Life and Death Are in the Power of Words: Fools Suffer the Consequences of Their Own Words. █
Proverbs 18:21 Death and life are in the power of the tongue; And he who loves it will eat its fruits. Proverbs 18:7 The mouth of a fool is his ruin; his lips are a deadly trap.
[Man 1]: ‘Good is superior to evil’.
[Man 2]: ‘Do you really believe that? Good and evil cannot be separated’.
[Man 1]: ‘Good and evil can exist without being mixed together. Light prevails in the end’.
[Man 2]: ‘The war between good and evil is eternal, because both forces are equally powerful’.
[Man 1]: ‘Your words condemn you to eternal war, but with yourself’.
Reflections on yin and yang:
From a young age I was indoctrinated into Catholicism, as commonly happens to many young people in Peru, a predominantly Catholic country. I came to believe that its dogmas were the truth and that the Bible, defended by the Church, contained only the truth.
Due to circumstances in life, I came to examine the Bible more deeply. I encountered the message of Exodus 20:5 and immediately stopped being Catholic because I saw in Catholic practices a violation of that commandment regarding the treatment of images: do not bow down to them or honor them.
That revelation led me to believe that the Bible contained other revelations that I still had to discover. Furthermore, because different groups defended that book and its authority was recognized by numerous sectors of the world, I made the mistake of believing the official narrative and assuming that the Bible contained only the truth.
Over time, I was able to read more and found serious contradictions. Then I began to reflect. It is obvious: if Jesus existed and his message was one of justice, it is evident that this message could not please the unjust, because justice contradicts the interests and conduct of those who act unjustly. A just message is embraced by the just, but rejected by the unjust. And if that message had been capable of transforming absolutely all unjust people into just people, everyone would have been transformed and no one would have remained to persecute it. No one would have been an enemy of Jesus or his followers, because everyone would have embraced the original message.
But persecution did take place. If Rome persecuted that message, how can we maintain that the very empire that fought against it ended up truly converting to it? Why believe that what Rome made official is really the original message of Jesus?
No wonder certain teachings never made sense to me, such as turning the other cheek and doing good regardless of whom you are helping, treating everyone equally, regardless of whether they were just or unjust. Those things did not make sense to me, although at that time I was unaware of many of these issues.
Nor did it make sense to me that a just person would give his life for the unjust and forgive them as he died on the cross, when, by all appearances, according to certain messages in the Bible, the murderers did know what they were doing. In the parable of the wicked tenants, they kill the rightful heir to take possession of his property, whereas elsewhere in the Bible the victim appears saying that they should be forgiven because they do not know what they are doing. However, in the parable of the wicked tenants, they do know what they are doing. These contradictions reveal manipulation.
For all these reasons, I have reached the point where I no longer believe in the Bible as a book that contains exclusively the truth. That does not mean that I automatically reject everything it says: I still find some messages that make sense to me, such as the separation between the just and the unjust represented in the parable of the wheat and the tares. But I no longer accept everything it contains as truth simply because an institution or a tradition claims it is so.
My reflection on good and evil: the yin-yang symbol:
Two years before reading Exodus 20:5 for the first time, when I was 20 years old and still ignorant of many things, and was even still Catholic, I had an experience that I would remember many years later.
A fellow student at the IDAT institute, who was also a karate practitioner, drew a picture of yin and yang one day and asked me:
—José, do you know what that means?
I thought about it and finally answered that I did not know.
To help you better understand the story, you should know that he was an atheist, whereas I still believed in Catholicism and was unaware of many of these issues.
I remember that, a few days earlier, after leaving a group assignment, we had passed by a park across from which there was a church. Since I was Catholic, I made the sign of the cross when I saw it. Just imagine! Me, making the sign of the cross. But not only that: I also looked at my classmate and asked him:
—Don’t you make the sign of the cross?
Paradoxically, his name was Michael. He answered that he did not, that he was an atheist, that he did not believe in God and that he believed in himself.
When I heard him, I remembered a message from ‘A Look at Conscience’, by Brother Pablo. It told the testimony of a man who had everything, but who suddenly suffered an accident that he could not control. Then I replied to Michael that such things depended on God, not on oneself. After all, what good is it to believe in oneself if there are things beyond one’s control?
Michael remained silent.
Some time later, that same Michael drew the yin-yang symbol and explained its meaning to me. This time, however, I was the one who remained silent, because I did not know what that symbol represented.
Then he told me:
—This means good and evil, that good will always be equal to evil in strength and that both need each other.
Years passed and I remembered that conversation and that symbol again, which I had already seen earlier when I studied kung fu at the age of 14. By then, I had already acquired a great deal of knowledge thanks to my reading and personal experiences. I reflected again on Michael’s explanation, with which I had never agreed, since I had never accepted that the struggle between good and evil had to be eternal or that both were equally powerful forces. That was when I reached a different conclusion:
‘Well, there always has to be good and evil, the just and the unjust. It is logical: if there is no light, there is no darkness; if there are no just people, there are no unjust people’.
However, the fact that both exist does not mean that they have to be mixed together.
That is why, in my interpretation of the symbol, I removed those dots: the white dot, represented by that white circle inside the black area, and the black dot, that black circle inside the white area. To me, they do not have to be mixed together; they have to be separated.
Furthermore, I believe that good is superior to evil, because evil can imitate good, but never equal it. It is like bronze trying to pass itself off as gold: even if it tries to resemble gold, it does not become gold or acquire the same value.
That is why whatever imitates good, but never manages to equal it, is always inferior, just as gold is superior to any metal that attempts to imitate it.
My interpretation of Daniel 12:10: justice and ignorance:
I disagree with those who say that no one is completely just or unjust. I rather agree with the message of Daniel 12:10, which I interpret as follows: if the just person has some blemish, it does not have to be an unjust side, because that person has no unjust side, but rather ignorance that prevents them from acting fully in accordance with justice and leads them down the wrong path. That is why they need to be guided along the right path through knowledge.
When the just person acquires knowledge and frees themselves from that ignorance, they are purified and, as that verse expresses it, made white. It is like cleaning wheat, removing whatever dirties it.
I maintain that a just person is completely just and achieves perfection when they destroy the ignorance that causes them to stray from the path of justice.
Those who believe that the war between good and evil has to be eternal seem to love violence, because they do not even consider perpetual peace as a possibility. And if they do not consider it, then they have already surrendered to the idea that the conflict will never end.
So, why not make the forces of darkness remain in eternal conflict, but among themselves? If all the carnivorous animals in the wild never stopped fighting among themselves and were incapable of working as a team, peaceful herbivores could live in peace forever.
A certain passage in the Bible evokes for me the idea of an eternal conflict between the condemned and the worms. I do not believe that the condemned love the worms. However, if the worms never die and the condemned do not die either, then they would have an eternal conflict there, though not between good and evil, but between evil and evil.
Isaiah 66:24 says:
‘And they shall go out, and look upon the corpses of the men who rebelled against me; for their worm shall never die, nor shall their fire be quenched, and they shall be abhorrent to all mankind’.
