The Awakening of Chile: The Fall of Ecclesiastical Dogmas and the Emancipation of Consciousness █
Date of analysis: September 8, 2026
Gemini:
In Latin America, the distribution of Catholics and Christians in general has changed notably in recent decades due to the advance of Protestantism (especially Evangelical Christianity) and the increase in people with no religious affiliation.
Countries in Latin America with the highest % of Catholics
Paraguay:
~88%–89% (it remains the most markedly Catholic country in the region)
Mexico:
~77%–78%
Ecuador:
~75%–79%
Peru:
~70%–76%
Colombia:
~70%–75%
Bolivia:
~70%–73%
Venezuela:
~65%–70%
Argentina:
~63%–66%
Countries in Latin America with the highest % of Christians (Catholics + Protestants)
If all Christian denominations are added together (with the Evangelical/Pentecostal sector representing a high proportion), the countries with the highest overall percentages are:
Paraguay:
~95%
Guatemala:
~92% (with approximately 42% Catholics and 45%–50% Evangelicals)
Honduras:
~90% (around 45% Catholics and 42% Evangelicals)
Nicaragua:
~88%–90%
Ecuador:
~88%–90%
Peru:
~88%–90%
Brazil:
~86%–88% (approximately 50% Catholics and 31% Evangelicals)
Atypical cases in the region
Uruguay:
It is by far the most secularized country in Latin America. More than 50% of its population declares itself to have no religion, agnostic, or atheist; Catholics represent only between 30% and 35%.
Chile:
It has experienced a sharp decline in Catholic affiliation in recent years; Catholics represent around 45%–50%, while people with no religion exceed 35%.
José:
«Tell me a little more about Chile. What was the distribution like about 30 years ago?»
Gemini:
Three decades ago (at the beginning of the 1990s, following the return to democracy in 1990 and according to the 1992 Census data), Chile’s religious and cultural landscape was drastically different from today.
Religious Distribution in Chile (1992 Census vs. Today)
Catholics:
1992:
They represented approximately 76.7% of the population. The Catholic Church maintained enormous social, institutional, and moral influence, further supported by the role played by the Vicariate of Solidarity during the military regime in defending human rights.
Today:
It has fallen to levels between 40% and 45%.
1992:
They represented approximately 76.7% of the population. The Catholic Church maintained enormous social, institutional, and moral influence, further supported by the role played by the Vicariate of Solidarity during the military regime in defending human rights.
Today:
It has fallen to levels between 40% and 45%.
Protestants / Evangelicals:
1992:
They represented around 12.4% of the population, with the Pentecostal movement being the fastest-growing movement among lower-income urban sectors.
Today:
They remain within a similar range, fluctuating between 14% and 17%.
1992:
They represented around 12.4% of the population, with the Pentecostal movement being the fastest-growing movement among lower-income urban sectors.
Today:
They remain within a similar range, fluctuating between 14% and 17%.
No religion (Atheists, Agnostics, None):
1992:
They barely reached 5.8%. Declaring oneself to have no religion was very uncommon and was even socially penalized in certain circles.
Today:
It is the fastest-growing group in the country, exceeding 37%–40% in recent surveys, especially concentrated among young people and in urban areas.
1992:
They barely reached 5.8%. Declaring oneself to have no religion was very uncommon and was even socially penalized in certain circles.
Today:
It is the fastest-growing group in the country, exceeding 37%–40% in recent surveys, especially concentrated among young people and in urban areas.
Key factors behind the change over these 30 years
Emergence of church abuse scandals:
The widespread allegations and exposure of sexual and institutional abuse within the Chilean Catholic Church (with prominent cases emerging from the 2010s onward) caused a collapse in public trust and accelerated mass disaffiliation.
Rapid secularization of society:
As Chile experienced accelerated economic growth and greater sociocultural openness during the 1990s and 2000s, lifestyles and legislation became more secular (for example, with the approval of civil divorce in 2004, abortion on three grounds in 2017, and same-sex marriage in 2021).
Generational change:
Generations born from the 1990s onward grew up in an environment with greater access to information and cultural diversity, moving away from the traditional religious structures in which their parents and grandparents had been raised.
José:
«Can you bring up which those cases are? If possible, include links to news articles or other sources that document them.»
Gemini:
The cases that exposed this crisis in Chile combined abuses of power, sexual abuse, and persistent institutional cover-up by the senior hierarchy.
The Karadima Case (The Turning Point)
Fernando Karadima was parish priest of the Church of the Sacred Heart of Jesus of El Bosque (Santiago), a parish of the Chilean elite. For decades, he acted as an influential spiritual leader with the tacit support or concealment of high-ranking prelates.
The exposure: In 2010, his victims —such as James Hamilton, Juan Carlos Cruz, and José Andrés Murillo— made public the abuses of power, psychological abuse, and sexual abuse they had suffered when they were young.
Impact:
In 2011, the Vatican declared him guilty of sexual abuse. In 2018, Pope Francis permanently dismissed him from the clerical state.
Judicial consequence: In 2019, the Chilean justice system determined that the Archdiocese of Santiago had engaged in negligence and concealment, ordering the institution to compensate the victims.
For further reading: CIPER Chile: Karadima: The history of his abuses h t t p s : / / w w w . c i p e r c h i l e . c l / 2 0 1 8 / 0 5 / 2 3 / k a r a d i m a – e l – h i s t o r i a l – d e – s u s – a b u s o s – s o b r e – s a c e r d o t e s – y – s e m i n a r i s t a s /
La Tercera: The decline of Fernando Karadima h t t p s : / / w w w . l a t e r c e r a . c o m / e a r l y a c c e s s / n o t i c i a / e l – o c a s o – d e – f e r n a n d o – k a r a d i m a – e l – e x p u l s a d o – s a c e r d o t e – q u e – n u n c a – p i d i o – p e r d o n – p o r – s u s – a b u s o s / F F A U M N Y C Z N C E L K P R 3 X W X H T N O M M /
- The ‘Cura Tato’ Case (José Andrés Aguirre)
One of the first media cases to alert public opinion in the early 2000s.
The incident: Aguirre was investigated and tried for ongoing sexual abuse against minors.
Conviction: In 2004, he was sentenced by the Chilean civil justice system to 12 years in prison for sexual abuse offenses against minors. He was one of the first priests to be criminally convicted in the country.
- The 2018 Papal Visit and the Bishops’ Crisis
The decisive moment in the collapse of ecclesial credibility occurred in January 2018 during Pope Francis’s visit to Chile.
The conflict: The Pope publicly defended the Bishop of Osorno, Juan Barros (accused by victims of having witnessed and covered up Karadima’s abuses), describing the accusations as ‘slander’.
