If Satan Rules the World… Whose Books Are Those? █
There is a contradiction that every interpretation of these passages must resolve: if you claim that Satan rules the world, the logical consequence is that he also rules the empire that imposes, promotes, and disseminates the very books that this same world regards as sacred.
You cannot maintain that the dragon controls the kingdoms of the earth, their laws, their institutions, and their elites, while at the same time believing that the books upon which the rulers of those kingdoms swear their oaths—and which those same powers promote and distribute worldwide—were miraculously exempt from his deception.

The deception is not only hidden; above all, it is found in what is obvious: in the books that this kingdom regards as sacred, and in the false «liberating» movement that promises an awakening while never breaking the ritual. If the ritual continues—changing only the excuse—there has been no liberation.
Below is the complete structure and the exact transcript of the video.
[Satan]: «Where I reign, my books reign. Before them, subject kings swear their oaths.»
[The Deceived]: «Time to kneel.»
[The False Liberator]: «Did you know they distract you to block your critical thinking and keep you under control? You’ve already awakened. Share this video and awaken others.»
[The Deceived]: «Time to kneel.»
[Satan]: «I will descend to the earth to help the oppressed. I will give them rest. Charge double for double the distance. Where I reign, my books reign. Before them, subject kings swear their oaths.»
[Narrator]:
«If you say that Satan already ruled the world in Jesus’ time because, in Matthew 4:8, he shows Him all the kingdoms of the earth as his own, then you are admitting that he was never overthrown and that justice has never reigned.
Daniel 7:23 prophesies a fourth kingdom that devours the whole earth. And in Revelation 13:2, it is the dragon who gives that empire his throne and his authority. But the decisive point comes in Revelation 12:9: only at the end is the dragon defeated. Until then, he and his angels—a word that simply means messengers—deceive the whole world.
Then an unavoidable question arises: did you really expect that this deception would not be embedded in the very books that the elites of his kingdom present as sacred?
If Satan rules, then his lie is the official word of his empire, and his books are the ones upon which oaths are sworn. And the false liberating movement serves as a smokescreen. It speaks of awakening, but never points to the dogmas that keep the righteous asleep and on their knees, making them believe that the wicked—whether or not he kneels beside them before the same symbols—is not wicked, but simply someone who needs to awaken.»
[Satan]: «Did you know that the brick in my wall has six sides? A cube has six sides. And if I unfold the cube, I can form a cross with six squares. With 666, everything fits together so that you fall into line to…»
[The Deceived]: «Time to kneel.»
[Narrator]:
«If the ritual continues, there has been no awakening. They tell you to awaken, to break the system, to stop being a zombie. They tell you that you’ve already opened your eyes and that you are now one of the few who think for themselves. But if you look closely, you will discover the contradiction: the supposed messenger of freedom wears on his chest the very same symbol of the dogma he claims to fight.»
If the dragon gives his throne and authority to the fourth empire (Revelation 13:2), and his messengers deceive the whole world (Revelation 12:9), then it is logically inconsistent to assume that the books which that same empire preserves, promotes, finances, and requires its rulers to swear upon have somehow remained free from the official lie. If Satan rules, then the word that his empire imposes and spreads globally is the official word of his own kingdom.
The direct translation of the Greek term ángelos is simply «messenger.» Once the text is stripped of its traditional mythological framework, the empire’s true agents are revealed: ideologues, emissaries, and media propagators tasked with spreading the system’s message and ensuring the ideological submission of the masses.
The character of the false liberator—or false dissident—does not seek to break the ritual, but rather to channel the discontent of those who attempt to question the system. He criticizes governments, the economy, or the visible media in order to project an image of critical thinking and a genuine search for freedom, but he never directs that questioning toward the books that the kingdom itself regards as sacred, nor toward the symbolic geometry upon which the empire rests. His function is not to break the cycle, but to redirect the protest so that the ritual remains intact: the rhetoric changes, but the knee remains on the ground.


Giving idols divine names does not make them less useless, deaf, mute, and blind. The truth is stranger than we imagined. The meat reveals what the disguise hides. The wolf disguises itself as a lamb, but cannot hide its hunger for meat. , BAC 86 89 67[46] , 0006
│ English │ #HOGE
Why do the teachings of Cleobulus appear as gospels in the Bible? What kind of scam is this? (Video language:English) /28/ https://youtu.be/G7ap7MAb50M,
Day 151
«Show your true power» — Zeus challenges Gabriel. (Video language:Polish) /177/ https://youtu.be/CshBDp3EUew
«Let us analyze the infographic that analyzes and criticizes the visual and slanderous message against the saints.
Neither Gabriel was sent to defend Sodom, nor was Michael sent to defend the Roman Empire; therefore, that Roman legionary is not Michael, nor is that long-haired man with feminine poses and clothing Gabriel… that is not how Lot’s friends are. If the Roman Empire did not respect the holy messengers, nor does its remnant show respect for them today, do you really think they ever defended the true message to which they were hostile while respecting it in its integrity?
Let us analyze the infographic that analyzes and criticizes the visual and slanderous message against the saints:
Pink circles (idolatrous institution):Prayer to an image and payment for protection are imposed, appropriating divine authority and labeling as ‘Satan’ anyone who does not submit.
Blue circles (response):This practice is denounced as idolatry and as a violation of God’s law. The institution is accused of profiting from faith, giving cover to the unjust, and deceiving people with a false divine protection. In addition, its supposed spiritual authority is questioned and ridiculed, highlighting inconsistencies with what it claims to defend.
Key clarification:The criticism is not a blind defense of everything called ‘law,’ because it is also argued that this law has been manipulated; the denunciation points both to idolatry and to the corruption of the message itself.
Closing:The reaction of anger fits the denounced pattern: truth is rejected, the righteous are slandered, and the message is distorted in order to maintain power.
Pink circles: The god Mars worshiped by the Roman Empire:
1: Accept God and pray to this image (B). If you want protection, hire my services and direct your prayers to me like this: ‘Prince of the heavenly host, we beg you to protect us from evil…’.
2: If you are against me, you are Satan, because I am with God.
Blue circles: The adversary of the god Mars:
1: Silence, usurper. It is written in Exodus 20:5: ‘You shall not honor any image.’ Praying to you would be treating you as a god, and it is written in Exodus 20:3: ‘You shall have no other gods except Jehovah.’
2: There is no god comparable to the one who made all the other gods. According to Psalm 82, Jehovah stands among the gods, condemning those who welcome the unjust; but the institution you defend opens its doors to all of them, because through your idols your servants seek the money that the unjust pay in order to feel that they are protected by God.
3: You say that you are the prince of the heavenly host. Have you looked at yourself in the mirror (A)? Are they your followers (C)? Do you come to defend Sodom or to defend the righteous? Do you truly believe that God is on your side, or in your desperation do you slander those whom God will indeed save? Deuteronomy 22:5: ‘A woman shall not wear a man’s clothing, nor shall a man put on a woman’s garment; for whoever does these things is an abomination to Jehovah your God.’