Frauds hide behind force. The righteous win with intelligence. You won’t believe it until you analyze it. Word of Satan: ‘Memorizing, repeating, and believing my messages without thinking saves you… thinking for yourself, dismantling my messages, and not believing them condemns you.’ , BAC 2 83 76[342] , 0037
│ English │ #NGWAU
Trees Without the Sun? The Contradiction in Genesis 1 (Video language:German) /355/ https://youtu.be/1yZHUtKHSXY,
Day 233
The Rescue of the Chosen: A Critique of the Religious and Political System. (Video language:Indonesian) /235/ https://youtu.be/anhQziU8yL8
«The Day Satan Asked People Not to Worship Images.
When the Devil Said, ‘Do Not Worship Images’… He Was Still Deceiving People.
[DEVIL] ‘Do not worship images’.
[MAN] ‘What a miracle! Satan preaching against idolatry!’.
[DEVIL] ‘Do not worship them, just venerate them this way: bow down before them, kneel down, and pray to them’.
[MAN] ‘The devil always looking for the same actions using different verbs’.
An excellent short video with a very sharp message. The visual combination immediately grabs your attention, and the irony at the beginning — when Satan preaches while pretending to reject idolatry but simply changing the verbs used to describe the actions — sharply exposes how fundamental prohibitions are diluted through semantic subterfuge. In addition, the infographics and analytical slides interspersed throughout give it a documentary feel and a critical research perspective that deepens the video’s central thesis about the alteration of the commandments and the historical background behind it.
«
«In Mark 3:29, the ‘sin against the Holy Spirit’ is warned as unforgivable. However, history and the practices of Rome reveal a shocking moral inversion: the truly unforgivable sin, according to their dogma, is questioning the credibility of their Bible. Meanwhile, serious crimes such as the killing of innocents have been ignored or justified under the same authority that claimed to be infallible. This post examines how this ‘unique sin’ was constructed and how the institution used it to protect its power while justifying historical injustices.
In purposes contrary to Christ is the Antichrist, if you read Isaiah 11 you will see the mission of Christ in his second life, and it is not to favor everyone but only the righteous, but the Antichrist is inclusive, despite being unjust, he wants to climb onto Noah’s Ark, despite being unjust he wants to leave Sodom with Lot… Happy are those to whom these words are not offensive. He who is not offended by this message, that one is righteous, congratulations to him: Christianity was created by the Romans, only a mind friendly to celibacy, proper of Greek and Roman leaders, enemies of the ancient Jews, could conceive a message like the one that says: ‘These are the ones who did not defile themselves with women, for they remained virgins. They follow the Lamb wherever he goes. They were purchased from among mankind and offered as firstfruits to God and to the Lamb’ in Revelation 14:4, or a message like this one which is similar: ‘For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like the angels of God in heaven,’ in Matthew 22:30, both messages sound as if they came from a Roman Catholic priest, and not from a prophet of God who seeks this blessing for himself: He who finds a wife finds what is good and receives favor from the Lord (Proverbs 18:22), Leviticus 21:14 A widow, or a divorced woman, or a woman who has been defiled, or a prostitute, he shall not marry; but he shall take as a wife a virgin from his own people.
I am not Christian; I am henotheist. I believe in one supreme God above all, and I believe that several created gods exist—some faithful, others deceivers. I only pray to the supreme God. But since I was indoctrinated from childhood in Roman Christianity, I believed in its teachings for many years. I applied those ideas even when common sense told me otherwise. For example—so to speak—I turned the other cheek to a woman who had already struck me on one. A woman who, at first, acted like a friend, but then, without justification, began treating me as if I were her enemy, with strange and contradictory behavior. Influenced by the Bible, I believed she had become an enemy because of some spell, and that what she needed was prayer to return to being the friend she had once shown herself to be (or pretended to be). But in the end, everything only got worse. As soon as I had the chance to dig deeper, I uncovered the lie and felt betrayed in my faith. I came to understand that many of those teachings did not come from the true message of justice, but from Roman Hellenism infiltrated into the Scriptures. And I confirmed I had been deceived. That’s why I now denounce Rome and its fraud. I do not fight against God, but against the slanders that have corrupted His message. Proverbs 29:27 declares that the righteous hates the wicked. However, 1 Peter 3:18 claims that the righteous died for the wicked. Who can believe that someone would die for those he hates? To believe it is to have blind faith; it is to accept incoherence. And when blind faith is preached, could it be because the wolf wants his prey not to see the deception?
Jehovah will shout like a mighty warrior: ‘I will take vengeance on My enemies!’
(Revelation 15:3 + Isaiah 42:13 + Deuteronomy 32:41 + Nahum 1:2–7)
And what about the so-called ‘love for the enemy’ that, according to some Bible verses, the Son of Jehovah supposedly preached—claiming we should imitate His Father’s perfection through universal love? (Mark 12:25–37, Psalm 110:1–6, Matthew 5:38–48)
That is a lie spread by the enemies of both Father and Son.
A false doctrine born from mixing Hellenism with sacred words.»
«
Michael confronts the god Mars, a usurper. @JoseGalindoMMXXVI This channel exists to challenge dogmas that for centuries were imposed on peoples as if they were absolute truth. Many of those ideas did not spread through the force of reason, but through the weight of power, tradition, and, in other times, even by the sword. Here I analyze texts and doctrines to question what few dare to reexamine. If you seek to think for yourself and examine what others accept without questioning, this channel is for you and will give you a basis to detect even more lies than the ones I detected, and perhaps it will even encourage you to create your own channel to warn people who do not deserve to be deceived. //64
Daniel 12:1: ‘At that time Michael, the great prince, shall arise… There shall be a time of trouble such as never has been… but at that time your people shall be delivered, everyone who is found written in the book.’ John 8:32: ‘And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.’ Proverbs 11:8: ‘The righteous is delivered from trouble, and the wicked takes his place.’ Psalm 118:20: ‘This is the gate of the LORD; the righteous shall enter through it.’ These four passages form a selective message directed only to the righteous; however, the Roman framework contradicts it by teaching that ‘Christ died for sinners’ (Romans 5:8), that ‘all have sinned and all are justified’ (Romans 3:23–24), that ‘God desires all people to be saved’ (1 Timothy 2:4), that the unrighteous must be forgiven (Luke 23:34), and that even the enemies of the righteous must be loved (Matthew 5:44, Proverbs 29:27, Genesis 3:15). Thus, the universalism and Hellenism infiltrated by Rome erase the distinction between the righteous person who may sin through deception and the unrighteous person who sins by nature, destroying the righteous message in which only the righteous are delivered, purified, protected, and admitted through the gate. It would be unreasonable to suppose that this infiltration affected only the books attributed to Jesus or to the saints persecuted by the Roman Empire, and not the older writings. Revelation 12:9: ‘So the great dragon was cast out, that ancient serpent called the Devil and Satan, who deceives the whole world; he was cast to the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.’ Revelation 12:10: ‘Then I heard a loud voice in heaven, saying: Now salvation, and strength, and the kingdom of our God, and the authority of His Christ have come, for the accuser of our brothers, who accused them before our God day and night, has been cast down…’ How did he accuse them? With false testimonies against the saints. For example: ‘Moses said this, Ezekiel said this, Peter said this, Paul said this, Jesus said this,’ resulting in those messages serving justice in no way whatsoever, even though they appear in books that the world considers sacred because they are official. How did he deceive the world? Through those false testimonies: false sacred books, adulterated gospels, adulterated laws, adulterated prophecies, and dominant yet false religions founded upon those adulterated texts. How wonderful it is to see those lies from another perspective so that they can be recognized as lies rather than the truth! How wonderful it is to have an ‘eagle’s-eye view’ to recognize them! //709
