The Fourth Beast and the Kingdom of Dogma… Awakening Exists Only When It Breaks a Ritual. If the Ritual Continues, There Was No Awakening. █
They tell you to awaken, to break free from the system, to stop being a zombie. They tell you that «you have already opened your eyes» and that you are now among the few who think for themselves. But if you look closely, you will discover the contradiction: the supposed messenger of freedom wears on his chest the very same symbol of the dogma he claims to fight. He is not a liberator; he is a pseudo-liberator, just another distraction of the system that keeps you on your knees.
The power of a dogma does not fear what you think while looking at a screen. It fears what you do when you turn it off. A message that makes you feel rebellious but does not change your behavior has not set you free; it has merely given you a comfortable identity from which to keep obeying. The pseudo-liberator offers you the aesthetics of critical thinking, but never mentions the specific falsehood that sustains your ritual. He speaks against authority in the abstract so that you never discover which dogma is actually programming you.
Many believe that the masses are asleep and merely waiting to be awakened by a truth. But not everyone is asleep in a way that allows them to awaken. Some love their chains because they give them order, belonging, and meaning. For them, the ritual is not a prison—it is a refuge. And the pseudo-liberator gives them exactly what they seek: an excuse to feel superior without abandoning the symbol that rules them.
That is why, when the clock strikes 6:00 PM, there is no conflict or doubt. The person looks at the time, smiles with the serenity of someone who believes they have awakened, and kneels before the same three bricks as always. The system does not fear speeches that sound critical; it fears behavior that stops feeding the ritual. If a message comforts you but does not transform your actions, it has not set you free—it has only turned you into a slave who is proud of his chains.

«And behold, this horn had eyes like the eyes of a man, and a mouth speaking great things… The fourth beast shall be a fourth kingdom upon earth, which shall be different from all other kingdoms, and shall devour the whole earth, and shall tread it down, and break it in pieces.» (Daniel 7:8, 23)

What matters to the horn is that everyone lives kneeling before the objects that accompany the spread of its dogmas. Whoever bends the body bends the will.

That horn did not rule by force alone; it grafted its dogmas into the very sacred texts themselves in order to distort the perception of truth. Its objective is not for people to understand, but for them to live on their knees before the symbols and objects that legitimize its authority.