Daniel 12:1 At that time Michael shall stand up…

Psalms 41:10 But you, Jehovah, have mercy on me, and raise me up, that I may repay them.
Proverbs 21:31 The horse is prepared for the day of battle, but victory belongs to Jehovah.
Psalms 41:11 By this I will know that you are pleased with me, because my enemy does not triumph over me.

You became enraged… In the same way, the persecutors of the empire you serve became enraged against the truth; that is why they denied the law of an eye for an eye, falsely accusing their victims and the prophets of their people of having denied it.
Isaiah 42:1 Behold my servant, whom I uphold; my chosen one, in whom my soul delights…
Psalms 112:10 The wicked shall see it and be grieved; he shall gnash his teeth and melt away. The desire of the wicked shall perish.

When the Empire calls the adversaries of the saints ‘saints,’ the empire and those close to it tell another story…


«
«In Mark 3:29, the ‘sin against the Holy Spirit’ is warned as unforgivable. However, history and the practices of Rome reveal a shocking moral inversion: the truly unforgivable sin, according to their dogma, is questioning the credibility of their Bible. Meanwhile, serious crimes such as the killing of innocents have been ignored or justified under the same authority that claimed to be infallible. This post examines how this ‘unique sin’ was constructed and how the institution used it to protect its power while justifying historical injustices.
In purposes contrary to Christ is the Antichrist, if you read Isaiah 11 you will see the mission of Christ in his second life, and it is not to favor everyone but only the righteous, but the Antichrist is inclusive, despite being unjust, he wants to climb onto Noah’s Ark, despite being unjust he wants to leave Sodom with Lot… Happy are those to whom these words are not offensive. He who is not offended by this message, that one is righteous, congratulations to him: Christianity was created by the Romans, only a mind friendly to celibacy, proper of Greek and Roman leaders, enemies of the ancient Jews, could conceive a message like the one that says: ‘These are the ones who did not defile themselves with women, for they remained virgins. They follow the Lamb wherever he goes. They were purchased from among mankind and offered as firstfruits to God and to the Lamb’ in Revelation 14:4, or a message like this one which is similar: ‘For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like the angels of God in heaven,’ in Matthew 22:30, both messages sound as if they came from a Roman Catholic priest, and not from a prophet of God who seeks this blessing for himself: He who finds a wife finds what is good and receives favor from the Lord (Proverbs 18:22), Leviticus 21:14 A widow, or a divorced woman, or a woman who has been defiled, or a prostitute, he shall not marry; but he shall take as a wife a virgin from his own people.
I am not Christian; I am henotheist. I believe in one supreme God above all, and I believe that several created gods exist—some faithful, others deceivers. I only pray to the supreme God. But since I was indoctrinated from childhood in Roman Christianity, I believed in its teachings for many years. I applied those ideas even when common sense told me otherwise. For example—so to speak—I turned the other cheek to a woman who had already struck me on one. A woman who, at first, acted like a friend, but then, without justification, began treating me as if I were her enemy, with strange and contradictory behavior. Influenced by the Bible, I believed she had become an enemy because of some spell, and that what she needed was prayer to return to being the friend she had once shown herself to be (or pretended to be). But in the end, everything only got worse. As soon as I had the chance to dig deeper, I uncovered the lie and felt betrayed in my faith. I came to understand that many of those teachings did not come from the true message of justice, but from Roman Hellenism infiltrated into the Scriptures. And I confirmed I had been deceived. That’s why I now denounce Rome and its fraud. I do not fight against God, but against the slanders that have corrupted His message. Proverbs 29:27 declares that the righteous hates the wicked. However, 1 Peter 3:18 claims that the righteous died for the wicked. Who can believe that someone would die for those he hates? To believe it is to have blind faith; it is to accept incoherence. And when blind faith is preached, could it be because the wolf wants his prey not to see the deception?
Jehovah will shout like a mighty warrior: ‘I will take vengeance on My enemies!’
(Revelation 15:3 + Isaiah 42:13 + Deuteronomy 32:41 + Nahum 1:2–7)
And what about the so-called ‘love for the enemy’ that, according to some Bible verses, the Son of Jehovah supposedly preached—claiming we should imitate His Father’s perfection through universal love? (Mark 12:25–37, Psalm 110:1–6, Matthew 5:38–48)
That is a lie spread by the enemies of both Father and Son.
A false doctrine born from mixing Hellenism with sacred words.»