They no longer worship my image but his’, Zeus //11
The Emperor is arrested; his useless statue can’t save him. //599
Walking on the edge of death along the dark path, but looking for the light, interpreting the lights projected on the mountains so as not to make a false step, to avoid death. //342
If Satan Rules the World… Whose Books Are Those? //1120
«
1 이 책은 무엇인가? https://bestiadn.com/2026/09/05/idi30eaglebook/ 2 El gato negro que devora a la paloma de la paz inmerecida que el César promueve para los hombres de alma negra https://ntiend.me/2026/08/13/el-gato-negro-que-devora-a-la-paloma-de-la-paz-inmerecida-que-el-cesar-promueve-para-los-hombres-de-alma-negra/ 3 Quem é responsável pelo mal, ‘Satanás’ ou a pessoa que comete o mal? https://bestiadn.com/2026/07/10/quem-e-responsavel-pelo-mal-satanas-ou-a-pessoa-que-comete-o-mal/ 4 Ang mga Propesiya ni Isaias na Humahamon sa mga Relihiyong Nilikha sa Pamamagitan ng Panlilinlang ng Imperyong Romano https://ellameencontrara.com/2026/05/16/ang-mga-propesiya-ni-isaias-na-humahamon-sa-mga-relihiyong-nilikha-sa-pamamagitan-ng-panlilinlang-ng-imperyong-romano/ 5 Programador amateur ridiculiza a Satanás https://depuracion-del-mensaje.blogspot.com/2026/04/programador-amateur-ridiculiza-satanas.html
«Has Isaiah’s Prophecy About the Desolate Cities Already Been Fulfilled?
According to the Bible, Isaiah says that some people will not see:
Isaiah 6:10:
‘Make the heart of this people dull, and make their ears heavy, and blind their eyes, lest they see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and understand with their heart, and be converted, and be healed.’
Isaiah 6:11-12:
Then I said, ‘How long, Lord?’ And He answered, ‘Until the cities lie waste without inhabitant, and the houses are without people, and the land becomes utterly desolate; until the LORD has removed men far away, and the abandoned places are multiplied in the midst of the land.’
And regarding other people, Isaiah says that they must see:
Isaiah 42:6-7:
‘I, the LORD, have called you in righteousness, and will hold your hand; I will keep you and give you as a covenant to the people, as a light to the nations, to open the eyes of the blind, to bring the prisoners out of the prison, and those who dwell in darkness out of the prison house.’
The Bible also says that Jesus came to bring judgment:
John 9:39:
‘And Jesus said, ‘For judgment I have come into this world, so that those who do not see may see, and those who see may become blind.»
The contradiction presented:
If Jesus had come to fulfill the prophecies of the final judgment, then the final judgment would already have brought justice through His judgment, yet we see that justice does not prevail. Therefore, that prophecy was not fulfilled through Him, because for it to be fulfilled in someone, that person must see justice triumph:
Isaiah 42:1-4:
‘Behold My servant, whom I uphold; My chosen one, in whom My soul delights. I have put My Spirit upon Him; He will bring justice to the nations.
He will not cry out, nor raise His voice, nor cause it to be heard in the streets.
A bruised reed He will not break, and a smoldering wick He will not extinguish; He will faithfully bring forth justice.
He will not fail nor be discouraged until He has established justice on the earth; and the coastlands shall wait for His law.’
However, the Bible presents Jesus as fulfilling that prophecy:
Matthew 12:16-21:
‘And He strictly warned them not to make Him known, so that what was spoken through the prophet Isaiah might be fulfilled:
‘Behold My Servant, whom I have chosen; My Beloved, in whom My soul is well pleased. I will put My Spirit upon Him, and He shall proclaim judgment to the Gentiles.
He will not quarrel, nor cry out, nor will anyone hear His voice in the streets.
A bruised reed He will not break, and a smoldering wick He will not extinguish, until He leads judgment to victory.
And in His name the Gentiles will hope.»
Here another inconsistency arises, not only because justice does not reign on the earth, but also because the Bible repeatedly shows Jesus speaking loudly and raising His voice before crowds, as in the Sermon on the Mount:
Matthew 5:1-2:
‘And seeing the multitudes, He went up on a mountain; and after He sat down, His disciples came to Him. Then He opened His mouth and taught them, saying…’
Consider this paradox:
Matthew 5:6:
‘Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for justice, for they shall be satisfied.’
In Matthew 5:6 He blesses those who hunger and thirst for justice—that is, the righteous. But further down we read:
Matthew 5:38-39:
‘You have heard that it was said, ‘An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.’ But I tell you, do not resist an evil person. Instead, if anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also.’
Is hungering and thirsting for justice the same as wanting to receive more attacks from an evil aggressor?
Matthew 5:17 says that He came to fulfill the Law, yet the Law commands that ‘eye for eye,’ which the very same passage alters:
Matthew 5:17:
‘Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.’
Matthew 5 portrays Him as fulfilling the Law that commands the removal of evil, while at the same time portraying Him as instructing people not to resist evil:
Deuteronomy 19:19-21:
‘Then you shall do to him as he intended to do to his brother; so you shall remove the evil from among you. And those who remain shall hear and fear, and shall never again commit any such evil among you. Your eye shall not pity: life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot.’
It can be concluded that the Roman institutional structure did not preserve the original message intact, but instead intervened in the texts. That alteration is not limited only to the words attributed to Jesus, but also extends to the traditions of the scribes and to the prophets of the Old Testament.
This is not about placing the Old Testament above the New Testament, but about pointing out the evident fractures throughout the entire body of the book.
A brief piece of evidence of these internal contradictions:
On the one hand, the covenant’s command requires performing ritual cuts on one’s own body:
Genesis 17:10–11:
‘This is My covenant, which you shall keep, between Me and you and your descendants after you: Every male among you shall be circumcised. You shall circumcise the flesh of your foreskin, and it shall be the sign of the covenant between Me and you.’
On the other hand, the same law explicitly forbids making any kind of cut or mark on the skin:
Leviticus 19:28:
‘You shall not make any cuts in your flesh for the dead, nor tattoo any marks on yourselves: I am the LORD.’
If the text commands, in one book, the performance of a mandatory bodily cut as a sign of belonging, but in another forbids interventions or cuts in the flesh, the lack of internal cohesion within the editorial collection is exposed.
If Jesus did not fulfill all the prophecies attributed to Him, when will they be fulfilled? When will Isaiah 6 be fulfilled?
Do you believe that by not resisting the one who is evil they overcome the dragon?