That is why it is obsessed with manufacturing false «awakenings» and maintaining control over the narrative. Its greatest fear is that the true prophecy will be fulfilled: the one that announces its inevitable downfall at the precise moment when those who are truly asleep open their eyes and abandon the ritual.
A pastor caught in a crime is not a fallen pastor, but a wolf unmasked. Not many people know this. Those who protect themselves with shouts fear the whisper of the truth. , CAB 8[35] 7 31 , 0010
│ English │ #GLOIIQO
Where is the resurrected Lazarus if, according to the Bible, all men die only once? (Video language:Turkish) /88/ https://youtu.be/iIcVNp56haY,
Day 149
The Hand of God Against the Idols. (Video language:French) /247/ https://youtu.be/vC9W5FmWEx4
«Truth versus Dogma: The Trap of Dogma.
The word dogma comes from the Greek δόγμα (dógma), which means approximately: ‘that which has been decided,’ ‘decree,’ ‘established opinion,’ or ‘that which must be accepted.’It does not mean truth.
What is a dogma, really, and why can it become a trap for critical thinking?In this video, we reflect on the impact of dogmas on personal and social life through a story of introspection, maturity, and the search for truth beyond imposed beliefs.
When I was just over twenty years old, I found myself trapped between the manipulation of a woman… and a religious message that I believed was genuine.She would say to me: ‘I don’t know what’s wrong with me… I don’t know why I treat you so badly… Don’t stop looking for me, even if I insult you. Save me!’Meanwhile, the dogma kept telling me: ‘Pray for her. Follow our instructions. Only then can she be delivered from evil.’
Years passed before I realized that message was not the truth, but part of a dogma.And a dogma does not cease to be a dogma just because millions believe it.
Then I understood something even more important: no dogma protects the righteous.Dogmas protect the unrighteous because they convince the righteous to endure what was never their duty or their salvation… and what was never just or necessary to endure.
Today I am over fifty years old.And if I speak about my past, it is to seek justice, so that other righteous people will not be deceived by dogma as I was.
Matthew 12: The Attempt to Use Isaiah 42 as Propaganda:
Dogma tells us that Jesus performed miracles and instructed people to remain silent ‘that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by Isaiah the prophet’ (Matthew 12), that is, so that Isaiah 42 would be fulfilled in him.But Isaiah 42 does not speak only of discretion; it speaks of justice being established on the earth.
‘By means of the truth he will bring forth justice.’
‘He will not grow faint nor be discouraged until he has established justice in the earth.’
Then the question becomes inevitable:
Does justice reign on the earth?
No.
Reality refutes the dogma.Matthew 12 uses Isaiah 42 as a religious seal, but the justice that Isaiah proclaims has not been fulfilled.The text is used as propaganda, not as verified truth.
Truth versus Deception: Daniel 8:25 vs. Isaiah 42:
Daniel 8:25 describes with surgical precision how dogma operates:
‘Through his cunning he shall cause deceit to prosper in his hand; he shall magnify himself in his heart, and without warning he shall destroy many…’
Cunning, deception, silent destruction, manipulation that confuses even the righteous.That is the mechanism of dogma: it prospers through deception, not through truth.
In contrast, Isaiah 42 describes how truth operates:
‘By means of the truth he will bring forth justice.’
Truth brings justice, establishes it, upholds it, and defends it.Truth sets the righteous free from the deception denounced in Daniel 8:25.
Isaiah 42 has not been fulfilled; Daniel 8:25 has.Reality is on the side of the warning, not of the dogma.
Selective Justice:
Daniel 12:1: ‘At that time Michael, the great prince, shall stand up… There shall be a time of distress such as never has been… but at that time your people shall be delivered, everyone who is found written in the book.’
John 8:32: ‘And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.’
Proverbs 11:8: ‘The righteous is delivered out of trouble, and the wicked comes in his place.’
Psalm 118:20: ‘This is the gate of Jehovah; the righteous shall enter through it.’
These four passages form a selective message addressed only to the righteous, yet the Roman framework contradicts it by teaching that ‘Christ died for sinners’ (Romans 5:8), that ‘all have sinned and all are justified’ (Romans 3:23–24), that ‘God desires all people to be saved’ (1 Timothy 2:4), that the unrighteous should be forgiven (Luke 23:34), and that even the enemies of the righteous should be loved (Matthew 5:44; Proverbs 29:27; Genesis 3:15). Thus, the universalism and Hellenism introduced by Rome erase the distinction between the righteous person who may sin through deception and the unrighteous person who sins by nature, destroying the righteous message in which only the righteous are delivered, purified, protected, and admitted through the gate.
It would be unwise to assume that this infiltration affects only the books attributed to Jesus or to the saints persecuted by the Roman Empire, and not the older writings.
«
«In Mark 3:29, the ‘sin against the Holy Spirit’ is warned as unforgivable. However, history and the practices of Rome reveal a shocking moral inversion: the truly unforgivable sin, according to their dogma, is questioning the credibility of their Bible. Meanwhile, serious crimes such as the killing of innocents have been ignored or justified under the same authority that claimed to be infallible. This post examines how this ‘unique sin’ was constructed and how the institution used it to protect its power while justifying historical injustices.
In purposes contrary to Christ is the Antichrist, if you read Isaiah 11 you will see the mission of Christ in his second life, and it is not to favor everyone but only the righteous, but the Antichrist is inclusive, despite being unjust, he wants to climb onto Noah’s Ark, despite being unjust he wants to leave Sodom with Lot… Happy are those to whom these words are not offensive. He who is not offended by this message, that one is righteous, congratulations to him: Christianity was created by the Romans, only a mind friendly to celibacy, proper of Greek and Roman leaders, enemies of the ancient Jews, could conceive a message like the one that says: ‘These are the ones who did not defile themselves with women, for they remained virgins. They follow the Lamb wherever he goes. They were purchased from among mankind and offered as firstfruits to God and to the Lamb’ in Revelation 14:4, or a message like this one which is similar: ‘For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like the angels of God in heaven,’ in Matthew 22:30, both messages sound as if they came from a Roman Catholic priest, and not from a prophet of God who seeks this blessing for himself: He who finds a wife finds what is good and receives favor from the Lord (Proverbs 18:22), Leviticus 21:14 A widow, or a divorced woman, or a woman who has been defiled, or a prostitute, he shall not marry; but he shall take as a wife a virgin from his own people.
I am not Christian; I am henotheist. I believe in one supreme God above all, and I believe that several created gods exist—some faithful, others deceivers. I only pray to the supreme God. But since I was indoctrinated from childhood in Roman Christianity, I believed in its teachings for many years. I applied those ideas even when common sense told me otherwise. For example—so to speak—I turned the other cheek to a woman who had already struck me on one. A woman who, at first, acted like a friend, but then, without justification, began treating me as if I were her enemy, with strange and contradictory behavior. Influenced by the Bible, I believed she had become an enemy because of some spell, and that what she needed was prayer to return to being the friend she had once shown herself to be (or pretended to be). But in the end, everything only got worse. As soon as I had the chance to dig deeper, I uncovered the lie and felt betrayed in my faith. I came to understand that many of those teachings did not come from the true message of justice, but from Roman Hellenism infiltrated into the Scriptures. And I confirmed I had been deceived. That’s why I now denounce Rome and its fraud. I do not fight against God, but against the slanders that have corrupted His message. Proverbs 29:27 declares that the righteous hates the wicked. However, 1 Peter 3:18 claims that the righteous died for the wicked. Who can believe that someone would die for those he hates? To believe it is to have blind faith; it is to accept incoherence. And when blind faith is preached, could it be because the wolf wants his prey not to see the deception?
Jehovah will shout like a mighty warrior: ‘I will take vengeance on My enemies!’
(Revelation 15:3 + Isaiah 42:13 + Deuteronomy 32:41 + Nahum 1:2–7)
And what about the so-called ‘love for the enemy’ that, according to some Bible verses, the Son of Jehovah supposedly preached—claiming we should imitate His Father’s perfection through universal love? (Mark 12:25–37, Psalm 110:1–6, Matthew 5:38–48)
That is a lie spread by the enemies of both Father and Son.
A false doctrine born from mixing Hellenism with sacred words.»

1 Ο Ιακώβ εξαπάτησε έναν τυφλό άνθρωπο… και ο Θεός τον αγάπησε; https://purifying-the-message.blogspot.com/2026/05/blog-post_10.html 2 Porque te confiaste en tu maldad, diciendo: Nadie me ve. Tu sabiduría y tu misma ciencia te engañaron, y dijiste en tu corazón: Yo, y no más. https://144k.xyz/2026/07/09/porque-te-confiaste-en-tu-maldad-diciendo-nadie-me-ve-tu-sabiduria-y-tu-misma-ciencia-te-enganaron-y-dijiste-en-tu-corazon-yo-y-no-mas/ 3 Das Geheimnis von 1998 und Mein Zeugnis | APOKALYPSE: DIE BÜCHER WERDEN GEÖFFNET https://gabriels.work/2026/06/22/das-geheimnis-von-1998-und-mein-zeugnis-apokalypse-die-bucher-werden-geoffnet/ 4 S’il était vrai que nous sommes tous enfants de Dieu et, par conséquent, égaux devant Lui, alors comment peut-on expliquer ceci ? https://ellameencontrara.com/2026/06/03/sil-etait-vrai-que-nous-sommes-tous-enfants-de-dieu-et-par-consequent-egaux-devant-lui-alors-comment-peut-on-expliquer-ceci/ 5 Mis palabras contra el servicio militar obligatorio. https://penademuerteya.com/2026/03/31/mis-palabras-contra-el-servicio-militar-obligatorio/