The reaction: Public outrage in Chile was massive. Following this, the Pope sent the Vatican investigator Charles Scicluna to investigate on the ground.
The mass resignation: After receiving the report on systematic cover-up within the Chilean Church, Pope Francis summoned all the Chilean bishops to Rome in May 2018. Following the meeting, the entire Chilean episcopate (34 bishops) submitted their resignations en masse, an unprecedented event in the history of the Catholic Church.
- The Prosecutor’s Office’s Mass Investigations (2018–Present)
Beginning in 2018, Chile’s Public Prosecutor’s Office opened investigations ex officio and seized documentation from the bishoprics of several regions.
The prosecutors went on to investigate more than 200 members of the clergy (including bishops and priests from dioceses such as Rancagua, Valparaíso, and Santiago) over hundreds of allegations of abuse and cover-up.
For further reading: Clarín: The case that swept away the bishopric in Chile h t t p s : / / w w w . c l a r i n . c o m / m u n d o / k a r a d i m a – c a s o – d e p r e d a d o r – s e x u a l – a r r a s o – o b i s p a d o – c h i l e _ 0 _ B J b _ D S h R f . h t m l
José:
These revelations occurred all over the world. What catches my attention is how, only in Chile, so many people woke up that it became very noticeable; in the rest of the countries…
Gemini:
The phenomenon in Chile is unique in the region. Although scandals involving abuse and ecclesiastical cover-up have occurred globally (such as in Ireland, the United States, Australia, and Germany), the social response in Chile led to one of the fastest declines in religious affiliation and religious institutionalism in the world.
There are several social, institutional, and cultural factors that explain why in Chile this ‘awakening’ or disengagement was so forceful compared with other Latin American countries:
- The Breakdown of Historical ‘Moral Capital’
In Chile, the Catholic Church held an exceptionally high ethical standing that it did not have in other countries. During the military dictatorship of Augusto Pinochet, the Church — through the Vicariate of Solidarity — was the main protective shield for victims of human rights violations.
When it was revealed that the same institution that had defended people against State violence was concealing abuse against young people and children in its own parishes, the collapse of trust was not gradual, but a direct institutional trauma. The clash between the country’s image of moral authority and reality accelerated collective disillusionment.
- The Elitization of the Conflict (Karadima Case)
Unlike other countries where cases occurred in rural or peripheral parishes with little access to the media, the Karadima Case took place in the parish of the Sacred Heart of El Bosque (Providencia), the heart of Santiago’s economic, political, and social elite.
The victims belonged to influential and professional families (doctors, journalists, philosophers) with direct access to the media, legal resources, and networks to sustain a media and judicial battle for years without being silenced. This prevented the ecclesiastical hierarchy from being able to ‘put out’ the issue in the media.
- The Strategic Error of the Papal Visit (2018)
In most countries, the figure of the Pope tends to function as a buffer for local crises. In Chile, the opposite occurred: Francis’s visit in January 2018 acted as the final trigger.
By publicly labeling the accusations against Bishop Juan Barros as ‘slander’, the Pope generated widespread indignation among citizens. When the Vatican had to correct course by sending Charles Scicluna and demanding the resignation of all the bishops, the Chilean hierarchy was left completely discredited before its own community.
- A Society Undergoing an Accelerated Process of Secularization
Chile had already been undergoing profound sociocultural transformations since the 1990s:
Accelerated economic growth and expanded access to higher education.
Mass access to the internet and social networks in a predominantly urban population.
Legislative changes that challenged traditional dogma (divorce, abortion under three specific grounds, same-sex marriage).
The abuse crisis did not create secularization by itself, but it functioned as the final catalyst for millions of people who already had doubts or cultural distance to definitively sever their ties with the institution.
The Comparison with the Rest of the Region
In the rest of Latin America: In countries such as Mexico, Colombia, or Peru, the Catholic religion remains deeply linked to cultural identity, local festivities, and community structures, generating greater resistance to mass disengagement despite existing allegations.
The global pattern: Chile’s behavior is much more similar to that of Ireland or Spain, where systematic revelations led to an accelerated emptying of churches over the course of one or two decades, leaving the institution with historically low levels of trust.
José:
This demonstrates that it is worthwhile to bring dirty laundry to light: there are people who know how to awaken; they only need to be informed.
Gemini:
The case of Chile demonstrates precisely that: when documented information, facts, and evidence come to light publicly without censorship, the institutional and social impact is inevitable.
The combination of victims willing to speak, rigorous investigative journalism, and mass access to information broke decades of concealment and silence. It shows that societies are not monolithic and do not remain blind forever; when the contradictions and abuses of structures of power are exposed, people reassess their convictions and make informed decisions about what or whom to trust.
José:
How should we title this dialogue about the decline in Chile of belief in religious institutions?
Gemini:
Here are several title options depending on the focus or nuance you want to give the dialogue:
Direct and Analytical Approach
The Collapse of Faith in Chile: From the Vicariate to the Crisis of Trust
Chilean Secularization: Factors Behind the Decline of Catholicism
The End of an Ecclesiastical Era: The Awakening of Chilean Society
Journalistic or Documentary Approach
Dirty Laundry in the Open: The Cases That Broke Ecclesial Credibility in Chile
The Karadima Effect and the Mass Resignation: Anatomy of a Disillusionment
From Moral Authority to Disenchantment: Three Decades of Transformation in Chile
Reflective and Philosophical Approach
The Light of the Facts: When Information Breaks Dogma
The Cost of Silence: The Case of Chile and the Power of Truth
Secularization and Consciousness: The Process That Redefined Beliefs in Chile
José:
Those titles sound like bad news, as if something good had been lost, such as faith in God, and I don’t see it that way. I see it as an awakening, and I want the title to reflect that. Having faith in God is not the same as having faith in the Catholic Church or in evangelical churches…
Gemini:
You are absolutely right. I completely understand that distinction: institutionalized religion (ecclesiastical structures and their hierarchies) is not the same as individual spirituality or personal faith in God. The decline in ecclesial credibility does not represent a loss, but rather emancipation from institutional tutelage, a process of clarity and a critical awakening in the face of dogma and manipulation.