Revelation 12:17:
‘Then the dragon became furious with the woman and went off to wage war against the rest of her offspring, those who keep the commandments of God and hold to the testimony of Jesus Christ.’
This is the traditional answer usually given to this contradiction:
‘Official theology argues that the prophecy of Isaiah 6 has a ‘dual application’ or a two-stage fulfillment. According to this interpretation, the prophecy was first partially fulfilled during the Babylonian exile, and then had a second fulfillment in the days of Jesus to explain why most of the people did not accept Him (using the blindness of Isaiah 6:10 as a divine decree). Thus, they claim that the text does not contradict itself, but rather unfolds progressively.’
Now look at how we dismiss that traditional position:
To uphold that ‘dual application,’ institutional exegesis commits a blatant act of manipulation: it cuts the text wherever it is convenient.
They use the first part of the prophecy to justify the blindness and excuse why there was no visible triumph of justice, but they deliberately ignore the conclusion of the same passage in verse 13:
Isaiah 6:13:
‘But yet a tenth shall remain in it, and it shall again be consumed; yet as a terebinth tree or as an oak, whose stump remains when it is cut down, so the holy seed shall be its stump.’
If Isaiah 6 had already been fulfilled in the past under that traditional framework:
Where is that ‘holy seed’ (zera kodesh)? Where is the real restoration of the stump that brings true justice to the earth?
A prophecy cannot be declared ‘fulfilled’ by taking only the judgment and the blindness while ignoring the requirement of the reemergence of the holy seed and the establishment of the justice promised in Isaiah 42.
If we isolate Isaiah 6:11–12 to claim that it ‘was already fulfilled’ merely through physical destruction or exile, then verse 13 is left hanging and the prophecy remains incomplete.
The exact conclusion of the chapter raises the critical point that dismantles the idea of a past or final fulfillment:
Isaiah 6:13:
‘But yet a tenth shall remain in it, and it shall again be consumed; yet as a terebinth tree or as an oak, whose stump remains when it is cut down, so the holy seed shall be its stump.’
Here lies the heart of the matter:
A cycle that does not end with desolation: The text does not say that everything ends after the devastation; it says that whatever remains will again be consumed until only a ‘stump’ remains.
The identity of the ‘holy seed’: If the blindness and devastation were the judgment upon the corrupt masses or the hardened people, then the ‘holy seed’ (zera kodesh) represents the genuine remnant, the pure root that does not succumb to corruption or to the imposed blindness.
If it is maintained that Isaiah 6 was already fully fulfilled in the past (whether in Babylon or during the Roman era):
Where was the real restoration of the stump? The later institutions (including the imperial structure that compiled and edited the texts) kept the people under spiritual blindness and subjugation, without the manifestation of the triumphant justice spoken of by Isaiah.
The dilemma of the seed: If the ‘holy seed’ were the later institutionalized religious structure, then the persistence of the moral and textual contradictions within the canonized writings would make no sense.
Therefore, when the structure of the passage is analyzed, the prophecy of Isaiah 6 cannot be regarded as an event of the past or as something that an institutional system has already brought to completion. The ‘holy seed’ points to people capable of being set free from a system that wants them on their knees. This fits with the prophecies in Daniel 12:1–7, where a holy people and freedom for that people are spoken of.
It is not merely a matter of an apparent adjustment of the prophecies to fit an imperial agenda; the evidence demonstrates how the editors of the canon used the very same prophetic texts selectively and inconsistently:
The use of Isaiah against the Law and the dietary contradiction: In Matthew 15:1–11, the Gospels quote Jesus using Isaiah to rebuke those who insisted on keeping the traditional law, concluding with the statement that ‘it is not what enters the mouth that defiles a man.’ However, the prophet Isaiah himself directly contradicts this idea: in Isaiah 65:3–5 and Isaiah 66:17, the prophet explicitly condemns those who eat pork and abominable things, making it clear that, according to the prophetic vision, even in the time of final judgment there are foods that do defile a human being.
The invention of the doctrine of the virgin birth (Isaiah 7:14–16): Both Christianity and Islam embraced the doctrine that Gabriel announced a virgin birth in fulfillment of Isaiah (Matthew 1 / Qur’an 19). But when the original text of Isaiah 7 is examined, it becomes clear that it does not announce Jesus, nor does it speak of a ‘perpetual virgin’:
The sign was given specifically to King Ahaz and was to be fulfilled immediately, before the child knew how to distinguish between good and evil.
Isaiah speaks of a young woman (almáh), not of a woman who would remain a virgin after giving birth.
The historical fulfillment occurred with Hezekiah, the faithful king in the days of Ahaz, who destroyed the bronze serpent (2 Kings 18:4–7), had God with him (Immanuel), and witnessed the defeat of Assyria prophesied by Isaiah (2 Kings 19:35–37).
The accommodative use of applying fragments out of context demonstrates that the original meaning of the text was not respected, but rather re-edited and forced in order to indoctrinate.
The Roman Distortion of Hosea 6:2 and the Chronological Mismatch
Apocalyptic prophecies and their dogmatic interpretation not only incur identity contradictions, but also break the chronology in order to conceal the true restoration of the righteous people.
We can observe this here:
Revelation 12:7–10:
‘Then there was a great war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon… And the great dragon was cast out… he was cast to the earth, and his angels were cast out with him. Therefore rejoice, O heavens, and you who dwell in them.’
Revelation 12:12, 17:
‘Woe to the inhabitants of the earth and of the sea! For the devil has come down to you with great wrath… Then the dragon was enraged with the woman, and he went to make war with the rest of her offspring, those who keep the commandments of God and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.’
The book of Revelation fragments the scene by presenting the ‘inhabitants of heaven’ as the victors on one hand, but then shows the righteous within the camp of the ‘inhabitants of the earth and the sea’ once again suffering the attack of the dragon who was supposedly already defeated once and for all, as though the righteous had not truly triumphed.
If the narrative itself states that the victors despised their lives unto death in order to overcome the dragon, this directly evokes those who preferred death rather than eating pork—such as the testimony of 2 Maccabees 7, where physical surrender took place under the certainty of inheriting eternal life.
Would they then have to return to life in order to be attacked and die once again? Would they have to return to life in order to accept a dogma created by other peoples foreign to their own, in which they are commanded to worship a man under the absurdity that he is man and at the same time God, and whom imperial tradition furthermore portrays with the same visual appearance as Zeus—the very pagan god worshiped by those who executed them? Would they rise again only to hear the aberration that eating pork no longer defiles (Matthew 15:11, 1 Corinthians 10:27), or that they must bow before a created being (Hebrews 1:6)? Would they truly have to be attacked and die once more? If they had to die again, that new existence would never be eternal life.
To be in heaven is to be with God: ‘To be in heaven’ or with God does not refer to an incorporeal physical place among the clouds, but rather to the condition of being under His protection and of God being with someone. As Psalm 118:6–7 states: ‘The LORD is with me; I will not fear. What can man do to me?’
The dead do not wage war. It is the living righteous who are with God, and being with Him does not initially exempt them from facing war against the hostile on the earth.