«Sandra and the Voice of the Devil.
It all began in October 1996. We had just finished working on a group assignment at the house of a mutual friend. I was in love with her and, during the entire walk back, I tried to find the right moment to honestly tell her how I felt.
Instead of a conversation, however, I was met with unexpected hostility: she began treating me badly and insulting me for no logical reason.
The critical moment came when we reached the bus stop we both used in Zárate, San Juan de Lurigancho, on Malecón Checa Avenue. She remained cold and offensive, and I, confused and discouraged by her radical change in behavior, was about to leave. She bluntly said, ‘There’s your bus. Get on it and leave.’ I hesitated. I still wanted to understand what was happening to her, suspecting that her erratic behavior might have been caused by something external, such as witchcraft. I stayed, waiting for an answer.
As soon as the bus drove away, the darkness of Malecón Checa filled with a real threat: about sixteen men who looked like criminals emerged from the banks of the Rímac River and walked straight toward us. I was terrified, trembling, yet I stepped in front of her, trying to protect her at all costs. At that moment of greatest danger, I heard the impossible: her mouth—the mouth of a woman I knew well—produced a deep, firm male voice, saying, ‘I’m not afraid. I’m not afraid.’
When the men walked past us, I turned toward her, expecting to see relief or gratitude. I found nothing: not a word of thanks, nor the slightest sign of the terror that I myself was feeling. She simply stood there like a statue before boarding her own bus and leaving me behind, completely ignoring me.
Nine months later, after getting back in touch with her, she asked me to meet her to study. On one occasion, at the institute where we had met, when I finally tried to confront her by asking, ‘Why did you treat me that way in 1996?’ her tone suddenly changed. She began speaking like a little girl, shouting, ‘Catch me if you can! Catch me if you can!’ as she ran laughing out of the classroom.
I followed her upstairs until she reached a dead-end hallway. When I caught up with her, I found her leaning against the wall, sweating and trembling violently, without saying a word and appearing absolutely terrified. Stunned by what I was seeing, I decided to walk away, but she kept calling me over and over again, asking me by phone to keep looking for her.
Confused by the Catholic dogmas with which I had been indoctrinated since childhood, I could not understand that she was not a victim of demonic possession in need of my love or my prayers to be set free, but rather a cruel woman who used a cynical method to control me: for months she kept asking me to look for her again and again only to insult me, reject me, and eventually ambush me with criminals.




Recently I came across a YouTube video with the code h77tDW4tMy4, in which the Venezuelan Catholic priest Luis Toro spoke about sin, confession, witchcraft, demonic possessions, and exorcisms. I then left the following comment under my username @JoseGalindoMMXXVI:
This discourse about ‘possessions’ and ‘spiritual warfare’ is the most dangerous excuse for covering up the wickedness of certain people. My personal experience proved to me that what you call ‘demonic possession’ is actually a mechanism of manipulation carried out by flesh-and-blood human beings. In my youth, I met a woman who used personality changes, fake voices, and erratic behavior to manipulate me. While she pretended to be ‘possessed’ in order to force me to stay focused on her, behind my back she slandered me with false accusations of sexual harassment, and under that pretext she ultimately had me beaten. She was not possessed; she was exercising wickedness through her own face and her own decisions, using fiction to evade responsibility and destroy me. I learned the hard way that the real ‘possession’ is becoming trapped in dogmas that make you waste your time believing that the wicked can become righteous through prayer, or that their evil comes from some external entity. I was an ignorant man who believed in the false doctrine of ‘loving your enemy’ that Hellenism introduced into the Bible; that dogma does not fit either the Law or the prophecies, and it only serves to allow the righteous to be manipulated by the wicked. I came to understand that if the words of Jesus were adulterated by Rome, it is hardly surprising that the Law and the Prophets were also tampered with by the same Empire in order to confuse mankind. Sin does not need the ears of a gossip who calls himself ‘father.’ The real confession that God truly forgives is the sincere confession of the righteous before the victim they have wronged, not before a third party who has nothing to do with the matter. And to confess my sins against God, I need no intermediary before One who hears even our thoughts. Meanwhile, you teach people to pray the ‘Hail Mary,’ kneeling before images—which is idolatry—and declaring themselves in that very prayer to a created being, rather than to God, to be sinners until the hour of their death: ‘we sinners, now and at the hour of our death,’ thereby ensuring that they remain recurring sinners. That is not turning away from sin; it does not fulfill the requirement for receiving God’s forgiveness: Proverbs 28:13: ‘Whoever conceals his sins will not prosper, but whoever confesses and forsakes them will obtain mercy.’ That false confession is a diabolical deception created by the Empire and its false conversion. That is what it means to be ‘possessed’: to live under the deception of dogmas that keep you enslaved to error.