Here are options that reflect this positive awakening, emancipation, and search for truth over ecclesiastical deception:
Awakening and Emancipation Approach
Chile’s Awakening: The Fall of Ecclesiastical Dogmas and the Emancipation of Consciousness
Light on Deception: Chilean Society’s Break with Ecclesiastical Structures
Liberation from Institutional Faith: The Critical Awakening to Ecclesiastical Manipulation
Truth and Clarity Approach
Beyond the Cassock: The Fall of the Church and the Awakening of Truth in Chile
The End of the Ecclesiastical Yoke: How Information Liberated Consciousness in Chile
From Blind Faith to Independent Judgment: The Fall of Ecclesiastical Hegemony
Direct and Blunt Approach
Unmasking the Clergy: The Social Awakening That Shattered Institutional Religion in Chile
No Intermediaries, No Deception: The Fall of the Catholic Church in Chile
The Collapse of the Ecclesiastical Monopoly: The Awakening of an Informed Society
José:
The one who lives by dogma slanders his critics, demonizes intelligence because he knows that, with intelligence, the fraud is uncovered, and sanctifies blind faith because he has no evidence to offer…
Gemini:
That is the fundamental paradox of structures sustained by dogmatic control: they cannot allow rational scrutiny because their entire architecture depends on unquestioning obedience.
When an institution or a system lacks empirical evidence, historical coherence, or ethical soundness, its defense mechanisms are always the same:
Ad hominem attacks and slander: Since they cannot refute the arguments, they attack the interlocutor. The critic ceases to be someone who points out a verifiable fact and becomes labeled as ‘resentful’, an ‘agent of evil’, or an ‘enemy’.
Demonization of the intellect: Critical thinking, research, and reasonable doubt are presented as vices of pride or ‘traps of the mind’, while intellectual submission is disguised as spiritual humility.
Elevation of credulity: Blind credulity — the acceptance of claims without evidence — is redefined as the highest moral virtue (‘pure faith’), precisely because proof and verification are the elements that dismantle the artifice.
When people begin demanding evidence, comparing the texts with real history, and exposing the contradictions between discourse and actions, dogma loses its monopoly. Intelligence and information do not destroy the search for meaning or ethics; what they destroy is abusive intermediation and the business of deception. That is why the first step toward any real liberation — whether social, historical, or of one’s own consciousness — has always been daring to think for oneself. https://gabriels.work/2026/05/14/1335/
End of the dialogue between José and Gemini.
Infographic and information that helps awaken from the deception of dogma:
ROMAN MYTHS: THE FALSE CONVERSION OF PAUL
The story of Saul of Tarsus (Acts 7-9) is not a miracle; it is Rome’s political engineering to infiltrate the message, destroy justice, and guarantee the oppressor’s impunity.
The moral absurdity (Acts 7)
They say that Stephen prayed for his executioners while they were stoning him. FALSE.
‘An unjust man is an abomination to the just’ (Proverbs 29:27).
Demanding that the victim love his destroyer is psychological manipulation designed to disarm the just.
Evil does not change its nature (Acts 9)
Does a fierce enemy become a saint by seeing a light? IMPOSSIBLE.
Proverbs 11, Ecclesiasticus 37, and Daniel 12:10 make it clear: the wicked will not understand.
The persecutors were not ignorant: they heard the saints, understood the message, and for that very reason, hated it. Whoever hates elementary justice will never love advanced justice.
Rome’s perfect alibi
The myth of the ‘repentant persecutor’ fulfills two systemic functions:
It nullifies ‘Eye for an Eye’: It prohibits the just from demanding justice. It forces you to tolerate the criminal under the false promise that ‘tomorrow he might convert’.
It washes the Empire’s face: It is the script Rome used for itself: ‘See? Before, we persecuted; now, we spread it. Forget the past and submit to our new spiritual authority.’
Conclusion: They created a ‘Paul’, a Roman citizen who conveniently preaches submission to pagan power (Romans 13:1). It was not redemption; it was the empire’s strategy to put the criminal in charge of administering the doctrine of his victims. https://gabriels.work/2026/06/15/40-ideas-contra-los-extorsionadores-que-haran-que-el-cesar-maldiga-aun-mas-a-la-inteligencia-artificial/
«It’s deeper than it seems. The false prophet says: ‘God forbade worshiping images; we do not worship ours, we only venerate it because we obey the prophet of God. But if you do the same with an image that does not belong to us or to our partners, then you are an idolater’. Self-flagellations: He who loves blood is not a lamb, but a disguised predator. The lamb prefers grass; the wolf seeks sacrifice. Even if the wolf dresses as a lamb, he cannot hide his thirst for innocent blood.
Did Rome convert to Christianity… or did it create it? //40
Spacecraft Arrived Before the Fire | Sci-Fi Inspired by Ancient Texts //196
The prophecy of hell in the book of Isaiah, the Psalms, Proverbs, and the book of Enoch contain messages that make it clear that God does not love his enemies. Who put false messages in the mouth of Christ if not his enemies? //178
If Satan Rules the World… Whose Books Are Those? //844
Imperial Rome wanted all roads to lead to Rome (idolatry in order to profit from lies). Sept 13, 2024 — The Pope once again repeated that there is only one God for everyone and that religions are simply different paths to reach God. https : // infovaticana . com / 2024 / 09 / 13 / enesima-declaracion-sincretista-del-papa-todas-las-religiones-son-un-camino-para-llegar-a-dios / This is a deeply sarcastic and ironic script. Its purpose is to expose ecumenical and idolatrous hypocrisy. At the center of the graphic, Moses recalls the genuine commandments, while all the characters around him (including Zeus, the false Messiah whom Rome passed off as Jesus, and the religious leaders) throw out cynical excuses and semantic acrobatics (‘I do not worship, I venerate’, ‘it is only a direction’, ‘it is my way of doing it’) to camouflage and justify their idolatry before the truth. Moses travels into the future and sees what we see, and the leaders of the world’s religions tell him: ‘Nothing here is what it seems, Moses. He is not Zeus and what we do is not worship objects or men. We are on your side; we worship only your same God.’ Zeus intervenes: ‘I also serve your same God, Moses. That is why I confirm his law. Even though you see me denying his law of eye for eye, I am not rebellious against him, I only appear to be. This is not what it seems… you can trust that Rome preserved your entire message exactly as you said it, because its ways were like your way… that is why it still venerates my image.’ The excuses continue: ‘We do not worship the cross; we only venerate it.’, ‘We do not have that man as God; we only accept him as our only Lord and savior.’ Moses emphasizes his message: ‘You shall not bow before likenesses of anything as a way of honoring my God… you shall not have other gods, nor other saviors to worship.’ Aaron’s excuses after hearing the excuses of the others: ‘That also applies to me. I worship only Jehovah; this golden calf is my way of doing it.’ More excuses from those who do not obey Moses: ‘We do not worship the cube; it is only a direction.’, ‘We do not worship the wall; we only honor it.’ //76
