the Devil rules with them, then fraud also rules with them. Therefore, the Bible contains part of that fraud, camouflaged among truths. By connecting those truths, we can expose their deceptions. Righteous people need to know these truths so that, if they have been deceived by lies added to the Bible or other similar books, they can free themselves from them.
Daniel 12:7 And I heard the man clothed in linen, who was above the waters of the river, when he raised his right hand and his left hand to heaven and swore by Him who lives forever that it shall be for a time, times, and half a time. And when the power of the holy people is completely shattered, all these things shall be finished.
Considering that ‘Devil’ means ‘Slanderer,’ it is natural to expect that the Roman persecutors, being the adversaries of the saints, later bore false witness against the saints and their messages. Thus, they themselves are the Devil, and not an intangible entity that enters and exits people, as they made us believe precisely with passages like Luke 22:3 (“Then Satan entered Judas…”), Mark 5:12-13 (the demons entering the pigs), and John 13:27 (“After the morsel, Satan entered him”).
This is my purpose: to help righteous people not waste their power believing in the lies of impostors who have adulterated the original message, which never asked anyone to kneel before anything or pray to anything that had ever been visible.
It is no coincidence that in this image, promoted by the Roman Church, Cupid appears alongside other pagan gods. They have given the names of the true saints to these false gods, but look at how these men dress and how they wear their long hair. All this goes against faithfulness to God’s laws because it is a sign of rebellion, a sign of the fallen angels (Deuteronomy 22:5).
The serpent, the devil, or Satan (the slanderer) in hell (Isaiah 66:24, Mark 9:44). Matthew 25:41: “Then he will also say to those on his left: ‘Depart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire that has been prepared for the devil and his angels’.” Hell: the eternal fire prepared for the serpent and his angels (Revelation 12:7-12), for having combined truths with heresies in the Bible, the Quran, the Torah, and for having created false forbidden gospels that they called apocryphal, to give credibility to lies in the false sacred books, all in rebellion against justice.
Book of Enoch 95:6: “Woe to you, false witnesses and to those who weigh the price of injustice, for you will perish suddenly!” Book of Enoch 95:7: “Woe to you, unjust ones who persecute the righteous, for you yourselves will be handed over and persecuted because of that injustice, and the burden of your guilt will fall upon you!” Proverbs 11:8: “The righteous is delivered from trouble, and the wicked comes in his place.” Proverbs 16:4: “The Lord has made all things for Himself, even the wicked for the day of doom.”
Book of Enoch 94:10: “Unjust ones, I say to you that He who created you will overthrow you; upon your ruin, God will have no mercy, but rather, God will rejoice in your destruction.” Satan and his angels in hell: the second death. They deserve it for lying against Christ and His faithful disciples, accusing them of being the authors of Rome’s blasphemies in the Bible, such as love for the devil (the enemy).
Isaiah 66:24: “And they shall go out and look upon the corpses of the men who have rebelled against me; for their worm shall never die, nor shall their fire be quenched, and they shall be abhorrent to all flesh.” Mark 9:44: “Where their worm does not die, and the fire is never quenched.” Revelation 20:14: “Then Death and Hades were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death: the lake of fire.”
The ‘unforgivable sin’, created by the empire that persecuted the righteous, is a shield to protect dogma. They forgive crimes but condemn doubt in them. How can one not doubt the word of the empire that, after persecuting the righteous, arrogated to itself the right to define which texts the righteous preached? Their priority is not justice; it is blind obedience to them with blind faith.
They break the will with statues, so they march submissively to others.
Word of Zeus/Satan: ‘Do you think my priests bless marriages to unite souls? No. They do it to weave nets where children who are not wanted to be begotten fall.’
Word of Satan: ‘Blessed are those who hunger and thirst to be struck on the other cheek by their enemies; it is a sign they love them and follow my teachings.’
The wolf dresses in innocence, but his instinct betrays him. Meat is the test that separates the righteous from the impostor, the sheep from the wolf in sheep’s clothing who seeks to devour flesh.
Word of Satan: ‘The king who rules is the image of God… even if his heart is the image of hell.’
The false prophet: ‘Miracles are guaranteed—unless they don’t happen, then it’s your fault for not buying enough candles.’
The false prophet: ‘God wants everyone to be saved because God loves the wicked and the righteous, but only the chosen people will be saved because God does not achieve everything He wants.’
Forced military service: The coward collects corpses and wants monuments. The brave survive without asking for applause.
A modern empire no longer needs a coliseum: it only needs propaganda, tense borders, and obedient soldiers.
«Yo prefiero abrazarme con ella, y no con la muerte.» https://depuracion-del-mensaje.blogspot.com/2026/07/yo-prefiero-abrazarme-con-ella-y-no-con.html
الإمبراطورية الرومانية، بحيرة، محمد، يسوع واليهودية المضطهدة. https://gabriels.work/2026/07/07/%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%a5%d9%85%d8%a8%d8%b1%d8%a7%d8%b7%d9%88%d8%b1%d9%8a%d8%a9-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%b1%d9%88%d9%85%d8%a7%d9%86%d9%8a%d8%a9%d8%8c-%d8%a8%d8%ad%d9%8a%d8%b1%d8%a9%d8%8c-%d9%85%d8%ad%d9%85%d8%af/
Satan’s word: ‘God made a mistake when He said ‘life for life against the murderer’. He sent me to say: ‘Do not sentence them to death, that is now a sin’. Deception builds empires, but truth silently brings them down. When you connect the dots, the picture changes.»
GABRIELS.WORK 