The wicked commit evil because they are wicked, not because they have been possessed by anything. The righteous become corrupted when they are ‘possessed by the Devil,’ which, if we wish to use that term, means being deceived by the dogmas imposed by the Roman Empire after it erased almost everything of the righteous message it had always rejected, just as Daniel 12:10 says: ‘Many shall be purified, made white, and refined, but the wicked shall act wickedly; and none of the wicked shall understand, but those who are wise shall understand.’ The empire of the wicked remained what it had always been, even though it replaced Caesars with popes. Its coins bearing the faces of its leaders continue to be minted; the images of its ancient gods—the Sun, Mars, Minerva, and Jupiter—continue to be worshipped, albeit under different labels; and God’s righteous law of justified eye for eye continues to be challenged by Rome through the doctrine of offering the other eye or the other cheek. It is curious to hear someone who presents himself as an ‘exorcist’ denounce witchcraft when the Catholic Church operates through exactly the same methods of control. Let us examine the equivalence: the witch doctor sells you an amulet for your ‘protection,’ and the Church hangs a rosary around your neck with the very same empty promise. The witch doctor offers you a cleansing bath for good luck, while the priest sprinkles you with ‘holy water’ under the same superstitious logic. Even in their very foundations, both share the same obsession: the witch doctor uses skulls on his altars, and the Church builds its temples over catacombs and the bones of the dead; in fact, it displays skulls at the base of its crosses before which people kneel, perpetuating a cult of death that has nothing to do with justice. Both the witch doctor and the priest need you to remain ignorant. Why? Because water only cleans the body; it does not remove the ignorance that keeps people enslaved. What frees the righteous from ‘possession’—which is nothing more than deception by imperial dogmas—is knowledge, not a magical ritual. The Church only stopped persecuting witch doctors when they became useful to the system and adopted the same iconography. There is no white magic versus black magic; they are simply two sides of the same coin. Black magic is merely the black dots on a white die called ‘white magic’: both need each other, both are the same mechanism of control designed to keep the people kneeling before images and objects. Idols and amulets are sold, false blessings have a price, but God does not sell His blessings, nor does He need merchants of the true faith.



«
«Satan Knows… The Serpent Is Not at the Top of the Food Chain.
Revelation 12:9: ‘And the great dragon was cast out, that ancient serpent called the Devil and Satan, who deceives the whole world. He was cast down to the earth, and his angels were cast down with him.’
Verse 10: ‘Then I heard a loud voice in heaven, saying: ‘Now have come the salvation, the power, the kingdom of our God, and the authority of His Christ, because the accuser of our brothers has been cast down, the one who accused them before our God day and night…»
How did he accuse them? By bearing false witness against the saints. For example: ‘Moses said this, Ezekiel said this, Peter said this, Paul said this, Jesus said this,’ when in reality those messages do not serve justice at all, even though they appear in books that the world considers sacred because they are official.
How did he deceive the world? Through those false testimonies: corrupted sacred books, adulterated Gospels, adulterated laws, adulterated prophecies, and dominant yet false religions built upon those corrupted texts.
How wonderful it is to view those lies from another angle and recognize that they are lies rather than the truth! How wonderful it is to have an ‘eagle’s-eye view’ that allows us to recognize them!
Daniel 12:1: ‘At that time Michael, the great prince, shall arise… There shall be a time of distress such as never has been… but at that time your people shall be delivered, everyone whose name shall be found written in the book.’
John 8:32: ‘And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.’
Proverbs 11:8: ‘The righteous is delivered from trouble, and the wicked receives it instead.’
Psalm 118:20: ‘This is the gate of the LORD; the righteous shall enter through it.’
These four passages form a selective message directed only to the righteous. However, the Roman framework contradicts this by teaching that ‘Christ died for sinners’ (Romans 5:8), that ‘all have sinned and all are justified’ (Romans 3:23–24), that ‘God desires all people to be saved’ (1 Timothy 2:4), that the unrighteous should be forgiven (Luke 23:34), and that even the enemies of the righteous should be loved (Matthew 5:44, Proverbs 29:27, Genesis 3:15). Thus, the universalism and Hellenism infiltrated by Rome erase the distinction between the righteous person, who may sin through deception, and the unrighteous person, who sins by nature, thereby destroying the righteous message in which only the righteous are delivered, purified, protected, and admitted through the gate.
It would be unreasonable to assume that this infiltration affected only the books attributed to Jesus or to the saints persecuted by the Roman Empire, while leaving the older writings untouched.