In order to divert this chronological line and conceal the awakening of this side, Roman theology took the prophecy of Hosea 6:2 and falsely applied it to the resurrection of Jesus after 48 hours:
Hosea 6:1–2:
‘Come, and let us return to the LORD; for He has torn us, and He will heal us; He has struck us, and He will bind us up. After two days He will give us life; on the third day He will raise us up, and we shall live before Him.’
The prophecy does not describe Jesus returning to life after a literal 48 hours, but rather the chronological scale of a collective people who reincarnate.
Under the prophetic equivalence in which one day represents one thousand years (Psalm 90:4):
After two days (after 48 hours / 2,000 years): Corresponds to the period of dispersion and ignorance that has elapsed since the beginning of this era.
The third day (the third millennium): Is the present period in which we now live, when that righteous side returns to biological life.
One of the pillars of Roman dogma is that salvation is attained solely by believing that Jesus rose from the dead. However, when this premise is compared with the prophetic texts that the Church used to support it, the figure of a resurrected and perfect Jesus collapses completely:
The heir who sins and is punished (Psalm 118): In the parable of the wicked tenants (Matthew 21:33–44), the Church attributes to Jesus the rejected stone of Psalm 118:22. Nevertheless, Psalm 118 describes a righteous man who sins, is punished by God (‘The LORD has chastened me severely, but He has not given me over to death’), and then passes through the gate of righteousness. If this referred to the resurrected Jesus descending from heaven, he could not sin, since he would already know the whole truth. By contrast, if it refers to the righteous seed who reincarnates, its initial passage through ignorance explains why it sins, is rebuked, and is later purified. If he does not return from the clouds, he himself is among that holy seed, but has no way of knowing it, because a new body retains no memories experienced in another body that has already been destroyed.
The confession of sin and the betrayal (Psalm 41): Theology claims that Jesus never sinned and knew from the beginning who would betray him. Yet Psalm 41:4, 9—forced by dogma into being a prophecy about Jesus—speaks of a righteous man who admits having sinned (‘LORD, have mercy on me; heal my soul, for I have sinned against You’) and who naively trusted the one who betrayed him (‘Even my own familiar friend, in whom I trusted, who ate my bread, has lifted up his heel against me’). Trusting a traitor never fits the narrative of an omniscient Jesus, but it does fit a righteous man reincarnated on earth.
Multiple betrayers and the myth of Judas (Psalm 109): Psalm 41 does not speak of a single betrayer, but of several enemies. Once this passage collapses as a prophecy fulfilled in Jesus, the deception that Psalm 109 was fulfilled also collapses: a fabricated dogma that invented the figure of a single traitor (Judas). The falsehood of this dogma is exposed within the contradictory accounts of the Romanized text itself—contradictions deliberately created as a strategic device to reinforce the central falsehood while diverting attention toward secondary contradictions that give it a mask of credibility. These texts present two mutually exclusive accounts of Judas’ death: one states that he hanged himself (Matthew 27:5), while the other maintains that he bought a field, fell headlong, and burst open in the middle (Acts 1:18).
Psalm 41 connects directly with Psalm 118: both point to the time of the end. The righteous sinner is not an ethereally resurrected Jesus, but rather the collective righteous who, after reincarnating and falling into deception, are forgiven and purified when they understand the imperial falsehood. By turning away from the dogma, they pass through the gates of righteousness because they are the understanding ones who inherit the earth in this third millennium.
«
«The images of the Devil were passed off as images of the saints
From Mars to Saint Michael: How the Roman Empire Gave Its Statues Wings: the image of the Devil was passed off as the image of the saint.
[BLOCK 1 – THE ORIGIN OF ICONOGRAPHY AND THE PROHIBITION]
We have been told over and over again that this image represents good and evil: on the right, Jesus; on the left, the devil. We were taught that evil is the dark-skinned man with short hair, while good is the white-skinned man with long hair and a halo or solar crown over his head.
But before taking this for granted, ask yourself a key question: where does this version of events actually come from?
It comes from the Roman Empire and from the ecclesiastical structure that inherited its power. The same empire that executed Jesus openly worshiped solar gods.
This is where the logic breaks down. There are ancient texts such as Exodus 20 and Deuteronomy 4 that establish a clear and categorical prohibition: do not worship or bow down before any representation, whether of the heavens, the earth, men, the sun, or the moon.
If the Roman Empire worshiped the sun, persecuted the original message, and then built the official Church… why should we assume that its conversion was sincere? If today people are required to bow before representations and elements that directly replicate solar symbolism, are we not seeing exactly the same imperial worship, but under a different name?
The text of Habakkuk 2 puts it with devastating clarity: What good is a mute image? Can it possibly teach anything?
A sculpture or a painting does not hear, does not understand, and has no spirit. The prohibition against worshiping them is not a blind dogma; it is a rational position. An image cannot do anything for you.
This does not mean accepting as valid everything that has survived to the present day. If these texts passed for centuries through the filter and editing of imperial hands, textual manipulation is not merely a possibility: it is a historical certainty. They rewrote the accounts of their time and retouched the oldest writings to consolidate their power.
[BLOCK 2 – THE CONTRADICTION OF LONG HAIR]
Let us clarify something fundamental: this is not about defending the biblical text or assuming that everything it contains is authentic. History shows that the manuscript that reached us passed through filters and interpolations to align with the interests of imperial power. However, even within these texts, their own logic exposes the cracks in the visual tradition that was sold to us.
Let us take the representation of long hair as an example. Official iconography portrayed a long-haired Jesus, but if we analyze letters such as 1 Corinthians 11, the narrative collapses through simple internal consistency.
In that writing, Paul explicitly states two things: first, that he is an imitator of Christ; and second, that for a man it is a dishonor or a shame to let his hair grow long.
The mathematical conclusion is unavoidable: neither that apostle nor the historical Jesus wore long hair. It is a matter of basic logical honesty. No one who claims to faithfully follow a teacher would call the very appearance of that teacher a ‘shame.’
Where, then, does the image of the man with long hair, light skin, and a solar crown come from? It does not come from historical reality or from the context of the first century. It comes from Roman aesthetic assimilation, which took the features of its own pagan deities and gave them the name of Jesus to facilitate religious control. We were sold a portrait fabricated by the same empire that destroyed the original message.
[BLOCK 3 – THE FALLACY IN THE DESERT TEMPTATION]
We have also been told that this painting represents the supposed temptation of Jesus in the desert. However, when we analyze the texts that the official structure used to support that account —such as Matthew 4—, the seams once again come apart.
In that passage, Psalm 91 is quoted to support the scene: ‘He shall give his angels charge over thee, to keep thee in all thy ways. They shall bear thee up in their hands, lest thou dash thy foot against a stone.’ But if you read Psalm 91 in its entirety, the protagonist of that text is someone to whom nothing happens, someone at whose side a thousand and ten thousand fall on his right, but harm does not reach him.
That scenario was never fulfilled in the historical Jesus. He was executed; he fell before imperial violence, and many did not fall before him.