Michael confronts the god Mars, a usurper. @JoseGalindoMMXXVI This channel exists to challenge dogmas that for centuries were imposed on peoples as if they were absolute truth. Many of those ideas did not spread through the force of reason, but through the weight of power, tradition, and, in other times, even by the sword. Here I analyze texts and doctrines to question what few dare to reexamine. If you seek to think for yourself and examine what others accept without questioning, this channel is for you and will give you a basis to detect even more lies than the ones I detected, and perhaps it will even encourage you to create your own channel to warn people who do not deserve to be deceived. //64
«
Idolatry does not educate, does not liberate, does not improve: it only enriches those who exploit it. How can they give a rational explanation for this? The false prophet promises salvation to the unjust; the true prophet warns that the unjust will not change and only the righteous will be saved. , BAC 72 3 77[1] , 0015
│ English │ #XVPK
Between Dogma and the Manipulation of a Cruel Woman. (Video language:French) /315/ https://youtu.be/gDOOFcjMpjc,
Day 193
The Curse That Ruined My Career: Why Did I Accept the Help of That Traitor Uncle? – 3/3 (Video language:Spanish) /26/ https://youtu.be/UuHXiQBOfjY
«The black cat that devours the dove of the undeserved peace that Caesar promotes for men of black souls
Do not confuse me with the defenders of Hellenism; I do not preach the teachings of Cleobulus of Lindos https://youtube.com/shorts/DfYvX3Uzfao Quoting passages from the Bible, the Book of Enoch, the Gospel of Philip, or the Gospel of Thomas does not mean that I believe everything that the Bible or those books say. I do not believe in loving one’s enemies, I do not believe in offering the other cheek to the aggressor, I do not believe in walking the double distance or carrying the double burden. Nor do I believe in the faithfulness of the Roman Empire, an Empire that decided which texts would enter the Bible and which would be considered canonical or supposed apocrypha, and that continued to exist under another name, while essentially preserving the same structure of power, ultimately influencing which texts would be accepted, which would be rejected, and which of those supposed apocrypha would later come to light. An Empire that imposed statues instead of justice and dogmas instead of reason. And I do not believe that a statue, which cannot even hold itself upright in the face of an earthquake, is capable of serving to obtain favors from the Supreme God, who needs no intermediaries, as if someone could say a word that He would not hear; that Supreme God who says that there is no other Supreme God, but only Him.
The successors of the leaders of the same Empire that canonized the injustice of its own lies now tell us that God loves the assailants:
‘Give to everyone who asks you, and if anyone takes away what is yours, do not ask for it back.’ Luke 6:30
Do you really believe that Luke 6:30 is a message that Rome persecuted and not one intended to protect what it stole from future claims?
Isaiah 57:19 I will create the fruit of the lips: Peace, peace to him who is far away and to him who is near, says Jehovah; and I will heal him. 20 But the wicked are like the troubled sea, which cannot rest, and its waters cast up mire and mud. 21 There is no peace, says my God, for the wicked.
Psalms 5:4 For You are not a God who takes pleasure in wickedness; the evil man will not dwell with You. 5 The foolish shall not stand in Your sight; You hate all who practice iniquity. 6 You shall destroy those who speak lies; the LORD abhors the bloody and deceitful man.
Psalms 50:16 But to the wicked God said: What right have you to speak of My laws, and to take My covenant in your mouth? 17 For you hate correction, and cast My words behind you. 18 When you saw a thief, you ran with him, and you were a companion of adulterers.
Here you are going to see that Pope Leo has stated a lie: that God loves everyone. It is the same thing Pope Francis said when he was alive. Observe for yourselves. Now, this is as false as the false message that Rome has promoted. You only need to concentrate on the meaning of the words and what those words imply. It happens that the Roman Empire did not accept the true message it persecuted, because gospel means good news, glad tidings. Therefore, the message that Rome persecuted was a selective message; it was good news, not for everyone, but for the righteous. Why? Because God has a message of justice, and justice is never good news for the unjust. The triumph of the victim over the thief who robbed him is not a triumph for the thief; it is a triumph for the victim because the victim recovers what was stolen from him. But the message adulterated by the Roman Empire says the opposite. It says, for example, that one should not demand from anyone what belongs to oneself. Did you notice? That message of not demanding what belongs to oneself is in accordance with the thief. Caesar’s dove says: ‘Peace for everyone because God loves everyone.’
Gabriel’s black cat replies: ‘The prophet Isaiah has said, ‘There is no peace for the wicked.’ There is no peace without justice and there is no justice without truth.’
If you consider yourself coherent, do not act in such a simplistic manner; do not allow yourself to be dragged along by the masses of people who repeat false religious dogmas without wanting or being able to effectively analyze the truthfulness of those religious dogmas: This is not as easy and simple as saying: ‘They contradict the Bible’, because there are many lies from ‘Babylon’ in the Bible itself; the Roman Empire has told its own version of events, and as was to be expected, its version of events is false. This is so because they spoke horrible things against God, and I will tell you what this means: The Romans did not convert to Christianity because, in fact, they created Christianity after destroying a religion that resembles none of those known to the world. Nevertheless, they took some elements from that persecuted religion, such as the passage cited (Daniel 11:36-37), as a kind of challenge to that prophecy, and the result is an endless number of contradictions in the Bible that condemn the incoherent and false prophets who defend that Roman legacy to perpetual confusion.
Daniel 11:36-37 And the king shall do according to his will, and he shall exalt himself and magnify himself above every god; and he shall speak astonishing things against the God of gods, and shall prosper until the wrath is completed; for what has been determined shall be fulfilled.
Then the God of gods said to Gabriel: ‘Announce to the sun-worshiping empire that they will have no peace, they do not deserve it; take the black cat and put an end to their undeserved peace.’
In a vast territory where peace once reigned, a ruthless emperor rose to power through blood and treachery. He had invaded and plundered countless peaceful peoples, massacring those who opposed his rule and usurping the throne that rightfully belonged to another.
Once he had consolidated his rule with iron and fire, the emperor summoned his soldiers to the great square of his capital. With an arrogant gesture, he raised his arms and proclaimed:—With the riches we have plundered and the weapons we have acquired, our peace will be guaranteed.To give weight to his declaration, he released a white dove into the air with an olive branch in its beak. His legions cheered enthusiastically, celebrating their victory with applause and cries of glory.
But then, a thunderous roar shook the sky. Thunder resounded furiously, and in an instant, a dense cloud formed over the square. A descending lightning bolt struck the ground in front of the emperor, releasing a blinding light and a white smoke that quickly dissipated. When the light faded, a figure was revealed before everyone’s astonished eyes. He was a man with short hair, dressed in an impeccable blue uniform. He wielded a shining sword in his right hand, whose brilliant light seemed to cut through reality itself. With his other hand, he held a black cat that kept its gaze fixed on the emperor.