«
«The religion I defend is named justice. █
I will find her when she finds me, and she will believe what I say.
The Roman Empire has betrayed humanity by inventing religions to subjugate it. All institutionalized religions are false. All the sacred books of those religions contain frauds. However, there are messages that make sense. And there are others, missing, that can be deduced from the legitimate messages of justice. Daniel 12:1-13 — ‘The prince who fights for justice will rise to receive God’s blessing.’ Proverbs 18:22 — ‘A wife is the blessing God gives to a man.’ Leviticus 21:14 — ‘He must marry a virgin of his own faith, for she is from his own people, who will be set free when the righteous rise.’
📚 What is an institutionalized religion? An institutionalized religion is when a spiritual belief is transformed into a formal power structure, designed to control people. It ceases to be an individual search for truth or justice and becomes a system dominated by human hierarchies, serving political, economic, or social power. What is just, true, or real no longer matters. The only thing that matters is obedience. An institutionalized religion includes: Churches, synagogues, mosques, temples. Powerful religious leaders (priests, pastors, rabbis, imams, popes, etc.). Manipulated and fraudulent ‘official’ sacred texts. Dogmas that cannot be questioned. Rules imposed on people’s personal lives. Mandatory rites and rituals in order to ‘belong.’ This is how the Roman Empire, and later other empires, used faith to subjugate people. They turned the sacred into a business. And truth into heresy. If you still believe that obeying a religion is the same as having faith, you were lied to. If you still trust their books, you trust the same people who crucified justice. It’s not God speaking in his temples. It’s Rome. And Rome never stopped speaking. Wake up. He who seeks justice needs no permission. Nor an institution.
She will find me, the virgin woman will believe me.
( – – )
This is the wheat in the Bible that destroys the Roman tares in the Bible:
Revelation 19:11
Then I saw heaven opened, and there was a white horse; and the one sitting on it was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness, he judges and makes war.
Revelation 19:19
Then I saw the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies gathered together to make war against the one sitting on the horse and against his army.
Psalm 2:2-4
‘The kings of the earth set themselves up, and the rulers took counsel together against the Lord and against his anointed, saying:
‘Let us break their bonds apart and cast away their cords from us.’
He who sits in the heavens laughs; the Lord mocks them.’
Now, some basic logic: if the horseman fights for justice, but the beast and the kings of the earth fight against this horseman, then the beast and the kings of the earth are against justice. Therefore, they represent the deception of the false religions that rule with them.
The whore of Babylon, which is the false church made by Rome, has considered herself to be ‘the wife of the Lord’s anointed,’ but the false prophets of this idol-selling and flattering word-peddling organization do not share the personal goals of the Lord’s anointed and the true saints, because the ungodly leaders have chosen for themselves the path of idolatry, celibacy, or sacramentalizing unholy marriages in exchange for money. Their religious headquarters are full of idols, including false holy books, before which they bow down:
Isaiah 2:8-11
8 Their land is full of idols; they bow down to the work of their hands, to what their fingers have made.
9 So the man is humbled, and the man is brought low; do not forgive them.
10 Go into the rock, hide yourself in the dust from the terror of the LORD and from the splendor of his majesty.
11 The arrogance of human eyes will be brought low, and the pride of men will be humbled; the LORD alone will be exalted on that day.
Proverbs 19:14
House and wealth are an inheritance from fathers, but a prudent wife is from the LORD.
Leviticus 21:14
The priest of the LORD shall not marry a widow, nor a divorced woman, nor an unclean woman, nor a harlot; he shall take a virgin from his own people as a wife.
Revelation 1:6
And he has made us kings and priests to his God and Father; to him be glory and dominion forever.
1 Corinthians 11:7
The woman is the glory of man.
What does it mean in Revelation that the beast and the kings of the earth wage war on the rider of the white horse and his army?
The meaning is clear, the world leaders are hand in glove with the false prophets who are disseminators of the false religions that are dominant among the kingdoms of the earth, for obvious reasons, that includes Christianity, Islam, etc. These rulers are against justice and truth, which are the values defended by the rider of the white horse and his army loyal to God. As is evident, the deception is part of the false sacred books that these accomplices defend with the label of ‘Authorized Books of Authorized Religions’, but the only religion that I defend is justice, I defend the right of the righteous not to be deceived with religious deceptions.
Revelation 19:19 Then I saw the beast and the kings of the earth and their armies gathered together to make war against the rider on the horse and against his army.
Now some basic logic, if the horseman stands for justice, but the beast and the kings of the earth fight against this horseman, then the beast and the kings of the earth are against justice, therefore they stand for the deception of the false religions that rule with them.
This is my story:
José, a young man raised in Catholic teachings, experienced a series of events marked by complex relationships and manipulations. At 19, he began a relationship with Monica, a possessive and jealous woman. Although Jose felt that he should end the relationship, his religious upbringing led him to try to change her with love. However, Monica’s jealousy intensified, especially towards Sandra, a classmate who was making advances on Jose.
Sandra began harassing him in 1995 with anonymous phone calls, in which she made noises with the keyboard and hung up.
On one of those occasions, she revealed that she was the one calling, after Jose angrily asked in the last call: ‘Who are you?’ Sandra called him immediately, but in that call she said: ‘Jose, who am I?’ Jose, recognizing her voice, said to her: ‘You are Sandra,’ to which she replied: ‘You already know who I am.’ Jose avoided confronting her. During that time, Monica, obsessed with Sandra, threatened Jose with harming Sandra, which led Jose to protect Sandra and prolong his relationship with Monica, despite his desire to end it.
Finally, in 1996, Jose broke up with Monica and decided to approach Sandra, who had initially shown interest in him. When Jose tried to talk to her about his feelings, Sandra did not allow him to explain himself, she treated him with offensive words and he did not understand the reason. Jose chose to distance himself, but in 1997 he believed he had the opportunity to talk to Sandra, hoping that she would explain her change of attitude and be able to share the feelings that she had kept silent. On her birthday in July, he called her as he had promised a year earlier when they were still friends—something he couldn’t do in 1996 because he was with Monica. At the time, he used to believe that promises should never be broken (Matthew 5:34-37), though now he understands that some promises and oaths can be reconsidered if made in error or if the person no longer deserves them. As he finished greeting her and was about to hang up, Sandra desperately pleaded, ‘Wait, wait, can we meet?’ That made him think she had reconsidered and would finally explain her change in attitude, allowing him to share the feelings he had kept silent. However, Sandra never gave him clear answers, maintaining the intrigue with evasive and counterproductive attitudes.
Faced with this attitude, Jose decided not to look for her anymore. It was then that constant telephone harassment began. The calls followed the same pattern as in 1995 and this time were directed to the house of his paternal grandmother, where Jose lived. He was convinced that it was Sandra, since Jose had recently given Sandra his number. These calls were constant, morning, afternoon, night, and early morning, and lasted for months. When a family member answered, they did not hang up, but when José answered, the clicking of the keys could be heard before hanging up.
Jose asked his aunt, the owner of the telephone line, to request a record of incoming calls from the telephone company. He planned to use that information as evidence to contact Sandra’s family and express his concern about what she was trying to achieve with this behavior. However, his aunt downplayed his argument and refused to help. Strangely, no one in the house, neither his aunt nor his paternal grandmother, seemed to be outraged by the fact that the calls also occurred in the early morning, and they did not bother to look into how to stop them or identify the person responsible.
This had the strange appearance of orchestrated torture. Even when José asked his aunt to unplug the phone at night so he could sleep, she refused, arguing that one of her sons, who lived in Italy, could call at any moment (considering the six-hour time difference between the two countries). What made things even stranger was Monica’s fixation on Sandra, even though they hadn’t even met. Monica didn’t attend the high school where José and Sandra were enrolled, but she began to feel jealous of Sandra after finding a folder with one of José’s group projects. The folder listed the names of two women, including Sandra, but for some strange reason, Monica became fixated only on Sandra’s name.
Although José initially ignored Sandra’s phone calls, over time he relented and contacted Sandra again, influenced by biblical teachings that advised praying for those who persecuted him. However, Sandra manipulated him emotionally, alternating between insults and requests for him to keep looking for her. After months of this cycle, Jose discovered that it was all a trap. Sandra falsely accused him of sexual harassment, and as if that wasn’t bad enough, Sandra sent some criminals to beat up Jose.
That Tuesday, without José knowing it, Sandra had already set a trap for him.
Days before, José had told his friend Johan about the situation he was going through with Sandra. Johan also suspected that Sandra’s strange behavior might be due to some kind of witchcraft by Mónica. That Tuesday, José visited his old neighborhood where he had lived in 1995 and happened to run into Johan. After hearing more details about the situation, Johan recommended that José forget about Sandra and instead go out to a nightclub to meet women—perhaps he would find someone who could make him forget her. José thought it was a good idea.
So they got on a bus and headed toward the nightclub in downtown Lima. Coincidentally, the route of that bus passed near the IDAT institute. Just one block before reaching IDAT, José suddenly had the idea to get off for a moment to pay for a Saturday course he had enrolled in. He had managed to save some money for it by selling his computer and working for a week in a warehouse. However, he had been forced to quit because they exploited workers with 16-hour shifts while officially recording only 12, and if they refused to complete the week, they were threatened with not being paid at all.
So José turned to Johan and said, ‘I study here on Saturdays. Since we’re passing by, let’s get off for a bit, I’ll pay for my course, and then we’ll head to the nightclub.’
The moment José stepped off the bus, before even crossing the avenue, he was shocked to see Sandra standing right there on the corner of the institute. In disbelief, he told Johan, ‘Johan, I can’t believe it—Sandra is right there. She’s the girl I told you about, the one who acts so strangely. Wait for me here; I’m going to ask if she got the letter where I warned her about Mónica’s threats against her, and maybe she can finally explain what’s going on with her and what she wants from me with all her calls.’
Johan stayed back as José approached. But as soon as he started speaking—’Sandra, did you see the letters? Can you finally explain to me what’s going on with you?’—Sandra, without saying a word, gestured with her hand, signaling three thugs who had been hiding in different spots: one in the middle of the avenue, another behind Sandra, and another behind José.
The one standing behind Sandra stepped forward and said, ‘So you’re the sexual harasser who’s been bothering my cousin?’
José, caught off guard, responded, ‘What? Me, a harasser? On the contrary, she’s the one harassing me! If you read the letter, you’d see it’s about me trying to understand why she keeps calling me!’
Before he could react, one of the thugs grabbed him by the neck from behind and threw him to the ground. Then, together with the one who had claimed to be Sandra’s cousin, they started kicking him. Meanwhile, the third thug went through his pockets, robbing him. It was three against one—José, lying helpless on the pavement.
Luckily, his friend Johan jumped into the fight, managing to give José a chance to get up. But then the third thug picked up some rocks and started throwing them at both José and Johan.
The attack only stopped when a traffic officer intervened. The officer turned to Sandra and said, ‘If he’s harassing you, then file a complaint.’
Sandra, visibly nervous, quickly left, knowing full well that her accusation was false.
José, though deeply betrayed, did not go to the police. He had no way to prove the months of harassment he had suffered from Sandra. But beyond the shock of her betrayal, one question haunted him:
‘How did she already have this ambush set up when I never come to this place on Tuesday nights? I only come here to study on Saturday mornings.’
This made José suspect that Sandra wasn’t just an ordinary person—she might be a witch with some kind of supernatural power.
These events left a deep mark on Jose, who seeks justice and to expose those who manipulated him. In addition, he seeks to derail the advice in the Bible, such as: pray for those who insult you, because by following that advice, he fell into Sandra’s trap.
Jose’s testimony.
I am José Carlos Galindo Hinostroza, the author of the blog: https://gabriels.work
I was born in Peru, that photo is mine, it is from 1997, I was 22 years old.