1 San Pedro rechazó la adoración a su persona… ¿y los Papas que dicen ser sus sucesores? https://depuracion-del-mensaje.blogspot.com/2026/04/san-pedro-rechazo-la-adoracion-su.html 2 Religia pe care o apăr se numește dreptate. https://144k.xyz/2026/07/06/religia-pe-care-o-apar-se-numeste-dreptate/ 3 هغه سیاره چې د خپلو دوو سپوږمیو لخوا وخوړل شوه https://144k.xyz/2026/06/30/%d9%87%d8%ba%d9%87-%d8%b3%db%8c%d8%a7%d8%b1%d9%87-%da%86%db%90-%d8%af-%d8%ae%d9%be%d9%84%d9%88-%d8%af%d9%88%d9%88-%d8%b3%d9%be%d9%88%da%96%d9%85%db%8c%d9%88-%d9%84%d8%ae%d9%88%d8%a7-%d9%88%d8%ae%d9%88/ 4 La idea de que «los crímenes prescriben» es uno de los elementos que más impunidad genera. https://ellameencontrara.com/2026/05/28/la-idea-de-que-los-crimenes-prescriben-es-uno-de-los-elementos-que-mas-impunidad-genera/ 5 Người đàn ông Gabriel phơi bày sự mâu thuẫn trong thông điệp của Zeus: ‘Phúc cho những ai khao khát công lý, miễn là họ quên “mắt đền mắt” và yêu kẻ thù của công lý.’ https://gabriels.work/2026/05/07/nguoi-dan-ong-gabriel-phoi-bay-su-mau-thuan-trong-thong-diep-cua-zeus-phuc-cho-nhung-ai-khao-khat-cong-ly-mien-la-ho-quen-mat-den-mat-va-yeu-ke-thu-cua-cong-ly/

«The Ships Arrived Before the Fire | A Science Fiction Story Inspired by Ancient Texts.
‘The following is a science fiction story and philosophical reflection set in a distant world… very similar to our own. Any resemblance to past, present, or future realities of Earth is part of the imagination.’
On a world similar to Earth, in a distant galaxy, the human society there was very much like the one on Earth; just as one mandarin resembles another, so that world resembled ours.
And so, they had a book very similar to the Bible that said:
‘Revelation 19:19: I saw the beast and the kings of the earth gathered together to confront the righteous who ride white horses…’
Their book also said:
‘2 Peter 3:7: But the heavens and the earth which now exist are reserved by the same word, kept for fire on the day of judgment and destruction of ungodly men.’
The scattered righteous read the book, read messages like that, and reasoned and asked themselves:
‘If the unjust are condemned to perish, are they not condemned by their inability to live in peace with one another?’
‘If they wage wars, is it just that they force others to fight them?’
‘If they launch atomic bombs, is it just that peaceful people must suffer the radiation?’
‘That is like being a non-smoker on a bus full of smokers, suffering because of others.’
‘How could it be possible that a righteous man would have asked people to love their enemies, if it is the enemies of the righteous who destroy the earth?’
‘That seems like an adulterated message.’
‘Doesn’t it say here that God does not love them?’
‘How would His faithful messenger say otherwise?’
Indeed, that book said:
‘Revelation 11:18: The nations were angry, and Your wrath has come, and the time to judge the dead, and to reward Your servants the prophets, the saints, and those who fear Your name, both small and great, and to destroy those who destroy the earth.’
Then they understood that, if their world was doomed, God would send ships to rescue them.
And so it happened.
But it was not in their Bible.
That was not written in their Bible.
But they were discerning; they had the intelligence to understand that the same ones who adulterated the original message also concealed something like that.
But they did not conceal everything, because God did not allow it.
God allowed clues so that the discerning would understand that, if there are chosen ones, God’s love was never universal:
‘Matthew 24:22: And unless those days were shortened, no one would be saved; but for the sake of the elect, those days will be shortened.’