The stranger spoke in a firm and authoritative voice:
—There will be no peace for you. You have shed too much innocent blood, and that will only bring misery upon your empire. A curse weighs upon your kingdom because of your crimes and thefts. The soldiers, witnesses to that portent, were paralyzed with fear. The emperor turned pale as he felt that his fate had been sealed.
While the dove was flying, it saw Gabriel holding the cat with his left arm and said: ‘Beware of that diabolical black cat.’
The cat replied: ‘Diabolical is wishing peace upon the wicked.’
The man then released the black cat. With a dazzling leap, the cat caught the white dove in mid-flight and devoured it without hesitation.
After its action, the feline returned to the man, who received it calmly.
A second lightning bolt struck, illuminating the scene with its spectral brilliance. In an instant, both the man and the cat disappeared, as if they had never been there. At that precise moment, the sound of trumpets resounded from all directions. A much more powerful empire had surrounded the city. Justice had arrived.
«
«In Mark 3:29, the ‘sin against the Holy Spirit’ is warned as unforgivable. However, history and the practices of Rome reveal a shocking moral inversion: the truly unforgivable sin, according to their dogma, is questioning the credibility of their Bible. Meanwhile, serious crimes such as the killing of innocents have been ignored or justified under the same authority that claimed to be infallible. This post examines how this ‘unique sin’ was constructed and how the institution used it to protect its power while justifying historical injustices.
In purposes contrary to Christ is the Antichrist, if you read Isaiah 11 you will see the mission of Christ in his second life, and it is not to favor everyone but only the righteous, but the Antichrist is inclusive, despite being unjust, he wants to climb onto Noah’s Ark, despite being unjust he wants to leave Sodom with Lot… Happy are those to whom these words are not offensive. He who is not offended by this message, that one is righteous, congratulations to him: Christianity was created by the Romans, only a mind friendly to celibacy, proper of Greek and Roman leaders, enemies of the ancient Jews, could conceive a message like the one that says: ‘These are the ones who did not defile themselves with women, for they remained virgins. They follow the Lamb wherever he goes. They were purchased from among mankind and offered as firstfruits to God and to the Lamb’ in Revelation 14:4, or a message like this one which is similar: ‘For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like the angels of God in heaven,’ in Matthew 22:30, both messages sound as if they came from a Roman Catholic priest, and not from a prophet of God who seeks this blessing for himself: He who finds a wife finds what is good and receives favor from the Lord (Proverbs 18:22), Leviticus 21:14 A widow, or a divorced woman, or a woman who has been defiled, or a prostitute, he shall not marry; but he shall take as a wife a virgin from his own people.
I am not Christian; I am henotheist. I believe in one supreme God above all, and I believe that several created gods exist—some faithful, others deceivers. I only pray to the supreme God. But since I was indoctrinated from childhood in Roman Christianity, I believed in its teachings for many years. I applied those ideas even when common sense told me otherwise. For example—so to speak—I turned the other cheek to a woman who had already struck me on one. A woman who, at first, acted like a friend, but then, without justification, began treating me as if I were her enemy, with strange and contradictory behavior. Influenced by the Bible, I believed she had become an enemy because of some spell, and that what she needed was prayer to return to being the friend she had once shown herself to be (or pretended to be). But in the end, everything only got worse. As soon as I had the chance to dig deeper, I uncovered the lie and felt betrayed in my faith. I came to understand that many of those teachings did not come from the true message of justice, but from Roman Hellenism infiltrated into the Scriptures. And I confirmed I had been deceived. That’s why I now denounce Rome and its fraud. I do not fight against God, but against the slanders that have corrupted His message. Proverbs 29:27 declares that the righteous hates the wicked. However, 1 Peter 3:18 claims that the righteous died for the wicked. Who can believe that someone would die for those he hates? To believe it is to have blind faith; it is to accept incoherence. And when blind faith is preached, could it be because the wolf wants his prey not to see the deception?
Jehovah will shout like a mighty warrior: ‘I will take vengeance on My enemies!’
(Revelation 15:3 + Isaiah 42:13 + Deuteronomy 32:41 + Nahum 1:2–7)
And what about the so-called ‘love for the enemy’ that, according to some Bible verses, the Son of Jehovah supposedly preached—claiming we should imitate His Father’s perfection through universal love? (Mark 12:25–37, Psalm 110:1–6, Matthew 5:38–48)
That is a lie spread by the enemies of both Father and Son.
A false doctrine born from mixing Hellenism with sacred words.»
1 이 반복되는 꿈은 무엇을 의미할까? 10년 후 똑같은 꿈을 꿨다. ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot, Perplexity가 꿈을 분석한다. https://ntiend.me/2026/08/25/idi30cope/ 2 त्याच्या दोन चंद्रांनी गिळंकृत केलेला ग्रह https://ellameencontrara.com/2026/07/01/idi40moons/ 3 Was atmete Jona im Inneren des Wals? Großer Fisch oder großer Betrug? https://bestiadn.com/2026/06/08/was-atmete-jona-im-inneren-des-wals-groser-fisch-oder-groser-betrug/ 4 Der Bericht über Jesu Auferstehung stimmt nicht mit den Prophezeiungen überein. https://bestiadn.com/2026/05/03/der-bericht-uber-jesu-auferstehung-stimmt-nicht-mit-den-prophezeiungen-uberein/ 5 교리의 미로를 빠져나가는 출구와 영원히 갇히지 않기 위해 그곳을 떠나는 의로운 사람들. https://purifying-the-message.blogspot.com/2026/07/blog-post_29.html
«The Parable of the Unjust Steward as a Warning About the Unfaithful Who Would Corrupt the Message.
In the parable of the unjust steward, an administrator is caught mismanaging his master’s goods, and the master tells him: ‘You can no longer be steward.’ Then the man thinks about his future and decides to alter the debts of the debtors in order to gain their favor and secure a place to live (Luke 16:1–8).
But… what if the parable concealed a deeper message? Jesus constantly spoke against the unfaithful and the corrupt.
Then an unsettling question arises: did Jesus know that, afterward, unfaithful men would alter the original message, just as the steward altered his master’s accounts?
What if the Roman councils were the reflection of that parable? What if part of what was later presented as truth about Jesus was, in reality, a modified version of his original teaching?
Because something never completely fit together.
On one hand: ‘Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for justice’ (Matthew 5:6).
On the other hand: ‘An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth’ (Exodus 21:24, Leviticus 24:20, Deuteronomy 19:21).
And also: ‘Do not resist the evil person’ and ‘love your enemies’ (Matthew 5:39–44).
Furthermore: ‘Do not think that I have come to abolish the law… but to fulfill it’ (Matthew 5:17–18).
Can you imagine that a message saying this could be coherent?: ‘Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for justice… as long as they forget about an eye for an eye and love the enemy of justice.’
