Excuses of wolves, dismantled by reason: “Do not criticize the minister of God,” but if that minister rapes, steals, or lies, he is not a minister of God but a minister of deception. The false prophet: ‘I know the statue is deaf, but relax—I hear perfectly when you drop coins’. The pieces fit together.
The adversary of Zeus exposes the contradiction between justice based on mutual support among the righteous and the Hellenized dogma that demands helping the unjust enemy. The false Christ of the Roman Empire (Zeus/Jupiter) says: ‘Love your enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you…’ (Matthew 5:44). Zeus adds: ‘And if you do not do so, if you do not accept me nor follow my voice…’ (Matthew 25:41). The adversary of Zeus says: ‘Depart from the gates of the righteous, Satan! Your contradiction exposes you… You preach love for enemies… yet you hate those who do not love you… You say not to curse anyone… yet you curse those who do not serve you.’ ‘The true Christ never preached love for enemies. He knew that those who claim to follow Him would falsify His words; that is why in Matthew 7:22 He warned about them… He warned about them by pointing to Psalm 139:17–22: ‘Do I not hate those who hate You, O Lord? I count them my enemies.» //71
The commandments of God were not only ten; moreover, they have omitted the most important commandment for punishing those who violate the one that says: ‘You shall not kill’—the death penalty for murderers, for which God assigned executioners. This does not mean that I support everything contained in the law attributed to Moses, for if the Roman Empire appropriated the texts of the religion it hated, I do not doubt that it altered much of the original message. Justice, the death penalty… and the mystery of the ‘Ten Commandments.’ Why were we told that there were only 10 commandments of God, including this commandment? Exodus 20:13: ‘You shall not kill.’ But excluding this other commandment: Exodus 21:14: ‘But if a man acts presumptuously against his neighbor and kills him with premeditation, you shall take him even from My altar, that he may die.’ Why, in the list of commandments, did they replace one of the commandments—the one that orders not to give honor to images, including statues—with only: ‘You shall love God above all things’? Exodus 20:5: ‘You shall not bow down to them nor honor them.’ When someone commits an atrocious crime, they oppose the death penalty for the criminal by saying that God said: ‘You shall not kill.’ Then they ask you to kneel every Sunday before their images. The Roman Empire did not desire justice; it was hostile to it and altered many of its messages in its councils. That is why the Bible also denies ‘an eye for an eye’ (Matthew 5:38–39). //77
Ayudando al pensamiento crítico a sacudirse de dogmas impuestos desde la niñez. Soy creador del blog: https://ntiend.me (https://gabriels.work).
Este blog no solo está en español y tiene como propósito respetar la inteligencia frente al dogma.
Este blog no fue creado para defender la Biblia ni para buscarle una interpretación alternativa, porque eso sería darle crédito como un bloque coherente de mensajes. Los textos allí atribuidos a los santos contienen contradicciones demasiado numerosas para etiquetarlas como simples accidentes o diferencias de interpretación. Mientras se atribuye a los santos mensajes tanto de amor como de odio hacia sus enemigos, aquí hay gato encerrado. La cuestión no es cómo interpretar la Biblia o sus enigmas, sino saber hasta dónde llegan las raíces del engaño: si los mensajes están adulterados, no tiene sentido perder el tiempo intentando descifrar enigmas bíblicos posiblemente adulterados por la mano que mató a los santos y se apoderó de sus escritos para arrogarse la autoridad moral de determinar qué escritura, original o escrita por esa mano asesina, debía considerarse “la verdad” y cuál no.
//
Helping critical thinking shake off the dogmas imposed since childhood. I am the creator of the blog: https://ntiend.me (https://gabriels.work).
This blog is not only in Spanish and is intended to respect intelligence in the face of dogma.
This blog was not created to defend the Bible or to seek an alternative interpretation of it, because that would give it credit as a coherent body of messages. The texts attributed there to the saints contain far too many contradictions to dismiss them as mere accidents or differences in interpretation. While the saints are attributed with messages expressing both love and hatred toward their enemies, there is something fishy going on here. The question is not how to interpret the Bible or its enigmas, but rather how deep the roots of the deception go: if the messages have been adulterated, there is no point wasting time trying to decipher biblical enigmas possibly adulterated by the hand that killed the saints and seized their writings in order to arrogate to itself the moral authority to determine which writing, original or written by that murderous hand, was to be considered “the truth” and which was not.
Ver todas las entradas de José Carlos Galindo Hinostroza