«
«Truth versus Dogma: The Trap of Dogma.
The word dogma comes from the Greek δόγμα (dógma), which means approximately: ‘that which has been decided,’ ‘decree,’ ‘established opinion,’ or ‘that which must be accepted.’It does not mean truth.
What is a dogma, really, and why can it become a trap for critical thinking?In this video, we reflect on the impact of dogmas on personal and social life through a story of introspection, maturity, and the search for truth beyond imposed beliefs.
When I was just over twenty years old, I found myself trapped between the manipulation of a woman… and a religious message that I believed was genuine.She would say to me: ‘I don’t know what’s wrong with me… I don’t know why I treat you so badly… Don’t stop looking for me, even if I insult you. Save me!’Meanwhile, the dogma kept telling me: ‘Pray for her. Follow our instructions. Only then can she be delivered from evil.’
Years passed before I realized that message was not the truth, but part of a dogma.And a dogma does not cease to be a dogma just because millions believe it.
Then I understood something even more important: no dogma protects the righteous.Dogmas protect the unrighteous because they convince the righteous to endure what was never their duty or their salvation… and what was never just or necessary to endure.
Today I am over fifty years old.And if I speak about my past, it is to seek justice, so that other righteous people will not be deceived by dogma as I was.
Matthew 12: The Attempt to Use Isaiah 42 as Propaganda:
Dogma tells us that Jesus performed miracles and instructed people to remain silent ‘that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by Isaiah the prophet’ (Matthew 12), that is, so that Isaiah 42 would be fulfilled in him.But Isaiah 42 does not speak only of discretion; it speaks of justice being established on the earth.
‘By means of the truth he will bring forth justice.’
‘He will not grow faint nor be discouraged until he has established justice in the earth.’
Then the question becomes inevitable:
Does justice reign on the earth?
No.
Reality refutes the dogma.Matthew 12 uses Isaiah 42 as a religious seal, but the justice that Isaiah proclaims has not been fulfilled.The text is used as propaganda, not as verified truth.
Truth versus Deception: Daniel 8:25 vs. Isaiah 42:
Daniel 8:25 describes with surgical precision how dogma operates:
‘Through his cunning he shall cause deceit to prosper in his hand; he shall magnify himself in his heart, and without warning he shall destroy many…’
Cunning, deception, silent destruction, manipulation that confuses even the righteous.That is the mechanism of dogma: it prospers through deception, not through truth.
In contrast, Isaiah 42 describes how truth operates:
‘By means of the truth he will bring forth justice.’
Truth brings justice, establishes it, upholds it, and defends it.Truth sets the righteous free from the deception denounced in Daniel 8:25.
Isaiah 42 has not been fulfilled; Daniel 8:25 has.Reality is on the side of the warning, not of the dogma.
Selective Justice:
Daniel 12:1: ‘At that time Michael, the great prince, shall stand up… There shall be a time of distress such as never has been… but at that time your people shall be delivered, everyone who is found written in the book.’
John 8:32: ‘And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.’
Proverbs 11:8: ‘The righteous is delivered out of trouble, and the wicked comes in his place.’
Psalm 118:20: ‘This is the gate of Jehovah; the righteous shall enter through it.’
These four passages form a selective message addressed only to the righteous, yet the Roman framework contradicts it by teaching that ‘Christ died for sinners’ (Romans 5:8), that ‘all have sinned and all are justified’ (Romans 3:23–24), that ‘God desires all people to be saved’ (1 Timothy 2:4), that the unrighteous should be forgiven (Luke 23:34), and that even the enemies of the righteous should be loved (Matthew 5:44; Proverbs 29:27; Genesis 3:15). Thus, the universalism and Hellenism introduced by Rome erase the distinction between the righteous person who may sin through deception and the unrighteous person who sins by nature, destroying the righteous message in which only the righteous are delivered, purified, protected, and admitted through the gate.
It would be unwise to assume that this infiltration affects only the books attributed to Jesus or to the saints persecuted by the Roman Empire, and not the older writings.
«
«The religion I defend is named justice. █
I will find her when she finds me, and she will believe what I say.
The Roman Empire has betrayed humanity by inventing religions to subjugate it. All institutionalized religions are false. All the sacred books of those religions contain frauds. However, there are messages that make sense. And there are others, missing, that can be deduced from the legitimate messages of justice. Daniel 12:1-13 — ‘The prince who fights for justice will rise to receive God’s blessing.’ Proverbs 18:22 — ‘A wife is the blessing God gives to a man.’ Leviticus 21:14 — ‘He must marry a virgin of his own faith, for she is from his own people, who will be set free when the righteous rise.’
📚 What is an institutionalized religion? An institutionalized religion is when a spiritual belief is transformed into a formal power structure, designed to control people. It ceases to be an individual search for truth or justice and becomes a system dominated by human hierarchies, serving political, economic, or social power. What is just, true, or real no longer matters. The only thing that matters is obedience. An institutionalized religion includes: Churches, synagogues, mosques, temples. Powerful religious leaders (priests, pastors, rabbis, imams, popes, etc.). Manipulated and fraudulent ‘official’ sacred texts. Dogmas that cannot be questioned. Rules imposed on people’s personal lives. Mandatory rites and rituals in order to ‘belong.’ This is how the Roman Empire, and later other empires, used faith to subjugate people. They turned the sacred into a business. And truth into heresy. If you still believe that obeying a religion is the same as having faith, you were lied to. If you still trust their books, you trust the same people who crucified justice. It’s not God speaking in his temples. It’s Rome. And Rome never stopped speaking. Wake up. He who seeks justice needs no permission. Nor an institution.
She will find me, the virgin woman will believe me.
( – – )
This is the wheat in the Bible that destroys the Roman tares in the Bible:
Revelation 19:11
Then I saw heaven opened, and there was a white horse; and the one sitting on it was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness, he judges and makes war.
Revelation 19:19
Then I saw the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies gathered together to make war against the one sitting on the horse and against his army.
Psalm 2:2-4
‘The kings of the earth set themselves up, and the rulers took counsel together against the Lord and against his anointed, saying:
‘Let us break their bonds apart and cast away their cords from us.’
He who sits in the heavens laughs; the Lord mocks them.’
Now, some basic logic: if the horseman fights for justice, but the beast and the kings of the earth fight against this horseman, then the beast and the kings of the earth are against justice. Therefore, they represent the deception of the false religions that rule with them.
The whore of Babylon, which is the false church made by Rome, has considered herself to be ‘the wife of the Lord’s anointed,’ but the false prophets of this idol-selling and flattering word-peddling organization do not share the personal goals of the Lord’s anointed and the true saints, because the ungodly leaders have chosen for themselves the path of idolatry, celibacy, or sacramentalizing unholy marriages in exchange for money. Their religious headquarters are full of idols, including false holy books, before which they bow down:
Isaiah 2:8-11
8 Their land is full of idols; they bow down to the work of their hands, to what their fingers have made.
9 So the man is humbled, and the man is brought low; do not forgive them.
10 Go into the rock, hide yourself in the dust from the terror of the LORD and from the splendor of his majesty.
11 The arrogance of human eyes will be brought low, and the pride of men will be humbled; the LORD alone will be exalted on that day.
Proverbs 19:14
House and wealth are an inheritance from fathers, but a prudent wife is from the LORD.
Leviticus 21:14
The priest of the LORD shall not marry a widow, nor a divorced woman, nor an unclean woman, nor a harlot; he shall take a virgin from his own people as a wife.
Revelation 1:6
And he has made us kings and priests to his God and Father; to him be glory and dominion forever.
1 Corinthians 11:7
The woman is the glory of man.
What does it mean in Revelation that the beast and the kings of the earth wage war on the rider of the white horse and his army?
The meaning is clear, the world leaders are hand in glove with the false prophets who are disseminators of the false religions that are dominant among the kingdoms of the earth, for obvious reasons, that includes Christianity, Islam, etc. These rulers are against justice and truth, which are the values defended by the rider of the white horse and his army loyal to God. As is evident, the deception is part of the false sacred books that these accomplices defend with the label of ‘Authorized Books of Authorized Religions’, but the only religion that I defend is justice, I defend the right of the righteous not to be deceived with religious deceptions.
Revelation 19:19 Then I saw the beast and the kings of the earth and their armies gathered together to make war against the rider on the horse and against his army.
Now some basic logic, if the horseman stands for justice, but the beast and the kings of the earth fight against this horseman, then the beast and the kings of the earth are against justice, therefore they stand for the deception of the false religions that rule with them.
This is my story:
José, a young man raised in Catholic teachings, experienced a series of events marked by complex relationships and manipulations. At 19, he began a relationship with Monica, a possessive and jealous woman. Although Jose felt that he should end the relationship, his religious upbringing led him to try to change her with love. However, Monica’s jealousy intensified, especially towards Sandra, a classmate who was making advances on Jose.
Sandra began harassing him in 1995 with anonymous phone calls, in which she made noises with the keyboard and hung up.
On one of those occasions, she revealed that she was the one calling, after Jose angrily asked in the last call: ‘Who are you?’ Sandra called him immediately, but in that call she said: ‘Jose, who am I?’ Jose, recognizing her voice, said to her: ‘You are Sandra,’ to which she replied: ‘You already know who I am.’ Jose avoided confronting her. During that time, Monica, obsessed with Sandra, threatened Jose with harming Sandra, which led Jose to protect Sandra and prolong his relationship with Monica, despite his desire to end it.
Finally, in 1996, Jose broke up with Monica and decided to approach Sandra, who had initially shown interest in him. When Jose tried to talk to her about his feelings, Sandra did not allow him to explain himself, she treated him with offensive words and he did not understand the reason. Jose chose to distance himself, but in 1997 he believed he had the opportunity to talk to Sandra, hoping that she would explain her change of attitude and be able to share the feelings that she had kept silent. On her birthday in July, he called her as he had promised a year earlier when they were still friends—something he couldn’t do in 1996 because he was with Monica. At the time, he used to believe that promises should never be broken (Matthew 5:34-37), though now he understands that some promises and oaths can be reconsidered if made in error or if the person no longer deserves them. As he finished greeting her and was about to hang up, Sandra desperately pleaded, ‘Wait, wait, can we meet?’ That made him think she had reconsidered and would finally explain her change in attitude, allowing him to share the feelings he had kept silent. However, Sandra never gave him clear answers, maintaining the intrigue with evasive and counterproductive attitudes.
Faced with this attitude, Jose decided not to look for her anymore. It was then that constant telephone harassment began. The calls followed the same pattern as in 1995 and this time were directed to the house of his paternal grandmother, where Jose lived. He was convinced that it was Sandra, since Jose had recently given Sandra his number. These calls were constant, morning, afternoon, night, and early morning, and lasted for months. When a family member answered, they did not hang up, but when José answered, the clicking of the keys could be heard before hanging up.
Jose asked his aunt, the owner of the telephone line, to request a record of incoming calls from the telephone company. He planned to use that information as evidence to contact Sandra’s family and express his concern about what she was trying to achieve with this behavior. However, his aunt downplayed his argument and refused to help. Strangely, no one in the house, neither his aunt nor his paternal grandmother, seemed to be outraged by the fact that the calls also occurred in the early morning, and they did not bother to look into how to stop them or identify the person responsible.
This had the strange appearance of orchestrated torture. Even when José asked his aunt to unplug the phone at night so he could sleep, she refused, arguing that one of her sons, who lived in Italy, could call at any moment (considering the six-hour time difference between the two countries). What made things even stranger was Monica’s fixation on Sandra, even though they hadn’t even met. Monica didn’t attend the high school where José and Sandra were enrolled, but she began to feel jealous of Sandra after finding a folder with one of José’s group projects. The folder listed the names of two women, including Sandra, but for some strange reason, Monica became fixated only on Sandra’s name.
Although José initially ignored Sandra’s phone calls, over time he relented and contacted Sandra again, influenced by biblical teachings that advised praying for those who persecuted him. However, Sandra manipulated him emotionally, alternating between insults and requests for him to keep looking for her. After months of this cycle, Jose discovered that it was all a trap. Sandra falsely accused him of sexual harassment, and as if that wasn’t bad enough, Sandra sent some criminals to beat up Jose.
That Tuesday, without José knowing it, Sandra had already set a trap for him.
Days before, José had told his friend Johan about the situation he was going through with Sandra. Johan also suspected that Sandra’s strange behavior might be due to some kind of witchcraft by Mónica. That Tuesday, José visited his old neighborhood where he had lived in 1995 and happened to run into Johan. After hearing more details about the situation, Johan recommended that José forget about Sandra and instead go out to a nightclub to meet women—perhaps he would find someone who could make him forget her. José thought it was a good idea.
So they got on a bus and headed toward the nightclub in downtown Lima. Coincidentally, the route of that bus passed near the IDAT institute. Just one block before reaching IDAT, José suddenly had the idea to get off for a moment to pay for a Saturday course he had enrolled in. He had managed to save some money for it by selling his computer and working for a week in a warehouse. However, he had been forced to quit because they exploited workers with 16-hour shifts while officially recording only 12, and if they refused to complete the week, they were threatened with not being paid at all.
So José turned to Johan and said, ‘I study here on Saturdays. Since we’re passing by, let’s get off for a bit, I’ll pay for my course, and then we’ll head to the nightclub.’
The moment José stepped off the bus, before even crossing the avenue, he was shocked to see Sandra standing right there on the corner of the institute. In disbelief, he told Johan, ‘Johan, I can’t believe it—Sandra is right there. She’s the girl I told you about, the one who acts so strangely. Wait for me here; I’m going to ask if she got the letter where I warned her about Mónica’s threats against her, and maybe she can finally explain what’s going on with her and what she wants from me with all her calls.’
Johan stayed back as José approached. But as soon as he started speaking—’Sandra, did you see the letters? Can you finally explain to me what’s going on with you?’—Sandra, without saying a word, gestured with her hand, signaling three thugs who had been hiding in different spots: one in the middle of the avenue, another behind Sandra, and another behind José.
The one standing behind Sandra stepped forward and said, ‘So you’re the sexual harasser who’s been bothering my cousin?’
José, caught off guard, responded, ‘What? Me, a harasser? On the contrary, she’s the one harassing me! If you read the letter, you’d see it’s about me trying to understand why she keeps calling me!’
Before he could react, one of the thugs grabbed him by the neck from behind and threw him to the ground. Then, together with the one who had claimed to be Sandra’s cousin, they started kicking him. Meanwhile, the third thug went through his pockets, robbing him. It was three against one—José, lying helpless on the pavement.
Luckily, his friend Johan jumped into the fight, managing to give José a chance to get up. But then the third thug picked up some rocks and started throwing them at both José and Johan.
The attack only stopped when a traffic officer intervened. The officer turned to Sandra and said, ‘If he’s harassing you, then file a complaint.’
Sandra, visibly nervous, quickly left, knowing full well that her accusation was false.
José, though deeply betrayed, did not go to the police. He had no way to prove the months of harassment he had suffered from Sandra. But beyond the shock of her betrayal, one question haunted him:
‘How did she already have this ambush set up when I never come to this place on Tuesday nights? I only come here to study on Saturday mornings.’
This made José suspect that Sandra wasn’t just an ordinary person—she might be a witch with some kind of supernatural power.
These events left a deep mark on Jose, who seeks justice and to expose those who manipulated him. In addition, he seeks to derail the advice in the Bible, such as: pray for those who insult you, because by following that advice, he fell into Sandra’s trap.
Jose’s testimony.
I am José Carlos Galindo Hinostroza, the author of the blog: https://gabriels.work
I was born in Peru, that photo is mine, it is from 1997, I was 22 years old.