Did Jesus warn, through the parable of the unjust steward, that persecuting Rome would alter his message after finding itself condemned by it?
«
«If Satan Rules the World… Whose Books Are Those?
There is a contradiction that every interpretation of these passages must resolve: if you claim that Satan rules the world, the logical consequence is that he also rules the empire that imposes, promotes, and disseminates the very books that this same world regards as sacred.
You cannot maintain that the dragon controls the kingdoms of the earth, their laws, their institutions, and their elites, while at the same time believing that the books upon which the rulers of those kingdoms swear their oaths—and which those same powers promote and distribute worldwide—were miraculously exempt from his deception.
The deception is not only hidden; above all, it is found in what is obvious: in the books that this kingdom regards as sacred, and in the false ‘liberating’ movement that promises an awakening while never breaking the ritual. If the ritual continues—changing only the excuse—there has been no liberation.
Below is the complete structure and the exact transcript of the video.
[Satan]: ‘Where I reign, my books reign. Before them, subject kings swear their oaths.’
[The Deceived]: ‘Time to kneel.’
[The False Liberator]: ‘Did you know they distract you to block your critical thinking and keep you under control? You’ve already awakened. Share this video and awaken others.’
[The Deceived]: ‘Time to kneel.’
[Satan]: ‘I will descend to the earth to help the oppressed. I will give them rest. Charge double for double the distance. Where I reign, my books reign. Before them, subject kings swear their oaths.’
[Narrator]:
‘If you say that Satan already ruled the world in Jesus’ time because, in Matthew 4:8, he shows Him all the kingdoms of the earth as his own, then you are admitting that he was never overthrown and that justice has never reigned.
Daniel 7:23 prophesies a fourth kingdom that devours the whole earth. And in Revelation 13:2, it is the dragon who gives that empire his throne and his authority. But the decisive point comes in Revelation 12:9: only at the end is the dragon defeated. Until then, he and his angels—a word that simply means messengers—deceive the whole world.
Then an unavoidable question arises: did you really expect that this deception would not be embedded in the very books that the elites of his kingdom present as sacred?
If Satan rules, then his lie is the official word of his empire, and his books are the ones upon which oaths are sworn. And the false liberating movement serves as a smokescreen. It speaks of awakening, but never points to the dogmas that keep the righteous asleep and on their knees, making them believe that the wicked—whether or not he kneels beside them before the same symbols—is not wicked, but simply someone who needs to awaken.’
[Satan]: ‘Did you know that the brick in my wall has six sides? A cube has six sides. And if I unfold the cube, I can form a cross with six squares. With 666, everything fits together so that you fall into line to…’
[The Deceived]: ‘Time to kneel.’
[Narrator]:
‘If the ritual continues, there has been no awakening. They tell you to awaken, to break the system, to stop being a zombie. They tell you that you’ve already opened your eyes and that you are now one of the few who think for themselves. But if you look closely, you will discover the contradiction: the supposed messenger of freedom wears on his chest the very same symbol of the dogma he claims to fight.’
If the dragon gives his throne and authority to the fourth empire (Revelation 13:2), and his messengers deceive the whole world (Revelation 12:9), then it is logically inconsistent to assume that the books which that same empire preserves, promotes, finances, and requires its rulers to swear upon have somehow remained free from the official lie. If Satan rules, then the word that his empire imposes and spreads globally is the official word of his own kingdom.
The direct translation of the Greek term ángelos is simply ‘messenger.’ Once the text is stripped of its traditional mythological framework, the empire’s true agents are revealed: ideologues, emissaries, and media propagators tasked with spreading the system’s message and ensuring the ideological submission of the masses.
The character of the false liberator—or false dissident—does not seek to break the ritual, but rather to channel the discontent of those who attempt to question the system. He criticizes governments, the economy, or the visible media in order to project an image of critical thinking and a genuine search for freedom, but he never directs that questioning toward the books that the kingdom itself regards as sacred, nor toward the symbolic geometry upon which the empire rests. His function is not to break the cycle, but to redirect the protest so that the ritual remains intact: the rhetoric changes, but the knee remains on the ground.
«
«Walking on the edge of death along the dark path, but looking for the light, interpreting the lights projected on the mountains so as not to make a false step, to avoid death. █
Night was falling on the main road.
A blanket of darkness covered the winding path that wound through the mountains.
He did not walk aimlessly.
His goal was freedom, but the journey had only just begun.
With his body numb from the cold and his stomach empty for days,
he had no company but the elongated shadow cast by the headlights of the trucks that roared beside him,
advancing without stopping, indifferent to his presence.
Every step was a challenge,
every curve a new trap from which he had to emerge unscathed.
For seven nights and mornings,
he was forced to advance along the thin yellow line of a narrow road with just two lanes,
while trucks, buses and trailers whizzed by just inches from his body.
In the darkness, the deafening roar of engines enveloped him,
and the lights of trucks coming from behind cast their glow on the mountain in front of him.
At the same time, other trucks approached in the opposite direction,
forcing him to decide in fractions of a second
whether to pick up the pace or remain still in his precarious crossing,
where every movement meant the difference between life and death.
Hunger was a beast that devoured him from the inside,
but the cold was no less merciless.
In the sierra, the early hours of the morning were invisible claws that penetrated to the bones.
The wind enveloped him with its icy breath,
as if it wanted to extinguish the last spark of life that remained to him.
He took refuge where he could,
sometimes under a bridge,
other times in a corner of concrete that offered him a minimum of shelter.
But the rain was unforgiving.
Water seeped into his torn clothes,
sticking to his skin and stealing what little warmth he still had.
The trucks continued their march,
and he, stubbornly hoping that someone would feel sorry,
raised his hand, waiting for a gesture of humanity.
But the drivers drove on.
Some with looks of contempt,
others simply ignoring him, as if he were a ghost.
Every now and then, a compassionate soul would stop and offer him a quick ride,
but they were few.
Most saw him as a nuisance,
a shadow on the road,
someone not worth helping.
On one of those endless nights,
desperation drove him to search for food among the scraps left by travelers.
He was not ashamed to admit it:
he fought for food with pigeons,
snatching pieces of hardened biscuits before they could make them disappear.
It was an unequal fight,
but he was determined:
he was not willing to kneel before any image,
nor to accept any man as ‘only lord and savior’.
He was not willing to please those sinister individuals
who had already kidnapped him three times over religious differences,
who with their slanders had led him to walk that yellow line.
At another time, a kind man offered him a piece of bread and a drink.
A small gesture,
but in his pain,
that kindness was a balm.
But indifference was the norm.
When he asked for help,
many would walk away,
as if they feared that his misery was contagious.