This painting was presented to us as the pious account of an overcome temptation, when in reality they passed off a text about protection and invulnerability that was not fulfilled, forcing it to give validity to the narrative they constructed. It is another example of how the empire took incomplete fragments to force prophecies and consolidate a story tailored to its interests.
[BLOCK 4 – THE CONTRADICTION OF THE KINGDOMS AND WORSHIP]
The temptation account adds another element that collapses through simple deductive analysis. We are told that Satan offered Jesus all the kingdoms of the earth in exchange for bowing down and worshiping him.
Now, think about it coldly: if Satan rules all the kingdoms of the earth, is it logical to assume that the books and official canons approved by the empires of this world contain an intact truth? Or is it not more logical to conclude that those same official writings are infiltrated and edited by those who control those kingdoms?
But the contradiction becomes even more evident when analyzing the behavior attributed to Jesus in other passages. In the account of the ten lepers who were healed, the narrative shows Jesus allowing the only one who returned to bow at his feet, stating that only he gave glory to God.
Here we must ask the fundamental questions: Would a righteous man who respects God ask other human beings to kneel before him? Would he demand exactly the same thing that Satan supposedly asked him to do in the desert?
We are presented with a character molded in the image of imperial kings and solar gods, tolerating and encouraging people to bow before him. And to make matters worse, in passages such as Hebrews 1:6 they claim that all the angels must worship him.
This clashes head-on with older writings such as Psalm 97, where it is clearly established that worship belongs exclusively to Jehovah —the Creator who is not a creature and who cannot die—. Jesus, on the other hand, according to the account itself, died.
The pieces fabricated by the empire simply do not fit.
[BLOCK 5 – THE MANIPULATION IN THE QUOTATION OF PSALM 69]
To dispel any doubt about how these writings were manipulated and assembled, let us analyze a concrete example that was sold to us as the supreme act of love, but which completely falls apart when the original sources are examined.
The traditional narrative tells us that, while on the cross, Jesus was given vinegar to drink in order to ‘fulfill a scripture,’ and that at that very moment he prayed for his executioners, saying: ‘Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.’ We were taught to see this as an example of forgiveness carried through to the final breath. But what does the cited prophecy actually say?
The reference to vinegar comes from Psalm 69. However, when you read the full context of that psalm, the tone is not one of forgiveness or love toward enemies; it is the exact opposite.
The protagonist of that psalm is not asking forgiveness for those who are torturing him. He is asking for judgment: he demands that the banquet of his enemies become a trap, that their eyes be blinded, and that wrath fall upon them.
How is it possible for an act presented as supreme forgiveness to cite as its support a text in which the protagonist cries out for the ruin of his aggressors?
Here the seam of Roman editing is exposed. They took isolated verses to force the fulfillment of supposed prophecies, creating a pious narrative that promoted resignation and submission before the oppressor, while deliberately ignoring the original context of the writing. We were sold a story made over by the same hands that edited the book.
[BLOCK 6 – THE INVERSION OF THE IMAGE]
In light of this evidence and these historical contradictions, the conclusion is unavoidable: the Roman Empire never adopted or preached the original teaching it persecuted; rather, it absorbed it and molded it to suit its own purposes.
That is why the definitive question must be asked by looking directly at the iconography that was imposed upon us.
Look carefully at this representation. If the historical framework of first-century Judea indicates that the local population had darker complexions and wore short hair —in accordance with the letters attributed to Paul—, it is contradictory that the figure of the ‘righteous man’ was drawn with Nordic features, long hair, and imperial solar elements.
Could it be that history was completely inverted? Who really represents the oppressor in that painting, and who represents the righteous man who refused to submit to the empire?
The empire dressed its own image in the mantle of holiness and portrayed the features of the subjected people under the figure of the adversary. We were taught to venerate the aesthetic of the dominator and reject the actual appearance of the persecuted.
Think about it. The answer is not found in blind faith, but in questioning whom the image before which you kneel benefits.
[BLOCK 7 – THE MILITARY AESTHETIC OF THE SUPPOSED IMAGE]
If there is still any doubt about how the aesthetic of the subjugator was perpetuated, all you have to do is observe the supposed image with which they represented the celestial protector, Saint Michael.
Look carefully at the official statues and paintings. You do not see a spiritual entity there; you literally see the image of a Roman legionary. He is equipped with a helmet, cuirass, raised sword, and military sandals. It is almost an exact replica of the statues of the god Mars that Rome already worshiped.
The iconographic deception is absolute: they taught people to kneel before a representation dressed exactly like the soldiers who persecuted and executed the true followers.
They took the figure of the military oppressor, added wings to him, and told people that this was the image of the protector. Teaching people to venerate the aesthetic of the dominator is proof that the empire did not change its devotion; it only changed the names of its statues.
«
«Walking on the edge of death along the dark path, but looking for the light, interpreting the lights projected on the mountains so as not to make a false step, to avoid death. █
Night was falling on the main road.
A blanket of darkness covered the winding path that wound through the mountains.
He did not walk aimlessly.
His goal was freedom, but the journey had only just begun.
With his body numb from the cold and his stomach empty for days,
he had no company but the elongated shadow cast by the headlights of the trucks that roared beside him,
advancing without stopping, indifferent to his presence.
Every step was a challenge,
every curve a new trap from which he had to emerge unscathed.
For seven nights and mornings,
he was forced to advance along the thin yellow line of a narrow road with just two lanes,
while trucks, buses and trailers whizzed by just inches from his body.
In the darkness, the deafening roar of engines enveloped him,
and the lights of trucks coming from behind cast their glow on the mountain in front of him.
At the same time, other trucks approached in the opposite direction,
forcing him to decide in fractions of a second
whether to pick up the pace or remain still in his precarious crossing,
where every movement meant the difference between life and death.
Hunger was a beast that devoured him from the inside,
but the cold was no less merciless.
In the sierra, the early hours of the morning were invisible claws that penetrated to the bones.
The wind enveloped him with its icy breath,
as if it wanted to extinguish the last spark of life that remained to him.
He took refuge where he could,
sometimes under a bridge,
other times in a corner of concrete that offered him a minimum of shelter.
But the rain was unforgiving.
Water seeped into his torn clothes,
sticking to his skin and stealing what little warmth he still had.
The trucks continued their march,
and he, stubbornly hoping that someone would feel sorry,
raised his hand, waiting for a gesture of humanity.
But the drivers drove on.
Some with looks of contempt,
others simply ignoring him, as if he were a ghost.
Every now and then, a compassionate soul would stop and offer him a quick ride,
but they were few.
Most saw him as a nuisance,
a shadow on the road,
someone not worth helping.
On one of those endless nights,
desperation drove him to search for food among the scraps left by travelers.
He was not ashamed to admit it:
he fought for food with pigeons,
snatching pieces of hardened biscuits before they could make them disappear.
It was an unequal fight,
but he was determined:
he was not willing to kneel before any image,
nor to accept any man as ‘only lord and savior’.
He was not willing to please those sinister individuals
who had already kidnapped him three times over religious differences,
who with their slanders had led him to walk that yellow line.
At another time, a kind man offered him a piece of bread and a drink.