At that time, I was entangled in the intrigues of Sandra Elizabeth, a former classmate from the IDAT institute. I was confused about what was happening to her (She harassed me in a very complex and extensive way to narrate in this image, but I narrate it at the bottom of this blog: and in this video:
). I did not rule out the possibility that Mónica Nieves, my ex-girlfriend, had done some witchcraft to her.
When searching for answers in the Bible, I read in Matthew 5:
‘ Pray for whoever insults you,’
And in those days, Sandra insulted me while telling me she didn’t know what was happening to her, that she wanted to continue being my friend, and that I should keep calling and looking for her again and again, and it went on like this for five months. In short, Sandra pretended to be possessed by something to keep me confused. The lies in the Bible made me believe that good people can behave evilly because of an evil spirit. That’s why the advice to pray for her didn’t seem so crazy to me—because before, Sandra pretended to be a friend, and I fell for her deception.
Thieves often use the strategy of pretending to have good intentions: To steal from stores, they pretend to be customers; to ask for tithes, they pretend to preach the word of God, but they preach that of Rome, etc., etc. Sandra Elizabeth pretended to be a friend, then pretended to be a friend in trouble looking for my help, but all to slander me and ambush me with three criminals, surely out of spite because a year earlier I rejected her advances since I was in love with Monica Nieves, to whom I was faithful. But Monica did not trust my fidelity and threatened to kill Sandra Elizabeth, which is why I broke up with Monica slowly, over eight months, so that Monica wouldn’t think it was because of Sandra. But this is how Sandra Elizabeth paid me back—with slander. She falsely accused me of sexually harassing her, and with that pretext, she ordered three criminals to beat me up—all in front of her.
I narrate all this in my blog and in my YouTube videos:
I do not wish for other righteous men to have bad experiences like I had, which is why I have created what you are reading. I know this will irritate unrighteous people like Sandra, but the truth is like the true gospel—it only favors the righteous.
The evil of José’s family overshadows Sandra’s evil:
José suffered a devastating betrayal by his own family, who not only refused to help him stop Sandra’s harassment but also falsely accused him of having a mental illness. His own relatives used these accusations as a pretext to kidnap and torture him, sending him twice to mental health institutions and a third time to a hospital.
It all began when José read Exodus 20:5 and stopped being Catholic. From that moment on, he became outraged by the Church’s dogmas and started protesting against its doctrines on his own. He also advised his relatives to stop praying to images and told them that he was praying for a friend (Sandra) who was apparently bewitched or possessed. José was under stress due to the harassment, but his relatives did not tolerate him exercising his freedom of religious expression. As a result, they destroyed his professional life, his health, and his reputation by locking him up in mental institutions where he was given sedatives.
Not only was he forcibly institutionalized, but after his release, he was forced to continue taking psychiatric medication under the threat of being locked up again. He fought to break free from those chains, and during the last two years of that injustice, with his programming career ruined, he was forced to work without pay at his uncle’s restaurant. That same uncle betrayed his trust by secretly drugging his meals with psychiatric pills. José only discovered the truth in 2007 thanks to a kitchen assistant named Lidia, who warned him about what was happening.
From 1998 to 2007, José lost nearly ten years of his youth due to his treacherous relatives. In hindsight, he realized that his mistake was defending the Bible to reject Catholicism, as his family never allowed him to read it. They committed this injustice knowing he had no financial resources to defend himself. When he finally broke free from the forced medication, he thought he had earned their respect. His maternal uncles and cousins even offered him a job, but years later, they betrayed him again with such hostility that he was forced to resign. This made him realize that he should never have forgiven them, as their bad intentions were clear.
From that moment on, he decided to study the Bible again, and in 2017, he began noticing its contradictions. Little by little, he understood why God had allowed his relatives to prevent him from defending the Bible in his youth. He discovered biblical inconsistencies and started exposing them in his blogs, where he also recounted the story of his faith and the suffering he endured at the hands of Sandra and, most of all, his own family.
For this reason, in December 2018, his mother attempted to kidnap him again with the help of corrupt police officers and a psychiatrist who issued a false certificate. They accused him of being a ‘dangerous schizophrenic’ to have him institutionalized again, but the attempt failed because he was not home. There were witnesses to the incident, and José had audio recordings, which he presented as evidence to the Peruvian authorities in his complaint, but it was dismissed.
His family knew perfectly well that he was not insane—he had a stable job, a child, and the mother of his child to take care of. However, despite knowing the truth, they attempted to kidnap him again using the same old false accusation. His own mother and other fanatical Catholic relatives led the attempt. Although his complaint was ignored by the Ministry, José exposes these truths in his blogs, making it clear that the evil of his family eclipses even that of Sandra.
Here is the evidence of the kidnappings using the slander of traitors:
‘This man is a schizophrenic who urgently needs psychiatric treatment and pills for life.’