Sometimes, a simple ‘no’ was enough to extinguish all hope,
but on other occasions, contempt was reflected in cold words or empty looks.
He didn’t understand how they could ignore someone who could barely stand,
how they could watch a man collapse without batting an eyelid.
And yet, he kept going.
Not because he had the strength,
but because he had no other choice.
He continued down the road,
leaving behind him miles of asphalt,
nights without rest and days without food.
Adversity hit him with everything it had,
but he resisted.
Because deep down,
even in the most absolute desperation,
the spark of survival still burned within him,
fueled by the desire for freedom and justice.
Psalm 118:17
‘I will not die, but I will live to proclaim the works of Jehovah.
18 Jehovah has chastened me severely, but He has not given me over to death.’
Psalm 41:4
‘I said, ‘Jehovah, have mercy on me
and heal me, for I confess with repentance that I have sinned against You.»
Job 33:24-25
‘God will have mercy on him and say, ‘Deliver him from going down to the pit; I have found a ransom;
25 his flesh shall become fresher than in childhood, and he shall return to the days of his youth.»
Psalm 16:8
‘I have set Jehovah always before me;
because He is at my right hand, I will not be shaken.’
Psalm 16:11
‘You will show me the path of life;
in Your presence, there is fullness of joy;
at Your right hand, there are pleasures forevermore.’
Matthew 7:14 For small is the gate and narrow the way that leads to life, and few are those who find it.
Leviticus 21:13 He shall take a virgin as his wife. 14 He shall not take a widow, a divorced woman, a disgraced woman, or a prostitute, but he shall take a virgin as his wife from among his own people, 15 so that he will not profane his offspring among his people; for I, the Lord, am the one who sanctifies them.
Isaiah 51:7 Listen to me, you who know righteousness, you people in whose hearts is my law: Do not fear the reproach of men, nor be dismayed by their insults. 8 For the moth will eat them up like a garment, and the worm will devour them like wool; but my righteousness will stand forever, and my salvation through all generations.
Psalm 119:1 Blessed are those who are consistent in their way, who walk according to the law of Jehovah.
Deuteronomy 19:18 The judges shall investigate thoroughly, and if that witness is found to be false and has falsely accused his brother, 19 then you shall do to him as he intended to do to his brother, and you shall purge the evil from among you. 20 Those who remain shall hear and be afraid, and shall no longer commit such wickedness among you. 21 You shall show him no pity; life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot.
Psalm 119:34 Give me understanding, and I will keep your law, and obey it with all my heart.
Daniel 12:3 Those who are wise will shine like the brightness of the heavens, and those who lead many to righteousness, like the stars for ever and ever.
Psalm 41:11-12
‘By this, I will know that You are pleased with me:
if my enemy does not triumph over me.
Micah 7:10 And my enemy shall see it, and shame shall cover her; she who said to me, ‘Where is Jehovah your God?’ My eyes shall see her; now she shall be trampled down like mud in the streets.
Psalms 41:12 As for me, You uphold me in my integrity
and set me in Your presence forever.’
Revelation 11:4
‘These witnesses are the two olive trees and the two lampstands standing before the God of the earth.’
Isaiah 11:2
‘The Spirit of Jehovah shall rest upon him:
the Spirit of wisdom and understanding, the Spirit of counsel and might, the Spirit of knowledge and the fear of Jehovah’
I made the mistake of defending the faith in the Bible, but out of ignorance. However, now I see that it is not the guiding book of the religion that Rome persecuted, but of the one it created to please itself with celibacy. That’s why they preached a Christ who doesn’t marry a woman, but rather His church, and angels who, despite having male names, do not look like men (draw your own conclusions). These figures are akin to the false saints—plaster-statue kissers—and similar to the Greco-Roman gods because, in fact, they are the same pagan gods under different names.
What they preach is a message incompatible with the interests of true saints. Therefore, this is my penance for that unintentional sin. By denying one false religion, I deny them all. And when I finish doing my penance, then God will forgive me and bless me with her, with that special woman I need. Because, although I don’t believe in the entire Bible, I do believe in what seems right and consistent to me within it; the rest is slander from the Romans.
Proverbs 28:13
‘He who covers his sins will not prosper, but whoever confesses and forsakes them will have mercy from the Lord.’
Proverbs 18:22
‘He who finds a wife finds a treasure and receives favor from the Lord.’
I seek the Lord’s favor embodied in that special woman.
She must be as the Lord commands that she be.
If this upsets you, it is because you have lost:
Leviticus 21:14
‘A widow, or a divorced woman, or a defiled woman, or a prostitute, he shall not marry these, but he shall marry a virgin from his own people.’
To me, she is glory:
1 Corinthians 11:7
‘Woman is the glory of man.’
Glory is victory, and I will find it with the power of light. Therefore, even though I don’t know her yet, I have named her: Light Victory.
And I nicknamed my web pages ‘UFOs’ because they travel at the speed of light, reaching corners of the world and shooting out rays of truth that strike down the slanderers. With the help of my web pages, I will find her, and she will find me.
When she finds me and I find her, I will tell her this:
‘You have no idea how many programming algorithms I had to devise to find you. You can’t imagine all the difficulties and adversaries I faced to find you, my Light of Victory.
I faced death itself many times:
Even a witch pretended to be you. Imagine, she told me she was the light, despite her slanderous behavior. She slandered me like no one else, but I defended myself like no one else to find you. You are a being of light; that’s why we were made for each other!
Now let’s get out of this damn place…
So this is my story. I know she will understand me, and so will the righteous.
Isaiah 51:6 Lift up your eyes to the heavens, and look down upon the earth; for the heavens shall vanish away like smoke, and the earth shall grow old like a garment, and its inhabitants shall perish in like manner; but my salvation shall be forever, and my righteousness shall not perish.
Psalms 16:11
‘You will show me the path of life;
in your presence there is fullness of joy;
at your right hand are pleasures forevermore.’
Matthew 7:13-14 Enter through the narrow gate; for wide is the gate and broad is the way that leads to destruction, and many are those who enter through it; for narrow is the gate and difficult is the way that leads to life, and few are those who find it.
Leviticus 21:13 He shall take a virgin as his wife. 14 He shall not take a widow, or a divorced woman, or one who has been defiled, or a prostitute; but he shall take a virgin of his own people as his wife, 15 so that he may not profane his offspring among his people; for I, the LORD, am the one who sanctifies them.
Psalms 118:20 This is the gate of the LORD; the righteous shall enter through it.
Proverbs 19:14 House and riches are an inheritance from fathers, but a prudent wife is from the LORD.
Daniel 12:13 But as for you, Daniel, go your way until the end; you shall rest, and then you shall rise to receive your inheritance at the end of the days.