At that time, I was entangled in the intrigues of Sandra Elizabeth, a former classmate from the IDAT institute. I was confused about what was happening to her (She harassed me in a very complex and extensive way to narrate in this image, but I narrate it at the bottom of this blog: and in this video:
). I did not rule out the possibility that Mónica Nieves, my ex-girlfriend, had done some witchcraft to her.
When searching for answers in the Bible, I read in Matthew 5:
‘ Pray for whoever insults you,’
And in those days, Sandra insulted me while telling me she didn’t know what was happening to her, that she wanted to continue being my friend, and that I should keep calling and looking for her again and again, and it went on like this for five months. In short, Sandra pretended to be possessed by something to keep me confused. The lies in the Bible made me believe that good people can behave evilly because of an evil spirit. That’s why the advice to pray for her didn’t seem so crazy to me—because before, Sandra pretended to be a friend, and I fell for her deception.
Thieves often use the strategy of pretending to have good intentions: To steal from stores, they pretend to be customers; to ask for tithes, they pretend to preach the word of God, but they preach that of Rome, etc., etc. Sandra Elizabeth pretended to be a friend, then pretended to be a friend in trouble looking for my help, but all to slander me and ambush me with three criminals, surely out of spite because a year earlier I rejected her advances since I was in love with Monica Nieves, to whom I was faithful. But Monica did not trust my fidelity and threatened to kill Sandra Elizabeth, which is why I broke up with Monica slowly, over eight months, so that Monica wouldn’t think it was because of Sandra. But this is how Sandra Elizabeth paid me back—with slander. She falsely accused me of sexually harassing her, and with that pretext, she ordered three criminals to beat me up—all in front of her.
I narrate all this in my blog and in my YouTube videos:
I do not wish for other righteous men to have bad experiences like I had, which is why I have created what you are reading. I know this will irritate unrighteous people like Sandra, but the truth is like the true gospel—it only favors the righteous.
The evil of José’s family overshadows Sandra’s evil:
José suffered a devastating betrayal by his own family, who not only refused to help him stop Sandra’s harassment but also falsely accused him of having a mental illness. His own relatives used these accusations as a pretext to kidnap and torture him, sending him twice to mental health institutions and a third time to a hospital.
It all began when José read Exodus 20:5 and stopped being Catholic. From that moment on, he became outraged by the Church’s dogmas and started protesting against its doctrines on his own. He also advised his relatives to stop praying to images and told them that he was praying for a friend (Sandra) who was apparently bewitched or possessed. José was under stress due to the harassment, but his relatives did not tolerate him exercising his freedom of religious expression. As a result, they destroyed his professional life, his health, and his reputation by locking him up in mental institutions where he was given sedatives.
Not only was he forcibly institutionalized, but after his release, he was forced to continue taking psychiatric medication under the threat of being locked up again. He fought to break free from those chains, and during the last two years of that injustice, with his programming career ruined, he was forced to work without pay at his uncle’s restaurant. That same uncle betrayed his trust by secretly drugging his meals with psychiatric pills. José only discovered the truth in 2007 thanks to a kitchen assistant named Lidia, who warned him about what was happening.
From 1998 to 2007, José lost nearly ten years of his youth due to his treacherous relatives. In hindsight, he realized that his mistake was defending the Bible to reject Catholicism, as his family never allowed him to read it. They committed this injustice knowing he had no financial resources to defend himself. When he finally broke free from the forced medication, he thought he had earned their respect. His maternal uncles and cousins even offered him a job, but years later, they betrayed him again with such hostility that he was forced to resign. This made him realize that he should never have forgiven them, as their bad intentions were clear.
From that moment on, he decided to study the Bible again, and in 2017, he began noticing its contradictions. Little by little, he understood why God had allowed his relatives to prevent him from defending the Bible in his youth. He discovered biblical inconsistencies and started exposing them in his blogs, where he also recounted the story of his faith and the suffering he endured at the hands of Sandra and, most of all, his own family.
For this reason, in December 2018, his mother attempted to kidnap him again with the help of corrupt police officers and a psychiatrist who issued a false certificate. They accused him of being a ‘dangerous schizophrenic’ to have him institutionalized again, but the attempt failed because he was not home. There were witnesses to the incident, and José had audio recordings, which he presented as evidence to the Peruvian authorities in his complaint, but it was dismissed.
His family knew perfectly well that he was not insane—he had a stable job, a child, and the mother of his child to take care of. However, despite knowing the truth, they attempted to kidnap him again using the same old false accusation. His own mother and other fanatical Catholic relatives led the attempt. Although his complaint was ignored by the Ministry, José exposes these truths in his blogs, making it clear that the evil of his family eclipses even that of Sandra.
Here is the evidence of the kidnappings using the slander of traitors:
‘This man is a schizophrenic who urgently needs psychiatric treatment and pills for life.’