I have been a computer programmer, I like logic, in Turbo Pascal I created a program capable of producing basic algebra formulas at random, similar to the formula below. In the following document in .PDF you can download the code of the program, this is proof that I’m not stupid, that’s why the conclusions of my research should be taken seriously. https://ntiend.me/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/math21.pdf
If k/19=83.46 then k=1585.74 «Cupid is condemned to hell along with the other pagan gods (The fallen angels for their rebellion against justice, sent to eternal punishment). █
Quoting these passages does not mean defending the entire Bible. If 1 John 5:19 says that “the whole world is under the power of the evil one,” but rulers swear on the Bible, then the Devil rules with them. If the Devil rules with them, then fraud also rules with them. Therefore, the Bible contains part of that fraud, camouflaged among truths. By connecting those truths, we can expose their deceptions. Righteous people need to know these truths so that, if they have been deceived by lies added to the Bible or other similar books, they can free themselves from them.
Daniel 12:7 And I heard the man clothed in linen, who was above the waters of the river, when he raised his right hand and his left hand to heaven and swore by Him who lives forever that it shall be for a time, times, and half a time. And when the power of the holy people is completely shattered, all these things shall be finished.
Considering that ‘Devil’ means ‘Slanderer,’ it is natural to expect that the Roman persecutors, being the adversaries of the saints, later bore false witness against the saints and their messages. Thus, they themselves are the Devil, and not an intangible entity that enters and exits people, as they made us believe precisely with passages like Luke 22:3 (“Then Satan entered Judas…”), Mark 5:12-13 (the demons entering the pigs), and John 13:27 (“After the morsel, Satan entered him”).
This is my purpose: to help righteous people not waste their power believing in the lies of impostors who have adulterated the original message, which never asked anyone to kneel before anything or pray to anything that had ever been visible.
It is no coincidence that in this image, promoted by the Roman Church, Cupid appears alongside other pagan gods. They have given the names of the true saints to these false gods, but look at how these men dress and how they wear their long hair. All this goes against faithfulness to God’s laws because it is a sign of rebellion, a sign of the fallen angels (Deuteronomy 22:5).
The serpent, the devil, or Satan (the slanderer) in hell (Isaiah 66:24, Mark 9:44). Matthew 25:41: “Then he will also say to those on his left: ‘Depart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire that has been prepared for the devil and his angels’.” Hell: the eternal fire prepared for the serpent and his angels (Revelation 12:7-12), for having combined truths with heresies in the Bible, the Quran, the Torah, and for having created false forbidden gospels that they called apocryphal, to give credibility to lies in the false sacred books, all in rebellion against justice.
Book of Enoch 95:6: “Woe to you, false witnesses and to those who weigh the price of injustice, for you will perish suddenly!” Book of Enoch 95:7: “Woe to you, unjust ones who persecute the righteous, for you yourselves will be handed over and persecuted because of that injustice, and the burden of your guilt will fall upon you!” Proverbs 11:8: “The righteous is delivered from trouble, and the wicked comes in his place.” Proverbs 16:4: “The Lord has made all things for Himself, even the wicked for the day of doom.”
Book of Enoch 94:10: “Unjust ones, I say to you that He who created you will overthrow you; upon your ruin, God will have no mercy, but rather, God will rejoice in your destruction.” Satan and his angels in hell: the second death. They deserve it for lying against Christ and His faithful disciples, accusing them of being the authors of Rome’s blasphemies in the Bible, such as love for the devil (the enemy).
Isaiah 66:24: “And they shall go out and look upon the corpses of the men who have rebelled against me; for their worm shall never die, nor shall their fire be quenched, and they shall be abhorrent to all flesh.” Mark 9:44: “Where their worm does not die, and the fire is never quenched.” Revelation 20:14: “Then Death and Hades were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death: the lake of fire.”