Daniel 12:9 He replied, ‘Go your way, Daniel, for these words are closed up and sealed until the time of the end.’
Revelation 10:5-7 And the angel whom I saw standing on the sea and on the earth lifted up his hand to heaven, 6 and swore by him who lives forever and ever, who created heaven and the things in it, and the earth and the things in it, and the sea and the things in it, that there would be no more delay, 7 but in the days of the voice of the seventh angel, when he is about to sound the trumpet, the mystery of God will be fulfilled, as he declared to his servants the prophets.
Daniel 12:7 And I heard the man clothed in linen, who was above the waters of the river; he raised his right hand and his left hand toward heaven and swore by him who lives forever that it would be for a time, times, and half a time. And when the shattering of the power of the holy people is completed, all these things shall be fulfilled.
And when I find her, I will say to her: ‘Thank you for finding me, virgin of the gate, come, embrace me, and let me give you a kiss on the mouth…’
I have been a computer programmer, I like logic, in Turbo Pascal I created a program capable of producing basic algebra formulas at random, similar to the formula below. In the following document in .PDF you can download the code of the program, this is proof that I’m not stupid, that’s why the conclusions of my research should be taken seriously. https://ntiend.me/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/math21.pdf
If U+67=95 then U=28
«Cupid is condemned to hell along with the other pagan gods (The fallen angels for their rebellion against justice, sent to eternal punishment). █
Quoting these passages does not mean defending the entire Bible. If 1 John 5:19 says that “the whole world is under the power of the evil one,” but rulers swear on the Bible, then the Devil rules with them. If the Devil rules with them, then fraud also rules with them. Therefore, the Bible contains part of that fraud, camouflaged among truths. By connecting those truths, we can expose their deceptions. Righteous people need to know these truths so that, if they have been deceived by lies added to the Bible or other similar books, they can free themselves from them.
Daniel 12:7 And I heard the man clothed in linen, who was above the waters of the river, when he raised his right hand and his left hand to heaven and swore by Him who lives forever that it shall be for a time, times, and half a time. And when the power of the holy people is completely shattered, all these things shall be finished.
Considering that ‘Devil’ means ‘Slanderer,’ it is natural to expect that the Roman persecutors, being the adversaries of the saints, later bore false witness against the saints and their messages. Thus, they themselves are the Devil, and not an intangible entity that enters and exits people, as they made us believe precisely with passages like Luke 22:3 (“Then Satan entered Judas…”), Mark 5:12-13 (the demons entering the pigs), and John 13:27 (“After the morsel, Satan entered him”).
This is my purpose: to help righteous people not waste their power believing in the lies of impostors who have adulterated the original message, which never asked anyone to kneel before anything or pray to anything that had ever been visible.
It is no coincidence that in this image, promoted by the Roman Church, Cupid appears alongside other pagan gods. They have given the names of the true saints to these false gods, but look at how these men dress and how they wear their long hair. All this goes against faithfulness to God’s laws because it is a sign of rebellion, a sign of the fallen angels (Deuteronomy 22:5).
The serpent, the devil, or Satan (the slanderer) in hell (Isaiah 66:24, Mark 9:44). Matthew 25:41: “Then he will also say to those on his left: ‘Depart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire that has been prepared for the devil and his angels’.” Hell: the eternal fire prepared for the serpent and his angels (Revelation 12:7-12), for having combined truths with heresies in the Bible, the Quran, the Torah, and for having created false forbidden gospels that they called apocryphal, to give credibility to lies in the false sacred books, all in rebellion against justice.
Book of Enoch 95:6: “Woe to you, false witnesses and to those who weigh the price of injustice, for you will perish suddenly!” Book of Enoch 95:7: “Woe to you, unjust ones who persecute the righteous, for you yourselves will be handed over and persecuted because of that injustice, and the burden of your guilt will fall upon you!” Proverbs 11:8: “The righteous is delivered from trouble, and the wicked comes in his place.” Proverbs 16:4: “The Lord has made all things for Himself, even the wicked for the day of doom.”
Book of Enoch 94:10: “Unjust ones, I say to you that He who created you will overthrow you; upon your ruin, God will have no mercy, but rather, God will rejoice in your destruction.” Satan and his angels in hell: the second death. They deserve it for lying against Christ and His faithful disciples, accusing them of being the authors of Rome’s blasphemies in the Bible, such as love for the devil (the enemy).
Isaiah 66:24: “And they shall go out and look upon the corpses of the men who have rebelled against me; for their worm shall never die, nor shall their fire be quenched, and they shall be abhorrent to all flesh.” Mark 9:44: “Where their worm does not die, and the fire is never quenched.” Revelation 20:14: “Then Death and Hades were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death: the lake of fire.”
The false prophet: ‘God doesn’t need temples, but I do—mine comes with VIP seats for donors.’
Word of Satan: ‘Blessed are those who follow my advice and do not investigate my scriptures, because they will never feel the pain of knowing I lied to them.’
Word of Satan: ‘Love your enemies, bless those who curse you… and love the wolves, for only then can they devour the sheep without resistance.’
Word of Satan: ‘In my kingdom, the slapped ones will be consecrated virgins; they will prostrate with long hair; they will have no wives; they will walk two miles to obey my commands; that will be my glory.’
Word of Satan: ‘Offer your other cheek… because I love to see how the aggressor gets away with it unpunished.’
The false prophet makes concessions to avoid losing followers; the true prophet does not yield a single letter of justice.
The serpent cannot endure righteousness; that’s why it wants you to bow and kiss the feet of its monuments.
Word of Satan: ‘The wolf you welcome as a sheep will forget to seek meat and begin to bleat with endearing clumsiness.’
The serpent demands reverence, but not to God—rather to the statues it inspired. The serpent enforces worship to its images, hoping you bow like it does before error.
Something does not fit here in John 13:18: ‘Oh Judas, you are a traitor, but for the prophecy in Psalm 41:9 to be fulfilled I must trust you. I never sinned, although that same prophecy that recounts your betrayal says that I did in Psalm 41:4.’
Haksız yere verilen barışın güvercinini, Sezar’ın kara ruhlu insanlar için teşvik ettiği o barışı yiyip bitiren kara kedi https://ellameencontrara.com/2026/08/17/idi20cat/
Якби було правдою, що ми всі є дітьми Бога і, отже, рівні перед Ним, то як тоді можна пояснити це? https://144k.xyz/2026/06/03/idi08hdd/
Idolatry does not educate, does not liberate, does not improve: it only enriches those who exploit it. How can they give a rational explanation for this? The false prophet promises salvation to the unjust; the true prophet warns that the unjust will not change and only the righteous will be saved.»
GABRIELS.WORK 