A small gesture,
but in his pain,
that kindness was a balm.
But indifference was the norm.
When he asked for help,
many would walk away,
as if they feared that his misery was contagious.
Sometimes, a simple ‘no’ was enough to extinguish all hope,
but on other occasions, contempt was reflected in cold words or empty looks.
He didn’t understand how they could ignore someone who could barely stand,
how they could watch a man collapse without batting an eyelid.
And yet, he kept going.
Not because he had the strength,
but because he had no other choice.
He continued down the road,
leaving behind him miles of asphalt,
nights without rest and days without food.
Adversity hit him with everything it had,
but he resisted.
Because deep down,
even in the most absolute desperation,
the spark of survival still burned within him,
fueled by the desire for freedom and justice.
Psalm 118:17
‘I will not die, but I will live to proclaim the works of Jehovah.
18 Jehovah has chastened me severely, but He has not given me over to death.’
Psalm 41:4
‘I said, ‘Jehovah, have mercy on me
and heal me, for I confess with repentance that I have sinned against You.»
Job 33:24-25
‘God will have mercy on him and say, ‘Deliver him from going down to the pit; I have found a ransom;
25 his flesh shall become fresher than in childhood, and he shall return to the days of his youth.»
Psalm 16:8
‘I have set Jehovah always before me;
because He is at my right hand, I will not be shaken.’
Psalm 16:11
‘You will show me the path of life;
in Your presence, there is fullness of joy;
at Your right hand, there are pleasures forevermore.’
Matthew 7:14 For small is the gate and narrow the way that leads to life, and few are those who find it.
Leviticus 21:13 He shall take a virgin as his wife. 14 He shall not take a widow, a divorced woman, a disgraced woman, or a prostitute, but he shall take a virgin as his wife from among his own people, 15 so that he will not profane his offspring among his people; for I, the Lord, am the one who sanctifies them.
Isaiah 51:7 Listen to me, you who know righteousness, you people in whose hearts is my law: Do not fear the reproach of men, nor be dismayed by their insults. 8 For the moth will eat them up like a garment, and the worm will devour them like wool; but my righteousness will stand forever, and my salvation through all generations.
Psalm 119:1 Blessed are those who are consistent in their way, who walk according to the law of Jehovah.
Deuteronomy 19:18 The judges shall investigate thoroughly, and if that witness is found to be false and has falsely accused his brother, 19 then you shall do to him as he intended to do to his brother, and you shall purge the evil from among you. 20 Those who remain shall hear and be afraid, and shall no longer commit such wickedness among you. 21 You shall show him no pity; life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot.
Psalm 119:34 Give me understanding, and I will keep your law, and obey it with all my heart.
Daniel 12:3 Those who are wise will shine like the brightness of the heavens, and those who lead many to righteousness, like the stars for ever and ever.
Psalm 41:11-12
‘By this, I will know that You are pleased with me:
if my enemy does not triumph over me.
Micah 7:10 And my enemy shall see it, and shame shall cover her; she who said to me, ‘Where is Jehovah your God?’ My eyes shall see her; now she shall be trampled down like mud in the streets.
Psalms 41:12 As for me, You uphold me in my integrity
and set me in Your presence forever.’
Revelation 11:4
‘These witnesses are the two olive trees and the two lampstands standing before the God of the earth.’
Isaiah 11:2
‘The Spirit of Jehovah shall rest upon him:
the Spirit of wisdom and understanding, the Spirit of counsel and might, the Spirit of knowledge and the fear of Jehovah’
I made the mistake of defending the faith in the Bible, but out of ignorance. However, now I see that it is not the guiding book of the religion that Rome persecuted, but of the one it created to please itself with celibacy. That’s why they preached a Christ who doesn’t marry a woman, but rather His church, and angels who, despite having male names, do not look like men (draw your own conclusions). These figures are akin to the false saints—plaster-statue kissers—and similar to the Greco-Roman gods because, in fact, they are the same pagan gods under different names.
What they preach is a message incompatible with the interests of true saints. Therefore, this is my penance for that unintentional sin. By denying one false religion, I deny them all. And when I finish doing my penance, then God will forgive me and bless me with her, with that special woman I need. Because, although I don’t believe in the entire Bible, I do believe in what seems right and consistent to me within it; the rest is slander from the Romans.
Proverbs 28:13
‘He who covers his sins will not prosper, but whoever confesses and forsakes them will have mercy from the Lord.’
Proverbs 18:22
‘He who finds a wife finds a treasure and receives favor from the Lord.’
I seek the Lord’s favor embodied in that special woman.
She must be as the Lord commands that she be.
If this upsets you, it is because you have lost:
Leviticus 21:14
‘A widow, or a divorced woman, or a defiled woman, or a prostitute, he shall not marry these, but he shall marry a virgin from his own people.’
To me, she is glory:
1 Corinthians 11:7
‘Woman is the glory of man.’
Glory is victory, and I will find it with the power of light. Therefore, even though I don’t know her yet, I have named her: Light Victory.
And I nicknamed my web pages ‘UFOs’ because they travel at the speed of light, reaching corners of the world and shooting out rays of truth that strike down the slanderers. With the help of my web pages, I will find her, and she will find me.
When she finds me and I find her, I will tell her this:
‘You have no idea how many programming algorithms I had to devise to find you. You can’t imagine all the difficulties and adversaries I faced to find you, my Light of Victory.
I faced death itself many times:
Even a witch pretended to be you. Imagine, she told me she was the light, despite her slanderous behavior. She slandered me like no one else, but I defended myself like no one else to find you. You are a being of light; that’s why we were made for each other!
Now let’s get out of this damn place…
So this is my story. I know she will understand me, and so will the righteous.
Isaiah 51:6 Lift up your eyes to the heavens, and look down upon the earth; for the heavens shall vanish away like smoke, and the earth shall grow old like a garment, and its inhabitants shall perish in like manner; but my salvation shall be forever, and my righteousness shall not perish.
Psalms 16:11
‘You will show me the path of life;
in your presence there is fullness of joy;
at your right hand are pleasures forevermore.’
Matthew 7:13-14 Enter through the narrow gate; for wide is the gate and broad is the way that leads to destruction, and many are those who enter through it; for narrow is the gate and difficult is the way that leads to life, and few are those who find it.
Leviticus 21:13 He shall take a virgin as his wife. 14 He shall not take a widow, or a divorced woman, or one who has been defiled, or a prostitute; but he shall take a virgin of his own people as his wife, 15 so that he may not profane his offspring among his people; for I, the LORD, am the one who sanctifies them.
Psalms 118:20 This is the gate of the LORD; the righteous shall enter through it.
Proverbs 19:14 House and riches are an inheritance from fathers, but a prudent wife is from the LORD.
Daniel 12:13 But as for you, Daniel, go your way until the end; you shall rest, and then you shall rise to receive your inheritance at the end of the days.
Daniel 12:9 He replied, ‘Go your way, Daniel, for these words are closed up and sealed until the time of the end.’