The wolf wants the righteous to say he is also evil… that way he can keep feeding among them without being exposed.
Word of Satan: ‘Forget the woman; the glory of man is in bowing before me, with long hair, eternally my angels, obedient and devoted.’
The false prophet wants everyone so he can take everyone’s money; the true prophet only wants to alert the just to the deception.
The lamb and the wolf disguised as a lamb react differently when offered meat.
Word of Satan: ‘Sheep, follow my example: my flesh is your bread, my blood is your wine, and when a wolf comes, tell him, I am your bread and your wine, I love my enemy and I give it to him.’
Word of Satan: ‘The wolf you welcome as a sheep will forget to seek meat and begin to bleat with endearing clumsiness.’
Rome did not destroy the altars of Jupiter; it only changed the name on the plaque. A system that demands bowing before an image and praying to an intermediary is not monotheism; it is Roman polytheism with a new administrative mask.
Word of Satan: ‘Forget revenge, for the wicked always win… And remember: every justice you demand in this life is a sin; and every evil you accept by offering your other cheek, a virtue for the next life… in which I will tell you the same.’
They declare war from desks, others pay with their lives.
Word of Zeus(Jupiter): ‘Rome proclaims it no longer worships me, that it now follows the religion of the one who denied me. And yet, its face is mine, its path demands love for me… though I am the enemy!’