I have been a computer programmer, I like logic, in Turbo Pascal I created a program capable of producing basic algebra formulas at random, similar to the formula below. In the following document in .PDF you can download the code of the program, this is proof that I’m not stupid, that’s why the conclusions of my research should be taken seriously. https://ntiend.me/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/math21.pdf
If U*22=721 then U=32.772 «Cupid is condemned to hell along with the other pagan gods (The fallen angels for their rebellion against justice, sent to eternal punishment). █
Quoting these passages does not mean defending the entire Bible. If 1 John 5:19 says that “the whole world is under the power of the evil one,” but rulers swear on the Bible, then the Devil rules with them. If the Devil rules with them, then fraud also rules with them. Therefore, the Bible contains part of that fraud, camouflaged among truths. By connecting those truths, we can expose their deceptions. Righteous people need to know these truths so that, if they have been deceived by lies added to the Bible or other similar books, they can free themselves from them.
Daniel 12:7 And I heard the man clothed in linen, who was above the waters of the river, when he raised his right hand and his left hand to heaven and swore by Him who lives forever that it shall be for a time, times, and half a time. And when the power of the holy people is completely shattered, all these things shall be finished.
Considering that ‘Devil’ means ‘Slanderer,’ it is natural to expect that the Roman persecutors, being the adversaries of the saints, later bore false witness against the saints and their messages. Thus, they themselves are the Devil, and not an intangible entity that enters and exits people, as they made us believe precisely with passages like Luke 22:3 (“Then Satan entered Judas…”), Mark 5:12-13 (the demons entering the pigs), and John 13:27 (“After the morsel, Satan entered him”).
This is my purpose: to help righteous people not waste their power believing in the lies of impostors who have adulterated the original message, which never asked anyone to kneel before anything or pray to anything that had ever been visible.
It is no coincidence that in this image, promoted by the Roman Church, Cupid appears alongside other pagan gods. They have given the names of the true saints to these false gods, but look at how these men dress and how they wear their long hair. All this goes against faithfulness to God’s laws because it is a sign of rebellion, a sign of the fallen angels (Deuteronomy 22:5).
The serpent, the devil, or Satan (the slanderer) in hell (Isaiah 66:24, Mark 9:44). Matthew 25:41: “Then he will also say to those on his left: ‘Depart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire that has been prepared for the devil and his angels’.” Hell: the eternal fire prepared for the serpent and his angels (Revelation 12:7-12), for having combined truths with heresies in the Bible, the Quran, the Torah, and for having created false forbidden gospels that they called apocryphal, to give credibility to lies in the false sacred books, all in rebellion against justice.
Book of Enoch 95:6: “Woe to you, false witnesses and to those who weigh the price of injustice, for you will perish suddenly!” Book of Enoch 95:7: “Woe to you, unjust ones who persecute the righteous, for you yourselves will be handed over and persecuted because of that injustice, and the burden of your guilt will fall upon you!” Proverbs 11:8: “The righteous is delivered from trouble, and the wicked comes in his place.” Proverbs 16:4: “The Lord has made all things for Himself, even the wicked for the day of doom.”
Book of Enoch 94:10: “Unjust ones, I say to you that He who created you will overthrow you; upon your ruin, God will have no mercy, but rather, God will rejoice in your destruction.” Satan and his angels in hell: the second death. They deserve it for lying against Christ and His faithful disciples, accusing them of being the authors of Rome’s blasphemies in the Bible, such as love for the devil (the enemy).
Isaiah 66:24: “And they shall go out and look upon the corpses of the men who have rebelled against me; for their worm shall never die, nor shall their fire be quenched, and they shall be abhorrent to all flesh.” Mark 9:44: “Where their worm does not die, and the fire is never quenched.” Revelation 20:14: “Then Death and Hades were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death: the lake of fire.”