Revelation 10:5-7 And the angel whom I saw standing on the sea and on the earth lifted up his hand to heaven, 6 and swore by him who lives forever and ever, who created heaven and the things in it, and the earth and the things in it, and the sea and the things in it, that there would be no more delay, 7 but in the days of the voice of the seventh angel, when he is about to sound the trumpet, the mystery of God will be fulfilled, as he declared to his servants the prophets.
Daniel 12:7 And I heard the man clothed in linen, who was above the waters of the river; he raised his right hand and his left hand toward heaven and swore by him who lives forever that it would be for a time, times, and half a time. And when the shattering of the power of the holy people is completed, all these things shall be fulfilled.
And when I find her, I will say to her: ‘Thank you for finding me, virgin of the gate, come, embrace me, and let me give you a kiss on the mouth…’
I have been a computer programmer, I like logic, in Turbo Pascal I created a program capable of producing basic algebra formulas at random, similar to the formula below. In the following document in .PDF you can download the code of the program, this is proof that I’m not stupid, that’s why the conclusions of my research should be taken seriously. https://ntiend.me/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/math21.pdf
If b*6=26 then b=4.33
«Cupid is condemned to hell along with the other pagan gods (The fallen angels for their rebellion against justice, sent to eternal punishment). █
Quoting these passages does not mean defending the entire Bible. If 1 John 5:19 says that “the whole world is under the power of the evil one,” but rulers swear on the Bible, then the Devil rules with them. If the Devil rules with them, then fraud also rules with them. Therefore, the Bible contains part of that fraud, camouflaged among truths. By connecting those truths, we can expose their deceptions. Righteous people need to know these truths so that, if they have been deceived by lies added to the Bible or other similar books, they can free themselves from them.
Daniel 12:7 And I heard the man clothed in linen, who was above the waters of the river, when he raised his right hand and his left hand to heaven and swore by Him who lives forever that it shall be for a time, times, and half a time. And when the power of the holy people is completely shattered, all these things shall be finished.
Considering that ‘Devil’ means ‘Slanderer,’ it is natural to expect that the Roman persecutors, being the adversaries of the saints, later bore false witness against the saints and their messages. Thus, they themselves are the Devil, and not an intangible entity that enters and exits people, as they made us believe precisely with passages like Luke 22:3 (“Then Satan entered Judas…”), Mark 5:12-13 (the demons entering the pigs), and John 13:27 (“After the morsel, Satan entered him”).
This is my purpose: to help righteous people not waste their power believing in the lies of impostors who have adulterated the original message, which never asked anyone to kneel before anything or pray to anything that had ever been visible.
It is no coincidence that in this image, promoted by the Roman Church, Cupid appears alongside other pagan gods. They have given the names of the true saints to these false gods, but look at how these men dress and how they wear their long hair. All this goes against faithfulness to God’s laws because it is a sign of rebellion, a sign of the fallen angels (Deuteronomy 22:5).
The serpent, the devil, or Satan (the slanderer) in hell (Isaiah 66:24, Mark 9:44). Matthew 25:41: “Then he will also say to those on his left: ‘Depart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire that has been prepared for the devil and his angels’.” Hell: the eternal fire prepared for the serpent and his angels (Revelation 12:7-12), for having combined truths with heresies in the Bible, the Quran, the Torah, and for having created false forbidden gospels that they called apocryphal, to give credibility to lies in the false sacred books, all in rebellion against justice.
Book of Enoch 95:6: “Woe to you, false witnesses and to those who weigh the price of injustice, for you will perish suddenly!” Book of Enoch 95:7: “Woe to you, unjust ones who persecute the righteous, for you yourselves will be handed over and persecuted because of that injustice, and the burden of your guilt will fall upon you!” Proverbs 11:8: “The righteous is delivered from trouble, and the wicked comes in his place.” Proverbs 16:4: “The Lord has made all things for Himself, even the wicked for the day of doom.”
Book of Enoch 94:10: “Unjust ones, I say to you that He who created you will overthrow you; upon your ruin, God will have no mercy, but rather, God will rejoice in your destruction.” Satan and his angels in hell: the second death. They deserve it for lying against Christ and His faithful disciples, accusing them of being the authors of Rome’s blasphemies in the Bible, such as love for the devil (the enemy).
Isaiah 66:24: “And they shall go out and look upon the corpses of the men who have rebelled against me; for their worm shall never die, nor shall their fire be quenched, and they shall be abhorrent to all flesh.” Mark 9:44: “Where their worm does not die, and the fire is never quenched.” Revelation 20:14: “Then Death and Hades were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death: the lake of fire.”
Word of Satan: «Make them change churches, priests, and translations, but never allow them to abandon blind obedience.»
Word of Satan: ‘A thorn in the flesh… a messenger of Satan to slap you. Three times you begged me to remove it, but I said: Give the other cheek to my messenger. Thus you will boast of your weakness, while I will be powerful thanks to your submission.’
Without statues or images, the false prophet is unemployed. Without lies, he disappears.
The false prophet leads his followers through the paths of lies, because lies always have a price: they are sold and bought. The truly instructed righteous guides other righteous ones on the path of justice and never charges, because truth is not negotiated, traded, or for sale.
Word of Satan: ‘Blessed are the intelligent men who do not read my scriptures… because they will not see the contradictions.’
The test of meat reveals whether it is a genuine lamb or a disguised wolf. The wolf in sheep’s clothing pretends to be meek, but meat awakens its instinct.
They say they send you to defend the homeland, but in reality, they send you to defend their interests. They don’t give you explanations, they give you orders. And if you return without a leg, maybe they’ll give you a medal… but they will never give your leg back.
Word of Satan: ‘Bless those who curse you… let hell reward your stupidity while you bless that place even if it curses you.’
Word of Satan: ‘Rome stopped worshiping my image and walking in my path; now it follows the one who denied me. Why is it that his image looks so much like mine and that his path demands that they love me… even though I am the enemy?’
Word of Satan (Zeus, the Devil): ‘I am the one who kidnapped Ganymede; my favorite disciples were men, and my priests, faithful to Hellenic celibacy, follow my designs without question.’
La bancarización obligatoria de los sueldos no solo sucedió en Perú: sucedió en simultáneo en otros países de Sudamérica y con las mismas excusas. Es como un gobierno mundial a quien los «derechos humanos», que se oponen a la pena de muerte para extorsionadores y asaltantes, les vienen como anillo al dedo… Es como una lucha contra todos los pequeños competidores para quedarse con todo, usando al criminal y su amenaza como herramienta. https://bestiadn.com/2026/09/21/la-bancarizacion-obligatoria-de-los-sueldos-no-solo-sucedio-en-peru-sucedio-en-simultaneo-en-otros-paises-de-sudamerica-y-con-las-mismas-excusas-es-como-un-gobierno-mundial-a-quien-los-derecho/
Zeus i Ganimedes https://purifying-the-message.blogspot.com/2026/08/zeus-i-ganimedes.html
Frauds hide behind force. The righteous win with intelligence. You won’t believe it until you analyze it. Word of Satan: ‘Memorizing, repeating, and believing my messages without thinking saves you… thinking for yourself, dismantling my messages, and not believing them condemns you.'»