موت کے کنارے تاریک راستے پر چلتے ہوئے، مگر روشنی کی تلاش میں وہ پہاڑوں پر منعکس ہونے والی روشنیوں کی تعبیر کرتا تھا تاکہ غلط قدم اٹھانے سے بچ سکے، تاکہ موت سے بچ سکے۔ https://144k.xyz/2026/07/05/%d9%85%d9%88%d8%aa-%da%a9%db%92-%da%a9%d9%86%d8%a7%d8%b1%db%92-%d8%aa%d8%a7%d8%b1%db%8c%da%a9-%d8%b1%d8%a7%d8%b3%d8%aa%db%92-%d9%be%d8%b1-%da%86%d9%84%d8%aa%db%92-%db%81%d9%88%d8%a6%db%92%d8%8c-%d9%85/
সান্দ্রা এবং শয়তানের কণ্ঠস্বর। https://antibestia.com/2026/07/22/%e0%a6%b8%e0%a6%be%e0%a6%a8%e0%a7%8d%e0%a6%a6%e0%a7%8d%e0%a6%b0%e0%a6%be-%e0%a6%8f%e0%a6%ac%e0%a6%82-%e0%a6%b6%e0%a6%af%e0%a6%bc%e0%a6%a4%e0%a6%be%e0%a6%a8%e0%a7%87%e0%a6%b0-%e0%a6%95%e0%a6%a3/
Giving idols divine names does not make them less useless, deaf, mute, and blind. The truth is stranger than we imagined. The meat reveals what the disguise hides. The wolf disguises itself as a lamb, but cannot hide its hunger for meat.»
«This explains a lot. The righteous do not ask for silence in the face of evil: they expose the wolves. A mute idol and a loud prophet—guess which one steals your life.
The Pope: successor of the Caesars or of Saint Peter? //50
With double burden and double mile? «Come to me, all who are weary, and I will give you rest.» //253
The Prophecies of Isaiah That Challenge the Religions Created Through Deception by the Roman Empire //248
The Judas Betrayal and the Long-Haired Jesus: Two Lies Exposed //47
Proverbs 18:22: ‘He who finds a wife finds a good thing and obtains favor from the Lord.’ Genesis 2:18–24: ‘It is not good that man should be alone; I will make a woman for him to accompany him.’ Supposed statements of Paul: ‘It is good for a man not to touch a woman,’ ‘I wish that all men were as I am.’ (1 Corinthians 7:1,7). Should we believe that Paul denied the truth, or rather that Rome put words in his mouth? //85

Malachi 4:1 … and all the proud and all who do wickedness will be stubble… 2 But to you who fear my name, the Sun of righteousness shall arise, and in its wings shall be salvation… 3 You shall trample the wicked, for they shall be ashes under the soles of your feet… 4 Remember the law of Moses… That law forbids making images of the sun for worship (Deuteronomy 4:15–20). But Rome altered many laws and many prophecies (Daniel 7:25). The expression ‘the Sun of righteousness’ is not an invitation or approval to create images of the sun for worship; it is an expression that justice will shine like the sun, just as the righteous will shine like the sun when justice shines: when the wicked are trampled, then the righteous will rejoice; there is no love for the wicked here, because love for the wicked is a slander of the wicked; they put words in the mouth of the righteous that he never said. Psalm 58:10 ‘The righteous shall rejoice when he sees the vengeance…’ Because Jesus never died for the forgiveness of the sins of the wicked but for the forgiveness of the sins of the righteous: Micah 7:8 ‘Do not rejoice over me, my enemy; though I have fallen, I will rise… I will bear the indignation of Jehovah, because I have sinned against Him, until He pleads my case and executes justice for me…’ Matthew 13:42 ‘And they will cast the wicked into the furnace of fire; there will be wailing and gnashing of teeth.’ 43 Then the righteous will shine like the sun in the kingdom of their Father. Psalm 118:18 ‘Jehovah has chastened me severely (for my sins), but He has not given me over to death (because of the covenant in favor of the righteous).’ 19 ‘Open to me the gates of righteousness; I will enter through them…’ 20 ‘This is the gate of Jehovah; the righteous shall enter through it.’ //142

«