The false prophet: ‘From guilt to gold: transforming your prayers into my fortune.’
They are not wounded sheep: they are disguised predators, and their excuses no longer deceive.
The false prophet lives off the wicked who follow him; the righteous lives for the righteous who understand him.
False prophets need idols to profit—God needs none.
Justice is not charged for, because justice is not subject to bribery; what yields to bribery, even if it calls itself ‘justice’, is only an unjust legal system.
In exchange for your arms or legs, they give you a medal. They, on the other hand, never went to the front and remain whole in their palaces.
The statue does nothing, yet the false prophet tells you to crawl harder, kneel deeper, and pay quicker.
You don’t fight, dictator. You only send others to die. Because you know you’re not worth a bullet.
The same one who blesses a statue, blesses a bomb. The goal is one: to prepare slaves for a useful death.
The wicked cannot be corrected. He is not a sheep, he is a wolf. The sheep may stray, but returns to the right path if guided. The wolf pretends to be a sheep to inspire trust and betray later. The shepherd does not shepherd the wolf; he hunts it.

Իր Երկու Լուսինների Կողմից Կլանված Մոլորակը https://ellameencontrara.com/2026/07/01/%d5%ab%d6%80-%d5%a5%d6%80%d5%af%d5%b8%d6%82-%d5%ac%d5%b8%d6%82%d5%bd%d5%ab%d5%b6%d5%b6%d5%a5%d6%80%d5%ab-%d5%af%d5%b8%d5%b2%d5%b4%d5%ab%d6%81-%d5%af%d5%ac%d5%a1%d5%b6%d5%be%d5%a1%d5%ae-%d5%b4%d5%b8/
Satana știe… Șarpele nu se află în vârful lanțului trofic. https://144k.xyz/2026/08/02/satana-stie-sarpele-nu-se-afla-in-varful-lantului-trofic/
A pastor caught in a crime is not a fallen pastor, but a wolf unmasked. Not many people know this. Those who protect themselves with shouts fear the whisper of the truth.»
«If you follow the clues, you’ll see it. The false prophet defends the ‘prosperity gospel’: ‘God is omnipresent, but His voice is only activated when you fund the ministry’. Excuses of wolves, dismantled by reason: “God is doing something in his life,” yes: He is exposing him to show that some who come to the flock with the title of pastor do so to deceive and devour.
«Show your true power!» — Zeus challenges Gabriel //172
Apocalypse and the Chosen Ones – The Rescue UFOs. Daniel’s Prophecy – The Final Judgment UFOs //54
The prophecies that few know and in which almost no one believes: Rejuvenation and Immortality in prophecy. //67
The Roman Empire, Bahira, Muhammad, Jesus and persecuted Judaism. //654
The betrayal of Judas is a false story. The inconsistencies show that the betrayal of Judas is a Roman invention. However, today their church claims that if there are pedophile priests, it is because not even Jesus could avoid having a traitor like Judas within his church. John 13:18 says that the betrayal occurs so that the Scripture may be fulfilled: ‘He who eats my bread has lifted up his heel against me.’ John 6:64 says that Jesus knew from the beginning who would betray Him. 1 Peter 2:22 says that Jesus never sinned. However, this Scripture about the betrayal speaks of a man who sins, a man who trusted in the man who later betrayed him. But no one who knows in advance who a traitor is could trust in him. Psalm 41:4: ‘I said, Lord, be merciful to me; heal my soul, for I have sinned against You.’ Psalm 41:9: ‘Even my own familiar friend in whom I trusted, who ate my bread, has lifted up his heel against me.’ He does not love his enemies, but God sustains him because this sinner is righteous; therefore, love for the enemy was never the true message that Rome sought to destroy through persecution (Psalm 41:10–12; Proverbs 29:27; Daniel 12:10; Psalm 118:17–20). //63

Proverbs 29:27: ‘The righteous detest the wicked, and the wicked detest those who walk in uprightness.’ Proverbs 17:15: ‘He who justifies the wicked and he who condemns the righteous, both are an abomination to Jehovah.’ When Pope Francis says that no one deserves the death penalty because human dignity always prevails, and when he says that God loves everyone, Francis is saying: ‘This murderer has dignity, deserves life, and Jehovah loves him.’ [ROME — Pope Francis has declared that the death penalty is unacceptable… …in all cases ‘because it constitutes an attack on the inviolability and dignity of the person,’ the Vatican announced on August 2, thus reversing Roman Catholic teachings on this issue. August 2, 2018 – nytimes . com] 2 Thessalonians 2:8: ‘The lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord Jesus will kill with the breath of his mouth.’ Pope Francis declared that the death penalty is unacceptable in all cases, saying: ‘There is a growing awareness that the dignity of the person is not lost even after the commission of very serious crimes.’ Proverbs 28:4: ‘Those who forsake the law praise the wicked, but those who keep the law contend with them.’ Isaiah 11:4: ‘He will strike the wicked with the breath of his lips.’ If the religion of Jesus were linked to the law and the prophets, and Rome did not respect his message, it is logical to conclude that it did not respect either the law or the prophets. Therefore, the contradictions in the texts that Rome ended up calling the ‘Old Testament’ are not surprising. I will show you some examples: Genesis 4:15: murderer protected from the death penalty. Numbers 35:33: murderer condemned to death. Ezekiel 33:18-20: the righteous can become wicked, and the wicked can become righteous, versus Daniel 12:10: the righteous cannot become wicked, and the wicked cannot become righteous. Now, if the wicked could truly become righteous, the original message of Jesus would not have been persecuted by anyone, but accepted by all. //88

«